So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast

Can a course on conservatism shake up the liberal status quo on campus? Tufts University professor Eitan Hersh presents his unique class on American conservatism and its impact on campus free speech and open dialogue. He discusses the challenges and opportunities of teaching conservative thought in a predominantly liberal academic environment. Eitan Hersh is a professor of political science. He earned his Ph.D. from Harvard University in 2011 and was a faculty member at Yale University from 2011-2017. In March, professor Hersh's course on conservatism was profiled in Boston Magazine under the headline, "A Conservative Thought Experiment on a Liberal College Campus." Timestamps 00:00 Intro 02:02 Prof. Hersh's personal political beliefs 03:47 Political diversity among faculty and students 05:14 Hersh's journey to academia 06:07 What does a conservatism course look like? 09:30 His colleagues' response to the course 10:29 The challenges of discussing controversial topics 13:28 FIRE's data on difficult campus topics 17:50 How have campus dynamics changed 19:42 Institutional neutrality 39:14 What are faculty concerned about? 42:18 What is Hersh expecting as students return to campus? 46:41 Outro Transcript is HERE.

How has 19th-century English philosopher John Stuart Mill influenced America's conception of free speech and the First Amendment? In their new book, "The Supreme Court and the Philosopher: How John Stuart Mill Shaped U.S. Free Speech Protections," co-authors Eric Kasper and Troy Kozma look at how the Supreme Court has increasingly aligned its interpretation of free expression with Mill's philosophy, as articulated in "On Liberty." Eric Kasper is professor of political science at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, where he serves as the director of the Menard Center for Constitutional Studies. Troy Kozma is a professor of philosophy and the academic chair at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire - Barron County. Timestamps 00:00 Intro 02:26 Book's origin 06:51 Who is John Stuart Mill? 10:09 What is the "harm principle"? 16:30 Early Supreme Court interpretation of the First Amendment 26:25 What was Justice Holmes' dissent in Abrams v. U.S.? 30:28 Why did Justice Brandeis join Holmes' dissents? 36:10 What are loyalty oaths? 40:36 Justice Black's nuanced view of the First Amendment 43:33 What were Mill's views on race and education? 50:42 Private beliefs vs. public service? 52:40 Commercial speech 55:51 Where do we stand today? 1:03:32 Outro Transcript is HERE

Some argue that Section 230 allows the internet to flourish. Others argue it allows harmful content to flourish. Christopher Cox knows something about Section 230: He co-wrote it. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is an American law passed in 1996 that shields websites from liability for content posted on their sites by users. What does Rep. Cox make of the law today? Rep. Cox was a 17-year member of the House of Representatives and is a former chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Timestamps 0:00 Intro 2:43 Did Section 230 create the modern internet? 7:48 America's technological advancement 11:33 Section 230's support for good faith content moderation 18:00 User privacy and age verification? 25:37 Rep. Cox's early experiences with the internet 30:24 Did we need Section 230 in the first place? 37:51 Are there any changes Rep. Cox would make to Section 230 now? 42:40 How does AI impact content creation and moderation? 47:23 The future of Section 230 54:31 Closing thoughts 57:30 Outro Show notes: Transcript Section 230 text "The Twenty-Six Words that Created the Internet" by Jeff Kosseff Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe Inc. (S.D.N.Y. 1991) Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy Services Co. (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1995) "Section 230: A Retrospective" by Chris Cox Section 230: Legislative History (Electronic Frontier Foundation)

Did overheated political rhetoric lead to the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump? On today's show we explore political violence: its history, its causes, and its relationship with free speech. Flemming Rose is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute. He previously served as foreign affairs editor and culture editor at the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten. In 2005, he was principally responsible for publishing the cartoons that initiated the Muhammad cartoons controversy. Nadine Strossen is a professor emerita at New York Law School, former president of the ACLU, and a senior fellow at FIRE. Jacob Mchangama is the founder and executive director of The Future of Free Speech. He is a research professor at Vanderbilt University and a senior fellow at FIRE. Timestamps 0:00 Intro 2:45 Initial reactions to Trump assassination attempt 7:39 Can we blame political violence on rhetoric? 15:56 Weimar and Nazi Germany 26:05 Is the Constitution a "suicide pact"? 39:21 Is violence ever justified? 49:24 Censorship in the wake of tragedy and true threats 59:06 Closing thoughts 1:04:54 Outro Show notes: Episode transcript "Freedom of expression and social conflict" by Christian Bjørnskov and Jacob Mchangama FIRE's 2024 College Free Speech Rankings (featuring data on college student support for violence) Recent court ruling in DeRay McKesson protest case "The Tyranny of Silence" by Flemming Rose "Free Speech: A History from Socrates to Social Media" by Jacob Mchangama

The Supreme Court term is over. We review its First Amendment cases. Joining the show are FIRE Chief Counsel Bob Corn-Revere, FIRE General Counsel Ronnie London, and Institute for Justice Deputy Litigation Director Robert McNamara. Become a FIRE Member today and gain access to live monthly webinars where you can ask questions of FIRE staff. The next webinar is July 8 at 1 p.m. ET. We will take your questions about the Supreme Court term. Show Notes: Transcript Timestamps 0:00 Intro 2:53 Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton 31:02 NRA v. Vullo 46:57 Murthy v. Missouri 1:06:04 Gonzales v. Trevino 1:17:58 Vidal v. Elster 1:26:04 O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed 1:34:00 Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (the Chevron deference case) 1:37:26 Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton (forthcoming SCOTUS case) 1:38:30 Outro

There is a movement afoot to restrict young people's access to social media and pornography. Critics of social media and online porn argue that they can be harmful to minors, and states across the country are taking up the cause, considering laws that would impose age-verification, curfews, parental opt-ins, and other restrictions. Meanwhile, critics of the critics argue that the evidence of harm isn't so conclusive and that many of the proposed restrictions violate core civil liberties such as privacy and free speech. So, who's right? Clare Morell is a senior policy analyst at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and the author of the forthcoming book, "The Tech Exit: A Manifesto for Freeing Our Kids." Ari Cohn is free speech counsel at TechFreedom, a technology think tank. Timestamps 0:00 Intro 2:17 The alleged harms of social media 11:31 Just another technological moral panic? 25:49 How is internet access currently restricted for minors? 41:17 The age verification problem 1:00:27 Assessing the First Amendment problems 1:07:21 Voluntary measures parents can take 1:25:30 Outro Shownotes Transcript "The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness" by Jonathan Haidt "Surgeon General: Why I'm Calling for a Warning Label on Social Media Platforms" by Vivek H. Murthy

It is said that censorship is the strongest drive in human nature — with sex being a weak second. But what happens when these two primordial drives clash? Does censorship or sex win out? Nadine Strossen is a professor emerita at New York Law School, a former president of the ACLU, and a senior fellow at FIRE. She is also the author of "Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex, and the Fight for Women's Rights." First released in 1995, the book was reissued this year with a new preface. Mary Anne Franks is a law professor at George Washington University and the president and legislative and tech policy director of the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative. She is the author of "The Cult of the Constitution: Our Deadly Devotion to Guns and Free Speech" and the forthcoming "Fearless Speech: Breaking Free from the First Amendment." Show Notes: Transcript Timestamps 0:00 Intro 2:17 Defining pornography 7:20 Is porn protected by the First Amendment? 11:10 Revenge porn 22:05 Origins of "Defending Pornography" 25:06 Andrea Dworkin and Catharine MacKinnon 29:20 Can porn be consensual? 35:02 Dworkin/MacKinnon model legislation 52:20 Porn in Canada 56:07 Is it possible to ban porn? 1:03:26 College professor's porn hobby 1:12:39 Outro

Did 26 words from an American law passed in 1996 create the internet? Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act says that interactive websites and applications cannot be held legally liable for the content posted on their sites by their users. Without the law, it's likely Facebook, Amazon, Reddit, Yelp, and X wouldn't exist — at least not in their current form. But some say the law shields large tech companies from liability for enabling, or even amplifying, harmful content. On today's show, we discuss Section 230, recent efforts to reform it, and new proposals for content moderation on the internet. Marshall Van Alstyne is a professor of information systems at Boston University. Robert Corn-Revere is FIRE's chief counsel. Timestamps 0:00 Intro 3:52 The origins of Section 230? 6:40 Section 230's "forgotten provision" 13:29 User vs. platform control over moderation 23:24 Harms allegedly enabled by Section 230 40:17 Solutions 46:03 Private market for moderation 1:02:42 Case study: Hunter Biden laptop story 1:09:19 "Duty of care" standard 1:17:49 The future of Section 230 1:20:35 Outro Show Notes - Show Transcript - Hearing on a Legislative Proposal to Sunset Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (May 22. 2024) - "Platform Revolution" by Marshall Van Alstyne - "The Mind of the Censor and the Eye of the Beholder" by Robert Corn-Revere - "Protocols, Not Platforms: A Technological Approach to Free Speech" by Mike Masnick - "Sunset of Section 230 Would Force Big Tech's Hand" By Cathy McMorris Rodgers and Frank Pallone Jr. - "Buy This Legislation or We'll Kill the Internet" By Christopher Cox and Ron Wyden - "Free Speech, Platforms & The Fake News Problem" (2021) by Marshall Van Alstyne - "Free Speech and the Fake News Problem" (2023) by Marshall Van Alstyne - "It's Time to Update Section 230" by Michael D. Smith and Marshall Van Alstyne "Now It's Harvard Business Review Getting Section 230 Very, Very Wrong" by Mike Masnick

The First Amendment forbids government censorship. Private institutions, on the other hand, are generally free to restrict speech. How should we think about private censorship and its role within a liberal society? On today's episode, we're joined by J.P. Messina, an assistant professor in the philosophy department at Purdue University and the author of the new book, "Private Censorship." Also on the show is Aaron Terr, FIRE's director of public advocacy. Timestamps 0:00 Introduction 3:10 The origin story of "Private Censorship" 8:29 How does FIRE figure out what to weigh in on? 12:04 Examples of private censorship 18:24 Regulating speech at work 22:21 Regulating speech on social media platforms 30:09 Is social media essentially a public utility? 35:50 Are internet service providers essentially public utilities? 44:43 Social media vs. ISPs 51:02 Censorship on search engines 59:47 Defining illiberalism outside of government censorship 1:16:06 Outro Show Notes Episode transcript Packingham v. North Carolina (2017) Cloudflare's announcement regarding the Daily Stormer

On May 1, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Antisemitism Awareness Act by a vote of 320 to 91. Proponents of the law say it is necessary to address anti-Semitic discrimination on college campuses. Opponents argue it threatens free speech. Who's right? Kenneth Stern was the lead drafter of the definition of anti-Semitism used in the act. But he said the definition was never meant to punish speech. Rather, it was drafted to help data collectors write reports. Stern is the director of the Bard Center for the Study of Hate. His most recent book is titled, "The Conflict Over the Conflict: The Israel/Palestine Campus Debate." Timestamps 0:00 Introduction 04:06 Introducing Ken Stern 7:59 Can hate speech codes work? 11:13 Off-campus hate speech codes 13:33 Drafting the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition 21:53 How should administrators judge anti-Semitism without the IHRA definition? 27:29 Is there a rise in unlawful discrimination on campuses today? 40:20 Opposition to the Antisemitism Awareness Act 43:10 Defenses of the Antisemitism Awareness Act 51:34 Enshrinement of the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism in state laws 53:57 Is the IHRA definition internally consistent? 59:21 How will the Senate vote? 1:01:16 Outro Show Notes IHRA definition of anti-Semitism The Antisemitism Awareness Act Transcript

Host Nico Perrino joins his FIRE colleagues Will Creeley and Alex Morey to answer questions about the recent campus unrest and its First Amendment implications. Timestamps 0:00 Introduction 0:41 What is FIRE?/campus unrest 5:44 What are the basic First Amendment principles for campus protest? 11:30 Student encampments 18:09 Exceptions to the First Amendment 29:01 Can administrators limit access to non-students/faculty? 34:13 Denying recognition to Students for Justice in Palestine 36:26 Were protesters at UT Austin doing anything illegal? 40:54 The USC valedictorian 45:09 What does "objectively offensive" mean? / Does Davis apply to colleges? 46:55 Is it illegal to protest too loudly? 50:03 What options do colleges have to moderate/address hate speech? 54:20 Does calling for genocide constitute bullying/harassment? 59:09 Wrapping up on the situation Show Notes "USC canceling valedictorian's commencement speech looks like calculated censorship," Alex Morey "Emerson College: Conservative Student Group Investigated for Distributing 'China Kinda Sus' Stickers," FIRE's case files "HATE: Why We Should Resist it With Free Speech, Not Censorship," Nadine Strossen "Defending My Enemy: American Nazis, the Skokie Case, and the Risks of Freedom," Aryeh Neier (pdf) "David Goldberger, lead attorney in 'the Skokie case,'" "So to Speak" Ep. 118 Transcript

In America, hate speech is generally protected by the First Amendment. But should it be? Today's guest is out with a new book, "Hate Speech is Not Free: The Case Against First Amendment Protection." W. Wat Hopkins is emeritus professor of communication at Virginia Tech, where he taught communication law and cyberspace law. Transcript of Interview: https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/so-speak-podcast-transcript-should-first-amendment-protect-hate-speech Timestamps 0:00 Introduction 5:34 Why write about hate speech?8:50 Has the Supreme Court ruled on hate speech? 13:56 What speech falls outside First Amendment protection? 16:44 The history of the First Amendment 20:00 Fighting words and Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942) 24:00 How does the Supreme Court determine what speech is protected? 35:24 Defining hate speech 38:54 Debating the value of hate speech 44:02 Defining hate speech (again) 50:30 Abuses of hate speech codes 1:00:10 Skokie 1:02:39 Current Supreme Court and hate speech 1:06:00 Outro Show Notes Scotland's "Hate Crime and Public Order Act" Matal v. Tam (2017) Snyder v. Phelps (2011) Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association (2011) United States v. Stevens (2010) Virginia v. Black (2003) R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992) National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie (1977) Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley (1972) Beauharnais v. Illinois (1952) Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942) "HATE: Why We Should Resist it With Free Speech, Not Censorship" by Nadine Strossen

In late 2013, some of us at FIRE started noticing a change on college campuses. Students, who were previously the strongest constituency for free speech on campus, were turning against free speech. They began appealing to administrators more frequently for protection from different speakers and using the language of trauma and safety to justify censorship. What changed? Neil Howe may have an answer. He is a historian, economist, and demographer who speaks frequently on generational change. His most recent book, "The Fourth Turning is Here," was published last year. Howe argues that history has seasonal rhythms of growth, maturation, entropy, and rebirth and that different generations take on different attributes reflecting their place in the cycle. Joining Howe and host Nico Perrino for the conversation is FIRE President and CEO Greg Lukianoff, co-author of "The Canceling of the American Mind." Timestamps 0:00 Introduction 6:10 Neil's intent with his book, "Generations" 13:12 Pattern in American history 17:08 The nomad archetype 25:00 Covid and the younger generation 27:28 Do people shape events? 35:35 Gen-Xers and Millennials 41:45 The Fourth Turning 50:24 William James' "The Moral Equivalent of War" 57:08 Are Gen-Z actually Millennials? 58:10 Dominant generations 01:06:40 How do generational cycles impact civil liberties? 01:10:57 Summary of Millennials 01:18:15 Peaceful periods lead to greater inequality 1:19:16 Outro Show Notes Neil Howe's Substack, "Demography Unplugged" Greg Lukianoff's Substack, "The Eternally Radical Idea"

"I have never seen a Supreme Court term that is as consequential as this one is going to be," said FIRE Chief Counsel Bob Corn-Revere, previewing this term's First Amendment cases. On today's show, we analyze the oral arguments in four of those cases: NRA v. Vullo, Murthy v. Missouri (formerly Missouri v. Biden), Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, and NetChoice, LLC, v. Paxton. We also discuss the court's decision in two cases involving government officials blocking their critics on social media. Joining the show are Corn-Revere, FIRE General Counsel Ronnie London, and FIRE Director of Public Advocacy Aaron Terr. Timestamps 0:00 Introduction 3:29 NRA v. Vullo 26:05 Murthy v. Missouri 50:41 Netchoice cases 1:11:26 Lindke v. Freed and O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier 1:21:24 Outro Show Notes NRA v. Vullo oral argument transcript Bantam Books, Inc. et. al v Sullivan et al. (1963) Murthy v. Missouri oral argument transcript Moody v. NetChoice, LLC oral argument transcript NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton oral argument transcript Lindke v. Freed and O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier decisions 'So to Speak' on Substack Transcript

There is a recurring debate in the free speech community regarding whether money is speech. Bitcoin-focused entrepreneur, writer, and philosopher Robert Breedlove joins us today to help resolve the debate. Describing money as "the language of human action," Robert makes the case that money, like the cryptocurrency Bitcoin, is information and should be free from government regulation and manipulation. During this longer-than-usual episode, Robert and Nico discuss everything from Keynesian economics and 3D-printed firearms to the Chinese Communist Party. Robert is the host of the popular podcast, "The 'What is Money?' Show," which dives into the nature of money by asking guests one simple question: What is money? In 2020, he co-authored the book, "Thank God for Bitcoin: The Creation, Corruption and Redemption of Money." Timestamps 0:00 Introduction 3:56 Robert's background 19:21 What is Austrian economics? 24:23 Is money speech? 44:48 Can money express irrational things? 51:59 Is access to perfect information always a good thing? 1:05:17 Bitcoin and anonymity 1:18:14 Prediction markets 1:31:49 Is code speech? 1:39:59 Is economic freedom more fundamental than freedom of speech? 1:49:13 Regulating bitcoin 1:55:16 Bitcoin ETFs 1:57:03 Rapid-fire Bitcoin questions 2:03:15 Does more access to information make the world a better place? 2:06:53 Outro Show Notes "The 'What is Money?' Show" "The Creature from Jekyll Island" by G Edward Griffin "The Bitcoin Standard" by Saifedean Ammous "The Use of Knowledge in Society" by Friedrich Hayek "The Logic of Scientific Discovery" by Karl Popper "Areopagitica" by John Milton Transcript

On today's episode, we discuss Alexei Navalny's death, Vladimir Putin, censorship in Russia, and Samizdat Online, an anti-censorship platform that grants users living under authoritarian regimes access to news and other censored content. Yevgeny "Genia" Simkin is the co-founder of Samizdat Online and Stanislav "Stas" Kucher is its chief content officer. Timestamps 0:00 Introduction 2:25 Alexei Navalny 8:53 The state of Russian opposition 20:48 The origins of Samizdat Online 28:17 How does Samizdat Online circumvent censorship? 35:16 Could Yevgeny Prigozhin have overthrown Putin? 41:03 The progression of Putin's regime 58:08 How can people help? 59:56 Outro Show notes Statement by Russian prison service on Alexei Navalny's death The Anti-Corruption Foundation (nonprofit established by Alexei Navalny) Samizdat Online "Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible" by Peter Pomerantsev Transcript Past related episodes Ep. 108: A history of (dis)information wars in the Soviet Union and beyond Ep. 156: What Russians don't know about the war in Ukraine Ep. 157: Former BBC bureau chief Konstantin Eggert and what you need to know about censorship in Russia

On today's free speech news roundup, we discuss the recent NetChoice oral argument, Taylor Swift, doxxing, October 7 fallout on campus, and Satan in Iowa. Joining us on the show are Alex Morey, FIRE director of Campus Rights Advocacy; Aaron Terr, director of Public Advocacy; and Ronnie London, our general counsel. Timestamps 0:00 Introduction 0:44 NetChoice oral arguments 19:39 Taylor Swift cease and desist letter 29:20 Publishing unlawfully obtained information 39:28 Harvard and doxxing 47:44 Princeton no contact orders 55:52 Columbia law denies recognition to Law Students Against Antisemitism 1:02:38 Columbia adopts Kalven Report 1:06:06 Indiana University art exhibit canceled, professor suspended 1:14:55 Satan in Iowa 1:21:59 Outro Show Notes "So to Speak" 2023-24 Supreme Court Preview (contains discussion of NetChoice cases) Correspondence between Taylor Swift and Jack Sweeney's attorneys Bartnicki v. Vopper (2001) Princeton no contact order Columbia university grants recognition to Law Students Against Antisemitism IHRA definition of anti-Semitism List of universities that have adopted the Kalven Report Indiana University art exhibit story Indiana University professor suspended for improper reservation Iowa Satanism bill Shurtleff v. Boston (2022) "So to Speak": Substack Transcript

J Hopkins is an American playwright, novelist, and political satirist. He moved to Germany in 2004. He publishes a self-titled blog on Substack and is the editor of Consent Factory Publishing. CJ's most recent book, "The Rise of the New Normal Reich," draws a parallel between Nazi Germany and the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In August 2022, it was banned on Amazon in Germany, Austria, and the Netherlands. In the months that followed, CJ was charged by German authorities with violating a section of the German penal code that prohibits "disseminating information, the intention of which is to further the aims of a former National-Socialist organization [the Nazis]." He was recently acquitted, but the prosecutor chose to appeal the decision. In the coming months, CJ will stand trial — again — for a crime he claims he didn't commit and for which he has already been acquitted. **We are launching on Substack this week! Nothing will change for our listeners. It's just another way to support the podcast and FIRE. Premium subscribers will receive a FIRE membership and access to our new monthly "Members Only" Zoom chats, where we will discuss free speech news and happenings at FIRE. Members will also be able to ask Nico and other FIRE staffers questions.** Timestamps 0:00 Introduction 2:58 Who is CJ Hopkins? 9:35 CJ moves to Germany 15:02 CJ's work since 2004 18:23 Berlin in 2020 27:18 "The Rise of the New Normal Reich" 34:01 CJ's book banned in Germany, Austria, and the Netherlands 37:05 German investigation 47:26 German sensitivities to Nazism 50:17 Why didn't CJ just pay the fine? 54:03 CJ goes to trial 1:03:29 Double-jeopardy / prosecutorial appeal 1:08:49 Does CJ have regrets? 1:12:50 Conclusion Show Notes Atlantic profile by Jamie Kirchick "Berlin Diary" by William L. Shirer "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" by William L. Shirer "The Rise of the New Normal Reich" by CJ Hopkins Consent Factory "The Verdict" by CJ Hopkins, a Substack article about the conclusion of his first trial "The Rise of the New Normal Reich: Consent Factory Essays, Vol. III, banned in Germany, Austria, and The Netherlands!" by CJ Hopkins, a Substack article about his book being banned on Amazon Transcript

Michael Malice is a self-described "anarchist without adjectives" and is the author of several books, including most recently "The White Pill: A Tale of Good and Evil." He is also the host of the podcast, "YOUR WELCOME," and the subject of the biographical comic book, "Ego & Hubris: The Michael Malice Story." Michael joins us today to explain why he hates the term "free speech," and gives his thoughts on McCarthyism, anarchism, Twitter, and more. Timestamps 0:00 Introduction 0:46 Who is Michael Malice? 6:45 What is an anarchist without adjectives? 7:26 The definition of anarchism/prominent anarchists 8:01 How do we have free speech in an anarchist society? 16:54 The McCarthy Era 20:38 Students for Justice in Palestine 24:57 Should we advocate for a culture of free speech? 30:44 "Hitman" 34:01 What is the core right under an anarchist system? 36:26 Elon, Twitter, and free speech 44:38 Emma Goldman and McCarthyism 55:27 Cancel culture 1:01:37 From Emma Goldman to Solzhenitsyn 1:05:31 What is it like to live under an authoritarian regime? 1:12:23 The war in Ukraine 1:15:24 Outro Show Notes "Dear Reader: The Unauthorized Autobiography of Kim Jong Il" by Michael Malice "Hitman: A Technical Manual for Independent Contractors" by Rex Feral (pseud.) "Khrushchev's Secret Speech" (Encyclopedia Britannica entry) "My Disillusionment in Russia" by Emma Goldman "Schenck v United States" (1919) "The Anarchist Handbook" by Michael Malice "The Gulag Archipelago" by Alexandr Solzhenitsyn "The New Right: A Journey to the Fringe of American Politics" by Michael Malice Episode Transcript

Jeff Kosseff is an associate professor of cybersecurity law in the United States Naval Academy's Cyber Science Department. He is the author of four books including his most recent, "Liar in a Crowded Theater: Freedom of Speech in a World of Misinformation." He has also written books about anonymous speech and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Timestamps 0:00 Introduction 2:30 Jeff's focus on the First Amendment 4:27 What is Section 230? 9:30 "Liar in a Crowded Theater" 16:27 What does the First Amendment say about lies? 19:35 What speech isn't protected? 21:27 The Eminem case 27:33 The Dominion lawsuit 38:44 "The United States of Anonymous" 46:39 The impact of age verification laws 49:43 "The Twenty-Six Words that Created the Internet" 58:40 What's next for Jeff? 1:01:35 Outro Show Notes Podcast Transcript Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association (2011) FIRE's guide to Section 230 Nikki Haley on social media anonymity Schenck v. United States (1917) "The Twenty-Six Words That Created the Internet" by Jeff Kosseff NBC News: "Judge allows lawsuit against Snap from relatives of dead children to move forward" "The United States of Anonymous: How the First Amendment Shaped Online Speech" by Jeff Kosseff United States v. Alvarez (2012) Transcript

Bill Courtney is an American football coach, entrepreneur, author, and the subject of the academy award winning 2011 documentary "Undefeated," which tells the story of Courtney leading a high school football team in an economically depressed area of Memphis, Tenn. to the playoffs. Courtney is the host of the An Army of Normal Folks podcast, in which he shares stories of "ordinary people doing extraordinary things in and around their communities." His book "Against the Grain: A Coach's Wisdom on Character, Faith, Family, and Love" was released in 2014. In this episode, we discuss coaching, the surprise success of "Undefeated," and how talking across lines of difference can heal a polarized America. Chapters: 0:00 Introduction 2:25 Courtney's background 5:41 The influence of coaches 16:50 How Courtney ended up at Manassas High School 18:50 Coaching in difficult environments 24:30 Bridging divides 30:12 Forgiveness and grace 35:57 Daryl Davis 42:45 The "death spiral" of division and polarization 53:15 What happened to Manassas after Courtney left? 54:00 How did the filmmakers find Manassas? 59:21 Was the documentary good for the school and the kids? Show Transcript

We're joined today by Elizabeth Nolan Brown, Robert Corn-Revere, and Ronnie London to discuss the history and verdict of the Backpage trial. Backpage.com was an online classified advertising service founded in 2004. As a chief competitor to Craigslist, Backpage allowed users to post ads to categories such as personals, automotive, rentals, jobs and — most notably — adult services. In 2018, the website domain was seized by the FBI and its executives were prosecuted under federal prostitution and money laundering statutes. The trial concluded this year, resulting in the acquittal and convictions of several key executives. Some First Amendment advocates are concerned that the Backpage case represents a "slippery slope" for the prosecution of protected speech and the rights of websites that host user-generated content. Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason Magazine, where she has written about the Backpage case in detail. Robert Corn-Revere is FIRE's chief counsel and a frequent guest of the show. Prior to joining FIRE, he represented Backpage in private practice. Ronnie London is FIRE's general counsel and another frequent guest of the show. He also represented Backpage when he was in private practice prior to joining FIRE. Timestamps 00:00 Introduction 06:55 The origins of Backpage 10:40 The significance of classified ads 14:52 Are escort ads protected? 19:07 Federal memos indicating Backpage fought child sex trafficking 23:19 Backpage content moderation 34:44 Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act 42:59 "De-banking" and NRA v. Vullo 52:24 The verdict 1:00:34 Could these convictions be overturned? 1:02:49 Outro Show notes Backpage.com url 2018 Backpage indictment Elizabeth Nolan Brown's 2018 Backpage profile Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act NRA v. Vullo The Travel Act

Nico and FIRE President & CEO Greg Lukianoff appeared on an X Space to discuss the fallout from the recent congressional hearing on anti-Semitism involving Harvard President Claudine Gay, MIT President Sally Kornbluth, and former Penn President Liz Magill, who resigned last week following backlash over her testimony. Timestamps 0:00- Introduction 1:53 - History of FIRE 5:40 - MIT/Harvard/Penn presidents' testimony 11:35 - How speech codes are abused and conflict over the definition of genocide 14:05 - Penn "water buffalo" incident 16:20 - Will universities take the wrong lesson from these hearings? 21:25 - Double standards on campus 23:41 - Standards for hostile environment harassment, Title VI 26:43 - Is there a university that is currently handling the situation well? 31:19 - Institutional neutrality 38:29 - Guidance for donors 41:51 - The mission of the university 47:35 - College admissions and political litmus tests 51:20 - Faculty viewpoint diversity 57:17 - The path forward Show notes Show Transcript The Canceling of the American Mind Congressional hearing FIRE's College Free Speech Rankings Kalven Report "Mighty Ira" Richard Berthold ("anyone who can blow up the pentagon has my vote") Student arrested for true threats at Cornell Skokie case (neo Nazi protest in Illinois) The Eternally Radical Idea (Greg's Substack) Penn "water buffalo" case

We're joined by First Amendment attorney Marc Randazza and British journalist Brendan O'Neill to discuss the state of free speech in the United States and Europe. Randazza is a First Amendment attorney and the managing partner at Randazza Legal Group. He has represented controversial figures throughout his career, including Alex Jones, Mike Cernovich, Chuck Johnson, and founder of the neo-nazi website the Daily Stormer, Andrew Anglin. O'Neill is a British author and journalist who served as editor of Spiked from 2007 to September 2021 and is currently its chief political writer. His book, "Heretic's Manifesto," was released in June. He last appeared on the podcast on October 20, 2016. Timestamps 0:00 Introduction 6:35 Do lawyers want to defend their enemies any more? 13:00 The oldest form of intolerance 17:19 Israel/Hamas and double standards 32:28 Hate speech laws in Ireland 51:35 Censorship from internet intermediaries 52:33 Debanking and corporate censorship 55:36 PruneYard case 1:01:44 Social media and the internet 1:05:18 The Digital Services Act Show Notes Show Transcript Brendan O'Neill at Oxford Union EU Digital Services Act Proposed Irish hate speech bill PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins (1980)

The FIRE team gets together to discuss the October 7 attacks in Israel and the resulting censorship on college campuses in the United States. FIRE President and CEO Greg Lukianoff, Director of Campus Rights Advocacy Alex Morey, and General Counsel Ronnie London join host Nico Perrino for the conversation. ** We will conduct a listener survey starting Monday, Nov. 13. "So to Speak" listeners who subscribe to the show's email list will receive an email with a link to the survey. If you are not an email subscriber, you can subscribe at the bottom of sotospeakpodcast.com or by subscribing to the general FIRE email list at thefire.org and noting that you would also like to subscribe to the "So to Speak" list. We appreciate your feedback: It will help us improve the show! Timestamps 5:13 - October 7 attacks on Israel 6:04 - Greg's initial thoughts 14:58 - Alex's initial thoughts 20:29 - Protected vs. unprotected expression 28:11 - Statements from donors, students and faculty; double standards 40:49 - Institutional neutrality and the Kalven Report 51:01 - Combating Anti-Semitism, the Daryl Davis example 54:46 - Students for Justice in Palestine 1:01:48 - Tearing down posters Show Notes Transcript Harvard student group letter (The public-facing Google Doc that originally hosted the letter was deleted.) Bill Ackman letter to Harvard The Kalven Report Daryl Davis FIRE Letter to University of Florida President Ben Sasse re: Students for Justice in Palestine (after recording this episode, Brandeis University derecognized its campus chapter of SJP. Here is FIRE's letter to Brandeis). Ron DeSantis, Tim Scott, and Marco Rubio call to revoke student visas Trump Truth Social post calls for the expulsion of students who support Hamas

The Supreme Court handed down some big First Amendment victories last term. What lies ahead for the Court in the upcoming term? FIRE Chief Counsel Robert Corn-Revere and FIRE General Counsel Ronnie London join the show to discuss important First Amendment cases that will be heard during the Court's 2023-24 session. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 1:47 - Murthy v. Missouri (government jawboning) 14:40 - NRA v. Vullo (government jawboning) 25:49 - NetChoice cases (social media regulation) 46:39 - Social media blocking cases 56:15 - Vidal v. Elster (trademark registration) 1:05:17 - Gonzalez v. Trevino (First Amendment retaliation) Show Transcript: https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/so-speak-podcast-transcript-2023-24-supreme-court-preview Cases Discussed: Murthy v. Missouri (government jawboning) NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton (social media regulation) Moody v. NetChoice, LLC (social media regulation) O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier (social media blocking) Lindke v. Freed (social media blocking) Vidal v. Elster (trademark registration) Gonzalez v. Trevino (First Amendment retaliation) Nat'l. Rifle Ass'n. of Am. v. Vullo (government jawboning)

President, CEO, and general counsel of the Alliance Defending Freedom, Kristen Waggoner, joins us for a discussion on freedom of speech and religious liberty. ADF has played various roles in 74 U.S. Supreme Court victories and since 2011, has won cases before the Court 15 times. According to its website, "ADF is the world's largest legal organization committed to protecting religious freedom, free speech, marriage and family, parental rights, and the sanctity of life." ADF has litigated many high profile and controversial free speech cases, including the recent Supreme Court case involving a web designer who didn't want to be compelled to design websites for same-sex weddings. Before that, ADF litigated the 2018 Masterpiece Cakeshop case, which involved a cake designer who similarly didn't want to provide his services for same-sex weddings on religious grounds. After the initial conversation was recorded, The Washington Post and The New Yorker released articles critical of ADF. Nico and Kristen recorded an additional, brief conversation to address these articles. That is included at the end of the podcast. Transcript: https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/so-speak-podcast-transcript-are-cakes-speech-alliance-defending-freedoms-kristen Timestamps: 0:43 - Introduction 6:16 - Kristen's path to ADF 12:54 - ADF's international team 14:20 - Pavi Rasanen controversy 19:24 - What does it mean to be a ministry?/blasphemy laws 22:56 - ADF's Supreme Court cases 26:58 - 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis 28:56 - Public accommodation laws/Masterpiece Cakeshop 40:40 - Pre-enforcement challenges 42:50 - Facial challenges 47:32 - Test cases or fake cases? 49:44 - Yale incident 57:50 - Other campus shoutdowns 1:00:08 - L.M. v. Town of Middleborough 1:14:27 - Kristen addresses WaPo article 1:15:38 - Kristen addresses New Yorker article Related Articles/Podcasts: "Inside the tactics that won Christian vendors the right to reject gay weddings," Jon Swaine and Beth Reinhard (The Washington Post) "Are ADF's Cases 'Made Up'?" Lathan Watts (ADF, response to The Washington Post) "The next targets for the group that overturned Roe," David D. Kirkpatrick (The New Yorker) FIRE's response to Kristen Waggoner Yale incident FIRE's response to Anne Coulter Cornell incident FIRE's response to Ilya Shapiro Georgetown incident FIRE's response to Ian Haworth UAlbany incident "The Imperfect Plaintiffs" ("More Perfect" podcast with Julia Longoria) Cases Discussed: Dubash v. City of Houston (Animal rights activists lawsuit, 2023) Paivi Rasanen (Finnish lawmaker charged with incitement against gay people) 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis (2022) Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2017) Uzuebgunam v. Preczewski (2021) West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943) Wooley v. Maynard (1997) Plessy v. Ferguson (1986) L.M. v. Town of Middleborough (2023) www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

Writer and academic Yascha Mounk argues that a new set of ideas about race, gender, and sexual orientation have overtaken society, giving rise to a rigid focus on identity in our national debate. In his new book, "The Identity Trap: A Story of Ideas and Power in Our Time," Yascha seeks to take these ideas seriously, understand their origin, dissect their merits and failings, and offer a path forward to avoid what he calls "the identity trap." On today's show, Mounk previews his book and explains how the identity trap harms freedom of speech. Mounk is known for his work on the rise of populism and the crisis of liberal democracy. He is a professor of the practice of international affairs at Johns Hopkins University and the author of five books. He is also the founder of the digital magazine Persuasion, a contributing editor at The Atlantic, and a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. Transcript: https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/so-speak-podcast-transcript-identity-trap-yascha-mounk Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 1:35 - Origins of "the identity trap" 8:48 - What is "identity synthesis?" 12:26 - Is "cultural Marxism" a thing? / The intellectual history of identity synthesis 27:47 - Critical race theory 32:30 - Free speech culture 40:22 - Speech and violence 47:58 - The Law of Group Polarization 52:27 - How to escape the identity trap Discussed intellectuals: Derrick Bell Kimberlé Crenshaw Jacques Derrida Michel Foucault Christopher Rufo (Rufo's book, "America's Cultural Revolution," and Nico's review, "Christopher Rufo Became the Thing He Claims to Hate") Edward Said Jean-Paul Sartre Gayatri Spivak Cass Sunstein (article: "The Law of Group Polarization") www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

FIRE President and CEO Greg Lukianoff and FIRE General Counsel Ronnie London join the show to preview Greg's new co-authored book on cancel culture and to discuss recent free speech cases and headlines: Transcript: https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/so-speak-podcast-transcript-dont-tread-me-misgendering-cancel-culture-and-three "The Canceling of the American Mind," by Greg Lukianoff and Rikki Schlott (out Oct. 17) Colorado public school to allow student to display Gadsden flag patch — as long as nobody complains California library violates First Amendment, boots speakers for referring to transgender women as 'biological men' Police stage 'chilling' raid on Marion County newspaper, seizing computers, records and cellphones Federal judge: Texas Law Mandating Age Verification for Sexually Themed Sites Violates First Amendment (Court Also Strikes Down "Public Health Warning" for Porn Sites) Judge blocks Arkansas law requiring parental OK for minors to create social media accounts Federal judge bars Texas from enforcing book rating law www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

Harvey Silverglate is a criminal defense and civil liberties attorney. He is also the co-founder of FIRE. On today's show, Harvey defends the work of criminal defense attorneys, explaining why even guilty people must have the right to a robust legal defense. He also shares stories from his life, from growing up in Brooklyn to defending Vietnam War protesters to co-founding FIRE. Transcript www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

High school debate is considered an ideal extracurricular activity for aspiring lawyers, politicians, or anyone seeking to learn the tools of effective communication and persuasion. But a slew of recent reports argue that high school debate is being captured by political ideology, rendering certain arguments off-limits, some debate topics undebatable, and ad hominem attacks fair game. Debate judges disclose their judging paradigms by saying things like, "I will listen to conservative-leaning arguments, but be careful," or, "Before anything else, including being a debate judge, I am a Marxist-Leninist-Maoist. . . . I cannot check the revolutionary proletarian science at the door when I'm judging." Some debates even devolve into personal attacks, spurred on by judges who say they "will consider indictments of an opponent on the basis that they have done [or] said something racist, gendered, [or] -phobic in their personal behavior." On today's show, we're joined by two former high school debaters who are dismayed by these trends. James Fishback is the founder of Incubate Debate, which hosts free debate tournaments for students in Florida. Matthew Adelstein is a rising sophomore studying philosophy at the University of Michigan and publishes Bentham's Newsletter, a newsletter about utilitarianism. Show notes: Transcript of episode "Part I: At high school debates, debate is no longer allowed" by James Fishback "Part II: At high school debates, watch what you say" by James Fishback "How critical theory is radicalizing high school debate" by Maya Bodnick Nico's current reading list on critical theory: "Grand Hotel Abyss" by Stuart Jeffries and "America's Cultural Revolution" by Christopher F. Rufo www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

We review the Supreme Court's free speech cases during the 2022-23 term and speculate on what's in store for the next term. FIRE Vice President of Litigation Darpana Sheth guest hosts and is joined by FIRE Chief Counsel Robert Corn-Revere and FIRE General Counsel Ronnie London. This episode was recorded before a virtual live audience on July 20. Watch a video of the conversation. Transcript Cases discussed: 303 Creative v Elenis Counterman v. Colorado United States v. Hansen Twitter v. Taamneh Gonzales v. Google The Netchoice cases www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

In the last episode of the "So to Speak" podcast, we traced the dramatic story of free speech in the United States from colonial America to the abolitionists' campaign to abolish slavery. In this week's episode, we pick up where we left off and explore the complicated history and legacy of civil liberties during the American Civil War. Professor and author Joseph R. Fornieri and FIRE Chief Counsel Robert Corn-Revere join the show this week to unpack Abraham Lincoln's justifications for suspending civil liberties and the important lesson that, in war, civil liberties can be hard to uphold, and our rights can be difficult to defend. Show notes: Transcript "Fateful Lightning: A New History of the Civil War and Reconstruction" by Allen Guelzo "Lincoln's First Amendment Record" by Eve Errickson (The Lincoln Cottage) "The Fate of Liberty: Abraham Lincoln and Civil Liberties" by Mark E. Neeley, Jr. "All the Laws but One: Civil Liberties in Wartime" by William H. Rehnquist "Did Abraham Lincoln Exceed His Presidential Powers during the Civil War?" (The Bill of Rights Institute) "Lincoln and Civil Liberties" (The Gilder-Lehrman Institute) Join FIRE on July 20th at 3:00 PM EST for a special live-streamed episode of the "So to Speak" podcast about the Supreme Court's free speech decisions from this past term. Hear from FIRE's Darpana Sheth, Bob Corn-Revere, and Ronnie London on what these decisions mean for free expression, (and maybe even for you), and ask the panel anywhatever burning questions you may have. You can register here. www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/SotoSpeakTheFreeSpeechPodcast Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

Last Constitution Day, we traced the origins of free speech in the United States from colonial America to the ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791. In this episode, we jump forward to the antebellum period, where abolitionists such as Frederick Douglass, John Quincy Adams, William Lloyd Garrison, and Angelina Grimké clashed with pro-slavery advocates over the monumental issue of slavery. Journalist and author Damon Root, FIRE Senior Fellow Jacob Mchangama, and Washington and Lee University professor Lucas Morel join the show this week to explore how free speech and the free press became the essential tools in the abolitionists' campaign for freedom. Show notes: Transcript "Free Speech: A History from Socrates to Social Media" by Jacob Mchangama "Glorious Liberty: Frederick Douglass and the Fight for an Anti-Slavery Constitution" by Damon Root "Speaking the Truth" by Lucas Morel (Persuasion) "A Plea for Free Speech in Boston" by Federick Douglass (National Constitution Center) "Frederick Douglass" (The First Amendment Encyclopedia) "What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?" by Frederick Douglass (Teaching American History) "With the Freedom of Speech, the Responsibility to Listen" (Ford Foundation) www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/SotoSpeakTheFreeSpeechPodcast Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

Nico knows very little about punk rock. On today's show, Reason magazine's Nick Gillespie and FIRE Vice President of Communications Matt Harwood do their best to explain to Nico why he and other free speech advocates should care about punk rock. Transcript: https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/so-speak-podcast-transcript-why-should-we-care-about-punk-rock www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

Winning in the court of public opinion is hard. On today's show, Ewing School founder Bob Ewing shares communications strategies that anyone — including free speech advocates — can use to win in the marketplace of ideas. Prior to founding the Ewing School, Bob was director of communications for the Institute for Justice and pioneered a communications training program for the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. Bob is also the author of the Talking Big Ideas Substack, which Nico highly recommends. Bob first shared his ideas on effective communication with host Nico Perrino over lunch in May 2013. Some of those ideas went on to shape FIRE's communications strategy for the next decade. Transcript: https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/so-speak-podcast-transcript-how-make-winning-free-speech-argument www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

On April 18, Fox News agreed to pay Dominion Voting Systems $787.5 million to settle a defamation lawsuit stemming from allegations of voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election. The historic settlement came just before the trial was set to begin in a case many saw as having significant First Amendment implications. In this exclusive conversation, attorneys for Fox and Dominion join First Amendment attorney Lee Levine to reflect on what led to the case, its outcome, and the arguments they would have made had the case gone to trial. Tom Clare is a founding partner of Clare Locke LLP and was counsel to Dominion. Dan Webb is co-executive chairman of Winston & Strawn and was counsel for Fox News. The conversation was organized and presented by The First Amendment Salon on Tuesday, May 9. Show notes: Transcript Video of the conversation www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

Rocking their tuxedos in preparation for the 2023 FIRE gala in New York City, Host Nico Perrino speaks with rapper and free speech advocate Killer Mike about his journey toward learning the value of free expression. They also discuss the importance of free speech in American history, the value of engaging and arguing with those who disagree with us, why free speech was critical to gaining racial equality, defending rappers and artists being prosecuted for their lyrics, and why polarization is more dangerous than anything anybody can say. The interview is followed by Killer Mike's keynote speech. Watch Killer Mike's keynote speech at the 2023 FIRE Gala in New York City: https://youtu.be/OBuXYtmQ8mw www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

Does music censorship still happen in America? Is "sex, drugs, and rock 'n' roll" dead? Is transgression in art and culture celebrated anymore (or was it ever)? From Beyonce and Taylor Swift to Ozzy Osbourne and Robin Thicke, SPIN magazine founder Bob Guccione Jr. and Reason magazine Editor at Large Nick Gillespie join a lively discussion of our current moment in pop culture. Bob also shares some war stories from his fight against the Parents Music Resource Center in the 1980s. Transcript: https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/so-speak-podcast-transcript-sex-drugs-and-free-speech www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

What's going on in Florida? Host Nico Perrino and his FIRE colleagues break down the latest efforts to censor speech in the Sunshine State. Show notes: Transcript "VICTORY: After FIRE lawsuit, court halts enforcement of key provisions of the Stop WOKE Act limiting how Florida professors can teach about race, sex" "Thought the 'Stop WOKE Act' was bad? A new Florida bill is worse" "Unconstitutional and un-American, Senate Bill 1316 would force bloggers who criticize the government to register with the state" "Florida bill attacking NYT v. Sullivan would 'spell disaster' for free speech" Miami Herald: "Florida undercover agents reported no 'lewd acts' at drag show targeted by DeSantis" by Nicholas Nehamas and Ana Ceballos www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

UPDATE: Just as this podcast was to be published, Stanford Law School Dean Jenny Martinez sent a 10-page memorandum to the law school community outlining a path forward for the school, including updating school policies to prevent future speaker disruptions and mandatory student free speech training. She also announced that Associate Dean Tirien Steinbach is on leave. – The heckling began almost as soon as Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Kyle Duncan started his invited lecture at Stanford Law School on March 9. Signs in the audience read "RESPECT TRANS RIGHTS," "FEDSUCK," "BE PRONOUN NOT PRO-BIGOT." What transpired over the next 40 minutes captured national headlines and raised questions about the state of free speech at America's law schools. David Lat writes commentary about law and the legal profession for Original Jurisdiction. Until 2019, he was an editor at the legal news website Above the Law, which he founded. Prior to his journalism career, David was a practicing lawyer. Show notes: Transcript "Yale Law is no longer #1 for free speech debacles" by David Lat "7 updates on Judge Kyle Duncan and Stanford Law" by David Lat "The full audio recording of Judge Kyle Duncan at Stanford Law" by David Lat Transcript of Stanford administrator Dean Tirien Steinbach's remarks on March 9 at event featuring Fifth Circuit Judge Kyle Duncan Email to Stanford Law School from Dean Jenny Martinez Stanford apology letter to Judge Kyle Duncan Flyers protesting Stanford law event "​​Shouting down speakers is mob censorship" by Nadine Strossen and Greg Lukianoff Kalven Committee: Report on the university's role in political and social action (University of Chicago report) www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

Ilya Shapiro joins the show to discuss the fireworks in the Fox/Dominion defamation lawsuit, his recent speaking appearance at the University of Denver, and his "cancel culture nightmare" at Georgetown University. Shapiro is a senior fellow and director of constitutional studies at the Manhattan Institute. He previously (and briefly) served as executive director and senior lecturer at the Georgetown Center for the Constitution and as a vice president at the Cato Institute. Shapiro will speak at FIRE's gala celebration in NYC on April 18. Reserve your tickets now at this link. Show notes: Transcript "My cancel culture nightmare is over" by Ilya Shapiro "Ilya Shapiro resigns from Georgetown following reinstatement after 122-day investigation of tweets" (featuring Ilya's resignation letter) Ilya's Substack, Shapiro's Gavel "Why the mental health of liberal girls sank first and fastest" by Jonathan Haidt www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

The seminal 1964 Supreme Court decision in New York Times v. Sullivan limited the ability of public officials to silence their critics by successfully suing them for defamation. Sullivan made "American public officials more accountable, the American media more watchful, and the American people better informed," said William Rehnquist, the late Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. But Sullivan is increasingly under attack from politicians, activists, and even sitting Justices of the Supreme Court. They believe the decision went too far, enabling the news media and others to defame others with little-to-no consequence. On today's show, we are joined by lawyers Floyd Abrams (Cahill Gordon & Reindel), JT Morris (FIRE), and Matthew Schafer (Fordham Law) to discuss New York Times v. Sullivan and its future. Show notes: Transcript New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964) "Two Justices Say Supreme Court Should Reconsider Landmark Libel Decision" by Adam Liptak "How to Restore Balance to Libel Law" by Glenn Reynolds Florida HB 991, the anti-Sullivan bill Matthew Schafer's tweet thread on Florida's HB 991 "New York Times v. Sullivan and the Forgotten Session of the US Supreme Court" by Matthew Schafer "The Most Important Supreme Court Precedent for Freedom of the Press Is in Jeopardy" by Matthew Schafer and Jeff Kosseff www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

FIRE's Will Creeley and Aaron Terr join the show to discuss Phoenix, Arizona's unconstitutional "clean zone" for Super Bowl LVII, Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot's effort to get public school students to volunteer for her re-election campaign, recent polling on how much people really know about the First Amendment (sadly, not much), and Indiegogo, Kickstarter, and Crowdfundr canceling fundraisers for comic books they deemed politically unacceptable. We also provide an update on the Hamline University Muhammad art censorship case. Show notes: Transcript "Phoenix ordinance restricting signs during Super Bowl is offsides on the First Amendment" "Here's why Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot can't ask teachers to help her reelection campaign" "Indie-no-go: Popular crowdfunding sites cancel fundraisers for comic books about gender identity and the U.S.-Mexico border" "Do Americans know their rights? Survey says: No." "Hamline Faculty vote 71-12 to urge president to step down after academic freedom scandal" www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

What does the rise of artificial intelligence mean for the future of free speech and the First Amendment? Who is liable for what AI produces? Can you own a copyright for works produced by AI? Does AI itself violate intellectual property rights when it uses others' information to generate content? What about that Morgan Freeman "deep fake"? And is ChatGPT going to make all of our jobs irrelevant? Show notes: Transcript Guests: Eugene Volokh, professor at UCLA School of Law David Greene, senior staff attorney and civil liberties director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation Alison Schary, partner at Davis Wright Tremaine www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

A faculty member at Hamline University lost her job. Twelve staffers at the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo were murdered. And Salman Rushdie was repeatedly stabbed. All of them offended certain people's religious sensitivities. On today's show, we are joined by Amna Khalid and Michael Moynihan to discuss the risks and costs of teaching, talking, writing, and creating art about religion, particularly Islam. We also discuss the recent #TwitterFiles reporting. Amna Khalid is an associate professor of history at Carleton College and host of the podcast "Banished." Michael Moynihan is a writer, reporter, and co-host of "The Fifth Column" podcast. Show notes: Transcript New York Times: "A Lecturer Showed a Painting of the Prophet Muhammad. She Lost Her Job." by Vimal Patel The offending image "Most of All, I Am Offended as a Muslim" by Amna Khalid "Hamline Student Newspaper (the Oracle) Removed Published Defense of Lecturer Who Showed Painting of Muhammad" by Eugene Volokh "We must stand up to Iran's threats to free speech" by FIRE's Sarah McLaughlin (reflecting on the anniversary of the Charlie Hebdo attacks) "Capsule Summaries of all Twitter Files Threads to Date, With Links and a Glossary" by Matt Taibbi www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

Do Ann Coulter's words equal "violence"? Does Emerson College care more about not offending the Chinese Communist Party than protecting student free speech rights? And are faculty political litmus tests back in vogue? FIRE's Alex Morey and Zach Greenberg join the show to discuss the latest in campus censorship. Please support this show by donating to FIRE before the end of the year: thefire.org/support Show notes: Transcript "San Diego State University: University senate adopts policy imposing DEI requirement in reappointment, tenure, and promotion review process" "University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Faculty up for promotion and tenure must submit diversity, equity, and inclusion statements, affirm university views" "'Your words are violence!' Cornell students shout down Ann Coulter in latest heckler's veto to roil campuses this semester" by Amanda Nordstrom "Penn State defends canceling controversial event over 'threats of violence,' as police stood by during assaults on students" by Aaron Corpora "UC Davis feces-flingers lose their shit over movie screening" by James Jordan "Emerson still 'kinda sus' on free speech — so we've alerted their accreditor" by Graham Piro "Arrest of student in Boston a grim reminder of the danger facing Chinese dissidents on campus" by Sarah McLaughlin "Tennessee Tech still investigating, enforcing event ban on LGBTQ+ and theater groups that hosted drag show" by Amanda Nordstrom "Federal court distorts First Amendment, upholds Tennessee Tech's punishment of professors for 'Game of Thrones' parody flyers" by Zach Greenberg www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@freespeechtalk Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

Hot on the heels of oral argument in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, FIRE's Ronnie London and David Hudson join the show to discuss the case, as well as other high profile free speech cases at the Supreme Court this year. Show notes: Transcript Watch the video of the podcast conversation 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis Shurtleff v. City of Boston Kennedy v. Bremerton School District Gonzalez v. Google LLC Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/thefireorg Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

FIRE's new Director of Public Advocacy Aaron Terr and the Cato Institute's Will Duffield join the show to discuss a slew of recent free speech news. California gets it right on rap lyrics but wrong on coronavirus misinformation. One Texas school district repeatedly ventures into book banning. LeBron James spreads "hate speech" misinformation. Is government "jawboning" censorship? And, yes, Elon Musk . . . again. Show notes: Transcript Watch the video of the podcast conversation "VICTORY: After FIRE lawsuit, court halts enforcement of key provisions of the Stop WOKE Act limiting how Florida professors can teach about race, sex" "Jawboning against Speech: How Government Bullying Shapes the Rules of Social Media," by Will Duffield "Fact Sheet: Texas School District Bans 'Gender Fluidity' from Library Shelves" "California Restricts Use of Rap Lyrics in Criminal Trials After Gov. Newsom Signs Bill," "The ACLU Says California's Ban on COVID-19 'Misinformation' From Doctors Is Gratuitous and Unconstitutional," LeBron James, via Twitter: "So many damn unfit people saying hate speech is free speech." "Markey fires back after Musk mocks his Twitter complaint" "Biden asked whether Elon Musk is 'threat' to national security, says relationships 'worth being looked at'" www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/thefireorg Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]

FIRE's Will Creeley and Aaron Terr join the show to discuss a slew of recent free speech news: What do we make of Elon Musk buying Twitter? Is PayPal fining its users $2,500 for promoting "misinformation"? Is New York trying to destroy Twitch? And do public employees in Charlottesville, Va., need to shut their mouths to keep their jobs? Also, how's FIRE's off-campus expansion going? Show notes: Transcript Open letter to Elon Musk from Greg Lukianoff on preserving free expression on social media "Elon Musk's business ties deserve more scrutiny" by Matt Yglesias "Welcome to geriatric social media" by Charlie Warzel "Silicon Values: The future of free speech under surveillance capitalism" by Jillian C. York "PayPal is no pal to free expression" by Aaron Terr "Did PayPal reverse course on proposed speech-chilling policies?" by Aaron Terr "Did PayPal quietly bring back its financial penalty for spreading 'misinformation'?" by Aaron Terr "The Internet Is Not Facebook: Why Infrastructure Providers Should Stay Out of Content Policing" by Corynne McSherry and Jillian C. York New York attorney general report on the Buffalo shooting, social media, and livestreaming "City's new policy wrongly muzzles employees" by Will Creeley www.sotospeakpodcast.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/SotoSpeakTheFreeSpeechPodcast Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/freespeechtalk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sotospeakpodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/freespeechtalk/ Email us: [email protected]