Locked On Big 12 | Daily College Football & Basketball Podcast

While the 2026 recruiting cycle is still in its early stages, the Big 12 Conference is showing some promising signs, with several teams making strong moves and securing key commitments. It's too early to definitively declare how "great" the class will be collectively, but there are definitely reasons for optimism. Here's a breakdown of what's making the Big 12's 2026 recruiting look good right now: Early Momentum for Several Programs: Teams like Kansas, Arizona State, and Iowa State have emerged as early leaders in the Big 12 2026 class rankings. These programs are accumulating a good number of commits, signaling a strong start to their respective cycles. Quality Over Quantity (for some): While some teams are building depth with a higher number of commits, others are focusing on securing blue-chip talent. For example, Houston has landed a five-star recruit, demonstrating their ability to attract top-tier prospects. Baylor and BYU are also showing good potential with multiple blue-chip commits early on. In-State Focus: Many Big 12 programs, particularly those in Texas like Texas Tech, are effectively leveraging their in-state talent. This regional focus can be a significant advantage in building competitive rosters. Emerging Teams: The new additions to the Big 12 are also making their presence felt. For instance, Arizona State and UCF are showing early recruiting success, indicating that the expanded conference is proving attractive to recruits. Strategic Visits and Offers: Even teams that might not have a high number of commits yet, like Colorado, are actively hosting top prospects and extending offers. This indicates that they are in the mix for highly-rated players and their rankings could rise significantly as more commitments roll in. Deion Sanders and Colorado, in particular, are looking to make up ground with several top prospects visiting this summer. The Lure of the New Big 12: The recent conference realignment and the competitive landscape of the new Big 12 are likely appealing to recruits looking for opportunities to play at a high level. The increased visibility and strong competition within the conference can be a major draw. Things to Keep in Mind: Early Stages: It's crucial to remember that the 2026 recruiting class is still very young. Rankings will fluctuate significantly as more players commit and evaluations are refined. Transfer Portal Impact: While high school recruiting remains vital, the transfer portal also plays a massive role in roster construction. Teams are constantly balancing traditional recruiting with portal additions. NIL Influence: Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals are an increasingly important factor in recruiting. The ability of Big 12 programs to offer competitive NIL opportunities will influence their success. In summary, the Big 12's 2026 football recruiting class is showing encouraging signs with several teams building solid foundations and attracting notable talent. The coming months will be critical as more prospects make their decisions, but the early outlook suggests a competitive and promising cycle for the conference. Follow & Subscribe on all Podcast platforms… 🎧 https://link.chtbl.com/LOBig12?sid=YouTube Locked On College Conferences, HBCU, Basketball & More 🎧 https://linktr.ee/LockedOnCollege Follow on Twitter: https://twitter.com/drakectoll Follow the show on Twitter: https://twitter.com/LOBig12 Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The lawsuit filed by the University of Wisconsin against the University of Miami for alleged tampering with defensive back Xavier Lucas is a groundbreaking development in college athletics. This is a crucial precedent that could embolden other Power Four schools, like Baylor or Utah, to sue rivals such as BYU over tampering rumors.Wisconsin's lawsuit isn't merely an NCAA complaint; it's a state court legal action seeking to enforce a two-year revenue-share agreement Lucas had signed. The Badgers allege Miami and its affiliates directly contacted Lucas while he was under contract and not in the transfer portal, constituting tortious interference with their binding agreement. This moves enforcement from the NCAA's often-criticized compliance system to a court of law, where financial damages can be sought.This opens the door for schools like Baylor and Utah because both have faced public accusations and rumors of BYU tampering with their players. For instance, reports from outlets like Locked On Big 12 have discussed alleged tampering by BYU with players from both Utah (the "Holy War" rival) and Baylor. While these were previously informal complaints or fan speculation, the Wisconsin case provides a legal roadmap.If Baylor or Utah can gather sufficient evidence of impermissible contact and prove financial harm from alleged tampering (e.g., loss of a player under an existing or anticipated revenue-sharing agreement), they now have a blueprint to pursue civil litigation. This signals a new, more aggressive era where universities might prioritize legal action over traditional NCAA processes to protect their rosters and investments.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!RugietRugiet Ready is a next-gen prescription treatment designed to amplify arousal in the brain and boost blood flow. Head to Rugiet.com/LOCKEDONCOLLEGE and use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE to get 15% off today. GametimeToday's episode is brought to you by Gametime. Download the Gametime app, create an account, and use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE for $20 off your first purchase. Terms and conditions apply.Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at www.monarchmoney.com/lockedoncollege for 50% off your first year.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get ONE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Jay Bilas, the prominent ESPN college basketball analyst and former Duke basketball player, has indeed been vocal about the evolving landscape of college athletics, and his recent comments suggest that the transfer portal's frenetic activity might begin to wane in the wake of the House v. NCAA settlement. His reasoning centers on the fundamental shift introduced by the settlement: schools can now directly pay athletes, effectively moving towards a contract-based system. Here's a breakdown of Bilas's perspective:Direct University Payments and Contracts:The core of Bilas's argument is that with the House settlement, universities will be able to sign athletes to multi-year contracts.Previously, NIL deals, often facilitated by collectives, were typically one-year agreements. This allowed players maximum flexibility to enter the portal annually in search of better NIL opportunities or playing time.Bilas believes that once schools can offer players legally binding, multi-year contracts with specified compensation (within the $20.5 million cap), the incentive for players to frequently enter the portal will decrease.Buyout Clauses as a Deterrent:Bilas has highlighted that these new contracts could include buyout clauses. If a player signs a multi-year deal and then decides to transfer before its expiration, they might be required to pay a significant buyout to their current school.Furthermore, if another school wants to acquire that player, it might have to pay the buyout, and Bilas suggests that such a payment could count against the acquiring school's $20.5 million compensation cap. This would make it financially less attractive for schools to poach players already under contract.This structure, mirroring professional sports, would act as a powerful disincentive for frequent transfers, especially for players who have secured substantial multi-year deals.Increased Stability for Schools:From the perspective of schools, the ability to sign players to contracts provides much-needed roster stability. Coaches can build programs with greater certainty that their key players will remain for multiple seasons. This contrasts sharply with the "Wild West" era of the portal, where rosters could be decimated annually.This stability is crucial for player development, team cohesion, and the long-term planning of a program.The "Haves" and "Have-Nots" Still Exist, But Different Dynamics:Bilas acknowledges that the financial disparities between schools will persist. However, he suggests that by allowing schools to directly pay, it actually spreads talent out more than before, arguing against the idea that it will only concentrate talent among the traditional powerhouses. He points to situations where a school like Texas A&M, for example, can now compete financially with an Alabama in a way it might not have felt it could before.Caveats and Counterarguments:While Bilas's perspective is insightful, it's important to consider some nuances and potential counterarguments that suggest the portal may not "wane" as much as some hope:One-Year Deals May Persist: Some players, particularly those with strong professional aspirations (e.g., top basketball prospects eyeing the NBA after one year), might still prefer one-year deals to maintain flexibility and maximize their market value year-to-year. As one analyst noted, "these guys have only been signing one-year deals the whole time... why would you sign the deal before you get to play without Edy? ... you're not going to sign the four-year deal when Ed's there knowing you're not the man you're going to sign a 2-year deal edy leaves let's renegotiate now that you see what I can do about it."Negotiation Power: Top-tier players, even if offered multi-year contracts, may still have the leverage to negotiate more favorable exit clauses or shorter terms.Performance and Playing Time: Beyond money, playing time and fit within a system remain critical factors for transfers. If a player isn't getting the minutes or production they expect, even a contract might not prevent them from seeking new opportunities.Legal Challenges: The House settlement itself is still subject to appeals (like the Title IX appeal concerning back pay distribution). Further lawsuits could emerge to challenge contract terms or buyout clauses, potentially creating more instability.No Central Player Bargaining: Unlike professional leagues with collective bargaining agreements, college athletes are not employees and do not have a union. This means contract terms will be individually negotiated, leading to inconsistencies and potential disputes.In summary, Jay Bilas's argument is that the House settlement, by enabling direct university payments and multi-year contracts with buyouts, introduces a mechanism that could significantly reduce the volume and frequency of transfer portal activity. It aims to professionalize the athlete-school relationship, bringing a new layer of financial commitment and legal binding that was largely absent

College sports face a financial reckoning. Are non-revenue generating programs doomed in the wake of the House settlement?Drake Toll and a panel of Big 12 experts tackle the controversial future of collegiate athletics. The discussion spans the viability of Olympic sports, donor influence on program decisions, and the cultural impact of diverse athletic offerings. Jake Hatch provides insights on BYU's potential scholarship adjustments, while Cody Silvall argues for the growing popularity of wrestling and softball. The group debates the long-term consequences of cutting sports programs on university admissions and campus culture.Tune in for a thought-provoking analysis of the challenges and opportunities facing college athletics in this new era. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The House v. NCAA settlement creates a new system for direct university payments to athletes, but it does not solve the existing legal complexities for international student-athletes, meaning they cannot generally get paid through this revenue-sharing model without jeopardizing their visa status. Here's why:F-1 Visa Restrictions on Employment:Most international student-athletes in the U.S. are here on F-1 student visas. These visas are issued specifically for academic purposes and come with strict limitations on employment.Generally, F-1 visa holders are not allowed to engage in off-campus employment unless it's directly related to their degree and/or career development (e.g., Curricular Practical Training - CPT, or Optional Practical Training - OPT), and often requires specific authorization and time limits.The Problem: Direct payments from a university, even if framed as "NIL revenue sharing," are highly likely to be interpreted by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) as "active income" or a form of employment. This directly violates the terms of an F-1 visa. Risk of Visa Violation and Deportation:If an international student-athlete accepts direct payments from their university under the House settlement, they risk violating their visa status.Consequences of such a violation can be severe, including the termination of their F-1 visa, forced departure from the U.S. within a short period, or even potential deportation and bans on future re-entry. Lack of Federal Guidance:Despite the significant changes brought by NIL and now the House settlement, there has been no clear, explicit guidance from federal immigration authorities (USCIS or Department of Homeland Security) on how these new forms of athlete compensation apply to F-1 visa holders.Without such guidance, universities are in a difficult position. Many immigration attorneys and university international student offices strongly advise international student-athletes not to accept direct payments from their schools due to the immense risk to their immigration status.Limited Workarounds (Pre-Settlement, Still Applicable):Prior to the House settlement, for NIL deals, the limited "workarounds" for international student-athletes involved:Passive Income: Receiving compensation that doesn't involve "work" performed in the U.S. (e.g., a one-time royalty for a group licensing deal on apparel).Services Performed Abroad: Structuring NIL deals so that any "work" (e.g., social media posts, appearances) is performed while the athlete is outside the U.S. (e.g., during summer break in their home country) and payments are made to an international bank account.These workarounds were already complex and limited. The direct university payments, however, are explicitly tied to their participation for the university within the U.S., making these workarounds largely inapplicable.In essence, while the House settlement allows U.S. student-athletes to receive direct payments from their universities, international student-athletes are caught in a legal limbo due to federal immigration laws. Unless there is a specific legislative fix from Congress, or clear interpretive guidance from USCIS that carves out an exception for this type of compensation, international players cannot directly benefit from the revenue-sharing model without putting their visa status, and thus their ability to remain in the U.S. and compete, at extreme risk.This creates a significant disparity and a competitive challenge, particularly for sports with a high percentage of international athletes (e.g., track and field, tennis, swimming, soccer, basketball).Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!GametimeToday's episode is brought to you by Gametime. Download the Gametime app, create an account, and use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGEfor $20 off your first purchase. Terms and conditions apply. Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

talking about Texas Tech and Baylor potentially facing off in the Big 12 football championship in 2025! That's a much more plausible and interesting scenario given their current standing and trajectories within the revamped Big 12.Here's a breakdown of why both teams have a legitimate shot and what their paths might look like:Texas Tech Red Raiders: The Rising ContenderTexas Tech enters the 2025 season with a significant amount of buzz and high expectations, possibly higher than they've had in nearly two decades.Aggressive Roster Building: Head Coach Joey McGuire has been incredibly active and successful in the transfer portal. Texas Tech has reportedly brought in a top-ranked transfer class for 2025, adding significant talent, including players projected to be NFL Draft picks. This influx of talent is directly tied to their significant NIL efforts (as previously discussed, the $55M projected spend).Returning Quarterback: The return of their starting quarterback (likely Behren Morton, though the searches mention Jake Retzlaff for BYU, so assuming Morton for Tech based on other reports) is a huge factor for continuity and leadership. A stable, experienced QB is crucial for navigating a tough conference schedule.Coaching Staff Stability: Joey McGuire has established a clear culture and identity in Lubbock. While there have been coordinator changes, the overall vision and buy-in from the program seem strong. McGuire has publicly embraced the "championship or bust" mentality.Favorable Schedule (Relatively): Some analyses (like 247Sports) have noted that Texas Tech's 2025 schedule is relatively favorable within the Big 12, with a combined win percentage of opponents that's on the lower side. This could provide a clearer path to racking up wins.Preseason Projections: Several early 2025 power rankings and FPI projections are already putting Texas Tech near the top of the Big 12. For example, some have them as high as #1 or #2 contenders in the conference.Baylor Bears: The Resurgent Dark HorseThe Big 12 is expected to be incredibly competitive and balanced in 2025, especially with the additions of former Pac-12 schools (Utah, Arizona, Arizona State, Colorado).Kansas State is often picked as the favorite due to consistency and returning QB Avery Johnson.Arizona State is another strong contender, having won the Big 12 in 2024 (according to one source, implying a quick rise to power).BYU, TCU, and Iowa State are also expected to be in the mix.Conclusion:A Texas Tech vs. Baylor Big 12 Championship game in 2025 is a very plausible and exciting scenario.Texas Tech has the roster talent, NIL investment, and coaching continuity to break through and compete for their first Big 12 title. Their aggressive approach suggests they are truly aiming for the top.Baylor, riding the momentum of their strong finish in 2024 and with key offensive pieces returning, is poised to be a legitimate dark horse or even a front-runner.Both teams have the coaching, talent, and renewed optimism to make a deep run in the expanded and highly competitive Big 12. While they'll face stiff competition from other strong programs, a championship showdown between the Red Raiders and Bears in Arlington is certainly within the realm of possibility.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!GametimeToday's episode is brought to you by Gametime. Download the Gametime app, create an account, and use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGEfor $20 off your first purchase. Terms and conditions apply. Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The House v. NCAA settlement, with its mandate for direct university payments to athletes, is indeed creating an unprecedented financial crunch for many Power Four (P4) athletic departments, leading to widespread concerns that some will be forced to cut non-revenue sports. This is not just speculation; signals are already emerging from various institutions.Here's why P4 schools may have to start cutting non-revenue sports:1. The Massive New Expense: $20.5 Million Annually (and Growing)A Sudden Budget Line Item: Starting July 1, 2025, P4 schools can (and effectively must, to remain competitive) pay their athletes up to an estimated $20.5 million annually in direct compensation. This cap is also set to increase by at least 4% each year for a decade. This isn't "new money" being generated; it's a new, substantial expense that must be absorbed into existing athletic department budgets.Competing for Talent: The pressure to spend near this cap will be immense. If a school doesn't, it risks being at a significant disadvantage in recruiting and retaining top talent in revenue-generating sports like football and basketball, which are the primary drivers of conference media rights revenue.2. Uneven Distribution of Funds:Football and Basketball Get the Lion's Share: While the $20.5 million cap applies to the entire athletic department, the widespread expectation (and the distribution formula for the $2.8 billion in back pay) is that the vast majority of this money will go to football (estimated 70-75%) and men's basketball (around 15%). This leaves a tiny sliver of the pie for women's basketball (around 5%) and all other Olympic and non-revenue sports (the remaining 5%).The "Cost of Doing Business" for Football: For schools looking to remain competitive in the football arms race, allocating $15-20 million or more just to football players for direct compensation, on top of coaching salaries, facilities, and other expenses, forces difficult choices.3. Budgetary Strain and Deficits:Existing Financial Challenges: Even before the House settlement, many athletic departments, even in the Power Four, operate with thin margins or even deficits, often relying on university subsidies. The added $20.5 million expense exacerbates this significantly.Michigan's Example: The University of Michigan, a financially powerful athletic department, has already publicly announced plans for $10 million in budget cuts and a 10% staff reduction to help address a projected $27 million deficit for the 2025-26 academic year. This deficit is directly attributed to the $20.5 million for revenue sharing and an additional $6.2 million in new scholarships. If a powerhouse like Michigan is making cuts, it signals the severity of the situation for other P4 schools.4. Roster Limits and Scholarship Implications:New Roster Caps: The settlement also introduces new roster limits for many sports (e.g., football is capped at 105 players). While schools can "grandfather in" current athletes for a period, the long-term effect is a reduction in roster sizes.Unlimited Scholarships: While scholarships can now be offered to every athlete on a roster (within the new limits), this flexibility comes at a cost. If a non-revenue sport historically relied on a large number of walk-ons (who might now be eligible for scholarships but add to the cost), or if scholarship dollars are diverted to pay revenue-sport athletes, it puts pressure on overall departmental budgets.5. The Title IX Tightrope:Equitable Financial Assistance: Title IX mandates that financial assistance (which includes these new direct payments) must be provided equitably based on the participation rates of male and female athletes.The Dilemma: If a school allocates, say, 85-90% of its $20.5 million direct pay pool to male athletes in football and men's basketball, while male athletes constitute, for example, 60% of the overall athlete population, this creates a clear Title IX imbalance.Cutting Women's Sports as a "Solution": To try and balance the Title IX scales without diverting significant funds from football, some fear schools might be tempted to cut women's sports programs, or reduce their scope, to lower female participation numbers and thus reduce the required financial allocation. This would be a highly controversial and legally risky move, but the financial pressures are immense.Conclusion:The House settlement is a game-changer that professionalizes athlete compensation. However, the staggering new financial outlay for direct athlete payments, coupled with existing budget constraints and the disproportionate allocation of funds to revenue sports, puts immense pressure on non-revenue sports. While athletic directors like SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey express hope that sports won't be cut, the financial realities are forcing tough decisions. It is a very real and growing concern that many P4 schools will respond to this pressure by reducing funding, scaling back opportunities, or even eliminating some n

The House v. NCAA settlement fundamentally alters the landscape of college sports, and a key aspect of this change is how it reshapes the role of donors in compensating athletes. While it doesn't completely eliminate donor involvement, it dramatically shifts the direct payment mechanism, meaning donors generally cannot give directly to athletes in the same way they did through NIL collectives previously. Here's a breakdown of why this is the case:1. Direct University Payments Become Primary Compensation:Schools Pay Athletes: The core of the House settlement is that, starting July 1, 2025, universities themselves can directly pay athletes for their Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights, up to a set annual cap (initially around $20.5 million per school). This money comes from the university's athletic department revenue, primarily from media rights, ticket sales, and sponsorships.Donors' Role Shifts to the Athletic Department: Instead of donating to an external collective that then pays athletes, donors are now encouraged to direct their contributions to the university's general athletic fund, or specific "athletic impact funds" or "competitive excellence funds" established by the school. This money then becomes part of the school's overall athletic budget, from which the direct athlete payments are drawn. The University of Cincinnati, for instance, has explicitly stated their "Athletics Impact Fund" will play a key role in helping them fund this new model, and they are encouraging fans to contribute directly to it.2. Increased Scrutiny on Third-Party Deals (Targeting "Pay-for-Play"):NIL Go Clearinghouse: The settlement introduces a centralized reporting and vetting system called "NIL Go," managed by Deloitte. Any NIL deals between athletes and third parties (including collectives and individual donors) valued at $600 or more must be reported through this clearinghouse."Valid Business Purpose" and "Fair Market Value" Enforcement: The key here is the new scrutiny. These third-party deals will be evaluated to ensure they have a "valid business purpose" and that the compensation reflects "fair market value" for the actual NIL activity (e.g., endorsement, appearance, social media post).Targeting "Associated Entities/Individuals": The NCAA is permitted to prohibit NIL payments from "associated entities or individuals" (which includes donors contributing $50,000 or more, or affiliated collectives) if the payment lacks a valid business purpose or is not at fair market value. This is a direct attempt to curb what was perceived as "pay-for-play" where large sums from boosters were given simply to induce a player to commit or stay, rather than for a legitimate NIL activity. Reports indicate that over 70% of existing deals with booster collectives would have been denied under these new rules.3. The End of the "Wild West" for Booster-Driven Payments:No More Unregulated Direct Payments: The era where a booster could write a large check directly to an athlete, largely without oversight, is over. The intent of the settlement is to bring these payments under the umbrella of institutional control and compliance.Collectives Must Adapt: NIL collectives, which previously functioned as direct payment conduits, will need to fundamentally redefine their purpose. They can still exist to facilitate legitimate NIL opportunities between athletes and businesses, provide educational resources, or support other athlete welfare initiatives. However, their role as the primary source of guaranteed, large sums for current athletes is significantly diminished. Many schools expect collectives to transition into roles that support "true NIL" deals for market rates.In essence, post-House settlement:Donors are encouraged to give to the university directly to support the athletic department's new athlete compensation pool.Direct payments from individual donors or collectives to athletes for their NIL are still possible, but they are now heavily regulated, scrutinized for fair market value, and subject to enforcement. The intent is to crack down on payments that are seen as disguised recruiting inducements rather than legitimate NIL transactions.This shift aims to bring more structure and compliance to athlete compensation, moving it from a largely unregulated, booster-driven system to one where the universities themselves are the primary direct payers, accountable for how funds are distributed.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!GametimeToday's episode is brought to you by Gametime. Download the Gametime app, create an account, and use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGEfor $20 off your first purchase. Terms and conditions apply. Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partne

Big 12 football shakeup: Conference merger talks heat up as Brett Yormark takes on the SEC. Is a new Power 3 on the horizon?Drake and the squad break down the potential Big 12-ACC merger, analyzing its impact on college football's landscape. The conversation shifts to Commissioner Yormark's bold stance against SEC dominance and the ongoing Jake Retzlaff situation at BYU. Jake Hatch from Locked on BYU Cougars provides insider perspective on the Cougars' quarterback options, including McKay Hillstead and Bear Bachmeier.Tune in for expert analysis on conference realignment, power dynamics, and BYU's critical next 30 days as the Big 12 media day approaches. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The specter of future media rights negotiations looms large over the college athletics landscape, and it's a particularly precarious situation for the revitalized, but still fragile, Pac-12. With major conference TV deals set to expire around 2030 and 2031, the current "stability" of conference alignment could be severely tested, and the Pac-12, having just pieced itself back together, could indeed crumble again as its members are poached. Here's why: The Looming Media Rights Cliff: Big Ten: Their massive deals with FOX, CBS, and NBC expire after the 2029-2030 academic year. Big 12: Their current extensions with ESPN and FOX run through the 2030-2031 academic year. SEC: Their exclusive deal with ESPN extends further, through 2033-2034. ACC: While the ACC's grant of rights and ESPN deal currently run through 2036, lawsuits from Florida State and Clemson are actively challenging its enforceability, seeking to invalidate the GoR or enable exit by the early 2030s. This means that around 2030-2031, a significant portion of the most valuable college football inventory will hit the market simultaneously. The Pac-12's Vulnerability: The "new" Pac-12, set to formally begin in 2026, will comprise Oregon State, Washington State, and a collection of former Mountain West schools (Boise State, Colorado State, Fresno State, San Diego State, Utah State, potentially more). While they are actively negotiating a new media rights deal for 2026 and beyond, it's virtually guaranteed to be significantly less lucrative per school than the deals held by the Big Ten, SEC, Big 12, and even the ACC (despite its current issues). This creates an irresistible incentive for Pac-12 schools, even those that have just joined, to jump ship if offered a slice of a much larger financial pie. A jump from, say, $10-15 million (estimated new Pac-12 deal) to $50-70+ million (potential Big 12/Big Ten deal) is too significant to ignore. Weakened Grant of Rights: While the new Pac-12 will undoubtedly have a grant of rights to bind its members, the history of conference realignment shows that such agreements, while legally binding, can be overcome by: Mass Exodus: If enough schools decide to leave simultaneously, the remaining conference can collapse, making exit fees and GoRs less relevant in practice. Legal Challenges/Settlements: As seen with the ACC, schools are willing to pursue costly legal battles to escape unfavorable GoRs if the financial disparity is too great. The Pac-12's GoR will be tested. The "Third Superconference" Arms Race: Both the Big 12 and the ACC (should it survive its internal challenges) will be looking to strengthen their positions against the SEC and Big Ten. Big 12's Opportunity: Commissioner Brett Yormark has consistently stated the Big 12 is "open for business." When the 2030-2031 media rights window opens, the Big 12 will be in a prime position to look West again. Programs like Boise State or San Diego State, if they have built up their brand in the "new Pac-12," could become attractive targets to further solidify the Big 12's footprint and market share. ACC's Role (if stable): If the ACC manages to weather its current GoR challenges and keep its core intact, it too might eye strategic expansion. No Clear "Power" Identity for New Pac-12: While the Pac-12 is bringing in some strong Group of Five programs, it fundamentally lacks the historical "Power Conference" brand recognition and top-tier recruiting grounds of its former self. This makes it inherently less stable than conferences with established flagship universities. The Outlook: The Pac-12's immediate future (2026 onwards) relies on establishing a stable media deal and solidifying its new membership. However, the period between 2030 and 2031 presents a critical juncture. Unless the new Pac-12 can somehow negotiate a media deal that closes a significant portion of the revenue gap with the Big 12 and ACC, or unless the market for college football rights cools dramatically, it's highly probable that its members will once again become desirable targets for expansion by the more financially robust conferences. This would trigger another round of realignment, potentially leading to the Pac-12 crumbling for a second time, leaving Oregon State and Washington State in an even more isolated position. The lessons from the initial realignment are clear: money talks, and a conference's long-term stability is inextricably linked to its media rights valuation. Follow & Subscribe on all Podcast platforms… 🎧 https://link.chtbl.com/LOBig12?sid=YouTube Locked On College Conferences, HBCU, Basketball & More 🎧 https://linktr.ee/LockedOnCollege Follow on Twitter: https://twitter.com/drakectoll Follow the show on Twitter: https://twitter.com/LOBig12 Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The landmark House v. NCAA antitrust settlement, which has received final approval, is indeed poised to fundamentally reshape the NIL landscape. This transformation could create a scenario where schools that relied less on massive, external NIL collectives (like Utah) find themselves in a more level, or even advantageous, position compared to those that leveraged large collectives (like BYU is perceived to have).Here's why this shift is likely:The Core Change: Direct University Payments (and the $20.5M Cap)The most significant aspect of the House settlement is that, starting July 1, 2025, universities themselves can directly pay athletes for their Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights, up to an initial annual cap of approximately $20.5 million per school. This money will come directly from the school's general athletic revenue, primarily media rights, ticket sales, and sponsorships.How this "Hurts" Schools with Large, External NIL Collectives (Like BYU):Diminished Role of Collectives: The initial NIL era (post-July 2021) saw a "Wild West" where external collectives, funded by boosters and donors, became the primary vehicles for compensating athletes, often blurring the lines into "pay-for-play" for recruiting and retention. These collectives operated largely outside university control.The "Hurt": With schools now directly paying athletes from their own revenue streams, the immediate need for external collectives to provide large sums to current athletes is expected to decrease significantly. Donors who previously contributed to collectives may now be encouraged to donate directly to the athletic department to fund the university's portion of the $20.5 million cap.BYU's Situation: BYU has reportedly had a robust and effective collective ecosystem, with significant donor support. While precise figures are hard to verify, BYU's collective efforts have been seen as quite aggressive and successful in attracting talent, especially in football and men's basketball. The "hurt" for BYU isn't a lack of funds, but rather a shift in the mechanism of payment. A large, well-funded collective operating independently now faces the reality that the university is taking over much of the direct compensation role. The challenge for BYU's collective will be to redefine its purpose – perhaps focusing on actual NIL deals with local businesses, post-eligibility benefits, or specific charitable initiatives, rather than simply being a direct player compensation fund.Fair Market Value (FMV) Scrutiny: The settlement mandates that any third-party NIL deals (those still done outside the university's direct payment system) exceeding $600 must go through a clearinghouse (managed by Deloitte) and be reviewed for "fair market value."The "Hurt": This new scrutiny directly targets the "pay-for-play" deals that collectives often facilitated. If a collective was giving a player, for example, $500,000 for a social media post that would typically be worth $50,000, that deal could now be flagged and potentially disallowed. Schools with collectives that heavily relied on such inflated or non-transparent deals may find their previous strategies untenable.Pressure to Fund the Cap from University Budgets: Even if a school had a thriving collective, it now faces a new, mandatory $20.5 million annual expense that must be funded from university revenue. This is a significant budget line item that wasn't there before. For schools that relied heavily on external collective funding to stay competitive, they now need to ensure their internal athletic department budget can handle this new, direct cost.How this "Benefits" Schools with Smaller, External NIL Collectives (Like Utah):Leveling the Playing Field (Financially):Utah's Situation: While Utah certainly has NIL collectives (e.g., Crimson Collective, Who Rocks the House Collective), it's generally perceived to have operated at a smaller or more targeted scale than some of the top-tier collectives nationally, or compared to the perceived aggressive efforts of BYU's system in certain instances.The "Benefit": The $20.5 million cap effectively puts a ceiling on what any university can directly pay its athletes. For schools like Utah, who might not have had a collective raising $20+ million annually, the settlement provides a new, consistent, and guaranteed revenue stream from the conference that they can now allocate directly to athletes. This allows them to immediately compete at the same maximum direct payment level as schools with historically larger collective budgets.Utah's AD Mark Harlan has already stated, "We are all-in on investing up to the maximum allowable in revenue share, which is approximately $20.5 million for 2025-26, though we are finalizing our plans for how the revenue will be shared." This demonstrates their immediate commitment to leveraging the new system, potentially closing any perceived gap in NIL spending that existed before.Reduced Reliance on External Fundraising Pressures:For sch

The recent House v. NCAA settlement, which paves the way for direct athlete compensation, is indeed raising significant concerns about its impact on Title IX. Many advocates for gender equity in sports believe that the settlement, in its current form, delivers a "brutal hit" to Title IX's core principles, primarily because of how the new financial model is likely to be implemented. Here's a breakdown of why this concern is so prevalent: 1. The Discrepancy in Revenue Allocation: The $20.5 Million Cap: The settlement allows schools to share up to an estimated $20.5 million annually with athletes (this cap will increase over time). However, there are few explicit guidelines within the settlement on how this money must be distributed across sports to comply with Title IX. Expected Skew Towards Revenue Sports: The widespread expectation, and indeed the stated intention of many athletic departments, is that the vast majority of this $20.5 million will be allocated to football (estimated 70-75% or around $15 million) and men's basketball (around 15% or $3 million). This leaves a significantly smaller percentage (perhaps 5% or $1 million for women's basketball and another 5% or $1 million for all other sports, including women's Olympic sports) to be distributed among female athletes. Historical Precedent: The back-pay portion of the settlement (approximately $2.8 billion) further illustrates this expected disparity, with 90% of those damages going to male athletes (75% to football, 15% to men's basketball) and only 5% to women's basketball and 5% to all other sports. This historical split, if replicated in future revenue sharing, directly contradicts the spirit, if not the letter, of Title IX. 2. Title IX's "Financial Assistance" Interpretation: Department of Education's Stance: The U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR), which enforces Title IX, has clarified that any payments from a school to an athlete for NIL are classified as "financial assistance." Under Title IX, financial assistance must be provided proportionally to male and female athletes based on their participation rates. 3. The "No New Money" Problem and Cuts to Other Sports: Reallocation of Existing Funds: Many athletic departments are emphasizing that this $20.5 million is not new money but must be covered through existing revenue streams (media rights, ticket sales, fundraising) or through cuts. Threat to Non-Revenue Sports (Including Women's Sports): Faced with a massive new mandatory expense, the fear is that institutions will look to cut or de-emphasize non-revenue generating sports, including many women's sports programs, to free up funds for the direct athlete payments in football and men's basketball. While the settlement included a compromise to grandfather in some roster limits, the financial pressure is immense. The Collegiate Coaching Associations have already voiced concerns about this potential "devastating consequence for non-revenue sports." 4. Increased Legal Vulnerability for Universities: Private Litigation: While the Biden administration had issued guidance emphasizing Title IX's application to NIL, a subsequent administration could withdraw it. However, Title IX can also be enforced through private litigation. This means that female athletes or advocacy groups could sue universities that fail to equitably distribute revenue-sharing funds. Unclear Guidance: The lack of clear, explicit federal guidance within the settlement itself on how Title IX applies to this new revenue-sharing model leaves schools in a precarious position. They must navigate how to balance competitive pressures (needing to pay top football/men's basketball players) with Title IX compliance, risking lawsuits if they get it wrong. In essence, the "brutal hit" to Title IX stems from the fact that while the settlement allows for athlete compensation, it doesn't adequately mandate equitable distribution, and the existing economic model of college sports strongly incentivizes disproportionate spending on male revenue-generating sports. This creates a massive new financial hurdle for schools to clear while trying to remain compliant with a federal law designed to ensure gender equity in educational programs, including athletics. Many believe that without further legislative or judicial intervention, the new era of college sports could inadvertently exacerbate existing gender disparities. Follow & Subscribe on all Podcast platforms… 🎧 https://link.chtbl.com/LOBig12?sid=YouTube Locked On College Conferences, HBCU, Basketball & More 🎧 https://linktr.ee/LockedOnCollege Follow on Twitter: https://twitter.com/drakectoll Follow the show on Twitter: https://twitter.com/LOBig12 Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The landmark House v. NCAA antitrust settlement, which received final approval from a federal judge in late May 2025, is indeed set to impose a significant financial burden on all Division I universities, including BYU and others, primarily through a new model of direct athlete compensation. Here's how it will cost universities an estimated $20 million annually and why it's a challenge, particularly for schools outside the wealthiest tier:The $20.5 Million Annual Cap for Direct Athlete Payments:New Revenue Sharing: Starting on July 1, 2025, the settlement allows (and for Power Four conferences, effectively requires) Division I schools to directly share revenue with their athletes. This marks a revolutionary departure from the NCAA's long-standing amateurism model.Initial Cap: The initial annual cap for this direct athlete compensation is set at approximately $20.5 million per school for the 2025-2026 academic year. This cap is expected to increase by at least 4% annually over the 10-year term of the settlement.Across All Sports: This $20.5 million is intended to cover compensation across all varsity sports within the athletic department, not just revenue-generating sports like football and men's basketball.Funding Breakdown (General Expectation): While individual schools have discretion on how to allocate the funds, the general expectation is that the vast majority will go to the highest-revenue sports. Projections suggest:Around 75% ($15 million) will go to football players.Approximately 15% ($3 million) will go to men's basketball players.Around 5% ($1 million) to women's basketball players.The remaining 5% ($1 million) to all other sports.How This Hurts All Universities, Including BYU:Massive New Expense: This $20.5 million represents a brand-new, mandatory expense that athletic departments must now absorb. For many schools, even those in Power Four conferences, this is a significant and sudden increase to their annual operating budget.Budgetary Strain: Athletic departments, while generating substantial revenue, also have considerable expenses (coaching salaries, facilities, travel, scholarships, administrative costs). Adding $20.5 million per year for direct athlete pay will strain budgets, potentially requiring cuts elsewhere, increased fundraising, or even larger subsidies from the university's general fund (which often comes from student tuition or state appropriations).Maintaining Competitiveness: The "cost of doing business" in high-level college athletics has just dramatically increased. To remain competitive in recruiting and player retention, schools feel compelled to pay close to that $20.5 million cap. Failure to do so could put them at a disadvantage against rival programs that can afford to pay more.Impact on Non-Revenue Sports: While the majority of the money is expected to go to football and men's basketball, the requirement to allocate some funds to other sports, coupled with the overall budget strain, raises concerns for non-revenue generating sports. Some speculate that schools might have to cut certain sports or reduce opportunities (e.g., walk-on programs, which will also be impacted by new roster limits) to manage costs, although the settlement did include a compromise to "grandfather in" roster limits for current athletes.Funding the Back Pay: In addition to the annual direct payments to current athletes, universities (through their conferences) also contribute to the $2.8 billion in back pay for athletes who competed between 2016 and 2024. This payment is distributed over 10 years, further impacting conference revenue distributions to schools. The Power Four conferences are responsible for 24% of these damages, while the NCAA covers 40% and other conferences cover the rest through reduced distributions.Impact on BYU and Similar Schools:BYU, as a newly full-share member of the Big 12 (receiving around $50 million annually from media rights starting 2025-2026), is in a relatively strong position compared to some. However, it's still a significant financial challenge:Affordability Question: Even with their increased Big 12 revenue, the question remains if BYU can comfortably afford the full $20.5 million without impacting other areas. BYU has historically run a very lean, debt-free athletic department without direct Church funding for athletics. The increased Big 12 revenue in 2023-2024 (partial share) and 2025-2026 (full share) helps, but that $20.5 million is a new expense.In conclusion, the House v. NCAA settlement represents a fundamental shift in college sports, directly putting a $20.5 million annual bill on universities for direct athlete compensation. While necessary from a legal standpoint to avoid even larger liabilities, it creates a new and substantial financial pressure on all athletic departments, forcing them to re-evaluate budgets, revenue streams, and competitive strategies in this unprecedented era.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!GametimeToday's episode is brou

The debate over the College Football Playoff (CFP) format has become a battleground reflecting the power dynamics in college athletics, with the SEC initially pushing for a model that would significantly favor it and the Big Ten over the Big 12 and ACC.The SEC's Initial Position: The "4-4-2-2-1" ModelFor some time, a prominent proposal, often associated with the SEC and Big Ten's interests, was the "4-4-2-2-1" model (or sometimes "4-4-2-2-1-3" for a 16-team playoff). This model would essentially grant: Four automatic bids each to the SEC and Big Ten.Two automatic bids each to the ACC and Big 12.One automatic bid to the highest-ranked Group of Five conference champion.The remaining slots would be at-large bids.Why the SEC (and Big Ten) Pushed for This:Guaranteed Dominance: This model would cement the SEC's position at the top of college football, ensuring a significant presence in the playoff every year regardless of individual team performance bumps. It provides a built-in advantage in terms of playoff access.Revenue Maximization: More playoff teams directly translates to more revenue for the conference and its member schools. Given the massive new media rights deals and the impending direct athlete compensation model, maximizing CFP revenue is paramount.Reducing Selection Committee "Bias": There's a feeling within the SEC (and Big Ten) that the selection committee has, at times, overlooked strong teams from their conferences due to perceived inconsistencies in the "eye test" or a desire for broader representation. Guaranteeing more automatic bids would lessen the committee's power to exclude their top-tier teams.Strength of Conference Argument: SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey often argues that the SEC's strength of schedule is unmatched, and therefore, more of their teams deserve to be in the playoff even with more losses than teams from other conferences. Guaranteeing spots reflects this belief. He's also pointed to how the SEC gets numerous bids in other sports like basketball (e.g., 14 teams in March Madness), suggesting a similar recognition should apply to football.The Impact on the Big 12 and ACC (and Their Pushback):This "4-4-2-2-1" model would explicitly place the Big 12 and ACC in a subordinate position regarding CFP access. They would receive half the guaranteed bids of the SEC and Big Ten.Limited Access: Even if the Big 12 has a strong year with three or four highly competitive teams, only two would be guaranteed spots. The remaining teams would have to fight for very limited at-large bids, often against other highly-ranked SEC/Big Ten teams that didn't win their conference but still have top-tier resumes.Perceived "Second Class" Status: This structural disadvantage would reinforce a "second-tier" perception for the Big 12 and ACC within the Power Four, potentially impacting recruiting, media narratives, and long-term financial health."Earn it on the Field": Both Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark and ACC Commissioner Jim Phillips have vehemently opposed this model. Yormark, in particular, has pushed for the "5+11" model (five automatic qualifiers for the highest-ranked conference champions, 11 at-large bids), arguing that it's "fair" and promotes the idea of teams "earning it on the field" rather than receiving "gimmes" based on conference affiliation.Recent Developments and Shifting Sands:Interestingly, recent reports from the SEC's spring meetings indicate a potential shift in the SEC's stance. While the Big Ten remains bullish on the "4-4-2-2-1" model, the SEC, after discussions with its coaches (many of whom reportedly prefer the 5+11 model), is showing more openness to the "5+11" format. Some within the SEC even believe that the "5+11" model could ultimately lead to more SEC teams in the playoff in some years than the 4-AQ model, especially if the conference moves to a nine-game schedule, making their strength of schedule even more compelling for at-large bids.Regardless of the final decision, the SEC's initial push for double the automatic qualifiers of the Big 12 and ACC highlights its strategic goal: to maximize its presence and revenue in the sport's most lucrative postseason, even if it meant creating a distinct tier system within the top conferences.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 o

While there are valid concerns about the concentration of power in the SEC and Big Ten, there are also arguments to be made that their growing influence could have some positive outcomes for college football: Increased Financial Stability: The substantial media rights deals secured by the SEC and Big Ten provide unprecedented financial stability for their member institutions. This can lead to improved facilities, better resources for athletes, and increased investment in academic support. This could also lead to better player safety, with better medical care, and better equipment. Enhanced Player Welfare: The increased revenue generated by these conferences could lead to greater investment in player welfare, including improved healthcare, mental health services, and academic support. There is also the possibility of revenue sharing with the players, that would give the athletes more financial stability. Higher Level of Competition: The concentration of top talent in the SEC and Big Ten could lead to a higher overall level of competition. This could result in more exciting games and a more compelling product for fans. This will lead to a higher level of play, that will benefit the athletes. Standardization and Professionalization: The SEC and Big Ten's influence could lead to greater standardization of rules, regulations, and practices across college football. This could create a more professionalized environment, with improved officiating, better enforcement of rules, and a more consistent experience for fans. Increased National Attention: The dominance of the SEC and Big Ten could lead to increased national attention for college football, further enhancing its popularity and cultural significance. This increased attention, will lead to more revenue, which can be used to improve the sport. Potential for a More Streamlined Postseason: With the power that these two conferences hold, there is a chance that a more streamlined post season will emerge. This could lead to a better, and more exciting, playoff system. It's important to acknowledge that there are potential downsides to this concentration of power. However, it's also worth considering the potential benefits that could arise from the SEC and Big Ten's growing influence. Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors! NissanTake your adventures to new heights in the All-New Nissan Armada PRO-4X. Learn more at NissanUSA.com.Disclaimers:Optional features. Towing capacity varies by configuration. See Nissan Towing Guide and Owner’s Manual for additional information. Always secure cargo. Supply HouseJoin the Trade Master program today at SupplyHouse.com/TM and start ordering plumbing, HVAC, and electrical supplies with just a few clicks. Plus, use promo code SH5 for 5% off your first order. That’s SupplyHouse.com! ROYDownload the Roy app now from the App Store and start backing your favorite athletes the way they deserve—with transparency, trust, and a real impact. This is the future of college sports. Join it now by downloading Roy and supporting your favorite players! FanDuelRight now, new FanDuel customers can get ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS in Bonus Bets if your first FIVE DOLLAR bet wins!Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA. FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN) Follow & Subscribe on all Podcast platforms… 🎧 https://link.chtbl.com/LOBig12?sid=YouTube Locked On College Conferences, HBCU, Basketball & More 🎧 https://linktr.ee/LockedOnCollege Follow on Twitter: https://twitter.com/drakectoll Follow the show on Twitter: https://twitter.com/LOBig12 Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The sentiment that ESPN and other major networks are biased against the Big 12 Conference is a recurring and strong feeling among many Big 12 fans, athletic directors, and even its commissioner, Brett Yormark. While networks would argue their coverage is driven by viewership and market demand, the perception of bias stems from several key areas: 1. Dominance of SEC and Big Ten Narratives: Media Rights Focus: ESPN has an incredibly deep and financially lucrative partnership with the SEC, essentially operating the SEC Network and heavily featuring SEC content across its main channels. Similarly, FOX has made the Big Ten a central pillar of its college football coverage, especially for prime viewing slots. This financial investment naturally leads to a disproportionate amount of airtime, analysis, and promotional efforts dedicated to these two conferences. For Big 12 fans, it often feels like their league is an afterthought or relegated to less prominent channels and time slots. "Super Conference" Framing: The media often propagates a narrative that the SEC and Big Ten are the two "superconferences," with everyone else effectively battling for third place. This framing, while perhaps reflecting current financial realities, can diminish the perceived competitiveness and quality of the Big 12, regardless of on-field results. 2. Perceived Disadvantage in Playoff Selection and Rankings: CFP Model Debates: The recent debates over the College Football Playoff (CFP) expansion and format have significantly fueled this perception. Proposals that favored the SEC and Big Ten with more automatic qualifiers (e.g., four each) while limiting the Big 12 to fewer, even if it performs well, are seen as direct evidence of a systemic bias. Fans feel that if a Big 12 team has a comparable record to an SEC or Big Ten team, the latter often gets the benefit of the doubt in rankings and playoff consideration due to "conference strength," which is partly built by media narrative. ESPN's FPI Rankings: As recent reports indicate, ESPN's own Football Power Index (FPI) rankings have drawn criticism for what many perceive as a strong bias towards the SEC. For instance, the 2025 FPI showing an "astonishing 13 SEC teams in the top 25" including the top three, with the Big 12 only having two, makes Big 12 fans question the methodology and whether it inherently undervalues their conference while overvaluing SEC schedules or historical performance. This suggests a potential "self-fulfilling prophecy" where the model's emphasis on predictive metrics might amplify existing biases. 3. Quality of Coverage and Commentary: Less In-Depth Analysis: Some Big 12 fans feel that national broadcasts offer less in-depth analysis of their conference's teams, players, and storylines compared to the dominant leagues. Outdated Narratives: There's a lingering frustration that some national commentators still rely on outdated narratives about the Big 12, such as the idea of it being an "all offense, no defense" conference, even as the league's defensive play has improved. Dismissive Tone: Occasionally, fans perceive a dismissive or condescending tone from national commentators when discussing Big 12 teams or results, reinforcing the feeling that the conference isn't taken as seriously. 4. Big 12's Response: Commissioner Brett Yormark's Advocacy: Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark has been notably aggressive in promoting the Big 12 and challenging what he sees as unfair treatment. His outspokenness, particularly in advocating for a "5+11" CFP model (where conference champions earn their way in, rather than being guaranteed spots based on conference affiliation), is a direct response to this perceived bias and a push for greater fairness for the Big 12. He wants the Big 12 to "earn it on the field" and not be penalized by predetermined biases. In essence, while networks operate on business principles of ratings and marketability, the significant investment in, and heavy promotion of, the SEC and Big Ten by major networks like ESPN leads to a strong and understandable feeling among Big 12 fans that their conference faces an inherent bias, affecting everything from game selection to national perception and playoff access. Follow & Subscribe on all Podcast platforms… 🎧 https://link.chtbl.com/LOBig12?sid=YouTube Locked On College Conferences, HBCU, Basketball & More 🎧 https://linktr.ee/LockedOnCollege Follow on Twitter: https://twitter.com/drakectoll Follow the show on Twitter: https://twitter.com/LOBig12 Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The idea of a Big 12 and ACC merger is one of the more significant "what if" scenarios being discussed in college athletics realignment, particularly as a response to the dominance and increasing self-governance of the SEC and Big Ten. It's a complex proposition with many moving parts, especially concerning media rights.Here's what a Big 12-ACC merger could look like and why it's being considered:The Driving Force: Counterbalancing the SEC and Big TenThe primary motivation for a merger is to create a "third superconference" that could potentially compete financially and politically with the SEC and Big Ten. With the Big Ten and SEC reportedly pushing for a College Football Playoff (CFP) format that heavily favors their conferences with automatic bids, a combined Big 12-ACC entity would have significantly more leverage in future negotiations for media rights, CFP access, and overall college football governance.Key Challenges and Hurdles:The ACC Grant of Rights (GoR): This is the biggest obstacle. The ACC's Grant of Rights agreement binds its member schools' media rights to the conference through 2036. This means that even if a school leaves the ACC, the conference would retain the rights to their games' media revenue. The exit fee for leaving the ACC is also substantial, though recent lawsuits by Florida State and Clemson are challenging its enforceability. For a full merger to happen before 2036, it would likely require: Unraveling Media Deals: ESPN (ACC's partner) and Fox/ESPN (Big 12's partners) would need to agree to dissolve their current contracts and negotiate a new, potentially much larger, joint deal. This is a massive and complicated undertaking, as these networks already have "cut-rate deals" with the respective conferences.Legal Settlements: If any ACC schools are to leave, their lawsuits against the ACC regarding the GoR would need to be resolved, or the new merged entity would need to somehow absorb or pay those exit fees.Size and Logistics:Potential Scale: Combining the current Big 12 (16 teams) and the ACC (17 teams, including Notre Dame for some sports) would create a massive conference of 33 teams. This scale presents significant logistical challenges for scheduling, travel, and managing a single conference championship.Divisions/Pods: Such a large conference would almost certainly require multiple divisions or "pods" for competition. This could lead to a less unified conference identity and reduced frequency of play between all members.Cultural and Athletic Fit:Football vs. Basketball Focus: The ACC has historically been a strong basketball conference with traditional powers, while the Big 12 has often been seen as a football-first league with strong basketball. Merging these distinct cultures could present challenges, though both conferences certainly have strong programs in both sports.Geographic Sprawl: The combined geographic footprint would be vast, stretching from Florida and Boston in the east to Arizona and Utah in the west. This would significantly increase travel costs and logistical complexities for all sports.What a Merger Could Look Like (Hypothetical Scenarios):Given the GoR hurdle, a full, immediate merger might be less likely than other forms of cooperation or phased integration. However, if it were to happen, here are some possibilities:A "Super-League" with Divisions: A merged conference could establish regional divisions (e.g., East, Central, West) to manage travel and rivalries.Example: An "Atlantic Division" could include ACC East Coast schools, a "Central Division" could be former Big 12 heartland teams, and a "Mountain West" division could house the former Pac-12 additions.Tiered Revenue Sharing (Less Likely but Possible): While both the Big 12 and ACC currently have equal revenue sharing among full members, a massive merged league might explore a tiered system, though this often causes internal friction.Football/Basketball Splits (Highly Unlikely): Some have mused about a "football-only" merger or a basketball-focused merger, but given the current integrated nature of collegiate athletic departments and media deals tied to all sports, this is generally considered impractical.Strategic Poaching: Instead of a full merger, a more likely scenario (especially as the ACC's GoR theoretically weakens closer to 2036 or through ongoing lawsuits) is that the Big 12 would target specific, high-value ACC programs (e.g., Florida State, Clemson, Miami, North Carolina, Virginia, Duke, Louisville) to expand its footprint and increase its media value, effectively dismantling the ACC. This is a constant rumor and strategy being explored.Why it's still being discussed:Necessity: Many believe that remaining as standalone entities will leave the Big 12 and ACC too far behind the SEC and Big Ten in the long run, particularly with the new direct athlete compensation model.Brett Yormark's Ambition: Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark has proven aggressive and "open for business" in realignmen

The move to the Big 12 Conference for BYU and Houston, and specifically receiving full shares of the conference's revenue, is widely seen as a pivotal moment that will significantly boost their athletic programs, with the potential to elevate them to "powerhouse" status over time.Here's why getting a full share of Big 12 revenue is a game-changer for BYU and Houston:1. Massive Increase in Financial Resources:From Partial to Full Shares: For the 2024-2025 athletic year, BYU, Houston, UCF, and Cincinnati received partial Big 12 shares, estimated at around $19 million each. Starting with the 2025-2026 fiscal year, all 16 Big 12 schools, including BYU and Houston, will receive full and equal revenue shares from the conference's new media deal.Projected Revenue: This full share is originally estimated to be around $50 million each annually, including NCAA Tournament and bowl payouts. This is a substantial increase, representing a jump of over $30 million per year for both BYU and Houston compared to their previous partial shares.Comparable to P5 Peers: This full share revenue puts them on a much more comparable financial footing with established Power Four conference programs, allowing them to compete in areas where they previously faced significant budgetary disadvantages.2. Direct Athlete Compensation (Revenue Sharing):House v. NCAA Settlement Impact: The proposed House v. NCAA settlement allows schools to directly pay athletes for NIL, with a tentative annual cap of $20.5 million per school for the 2025-2026 fiscal year.Ability to Compete: This increased conference revenue is crucial for BYU and Houston to be able to afford to distribute the maximum allowable amount to their athletes. While the $20.5 million cap is a significant expense, receiving $50 million in conference revenue means they have the financial capability to meet or get very close to this new standard, which is essential for recruiting and retaining top talent. Houston, for example, has already announced intentions to share revenue with student-athletes at or close to the expected cap.3. Enhanced Recruiting Power:NIL Collectives: While the new revenue-sharing model will likely reduce the reliance on external NIL collectives, the ability for schools to directly pay athletes from conference revenue makes their recruiting pitches much stronger.Competitive Arms Race: Top recruits are increasingly drawn to programs that can offer competitive NIL opportunities and direct payments. Having a full Big 12 share allows BYU and Houston to directly compete with programs from other Power Four conferences for talent.Facilities and Staff: Increased revenue also means more investment in state-of-the-art facilities, larger and more specialized coaching and support staffs (strength and conditioning, nutrition, mental health), and recruiting budgets – all critical for attracting and developing elite athletes. Both BYU and Houston have been investing in their athletic facilities in recent years, and the increased revenue will accelerate these efforts.4. Sustained Visibility and Brand Growth:Consistent Exposure: Being in the Big 12 ensures consistent national television exposure and participation in a major conference championship race. This keeps BYU and Houston in the national conversation year-round.Attracting Sponsors: Higher visibility and a larger fan base generate more interest from corporate sponsors and donors, creating additional revenue streams beyond the conference distribution.Why "Powerhouses" is a realistic aspiration:BYU: Has a rich football tradition, a passionate national fanbase, and a strong institutional commitment to athletics. During its independence era, BYU actively sought to increase its revenue and maintain competitiveness, nearly doubling its athletic revenue between 2008-2010 and 2017-2019. Now, with a guaranteed Power Four revenue stream, they can build on that foundation and strategically invest to reclaim past glory. Their financial discipline during independence might even position them well to adapt to the new revenue-sharing model.Houston: Has historically been a "sleeping giant" with access to a massive talent pool in Texas. They have been aggressively investing in their athletic programs for years, including significant institutional support and fundraising efforts (like the "Houston Rise" campaign). Receiving a full Big 12 share validates and supercharges their long-standing ambition to be a national contender. They have already made significant investments in facilities like their Football Operations Center.While becoming a "powerhouse" isn't guaranteed overnight and requires sustained winning, strong coaching, and savvy program management, gaining a full share of Big 12 revenue provides BYU and Houston with the financial backbone to truly compete at the highest level of college football, making the aspiration a very realistic long-term goal. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about o

Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark has indeed been quite vocal this week, engaging in a rather pointed, albeit indirect, back-and-forth with SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey, primarily centered on the future format of the College Football Playoff (CFP). This unfolded during the respective spring meetings for their conferences. Here's a breakdown of the dynamic:Greg Sankey's Initial Jab: Ahead of the SEC's spring meetings, Greg Sankey made a public statement that was widely interpreted as a shot at the Big 12 and ACC commissioners. He said, "I don't need lectures from others about the good of the game — I don't lecture others about good of the game — or coordinating press releases about the good of the game." This was seen as a clear dismissal of any suggestions from other conferences regarding the direction of college football, implying that the SEC knows what's best. Brett Yormark's Response and Stance: When asked about Sankey's comments at the close of the Big 12's spring meetings in Orlando, Yormark responded with characteristic directness and a touch of dry wit:"I agreed with Greg's follow-up statement that I'd be entertained by it, and I was," Yormark deadpanned.He continued, "We all have thick skin here. But the neat thing about our relationship amongst the commissioners is we're going to battle. That's part of life. We're going to agree to disagree. We're kind of in that mode right now, but I have a lot of respect for my peers, and I know they have a lot of respect for me and Jim [Phillips, ACC Commissioner], and we'll end up in the right place."The Core of the "Battle": CFP Format: The underlying tension revolves around the College Football Playoff format.SEC/Big Ten's Initial Preference: The Big Ten and SEC had initially pushed for a model that would grant them significantly more automatic qualifiers (e.g., four each) into the expanded CFP, leaving fewer spots for other conferences.Yormark's Advocacy for 5+11: Brett Yormark has been a strong proponent of the "5+11" format, which would give automatic berths to the champions of the four "Power" conferences (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC) plus the highest-ranked Group of Five champion, with the remaining 11 spots being at-large selections by the CFP committee."Earn it on the Field": Yormark reiterated his support for the 5+11 model, emphasizing the Big 12's desire to "earn it on the field" rather than relying on "gimmes" or guaranteed spots based purely on conference affiliation. He stated that while the 5+11 format might not be "ideal" for the Big 12 (as it only guarantees one spot), it's "good for college football" and "what's fair."Public and Coach Momentum: Yormark also noted that the "public is voting yes for it" and that even SEC football coaches reportedly prefer the 5+11 model, suggesting a disconnect between some coaches and their conference leadership.Beyond the CFP: Scheduling Alliances: Yormark also subtly stood up to the SEC and Big Ten by dismissing the idea of the Big 12 entering into a scheduling alliance with any particular conference, as the SEC and Big Ten have discussed. He stated, "No. We're fine. We love our out-of-conference schedule. We don't necessarily have an alliance with any particular conference. We play them all." This reinforces the Big 12's independent path and its focus on broader competition rather than consolidating power with the two biggest leagues. In essence, Brett Yormark's actions this week demonstrated a clear resolve to advocate for what he believes is fair and beneficial for the broader landscape of college football, directly challenging the perceived power grab by the SEC and Big Ten in shaping the sport's future. He showed he's not intimidated by Sankey's rhetoric and is ready to "battle" for the Big 12's interests and the integrity of the game. Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Big 12 football is at a crossroads. With SEC politics heating up and the Big 12's competitive edge in question, what does the future hold for college football? Dive into the latest controversies surrounding BYU quarterback Jake Retzlaff's legal issues and Texas Tech booster Cody Campbell's financial influence. Hosts Drake Toll, Jake Catch, and others dissect Greg Sankey's SEC maneuvers, the implications of BYU's honor code, and the role of billionaire alumni like T. Boone Pickens in shaping the Big 12's destiny.Will the Big 12's strategic moves redefine the college football landscape? Tune in for expert analysis and insider perspectives on these pivotal developments. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Alex Foster, an 18-year-old defensive lineman for the Baylor University football team, died early on Wednesday, May 28, 2025.He was found with multiple gunshot wounds inside a car in his hometown of Greenville, Mississippi. Police had responded to reports of a shooting shortly after midnight. Foster was taken to a hospital where he died about 30 to 40 minutes later.His death was part of what Greenville Mayor Errick D. Simmons described as a "surge in violent crimes" in the city, which led to the implementation of a 9 p.m. to 6 a.m. curfew.Baylor University's athletic director, Mack Rhoades, and head coach Dave Aranda released a joint statement expressing their heartbreak and focusing on supporting Alex's family and teammates. Foster had redshirted last season and had participated in spring practices, with expectations to play a role in the upcoming 2025 season.As of now, no arrests have been made, and police are seeking information related to the shooting.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (T Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The likelihood of the Big Ten and SEC fully "leaving" the NCAA in football is increasingly high, though it's crucial to understand what that actually means. It's not about a complete, overnight, and literal secession from the entire NCAA organization for all sports. Instead, it's a strategic move towards de facto independence and self-governance for the highest-revenue sports, particularly football.Here's why this is the new likelihood:1. The House v. NCAA Settlement is a Game-Changer:Direct Athlete Pay: The recent House v. NCAA settlement (awaiting final court approval but being acted upon) fundamentally changes the financial model of college sports. It allows schools to directly pay athletes for their Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) through a revenue-sharing model, with an estimated cap of around $20.5 million per school annually. This is a massive shift from the NCAA's traditional amateurism model.Liability Shift: The settlement also addresses billions in back-pay damages, with the NCAA and conferences sharing the burden. This financial liability is driving the richest conferences to seek greater control and reduce their exposure to future antitrust lawsuits.Enforcement Handover: Crucially, the settlement outlines a new enforcement regime where oversight of NIL deals and the revenue-sharing cap will largely shift from the NCAA to the Power Four conferences (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC) through a newly created Settlement Enforcement Committee.2. Creation of the College Sports Commission (CSC) and "Power Four" Governance:A New Governing Body: Reports indicate that the Power Four conferences are actively working to establish a new entity, the College Sports Commission (CSC). This commission would effectively take over many of the regulatory and enforcement duties for football and men's basketball that the NCAA currently nominally holds.Direct Control: The Big Ten and SEC (often in alignment with the ACC and Big 12, though sometimes in opposition) want direct control over critical aspects like:NIL Regulation: Enforcing the revenue-sharing cap and scrutinizing third-party NIL deals to prevent illicit "pay-for-play."Roster Limits: Setting rules for roster sizes to manage costs under the new revenue-sharing model.Transfer Portal Rules: Potentially creating their own rules for player transfers to bring more stability.Waiving Right to Sue: Institutions that join this new commission would reportedly waive their right to sue the commission, providing a legal shield that the NCAA currently lacks.3. Diminished NCAA Authority and Enforcement:Legal Defeats: Years of antitrust lawsuits have stripped the NCAA of its ability to truly enforce rules around athlete compensation. State NIL laws have further eroded its power.Irrelevance in Top Football: The NCAA has long lacked direct authority over the College Football Playoff (CFP), which is the primary driver of revenue and national interest in the sport. The CFP is governed by the conferences.SEC Commissioner's Statements: SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey has openly voiced frustration, stating he's "looking for ideas to move us forward" and has even noted that people in his "room" are asking, "Why are we still in the NCAA?" This reflects a strong sentiment within the SEC for more autonomy.4. College Football Playoff Control:SEC/Big Ten Dominance: The Big Ten and SEC are leveraging their power and influence over the CFP's future format. They've pushed for a 16-team playoff structure where they would receive significantly more automatic bids (e.g., four each) compared to the Big 12 and ACC (two each), and the Group of Five (one). This direct control over the sport's most lucrative postseason further cements their move towards independent governance.What this means for "leaving":The Big Ten and SEC aren't likely to hold a press conference announcing they're no longer "NCAA members." Instead, the "leaving" will manifest as:De Facto Separate Governing Bodies: For football (and likely men's basketball), the Power Four conferences will essentially operate under their own rules, enforced by the CSC, separate from the NCAA's broader governance structure.NCAA Becomes a "Holder" for Other Sports: The NCAA would likely continue to oversee academic eligibility, compliance for non-revenue sports ("Olympic sports"), and championships for those sports. Its role would be significantly reduced to that of a facilitator for the vast majority of collegiate athletics outside of the top-tier football and basketball.Financial Disconnect: The enormous revenues generated by football and men's basketball (especially media rights and CFP payouts) will be almost entirely controlled by the Power Four conferences, with minimal or no direct flow through the NCAA's traditional distribution models.In essence, the "likelihood" isn't a dramatic walk-out, but rather a gradual but decisive shift of power that will render the NCAA largely irrelevant in the governance and financial oversight of college football's elit

The potential absence of Jake Retzlaff, especially as the presumed starting quarterback, significantly impacts BYU's outlook for the 2024 Big 12 football season and likely dampens any aspirations of being a "real contender" for the conference championship.Here's why his potential absence changes the Big 12 landscape for BYU:1. Loss of Experience and Leadership:Known Quantity: Retzlaff, despite his limited starts at BYU, was the most experienced quarterback on the roster with Power Five game action. He showed flashes of high-level play, particularly his ability to make plays with his arm and legs under pressure.Leadership Vacuum: A starting quarterback is inherently a leader, both on and off the field. Losing that established presence, even if it's a relatively new one, creates a void that is difficult to fill, especially with the high stakes of a Big 12 schedule.2. Reliance on Unproven Talent:New Starters: As discussed, BYU would likely turn to McCae Hillstead, Treyson Bourguet, or potentially true freshman Bear Bachmeier. While each has talent and potential, none have proven themselves as consistent Big 12 starting quarterbacks.Learning Curve: The Big 12 is a tough, competitive conference. Asking a new, relatively inexperienced quarterback to step in and lead a team to a championship requires an extremely quick learning curve and a high level of performance from day one, which is a tall order.3. Impact on Offensive Cohesion:Chemistry: An offense thrives on rhythm and chemistry between the quarterback and his receivers and offensive line. A change at quarterback, especially a sudden one, can disrupt this cohesion and lead to early struggles in timing and execution.Play-Calling Adjustments: Offensive coordinator Aaron Roderick might have to adjust play-calling to suit the strengths of a different quarterback, potentially moving away from concepts that Retzlaff was best suited for.4. The Big 12 Landscape is Already Tough:No Clear Dominator (Yet): While Texas and Oklahoma have departed for the SEC, the Big 12 remains a deeply competitive conference with several strong programs. Teams like Utah (new to the Big 12), Kansas State, Oklahoma State, and Arizona have strong returning talent and coaching.Increased Competition: The addition of former Pac-12 teams like Utah, Arizona, Arizona State, and Colorado intensifies the competition. BYU's second year in the conference was already expected to be challenging as teams get more familiar with them.Preseason Odds: Even with Retzlaff, BYU was often projected in the middle or lower-middle tier of the Big 12 by preseason prognosticators and oddsmakers. His absence would likely cause those projections to drop further.Conclusion: BYU's Contention Hopes DiminishedWhile BYU's coaching staff is adept at developing quarterbacks and the team has other talent on the roster (like a strong receiving corps and an improving offensive line), the loss of the presumed starting quarterback to an off-field issue of this magnitude is a significant blow to their immediate Big 12 championship aspirations. It makes it very difficult for them to be considered a "real contender" in 2024.Instead of competing for a conference title, the focus would likely shift to developing the new quarterback, becoming bowl-eligible, and aiming for a respectable finish in the Big 12. The Big 12 title race, therefore, becomes "wide open" in the sense that one less team (BYU) is seen as having a clear path to the top, making the path for other established or rising programs more accessible.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (T Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

There are various discussions and rumors circulating regarding Jake Retzlaff's status for the upcoming fall football season, particularly in light of the recent civil lawsuit filed against him.Here's a breakdown of the situation and the basis for the speculation about him not playing:Civil Lawsuit Allegations: The primary and most concrete reason for the "rumors" about him not playing is the civil lawsuit filed on May 21, 2025, by Jane Doe A.G. The lawsuit accuses Retzlaff of sexual assault, battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress stemming from an alleged incident in November 2023. These are very serious allegations, and even though they are part of a civil suit and no criminal charges have been filed, they cast a significant shadow over his immediate future with the team.BYU's Honor Code and Title IX Process: As discussed previously, BYU has a strict Honor Code and a robust Title IX process.Honor Code Investigation: The university's Honor Code Office will likely conduct its own independent investigation into the allegations. If they find that Retzlaff violated the Honor Code, disciplinary actions (separate from any legal outcomes) could range from probation to suspension or even expulsion. Suspension from the university would directly prevent him from playing football.Title IX Investigation: The Title IX office will also conduct an investigation to determine if university policy regarding sexual misconduct was violated. The outcome of this investigation could also lead to disciplinary measures that affect his eligibility to play.Interim Measures: In some cases, universities may implement interim measures during an ongoing investigation, which could include temporarily suspending a student or athlete from activities to ensure safety or to prevent further disruption. While not confirmed, this is a possibility in high-profile cases.Team and Coaching Staff Decisions: Regardless of legal or university disciplinary outcomes, the BYU coaching staff and athletic department will need to make a decision about Retzlaff's status. The presence of such serious allegations can be a major distraction for the team and impact team chemistry and public perception. Even if he is not officially suspended by the university, the coaching staff might choose to sideline him while the legal process and internal investigations unfold.Media and Public Scrutiny: As a starting quarterback at a high-profile religious institution, Retzlaff is under intense public and media scrutiny. The pressure on BYU to address the situation appropriately is immense, which could influence decisions regarding his playing status.Why the "Won't Play" Rumors are Strong:The combination of the serious nature of the allegations, BYU's strict internal policies (Honor Code and Title IX), and the potential for significant reputational damage means that there is a strong possibility Retzlaff will not be on the field for the fall season, at least until there is greater clarity on the civil lawsuit and the university's internal investigations are complete. Even if found not liable in the civil suit, or if no criminal charges are filed, the internal BYU processes could still lead to disciplinary action.It's important to remember that these are "rumors" in the sense that no official statement has been made by BYU or the football program regarding his playing status for the fall season. However, the underlying reasons for such speculation are rooted in the legal and institutional challenges he currently faces. There are strong indications and ongoing discussions suggesting that Jake Retzlaff may not play for BYU in the upcoming fall football season, primarily due to the serious civil lawsuit filed against him. While no official statement has been made by BYU or the football program regarding his playing status, the "rumors" stem from several significant factors:Civil Lawsuit Allegations: A civil lawsuit was filed on Wednesday, May 21, 2025, accusing Jake Retzlaff of sexual assault, battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress based on an alleged incident in November 2023. The plaintiff claims Retzlaff "raped, strangled, and bit" her. Such severe allegations, even in a civil context and without criminal charges, create an immediate and substantial issue for his involvement with the team. Retzlaff's attorney has stated his client's "factual innocence" and that his focus this year will be on football.BYU's Honor Code and Title IX Process:Honor Code Investigation: As a student at BYU, Retzlaff is subject to the university's Honor Code. Any alleged violation of this code can trigger an independent internal investigation by the Honor Code Office. If a violation is found, potential disciplinary actions by the university could include probation, suspension, or expulsion. A suspension or expulsion would directly prevent him from playing.Title IX Investigation: BYU has stated it is "following all processes and guidelines mandated by Title IX." Thi

The civil lawsuit filed against BYU quarterback Jake Retzlaff, accusing him of sexual assault, brings to light the unique complexities and potential additional scrutiny that can arise for athletes at institutions with strong religious affiliations, such as Brigham Young University (BYU) and its connection to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS).Here's how BYU's LDS affiliation and associated policies could create distinct challenges for Jake Retzlaff in this situation:The BYU Honor Code:Dual Accountability: All BYU students, including athletes, agree to abide by the university's Honor Code, which outlines standards of conduct consistent with the principles of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. These standards extend beyond legal compliance and include expectations regarding integrity, chastity, and respect for others.Internal Investigation and Sanctions: Even if no criminal charges are filed or if a civil case has a particular outcome, the university's Honor Code Office can conduct its own investigation into alleged violations. If a violation is found, disciplinary actions can range from probation to suspension or even expulsion from the university. This process is entirely separate from the legal system and can have significant consequences for a student's academic and athletic career at BYU. For an athlete, this could mean being removed from the team or losing scholarship opportunities, regardless of the legal outcome.Title IX Compliance:University's Obligation: As a recipient of federal funding, BYU is obligated to comply with Title IX, which prohibits sex-based discrimination, including sexual harassment and assault, in educational programs and activities. BYU has stated they are following "all processes and guidelines mandated by Title IX."Independent Process: The university's Title IX office will conduct its own investigation into the allegations. This investigation aims to determine if university policy was violated and to ensure a safe educational environment. The findings of a Title IX investigation are independent of criminal or civil court proceedings.Increased Public and Media Scrutiny:Moral Expectations: BYU, given its religious mission, often faces higher public and media expectations regarding the moral conduct of its students and athletes. Allegations of this nature against a prominent player like a starting quarterback can draw intense scrutiny not only on the individual but also on the university and its values.Reputational Impact: The university's reputation, closely tied to its religious identity, can be significantly impacted by such high-profile cases. This can lead to increased pressure on the university to act decisively and transparently, which in turn can intensify the focus on the accused individual.In summary, while any athlete facing serious allegations would contend with legal and personal challenges, Jake Retzlaff's situation at BYU is compounded by the university's unique Honor Code and its religious affiliation. These factors introduce additional layers of potential internal university investigations and disciplinary actions, alongside heightened public and media scrutiny, which are distinct from what might be experienced at a secular institution.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Is a 16-team college football playoff the game-changer the Big 12 needs? Dive into the buzz as the Big 12 Squad tackles this hot topic, exploring the potential impact on the Florida Gators and other powerhouse teams. With Chris Level and Drake leading the charge, the conversation heats up around the playoff proposal, beer sales at college stadiums, and Texas A&M's challenging year.Drake's new perm sparks laughter, setting a lighthearted tone as the group debates the financial windfall of selling beer, citing Clemson's success with the Savannah Bananas. The discussion shifts to Texas A&M's struggles, with Drake labeling it a "devastating athletic year."Join the conversation for insider insights and lively banter. Tune in to catch the full breakdown and see if your favorite team is ready for the playoff shake-up! Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The civil lawsuit filed on Wednesday, May 21, 2025, accusing BYU quarterback Jake Retzlaff of sexual assault in November 2023, casts a very dark shadow over his collegiate football career, making it highly probable that his time at BYU is effectively over, regardless of the eventual legal outcome.Here's why his career at BYU is likely done:BYU's Strict Honor Code: Brigham Young University operates under a rigorous Honor Code, which all students, including athletes, are required to uphold. This code encompasses a wide range of conduct, including prohibitions against sexual harassment, sexual assault, and premarital/extramarital sexual relations. Allegations of this nature, even in a civil suit and without criminal charges, directly violate the spirit and letter of the Honor Code. BYU's official stance is that it takes "any allegation very seriously, following all processes and guidelines mandated by Title IX."Past Precedent of Dismissals: BYU has a history of disciplining athletes for Honor Code violations, even those not involving criminal charges. A notable example is Brandon Davies, who was dismissed from the basketball team in 2011 after admitting to sexual relations in violation of the Honor Code. While each case is unique, this precedent demonstrates BYU's willingness to act decisively on such matters.Optics and Institutional Image: Regardless of legal innocence or guilt, the mere public accusation of sexual assault against a starting quarterback creates a significant public relations crisis for BYU, an institution closely tied to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Maintaining a clean image and upholding its moral standards is paramount for the university. Having a high-profile athlete facing such a serious civil lawsuit, even if he were to be found "factually innocent" as his lawyer claims, creates a level of scrutiny and potential distraction that the university is unlikely to tolerate for its public face.Distraction to the Program: A civil lawsuit of this magnitude, with its associated media attention and potential for ongoing legal proceedings, would be an immense distraction for the football program, his teammates, coaches, and the university as a whole. Maintaining focus and unity under such circumstances would be exceedingly difficult.Separate from Criminal Proceedings: It's crucial to note that BYU's Honor Code investigation and potential disciplinary actions are separate from any criminal investigation. Even if criminal charges are not filed or if Retzlaff is found not guilty in a criminal court, BYU can (and has in the past) still take disciplinary action, including dismissal, based on its own Honor Code review processes.University Statement: BYU's official statement acknowledges awareness of the civil lawsuit and emphasizes that the university "takes any allegation very seriously, following all processes and guidelines mandated by Title IX." While they state they cannot provide additional comment due to privacy laws, this indicates an internal review is underway.Even with his attorney asserting his innocence, the nature and severity of the allegations, combined with BYU's unique institutional values and history of strict enforcement, make it highly improbable that Jake Retzlaff will continue to be part of the BYU football program, or remain enrolled at the university, as the legal process unfolds and the Honor Code review concludes. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Reports and observations from the spring transfer portal window and general NIL discussions indicate that BYU and Texas Tech are indeed making significant waves and are perceived by many as "killing it" in the NIL category within the Big 12 Conference. This success is attracting attention and, in some cases, envy from rival Big 12 programs.Here's why BYU and Texas Tech are seen as excelling in NIL:Texas Tech: Aggressive Investment and Strategic Use of the PortalTop-Ranked Transfer Class: Texas Tech consistently leads the Big 12 in the 2025 transfer portal rankings, with outlets like On3 and 247Sports highlighting their success. They've secured a large number of highly-rated transfers, particularly in football, making them a significant player in talent acquisition. Substantial NIL Spending: Reports, including one from ESPN, indicate that Texas Tech has invested heavily in NIL to secure these transfers, with figures surpassing $10 million for their 2025 winter transfer class alone. This puts them in a tier with some of the sport's premier schools in terms of NIL expenditure for portal players. Billionaire Backing and "Championship-or-Bust" Mentality: The aggressive NIL approach is reportedly backed by significant donor support, including a "billionaire's backing," which fuels a "championship-or-bust" mentality for the upcoming season. This financial muscle allows them to compete for top talent effectively.Strategic Acquisitions: Texas Tech hasn't just spent money; they've spent it strategically. They've brought in an influx of offensive line talent and top defensive players, addressing critical needs and aiming to become instant conference title contenders. For example, they secured high-profile players who were also considering traditional powerhouses, often due to aggressive seven-figure NIL offers. BYU: Quiet Success, Deep Connections, and Broad ReachLanding Coveted Recruits: BYU has been quietly, yet very successfully, navigating the complicated NIL landscape. They're landing some of the most coveted and expensive recruits in both football and basketball, including high-profile basketball commitments.Leveraging Fan Base and Network: BYU has a unique and deeply committed global fanbase, largely tied to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. This network provides a vast and passionate donor base that has mobilized for NIL collectives, creating significant financial opportunities for athletes. "Leveling the Playing Field": From BYU's perspective, this new NIL money is seen by many fans as leveling the playing field with traditional athletic powers, especially given their historical status as an independent before joining the Big 12.Multi-Sport Success: BYU's NIL success isn't limited to football. There have been reports of significant NIL investments attracting top talent across multiple sports, including six-figure deals for men's golf players and high-profile basketball commitments. This indicates a broad-based, well-funded NIL effort. Adaptability and Proactive Approach: BYU appears to have been ready for the NIL changes, establishing programs to develop players not just on the field but in every phase of life, suggesting a proactive and strategic embrace of the NIL era. Why Rivals are Envious or Awestruck:The combined success of BYU and Texas Tech in leveraging NIL to attract top talent, particularly through the transfer portal, has led to a perception that they are outpacing many of their Big 12 counterparts. This creates a mix of admiration for their innovative approaches and perhaps some frustration or apprehension from other programs that might not have the same level of NIL resources or strategic effectiveness. The shift in talent acquisition could significantly impact the competitive balance within the conference.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Recent news regarding BYU quarterback Jake Retzlaff involves a civil lawsuit filed on Wednesday, May 21, 2025, accusing him of sexually assaulting a woman in November 2023. According to the lawsuit, which was filed in 3rd District Court by a woman from Salt Lake County, the incident allegedly occurred at Retzlaff's home. The lawsuit claims that the woman and a friend went to Retzlaff's apartment to hang out and play video games. After her friend left, the woman states that Retzlaff "raped, strangled, and bit" her. The lawsuit alleges that after she and Retzlaff began kissing, she "did not want to do anything more," but Retzlaff continued to "escalate" the situation, inappropriately touching her and causing her pain. She claims her reaction made Retzlaff angry and he "started to shout at her." The woman tried to call someone but her phone was dead, so she plugged it in and waited for it to charge. The lawsuit states that when she tried to leave after Retzlaff briefly fell asleep, he woke up, pushed her back onto the bed, and continued to forcefully kiss and touch her. She alleges he bit her lip, leaving a cut, and then "put his hands around her neck" before sexually assaulting her. The woman reportedly went to a local hospital days later for a rape kit examination. She also reported the incident to the Provo Police Department, but initially did not name Retzlaff due to fear. She later identified him after a Provo police officer contacted her, stating that "someone else filed a complaint against a football player and the police wanted to see if it was the same person." As of Wednesday, May 21, 2025, no criminal charges have been filed against Retzlaff. Retzlaff's attorney, Mark Baute, issued a statement in response to the lawsuit, asserting his client's innocence. Baute stated, "He is also factually innocent, and we look forward to proving that innocence. Jake's focus this year will be on football. We don't try cases in the media. We will respect the process and establish Jake's innocence through the judicial system." The lawsuit accuses Retzlaff of battery, assault, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, and seeks damages greater than $300,000 for each count. Jake Retzlaff is a key player for BYU, having started all 13 games for the Cougars in 2024, leading them to an 11-2 record. Sources and related content Follow & Subscribe on all Podcast platforms… 🎧 https://link.chtbl.com/LOBig12?sid=YouTube Locked On College Conferences, HBCU, Basketball & More 🎧 https://linktr.ee/LockedOnCollege Follow on Twitter: https://twitter.com/drakectoll Follow the show on Twitter: https://twitter.com/LOBig12 Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The idea of Power Four teams breaking away from the NCAA entirely is gaining significant traction, particularly in the wake of recent legal rulings and the ongoing restructuring of college athletics. The Tennessee government's ruling, often referred to as the Tennessee NIL law, is a prime example of a state-level action that fundamentally challenges the NCAA's authority and provides a strong impetus for the top conferences to seek greater autonomy or even outright secession.Here's why Power Four teams, particularly those in the SEC and Big Ten, might want to break away from the NCAA:1. Loss of NCAA Authority and Enforcement Power:Antitrust Rulings: The NCAA has faced a barrage of antitrust lawsuits, most notably the House v. NCAA settlement. These legal defeats have stripped the NCAA of its ability to regulate Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) and effectively prohibit direct compensation to athletes. The Tennessee lawsuit, specifically, successfully challenged the NCAA's NIL recruiting ban and received a permanent injunction, further weakening the NCAA's enforcement capabilities. State Laws Defying NCAA: The Tennessee NIL law is particularly aggressive. It protects in-state universities from NCAA penalties for circumventing rules (like revenue sharing caps or NIL restrictions) if those rules violate state law. This effectively puts state law above NCAA rules for Tennessee schools, creating a precedent that other states may follow. "Wild West" Era: The lack of consistent and enforceable rules across the board has led to what many describe as a "Wild West" environment in college sports, particularly concerning NIL and the transfer portal. Power Four conferences feel they need more control to manage this chaos. 2. Financial Liability and the House Settlement:Massive Payouts: The House v. NCAA settlement involves nearly $2.8 billion in back pay to former and current athletes, with the NCAA and conferences sharing the burden. This immense financial liability makes the Power Four wary of future lawsuits and seeks to distance themselves from a governing body that exposes them to such risks. Shifting Liability: The new Tennessee law specifically states that the NCAA "shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the state, its institutions, and intercollegiate athletes from any damages, losses, claims, or remedies of any kind arising from its noncompliance or failure under such applicable law." This is a direct attempt to shift legal liability from the schools to the NCAA, giving Power Four schools a strong reason to consider severing ties. 3. Desire for Self-Governance and Revenue Control:"College Sports Commission" (CSC): In response to the House settlement and state challenges, the Power Four conferences (SEC, Big Ten, ACC, Big 12) are reportedly circulating a binding document to create a new entity, the "College Sports Commission" (CSC). This commission would primarily be in charge of regulating the new revenue-sharing model (up to a $20.5 million cap per school) and scrutinizing NIL deals. Direct Payments and Roster Limits: The House settlement allows schools to directly pay athletes. The Power Four want to control how this is implemented, including potential hard roster limits to manage costs and ensure fair distribution. They don't want the NCAA dictating these core financial and operational aspects. Focus on Core Business: If the CSC takes over player compensation and related enforcement, the NCAA would be freed up to focus on its more traditional roles like academic eligibility, sports betting integrity, and running championships for all divisions. This division of labor could be seen as beneficial by the Power Four, allowing them to manage their primary revenue-generating sports with more autonomy. 4. Perception of Amateurism is Dead (for the Power Four):With direct payments, revenue sharing, and NIL, the concept of "amateurism" as traditionally defined by the NCAA is effectively gone for the Power Four's major sports. Continuing to operate under a body that historically championed amateurism, yet can't enforce it, becomes a contradiction. The Power Four want to move forward with a professionalized model for their revenue-generating sports without the legal and philosophical baggage of the old amateur system.5. Consolidation of Power:The reality is that the SEC and Big Ten, and increasingly the Big 12 and ACC, control the vast majority of college football's revenue and viewership. They feel they should have the commensurate power to govern themselves without being beholden to a larger body that includes hundreds of smaller schools with different priorities and financial realities.Breaking away entirely would allow them to create rules and structures that solely benefit their elite programs, potentially without having to compromise with the diverse interests of the entire NCAA membership.In essence, the Tennessee ruling is a significant shot across the NCAA's bow, as it provides a legal framework for schools to de

Here's a breakdown of how the Big 12 could potentially use private equity to facilitate the acquisition of schools like Clemson and Florida State from the ACC:The Private Equity Angle:Big 12's Interest in Private Equity: Commissioner Brett Yormark has openly explored the possibility of private equity investment in the Big 12 Conference itself. This signals a willingness to consider unconventional financial strategies to enhance the conference's financial standing and competitiveness. Private Equity's Growing Interest in College Sports: Private equity firms are increasingly recognizing the revenue-generating potential of college athletics, particularly the major football programs and conferences. They see opportunities for investment and significant returns.Structuring a Deal: A private equity firm could potentially partner with the Big 12 (or a newly formed entity involving the Big 12) to provide a substantial upfront capital investment. This capital could then be used to directly pay a portion or all of Clemson's and Florida State's exit fees from the ACC.The Mechanics of a Potential Buyout:Assessment of Exit Fees: The first step would involve a clear understanding of the exact buyout amounts required for Clemson and Florida State to leave the ACC. While the figure decreases over time, an immediate departure would still be substantial (though less than the initially reported hundreds of millions).Private Equity Investment: The Big 12, or a related entity, would secure a significant investment from a private equity firm. The structure of this deal could vary, but it might involve the private equity firm taking a stake in future Big 12 revenues, media rights, or a newly created commercial arm of the conference.Direct Payment to ACC: A portion of the private equity investment would be earmarked to directly pay the ACC the negotiated exit fees for Clemson and Florida State. This would alleviate the immediate financial burden on the departing schools.Incentivizing the Schools: The Big 12, potentially with the backing of private equity, would need to offer a compelling financial package to Clemson and Florida State that outweighs the benefits of staying in the ACC and compensates them for the disruption of a conference change. This would likely involve promises of higher future revenues within the Big 12.Benefits for the Big 12:Instant Prestige and Competitiveness: Adding powerhouse programs like Clemson and Florida State would immediately elevate the Big 12's national profile, on-field competitiveness, and attractiveness to fans and media.Increased Media Rights Value: The inclusion of these high-profile brands would significantly increase the Big 12's negotiating leverage for future media rights deals, potentially rivaling or surpassing the SEC and Big Ten.Long-Term Stability: Securing the commitment of elite programs would provide the Big 12 with greater long-term stability in a rapidly changing college athletics landscape.Strategic Geographic Expansion: While not in the traditional Big 12 footprint, adding Florida State provides a presence in a key southern state, and Clemson strengthens the conference's reach in the Southeast.Benefits for Clemson and Florida State:Potential for Higher Revenue: The primary motivation for leaving the ACC is the perceived revenue gap with the SEC and Big Ten. The Big 12, potentially boosted by private equity, would need to offer a pathway to significantly higher payouts.New Competitive Landscape: A move to a potentially strengthened Big 12 could offer new competitive challenges and opportunities for national championship contention.Freedom from ACC Grant of Rights: While a buyout would address the immediate financial hurdle, the long-term benefit is escaping the ACC's Grant of Rights, providing more flexibility in the future.Challenges and Considerations:Private Equity Terms: The terms of the private equity investment would be crucial. The Big 12 would need to ensure the deal doesn't unduly compromise its future revenue streams or control.ACC Resistance: The ACC would likely fight hard to retain its premier programs and could potentially pursue legal action or attempt to negotiate counter-offers.Other Potential Suitors: The SEC or Big Ten could also be interested in Clemson and Florida State, creating a competitive recruitment scenario.Long-Term Viability of Private Equity in College Sports: The long-term impact and sustainability of private equity involvement in college athletics are still evolving and could present unforeseen challenges.Conclusion:Using private equity to facilitate the acquisition of Clemson and Florida State is a bold and potentially transformative strategy the Big 12 could explore. The decreasing ACC buyout provides a window of opportunity, and private equity offers a means to overcome the immediate financial hurdle. However, the feasibility and success of such a move would depend on complex negotiations, the appetite of private equity firms, the willingnes

The recent settlement regarding the ACC's Grant of Rights and the decreasing buyout figure leading up to 2030 is indeed fueling speculation about potential future conference realignment. The Big 12, under the assertive leadership of Commissioner Brett Yormark, has consistently stated it is "open for business," and the evolving ACC situation could present an opportunity.Here's why the ACC's 2030 buyout could incentivize the Big 12 to aggressively pursue schools like Miami and Louisville:The Decreasing Buyout as a Window:Manageable Exit Fee: The reported decrease in the ACC exit fee to $75 million in 2030 (and becoming more manageable in the years leading up to it) makes leaving the conference a more palatable financial decision for potential defectors. This is significantly lower than the exorbitant figures initially discussed.Strategic Timing: The 2030 timeframe aligns roughly with the expiration of current media rights deals for other conferences, potentially creating a broader landscape of realignment and negotiation. The Big 12 would want to position itself strategically before this period.Why Miami and Louisville are Attractive Targets for the Big 12:Miami:Large Media Market: Miami is a significant and valuable media market in Florida, a state with a deep passion for college football. This would expand the Big 12's footprint into a new and fertile region.Strong Athletic Brand (Potential): While inconsistent in recent years, Miami has a historically strong athletic brand with national recognition, particularly in football. Revitalizing that brand within the Big 12 could be a major draw.Recruiting Hotbed: South Florida is a talent-rich recruiting area, providing Big 12 programs with increased access to elite high school players.Louisville:Solid Football and Basketball Programs: Louisville has consistently competitive programs in both football and men's basketball, two key revenue-generating sports.Geographic Fit (Relative): While not in the traditional Big 12 footprint, Kentucky is a bordering state with existing Big 12 ties through West Virginia. Adding Louisville would strengthen the conference's presence in the Midwest/Appalachian region.Passionate Fanbase: Louisville boasts a dedicated and passionate fanbase that would likely travel and engage with the Big 12.The Big 12's Potential Motivation:Strengthening Conference Stability and Value: Adding strong programs like Miami and Louisville would further solidify the Big 12's position as a major power conference in the evolving landscape of college athletics, enhancing its media rights value.Strategic Expansion: Targeting these specific schools allows the Big 12 to expand into key geographic areas and tap into new fan bases and recruiting territories.Countering SEC and Big Ten Dominance: By proactively pursuing quality additions, the Big 12 can work to close the perceived gap in revenue and prestige with the SEC and Big Ten.Exploiting ACC Vulnerability: The uncertainty surrounding the ACC's long-term stability due to the Grant of Rights and revenue distribution model presents an opportunity for the Big 12 to poach valuable assets.The Push:Given these factors, it's plausible that the Big 12, led by a forward-thinking commissioner like Brett Yormark, would be actively monitoring the situation in the ACC and strategically positioning itself to make a move for desirable programs like Miami and Louisville as the 2030 buyout window approaches and becomes more financially feasible. This aggressive approach would align with the Big 12's recent expansion efforts and its stated goal of being a top-tier conference.However, it's important to remember that these are strategic considerations and potential motivations. Actual conference realignment is a complex process involving numerous factors and negotiations that occur behind closed doors.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The Utah fanbase is proving to be a valuable and important asset to the Big 12 Conference for several key reasons:Strong and Loyal Following:Consistent Attendance: Even before joining the Big 12, the Utah Utes consistently boasted strong attendance figures for their football and basketball programs. This dedicated fanbase travels well and creates an energetic atmosphere at home games, adding to the overall gameday experience within the conference.Passionate Support: Utes fans are known for their deep passion for their teams. This enthusiasm translates to strong engagement both online and in person, contributing to the overall buzz and excitement surrounding Big 12 competitions.Media Market Value:Salt Lake City Market: The Salt Lake City metropolitan area is a growing media market. Including a team with a strong following in this region expands the Big 12's reach and potential viewership, making the conference more attractive to television partners.Increased Exposure: Utah's presence in the Big 12 provides the conference with a foothold in the Mountain West region, potentially drawing in more viewers and fans from that part of the country.Competitive Programs Elevating the Conference:Football Success: The Utah football program, under Coach Kyle Whittingham, has been consistently competitive, winning multiple Pac-12 South titles and earning Rose Bowl appearances. Their continued success in the Big 12 elevates the conference's overall strength and national perception. A strong Utah program provides compelling matchups and storylines for the league. Basketball Potential: While working to achieve consistent dominance in basketball, the Utes have the potential to be a strong program in a conference widely considered one of the best in the nation for men's basketball. A successful Utah basketball team adds another layer of competitiveness and interest to the Big 12.Rivalry and Storyline Potential:"Holy War" with BYU: The intense rivalry between Utah and BYU is now a conference matchup, adding a built-in, highly anticipated game to the Big 12 schedule annually. This rivalry generates significant local and national interest. New Conference Dynamics: Utah's arrival brings new dynamics and potential rivalries within the Big 12, creating fresh storylines and engaging content for fans.Overall Contribution:The Utah fanbase brings a combination of consistent support, media market value, and passion to the Big 12. Coupled with competitive athletic programs, particularly in football, the Utes are a valuable addition that enhances the conference's strength, visibility, and overall appeal to fans and media partners. Their enthusiastic following contributes to the vibrant and competitive landscape the Big 12 is aiming to cultivate.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Amazon Fire TV Stick 4kDid you know your Fire TV is also an Xbox? Turn any TV into your gaming and entertainment hub with Fire TV Stick 4K devices — no console required. Head to Amazon.com/firetvlockedon to get started. Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscription and compatible controller required.Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year.WayFairAfter the holiday hustle, there’s nothing like giving your home a little TLC. Give your home the refresh it needs with Wayfair. Head to Wayfair.com right now. Wayfair. Every style. Every home.GametimeDownload the Gametime app, create an account, and use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE for $20 off your first purchase. Terms apply. Download Gametime today. What time is it? Gametime.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Can the Big 12's quarterback talent redefine college football's competitive landscape? With standout players like Sam Levitt and Sawyer Robertson leading the charge, the Big 12 is poised to challenge the dominance of other conferences. Dive into the dynamics of Utah's passionate fan base and its pivotal role in the Big 12, drawing parallels to Texas's historical influence. The episode also explores the polarizing impact of Deion Sanders and Colorado, where "hate-watching" has become a phenomenon. Featuring insights from Drake Toll and other experts, this discussion promises a fresh perspective on the evolving college football scene.Tune in for an engaging analysis that uncovers the hidden narratives shaping the Big 12's future. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

While Colorado officially rejoined the Big 12 Conference in the fall of 2024, after a 13-year stint in the Pac-12, there are indeed some recent rumblings and speculative discussions suggesting that the Buffaloes might already be eyeing another potential conference move – this time to the Southeastern Conference (SEC).Here's a breakdown of the situation and the factors fueling these rumors:Sources of the Rumors:Message Board Chatter: As with many realignment discussions, a significant portion of this speculation originates from college football message boards and social media. Fans often engage in hypotheticals and share unverified information.Perceived Instability (Despite Big 12 Return): Even though Colorado's return to the Big 12 was seen as a move for stability after the collapse of the Pac-12, some still question the long-term viability and earning potential of the Big 12 compared to the SEC.Deion Sanders Factor: Coach Deion Sanders' high profile and national appeal could make Colorado an attractive addition to any conference looking to boost its visibility and ratings. There's a belief that Sanders' influence could sway conference decisions."Power Two" Focus: With the growing perception of the SEC and Big Ten as the dominant "Power Two" conferences, there's speculation that other ambitious programs might seek entry into these leagues for long-term security and financial benefits.Arguments for Colorado to the SEC (Hypothetical):Increased Revenue: The SEC's media rights deals are the most lucrative in college football. Joining the SEC would significantly increase Colorado's revenue.National Exposure: The SEC boasts the highest national viewership and media attention, which could further elevate the Colorado program and its recruiting efforts under Sanders.Elite Competition: While the Big 12 is competitive, the SEC is widely regarded as the toughest conference in the nation. Competing against the best could be appealing to Colorado's ambitions.Geographic Considerations (Less Strong): While not a natural geographic fit, the SEC has expanded its footprint in the past, and the allure of the conference's strength might outweigh regional concerns.Counterarguments and Realities:Recent Big 12 Return: Colorado just rejoined the Big 12 and likely made that decision with a degree of long-term commitment in mind, especially considering the financial incentives to leave the Pac-12.Big 12 Stability: The Big 12, under Commissioner Brett Yormark, has been proactive in its expansion and is working to secure its financial future. Recent contract extensions for Yormark suggest confidence in the conference's direction.SEC Expansion Needs: The SEC has already added Texas and Oklahoma and may not be actively looking to expand further at this time, especially with potential future CFP formats guaranteeing multiple spots for top conferences.Geographic Challenges: Colorado's location presents travel challenges for many SEC members.Conclusion:While the idea of Colorado potentially pushing to join the SEC might be circulating in message board discussions and among some fans, there is no concrete or widely reported evidence to suggest that this is an imminent or actively pursued move by the University of Colorado or the SEC. Colorado has just returned to the Big 12, a move intended to provide stability. Any further realignment so soon would be a significant development and would likely require substantial motivation and negotiation, none of which has been publicly indicated. As always, information from message boards should be treated with caution and considered speculative until verified by credible sources.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Amazon Fire TV Stick 4kDid you know your Fire TV is also an Xbox? Turn any TV into your gaming and entertainment hub with Fire TV Stick 4K devices — no console required. Head to Amazon.com/firetvlockedon to get started. Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscription and compatible controller required.Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year.WayFairAfter the holiday hustle, there’s nothing like giving your home a little TLC. Give your home the refresh it needs with Wayfair. Head to Wayfair.com right now. Wayfair. Every style. Every home.GametimeDownload the Gametime app, create an account, and use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE for $20 off your first purchase. Terms apply. Download Gametime today. What time is it? Gametime.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL,

Cody Campbell actively working to bring Texas and Oklahoma back to the Big 12, his background and current position certainly place him in a sphere of influence where such a desire wouldn't be entirely surprising. Here's a breakdown of why this idea might hold some weight:Cody Campbell's Connections and Perspective:Former Texas Tech Player: Campbell was a successful quarterback at Texas Tech, a long-standing member of the Big 12. This deep-rooted history with the conference likely fostered strong ties and an understanding of the Big 12's unique dynamics and rivalries.Texas Roots: As a Texan who played for a Texas university within the Big 12, Campbell likely appreciates the cultural and athletic significance of the conference within the state. The departure of Texas and Oklahoma undoubtedly altered the landscape of college sports in Texas.Regent of Texas Tech University System: In his current role as a Regent, Campbell has a fiduciary responsibility to act in the best interests of Texas Tech. The health and competitiveness of the Big 12 directly impact Texas Tech's athletic and financial well-being. A weakened Big 12 without its traditional powerhouses could be seen as detrimental.Understanding Big 12 Dynamics: Having been a player in the conference, Campbell likely understands the rivalries and the overall ecosystem that made the Big 12 unique. The loss of Texas and Oklahoma disrupted many of these established relationships.Why a Return Might Be Desirable (From a Big 12/Texas Tech Perspective):Enhanced Competitiveness: The return of Texas and Oklahoma would undoubtedly elevate the Big 12's national profile and competitiveness, making it a more attractive conference for fans, recruits, and media partners.Renewed Rivalries: The reinstatement of traditional rivalries involving Texas, Oklahoma, and Texas Tech (among others) would generate significant interest and revenue.Regional Stability: Having Texas and Oklahoma back in the fold would solidify the Big 12's position as a major power conference in the central United States.Financial Implications: A stronger Big 12 with its traditional blue-bloods could potentially command more lucrative media rights deals, benefiting all member institutions, including Texas Tech.Potential Motivations for Campbell (Speculative):Legacy and Nostalgia: As a former Big 12 player, Campbell might have a personal desire to see the conference restored to its former glory with the return of its cornerstone programs.Best Interest of Texas Tech: He might believe that a stronger Big 12, with Texas and Oklahoma, ultimately benefits Texas Tech's athletic ambitions and financial stability more than the current configuration.Influence and Leadership: As a Regent, Campbell has a platform to voice his opinions and potentially influence discussions surrounding conference realignment.However, it's crucial to acknowledge the significant hurdles:Texas and Oklahoma's SEC Commitment: Both universities are now members of the SEC and have likely established new financial and competitive priorities within that conference. Leaving the SEC would likely involve significant financial penalties and a major shift in their strategic direction.SEC Benefits: Texas and Oklahoma are likely benefiting from the SEC's lucrative media rights deals and the perceived strength of the conference.Power Dynamics: The SEC's current strength might make a return to a potentially less dominant Big 12 less appealing to Texas and Oklahoma.In conclusion, while there's no concrete evidence of Cody Campbell actively spearheading an effort to bring Texas and Oklahoma back to the Big 12, his background as a former Texas Tech player and his current influential position as a Regent make it plausible that he might harbor a desire for such a reunion, believing it would ultimately benefit Texas Tech and the Big 12 Conference as a whole. However, the significant commitments of Texas and Oklahoma to the SEC present substantial obstacles to this hypothetical scenario.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Amazon Fire TV Stick 4kDid you know your Fire TV is also an Xbox? Turn any TV into your gaming and entertainment hub with Fire TV Stick 4K devices — no console required. Head to Amazon.com/firetvlockedon to get started. Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscription and compatible controller required.Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year.WayFairAfter the holiday hustle, there’s nothing like giving your home a little TLC. Give your home the refresh it needs with Wayfair. Head to Wayfair.com right now. Wayfair. Every style. Every home.GametimeDownload the Gametime app, create an account, and use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE for $20 off your first purchase. Terms apply. Download Gametime today. What time is it? Gametime.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.C

Brian Santiago's appointment as the athletic director at BYU isn't just a routine administrative move; it's a strategic decision rooted in his profound understanding of the institution, his demonstrated leadership acumen, and his deep-seated commitment to the holistic development of student-athletes within the unique framework of BYU's mission. His nearly three-decade-long association with BYU athletics provides him with an unparalleled institutional memory and a nuanced perspective on the program's strengths, challenges, and future potential.His journey from a men's basketball coach in 1997 to the Deputy Athletic Director since 2017 speaks volumes about his dedication and the trust placed in him over the years. This extended period of service has allowed him to witness firsthand the evolution of BYU athletics, understand its distinct culture, and build invaluable relationships across various departments and with key stakeholders. Unlike an external hire who would require a significant period of acclimation, Santiago steps into the role with an immediate and comprehensive grasp of the landscape.Furthermore, his tenure as Deputy Athletic Director wasn't merely a supporting role. By all accounts, he was a pivotal figure in the athletic department's operations, actively involved in crucial decision-making processes. President Reese's acknowledgment of his leadership in navigating the complexities of NIL (Name, Image, Likeness) and the ever-shifting landscape of conference realignments underscores his strategic thinking and adaptability – qualities that are paramount in today's dynamic collegiate athletic environment. His experience in these critical areas means BYU won't face a learning curve in addressing these contemporary challenges.Santiago's deep ties to the BYU community extend beyond his professional roles. As an alumnus of the Marriott School of Management, he embodies the university's academic values and possesses a personal connection to its broader mission. His established relationships with influential alumni like Ryan Smith and Danny Ainge are significant assets. These connections can be leveraged for fundraising initiatives, enhancing facilities, and fostering a stronger sense of community support for BYU athletics. His ability to bridge the gap between the athletic department and prominent alumni could prove instrumental in securing the resources necessary for sustained success.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Amazon Fire TV Stick 4kDid you know your Fire TV is also an Xbox? Turn any TV into your gaming and entertainment hub with Fire TV Stick 4K devices — no console required. Head to Amazon.com/firetvlockedon to get started. Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscription and compatible controller required.Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year.WayFairAfter the holiday hustle, there’s nothing like giving your home a little TLC. Give your home the refresh it needs with Wayfair. Head to Wayfair.com right now. Wayfair. Every style. Every home.GametimeDownload the Gametime app, create an account, and use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE for $20 off your first purchase. Terms apply. Download Gametime today. What time is it? Gametime.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

You're right, there's a growing movement and significant discussion around potentially expanding the College Football Playoff (CFP) to 16 teams, with a specific emphasis on automatic bids (AQ) for the power conferences, particularly the SEC and Big Ten.Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of this movement:The Push for Expansion:Dissatisfaction with 12-Team Format: While the 12-team format is new for the 2024 season, there's already a sense among some power brokers, particularly in the SEC and Big Ten, that it may not be the optimal long-term solution. Desire for More Representation: The SEC and Big Ten, boasting the most highly-ranked teams and perceived strength in depth, are reportedly pushing for a format that guarantees more spots for their conferences. Financial Incentives: A larger playoff field would likely generate even more revenue from television deals, further benefiting the participating conferences and institutions.The Proposed 16-Team Format:Multiple Automatic Bids: The central tenet of this movement is to allocate multiple automatic bids to the power conferences based on their perceived strength and number of quality teams. Four Autobids for SEC and Big Ten: The most frequently discussed model involves granting four automatic bids each to the SEC and the Big Ten. This would essentially guarantee a significant representation from these two conferences in the 16-team field. Two Autobids for ACC and Big 12: The ACC and Big 12 are often mentioned as receiving two automatic bids each under this model. One Autobid for Group of Five: A single automatic bid is typically proposed for the highest-ranked champion from the Group of Five conferences (Mountain West, American, Sun Belt, Conference USA, MAC).Remaining At-Large Bids: The remaining three spots in the 16-team field would be filled by at-large selections, presumably based on the CFP selection committee's rankings of the best remaining teams. Some discussions even suggest one of these at-large bids could be specifically for Notre Dame if they meet certain ranking criteria.Rationale Behind the Four Autobids for SEC and Big Ten:Perceived Dominance: Proponents argue that the SEC and Big Ten consistently field the largest number of elite teams and deserve greater representation to ensure the "best" teams are in the playoff. Maximizing Revenue: Guaranteeing more participation from the top brands in these conferences would likely drive higher television ratings and thus greater revenue.Regular Season Importance: The idea of "inner-league play-in games" at the end of the season has been floated, where teams within the conference would compete for these automatic bids, potentially increasing the significance of late-season matchups beyond just the conference championship game. For example, the 3rd vs 6th and 4th vs 5th ranked teams in the conference could play for an AQ spot. Potential Implications and Concerns:Devaluation of Regular Season: Critics argue that guaranteeing so many spots to specific conferences could diminish the importance of regular-season games, as teams with multiple losses could still make the playoff due to the automatic bid structure.Reduced Role of Selection Committee: With 11 automatic bids in a 16-team field, the selection committee's influence in choosing the participants would be significantly reduced. Their primary role would shift to seeding the teams.Fairness to Other Conferences: The ACC, Big 12, and Group of Five could argue that this format disproportionately favors the SEC and Big Ten and doesn't provide equitable access to the playoff for other deserving teams.Potential for Less Intriguing Matchups: If a significant portion of the field is filled by teams from the same two conferences, it could lead to less geographic diversity and potentially more rematches in the playoff.Current Status and Future Outlook:Growing Support: Reports indicate that the 16-team model with these AQ allocations is indeed gaining traction and support among decision-makers in the SEC and Big Ten.Power Four Meetings: Commissioners from the Power Four conferences have been meeting to discuss future playoff formats. Decision Expected Soon: A decision on whether the CFP will expand further and adopt a new format is anticipated in the next month or two, potentially with implementation as early as the 2026 season (when the current agreement with ESPN ends and a new one begins).SEC and Big Ten Leverage: Due to their financial power and the terms of the new CFP contract, the SEC and Big Ten hold significant influence over the future format. In conclusion, there is a clear and growing movement, driven largely by the SEC and Big Ten, towards expanding the College Football Playoff to 16 teams with a format that includes four automatic bids for each of those conferences, along with fewer at-large selections. While proponents argue it ensures the best teams participate and maximizes revenue, critics raise concerns about the devaluation of the regular seaso

Recent rumors circulating are regarding the potential future conference affiliations of Kansas and Colorado, specifically mentioning a move to the Southeastern Conference (SEC).Regarding Kansas:Rumors about Kansas potentially joining the SEC have surfaced on message boards, particularly around the idea of the SEC expanding to 20 teams.Some discussions suggest that the increasing value of basketball could make Kansas, a historically strong basketball program, an attractive target for the SEC.However, these remain largely speculative discussions among fans. Some analysts and fans question the fit, noting that Kansas doesn't necessarily add a significant new television market to the SEC footprint, unlike potential additions in the ACC.There was a report in May 2024 about Kansas being a potential SEC target if the conference expanded further, but this was based on message board chatter and speculation.Regarding Colorado:While Colorado officially rejoined the Big 12 in the fall of 2024 after leaving the Pac-12, there have been some discussions and hypotheticals about their long-term conference future.Some message board conversations have included Colorado as a potential SEC target in very hypothetical scenarios, particularly if there were significant further realignment.However, much of the recent news surrounding Colorado's conference moves has focused on their return to the Big 12 and the financial incentives involved in that decision.There was a brief mention in April 2025 of Colorado being a potential transfer destination for a quarterback, with the SEC being off-limits due to conference rules, implying their current non-SEC status.General Considerations about Message Board Rumors:It's important to treat information found on message boards as largely speculative and unverified. These forums often contain fan theories, wishful thinking, and conjecture rather than confirmed sources.Conference realignment is a complex process involving numerous factors, including media rights, geography, athletic performance, and institutional relationships. Actual decisions are typically made by university and conference leadership, often behind closed doors.While message board discussions can sometimes reflect underlying sentiments or potential scenarios, they should not be taken as factual reporting.In summary, while the idea of Kansas and Colorado joining the SEC might be a topic of discussion among fans on message boards, there is no concrete or widely reported evidence to suggest that these moves are imminent or actively being pursued by the universities or the SEC at this time. Both schools are currently members of the Big 12 (Colorado having just rejoined), and any future realignment decisions would likely involve significant strategic considerations beyond message board speculation.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Amazon Fire TV Stick 4kDid you know your Fire TV is also an Xbox? Turn any TV into your gaming and entertainment hub with Fire TV Stick 4K devices — no console required. Head to Amazon.com/firetvlockedon to get started. Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscription and compatible controller required.Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year.WayFairAfter the holiday hustle, there’s nothing like giving your home a little TLC. Give your home the refresh it needs with Wayfair. Head to Wayfair.com right now. Wayfair. Every style. Every home.GametimeDownload the Gametime app, create an account, and use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE for $20 off your first purchase. Terms apply. Download Gametime today. What time is it? Gametime.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Is the ACC's potential division restructuring a game-changer or a misstep? As the Big 12 Squad dives into the latest college football buzz, they explore the implications of North Carolina's rumored Big Ten move and the ripple effects on the college sports landscape. With insights from Drake, Cameron, and other panelists, the discussion covers player transfers, tampering allegations, and the impact of NIL deals on athlete loyalty. The conversation also touches on the role of agents in shaping college athletics, with Paul sharing firsthand experiences. Join the debate and discover how these developments could reshape the future of college football. Listen now for exclusive insights and expert analysis. Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Supply HouseJoin the Trade Master program today at SupplyHouse.com/TM and start ordering plumbing, HVAC, and electrical supplies with just a few clicks. Plus, use promo code SH5 for 5% off your first order. That’s SupplyHouse.com! Amazon Fire TV Stick 4kDid you know your Fire TV is also an Xbox? Turn any TV into your gaming and entertainment hub with Fire TV Stick 4K devices — no console required. Head to Amazon.com/firetvlockedon to get started. Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscription and compatible controller required.Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year. UpworkVisit Upwork.comright now and post your job for free. With Upwork, you can find specialized freelancers in marketing, development, design, and more—experts ready to help you take your business to the next level.GametimeDownload the Gametime app, create an account, and use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE for $20 off your first purchase. Terms apply. Download Gametime today. What time is it? Gametime.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

You're spot on. The potential fit of UNLV into the Big 12 Conference looks increasingly promising, offering benefits for both the university and the league. Here's a breakdown of why it makes good sense:Tapping into a Unique and Growing Market:Las Vegas Media Exposure: Adding UNLV would give the Big 12 a significant foothold in the vibrant and expanding Las Vegas media market. This untapped territory could lead to increased viewership, advertising opportunities, and overall brand visibility for the conference. "Sports Capital" Synergy: Las Vegas has firmly established itself as a global hub for major sporting events. UNLV's presence in the Big 12 could create exciting collaborations and opportunities to showcase the conference within this dynamic environment, attracting national attention. Tourism and Fan Engagement: UNLV's location in a major tourist destination presents unique possibilities for fan engagement and potential neutral-site conference events, drawing visitors and boosting the Big 12's profile.Elevating Athletic Programs in a Power Conference:Ascending Football Program: UNLV's football team has demonstrated significant progress recently, highlighted by their 2024 Mountain West Championship appearance. Their access to the state-of-the-art Allegiant Stadium and the Fertitta Football Complex signals a commitment to competing at a high level, making them a more compelling Power Four addition.Basketball Potential and History: While aiming for consistent national prominence, UNLV's rich basketball history and passionate fanbase provide a strong foundation. The resources and competition within the Big 12 could be the catalyst to elevate their program back to national relevance.Comprehensive Athletic Offerings: UNLV sponsors a wide array of athletic programs that are competitive within the Mountain West, adding depth and breadth to the Big 12's overall athletic portfolio.Strategic Geographic Alignment:Western Expansion and Regional Matchups: UNLV's location in Southern Nevada strategically aligns with the Big 12's growing western footprint, creating natural regional rivalries with Arizona, Utah, and potentially other future additions. This can help manage travel costs and enhance fan interest.National Reach: Adding a program in the Mountain West region further broadens the Big 12's national presence and appeal to recruits across the country.Institutional Strengths:Research Focus: UNLV's Carnegie R1 classification as a doctoral university with very high research activity aligns with the academic standards of many Big 12 institutions. Growing Enrollment and Fanbase: As a large and expanding public university with a diverse student body, UNLV offers a growing and engaged fanbase for Big 12 athletics.Leadership Connections and Momentum:Familiar Athletic Director: UNLV Athletic Director Erick Harper's deep ties to the Big 12 through his time at Kansas State could facilitate a smoother transition and integration into the conference. Increasing Buzz: The growing speculation and "whispers" surrounding UNLV as a potential Power Four target, specifically within the Big 12, indicate a mutual interest and a recognition of the potential benefits on both sides.In conclusion, the addition of UNLV to the Big 12 appears to be a mutually beneficial proposition. UNLV gains the prestige, resources, and enhanced competition of a Power Four conference, while the Big 12 gains access to a dynamic and growing market in Las Vegas, bolsters its western presence, and adds improving athletic programs with significant potential. It's a fit that seems to align well with the strategic goals of both the university and the evolving Big 12 Conference.Sources and related content Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Supply HouseJoin the Trade Master program today at SupplyHouse.com/TM and start ordering plumbing, HVAC, and electrical supplies with just a few clicks. Plus, use promo code SH5 for 5% off your first order. That’s SupplyHouse.com! Amazon Fire TV Stick 4kDid you know your Fire TV is also an Xbox? Turn any TV into your gaming and entertainment hub with Fire TV Stick 4K devices — no console required. Head to Amazon.com/firetvlockedon to get started. Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscription and compatible controller required.Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year. UpworkVisit Upwork.comright now and post your job for free. With Upwork, you can find specialized freelancers in marketing, development, design, and more—experts ready to help you take your business to the next level.GametimeDownload the Gametime app, create an account, and use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE for $20 off your first purchase. Terms apply. Download Gametime today. What time is it? Gametime.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Off

While there haven't been officially confirmed investigations or widespread reports of BYU tampering with other specific Big 12 schools' players in the transfer portal, the topic has certainly generated discussion and some accusations, primarily from rival fanbases. Here's a breakdown of the situation and the context:Key Themes in the Rumors and Discussions:Utah Rivalry: The most prominent rumors and accusations of tampering involve the University of Utah. Given the intense "Holy War" rivalry between BYU and Utah, any player movement from Utah to BYU (or vice versa) often sparks immediate speculation among fans. Some Utah fans have voiced concerns online about potential improper contact or inducements from BYU before players officially enter the portal.NIL as a Factor: The advent of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) opportunities has added a new layer to the transfer portal landscape. There are concerns across college sports that schools or their boosters might be using NIL deals to entice players to transfer, potentially constituting tampering if contact occurs before the player is in the portal. BYU, with a dedicated and potentially well-funded alumni base, has been mentioned in these broader discussions, though not always with specific evidence of tampering.Baylor Allegations: There was a notable instance in April 2025 where a personality associated with Baylor's Locked On podcast accused BYU of tampering in relation to a Baylor transfer. This highlights how the competitive nature of recruiting within the Big 12 can lead to such accusations. General Suspicions: As BYU enters the Big 12 with increased resources and a national profile, some fans of other Big 12 schools might be moreQuick to suspect tampering when players choose to transfer to Provo, even without concrete evidence. This can be fueled by the perception that BYU now has the means (including NIL) to be a more aggressive recruiter.Important Considerations:Lack of Concrete Evidence: It's crucial to emphasize that the vast majority of these discussions are based on speculation, fan theories, and anecdotal observations rather than confirmed investigations or official reports of wrongdoing by BYU.Difficulty in Proving Tampering: Tampering is notoriously difficult to prove. A player's decision to transfer can be influenced by numerous legitimate factors, and demonstrating improper pre-portal contact is challenging.BYU's Compliance: BYU, as an institution with a strong emphasis on rules and conduct, would face significant repercussions if found to have engaged in widespread tampering.Past NCAA Issues for BYU Athletics:It's worth noting that BYU's athletic programs have faced NCAA scrutiny in the past, though these instances don't directly relate to current tampering allegations within the Big 12:BYU Basketball (2018-2019): The BYU men's basketball program was penalized by the NCAA for providing improper benefits (including travel, entertainment, and cash) to a former player by boosters. This resulted in vacated wins, probation, a fine, and recruiting restrictions. In summary, while rumors and accusations of BYU tampering with other Big 12 schools' players exist, particularly concerning Utah, there is no widespread evidence of systematic violations or ongoing NCAA investigations into the matter as of today, May 6, 2025. The discussions are often fueled by rivalries, the new landscape of NIL and the transfer portal, and general speculation. It's important to distinguish between fan conjecture and confirmed wrongdoing. Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Supply HouseJoin the Trade Master program today at SupplyHouse.com/TM and start ordering plumbing, HVAC, and electrical supplies with just a few clicks. Plus, use promo code SH5 for 5% off your first order. That’s SupplyHouse.com! Amazon Fire TV Stick 4kDid you know your Fire TV is also an Xbox? Turn any TV into your gaming and entertainment hub with Fire TV Stick 4K devices — no console required. Head to Amazon.com/firetvlockedon to get started. Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscription and compatible controller required.Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year. UpworkVisit Upwork.comright now and post your job for free. With Upwork, you can find specialized freelancers in marketing, development, design, and more—experts ready to help you take your business to the next level.GametimeDownload the Gametime app, create an account, and use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE for $20 off your first purchase. Terms apply. Download Gametime today. What time is it? Gametime.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions

North Carolina and Notre Dame represent arguably the two most coveted potential expansion targets for the Big Ten Conference. Their appeal stems from a confluence of factors that align with the conference's strategic goals.North Carolina: A Prime Target Academic Excellence and AAU Membership: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill boasts a strong academic reputation and holds membership in the Association of American Universities (AAU), a key criterion for the Big Ten. Strong Athletic Brand: UNC possesses a nationally recognized brand, particularly in basketball, but also with a solid football program and success in other Olympic sports. This broad athletic appeal adds significant value.Large Media Market: North Carolina represents a significant and growing media market, particularly the Raleigh and Charlotte areas. This would expand the Big Ten's reach into a new and valuable region.Southern Foothold: Adding UNC would give the Big Ten a crucial foothold in the South, a region rich in athletic talent and a strategic area for national expansion and recruiting.Recruiting Hotbed: North Carolina is a fertile recruiting ground for various sports, and the Big Ten's presence there could enhance recruiting opportunities for all member institutions.Historical Significance (ACC Ties): While currently a cornerstone of the ACC, UNC's potential departure would significantly weaken the ACC and further solidify the Big Ten's position as a dominant power conference.Notre Dame: The Ultimate PrizeElite National Brand: The University of Notre Dame holds an unparalleled national brand in college football, with a massive and dedicated fanbase across the country. Their inclusion would instantly elevate the profile and prestige of any conference. Media Rights Goldmine: Notre Dame's football games command significant television ratings. Adding them would substantially increase the value of the Big Ten's media rights deals. Academic Respectability: While not an AAU member (a historical point of contention), Notre Dame possesses a strong academic reputation that generally aligns with the Big Ten's standards.Strategic Geographic Location: While Indiana already has Big Ten members (Indiana and Purdue), Notre Dame's location adds a unique national draw and doesn't necessarily create in-state competition concerns in the same way adding another Big Ten school in Indiana might.Historic Independence: Notre Dame's long-standing independence in football makes them a unique and highly sought-after commodity in conference realignment. Landing them would be a monumental coup for any conference.Why the Big Ten Desires Them:Revenue Generation: Both North Carolina and Notre Dame would bring significant revenue through media rights, ticket sales, and merchandise.Competitive Balance: Adding strong athletic programs enhances the overall competitiveness and national relevance of the Big Ten.National Footprint: Expanding into new geographic regions increases the conference's national presence and appeal to recruits and fans.Long-Term Stability: Securing these blue-chip programs would contribute significantly to the Big Ten's long-term stability and position in the evolving college sports landscape.Challenges and Considerations:Notre Dame's Independence: Notre Dame has fiercely guarded its football independence for decades, and convincing them to join a conference would be a significant hurdle. Financial incentives and the changing landscape of college football (like the expanded College Football Playoff) might eventually sway them.ACC Grant of Rights: North Carolina, along with other ACC members, is bound by a long-term Grant of Rights agreement that makes leaving the conference financially prohibitive without a significant legal challenge or settlement. Potential Counter-Offers: The SEC would also be highly interested in adding North Carolina and potentially Notre Dame, leading to a potential bidding war if either becomes available.In conclusion, North Carolina and Notre Dame represent the "white whales" of Big Ten expansion. Their strong brands, academic standing (in UNC's case, AAU membership), media market appeal, and athletic prowess make them exceptionally attractive targets as the conference looks to solidify its position as one of the two dominant powers in college athletics. While significant obstacles exist, the potential benefits of adding either (or both) institutions would be transformative for the Big Ten.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Supply HouseJoin the Trade Master program today at SupplyHouse.com/TM and start ordering plumbing, HVAC, and electrical supplies with just a few clicks. Plus, use promo code SH5 for 5% off your first order. That’s SupplyHouse.com! Amazon Fire TV Stick 4kDid you know your Fire TV is also an Xbox? Turn any TV into your gaming and entertainment hub with Fire TV Stick 4K devices — no console required. Head to Amazon.com/firetvlockedon to get started. Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscription and comp

A potential return of Nebraska to the Big 12 Conference could offer significant advantages for both the university and the conference itself. Here's a breakdown of how such a move could be mutually beneficial:For Nebraska:Renewed Rivalries: Returning to the Big 12 would reignite classic rivalries with teams like Oklahoma, Kansas, Kansas State, and potentially Missouri and Iowa State depending on conference alignment. These matchups boast historical significance and passionate fan bases, which could boost game attendance and media interest.Improved Recruiting in Key Areas: The Big 12 footprint has a strong presence in Texas, a crucial recruiting ground for many football programs. Nebraska's return could improve their access and visibility to talented high school players in the region, potentially bolstering their roster with more speed and athleticism, areas where they have struggled compared to Big Ten competition.Easier Path to Conference Success: While the Big 12 is a competitive conference, the top-to-bottom strength might be perceived as less daunting than the Big Ten, particularly its Eastern division. A return could provide Nebraska with a more realistic path to competing for conference championships, which could revitalize the program and fan enthusiasm.Increased National Relevance: Success in a Power Five conference like the Big 12 would elevate Nebraska's national profile. Playing in high-stakes games against familiar foes would generate media attention and potentially improve their College Football Playoff positioning if they perform well.Cultural Fit: Nebraska has a rich history within the Big 12's predecessor, the Big Eight. A return could resonate with the program's traditions and connect with a fan base that remembers those eras fondly. For the Big 12:Adding a Blue-Blood Program: Nebraska is a program with a storied history, national championships, and a large, passionate fan base. Their addition would instantly elevate the Big 12's prestige and national recognition, helping to fill the void left by the departures of Texas and Oklahoma. Enhanced Media Value: Nebraska's strong following would bring significant viewership and market appeal to the Big 12's media rights. Their games, especially against traditional rivals, would be highly attractive to television networks, potentially increasing the conference's overall media revenue.Strengthened Conference Stability: Adding a program with Nebraska's stature would further solidify the Big 12's position as a major player in college athletics, providing long-term stability and attractiveness to other potential expansion candidates in the future.Geographic Expansion and Market Reach: While not a new market, Nebraska expands the Big 12's geographic footprint into the Plains states, potentially attracting fans and recruits from that region.Intriguing New Matchups and Storylines: The return of Nebraska would create a wealth of compelling new matchups and storylines within the Big 12, generating excitement and interest among fans across the conference. The rekindling of old rivalries would be a major selling point.However, it's important to acknowledge potential hurdles:Financial Implications: Nebraska would need to weigh the financial aspects of switching conferences, considering potential differences in media rights deals and other revenue streams between the Big Ten and the Big 12.Big Ten Relationships: Nebraska has established relationships within the Big Ten over the past decade. Leaving could impact those connections and future non-conference scheduling.On-Field Performance: Nebraska would need to improve its on-field performance to capitalize on the benefits of a potential return to the Big 12. Simply changing conferences won't guarantee success.In conclusion, a move back to the Big 12 could be a win-win scenario for both Nebraska and the conference. Nebraska would gain renewed rivalries, potentially an easier path to success, and improved recruiting opportunities, while the Big 12 would add a prestigious program with a large fan base and enhance its overall value and stability. The decision would ultimately come down to a careful evaluation of the strategic, financial, and athletic implications for both parties.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Supply HouseJoin the Trade Master program today at SupplyHouse.com/TM and start ordering plumbing, HVAC, and electrical supplies with just a few clicks. Plus, use promo code SH5 for 5% off your first order. That’s SupplyHouse.com! Amazon Fire TV Stick 4kDid you know your Fire TV is also an Xbox? Turn any TV into your gaming and entertainment hub with Fire TV Stick 4K devices — no console required. Head to Amazon.com/firetvlockedon to get started. Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscription and compatible controller required.Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year. UpworkVisit Upwork.comright now and post your job fo

While there haven't been any officially confirmed accusations or investigations involving Utah or Oklahoma State directly accusing BYU of tampering in the football transfer portal, the intense rivalry between Utah and BYU, coupled with the nature of the transfer portal, often leads to speculation and concerns among fans.Here's a breakdown of the situation and the context surrounding it:Understanding Tampering:In the context of the NCAA transfer portal, "tampering" refers to a school or its representatives (including coaches and boosters) contacting a student-athlete who is currently enrolled at another four-year institution before that athlete has officially entered the transfer portal.NCAA rules strictly prohibit such contact to maintain the integrity of the recruiting process and prevent schools from unduly influencing players who are still under contract with their current institution.The Utah-BYU Context:The rivalry between the University of Utah and BYU is one of the most passionate in college sports. Any player movement between the two schools is highly scrutinized and can fuel suspicion among fans.When Utah players transfer to BYU, or vice versa, it often leads to allegations of tampering, even if there is no concrete evidence. Fans may speculate that improper contact or inducements occurred before the player officially entered the portal. The introduction of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) opportunities has further complicated the landscape. There are concerns that boosters could be using NIL deals to entice players to transfer, potentially before they are in the portal, which would also constitute tampering.Oklahoma State and the Broader Issue:While specific accusations from Oklahoma State regarding BYU haven't surfaced in the available information, concerns about tampering within the transfer portal are widespread across college football.Coaches at various programs, including potentially Oklahoma State, have voiced frustrations about the challenges of roster management in the transfer portal era and the potential for unethical recruiting practices.The open nature of the transfer portal, while providing flexibility for student-athletes, also creates opportunities for indirect contact and conversations that could be perceived as tampering.Difficulty in Proving Tampering:Tampering is notoriously difficult to prove. Direct evidence of improper contact before a player enters the portal is often lacking.A player's decision to transfer can be influenced by numerous legitimate factors, such as playing time, coaching changes, academic opportunities, and personal preferences. Disentangling these factors from potential tampering is challenging.NCAA Rules and Penalties:NCAA rules mandate that a student-athlete must notify their current school of their intent to transfer, and the school then has a limited time to enter the athlete's name into the transfer portal. Only after this occurs can other schools legally contact the athlete. If a school is found guilty of tampering, potential penalties can include recruiting restrictions, fines, and suspensions for coaches.In Summary:While direct accusations from Utah or Oklahoma State specifically naming BYU for transfer portal tampering haven't been widely reported, the intense rivalry between Utah and BYU creates an environment where such allegations are easily made by fans when players transfer between the schools. More broadly, concerns about tampering are prevalent in college football due to the nature of the transfer portal and the introduction of NIL. Proving such allegations, however, remains a significant challenge for the NCAA. Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Supply HouseJoin the Trade Master program today at SupplyHouse.com/TM and start ordering plumbing, HVAC, and electrical supplies with just a few clicks. Plus, use promo code SH5 for 5% off your first order. That’s SupplyHouse.com! Amazon Fire TV Stick 4kDid you know your Fire TV is also an Xbox? Turn any TV into your gaming and entertainment hub with Fire TV Stick 4K devices — no console required. Head to Amazon.com/firetvlockedon to get started. Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscription and compatible controller required.Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year. UpworkVisit Upwork.comright now and post your job for free. With Upwork, you can find specialized freelancers in marketing, development, design, and more—experts ready to help you take your business to the next level.GametimeDownload the Gametime app, create an account, and use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE for $20 off your first purchase. Terms apply. Download Gametime today. What time is it? Gametime.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First o

There may be evidence to suggest that BYU, as a "media empire," has scorned the Big 12, it's interesting to consider the media landscape surrounding the conference and BYU's role within it. BYU does have its own robust media ecosystem. BYU Broadcasting operates several television and radio channels, including BYUtv, which broadcasts a variety of content, including BYU sports. The university also has a strong digital presence through its websites and social media channels. This allows BYU a significant degree of control over its messaging and the distribution of its content. When BYU joined the Big 12 in the 2023-24 academic year, it brought with it a dedicated fanbase and its existing media capabilities. This could be seen as an asset to the conference, potentially expanding the reach of Big 12 content to BYU's national audience. The Big 12 Conference itself has a significant media rights deal with ESPN and Fox, which runs through the 2030-31 season. This long-term contract provides substantial revenue for the conference and its member institutions. The value of these media rights is crucial for the financial stability and competitiveness of the conference. Some discussions around the Big 12 have involved the potential for further expansion and the negotiation of future media rights deals. In this context, the media presence of a school like BYU could be a factor in the overall value and appeal of the conference to media partners. It's important to note that the relationship between a conference and its member institutions regarding media is complex and involves mutual benefit. While BYU has its own media operations, its participation in the Big 12 provides access to a larger platform and broader exposure through the conference's media partners. Similarly, BYU's fanbase and media reach can contribute to the overall value of the Big 12's media rights. Therefore, rather than "scorning" the Big 12, BYU's established media presence is more likely to be a factor that the conference considers as they navigate the evolving landscape of college sports media Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Supply HouseJoin the Trade Master program today at SupplyHouse.com/TM and start ordering plumbing, HVAC, and electrical supplies with just a few clicks. Plus, use promo code SH5 for 5% off your first order. That’s SupplyHouse.com! Amazon Fire TV Stick 4kDid you know your Fire TV is also an Xbox? Turn any TV into your gaming and entertainment hub with Fire TV Stick 4K devices — no console required. Head to Amazon.com/firetvlockedon to get started. Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscription and compatible controller required.Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year. GametimeDownload the Gametime app, create an account, and use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE for $20 off your first purchase. Terms apply. Download Gametime today. What time is it? Gametime.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Shedeur Sanders' unexpected fall to the fifth round of the NFL draft has left many questioning the evaluators' decisions. Could the Colorado quarterback's high-profile background and interview performance have influenced his draft position? This episode unpacks the factors behind Sanders' draft journey, featuring insights from Drake Toll, Cody Stovall, JT West, Nick Maravetz, and Parker Greensworth. The discussion also explores the potential expansion of the Big 12 conference, with Sacramento State as a surprising contender. With $50 million in NIL raised and Shaquille O'Neal as the basketball GM, could Sacramento State be the next big addition?Tune in for an engaging analysis of Shedeur Sanders' NFL prospects and the Big 12's expansion possibilities. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

While it's exciting to consider potential shifts in power within the Big 12, declaring Arizona State the definitive "new king" for the 2025 football season over established programs and those with their own upward trajectories is premature. However, there are certainly compelling reasons why the Sun Devils could be poised for a significant leap and potentially challenge for the top spot.Here's a breakdown of why the buzz around Arizona State's potential "kingship" in the Big 12 is growing, especially when compared to the other programs mentioned:Arguments for Arizona State Potentially Surpassing the Others:Reigning Big 12 Champions: Arizona State, under the guidance of Coach Kenny Dillingham, surprised many by winning the Big 12 Championship in the 2024 season. This immediate success provides a strong foundation and belief within the program.Returning Key Talent: Despite losing star running back Cameron Skattebo to the NFL, the Sun Devils are expected to return a significant portion of their key players, including:Quarterback Sam Leavitt: He had a strong 2024 season and is already generating some early Heisman Trophy buzz.Wide Receiver Jordyn Tyson: A breakout star in 2024 before injury, his return provides a top target for Leavitt.Key Defensive Players: Safety Xavion Alford and linebacker Keyshaun Elliott, both All-Big 12 selections, are expected back.Kenny Dillingham's Impact: Dillingham has injected energy and passion into the program, connecting with fans and players alike. His coaching acumen was evident in the team's rapid turnaround.Recruiting Momentum: Arizona State is reportedly having success in recruiting, with their 2026 class currently ranked highly. This suggests a program on an upward trajectory.Favorable Schedule (Potentially): While the full schedule presents challenges, they have a home-heavy slate in 2025, with seven games in Tempe.Why the "Kingship" is Not Yet Guaranteed Over the Others:Iowa State: Reached the Big 12 Championship game in 2024 and returns key players, including quarterback Rocco Becht. They have a strong program under Matt Campbell.BYU: While their transfer portal ranking is low, the return of star quarterback Jake Retzlaff and a large portion of their defense, coupled with their 11-win season in 2024, makes them a contender.UCF: As a newer Big 12 member with significant resources and a desire to compete at the Power Four level, they are actively building their roster and could surprise.Baylor: Coach Dave Aranda salvaged his job with a strong finish to 2024 and returns key offensive pieces, including quarterback Sawyer Robertson.Texas Tech: Coach Joey McGuire is building momentum, and they have been active in the transfer portal, aiming to compete for a Big 12 title.Conclusion:Arizona State's surprising Big 12 Championship in 2024, coupled with returning talent and the energy of Kenny Dillingham, certainly positions them as a team with the potential to be a major force in the conference in 2025. They have a strong argument for being considered a top contender.However, declaring them the definitive "new king" over established programs like Iowa State and potentially resurgent teams like BYU, UCF, Baylor, and Texas Tech is premature. All these programs have their own strengths, returning talent, and ambitions for the 2025 season.The Big 12 in 2025 looks to be a highly competitive conference, and while Arizona State has a strong case to be near the top, their sustained success and performance against these other contenders will ultimately determine if they can truly claim the title of the "new king." It will be a fascinating season to watch unfold.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Supply HouseJoin the Trade Master program today at SupplyHouse.com/TM and start ordering plumbing, HVAC, and electrical supplies with just a few clicks. Plus, use promo code SH5 for 5% off your first order. That’s SupplyHouse.com! Amazon Fire TV Stick 4kDid you know your Fire TV is also an Xbox? Turn any TV into your gaming and entertainment hub with Fire TV Stick 4K devices — no console required. Head to Amazon.com/firetvlockedon to get started. Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscription and compatible controller required.Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year. GametimeDownload the Gametime app, create an account, and use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE for $20 off your first purchase. Terms apply. Download Gametime today. What time is it? Gametime.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanD

While the primary focus has been on Rocco Becht's decision to remain at Iowa State despite reported interest from Tennessee, it's important to note that the Volunteers' pursuit of quarterbacks in the transfer portal extended to other Big 12 talents as well.Following the unexpected departure of Nico Iamaleava, Tennessee was indeed actively seeking a quarterback with starting experience. Reports indicate that the Volunteers reached out to several Big 12 quarterbacks, with at least one offer being publicly reported:Josh Hoover (TCU): Multiple sources indicate that Tennessee made a significant push for TCU starting quarterback Josh Hoover. It was reported that the offer included a substantial increase in his NIL earnings, potentially exceeding $1 million more than he was making at TCU. However, Hoover reportedly turned down the offer quickly, opting to remain the starter for the Horned Frogs.While specific reports of Tennessee reaching out to other Big 12 quarterbacks like Rocco Becht (Iowa State), Avery Johnson (Kansas State), or Sam Leavitt (Arizona State) aren't as concretely detailed in the provided search results, the general sentiment suggests that Tennessee was exploring various options within the Big 12.The reasons for these quarterbacks potentially turning down Tennessee could vary:Contentment with Current Program: Players like Becht and Hoover have been highlighted as being happy with their current situations, the coaching staff, and the program culture at Iowa State and TCU, respectively.Starting Opportunity: Remaining at their current schools likely guarantees them a starting role, which might be less certain at a program like Tennessee, even with the open quarterback position.NIL Compensation: While Tennessee might have offered more NIL money in some cases, the quarterbacks might already be well-compensated at their current institutions. In Hoover's case, it was reported he already earns seven figures in NIL.Team Fit and Goals: The quarterbacks might have felt a stronger connection to their current teams and their goals for the upcoming season.In summary, while Rocco Becht's rumored decision to stay at Iowa State garnered attention, he wasn't the only Big 12 quarterback reportedly on Tennessee's radar. Josh Hoover of TCU publicly turned down a lucrative offer from the Volunteers, highlighting the complex factors that go into a player's decision in the transfer portal, extending beyond just the prestige of an SEC program.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Supply HouseJoin the Trade Master program today at SupplyHouse.com/TM and start ordering plumbing, HVAC, and electrical supplies with just a few clicks. Plus, use promo code SH5 for 5% off your first order. That’s SupplyHouse.com! Amazon Fire TV Stick 4kDid you know your Fire TV is also an Xbox? Turn any TV into your gaming and entertainment hub with Fire TV Stick 4K devices — no console required. Head to Amazon.com/firetvlockedon to get started. Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscription and compatible controller required.Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year. GametimeDownload the Gametime app, create an account, and use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE for $20 off your first purchase. Terms apply. Download Gametime today. What time is it? Gametime.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.