The People’s Court Podcast

First, the plaintiff alleges the defendant stole her late husband’s Jet Ski out of a storage unit, so she’s suing. The defendant argues he used to work for the plaintiff’s husband, and the man offered the Jet Ski as partial payment, so he denies owing. Then, the plaintiff and the defendant are both board members at their condominium complex. The defendant physically assaulted the plaintiff one day and caused significant injuries, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff tripped and fell during a dispute they had regarding the building. The defendant insists he never touched the guy. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff says the defendant attacked him and his wife while they were riding on his motorcycle. The cops came and the man ended up paying restitution for the injuries, but he didn’t pay it all, so they’re suing. The defendant says the plaintiff hit the window of his car and threatened his wife, so he punched him. He claims the plaintiff was the aggressor. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff says the defendant is her mother, and they used to be close. Her own mother won’t reimburse the money she loaned her, so she’s suing. The defendant says the money was for a car they were sharing, and the plaintiff became selfish about the car. She denies owing a penny. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff and defendant have been friends since childhood. She and the defendant rented an apartment together and renewed the lease for a second year. The plaintiff says the defendant stopped paying rent, so she’s suing for bills, rent, and other money she is owed. The defendant argues she paid her fair share and doesn’t need to pay. Then, the plaintiff bought a used car from the defendant. She claims the defendant manipulated her and the sales papers to make it look like she paid less, which is fraud. The plaintiff is suing for her money back. The defendant argues he did not falsify any papers. He says the plaintiff paid monthly but then stopped, so he charged her for late fees. The defendant is countersuing for late fees, harassment, and defamation of character. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff was hired by the defendant to clean his raw hide rug. He and the defendant agreed on a price, but the plaintiff says the defendant stopped paying. He’s suing for his payment. The defendant argues the plaintiff didn’t do a good job on the rug because the stains didn’t come out. Then, the plaintiff drives for Lyft. He says the defendant crashed into his car and damaged it badly. He’s suing for the amount of his insurance deductible and lost wages. The defendant argues he was making a right turn and hit the plaintiff only because the plaintiff wedged his car next to the truck in an unsafe position. He doesn’t think he owes the plaintiff anything. Plus, the plaintiff says the defendant slashed her tire. She claims the defendant got her car confused with someone else he had a problem with. The plaintiff is suing for the cost of a tire replacement and lost wages. The defendant denies slashing the plaintiff’s tire but admits to slashing someone else’s tire. He doesn’t think he did it because he was drunk, so he doesn’t think he owes anything. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff brings her father to court. She says the transmission blew on her car, so she took it to her father’s shop for repairs. She says her dad has been taking forever to fix her car and it still barely works. She’s suing for her money back. The defendant argues he spent a lot of money fixing it and the plaintiff cussed him out in front of his customers. He refuses to pay. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant to put extensions in her hair. She claims the extensions started falling out after a few hours, so she’s suing for a refund. The defendant argues she was willing to fix the plaintiff’s hair, but now she doesn’t want to because the plaintiff started blasting her on social media. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff brings his neighbor to court. He says the defendant brought a guest over, and the guest stole the defendant’s key fob and then took the TV. He’s suing for the cost of the television. The defendant says he brought a hooker over to his apartment and the hooker also stole some of his property. He argues the plaintiff is suing the wrong guy. Then, the plaintiff says he hired the defendant to replace the shutters on his house and paid him in full, but then he only completed half the job. He’s suing him for what he’s owed. The defendant says the plaintiff ordered shutters that were the wrong size and wanted the defendant to rehire all his workers and go back a second time to install them for free. Plus, the plaintiff says she was parked on the street having Sunday dinner and heard a loud thunk outside. She claims the uninsured defendant backed into her car and dented it, so she’s suing her for the cost of a rental car. The defendant says she paid for the repairs, but now the greedy plaintiff is coming after her for the cost of a rental car. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff brings his ex-girlfriend to court. He says he loaned the defendant money to help her buy a new car, but now she won’t pay it back, so he’s suing for an unpaid loan. The defendant says she doesn’t owe him anything because they had an arrangement. She’s countersuing for a designer backpack and diamond ring. Then, the plaintiff rented a home from the defendants. He says the sprinklers never worked in the front yard and would water the sidewalk and not the grass. The plaintiff says he turned off the sprinklers because he didn’t want to waste water, but now the defendants won’t return his security deposit, so he’s suing. The defendants argue the plaintiff was responsible for the lawn and he never complained, so they don’t owe him. Plus, the plaintiff was rear-ended by the defendant while waiting at a red light. He claims his truck is destroyed and he lost sleep because of his back pain. He’s suing for loss of sleep. The defendant argues the plaintiff cut him off illegally, and he doesn’t think he owes anything. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff brings his upstairs neighbor to court. He claims the neighbor used dish soap in the dishwasher, which caused a leak. The plaintiff says his electronic devices were ruined because of it, so he’s suing. The defendant admits he caused a leak but doesn’t want to pay because the plaintiff won’t show any examples of his damaged electronics. Then, the plaintiff went on a first date with the defendant. He says the defendant got drunk and got in the plaintiff’s car and crashed it. The car also hit an electric bike and wrecked it. He’s suing for car damages. The defendant argues the plaintiff let her drive the truck, but they were both drinking. She claims she never damaged his car because she just tapped the bike. Plus, the plaintiff and her boyfriend were looking to move into an apartment and the defendant was the broker. They signed the lease, but then she learned she would have to watch her mom’s dog, so she had to back out of the lease because of the apartment’s no-pet policy. She says the landlord gave her the money back, but the defendant refuses to return his commission, so she’s suing. The defendant argues the landlord told her about the no-pet policy a week before they were supposed to move in. He refuses to pay her back. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff hired the attorney, her good friend, to add her children’s names to the deed of her house. She says the defendant took forever to do it, but when she spoke with another attorney, they told her not to do that. She tried getting the deed changed, but now the defendant won’t give her a refund. The defendant argues he did a lot for her and has earned all the money she paid him. Then, the plaintiff brought her car to the defendant’s shop. He got a new alternator installed in her car, but the car problems persisted. She went back to the shop, and the defendant apparently said he would refund her. Now, he won’t give her the money back, so she’s suing. The defendant argues he already refunded the down payment. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff brings his ex-girlfriend and mother of his child to court. The defendant put a car in her name, but the plaintiff says he paid for it and the defendant knows it’s his vehicle. He claims the defendant borrowed the car and refuses to return it, so he’s suing. The defendant argues she put money down on the car and she doesn’t owe him. She claims the plaintiff will do anything to ruin her life, and she’s countersuing for car toll late fees. Then, the plaintiff paid the defendant to install a new skylight in his house. He claims the defendant took his money and ran. Now, he has a huge hole in his roof and squirrels keep coming in his house. He’s suing for his deposit back and extermination fees. The defendant argues the skylight company went out of business, and he sealed the roof. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff and defendant dated for several years. He loaned her money to help her pay for car insurance, but then she broke up with him a month later. He says the defendant won’t pay him back, so he’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff cheated on him. She thinks the plaintiff is just mad at her, and she doesn’t owe him. Then, the plaintiff and his girlfriend rented an apartment from the defendant. He told the defendant they were moving out, but now the defendant won’t return his security deposit. He’s suing to get his money back. The defendant argues the plaintiff disappeared and left the apartment a complete mess. He says he’s owed money, so he’s countersuing for the balance of the repairs, harassment, and emotional distress. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff applied for an apartment and paid a deposit fee. She changed her mind about the apartment, but the defendant won’t give the plaintiff her money back, so she’s suing. The defendant doesn’t think he owes her anything. Then, the plaintiff brought his car to the defendant’s car because it wouldn’t start. He got the car back, but the problem persisted. He took his car to another repair shop, and that repairman said the first shop never fixed the actual problem. He’s suing for a refund. The defendant is countersuing for money he accidentally refunded. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff was tricked into buying furniture, including a couch, from the defendant. She claims the items never got delivered, so she’s suing for a refund. The defendant argues the plaintiff got too impatient even though he told her the manufacturers deal with delays. He’s countersuing for defamation. Then, the plaintiff dated the defendant, and he loaned her money for a trip and to help pay for her electricity bills. He claims that when he asked for his money, she blocked him on all platforms. He’s suing for what he’s owed. The defendant argues he only started arguing with her about the money after they broke up. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff brings his mom to court. He says the defendant called the police to conduct a welfare check on him, and they broke the door and lock. He’s suing for the cost of repairs. The defendant argues her son’s grandmother was worried about him because no one heard from him for several months. She doesn’t think she’s responsible because the cops broke the door, and she is just a concerned mother. The plaintiff loaned her boyfriend’s brother money so he could buy Christmas presents. The defendant still hasn’t paid her back after three years, so she’s suing. The defendant argues he gave the money to his brother. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff claims the defendant's dog attacked hers, so she's suing for vet bills. The defendant feels bad about what happened, but the plaintiff's dog wasn't leashed at the time. Then, the plaintiff brings his ex-girlfriend to court. The plaintiff claims the defendant threw out his clothes and PlayStation, so he's suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff was a freeloader who never paid rent when they lived together. She tossed his stuff out because she couldn't stand to see it. The defendant believes they're even because of all the money the defendant owes her. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff paid to rent the defendant's cosmetology license so she could open a beauty bar. The defendant was supposed to register her business, but she didn't, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant claims she was offered a manager position at the plaintiff's shop, but it never happened because the plaintiff didn't have her business properly registered. The defendant is countersuing for lost wages Then, the plaintiff brings her former tenant to court for an unpaid water bill she's suing him for. The defendant admits he was struggling financially at the time, but the plaintiff already took the water bill out of his security, so he doesn't owe her. The defendant is countersuing for the remaining balance on his security deposit. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff took his car to the defendant's repair shop for new tires. The rear tire flew off shortly after, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff requested rims that were too big for his vehicle, so the defendant doesn't feel he's responsible for the damages. The plaintiff claims the defendant illegally towed his vehicle, and he's suing for the value of the car. The defendant says he was called by the plaintiff's leasing office because the vehicle was parked in someone else's spot. Unfortunately, the car was sent to auction because the plaintiff didn't pay the fee to get it out, but that's not the defendant's fault. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff hired the defendant to install some new carpeting in his house. The plaintiff asked for some free leftover carpet to create some mats, but when he went to pick it up, the defendant charged him. The plaintiff also claims the carpeting has faded, so he's suing. The defendant argues it took him a lot of money and time to find the leftover carpet pieces. Additionally, the defendant insists the carpeting is not faded, and this lawsuit is meritless. The plaintiff loaned the defendant money to pay rent, but he hasn't yet paid it back, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the loan was a gift, and the plaintiff is only turning it into a loan because he's obsessed with him or something. The defendant is countersuing for lost work. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff built two composting receptacles on the defendant's property. However, the defendant failed to pay the plaintiff and threw away some of his tools, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff built the composting receptacles for the community and just used her property as a storage area. The defendant is countersuing for the cost to fix the damages to the side of her house. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff secured a rental van on her credit card for the defendant, her cousin, when they were on vacation. The defendant failed to pay it back, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the trip was a disaster because the plaintiff invited a strange man and caused damage to the rental car. The defendant insists the plaintiff is just trying to tack on the costs to her. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff was picking someone up at the airport when the defendant crashed into his car. The plaintiff is suing for damages. The defendant argues she looked before pulling out and as she did, the plaintiff changed lanes without warning and cut her off. The defendant is countersuing for lost wages. Then, the plaintiff is an Uber driver, and the defendant arranged for a pickup. The plaintiff claims the defendant smashed his door into a metal garbage can, damaging it, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says the plaintiff refused to take him to his destination. When he got out of the car, the defendant gently opened the door. The defendant admits he lightly scratched the door but nothing more. The defendant is countersuing for counseling and lost wages. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff met the defendant on a dating app. He claims he loaned her money for car insurance, but the defendant failed to pay it back, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff offered her the loan as a gift. Then, the plaintiff paid the defendant, a contractor, money to buy materials for a construction job, but he quit and took off with the money. The plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant argues he did all the demo work, but the plaintiff never paid him for his services, only the materials. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff brings her son into court because she bought him a car with the agreement he'd make payments. Unfortunately, the plaintiff says her son failed to put up the money, so she's suing. The defendant argues he shared the vehicle with his mother, but she never let him drive it, so he denies owing. The plaintiff sold furniture to the defendant, but she failed to pay in full. The plaintiff is suing for the remaining balance. The defendant insists she paid for all the belongings she agreed to buy. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff brings his ex-wife to court because he claims she owes him money for a washer and dryer, as well as a dresser. The plaintiff claims all of the belongings in question are hers. The defendant is countersuing for harassment and lost wages. The plaintiff brings his friend to court because he claims she owes him money for a loan. The defendant says the money the plaintiff gave her was for an apartment he was going to move into after he was released from jail. The defendant is countersuing for an ounce of marijuana she paid for but never received. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff hired the defendant, a fashion designer, to create an outfit for her birthday party. When she received the outfit, the plaintiff was not happy and had to cancel her photo shoot, so she's suing for a refund. The defendant argues the plaintiff is just super picky, and he even made her two different outfits. Nothing would have made her happy, according to the defendant The plaintiff was driving her car when the defendant ran into her, causing damages. The plaintiff says the defendant doesn't have insurance, and she's suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff caused the accident, not her. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiff alleges the defendants — her ex-husband and his new wife — stole her son's cell phone and destroyed it with a hammer, so she's suing. The defendants say the son in question isn't allowed to have access to the phone. Besides, they accidentally ran over the phone — they didn't destroy it on purpose. Then, the plaintiff brings her nephew to court because she gave him a loan to fix his car and buy a phone. However, the plaintiff's nephew hasn't yet paid back the money, so she's suing. The defendant claims he repaired the plaintiff's car for free, so he believes they're even. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff had to board her dog at the defendant's facility. While there, the plaintiff's dog was bitten, and she didn't even find out until she picked up her pet. The plaintiff is suing the defendant for vet bills. The defendant argues the plaintiff's dog tried to steal food from another. The defendant checked the dog and didn't notice any serious injuries. The plaintiff hired the defendant to cater her birthday party. The food she tasted before the party was not the same quality as the food he served. The plaintiff is suing for a refund because her party was ruined as a result. The defendant says he was cooking the food when he received a call from a store saying the chicken was recalled. The defendant scrambled and had to find new chicken at the last minute. Besides, the defendant believes he provided great food and denies owing. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff hired the defendant to create custom T-shirts. When the plaintiff received the merchandise, he claims the printing was off and the sizes were wrong, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant says the plaintiff wanted the shirts rushed, and the defendant did the best he could under the circumstances. Besides, the defendant told the plaintiff he doesn't give refunds. Then the plaintiff is suing the defendant because he claims he owes him a commission for a vinyl record sale he helped with. The defendant argues the plaintiff didn't earn his commission, so he owes nothing. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff prepaid the defendant for landscaping services, but the plaintiff changed his mind and hired someone else. The defendant said he would give him the refund, but he didn't, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says the plaintiff went behind his back and hired some of his employees. The defendant also claims he returned the money minus the work and costs, so he doesn't believe he owes any more cash Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiffs rented an apartment from the defendant. They had to move out due to a bug problem. However, the defendant is illegally withholding their security, so the plaintiffs are suing. The defendant insists the plaintiffs caused the cockroach infestation in addition to damaging the place. The defendant is countersuing for additional repairs needed. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff claims his daughter and her husband owe him money for an unpaid loan to help them pay rent, so he's suing. The defendants argue the plaintiff said they didn't have to pay back the loan. Then, the plaintiff pawned a valuable gold coin and necklace at the defendant's shop. The guy sold the plaintiff's stuff without permission, so he's suing. The defendant argues he gave the plaintiff the proper notice, so he denies owing a dime. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff used to be great friends with the defendant, and they purchased a boat together. However, the defendant sold the boat at a huge profit and refuses to give the plaintiff his fair share, so he's suing. The defendant insists he bought the plaintiff out of his share of the boat before selling it. Then, the plaintiff brings her cousin, the defendant, to court because she owes her money for flights she booked. The defendant had to back out of the trip last minute because she refused to get a vaccine, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the trip was meant to be a gift. Besides, the defendant claims the plaintiff canceled on her. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiffs are a father and son. The son rented an apartment from the defendant, but the defendant had a problem with the plaintiff’s pet ferret. He had to move out, so he’s suing for the cost of the security deposit and a listing fee. The defendant argues the plaintiff never told him about the ferret and he had an allergic reaction to it. He says the animal stunk up their apartment. Then, the plaintiff brought her car to the defendants’ shop, and they did a terrible job. She says they never painted the roof and left drip marks on it. She’s suing for the cost of repainting the vehicle. The defendants argue they didn’t redo the roof because there weren’t any dents, so there wasn’t anything to fix. They claim they did everything they could to make the plaintiff happy, but she just wasn’t having it. They’re countersuing for unpaid work. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff hired the defendant to move a piano out of her house. She says the defendant’s workers damaged her door and porch while moving it, so she’s suing for damages. The defendant admits he hit the piano on the door, but there’s no proof of the porch. He doesn’t think he owes her because she’s suing so many months after it happened. Then. the plaintiff’s kitchen flooded due to a clogged pipe and damaged the place. He claims the flood was a larger problem with the condo and not something specific with his unit. He had to clean up the mess, so he’s suing for legal and cleaning fees. The defendant argues the plaintiff caused the pipe damage, so the condo board doesn’t need to pay. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff brings her neighbor to court. She argues the defendant’s vegetation is unruly and fell onto her patio. She says she’s asked him several times to get his plants under control, but he refuses. She’s suing for the cost of tree trimming. The defendant argues the plaintiff never called him in the first place, so he doesn’t owe. Then, the plaintiff brings her neighbor to court. She claims the defendant leaves rotten food outside and her dog ate it. She thinks the defendant poisoned the dog, so she’s suing for vet bills. The defendant argues she has been leaving breadcrumbs out for birds and would never harm a dog. She says the plaintiff’s dog is vicious and she even filed a complaint with animal control. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiffs loaned the defendant money to help rent a wedding venue because the defendant was marrying a family friend who they think of as their son. They claim the defendant ran off the money and hasn’t paid them back, so they’re suing. The defendant argues her now-ex-husband stole the money, and she’s suing him to get it back. The plaintiff brought his dog to the park, and he claims the defendants’ dog attacked his dog. The dog got severely injured, so he’s suing for vet bills and pain and suffering. The defendants argue they told the plaintiff not to come near them with his dog, but he did it anyway. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff brings his daughter’s stepfather to court. He says the defendant backed his car into his car and caused major damage, so he’s suing. The defendant argues he agreed to fix the damage that he caused, but the plaintiff wants him to fix every little detail, which he refuses to do. He’s countersuing for defamation. Then, the plaintiff was attending an event and claims the defendant’s dog bit him. He was in major pain and had to seek medical treatment. The defendant won’t pay for the medical bills, so he’s suing for pain and suffering and emotional distress. The defendant argues her dog sniffed the plaintiff but never bit him. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff owns a skin care business and was relocating from one state to another. She rented space from the defendant, but she claims the lease was fraudulent. She’s suing for a rent refund and her security deposit. The defendant says she painted and renovated the room for the plaintiff. She argues it’s not her fault the plaintiff backed out, so she refuses to pay. Then, the plaintiff was hired by the defendant to build a fence around his property. He claims the defendant’s neighbor got angry about it, and now the defendant isn’t paying him. He’s suing for what he’s owed. The defendant doesn’t think she owes anything because she wasn’t happy with the work. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff hired the defendant to move her things to a new home, but the movers damaged lots of her belongings, so she’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff saw everything go into the storage unit near her house and she didn’t say a word. He’s countersuing for money he’s owed on the move. Then, the plaintiff rented a condo from the defendant, but she didn’t end up going because of COVID-19 restrictions. When she made new accommodations with him, he told her he sold the condo and he wasn’t giving back her deposit, so she’s suing for the cost of her vacation. The defendant argues he let her reschedule three times and she had plenty of times to visit. He says it’s not his fault she kept changing her mind. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff hired the defendant to make a mixtape for his album. He says he paid for the defendant to mix 20 songs, but he only made a few of them, so he’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff slandered him online and he did, in fact, make all 20 songs. He’s countersuing for lost wages due to defamation. Then, the plaintiff bought a new car and brought the car to the defendant’s business for a repair. She claims the mechanic broke her seatbelt while her car was in for a different reason. Then, someone stole her fuzzy pink dice from her rearview mirror. She’s suing for damages. The defendant argues the mechanic took the dice off the mirror because it’s illegal to have them on, then left them on the seat. She doesn’t think she owes anything. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff brings her neighbor to court. She says the defendant crashed into her car, and she thinks it was vengeance because they don’t get along. She’s suing for car damages. The defendant thinks the plaintiff is a troublemaker and she won’t leave him alone. He’s countersuing for pain and suffering. The plaintiff brings his ex-girlfriend to court. He says he loaned her money on several different occasions, but she hasn’t paid him back. He’s suing for what he’s owed. The defendant argues she gave him a lot of money when they were together. She thinks this lawsuit is just a way of harassing her. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff rented a room in the defendant’s house. She says the house was disgusting because there were bugs and the septic tank overflowed. She moved out and is suing for her security deposit back. The defendant argues the plaintiff was the one who caused the septic tank to overflow, and she was a nightmare tenant. Plus, the plaintiff went to the defendant’s salon to get her hair straightened. She says the defendant used a chemical in her hair, and now her hair is ruined. She’s suing for three years’ worth of salon services. The defendant argues the plaintiff refuses to cut off her damaged hair, which is why it looks bad. He’s countersuing for business interference. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff rehomed her dog at the defendant’s house, but the defendant said the dog didn’t get along her own pet. When the plaintiff went to pick up the dog, he was bloody and injured. She had to take him to the vet, so she’s suing for medical bills. The defendant argues the dog was vicious and she never did anything to him. The plaintiff rented a room at the defendant’s hostel, but then his clothes were stolen. He’s suing for damages. The defendant says she can’t put cameras in rooms, but she did provide a locker with a lock for the plaintiff to put his belongings in, so it’s not her fault if he didn’t use it. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff brings one of her sisters to court. She says the defendant broke her television and Xbox, so she’s suing for what she’s owed. The defendant argues the plaintiff’s husband put her in a chokehold, and he’s the one who fell on the TV. The plaintiff brings her two siblings to courts. She says she loaned her late brother’s car to her other siblings, but they crashed it, so she’s suing for the cost of the car and the tow. The defendants don’t think they owe her because it wasn’t their fault. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff rented an apartment to the defendant. He claims the defendant pushed him and injured him. He also says her boyfriend slashed his tires, so he’s suing for medical expenses, ripped tires, and pain and suffering. The defendant argues the plaintiff pushed her, so she pushed him back. She’s countersuing for emotional distress and moving costs Then, the plaintiff was hired by the defendants to clean and reinstall their drapes. He says they haven’t paid, so he’s suing for what he’s owed. The defendants claim they agreed to have the plaintiff clean the drapes but not replace the linings them. They think he’s committing elder abuse by upcharging them. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff claims her ex-boyfriend keeps slashing her tires, so she's suing. The defendant denies slashing the plaintiff's tires. He believes someone else must be causing the damage because it's not him. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendants to build her another bedroom in her house. The plaintiff alleges the defendants did a terrible job, so she had to hire someone else. The plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendants insist they did an excellent job. They're countersuing for wages owed and supplies. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff hired the defendant to redo the bathrooms in his house. The defendant barely did anything and refuses to return payments, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists he put a lot of work into the plaintiff's house. The plaintiff failed to provide all of the materials he needed to complete the job, according to the defendant. Then, the plaintiff brought his car to the defendant's carwash. In the middle of the wash, the plaintiff's car crashed into another vehicle, so the plaintiff is suing for damages. The defendant defends himself and says the car in front of the plaintiff's applied their brakes. The defendant doesn't believe he or his business is responsible for the damage Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiffs rented a house from the defendant but decided not to renew the lease. The plaintiffs are in court because the defendant won't return the security deposit they're owed, so they're suing. The defendant argues the plaintiffs didn't give him 60 days' notice, so he doesn't owe anything. The defendant is countersuing for loss of rent Then, the plaintiff took a walk in her neighborhood when the defendant's dog bit her. The plaintiff had to get a shot and medication, so she's suing for medical costs. The defendant believes her dog just barked at the plaintiff. Her Yorkie would never bite anyone. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says the defendant backed into his car, so he's suing for damages. The defendant argues he has backup sensors on his vehicle and never even hit the plaintiff's car. Then, the plaintiff hired and paid the defendant to install some pipes, but he never did the job, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant is in court defending himself and says he went to the house three times, but the plaintiff never purchased the materials like she agreed to do. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices