Let's Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal

Summary“PCCP is a great tool for your regulatory strategy but it is not for every company or for every change”. PCCP (Predetermined Change Control Plan) is a new regulatory scheme that allows device manufacturers to implement post-market changes without requiring pre-market submission to the FDA. In this episode, Yu Zhao explains how the PCCP tool offer… This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“It is not just about protecting your data. It is also about protecting safety of a medical device.”In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Nidhi Gani highlights the important difference between data security and cybersecurity, especially for a life-saving medical device such as a pacemaker. As medical devices become more inter-connected, they are also increasingly vulnerable to cyberattacks. Managing the risk of these vulnerabilities is a key party of cybersecurity risk management of medical devices and healthcare systems they are a part of. Although the regulatory environment is changing rapidly, Nidhi encourages risk practitioners to apply the same basic principles of medical device safety to cybersecurity. A best practice is to apply the secure product development framework (SPDF) across the entire lifecycle of a medical device. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Nidhi Gani, which also includes an open discussion with a live audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:01:25 Introduction00:02:12 Why cybersecurity is important for medical devices 00:04:32 Medical devices today operate in a complex, connected environment00:05:22 The SPDF approach to medical device development for cybersecurity00:07:19 Current industry challenges in applying the SPDF approach00:09:28 Cybersecurity challenges in the post-market phase00:11:28 Exciting career opportunity for QA/RA professionals00:15:13 Audience Q&A and open discussion00:29:24 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.Suggested links:AAMI TR57:2016: Principles for medical device security - Risk management, Revised 2023. FDA: Cybersecurity webpage, Current as of March 2024. LTR: Cybersecurity is the next frontier in medical device risk management. LTR: Security risk assessment and vulnerability monitoring. About Nidhi GaniNidhi Gani is currently a Cybersecurity regulatory affairs consultant at MCRA and an adjunct professor at Northeastern University. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in Biotechnology and Master’s degrees in Microbiology and Regulatory Affairs in Drugs, Biologics, and Medical Devices. She also has a certification in Cybersecurity from Harvard University. She applies her extensive technical and regulatory experience to help develop innovative solutions for medical device clients in this rapidly evolving space. Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“Technology has changed, we need to move with the technology change.”In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Leo Eisner shares a brief history of IEC 60601, the comprehensive global safety standard for active medical devices, and the work currently ongoing on the 4th edition. He is leading the group currently working on the user-interface aspects, which includes information provided by the manufacturer, usability, alarm system and also user interfaces aspects. There are a total of 12 working groups involved in various aspects of the standard, each focusing on a source of harm or hazardous situation. Leo encourages risk practitioners in the industry to stay current with safety standards and consider taking an active role in the standards development process. This is a good way to be recognized as an industry expert and have an opportunity to shape the future direction of best practices. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Leo Eisner, the IEC 60601 Guy, which also includes an open discussion with a live audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:02:25 Introduction00:03:39 A brief overview and history of IEC 6060100:06:30 A quick update on the work currently ongoing on the 4th edition 00:10:30 Reference documents for the 4th edition project00:12:32 Why risk practitioners should get involved in standards development00:14:25 Audience Q&A and open discussion00:32:30 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.Suggested links:IEC: Architectural specification for safety standards of medical electrical equipment, medical electrical systems, and software used in healthcare, v 3.0. IEC: Design specification for the 4th edition of IEC 60601-1About Leonard (Leo) EisnerLeonard Eisner the “60601 Guy” is the Founder and Principal compliance/regulatory consultant at Eisner Safety Consultants. He has worked at 3 notified bodies and in the medical device industry for over 30 years. His career has spanned over 35 years of product safety certification test lab experience. He worked at 2 internationally recognized labs for 11 years. As an an expert in the standards development process, Leo has been staying at the forefront of evolving medical device standards for over 20 years with standards such as the IEC 60601 series, ISO 15223, ISO 20417 and other Working Group (WG), Maintenance Teams, and committees. He is an expert member of the development teams on IEC 60601-1, edition 3.2, and currently leading one of the WGs, an expert member of an another WG, and on the editing team (AG50) involved in the 4th edition of the standard.Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“Before making a decision, we have to look at the issues end-to-end. We have to consider how our actions will impact the customer.”In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Rajesh Kathuria emphasizes the need to consider the full impact of our actions on safety of customers and users and quality of performance. As an example, when working at the component level, we should consider the impact of any changes at the system level and how it could affect the safety of end user or the patient. Rajesh advises industry colleagues to take the emotions out, and rely on data as much as possible. If you don’t have good quality data, your first decision could be to take the time and gather more information, especially when the potential consequences of failure could be catastrophic. He also recommends to consider diverse viewpoints from a cross-functional experienced team as part of the decision making process. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Rajesh Kathuria which also includes an open discussion with a live audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:02:10 Introduction00:05:42 Considering risks in decision making00:08:25 An example of missing long-term factors in decision making00:10:09 Taking a systems approach to finding solutions 00:12:13 An example of a difficult decision to delay a project to ensure safety00:14:30 Difficult decisions require courage to do the right thing 00:16:30 Leadership advice for QA/RA professionals00:17:50 Audience Q&A and open discussion00:35:50 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.Suggested links:LTR podcast: Understanding risk-based thinkingLTR podcast: Getting comfortable with a probabilistic way of thinking about riskAbout Rajesh KathuriaRajesh Kathuria is a currently the Owner and Director at KMS Solutions, B.V, providing strategic consulting services in Quality and Regulatory for medical device companies. He is a seasoned leader with over 20 years of industry experience in senior leadership positions. He holds a Bachelors degree in Mechanical Engineering and Graduate degree in Management with specialization in International Marketing and Finance. He is also a certified ISO 13485 lead auditor and has extensive experience of auditing/working in various geographies and different global regulations. Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“There are 3 pillars I consider essential to defining a strategy for IVD risk management. What is the system definition, who are the user groups, and what is the level of novelty?”In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Claudia Campbell-Matland highlights the broad range of in-vitro diagnostic devices (IVD), which requires a strategic approach to their development and risk management. Claudia advises IVD manufacturers to consider their risk management strategy and scope under 3 pillars - the system definition, the target user groups and the level of complexity. A simple, home-based IVD requires a very different approach than a highly complex analytical system used as a companion diagnostics for highly sophisticated immunotherapies. She recommends taking some time to develop a business strategy first before jumping into product development and risk management activities. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Claudia Campbell-Matland, which also includes an open discussion with a live audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:01:33 Introduction00:03:03 Strategic questions to ask for IVD risk management00:05:10 3 pillars of IVD risk management strategy00:06:45 Example of a strategy for a simple point-of-care assay IVD00:08:31 Special considerations for home-based IVDs00:09:20 Leadership opportunity for QA/RA professionals in setting strategy00:10:15 Practical tips for assigning severity and probability for IVD risks00:12:51 Latest update on LDTs00:14:50 Audience Q&A and open discussion00:35:50 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.Suggested links:LTR podcast: Focus on intended use in the clinical environment for IVD risk managementLTR podcast: Risk management of IVDs requires a different approachAbout Claudia Campbell-MatlandClaudia Campbell-Matland is a consultant and managing member at CNCM Consulting LLC providing services to medical device and IVD manufacturers in product development, risk management, project management and strategy development. She has nearly 30 years of experience in the clinical space at various global organizations. She holds a Masters degree in Microbiology and Bachelors in Biology, as well as multiple certifications in auditing and project management. Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“To be able to see a virtual image over the real world - that augmented reality is - is a mind blowing, very different experience.”In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Phil Deming shares some of the unique human factors engineering challenges for an augmented reality (AR) technology for 3D visualization of human anatomy in real time during a medical procedure. Phil advises manufacturers to stay current with rapidly evolving new technologies, and talk to users in their intended environment to figure out how best to deploy a system so it does not interfere with their standard work flow. This is the essences of human factors engineering, which involves developing a solid understanding of how users interact with a system and minimizing risks at the user interface. He also shares some of the differences between usability engineering according to IEC 62366 and FDA guidance for human factors engineering. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Phil Deming, which also includes an open discussion with a live audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:01:40 Introduction00:02:30 Human factors engineering in medical industry vs. consumer electronics00:05:15 Introducing AR technology to visualize human anatomy in 3D space00:07:15 Human factors considerations for AR technology00:08:42 Considering use-related risks associated with AR technology00:10:05 Tackling new challenges in human factors emerging with technology00:11:35 Audience Q&A and general discussion00:30:52 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.Suggested links:Understanding risk-based thinkingMediView XR: OmnifyXR holographic display with real-time imaging and 3D anatomy visualization. FDA Guidance: Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Medical Devices, issued February 2016. IEC 62366-1:2015: Application of usability engineering to medical devices, issued 2015. LTR podcast: Treat human factors as a driver of customer satisfaction, not a check-the-box activity, August 2024. About Phil DemingPhil Deming III is a human factors engineer at MediView XR, Inc., a digital health company that leverages augmented reality, remote connectivity and spatial computing data to create revolutionary surgical navigation and tele-procedure platforms. He has over 20 years of usability and human factors, first in the consumer electronics, later transitioning into medical devices. He holds a Bachelors degree in Business Management, Marketing and related support services, and a certification in Automotive Engineering Technology. Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“It’s too often confused with risk management itself. Part of the risk-based approach is just the mindset, the thinking about risk, and then deciding ‘so what should we do?’, the answer to which might be a formal risk management.”In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Steve Gompertz clarifies a subtle difference between a risk-based approach and formal risk management according to standards such as ISO 14971. Risk-based approach is more about a mindset and a set of behaviors that lead to risk-based decisions, rather than application of specific risk management tools such as FMEAs. Steve advises manufacturers to consider adding a section in each procedure to describe a risk-based approach appropriate to that process. Another good practice is to create an alignment matrix to map differences in the risk-based approach to different processes of the quality system. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Steve Gompertz, which also includes an open discussion with a live audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:01:40 Introduction00:03:38 What is risk-based approach and why it is not the same as risk management00:06:22 How to practice and demonstrate a risk-based approach00:08:15 A practical way to document risk-based approach00:11:23 How auditors assess the practice of risk-based approach 00:13:41 Striking the right balance between documentation and operating culture00:17:38 Audience Q&A and general discussion00:32:57 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.Suggested links:Understanding risk-based thinkingRisk-based approach to building a QMS in a startupTips for applying a risk-based approach to auditing Quality SystemsAbout Steve GompertzSteve Gompertz is a Partner at QRx Partners, providing consulting services to medical device companies in quality system assessment, development and remediation, audit preparation, SOP and forms development, regulatory body response guidance and quality system education. He has over three decades of industry experience at many leading organizations including Medtronic, Boston Scientific and Canon. He is also a Senior Adjunct Instructor at St. Cloud University. Steve has a Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering, a mini-MBA certificate in Medical Technology, and multiple certifications including ASQ Manager of Quality/Organizational Excellence, Medical Device Auditor, EU-MDR auditor and MDSAP. Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“Don’t be comfortable saying, ‘Oh I follow the ISO (13485) to the letter’; it doesn’t matter. You have to comply with 21 CFR 820.”In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Neil Di Spirito, helps us understand the full legal context behind the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR), the amended version of 21 CFR 820 that will go into effect in February 2026. Although, the QMSR incorporates the International Standard ISO 13485:2016 by way of reference, there are points of differences and additional requirements for compliance to 21 CFR 820. That is why it is important to carefully consider gaps from the current QSR against the full scope of QMSR, not just ISO 13485 requirements. It is not simply a technical matter, but also a legal matter that manufacturers should consider evaluating with help from a legal expert. Neil advises manufacturers to consider operating two parallel processes right up to the exact date of QMSR enforcement, gain working experience to appropriately modify their approach for compliance. A good way to do this is through a Quality Plan. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Neil Di Spirito, which also includes an open discussion with a live audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:02:45 Introduction00:06:45 The legal basis of 21 CFR 820 modification to QMSR00:11:20 QMSR lowers the compliance burden by harmonization with ISO 1348500:15:59 Recommendations for manufacturers to prepare a transition to QMSR00:18:50 Audience Q&A and general discussion00:32:28 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.Suggested links:FDA: Frequently asked questions about QMSRLTR webinar: Getting ready for QMSRAbout Neil Di SpiritoNeil Di Spirito is the Principal at DiSpirito Law, PLLC, where he represents pharmaceutical, biologic and medical device companies in regulatory, commercial and FDA enforcement defense matters. He has 20+ years of industry experience in various roles including business management with P&L responsibility. He teaches introductory courses in pharmaceutical and medical device law to FDA new hires and industry legal professionals. He holds an MBA degree with specialization in Pharmaceutical Marketing and Management, and a Juris Doctor, Law degree. Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“There is a growing awareness that if you bring in Regulatory at the beginning of designing a product, you will end up with a more robust product. In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Christine Zomorodian highlights some of the barriers that have traditionally hindered good communication and collaboration between QA/RA and Engineering functions in MedTech. However, she also points out that there is reason to be optimistic about the future.Gender roles are changing, with more women entering Engineering and an increasing number of men choosing the QA/RA profession due to availability of graduate level academic programs. Company cultures are also adapting to big advances in compliance infrastructure technologies and the rapidly changing regulatory landscape. Together, these really underscore the importance of open communication and cross-functional collaboration.A good tool to foster collaboration is a Quality Plan, which continues to be under-utilized in our industry. But a Quality Plan can help your entire team come together to figure out how you could efficiently achieve a desired goal, whether it is a remediation project or developing a suitable quality system in a startup environment. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Christine Zomorodian, which also includes an open discussion with a live audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:01:59 Introduction00:05:06 An example of impact of poor cross-functional collaboration00:08:36 Traditional barriers to cross-functional collaboration in MedTech00:12:05 Optimistic trends helping to improve communication and collaboration00:14:00 Audience Q&A and general discussion00:29:00 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.Suggested links:Tips for improving collaboration in risk managementCollaboration is the secret sauce for success in risk managementAbout Christine ZomorodianChristine Zomorodian is the Founder and Managing Consultant at Gish Consulting, LLC, advising MedTech companies in regulatory strategy, quality assurance, regulatory affairs and engineering process improvement. She also serves as a Person Responsible for Regulatory Compliance (PRRC) for EU-MDR compliance, and a guest lecturer at University of Washington. She has over 25 years of industry experience in various QA/RA roles at multiple global medical device companies. She holds a B.A. degree in International Affairs with concentration in Biology and Communication, and a M.S. degree in Biomedical Regulatory Affairs. Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“There is a tendency for human factors to be very closely tied to regulatory requirements and nothing else, but human factors as a core discipline is about user-centered design.”In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Korey Johnson highlights how the current practice of human factors engineering in the medical device industry is mainly driven by regulatory requirements, which often leads to a check-the-box approach and nothing more.But human factors is more about applying a user-centered design philosophy starting from early feasibility and throughout the product development process.“Are we designing the right thing, and how do we design the thing right to be able to used well by people, not just safe and effective, but does it drive satisfaction?” When viewed as a driver of customer/satisfaction, a user-centered design approach can deliver a sustainable competitive advantage. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Korey Johnson, which also includes an open discussion with a live audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:01:47 Introduction00:04:25 Regulatory emphasis on human factors in medical devices00:06:45 Barriers to implementing user centered design philosophy 00:08:20 Connecting with risk management and design controls00:10:15 Assessing impact of changes in software, AI/ML enabled devices00:14:30 Why human factors must be integrated throughout product development00:16:50 Audience Q&A and general discussion00:37:30 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.Suggested links:AI and UX: Why artificial intelligence needs user experience, Published 2020.FDA: Applying human factors and usability engineering to medical devices, Published February 2016.ISO: IEC 62366-1:2015; Application of usability engineering to medical devices, Published 2015. About Korey JohnsonKorey Johnson is the Managing Partner at Bold Insight, a leading research and consulting agency providing services in UX research, usability testing and human factors engineering. With over 25 years of industry experience, Korey is passionate about transforming the practice of human factors engineering in medical devices through empowerment, creativity and collaboration. He holds a B.S. degree in Psychology and an M.S. in Human Factors Psychology. Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“There is a very strong push (in the EU) to look at threshold values and acceptance criteria in the clinical evaluation, and these acceptance criteria for benefit risk have to be based on the state of the art.”State of the art (SoTA) is a very important topic in the medical device industry, because it is directly connected to risk acceptability and benefit-risk evaluation, which in turn, is directly tied to safety and effectiveness for regulatory purposes. But what is SoTA and how do you define it for your medical device? In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Chris Whelan helps us understand the nuances of SoTA and encourages us to consider both the engineering and clinical aspects of SoTA for our devices. Also, remember that it is an iterative process and you may have to review SoTA throughout the development process and even after product launch in the post-market process. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Chris Whelan, which also includes an open discussion with a live audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:02:00 Introduction00:03:26 Definition of State of the art (SoTA)00:04:57 Understanding SoTA in the context of intended use and standards00:06:17 Two aspects of SoTA - engineering and clinical state of the art00:06:53 How to define the SoTA for your product00:10:20 When to start defining SoTA during product development00:11:51 Does clinical SoTA depend on standard of care in different markets?00:14:13 Audience Q&A and general discussion00:31:25 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.Suggested links:LTR Podcast: Clinical evaluation is a lifecycle process, not a one-time activityFDA Guidance: Appropriate use of voluntary consensus standardsACHIEVE: Risk management fundamentals on-demand training which covers 25 key terms and basic concepts, including state of the art, for medical devices. About Chris WhelanChris Whelan is currently the New Product Development Manager at ITL BioMedical where he leads multiple global engineering teams. He has nearly 20 years of industry experience in medical device design, engineering and project management, as well as teaching experience at a university. Other areas of expertise include design controls, usability engineering and risk management. He holds a B.S. in Industrial Design from the University of Technology, Sydney, Australia. Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“You can get a lot of valuable insights from the FDA on what your regulatory pathway is when it comes to risk, and how that impacts not only the risk of the product but how you set up your quality systems and what you need to implement in the long run. ”In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Amit Guruprasad shares how small medical device manufacturers and startups can take advantage of the free pre-sub program to get early feedback from the FDA to inform their regulatory strategy and plans for collecting data to prove safety and effectiveness in their final regulatory submission. But it requires a strategic approach and preparation before you meet with the FDA. As an example, you should plan to get FDA feedback on your proposed approach and not seek yes/no answers. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Amit Guruprasad, which also includes an open discussion with a live audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:02:12 Introduction00:04:20 FDA’s Q-Sub program, pre-submissions and risk determination00:07:11 How to prepare for a pre-sub meeting with the FDA00:10:05 Develop a strategic plan for pre-sub meetings with FDA00:12:05 Plan to get feedback on the approach and not answers to yes/no questions00:12:50 Lessons learned from a recent pre-sub meeting00:14:25 Audience Q&A and general discussion00:31:25 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.Suggested links:The Q-Submission Program: FDA guidance for requesting a meeting for feedback on medical device submissions. DICE: FDA’s division of industry and consumer education.LTR webinar on post-market surveillanceAbout Amit GuruprasadAmit Guruprasad is the founder of Devan MedTech Solutions, where he provides quality and regulatory consulting services to medical device companies and startups. He has over 10 years of professional experience in R&D, quality and regulatory affairs at various medical device companies. He holds B.S. and M.S. in Biomedical Engineering. Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“The reality is that, today, a lot of people are studying medicine to go into industry. But if your curriculum do not include areas like risk management, cross-functional collaboration, dFMEA and all of that, then transition for that position is going to be slower.”In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Dr. Juan Daccach shares his personal journey of transitioning into a medical safety role in MedTech as a practicing orthopedic joint reconstruction surgeon. He advises clinicians aspiring to transition into a Medical Safety role to proactively bridge gaps in their medical training and experience for success.As an example, clinicians are trained to focus on the worst case and minimizing its impact on an individual patient. Managing risks of a medical device, on the other hand, is not just about the worst case scenario. It is about striking a positive balance between benefit and risk. There is no quality without safety, and there is no safety without quality. That is why broadening your view of a medical device, how it is developed and what it takes to bring it to market, is important for success. There is a need to include these topics into medical curriculum and continuing education. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Dr. Juan Daccach, which also includes an open discussion with a live audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:02:11 Introduction00:08:32 Overcoming challenges when transitioning as a clinician into MedTech00:12:18 Learning to speak the language of Quality and Regulatory00:15:00 Challenges in integrating Medical Safety with QA/RA function00:18:11 Audience Q&A and general discussion00:31:25 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.Suggested links:Fundamentals of Risk Management: An introductory on-demand course for medical device risk management on ACHIEVE. About Dr. Juan Daccach, MDJuan Dacach, MD is currently the Vice President of Product Safety at Metz Aesthetics. Previously he was in various leadership positions in Medical Safety and Medical Affairs at various leading MedTech companies. He specialized in Orthopedics and trauma during his medical training, residency and fellowship as an MD. As part of his continuing education in the industry, he also acquired certifications in quality, auditing, coaching and leadership communication. Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“Show me the indicators, show me the KPIs and I will show you the results.”Resiliency starts at the top. Misaligned incentives often lead to unintended and disastrous consequences. Recently, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in the US grounded 171 Boeing 737-9 MAX planes following a mid-air incident where a cabin door blew open, exposing hundreds of passengers to a serious hazardous condition. The issue was traced to gaps in quality and inspection of components from suppliers. Similar to the aviation industry, supply chains in the medical device industry are also complex and fragmented. In this conversation, Marco Felsberger emphasizes the need for focusing on supply chain resiliency, and not just managing individual suppliers. He encourages us to consider a systems view to understand various interactions and constraints, and simulate scenarios to identify potential vulnerabilities. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Marco Felsberger, which also includes an open discussion with a live audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:02:15 Introduction00:04:35 Why supply chain resiliency is critical in a complex world00:06:40 How misaligned incentives create supply chain vulnerabilities00:10:10 What we can learn from the automotive industry00:12:33 Applying systems thinking to improve supply chain resiliency00:17:01 Audience Q&A and general discussion00:31:25 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.Suggested links:On the Edge of Resilience: Marco’s Substack publicationAbout Marco FelsbergerMarco Felsberger is a resilience and risk manager with over 20 years of experience across diverse industries including banking and consumer products. He is currently a Senior Advisor of Supply Chain Resilience at Prewave, specializing in risk and resilience management, business continuity strategies, crisis management protocols and security management. He holds a B.Sc. degree in Integrated Security & Safety Management. Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“As professionals in these areas, we are so versed in regulations that we get so deep into the woods with management that 30 seconds after you start speaking, they are gone! They can’t even think about it anymore.”Know your audience, prepare your topic and respect your listener. Victor Mencarelli shares these 3 tips for effective communication in this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation. Remember, effective communication is about connecting and making sure your message is heard. It is not meant to be an information dump on your audience. That is why, it is important to carefully consider the perspectives and preferences of your target audience. To some, details are important. Others want you to be brief, be quick and be gone! Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Victor Mencarelli, which also includes an open discussion with a live audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:02:13 Introduction00:03:20 New regulation for personal care products as OTC products00:05:40 Challenges for QA/RA professionals in communicating with senior leaders00:07:15 An example of effective communication 00:08:35 An example of ineffective communication00:11:46 Can we learn to be good communicators?00:14:50 Audience Q&A and general discussion00:29:20 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.Suggested links:Supercommunicators: How to unlock the secret language of connection, by Charles DuhiggAbout Victor MencarelliVictor Mencarelli is currently the Director of Regulatory Affairs at Orveon Global where he leads all aspects of international regulatory affairs including registration, documentation and formulation review for new startup venture capital backed businesses in the cosmetics and personal care industry. He has more than 25 years of industry experience specializing in microbiology, toxicology and regulatory affairs. He holds a B.S. degree in Biology and an M.S. in Biotechnology regulatory affairs. About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“The first thing I do whenever I am starting design control or risk is that I make sure that the intended use and the indication of the device are as nailed down as they can be.”Yes, design control and risk management can be challenging, especially in a startup or a small medical device company. Generally, there is just one person, a “team of one”, responsible for setting up the entire quality system and the risk management process. That is why Becki Hiebert advises practitioners to focus on the intended use first. Get to know what your device is supposed to do, where, on whom, and who interacts with it, to set the framework for your quality system. She recommends following the steps outlined in ISO 14971 for risk analysis, and involving your medical/clinical subject matter experts as early in the design process as possible. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Becki Hiebert, which also includes an open discussion with the audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:02:20 Introduction00:04:32 How to succeed as a “team of one” in a startup00:06:24 Getting started with design controls and risk management in a startup00:08:41 Best practices for following ISO 14971 steps in risk analysis00:12:31 Connecting risk analysis to design controls00:14:15 Lessons learned in managing cybersecurity risk00:17:05 Overcoming challenges in risk management documentation00:19:57 Audience Q&A and general discussion00:30:19 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.About Becki HiebertBecki Hiebert is currently a consultant specializing in implementation and improvement of quality management systems in medical device industry in compliance with ISO 13485, 21 CFR 820 and MDSAP. In her 10+ years of professional experience across both pharmaceutical and medical device industries, she has developed a hands-on expertise in regulatory requirements for current good manufacturing practices. She has served in a variety of roles in quality planning, process improvement, internal audits, quality system training and supplier/purchasing programs.About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“The regulatory landscape is changing significantly and it is too hard to keep up.”That is why Jennifer Mascioli-Tudor advises risk practitioners to be “super proactive” in following these rapid changes, understand the impact, and take a leading role in preparing their organizations. In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, we focus on three big trends in MedTech - the shift from Quality System (QS) regulation to Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR), a new regulatory focus on cybersecurity in medical devices, and shifting regulations of lab developed tests (MDT). Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Jennifer Mascioli-Tudor, which also includes an open discussion with the audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:02:30 Introduction00:04:00 Trend 1: Shift from QSR to QMSR in the US00:07:40 Trend 2: Regulatory focus on cybersecurity in medical devices00:10:30 Trend 3: Regulating Lab Developed Tests (LDT) in the US00:13:10 General discussion: Learning opportunities at universities00:33:07 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.Suggested links:* UC San Diego: Regulatory Affairs for Medical Devices* Pathway for patient health* Drexel University: Doctoral program in Biomedical EngineeringAbout Jennifer Mascioli-TudorJennifer Mascioli-Tudor is currently the Founder and Principal Consultant at JMT consulting offering advisory services to MedTech startups and small manufacturers in business, regulatory and quality management strategy. She is also an instructor at UC San Diego where she teaches regulatory fundamentals and design controls. Her industry experience includes leading roles at J&J, Boston Scientific, Medtronic and GE. She holds a B.S. degree in Physiology/Chemistry/French, and an MBA in Global Business Management.About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“Risk management is inherent to all our roles, whether you are in Regulatory, Quality or R&D, but it is not something we spend a lot of time on”.Risk management in the medical device industry is often seen as a check-the-box activity for regulatory compliance. In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Carolyn Blandford encourages us to not be satisfied with this status quo and help create a dedicated focus on risk management across all processes of the quality system. How can you be a better partner? How can you help build your product’s story from start to finish during development, and later during the post-market phase? This is a leadership opportunity for risk practitioners. It is not enough to build a deep technical knowledge of risk management, but also be mindful of how communication occurs within your organization. Combine your technical know-how with good communication skills to help your team make the best possible decision. This is the key to success in a risk management role. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Devon Campbell, which also includes an open discussion with the audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:01:58 Introduction00:04:15 How risk management helps build and sustain the product story00:05:15 Transitioning into a risk management role 00:08:12 Why we need to create dedicated risk management roles00:10:35 How to lead change by starting small and showing impact00:12:50 Our role in shaping a culture of quality00:15:13 Audience Q&A, general discussion 00:32:30 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.About Carolyn (Beres) BlandfordCarolyn (Beres) Blandford is currently a Senior Project Management Consultant at IPM Integrated Project Management Company. She has over 20 years of professional experience in the in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) industry, first in a scientific role, later moving into a Quality Management role. She developed a strong interest in risk management as a Quality Manager, where she also led the charge to create a dedicated focus on risk management in the organization. Using her strong research, communication and project management skills, she currently supports her clients in planning and implementing strategically critical initiatives. About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“The teams I see really successful are the ones that realize where their gaps lie and stive to reach out to mentors and advisors to fill those gaps”.Developing a medical device and bringing it successfully to the market is a huge challenge, especially for early stage startups. Even for large, established manufacturers, it takes a significant amount of time to launch a new device. In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Devon Campbell encourages us to honestly acknowledge gaps in available resources, knowledge and skills, and seek to fill those gaps by collaborating with both internal and external resources.It takes a lot of humility to admit that we can’t do it alone. It is true that early stage start up companies face a lot of challenges, but working in a fast-paced environment can be a lot of fun. It does requires a strategic approach to build out the required quality processes just in time to support the overall business strategy. Whether you want to go to market with your own product, or plan an exit through acquisition, it helps to keep the end in mind.Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Devon Campbell, which also includes an open discussion with the audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:01:50 Introduction00:04:23 How it feels to be in a startup environment00:06:25 Success factors for startups00:09:46 A short story of a successful startup exit00:14:00 Audience Q&A, general discussion 00:32:30 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.About Devon CampbellDevon C. Campbell is the Founder and Managing Director at Prodct, where he and his team provides hands-on support and advisory services to early stage medical device, diagnostic, and therapeutic companies. He serves as a mentor, advisor, or board member for several startups. Additionally, he is the Chief Product Officer (CPO) and Senior Vice President of R&D/Quality at myBiometry, an early stage diagnostic company focused on asthma. He also supports the NIH RADx program as a content expert and was the lead author for Chapter 6 of the recent NIH book “Accelerating Diagnostics in a Time of Crisis” exploring quality, risk, and product developing during RADx. He has been active in the medical device industry for more than 25 years in various engineering and leadership roles. He holds BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering.About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

Listen to my reading of a recent LinkedIn article I published to cover 10 noteworthy risk-related posts recently published on LinkedIn. Listen to the recording and follow links below to read the original posts and continue the conversation.🗞️A roundup of 10 noteworthy risk-related posts on LinkedIn! 1️⃣ Horst Simon advises risk practitioners to serve as advisors and facilitators instead of playing a traffic cop.2️⃣ Jijo James shares a new tool that significantly reduces device-related interruptions when used with the WHO's surgical safety checklist.3️⃣ Aaron Joseph recommends adopting a more flexible "re-entrant design controls" approach to manage frequent design changes and upgrades.4️⃣ Stefan Hunziker, PhD, CICP offers 6 tips for boosting your risk management expertise where leaning from failures is not an option.5️⃣ Wag Hanna shares how augmented intelligence tools can help support risk management while also enabling a culture of transparency.6️⃣ Vincent F. Cafiso seeks to clarify FDA's position on requirements for clinical studies in QMSR.7️⃣ George Zack invites a conversation to identify risks in real world activities such clearing snow from sidewalks and roads.8️⃣ Chuck Ventura offers tips for considering design controls at the drug/device interface in a combination product.9️⃣ Daniel Adler spotlights a new FDA draft guidance on cybersecurity to cover any device if it includes software and internet connectivity.🔟Marco Felsberger reminds us that we can't always reliably model extreme events and managing risk exposure might be more effective.Share in comments 👇your favorite risk-related post covered in this podcast. Let's Talk Risk! is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“The eyes can only see what the mind understands.”The world of medical devices is complex. There are many regulations, standards and guidance documents to read and understand, and apply them correctly during design, development and clinical investigations for regulatory success. In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Dr. Emanuel Tkach encourages us to keep the big picture in mind. Engineers and Clinicians, who are not generally trained in regulatory affairs, also need to develop a good understanding of these requirements. As an example, we must clearly understand the intended use and indication for our device. It is in the context of the intended use that we have to plan and conduct our clinical investigations to generate evidence of safety and effectiveness. AI-enabled devices, including those used for detection and diagnosis, presents unique issues. Data privacy and security, including cybersecurity vulnerabilities need to be addressed. Risk of using open source data should carefully considered during development, testing and final use. Unless absolutely necessary, it is best not to use open source data. Another potential area of concern is physician over-reliance on AI/ML devices. Dr. Tkach reminds us to keep the following in mind:At the end of the day, an AI-enabled device is a tool to be used by the clinician and not as a substitute for clinical judgment. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Dr. Emanuel Tkach, which also includes an open discussion with the audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:02:05 Introduction00:04:13 CADe and CADx: two types of computer aided detection and diagnosis00:05:23 Addressing physician over-reliance on technology in clinical trials00:07:14 Relevant ISO standards for AI, clinical investigations and quality00:10:14 Clinical perspective on designing AI-enabled devices and managing risk00:15:38 How non-regulatory professionals should approach regulations and standards00:17:20 Audience Q&A00:32:30 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.About Emanuel Tkach, MDDr. Emanuel Tkach is currently the Medical Advisor at HeartPoint Global, where he leads the global clinical strategy and operations of clinical trials. He also provides advice on breakthrough device designation submissions, recruiting and strategizing with key opinion leaders (KOL) to accelerate medical device innovation. His medical specialty and clinical experience includes Gastroenterology, Cardiology and Primary Care. He holds a BS degree in Biology/Biological Sciences and an MD in Medicine. About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“Continuous lifecycle approach to risk management is still not broadly understood or applied in the industry”. In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Kevin Posey highlights a gap in the industry practice of risk management, especially in the context of purchasing controls. Starting with the recent Boeing issue, where a cabin door in a 737 Max 9 blew open during flight, Kevin shares that there is often a disconnect between supplier risk management and product risk management in our own industry. Many of the safety critical functionalities of a medical device rely on adequate control of purchased product through supplier controls. Yet, Supplier Quality and Product Development functions tend to operate in silos. A siloed operating model leads to device malfunctions with serious consequences in the post-market phase, that have their origin in the quality of purchased products. One area of significant vulnerability is the use of off-the-shelf products, including software, where it is sometimes not feasible to identify and implement appropriate purchasing controls. There is a renewed focus on purchasing controls in the revised Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR), which is due to go into effect in early 2026. We have to start applying a risk-based approach to ensure compliance and manage risk to patients. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Kevin Posey, which also includes an open discussion with the audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:02:05 Introduction00:03:26 Challenges in supplier quality controls in light of recent Boeing issue00:05:30 A renewed focus on supplier controls in QMSR00:06:48 Disconnect between supplier risk management and product risks00:09:50 An example highlighting challenges in supplier risk management00:13:49 Audience Q&A00:31:13 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.About Kevin PoseyKevin Posey is currently the Director of Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance at Genesys Spine. He began his career in the Aerospace and Defense industry as a systems engineer. Later he moved to the medical device industry, where he advanced his career over a span of 25+ years in leading roles at multiple organizations covering a broad range of medical specialties. He holds a BS degree in Aerospace Engineering and MBA in International Business with additional Masters level studies in Systems Engineering and Biomedical Engineering.About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“Risk management is often seen as a check the box activity”. Taylor Dieringer reminds us in this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation that risk management should be an ongoing, continuous process within your quality management system, that monitors, evaluates and controls risk throughout the product lifecycle, and not just in the pre-market phase. The post-market surveillance process serves as a link between real-world safety performance of a medical device and design and development of new products to achieve this objective. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Taylor Dieringer, which also includes an open discussion with the audience. Jump to a section of interest using these timestamps.00:02:30 Introduction00:04:03 What is post-market surveillance and why it is needed00:06:51 Post-market surveillance process is a continual learning process00:08:05 Setting thresholds for action during post-market surveillance00:11:00 How to detect and evaluate safety signals00:13:40 Why we need a cross-functional team for post-market surveillance00:16:37 Audience Q&A00:30:05 Closing comments and key takeawaysIf you enjoyed this podcast, consider subscribing to the Let’s Talk Risk! newsletter.About Taylor DieringerTaylor Dieringer is currently a staff quality engineer at iRhythm Technologies, Inc. where he leads risk management activities throughout all phases of the product lifecycle, ranging from design to post-market surveillance. He is a biomedical engineer by training with prior experience in design and development, quality assurance and risk management at multiple medical device organizations. About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

Dear colleagues, hello! 👋A special welcome to the 40 new members who have joined our Let’s Talk Risk! community in the first week of April! Feel free to browse past articles in the archive section of the Let’s Talk Risk! website, and check out recordings of recent LTR conversations in the podcast section. Here are links to articles published this week.AnnouncementsSpecial offer - save 20% on annual subscriptionEnjoying the free content on Let’s Talk Risk!? Upgrade your subscription with this special offer to enjoy even more benefits:1️⃣ Premium articles: Case studies of FDA warning letters, recalls, ISO 14971 fundamentals, medical device news updates.2️⃣ Monthly LTR webinar: Build deeper knowledge of risk management and get your specific questions answered.3️⃣ 20% off training: You get automatic 20% off on training and coaching offers via ACHIEVE. 4️⃣ Exclusive monthly podcast: Gain insights from industry leading voices5️⃣ Ability to start a discussion thread on LTR Chat!Check out our Wall of Love to see what others are saying!LTR weekly conversation on LinkedIn: A physician’s view on AI in healthcareJoin me next Friday, April 12, 2024 at 11:00 AM EST, for another Let’s Talk Risk! conversation on LinkedIn. My guest this week is Dr. Niranjan Seshadri, who will share his perspectives as an interventional cardiologist on AI in healthcare.Ask a risk management questionGot a risk management question? Now you can submit your question and get answers through a new feature on Let’s Talk Risk!. If I pick your question for an AMA article, you will get free access to premium content for 30 days! Weekly Knowledge ChallengeI hope you enjoyed the knowledge challenge question last week. Here is the correct answer:The correct answer for the question, “A hazard always leads to harm” is False. Here is this weeks’ knowledge challenge #281-Question Feedback SurveyWant to share feedback? Send a message to me!If you are finding value in LTR, please give us a shout out and show your love🙏 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

“Diabetes is a terrible way to die.”This comment from David Sturgis in our Let’s Talk Risk! conversation really moved me. As engineers and QA/RA professionals, we mainly focus on building and launching safe and effective medical devices. We don’t always get to spend time with patients and doctors to understand their perspective. That is why it is insightful to hear from David about his experience with a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and how it changed his life in a positive way. Diabetes is a difficult chronic condition. Nearly 40 million people in the United States alone are estimated to be living with diabetes. CGMs have made a big impact in not only managing the A1C for diabetic patients, but also improving their overall quality of life. When we listen to patients - really listen - we can understand not only their “needs” but also their fears, wants and desires. For example, we may be focused on the functionality of our devices, but patients also worry about whether they will be covered by insurance. Affordability and accessibility are major concerns, even though they may not appear in our list of “user needs” during the design and development process. “I am in it to win it”, David shares in this conversation. It is a good reminder to all of us to think of patients as people, and not as an anonymous consumer. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with David Sturgis which also includes an open discussion with the audience. About David SturgisDavid Sturgis is an IT and Operations management professional with more than 25 years of experience in project and lifecycle management. He is skilled building and optimizing organizational processes, measurement systems and infrastructure to maximize business results. He has an MBA from University of Florida, and a BS in Computer Engineering from University of South Florida. About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly unlocking new applications in the medical arena. It is challenging to keep up with something moving so fast. ChatGPT was launched just a couple of years ago, and we are already talking about artificial general intelligence (AGI) for medical purposes! In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Prof. Papademetris shares that indeed we are in a new game with plenty of opportunities. But we have to start learning in a new way. We will fail in non-obvious ways, and we will fail often. How do we harness the power of this technology without compromising patient safety or other ethical concerns?Case in point - AI is just one part of the overall system where a medical device needs to operate safely. We need to design the overall software for its intended use by considering the system level requirements. It is the whole software that needs to serve its intended purpose when used within the broader healthcare system.“People drive cars, not an engine!”, Prof. Papademetris reminds us so eloquently in this conversation. Patient safety is an important factor for a medical device. So far, FDA has managed the risk by including a human in the decision making loop and not allowing a stand-alone, autonomous AI system for clinical decisions. An important question is how to share information with the user? There is a human factors component to AI, which needs to be carefully considered.In practice this proves to be quite challenging. Application of AI in medical software requires a true cross-functional approach. As Prof. Papademetris reminds us, we need to learn to speak each other’s language:The biggest challenge we face is not being good in our discipline, but how to become at least competent in other disciplines to facilitate a truly cross functional problem solving approach when building medical software. In the rapidly evolving world of AI, we need a new approach to medical software development. It used to be that data was secondary to code in traditional software development, but now code is becoming fairly standard, and the question is about data. How broadly does it represent the use cases you want to represent? Bias in the model is a serious concern. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Prof. Papademetris which also includes an open discussion with the audience. About Prof. Xenophon PapademetrisXenophon Papademtris is currently a Professor at the Yale University School of Medicine where he focuses on research in image analysis and software development. He has recently launched a certificate course for industry professionals to provide a comprehensive understanding of both technical and regulatory aspects of medical software and medical AI. He is also the lead author of a new textbook Introduction to Medical Software: Foundations for Digital Health, Devices and Diagnostics (Cambridge University Press, 2022), and the main instructor for the companion Coursera Class. About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

Listen to my reading of a recent LinkedIn article I published to cover 10 noteworthy risk-related posts recently published on LinkedIn. Listen to the recording and follow links below to read the original posts and continue the conversation.🗞️A roundup of 10 noteworthy risk-related posts on LinkedIn! 1️⃣ Randy Horton spotlights top 10 Health Technology Hazards for 2024 compiled by ECRI.2️⃣ Marco Felsberger reminds us that planning is useful, but building capability is even more important to handle uncertainty in our complex world.3️⃣ Chad Johnson explains how using a QFD can help us focus on the customer when building an FMEA4️⃣ Mark F. Witcher, Ph.D. encourages us to take a systems-view of risk instead of an event-based view during risk analysis.5️⃣ Boris Gurevich shares a draft document from IMDRF on SaMD device considerations and risk characterization.6️⃣ Darrin Carlson, RAC-Devices, PMP highlights the omission of DHF, DMR and DHR from the QMSR and how to map them under ISO 13485.7️⃣ Jan Beger shares a study that focuses on factors affecting patients' trust in AI for treatment decisions.8️⃣ Joseph Kvedar shares a review article about risk prediction models using AI for diabetes care and unresolved issues for implementation.9️⃣ Stefan Hunziker, PhD, CICP highlights an unintended consequence of ignoring correlation among individual risks.🔟Annmarie Nicolson shows how HFE activities interact with multiple workstreams during design and development.Share in comments 👇your favorite risk-related post covered in this podcast. Let's Talk Risk! is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

One of the key requirements of ISO 13485, the International Standard for medical device Quality Management Systems is establish a link between risk management and the design and development process.In practice this proves to be quite challenging. In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Chuck Ventura shares that medical device design and development process is a chaotic process. Design controls should be considered as a way to keep track and stay organized in the face of inherent chaos of the process. In the context of Design Controls, it is helpful to see risk analysis as an aspect of good engineering and not just a paper exercise. When risk analysis is integrated early in the design process, it helps inform design choices to optimize both safety and performance of the medical device. As an example, when you are trying to decide among various design choices represented by different prototypes, it may be helpful to conduct early usability studies to find out potential use-related issues and failures. Design choices that eliminate potential use-errors are more effective in reducing risk and delivering a final product that is both safe and effective. A best practice is to start with a systems-level risk analysis to develop a preliminary understanding of hazards and hazardous situations. As our understanding of risks evolves, more sophisticated techniques such as design FMEAs can be applied to different design concepts to fully analyze failure risks in the context of identified hazards and hazardous situations. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Chuck Ventura which also includes an open discussion with the audience. About Chuck VenturaChuck Ventura is currently the Founder and CEO at Ventura Solutions, LLC, a consulting firm specializing in end-to-end consulting, staffing and training services for the medical device and combination products industry. He has nearly 20 years of experience in the Life Sciences industry across a variety of roles in product development, risk management, design controls, project management audits and inspection readiness. He is a biomechanical engineer with advanced graduate degrees in aerospace and mechanical engineering. About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

Listen to my reading of a recent LinkedIn article I published to cover 10 of my favorite LinkedIn posts on risk-related topics. Listen to the recording and follow links below to read the original posts and continue the conversation.🗞️A roundup of my favorite risk-related posts on LinkedIn! 1️⃣ Bryan Whitefield says the job of a risk practitioner is to uncover the elephant in the room! Read the original post here and continue the conversation. 2️⃣ Annmarie Nicolson explains why Human Factors Engineering is more than a tick-box exercise. Read the original post here and continue the conversation. 3️⃣ Chuck Ventura shares tips to accelerate Product Development with "Great Design Inputs". Read the original post here and continue the conversation. 4️⃣ Helen Gerhard invites conversation to understand underlying problems behind recent Philips CPAP issues, especially around design controls. Read the original post here and continue the conversation. 5️⃣ HATEM RABEH, MD, MSc ing RABEH, MD, MSc shares insights to help estimate sample sizes for clinical studies. Read the original post here and continue the conversation. 6️⃣ Vincent F. Cafiso reminds us to follow requirements for rework in light of the recent Boeing 737 max issue. Read the original post here and continue the conversation. 7️⃣ George Zack highlights a common software testing trap in medical device design and development. Read the original post here and continue the conversation. 8️⃣ Korey Johnson discusses human factors issues in medical software with Xenophon Papademetris. Read the original post here and continue the conversation. 9️⃣ Wag Hanna reminds us that risk management is not about eliminating risk. Read the original post here and continue the conversation. 🔟On a lighter note, the modern approach to risk really began with a gambling problem! Read the original post here and continue the conversation. Share in comments 👇your favorite risk-related post covered in this podcast. Let's Talk Risk! is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

We have been used to treating the term hazard as a potential source of harm. We are also familiar with the concept of exposure to hazard in a hazardous situation as a necessary condition for harm to occur.The question, often left unanswered, is whether the duration of exposure has any effect on the type and severity of harm experienced by the user/patient.In this insightful conversation, James Catmur challenges us to consider the duration factor of a hazard as a factor when conducting risk assessments. Drawing on his years of experience across multiple industry sectors, James shares that considering a hazards as states or events can help us more accurately assess each risk in terms of their frequency and/or duration. As an example:In the chemical sector, if it is a state, then the dose is what you use use to assess the risk . If it is an event, then you consider the direct impact. An explosion is the over-pressure. If it is a chemical release then how long that release is for. If you release chlorine for 30 minutes the severity would be very different from releasing for 10 seconds. In the medical device industry, a common challenge is to consider the impact of delay in treatment. It depends on how long it lasts and what else happens during that state. There is also a difference between delay in treatment vs. denial of treatment, or service, for example as a result of a cyberattack. A clear understanding of the type and duration of delay can be helpful in a better understanding of the nature and severity of risk.Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with James Catmur which also includes an open discussion with the audience. About James CatmurJames Catmur is currently the Director of JC&A Ltd., where he advises clients on risk projects in R&D implementation, safety management and risk assessments. Previously he was at Arthur D. Little in a variety of roles with increasing responsibility in a career spanning over 25 years. About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

Recently, I was invited by Richard Granquist and Linford Leitch from NAMSA to talk about risk management as part of their monthly RA QA Cafe podcast. In part 1 of a 2 part series, we discussed the following topics in a very open and engaging conversation!* How I got into risk management.* How I think about risk management in a small vs. large organization.* Why risk management is not a paper exercise, it is a process.* Why risk management approach should align with business goals.* A leadership opportunity for risk practitioners to shape culture.* How a systematic approach helps you do risk management well.* Risk management is a cross-functional activity; involve regulatory early. * Treat risk management not as an add-on but part of your quality system.* Documentation is important but we need to make it easy and less burdensome.Listen to the podcast above and share your views in comments below.About NAMSA and RA QA CafeNAMSA is a leading service provider to the global MedTech industry specializing in CRO (Clinical Research Organization) services, medical device testing capabilities, strategic guidance and tactical support to fast-track market introduction. Learn more about NAMSA, their services and expertise here. The RA QA Cafe is a conversational podcast where each episode features NAMSA consultants and invited guests to discuss Quality and Regulatory Affairs related topics relevant to the MedTech industry. DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

A common challenge for risk practitioners in the medical device industry is to efficiently link their risk management process with the design controls process.The output of risk management activities needs to be linked to the design process before design inputs are finalized. However, this proves to be quite challenging in practice. One reason is that a lot of work in the industry is often done in functional silos In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Daniel highlights the importance of building trust between different functions, especially Quality and R&D organizations. Leaders in these organizations need to create and nurture a collaborative work environment where engineers can feel safe and empowered to work together for the common goal of developing innovative, safe and effective products. One specific example where cross-functional collaboration is especially useful is when we are try to establish reliability levels required for different functional requirements for a device under considerations. It requires a lot of trade-offs, which should be driven by a careful analysis of stakeholder expectations, regulatory requirements and the state of art. It is also useful to engage with medical/clinical colleagues to collect early clinical input to support these decisions. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Daniel Roberts which also includes an open discussion with the audience. About Daniel RobertsDaniel Roberts is currently the Founder and Principal at Medical Device How, a MedTech consulting firm focused on personalized medical device strategies in the areas of Design Controls, Digitalization, Smart QMS, QMS training, Cybersecurity and Career Coaching. He has worked at several leading medical device manufacturers over the last 20 years in a variety of roles ranging from Quality and Compliance to R&D. He is also a certified ISO 13485 Internal Auditor. About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

Who is responsible for patient safety in a medical device manufacturing organization?When asked this question, a common response is likely to be that it is a shared responsibility across the entire organization. After all, everyone should be thinking about patient safety in their specific role and perform their duties such that patient safety is not compromised. It is true that no single individual or department can be held completely responsible for safety. But when everyone is responsible, no one is really responsible! In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Mark Armstrong explains how medical safety professionals can serve as culture brokers by translating the language of different functions to help create a central awareness of patient safety. Each function within a large, complex organization, is understandably focused on their specific goals and objectives. R&D is responsible for developing new products and improving the existing ones with design changes. Clinical affairs is responsible for planning and generating clinical evidence to support regulatory submissions. Manufacturing is responsible for consistently producing high quality product at low cost. Medical affairs is responsible for building external relationships with key opinion leaders.There is a need to bridge the gap among these functional areas which often operate in silos. This is where Medical Safety professionals have a key role to play as a culture brokers to create and nurture a common culture of patient safety. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Mark Armstrong which also includes an open discussion with the audience. About Mark ArmstrongMark Armstrong is currently the Director of Medical and Pharmacovigilance Safety and Beckton Dickinson. Combining his advanced education in both Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, he has served in clinical and medical safety roles for over 10 years at various leading MedTech organizations. In his current role, he serves as the primary Safety Physician support for Pharmacovigilance and provides internal medical/clinical consultation during design and development as well as during post-market surveillance activities. About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

When it comes to medical devices, we generally think about only clinical benefits as we plan our clinical investigations to generate scientific evidence for demonstrating safety and effectiveness. However, medical devices also provide many other quality-of life-benefits that are often overlooked during benefit-risk evaluation. One reason is that these benefits are often subjectively experienced by patients, and not usually quantified during clinical investigations. In this LTR conversation, Ronald challenges us to consider quality-of-life benefits in a quantifiable way during clinical investigations. He shares an example of a minimally invasive orthopedic device to support the meniscus without the need for a total knee replacement. In this case the risk of frequent revision surgery is offset by the significant quality-of-life benefits. That is why it is important to also consider quality-of-life benefits in the overall benefit-risk evaluation. A good practice is to develop a method to quantify quality-of -life benefits important to patients, and generate data to demonstrate measurably significant difference in these benefits using the device. Ronald also shares some of the emerging expectations of notified bodies for the newly created role of a PRRC. Personal risk and liability for a PRRC is limited, but you must demonstrate training and competence. However, negligence and intentional mistakes on part of PRRC can result in legal liability. A best practice is to assign a dedicated role as PRRC and not serve in a dual capacity as department head and PRRC at the same time. Listen to this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation with Ronald Boumans which also includes an open discussion with the audience. About Ronald BaumansRonald Baumans is currently the founder and strategic consultant at Boumans Regulatory Consulting B.V, providing consulting and PRRC services to medical device companies across Europe. Previously he served as Senior Global Regulatory Consultant and Program Manager for European Regulatory Affairs at Emergo by UL. His professional experience spans over 30 years across multiple industry-leading organizations. He is also the founder of PRRC Academy, where he provides training about this emerging role in the medtech industry. About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

Dear colleagues, hello! 👋A special welcome to 75+ new members who have joined our Let’s Talk Risk! community this month! Feel free to browse past articles in the archive section of the Let’s Talk Risk! website, and check out recordings of recent LTR conversations in the podcast section. Check out these recent articles published last week on LTR➡️The upcoming Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) is expected to place a heavy emphasis on risk as the FDA seeks to align the current regulation with global standards. This premium article offers a review of risk-based requirements in ISO 13485 and guidance for implementation. ➡️In this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation, Bijan Elahi shares tips for creating and nurturing an environment of collaboration in risk management. ➡️A common challenge in risk management is to fully understand and control risks due to reasonably foreseeable misuse. This is why you need a robust post-market surveillance process so you can take timely action to ensure your devices continue to remain safe and effective. Upcoming eventsLTR weekly conversation on LinkedIn: Connecting risk management and design controls to accelerate product innovationJoin me next Friday, January 19, 2024 at 11:00 AM EST, for another Let’s Talk Risk! conversation on LinkedIn. My guest this week is Chuck Ventura, who will share insights on how we can connect risk management and design controls to accelerate medical device innovation.LTR monthly webinar series: Getting ready for QMSRA quick reminder to join me in this month’s webinar, where I will review some of the risk-based requirements of ISO 13485:2016 that may be relevant for your QMS as you prepare for the upcoming Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) expected to be finalized soon. If you are a paid subscriber, an email has been sent to you with a link to register for this month’s webinar on January 16, 2023 at 11:00 AM EST. You don’t need to pay extra. Please check your spam or promotions folder if you cannot find it in your inbox.If you a free subscriber, you can upgrade your subscription to attend this webinar, or with a one time payment of only $25. Click the link below to complete your payment and secure your spot. Once you complete the payment, you will receive the registration link by email.Pre-registration is now open for the next session of Live ISO 14971 training on ACHIEVE. Paid subscribers get 20% off regular price!Save your spot here to join the next cohort of the LIVE ISO 14971 certification training course starting in January 2024. Watch a course introduction video and check out testimonials from past attendees!Weekly Knowledge ChallengeI hope you enjoyed the knowledge challenge question last week. Here is the correct answer:The correct answer for the question, “What is your best estimate of the number of times the terms “risk” or “risks” appear in ISO 13485:2016?”, is between 30-40 times. Here is this weeks’ knowledge challenge #151-Question Feedback SurveyIf you are finding value in reading LTR, please give us a shout out and show your love🙏 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

The practice of risk management in a heavily regulated industry such as medical devices is hard. There are many challenging questions that must be resolved in a simple way that is both sensible and defensible to demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements.Questions such as how should we estimate P1 and P2 for each risk? How do analyze benefit vs. risk? How do we analyze risks associated with use of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML)? What should be our criteria for risk acceptability? How do we manage the many moving parts of our risk management file to ensure its integrity? There are no clear cut answers to these practical challenges. That is why Bijan Elahi, a leading expert in safety risk management of medical devices, encourages us to collaborate more to find creative solutions to these thorny problems. There is no shortage of tough problems in risk management. Talking to each other will open up ways and solutions that you may not have imagined. Collaboration cannot be forced. It requires a willingness and a sense of generosity in sharing our unique insights openly with each other. Management can help by creating an environment where everyone feels safe to engage and share freely. But it is up to all of us to work together and collaborate. Risk management is truly a team sport!In this highly inspirational conversation, Bijan shares his perspective and tips for improving collaboration in risk management. About Bijan ElahiBijan Elahi is the founder of MedTech Safety and a globally recognized expert on safety risk management of medical devices. He currently serves as a technical fellow and corporate advisor on product safety risk management at Medtronic. In this capacity, he offers education and consulting on risk management to all Medtronic business units worldwide. He has trained over 10,000 people worldwide and his book Safety Risk Management of Medical Devices, now in its second edition, is a bestseller.About Let’s Talk Risk with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

Dear colleagues, hello! 👋Happy New Year to you! I am super excited to continue our work here on Let’s Talk Risk! (LTR) with the single-minded focus on helping all of us achieve success in risk management. Our industry is going through a major transition, with rapidly advancing technology and evolving regulatory landscape across the globe. That is why it is even more important now to support the risk practitioner community through LTR. In 2024, we will focus on the following themes:* Getting ready for the QMSR transition in the US* Tracking AI/ML applications in MedTech* Navigating the evolving regulatory environment, especially for SaMD and Cybersecurity* Growing the LTR communityIt’s going to be a great year! Best wishes to all of you in your work and I look forward to continuing our risk management journey together!Here are links to the articles published last week on LTR➡️Here is an update on FDA device approvals, 510ks, De Novos, recalls and warning letters issued during the month of November 2023. This is part of our monthly Medical Device News Update series. ➡️What does it take to be “inspection ready” at all times? “Inspection readiness is a frame of mind, a daily practice, not a destination or a project deliverable”, says Vincent F. Cafiso in this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation. ➡️Generally speaking, design and development of medical devices is primarily driven by engineering considerations focused on desired functionality. Although, early clinical input is highly desired, direct access to physician’s and other users of a device in the clinical setting is not available to the design team.This quick tip reminds us that understanding the full clinical context of use and physician’s view is essential for designing safe and effective devices. Upcoming eventsLTR monthly webinar series: Getting ready for QMSRA quick reminder to join me in this month’s webinar, where I will review some of the risk-based requirements of ISO 13485:2016 that may be relevant for your QMS as you prepare for the upcoming Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) expected to be finalized soon. If you are a paid subscriber, you will receive an email with a link to register for this month’s webinar on January 16, 2023 at 11:00 AM EST. You don’t need to pay extra.If not, you can still attend this webinar with a one time payment of only $25. Click the link below to make a payment and secure your spot. Once you complete the payment, you will receive the registration link by email.Pre-registration is now open for the next session of Live ISO 14971 training on ACHIEVE. Paid subscribers get 20% off regular price!Save your spot here to join the next cohort of the LIVE ISO 14971 certification training course starting in January 2024. Watch a course introduction video and check out testimonials from past attendees!LTR weekly conversation on LinkedIn: Listening session for feedback and networkingJoin me next Friday, January 12, 2024 at 11:00 AM EST, for another Let’s Talk Risk! conversation on LinkedIn. This will be a general networking and feedback session. Weekly Knowledge ChallengeI hope you enjoyed the knowledge challenge question last week. Here is the correct answer:The correct answer for the question, “Which of the following best represents the full scope of the term risk applicable to a medical device in the context of ISO 13485:2016”, is “Safety + Performance + Regulatory Requirements”. Only 50% of the respondents got it right!Here is this weeks’ knowledge challenge #141-Question Feedback SurveyIf you are finding value in reading LTR, please give us a shout out and show your love🙏 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

The news of an FDA investigator showing up unannounced at a medical device manufacturing facility generally sends a wave of panic throughout the organization! Even when it is a planned inspection, or an audit visit from a notified body, there is a high level of stress before, during and after the inspection. A lot of effort is spent in “getting ready” for the inspection or the audit, documentation is checked and re-checked, work areas are cleaned up and people are asked to be on their best behavior!It is like cramming for a test, desperately hoping for a passing grade!“Inspection readiness is a frame of mind, a daily practice, not a destination or a project deliverable”, says Vincent F. Cafiso in this Let’s Talk Risk! conversation. It is not about "managing” an inspection or audit; rather it is about creating a culture of Quality, open communication and collaboration where everyone feels confident in their work, and they are not afraid to be observed and challenged by an auditor. In such an environment, every team member has a clear understanding of how their work relates to product quality and how it affects their end users and patients. They seek to improve on a daily basis, finding gaps and promptly addressing them. When people show passion and commitment to quality, working as if the product they are making will be used by a family member, you can feel a culture of Quality.When it becomes a matter of daily practice, supported by a culture of Quality, you can be inspection ready any day!About Vincent F. CafisoVincent F. Cafiso started his career as an investigator at the US FDA, where he conducted hundreds of complex investigations at medical device and IVD manufacturers, both domestic and outside the United States. Subsequently, he spent over 25 years at leading medical device manufacturers helping them become inspection-ready through robust internal audit and compliance programs and a strategic focus on developing a culture of Quality. He is currently the Founder and Managing Consultant at Practical Compliance Results, LLC where he offers advisory services to clients in inspection readiness, compliance, quality assurance and quality systems consulting. About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

Artificial Intelligence (AI) now affects almost every aspect of our personal and professional life. It is also changing the way we work, especially in the knowledge industry. According to a recent report from McKinsey Global Institute about the generative AI and the future of work, 30% of the hours worked in many professional activities across the US economy could be automated by 2030. But AI will actually enhance the work done by STEM professionals, creative and legal professionals. If there are new challenges for professionals in many industries due to AI, there are also enormous opportunities for those who embrace it and find creative ways to stand out in this hyper-competitive job market. In this podcast, Elena Kyria shares insights and tips for career success. She was recently recognized as a Top LinkedIn voice for QA/RA recruiting in the Life Sciences industry. About Elena KyriaElena Kyria is currently the founder an CEO at Elemed, a leading European recruitment firm in the MedTech space, specializing in medical devices, diagnostics, IVD, MDR, IVDR, ISO 13485, CE Marking, 510(k), Regulatory Affairs, Quality, Clinical, and Notified Body consulting services. She is also the host of Career Diaries by Elemed, a podcast dedicated to helping QA/RA professionals learn about the latest insights and tips from seasoned industry executives. About Let’s Talk Risk with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

Rapid advancement in digital technologies and cloud computing offer huge opportunities for medical devices, but they are also forcing us to change our approach to design, development and risk management. In this high energy Let’s Talk Risk! conversation Randy Horton inspires us to take a risk-based approach when building and managing connected devices. Historically, we have considered medical devices as a “fortress” with a high level of engineering control and a defensive “moat” of change control around them to ensure safety and effectiveness. In the new world of digital technologies and cloud computing, we need to think of them as “container ships” that need to safely reach their destination, but we cannot control the ocean. That is why, we need to focus on resiliency and not redundancy. In the past, we tried to control every possible variable to the extent possible and minimize potential failures. Now, we have to acknowledge that medical devices operate in a complex environment, and that things will break down. We do have to apply solid engineering principles in design, but we also need to have a robust surveillance system in place to continually monitor data and take timely action when circumstances change without warning.And we have to make risk-based design choices. As an example, certain software functions of a device involved in real-time decision making and life-saving action cannot be “outsourced” to the cloud. On the other hand, we can use cloud computing to monitor and analyze long-term data to improve our algorithms.Randy encourages risk practitioners in the industry to get involved and shape this conversation. We don’t have to wait until new regulations are developed and finalized. Even the regulatory agencies are trying to figure out the best way to regulate software-based connected devices without slowing down the pace of innovation. About Randy HortonRandy Horton is currently the Chief Solutions Officer at Orthogonal, a product development and consulting firm specializing in Software as a Medical Device (SaMD), digital therapeutics (DTx) and connected devices. With a strong business and analytical acumen, Randy facilitates digital transformations by increasing internal agility, cultivating strategic partnerships, and implementing entrepreneurial ideas. He has over 20 years of experience in product management, business development and consulting. Randy graduated from the University of Michigan with a Bachelors in History and a Masters in Information Studies. About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

The increasing adoption of Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) has led to a major shift in current auditing practices in the medical device industry. MDSAP has forced auditors to apply a process-based audit approach rather than a checklist-based approach. The focus in a process-based audit is on process effectiveness and not just element-by-element compliance with regulatory requirements. As a seasoned auditor with more than 15 years of industry experience, Rick Rios reminds us that external auditors, such as FDA investigators or Notified Body auditors, are not coming in to look for compliance issues. Rather, they are coming in to look at effectiveness of the system and its processes. So, how do we focus our efforts on process effectiveness? In this episode, Rick offers an invaluable insight - the purpose statement of a procedure provides its design intent, because it serves to provide a framework for establishing objectives to measure the process. It is a review of performance against those objectives that auditors evaluate process effectiveness. That is why we must write a purpose statement clearly and make sure it is understood well by everyone involved in a given process. About Rick RiosRick Rios started his career in the defense industry working as a systems engineer in nuclear programs. Inspired by the Total Quality Management movement, he moved into a Quality and Regulatory role, and later worked in automotive and aerospace industries as an independent auditor. He has been active in the medical device industry as an independent auditor over nearly 15 years. He has successfully developed, integrated, implemented and audited quality systems based on ISO 13485, 21CFR820, MDSAP, EUMDR, DOE QC-1, NQA-1, ISO 9001, ISO 17025, NCSL Z540, and Baldrige Performance Excellence Program.About Let’s Talk Risk with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

When we practice risk management mainly for the purpose of compliance, we are really faking it!A compliance-focused approach to risk management only leads to an ever increasing number of complex procedures, rules and documentation rather than nurturing a culture of empowerment and customer focus. Risk management in such an environment becomes a check-the-box exercise. In this episode, Vilma Nasteckiene challenges us to critically examine our current practices and adopt a more customer-centric approach. Drawing on her extensive experience in the banking industry, she advises us to work collaboratively, and to develop processes that aim to serve our customers while staying true to the organization’s core values.When fear drives our actions just to be in compliance with regulations, we take a check-the-box approach to risk management. On the other hand, when we do the right things right, and with courage, we not only produce business results and serve our customers, we also naturally comply with regulations. Be brave to ask uncomfortable questions, including what we must stop doing and how we should improve our processes to achieve our objectives.That is how we start unfaking risk management!About Vilma NasteckieneVilma Nasteckiene is the co-founder and partner at The Holistic Enterprise, where she helps organizations to embrace a new management philosophy that enables them to adapt to a changing world by transforming old paradigms into holistic value-creating interdependencies interacting with the ecosystem. She holds a Ph.D. in Social Sciences and management from ISM University of Management and Economics, where she also serves as a risk practice researcher on a part-time basis. She has over 10 years of experience in risk management in retail and banking. About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

Digital technologies are being rapidly deployed in medical applications. Buzzwords such as AI/ML, SaMD and Digital Therapeutics are fast becoming a part of our vocabulary in the medical device and the broader healthcare space. While there is new excitement about the potential to solve some of our most challenging medical problems, there is also a lot of uncertainty in the regulatory approach to devices using based on these technologies.In this episode, Pascal Werner shares this enthusiasm while also highlighting highlighting challenges associated with their application in medical devices.About Pascal WernerPascal Werner is a freelance consultant advising startups and small/medium enterprises focusing on digital therapeutics, digital health, AI and SaMD in developing a successful regulatory strategy supported by a robust quality management system and technical documentation. His expertise in software development and entrepreneurial thinking, combined with his knowledge of laws and regulations, allows Pascal to offer comprehensive regulatory services. He holds Masters degrees in Biomedical Engineering from Germany and Malaysia.About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

If the US FDA has approved or cleared a medical device as safe and effective, you would expect it to be equally effective across the entire patient population within the scope of its intended use.Well, you may be surprised to learn that current industry practices in design, development, and testing of medical devices inadvertently introduce many inherent biases in these devices that can lead to preventable harm in some patients.In this episode, Lori-Ann Archer highlights that inherent bias in medical devices is a serious issue. She emphasizes the need to formalize a requirement for building equity in medical device design control as part of the Quality System Regulation (QSR).She inspires all of us to, first be aware of inherent bias in medical devices, and second, to do our part in improving our design control processes. A good place to start is to update the Quality Policy to be intentional about building equity across our key processes.About Lori-Ann ArcherLori-Ann Archer is currently the founder and CEO of Qafe, the Quality Academy for Excellence, where she offers comprehensive quality insights and consulting services for the cosmetics, medical device and combination product industries. An alumni of the Cornell University alumni of the Electrical Engineering department, she has over 25 years of experience in medical device and combination products as a quality systems subject matter expert and executive leader. She has been involved in building outstanding quality systems at top companies like Google, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Medtronic and multiple startups. She has now dedicated herself to be an advocate and thought leader for equitable development of medical devices, and collaborated with with the Cornell Biomedical Engineering Medical Devices (CUBMD) team to release a white paper on this critical issue (see link below).About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

The term practicable is used in ISO 14971, the International Standard for application of risk management to medical devices, in the context of risk controls and benefit-risk analysis of an individual residual risk.In practice, this “term” causes a lot of confusion! One source of this confusion appears to stem from the fact that the standards uses the “term” practicable as part of a requirement, but also suggests that the “word” practicable may be a part of the manufacturer’s policy for establishing criteria for risk acceptability.In this episode, Ian Sealey shares that there is not a consolidated view on this topic right now. That is why there is a need for a continued conversation on this topic to understand various regulatory requirements and available guidance.About Ian SealeyIan Sealey is currently a medical device regulatory consultant providing regulatory, quality, technical, policy and training services to multinationals and startups. He has previously held engineering positions in both private and the public sectors. He served as a medical device specialist to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the UK and was appointed to the position of Assistant Secretary at the Department of Health. He holds a BEng(Hons) in Medical Engineering and is a BSI qualified ISO 13485:2016 Lead Auditor.About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

Why do many medical devices fail to reach their adoption goal after launch? Or, hit roadblocks during the regulatory review process before launch?In this episode, Sara Vazda shares that one reason why medical device manufacturers struggle to achieve their business goals is that clinical input is generally not a natural part of the design and development (D&D) process. Medical device D&D is generally driven by Engineering, with clinical aspects considered only during the final phase prior to seeking regulatory approval.Bottom line - missing clinical input early in the D&D process results in missing key user needs. Often, it later comes back to haunt us in terms of added time and cost of development, and missing launch timeline.About Sara VazdaSara Vazda is an accomplished expert in the medical device industry, with a focus on guiding startups in medical device development and regulatory adherence. Her unwavering commitment to advancing women's health is exemplified through her strategic partnerships with Femtech companies like Ella and Hormona. As a registered biomedical scientist and specialist in laboratory medicine, Sara has accumulated a wealth of experience in various clinical positions, in both private and public hospitals as well as the medical device industry. This extensive background has cultivated a deep understanding of how clinical considerations can significantly influence the adoption of medical devices by both users and patients, resulting in a comprehensive perspective on how design gaps impact user and patient acceptance.About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

M&A has traditionally been a strong driver of revenue growth for medical device companies. The current M&A environment, however, is very challenging for companies because of several factors, including declining capital funding and falling market valuations.In this environment, QA/RA professionals have a unique opportunity to make an impact in their organizations, advises Steve Silverman. Quality and Regulatory professionals can help bridge the knowledge gap, and in doing so, demonstrate the business acumen needed to advance their careers into senior leadership positions. By analyzing the specific regulatory risks, and translating their potential impact in business terms, they can help achieve business goals.About Steve SilvermanSteve Silverman is president of The Silverman Group. Steve spent more than a decade at FDA in leadership positions across the Agency. He adds private-sector expertise from consulting and representing industry members. Steve develops strategies that satisfy regulators and promote business needs.About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

The current medical device regulation in the European Union (EU-MDR) includes the term clinical evaluation more than 140 times!Clearly, clinical evaluation is now more important than ever under EU-MDR (and IVDR). As a result, a general feeling in the medical device industry is that it is now significantly more challenging to bring innovative new devices to market.Sarah Panten advises practitioners to clearly define clinical benefits of their as part of the clinical evaluation and document the benefit-risk evaluation in the context of the State of the Art. Realize that post-market surveillance is an active process of information collection and review, and that it must be tightly integrated with the clinical evaluation process on a continual basis. About Sarah PantenSarah Panten is currently the Co-Founder and Managing Partner at avasis, which provides digitalization services to companies in the medical device and machinery industry. She has worked as a trainer and a consultant for more than 10 years at different organizations including TUV SUD and NSF. In 2014, she initiated the digitalization of the design control process at iThera Medical to manage complexity and traceability of information. Her current focus is to develop medical device specific software solutions based on the Siemens Polarion software platform to help companies efficiently implement regulatory requirements.About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

At first glance, risk management of diagnostic devices, including in-vitro devices (IVD), is not overly complex. After all, you mostly have to consider the effects of false negative results, false positive results, and invalid or delayed results.However, it can be challenging to correctly assign the severity of harm(s) resulting from inaccurate and/or delayed results if we don’t fully understand the clinical context of the intended use of a diagnostic device.In this episode, Joshua Levin advises risk practitioners to clearly define severity levels of potential harms directly in the risk management plan. This is especially valuable in a small company environment focused on developing a single device. He recommends a simple, more pragmatic approach to risk management for IVDs, driven by a solid understanding of the clinical context.About Joshua LevinJoshua Levin is a regulatory consultant, currently advising early-stage and mid-size companies in developing effective regulatory strategies and building efficient quality management systems, With 30 years of experience in the Quality/Regulatory space, including nearly 10 years at the US FDA, Josh has a deep understanding of both technical and regulatory aspects of IVD commercialization.About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe

We often think of the post-market surveillance (PMS) process as a regulatory requirement for medical devices, especially because of the revised EU-MDR (and IVDR) regulations now in effect in the European Union.But it is more than compliance. According to Per Maegaard, PMS is not just an exercise in meeting regulatory requirements, but intelligence gathering that can help other functions including Marketing. We should think of the PMS process as a value-adding business process, which can provide insights about the real-world clinical experience with our medical device.About Per MaegaardPer Maegaard is currently Director and Lead Auditor at MQC, providing quality consulting, process optimization and auditing services to clients in the medical industry. He has 20+ years of professional experience in Quality and Post-Market Safety and Surveillance at leading multi-national companies such as Stryker, Smith & Nephew and Coloplast. As Director of Post Market Safety at Stryker’s Trauma/Extremity division in Europe, he was responsible for establishing a post-market surveillance program to comply with EU-MDR.About Let’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen AgarwalLet’s Talk Risk! with Dr. Naveen Agarwal is a weekly live audio event on LinkedIn, where we talk about risk management related topics in a casual, informal way. Join us at 11:00 am EST every Friday on LinkedIn.DisclaimerInformation and insights presented in this podcast are for educational purposes only. Views expressed by all speakers are their own and do not reflect those of their respective organizations.If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/subscribe