Truth Jihad Radio

Rumble link Bitchute linkThe discussion of these issues continues on today’s live radio show with Alan Sabrosky and tomorrow’s False Flag Weekly News with J.Michael Springmann.Welcome to Truth Jihad Audio Visual. I'm Kevin Barrett doing this podcast in one form or another since 2006, bringing on a whole lot of the most interesting outside-the-box thinkers and troublemakers. And we're going to continue in that tradition today with the author of a terrific new book Charlottesville and the Death of Free Speech. That's Jason Kessler, who actually was the permit holder at the Charlottesville rally in August of 2017. So, hey, welcome, Jason, and congratulations on this great book.Thank you very much. I appreciate you having me on.Yeah, well, I appreciate your book. It confirmed a lot of my suspicions, since I get information from both the usual mainstream sources and the alternative sources, and I noticed this is one of those cases where you really have to look at the alternative sources. Because they (the mainstream sources) were putting out such a one-sided propaganda narrative. And your side of the story is, frankly, a heck of a lot more convincing than the mainstream take..So here's a shot of the book, and let's get into it. You got involved in activism, and you make it clear you had three main issues: Free speech, save the Robert E. Lee monument in your home town of Charlottesville, and “it's OK to be white.” And those three issues kind of come together. So let’s talk about how you took up those issues.Sure. So it was a long process. I started out actually on the left, but not really today's left. It was more about being anti-war. I opposed the Iraq war during the George W. Bush presidency. But during the Obama administration, things started to become very racialized from my perspective, where the news sources I was relying on, like NPR and Huffington Post, seemed to be portraying white men constantly as the bad guys. They were picking up this very politicized narrative about supposedly innocent black men being gunned down by police. And when I would look into alternative information sources on that, I could see that these were actually hardened criminals. There were extenuating circumstances like reaching for a police officer's gun, etc. And then the reaction afterwards with black people rioting in these cities and killing people, causing property damage, it just seemed like they were just papering over that, like it didn't even matter.So it caused me to really lose faith in the left and start to move towards something else, which is where I'm at now, which is not really liberal or conservative, but my primary issue is... that white people are under attack.You were an Obama voter. So it's not like you came into this whole thing with some kind of racial animus, right?No, I, and still to this day, I don't really harbor like hate in my heart or whatever. I say controversial things online sometimes because the reaction to even tepid race realism is so over the top. If you're a free speech guy, at a certain point, you're just like, “screw it. Sometimes I'm just going to say very controversial things because I don't like people telling me what I can and can't say.”That makes sense to me. And I can kind of see how you pull all these things together, because to my mind, one of the good things about our American heritage is the First Amendment. We can hash out our differences without shooting at each other, which a lot of Americans did back in the day, but it's always better to hash it out by arguing, and that's what we're supposed to be able to do. But we really can't so much any more. I think you make a good argument in this book that free speech died in Charlottesville. You quote Hunter S. Thompson. In Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas he has that famous line about how this whole protest anti-Vietnam hippie thing, the wave crested and then it rolled back. And you stand here halfway to Las Vegas or whatever, and you can see where the wave rolled back. And we can kind of see the wave of free speech rolling back. I keep asking, when did the internet suddenly become totally censored, or when did they start? When did the whole thing change? And it's obviously in the mid—like 2016-ish, 2017-ish, but I think you're right. I think and Charlottesville might be the key moment.Yeah, I talk a little bit about the aftermath of Charlottesville and how free speech has been affected. There are obviously still some battlegrounds going on in free speech with the online discussion and Elon Musk buying Twitter. So people are still fighting for their right to be able to speak online. But Charlottesville was certainly the death of the ability of people to have unrestricted access to the public square to air their grievances. Because in Charlottesville, you just had an unthinkable situation where someone like myself, who believed in these ACLU free speech cases, who believed in the free speech movement that began in Berkeley, California i

Press TV Rumble linkHello and welcome to Press TV Spotlight. I'm Marcia Hashemi. Thanks so much for being with us. The leader of Iran's Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has said that due to Al-Aqsa flood operation, the issue of Palestine is the primary issue in the world today. He was speaking at a gathering commemorating the 35th anniversary of the passing away of the founder of the Islamic Revolution, Imam Khomeini. Ayatollah Khamenei also reflected on Imam Khomeini's steadfast support for Palestine and how his insight not only helped us understand the situation of Palestine, but Iran, the region, and the world.I'd like to welcome out of London Shabir Razvi, political analyst. Thank you so much, Shabir, for being with us. Let's start off with the world today and the world years ago, and especially what has changed. One, looking at the place of Iran, and two, looking at the Palestinian issue.Shabir Razvi: Thank you very much for the kind invitation. Of course, the world is a different place, as you quite rightly pointed out. And those of us who are of a certain age have lived through this historic moment from the time of the inception of the Islamic Revolution in 1979 and through all the contours that it has taken in the last years, particularly the sad demise of the founder and the leader of the Islamic Revolution. Imam Khomeini, may the Almighty be pleased with him and have mercy on him, was really an individual that resonated very clearly with not only the Muslims globally, but with all the oppressed people of the world.Because in reality, Imam Khomeini was a religious scholar and his sort of thinking really sort of came out from the Holy Quran and the teachings of Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him and his family. So the reality is that whatever issues that Imam Khomeini wanted to deal with were in light of what Islam has taught humanity. The two key principles from the Quranic point of view are—I'll use the Arabic word and translate it for your esteemed audience—is to be really fighting against the mustakbireen (arrogant powers) and to be with the oppressed people, the mustazafeen.So this is the sort of divine message that Imam Khomeini was able to present to the world. Hence the reason why as soon as the Islamic revolution came on the horizon, it discontinued the relationship with the apartheid regime in South Africa, and gave the Zionist embassy in Tehran to the Palestinians, and of course took the cause of the Palestinians to the forefront—the pivot, the foundation of really supporting the oppressed people in that manner.I was lucky and very privileged to have participated in the funeral of Imam Khomeini years ago. And at that time, it was June, very hot weather, and people walked from many cities close by to Tehran to participate. It was the largest funeral that was ever held (10 million people, one-sixth of Iran’s population.) And I don't think any other funeral has come close to it in the last years or prior to it.So that really showed the love that the Iranian nation had for the founder of the Islamic Revolution. Years later, what we see is that Iran is no longer a weak country. Iran has developed in all walks of life, from military activities to technology, science, manpower building. Iran has been successful in so many fields, considering that it has been under sanctions for the last years, sanctions which have created huge problems for the ordinary people. But nonetheless, it is educating the people. It has sort of become a power in West Asia without any doubt at all. Even the foes of the Islamic revolution really have to acknowledge the fact that Iran, the Islamic Republic of Iran, is not a nation that can be walked over.And it's alliances which have built in the last years. One recalls that Iran had to experience the eight year imposed war by Saddam in the beginning of the revolution. Obviously, the European nations, America and its allies, wanted to destroy the infant Islamic revolution at that time, but they did not succeed.Kevin Barrett, expert in West Asian affairs out of Morocco. Kevin, thanks for being with us. Your thoughts on the leader of the revolution’s comments that due to the Al-Aqsa Storm operation, that Palestine has become the primary issue in the world. How important is this?He's absolutely right.He nailed it. He was correct in observing that prior to October 7th, the Zionists had been making serious inroads among some of the more corrupt leadership entities in the region and had managed to sideline the Palestinian issue from the consciousness of much of the world. Events were moving in a direction that without any major change could have led to a growing tacit acceptance of this genocide of Palestine that's been ongoing since 1948.And October 7th changed everything. It showed that just like Hezbollah was able to defeat the Israeli military in 2006, that the combined Palestinian resistance led by Hamas was able to inflict a tremendous strategic defeat on the Isr

Rumble link Bitchute linkIn the wake of Trump’s historic conviction, this week’s False Flag Weekly News raised the question: Could an alternative candidate actually become president? As someone who has voted for a long list of alternative candidates, including RFK Jr. in 2020, I really ought to be more excited about this year’s race. RFK Jr., my 2020 choice, is the first non-duopoly candidate since Ross Perot to poll in double digits. And then there’s Trump, whose absurd, rigged conviction on 34 felony counts adds to his credentials as someone the Establishment loves to hate.But which Establishment? Trump’s first term was run by neocons who make Joe Biden look like Mother Theresa. Today, the Zionist billionaires who are bribing universities, police, and thugs to crush campus anti-genocide protests are following Netanyahu’s marching orders and going all out to re-install Trump. If I were a paranoid conspiracy theorist, I might imagine that the real Establishment is using reverse psychology on the unruly electorate. The banksters need a blustery macho Republican president who can incite the US military to fight World War III, and Trump is the only game in town. So they stage blatantly unfair persecutions of Trump to whip up sympathy for Orange Caesar not just among his base, but also with the independent and minority voters Trump needs to win.Who is this Establishment, you ask? Fadi Lama calls them “the money power.” Mees Baaijen calls them “Glafia” (globalist mafia). Mujahid Kamran calls them “the international bankers.” James Perloff largely agrees with all three, and like Kamran uses the catchphrase New World Order. My False Flag Weekly News co-hosts sometimes violate the Dave Chappelle rule: “Two words in English language you should never say – ‘The’ and ‘Jews’.” But I don’t think the Money Power a.k.a. Glafia a.k.a. international bankers a.k.a. New World Order is an exclusively Jewish thing. It’s just a disproportionately Jewish thing. Some of the bankers aren’t Jewish. Those who are vary in their degree of devotion to Jewish tribal matters in general and Israel in particular. And of course the majority of Jews are only tangentially involved, if at all, with the usury-driven world takeover project. So as Dave Chappelle might say: “Three words in the English language you should always say — ‘not,’ ‘all,’ and ‘Jews.’”Still, it’s pretty obvious who’s really in charge. Cat McGuire explains on this week’s False Flag Weekly News:Kevin Barrett: (Elon Musk tweeted) that if Trump gets arrested, he'll be reelected in a landslide victory. And David Icke says: That's the idea.So, Cat, maybe it's not that they want to have a Biden dictatorship with Trump in jail and no more elections while they wage World War Three. Maybe they want to put Trump in office to wage World War Three. Because frankly, Cat, I don't think Biden can mobilize the kind of guys who like to go off to fight wars. He might be able to mobilize a few rainbow flag waving people of indeterminate gender, but I don't know if those people are going to win any wars for him. Whereas if Trump is in office and he's banging the war drum, he might actually get some people with a couple of grams of testosterone left in their bloodstreams to go marching after him.Cat McGuire: Right. That's a very good point. Because ultimately Trump’s for the genocide. Because he's completely controlled by our ZOG rulers. And he's not going to be doing that much different himself if he were to get in. He’s just like we saw with (Woodrow) Wilson and FDR. They ran on a peace ticket. And then once they got in, their Jewish controllers forced them to go to war.I think Trump would go to war, even though he claims not to want it. So, yeah, it could be a backhanded way…because I think they installed him just to create more Trump derangement syndrome which has made our country more divisive. So put him back in and he'll do their bidding all the while keeping our country more divided, because it's then Trump derangement syndrome on even more steroids.Kevin Barrett: When Trump was in office, that was the war party. He put in Pompeo, Bolton, Nikki Haley. All of those people are the hardcore Team B neocon war party people. And they launched the COVID bioattack on China. They nearly started World War III by assassinating General Soleimani. And I have no doubt that if Trump won in 2024 and appointed the same type of people, that would be a World War Three cabinet for sure. It would make Biden look like a peacenik.RFK Jr.: No Alternative to GenocideIf Trump might actually be the Ziocon war party’s preferred candidate, what about RFK Jr.? I wrote him in for president in 2020 as a protest vote. Why? Because he’s intelligent, articulate, right on many issues, and a living rebuke to the forces that killed his father and uncle…or so I thought at the time. But now, it seems that Hamlet has joined forces with Claudius. As I wrote in my new Crescent International article:As of June, 2024, Israel’s grad

Rumble link Bitchute linkPress TV: Joining us now for our program is John Steppling, author and commentator, joining us from Norway, and also Dr. Kevin Barrett, editor at Veterans Today, joining us out of Saidia, Morocco. Gentlemen, I'd like to welcome you both to the program.I guess we'll start there in Morocco with Dr. Kevin Barrett. Now, Dr. Barrett, I want to read also something in addition to the story. I have a little article here. It says, in the U.S., over 2,950 protesters have been arrested, including faculty members and professors, on over 60 university campuses. On May 7th protests spread across Europe as well, with mass arrests in the Netherlands, and by the 12th of May, 20 encampments had been established in the United Kingdom and across universities in Australia and Canada. This article is going up to the 12th, about 18 or 19 days ago. And as you very well know there's the UCLA arrests that took place, the 80 here. So we're well over 3,200 arrests on sixty-plus campuses just in the United States alone. What kind of impact does this have in getting the message out, doctor?Kevin Barrett: I think these students are doing the right thing strategically as well as morally, because they know that the reaction is going to be grotesquely exaggerated and actually non-strategic from the other side. What we're seeing is that these students are putting up their tents and they're putting up signs and they're behaving peacefully.And the billionaire Zionist donors to the university are going crazy. They are reacting with great stress. They're neurotic. They freak out. They immediately start pulling out all the stops to pressure the universities to get rid of these encampments. Because these billionaire Zionists, I think deep down inside, they are ashamed of the genocide that they and their tribe are committing. And so they're psychologically conflicted. So they use their enormous power to basically force the universities to do what universities never do (shut down peaceful protests).Thank you, Dr. Barrett. John Steppling, welcome to the conversation. John, just last week, the leader of Iran's Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei, said these kids are all on the right side of history, and they are now an integral part of the resistance movement front. So obviously their message is getting out. Palestinians and the Palestinian resistance has also acknowledged them. Their movement, how far does it go in isolating the Israeli regime? John Steppling: Well I think public opinion throughout the world is overwhelmingly pro-Palestinian. It's hard sometimes to remember that, because the media is controlled by Western governments and they have a firm grasp of the narrative that they want to impose on all of this. If you read the coverage of the Santa Cruz protests, the headlines are “Israel Hamas protests.” They had to get in the word Hamas, because that's a buzzword for, you know, the bogeyman, evil terrorists, etc.But all of this I think, is failing because the protests are growing no matter the heavy-handed police response, as was true in 1968, and these protests echo those anti-war protests. The police crackdown is excessive and disproportionate and often very brutal. And in this case we're seeing professors beaten, and certainly many students have been.So the message is, I think, been disseminated. People are horrified by this genocide across the world. The only place you don't see this horror is in Western governments and in many of the Arab governments. I mean, this has to constantly be reiterated. There's Sisi in Egypt, and King Abdullah in Jordan, and in the UAE Zayed bin Salman, King Mohammed in Morocco. I mean, these leaders function as... as Zionists, essentially. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkFadi Lama discusses his book Why the West Can’t Win: From Bretton Woods to a Multipolar World. Lama’s thesis is that the West, dominated by private central bankers a.k.a. “the Money Power,” has met its match in the form of the RIC (Russia-Iran-China) de facto alliance. Whereas the Money Power Empire uses slogans like liberalism and democracy to disguise its efforts to construct a one-world totalitarian plutocracy, the RIC axis supports multipolar civilizational sovereignty including the preservation of traditional collective values that bind together religions, nations, and families. According to Lama, world power trends favor RIC, which has been making rapid economic, technological, and military gains, even as the Money Power Empire loses control over energy resources.Dr. Fadi Lama is an International Adviser for the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). He is a consultant in the fields of geoeconomics, industry, SMEs and academia. Fadi received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology, an MSc in Manufacturing Technology from The City University of London, and his BE in Mechanical Engineering from the American University of Beirut.___Excerpts:Kevin Barrett: And your book does make it clear how the change in the military technology that Andrei Martinov has written about is so relevant to the fact that today the BRICS countries or the RIC, the Russia-Iran-China axis that you write about, are able to now challenge the US economically (thanks to their military power). Because we're moving into a stage of military parity, and maybe beyond parity. Fadi Lama: Tell me, what's the real balance of military power now? What parity? Economic parity or military parity?Well, I was saying we're moving into the era of military parity. Where we are in that process, I don't know.Military parity? That disappeared a long time ago. Now, there is no parity at all. The power of the RIC (Russia-Iran-China) is much greater. I will take a quote from—I think it was Larry Johnson, who stated that the US is waging war similar to having an army of cavalry in World War II.Let me put across some important facts people are not aware of. As you have noticed in the book, everything has at least two references that corroborate it. So, regarding US Army ground forces, these were finished, obliterated, in Iraq. Most people are not aware that the U.S. Army had more casualties in Iraq than in the Vietnam War. They give you the number, this funny number of whatever it is. The actual number was, until the end of March, more than the Vietnam War.What was done was like creative accounting. How do you define that in the theater?Like in Vietnam, if you went to Vietnam and you died, you were considered to be a casualty of the war. In the war on Iraq and Afghanistan, they made the definition “dead in the theater” and “dead not in the theater.” What's the dead in the theater? I gave this example many times… And the missile comes in at me and I'm pulverized. There's nothing to pick up. All the other nine are dead. Somebody's head is falling off. Another is cut into three parts or whatever the ambulance comes and picks all these parts—the helicopter ambulance or whatever, all these that were picked up are not considered dead in the theater. They died while not deployed (but rather, supposedly during evacuation or hospitalization).Another totally different angle that corroborates this is a conference that was held in the Kennedy School in Harvard about the cost ofthe Iraq and Afghanistan war. And there they cite that total number of rotated service men and women was something like 2.5 million. And those service men and women who had compensation claims due to injury were about 1.25 million, or half the total. Now calculate the deaths. One quarter…if you even, if you go to one tenth, that's 125,000.So the the the army the ground forces were obliterated. Hence Obama came up with this innovative doctrine of “leading from behind.” (Hiring mercenaries and terrorists and client states and generally using proxies. -KB) So the ground forces are gone. What do you have left? The Navy. The Navy is used to project power.After the January hit of Ain al-Assad base (Iran’s retaliation for the American assassination of General Soleimani) I show in the book the image analysis (of Iran’s bulls-eye missile strikes). And this meant that aircraft carriers were transformed from a platform for projecting power into a platform with hostages. The analysis is detailed in the book.So if an empire cannot project power, it's no longer an empire.In the 1990s they lost Venezuela, which was under their control. Russia's oil was with the oligarchs, under their control. Of the top four, only Iran was not in their control. Today, of the top four, only Saudi Arabia, number four, is mostly under their control.As you point out, Saudi Arabia is becoming less willing to obey every order they get from the empire.First they ent

Rumble link Bitchute linkCat McGuire will discuss Kevin MacDonald’s article and related topics on tomorrow’s False Flag Weekly NewsEvolutionary psychology scholar Kevin MacDonald discussers his new article “The Extreme Hyper-Ethnocentrism of Jews on Display in Israeli Attitudes Toward the Gaza War.” In it, he writes: “At least until the Gaza war, Jews have successfully depicted themselves as moral paragons and as champions of the downtrodden in the contemporary West…This Jewish pose of moral superiority is a dangerous delusion, and we must be realistic what the future holds as Whites continue to lose political power in all Western countries. When the gloves come off, there is no limit to what Jews in power may do if their present power throughout the West continues to increase. The ubiquitous multicultural propaganda of ethnic groups living in harmony throughout the West will quickly be transformed into a war of revenge for putative historical grievances that Jews harbor against the West, from the destruction of the Second Temple by the Romans to the events of World War II. This same revenge was fatal to many millions of Russians and Ukrainians. It’s the fate of the Palestinians that we are seeing unfold before our eyes.”Kevin MacDonald is a retired professor of psychology at California State University, Long Beach (CSULB), best known for his controversial application of evolutionary psychology to characterize Jewish behavior as a “group evolutionary strategy.” He is the editor of the Occidental Observer.Excerpt:Kevin Barrett: So let's talk about your new article on “The Extreme Hyper-Ethnocentrism of Jews on Display in Israeli Attitudes Toward the Gaza War.” One striking thing about your article is the serious warning that the fate of Gaza could be the fate of other countries and of the West. A lot of people, of course, would think that's exaggerated. I'm not so sure. So maybe you can elaborate on that.Kevin MacDonald: Well, every time Jews have had absolute power, as they did in the Soviet Union for years, they have exercised it brutally against their enemies. And I'm concerned that we'll see that again. And you see it if you look at the Old Testament, the injunctions and desires for genocide of these people who are their enemies. And all the Jewish religious writing saying basically that Gentiles are another species, they're below us, they're basically animals, and that sort of thing.And then you see that rhetoric regarding the Palestinians. And you will see that regarding Europeans, because if and when we lose power—we haven't lost power yet, obviously—but I'm concerned about the future because clearly the Jewish establishment is desiring more and more immigration. So it'll be a non-European country. All the Western European countries, United States, Canada, Australia, they will all be minority white countries. At some point, white people may not have enough power, political power, to really resist what is going on. And I just fear that Jewish ethics is entirely self-centered. It's sort of the interest of the group, nothing more, and completely the opposite of Western ethics, which is universalist: categorical imperatives, basically do what anybody else could do in that situation, you'd be okay with it. So it's like that sort of Western universalism, which is unique in the world, really. Other cultures tend to be very ethnocentric, and they privilege their own group. But the West has this long liberal tradition, really stemming from the Enlightenment, but in a way going back earlier than that. And I trace it back to evolutionary roots in my book on Western individualism. There's this sense that we should be universalists. It's the moral thing to do, that we should basically take care of other people and see their point of view and all that.Jewish ethics is completely foreign. You know, it's like, you don't care about what they think. And the more Orthodox you get (the more ethnocentric.) And the Orthodox have taken over Israel.Today I got this email from Jonathan Greenblatt, the head of the ADL, and he's been in Israel. He come back with this message and basically he says, “You know, what happened on October 7th was anti-Semitism.” And you always see this by the Jewish apologists, that there is no context to what happened on October 7th. There's nothing about the blockade that's been ongoing, nothing about all the oppressive policies that Israel's engaged in over the years. And what Israel's doing is absolutely destroying Gaza. It'll never really come back for years and years, if ever. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble linkIs a university professor’s job to make students regurgitate his own views? Or is it, rather, to call attention to the most noteworthy extant interpretations, and encourage students to use critical thinking to come to their own conclusions?My academic training favored the latter approach, perhaps because I was fortunate enough not to study under any egotistical academic superstars. (My dissertation advisor, the late Harold Scheub, was only a semi-superstar in the somewhat marginal field of African Languages and Literature.) But plenty of people, inside and especially outside the academy, are terrified of teachers who encourage students to think for themselves. My long-time 9/11 truth colleague Prof. Anthony Hall, who spent years being hounded by the ADL over an incriminating image that someone planted on his Facebook page, knows that better than anyone. Tony recently posted on the “Free Speech Crisis at our Universities.”Left-wing censors want students indoctrinated with the “Canadian residential school holocaust” narrative (among other holocaust narratives). They want to silence skeptics, and fire professors who “platform” them.Right-wing censors want students indoctrinated with pro-Israel narratives. They want to fire administrators and professors who have encouraged the on-campus critical thinking that produced the current wave of anti-genocide protests. These Zionist-financed ConInc inquisitors are pushing today’s version of Hannity and O’Reilly’s 2006 crusade against the 9/11 truth movement in general, and its academic wing in particular.Should professors profess only approved ideas, and force students to regurgitate them verbatim? That might be a good educational philosophy at Bill O’Reilly University. Below is the still-amusing transcript of Bill O’Reilly’s unbelievably smarmy, moronic, arrogant hectoring of two of my “Islam: Religion and Culture” students on October 11, 2006.Bill O’Reilly Interviews “Madman” Kevin Barrett’s Students Bill O’Reilly: Impact segment tonight: You may remember University of Wisconsin instructor Kevin Barrett saying that the USA attacked itself on 9/11 and that America is behind the terrorism in Iraq. That caused a great outcry, but Barrett hasn't pulled back a bit.Kevin Barrett audio clip: It's happening, you know, largely through this false flag terrorism. It looks to me like, not only 9/11, but also Madrid, the Bali hotel bombing, and probably most of these so-called Zarqawi-style bombings in Iraq are all false flag operations being carried out by a special wing of probably U.S. or Western military intelligence.Bill O’Reilly: Now this is just insane. Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle said the university should fire Barrett, but of course it's not happening. University Provost Patrick Farrell has retained Barrett, but has warned him to stop seeking publicity. However, the story doesn't end there. Barrett is now requiring his students to buy his book, which compares President Bush to Adolf Hitler. Joining us now from Madison is Molly Sessler, a student in Barrett's “Islam: Religion and Culture” class, and Jenna Pryor, the managing editor at the conservative student newspaper at UW.I'll begin with you, Ms. Pryor. You know, there comes a point where academic standards have to be held, upheld, at any major university. And here, this man runs around saying all these things with no backup, no proof, nothing. He's considered a crank and a kook by most academics. And how's it going down on the University of Wisconsin campus?Jenna Pryor: You know, you're absolutely right. And it's becoming more and more embarrassing. You know, a few years ago when I applied and was accepted to the UW, it was my number one choice because of the prestige it had not only in Wisconsin, but nationwide. And I just feel like day by day with Mr. Barrett, that prestige is slowly eroding. I mean, we have this guy saying these things, which are perfectly reasonable for his own personal opinions, but are not facts, are not peer-reviewed scientific evidence by any means, are just basically his opinions on Republicans and President Bush, and passing them off as testable knowledge in his class, forcing students to read it, forcing students to take tests on it, forcing students to repeat it. It's embarrassing. And you're absolutely right when it comes to academic standards. I mean, for other professors at the UW, it must be extremely embarrassing for them to have a peer of theirs—Bill O’Reilly: Is it embarrassing, though? Is it embarrassing? Have other professors said anything about it?Jenna Pryor: I think they are. I've seen some comments online from some other professors that are embarrassed by this. Bill O’Reilly: I don't know if that's true. I haven't seen any outcry by the university officials, the hierarchy, or the professors at all. And Ms. Sessler, you're actually taking this course. Now, why would you take a course from a guy who basically is putting forth a preposterous scenario and making statem

Rumble link Bitchute linkPress TVA UN agency has warned that an estimated 15-thousand pregnant women are among half of Gaza's population that is at the risk of an imminent famine. The United Nations Population Fund attributes the situation to the continued Israeli blockade on life-saving aid to Gaza. The UNPF said that Israel has closed the doors to humanitarian aid and opened the gates to starvation in the territory. The agency added, the catastrophe is incomprehensible and entirely avoidable. The UN and other international aid agencies have repeatedly issued such warnings to Israel but to no avail. Israeli forces on the ground have rather attacked aid workers and Palestinians waiting for food assistance on numerous occasions. According to the UN, 254 aid workers have been killed since Israel launched its war on Gaza late last year.Kevin Barrett, when you take a look at the story here, a UN agency warning about the pregnant women, that's a headline in itself. And then you have the fact that they're at risk of famine. That's another headline. I'm looking at this pier that the U.S. built, which I believe a quarter of it is now broken off and sailed off into Ashdod. Isn't that reflective of the type of disconnect from reality of the depth of the situation that the U.S. is in when it comes to how it could stop all of this from happening? We're giving up hope on the Israeli regime, by the way.Kevin Barrett: Yes, the U.S. is showing complete incompetence or really much worse. It's actually showing that it is participating with genocidal intent in this genocidal campaign against Gaza. The pier breaking off does symbolize that incompetence, but just building the pier in the first place was obviously not really designed to deal with this situation. The United States could stop this catastrophe instantly with one phone call from the Biden White House ordering the Israelis to stop their genocide campaign, with the threat of everything that the United States could do to Israel theoretically, up to and including declaring war on this genocidal state as part of a relief operation. The United States theoretically could do all sorts of things.But wouldn't have to go nearly that far. All it would have to do is threaten a reversal of longstanding U.S. support for Israel and a complete cessation of any funding and diplomatic efforts, and to support Palestine instead of Israel. The United States is supposed to be a sovereign country and theoretically could do all of those things. But instead, because the United States has been taken over by this neoconservative Zionist wing of foreign policy thinkers who are basically loyal to the extreme expansionist designs of the Likudniks in Israel, the United States has been completely complicit and has simply done these PR stunts, such as building a pier that just breaks off. Even if the pier were functioning, it wouldn't come even close to stopping this famine that, as we heard, is threatening the pregnant women of Gaza with utter starvation. The pier wouldn't fix that, even if it were functioning. It would at most allow a small proportion of what's needed in.What's needed is to open the Rafah border crossing. There's plenty of aid waiting there. And the Israelis are blocking that. And the Americans can tell them to open it up any time that the United States wants to. But it apparently doesn't want to, making US leaders equally complicit in genocide. And this genocide campaign is deliberately targeting women and children. The Israelis have been very clear and blunt about this for years,that they are targeting Palestinian women and children. The IDF soldiers proudly wear one-shot, two-kills T-shirts showing an image of a pregnant Palestinian woman with a target on her belly. And Ayelet Sheked, the minister in Israel, has called for Israel to exterminate the so-called little snakes, meaning Palestinian children, as well as the mothers who bear them. And these are just a couple of examples of the clear genocidal intent to exterminate Palestinian women and children coming from the entire leadership class of the state of Israel, supported by the entire leadership class of the United States of America. Both of those leadership classes need to be arrested and put on trial for genocide, convicted and executed.We know that the ICJ in particular and also the ICC now have obviously zoomed in on the Israeli regime in terms of issuing statements and condemnations, the latest from the ICC in terms of the arrest warrants. But don't you think that the focus should also be on the U.S.? If Israel is executing and is the gun that's shooting, the U.S. is providing the bullets. So shouldn't the U.S. also be held accountable in that respect and the focus to be on the U.S. ?Sakina Dattoo: The U.S. is obviously accountable. However, expecting the U.S. to do anything to stop this genocide, I think, is asking too much. The U.S. is not an independent country anymore. It is run and controlled by the AIPAC, which

Rumble link Bitchute link FFWN post with links and information on E. Michael Jones’ “Dangers of Beauty” conference The world stands aghast as the genocidal Zionist entity lashes out in its death throes, inflicting pointless mayhem on the civilians of Palestine and the leadership of Iran. And a collective global reaction is setting in. The International Criminal Court is seeking an arrest warrant for Netanyahu, the International Court of Justice has ordered Israel to withdraw from Rafah, and European countries are lining up to join the rest of the world in recognizing the state of Palestine.Could the rebirth of the nation of Palestine coincide with, and signify, a re-emergence of morality in world affairs? That would be no small change. As False Flag Weekly News co-host and Culture Wars editor Dr. E. Michael Jones notes, the rulers of the Anglo-Zionist Empire believe that “truth is the opinion of the powerful”—and hold the same view of morality. That view is not entirely unfounded, since those rulers have long enjoyed sufficient power to impose their versions of truth and morality on the world. If the Jewish-Protestant American empire is “a preacher with a gun,” as Dr. Jones says, it has been preaching lies at gunpoint at least since it sanctified and immortalized war propaganda in the form of the sacred Holocaust narrative after World War II. With the demise of the Soviet Union in 1989, the empire’s capacity to enshrine lies with force became virtually limitless. Truth and morality became, for all practical purposes, whatever the lying, immoral managers of empire said they were. Karl Rove famously mocked those who failed to notice this transition as “the reality-based community” and boasted (no doubt with a nod and a wink to the absurdity of the official story of 9/11) that “we create our own reality now.” (And our own morality with it, no doubt.)The Zionists have gone the furthest in calling lies truth, and morality whatever they can get away with. While planning and perpetrating genocide for more than a century, and inflicting the most sadistic, unspeakable, often strategically superfluous tortures on anyone who gets in their way, the Zionists have cast themselves as quintessential victims. That long-running ruse, however, has reached its expiration date. With the genocide of Gaza, the mask has come off. The psychopathic serial killer has been unveiled.Though the neocon Zionists still control the US empire, that empire no longer dominates the world the way it did just a decade ago. The Zionists have run it into the ground. By staging 9/11 as the PR launch for $7 trillion worth of criminal wars for Israel, the neocons hollowed out the US, rendering it morally as well as fiscally bankrupt, and diverting its attention from the economic rise of China, Russia, and other independent powers. So why will the emerging multipolar world coincide with a return to morality? Because human beings are moral creatures. Like many other animals only more so, humans have an innate moral sense and experience shock, outrage, and the need to take action when moral norms are violated. Those natural reactions can be temporarily suppressed under certain conditions, notably pathocratic tyranny. And that is what we have been living under: the “absolute power corrupts absolutely” regime of the self-styled unipolar hegemon. As it comes apart, global power will become a complex process of negotiation involving many stakeholders, who will regularly appeal to the moral sense of their negotiating partners and adversaries. Revenge for the Gaza Genocide: What Would Zionist-Style “Proportionality” Look Like?The need for negotiations based on shared commitment to win-win outcomes, informed by universal morality rather than tribal egotism, may be illustrated by considering the alternative: an endless cycle of vengeance featuring ever-more-lethal technologies. Specifically, how might this play out in the Zionism-versus-Palestine conflict?Prior to the October 7 al-Aqsa Storm raid, Israel had been steadily killing Palestinians, by the thousands, for decades. Palestinian retaliation had been relatively minor by comparison, inflicting less than 10% of the deaths and casualties on Israelis that the Zionists had inflicted on them. The Al-Aqsa Storm concentration camp breakout killed about 1100 Israelis, roughly half of whom were active military, police, or security. Israel responded by indiscriminately flattening most of Gaza. As I write, the official Gaza death toll is over 36,000, meaning bodies extracted from rubble and identified, while unofficial estimates of the total dead exceed 200,000. Virtually all the Gaza victims are civilians, two thirds being women and children.As a conservative estimate, Israel’s genocidal “retaliation” has killed 60 times as many civilians as died on October 7th (the majority of whom were probably killed by Israeli forces, not by Hamas). So if Palestine were to “retaliate” against Israel in the same way that Israel “r

Rumble link Bitchute linkRichard Gage, AIA, is best known for his work on controlled demolitions at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. Recently he has taken an interest in questions about what really happened during the Palestinian Resistance’s Al-Aqsa Storm operation on October 7, including speculation about Israeli foreknowledge. Richard has been invited to speak at the Red Pill Expo in Rapid City South Dakota on June 15/16 on “Gaza: the astounding parallels with 911.”For my take on the limitations of Richard’s thesis, see “9/11 and October 7: Parallels—and Stark Differences.”Excerpt:Richard Gage: There are parallels…astounding parallels of Gaza and 9/11. And yeah, let's do get into it. I'll share my screen and we'll see what we can learn in addition to what you have shared. And maybe we'll find that what you have said is corroborated, Kevin.One thing we... It takes courage to look at these facts, whether it's 9/11 or Gaza, because the facts betray common knowledge and official narratives and our own cognitive dissonance. We've all had to overcome our worldview, me certainly as an architect, confronting the hellscape of three skyscrapers coming down to with almost 3000 people in them. So yeah, we're going to be taking a deep dive and finding out what these parallels are and who's complicit.This nine 11 moment of Israel's: Curiously, in the context of what you've said, they had a bit of their own 9-11 moment back in 2001 as well. These events forced radical changes politically, economically, and geopolitically. So we have to ask the question, were these the intended outcomes, and the process through which they were derived an artificial one? That's what we're gonna be looking at today.We have to look for patterns, connect the dots, and ask questions fearlessly. Questions like, what always follows these types of events? There's a common denominator, war: an intended outcome. What triggers war historically? False flag events.Let's look at false flag events: A political or military action that's made to appear to have been carried out by a group that's not actually responsible. This is actually in the dictionary. This isn't conspiracy theory lore. This is well documented. Academic Lance de Haven Smith defines something even greater in terms of scope: State crimes against democracy, SCADs. In contrast to conspiracy theories, he says, which speculate about each suspicious event in isolation, the SCAD construct delineates a general category of criminality and calls for crimes that fit this category to be examined comparatively. SCADs often appear where presidential politics and foreign policy intersect. SCADs differ from earlier forms of political corruption in that they frequentlySCADs differ from earlier forms of political corruption in that they frequently involve political, military, and/or economic elites at the very highest levels of the social and political order.So do the events of 9-11 and Gaza share any of these SCAD features? It turns out that they do. Because what they do is they create a problem, right? And part of that is parallel number one, previously established geostrategic goals coveting the natural resources of the target territory.There's one part of a SCAD parallel to a rich history of recent and historic false flag operations.Parallel three, politically useful controlled patsies. This is where Kevin and I will have some disagreement and some discussion on this. (Unlike Hamas and its Resistance partners, Al-Qaeda was a purely synthetic patsy, not a legitimate resistance group. -KB)Parallel four, a triggering event, an innovative attack with dubious origins, a manufactured invasion from foreign operatives.Parallel five, a catastrophic intelligence failure,Parallel six, a military stand down with an obvious uncharacteristic delay in response.Parallel seven, foreknowledge of the attacks.Parallel eight, uncontrolled delight during the attacks, i.e. dancing Israelis on 9/11.Kevin Barrett: Wait, Richard, were there dancing Israelis on October 7th too?Richard Gage: Yes, and I'm going to show them to you... This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Bitchute link Rumble link For more on this topic check out tomorrow’s False Flag Weekly News with E. Michael JonesOn-scene reporting specialist Brett Redmayne-Titley discusses his new article “UC’s War For Your Mind?: Students Defeat Cops in Opening Battle.” It provides an in-depth look at one of the more than 100 protests/encampments that have sprung up on American campuses protesting the genocide of Gaza: “On the weekend of April 27, 2024, UC/ San Diego campus administrators got wind that Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) was going to set up an ‘encampment’ at a point yet unknown. They had been waiting for this opening salvo of the constant of conscience and its visual appeal—tents—to finally come to their campus. For months, they had previously been summoned to meetings at UC Davis, UC Los Angeles, and UC Berkeley to, in part and priority, address the growing student awakening…And how to stop it.”Brett Redmayne-Titley is the author of THERE! On-Scene Reporting from a World Gone Mad.: From Ukraine to Moldova, Erdogan’s Turkey to Hizbullah’s Lebanon, the US Police Killing of Evan Quik and Further Down the Rabbit Hole of Media Lies. His work is archived at WatchingRomeBurn.uk.The interview begins:B R-T: We're dealing with a very moral issue here, one that I coined as the constant of conscience. I think that anyone who has the constant of conscience understands that this is indeed genocide and it has to stop. Certainly the ICJ this morning said the same thing. We're going to see the same thing from the ICC very shortly. But the students are ahead of the curve. In my articles, I use the analogy to Occupy, which as you probably remember, Kevin, I was very well invested in, actually living in the camps with the protesters, writing many articles. I believe I wrote more about Occupy than any other journalist in America because I was so invested in the organization and was very enthusiastic about it. It was a grassroots organization that was indeed really all-inclusive. And the all-inclusive nature of it sold itself to the general public. It was why Obama ruined and destroyed the camps. The camps, just like they are today at the universities, are a means of coalescence against genocide. And because it's very effective as a visual means of protest and a visual means of coalescing further in additional protests, the administration is furious, as they are about the ICJ decision. today.We're not allowed to protest genocide. We're merely allowed to accept this new definition that's being pro-offered to the students and forced down their throats, regardless of the realities in Gaza.I've been privy to a lot of what's taken place at an administrative level, and I'm afraid I cannot disclose how I'm able to do that. I can just assure your listeners that my information does come from the sources at the administrative level. Collectively, I can say that the administration doesn't give a damn about the students and their protests. They want it to stop now because they're getting their orders from the UC Regents Office, and the UC Regents Office is fervently, vociferously Zionist. And they want this to stop because it will coalesce into the streets soon with the American people now rising up against the genocide. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble linkThe massive turnout across Iran mourning the martyred president Ebrahim Raisi exposed the lies of Zionist-owned Western media, which absurdly claimed Raisi was unpopular in his own country. Compare the turnout at Raisi's funeral to what would happen if Joe Biden fell down the Air Force One stairs and hit his head and died and had a funeral. Would even Biden's dog show up? Six years ago I spoke at a conference in Iran headlined by Ebrahim Raisi. That was three years before he was elected president. When I got a chance to shake his hand, little did I know that I was shaking hands with a future president and martyr. Here are a couple of pictures from that event.Below is my 5-22-24 interview with the Islamic Republic of Iran News Network.IRINN: As the first question, what's your assessment of the funeral for Iran's martyred president? Yesterday it was in Tabriz and Qom, and today we had a funeral in Tehran. Millions of people pulled out to the streets for the funeral. What signal does this image send to the world?Kevin Barrett: Well, this informs the world that the Western media is mean-spirited and lying in their coverage of everything having to do with the Islamic Republic of Iran. The Western media has done everything it can to try to darken the name of these martyrs and insult them. They've made up all kinds of slanderous reports and tried to claim that Iranians don't love their martyred leaders. And these images prove the contrary. We see huge crowds. In fact, even Western media, when they covered (the huge funeral processions)—and they're having a hard time covering this because it contradicts the false narrative that they've been portraying. But they have had to use words like “huge crowds, overwhelming crowds.” They try to downplay the numbers, but they ultimately fail.And the reason for this is that the Western propaganda machine is living in a bubble of its own creation of false facts and misinformation. And clearly, the Iranian nation loved and mourns these martyrs, President Raisi and Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian. And I can promise you that if Joe Biden's helicopter crashed, that there would not be a crowd remotely like that, because Americans only vote for Biden because they hate Trump worse.So this has essentially exposed the Western media as a group of pathological liars, and they are now regrouping and licking their wounds.As an external observer of the endurance of all these hardships for the Iranian nation, you've seen those sanctions, assassinations, wars, and other incidents, including those in recent years (including) the maximum pressure campaign by the United States and also Joe Biden's pressure on the Iranian government.But after the Iranian president dies, the people of Iran come to the streets in millions. How do you see this tolerance and this endurance of the Iranian nation?The Iranian nation is playing a heroic role on the world stage. It is standing up for the people of Palestine in a way that no other major nation has done. And it's leading the forces pushing for a more just multipolar world. And these positions expose the leaders of Iran and some of the people of Iran—scientists, ordinary people who get caught up in the terror attacks backed by the Western powers—it exposes Iranians to danger.But the people of Iran are part of a great Islamic culture that ultimately fears displeasing God more than it fears death. And the Quran in Surah Al-Baqarah tells us, “never say that those martyred in the cause of God are dead. In fact, they are alive, but you don't perceive it.”And that understanding permeates the Islamic Republic of Iran.And therefore, these brave leaders like President Raisi and others that we know were assassinated, like General Zahedi and general, Muhammad Hadi Haji Rahimi, who the Zionists boasted about killing—there's a long list of martyrs going back to the establishment of the Islamic Republic. And that's a tribute to the Iranian nation's willingness to stand up for what's right, even if it puts themselves at risk.And again, all true Muslims feel that way. That is, dying in the cause of God for doing the right thing is the best possible way to die. And so all we can say is that we have to admire the spirit and the true faith and piety of the Islamic Republic of Iran and its leadership. And we have to feel the same way about the people of Iran, who are all willing to accept these risks that come with doing the right thing and supporting a leadership that does the right thing, and who come out by the millions to mourn when their leaders are martyred.And the last question: One of the dimensions of the recent developments has been the reactions of different countries to the death of President Raisi and Amir Abdullahi. And today over close to 60 foreign delegations attended Tehran to pay tribute to them. What do you think about this dimension?It's wonderful to see the new multipolar world emerging with more and more nations courageous enough to st

Below is a slightly condensed and edited transcript of today’s interview with Richie Allen.Richie Allen: The Israelis say, “not us, we didn't do it.” I'm inclined to not know what to think. I'm looking for motivation. And I'm thinking, well, Khamenei will just find another guy like the president and nothing will change. What say you?Kevin Barrett: Well, I think Israel did it, Richie, and they are the world's most outrageous psychopathic liars. So anything they deny can be taken as confirmation.Richie Allen: But have you any proof that Israel did it?Kevin Barrett: Of course not. That's way above my pay grade.Richie Allen: You know, I'm not being silly or childish when I ask that. But, you know, Israel has been blamed for it. from everything from September the 11th— Kevin Barrett: Which they did.Richie Allen: —to the (7/7/2005) bombings in London—Kevin Barrett: Which they did.Richie Allen: —to guys slipping on banana skins in Manchester on a Saturday night coming out of the pub.Kevin Barrett: I’m not so sure about that one.Richie Allen: They will say, where's the proof and where's the motivation? What do we have to gain by killing the Iranian president? What would they gain?Kevin Barrett: Well, they're extremely desperate right now. Their genocide in Gaza is getting them nowhere. They've fallen into a trap of their own making through the crazed rage that was their response to the very successful raid by Hamas on October 7th. And so they've been busily slaughtering women and children ever since, but they're still losing the military fight. And the world has turned against them. Netanyahu in particular and his faction will only stay in power if they can keep this war getting bigger and bigger and bigger.And Iran is their major adversary. They've been trying to drag the United States into an all-out war with Iran since 9/11, which was designed to take out seven countries in five years. And by far the most important was number seven, Iran. And they tried everything from stealing American nuclear weapons with the complicity of then Vice President Dick Cheney towards the end of the Bush-Cheney regime—They've tried everything in the book.And now Netanyahu and his friends are going down. They need to turn this into World War III. They need to drag the U.S. into their war against Iran. And by murdering the Iranian president, they guarantee that Iran, once it determines that that's what happened, is going to have to retaliate. And that, of course, could be spun as the provocation that leads to the war.Richie Allen: Why are we not hearing from any sources inside the Iranian government that there is a belief that Israel was involved? Because it usually doesn't take them too long to come out and throw accusations at Israel. So why have they taken so long? Why haven't we heard from somebody in officialdom there, Kevin? Why not now?Kevin Barrett: Well, they're probably weighing their options. What they've said is that they've called it martyrdom. Now, you're not a martyr if you just die in a crash. You're a martyr if somebody kills you. So they have already essentially stated that the enemy or the enemies of Iran did this, by calling it a martyrdom.As far as making it more explicit and calling out Israel directly, well, that's all-out war. And they're going to have to figure out how to make the war happen or do their retaliation in a way that works for them. If they announce it right now, then they're obligated to strike Israel instantly. And then Israel, of course, knows that, and they'll probably strike Iran first. And that may not be the best way for Iran to win the war.Richie Allen: I heard a pro-Iranian commentator on BBC Radio this morning, and he made two very interesting points. So the weather and visibility was really bad. That's number one. But number two, he lamented the fact that the economic sanctions on Iran have been so severe in recent years. And I don't agree with them, of course. That's just my opinion. But they can even impact on things like aeronautical safety—airplane travel safety and helicopter safety. And he seemed satisfied that it was the weather and maybe, just maybe, the helicopter itself wasn't up to scratch. That's a fair point. We can't discount that, right?Kevin Barrett: When people blame things like this (on the weather)—for instance, when Paul Wellstone's plane went down in 2002…Richie Allen: Remind us about Paul Wellstone.Kevin Barrett: Paul Wellstone was a great Jewish-American hero. He was a senator from Minnesota, and he was a friend of my then senator from Wisconsin, Russ Feingold, another relatively decent Jewish political leader in the United States. Wellstone was the bravest political leader in the United States. He had dedicated himself publicly to stopping the Bush-Cheney regime's war on Iraq, and he had privately been determined to investigate 9/11, to get to the truth. He knew the official story was false. And Cheney threatened him, told him to back down or there would be the mo

Rumble linkProf. Anthony Hall returns to discuss his new article “Grave Error on Alleged Mass Graves in Canada.” Excerpt: “In recent months mass graves were created along with the Israeli occupation and destruction of hospitals in Gaza. These grave sites are being dug up between rounds of Israeli bombing of Palestinian civilians. The evidence of mutilated humans coming out of Gaza’s mass graves have reportedly contained evidence of organ removal, handcuffing of doctors and patients, as well as point-blank executions including shots to the head.”Did anything remotely similar happen in Canadian residential schools? The book Grave Error: How the Media Misled Us (and the Truth About Residential Schools) says “no.” Prof. Hall, an expert on indigenous issues, tentatively concurs: :“The authors of Grave Error’s prove that a solid evidentiary basis has not been established to support the new thesis that mass murder and mass graves constitute an integral part of the history of Indian residential schools in Canada. I do not agree, however, that these findings preclude the need to look at the possible role of various forms of genocidal activity in the transformation of northern North America from pre-Columbian times to the Canada that exists today.”Is the cancelation of “mass grave deniers” like Frances Widdowson a threat to academic freedom? Tune in and see what Tony Hall thinks.From the interview:Anthony Hall: In Canada, Indian people had treaty agreements with the Crown that they would have education provided. By the late 1800s and throughout much of the 20th century, this education was provided in schools where Indian people lived. And then it started to come out a couple of decades ago that a lot of child abuse happened in these institutions, that there were rapes and just very ghastly things that happened.But it took a leap forward in 2021, when there was an announcement that mass graves had been discovered adjacent to the Kamloops Indian Residential School. And mass graves—we see the implications in Gaza. Mass graves often point to genocide.And suddenly there is this conception put out, and it was very quickly adopted by the government, by the media, that this was in fact true. And of course, if there are mass graves, unmarked mass graves, there's mass murder to go with it—secretive, surreptitious murder. So suddenly the record of Canadian history—and certainly, you know, one of the obvious dark spots in Canadian history, like every other New World country, is the treatment of Indigenous people And we see this in Gaza, where there's this phrase called settler colonialism.And so there was a very quick jumping on the bandwagon. What had happened at the Kamloops Indian Band was the chief had made an announcement, had done some kind of ground-penetrating radar, and something had showed up. Now, ground-penetrating radar isn't like doing an X-ray, where you see outlines of specific things. There was evidence that something was under the ground in this area, but that's it.But somehow it was just announced that a mass grave had been discovered. And lo and behold, the New York Times is covering it, the Washington Post is covering it. Every media outlet is covering it. Next thing you know, Trudeau shows up, starts handing out money. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkLast Wednesday, May 15, Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico was shot five times as he emerged from a government meeting in Handlova, 90 miles from the capital Bratislava. Western mainstream media united in labeling the would-be assassin a “lone wolf,” echoing the phrase of Interior Minister Matus Sutaj Estok at the post-shooting press conference.Skeptics quickly noted that Fico was the sort of leader that powerful forces might want to eliminate. The anti-Russian site Meduza seemingly agreed: “Since Robert Fico assumed his fourth term as Slovakia’s Prime Minister in October 2023, he has called Ukraine ‘one of the most corrupt countries in the world,’ stopped arms shipments to Ukraine’s Armed Forces, and promised to block E.U. aid to Kyiv.” The article approvingly cited expert opinion that Fico’s “statements about Ukraine mobilize radical segments of society.” Western mainstream media has been promoting the same theme, implying that the “radicalization” behind the shooting was Fico’s own fault.Additionally, COVID dissident Meryl Nass noted that Fico is “ the first head of state in 2024 to openly reject the WHO’s 2 treaties…Remember too, Tedros was just in Slovakia to try and turn Mr. Fico.” Those who see the World Health Organization’s push for pandemic treaties as a back door to world government are naturally suspicious. They also note that Fico, following Hungary’s Victor Orban, is anti-immigration as well as anti-Ukraine-war.Maybe it’s just a coincidence that a rare European assassination attempt happened to target a leader viewed as problematic by Deep State elites. The would-be assassin, a former security guard and uncelebrated versifier, might very well be a lone nut, or lone wolf, or lone poet, or lone-whatever-you-want-to-call-him.Whatever the truth about the Fico shooting, it’s undeniable that history-changing attacks dubiously attributed to lone nuts have a rich history, especially in Eastern Europe. And last Wednesday, when Fico got shot, I was in the right place to meditate on that theme: The Hungarian National Museum in Budapest. The National Museum is arranged so as to present Hungary’s history from prehistoric times to the present. It’s a visual depiction, in the form of artifacts and images, of the narrative of Hungarian national identity.Hungary’s sense of identity is unusually intense, perhaps due to its peculiar language. While its ex-Yugoslav (southern Slav) neighbors quarrel in the same language—Serbs, Bosnians, Croats, and Montenegrins can understand each other, for better or worse—Hungarians speak a peculiar tongue that is not even in the Indo-European family. One of the reasons Hungary keeps electing “right-wing nationalist” Viktor Orban is a certain irredentism that grows out of the massive loss of national territory resulting from choosing the wrong side in the 20th century’s world wars. The 1920 Treaty of Trianon left Hungary with only 28% of its pre-war territory and 36% of its pre-war population, and those borders haven’t changed much since. If we accept the official story that World War I was caused by a lone nut, or wolf, who just happened to assassinate Archduke Ferdinand, present-day Hungarians can blame one crazy “radicalized” individual, Gavrilo Princip, for the extreme truncation of what used to be their nation.But the famous assassination of the Archduke wasn’t the only history-steering “lone nut” shooting in 20th century Eastern Europe attributed to a radical Serb. Another was the 1928 killing of Croatian nationalist leader Stjepan Radić, which enflamed Croatian nationalism and the factional violence that would flare up around World War II and re-emerge in the 1990s Balkan Wars. As Wikipedia explains: “Following the political crisis triggered by the shooting, in January 1929, King Aleksandar Karađorđević abolished the constitution, dissolved the parliament, banned all ethnic, regional and religious political parties, and declared a royal dictatorship.”Since the Radić shooting conveniently allowed King Aleksandar to consolidate power, “conspiracy theorists”—meaning those familiar with the phrase cui bono—have often wondered whether the king or his associates might have been behind it. When I posed that question during a guided “war tour” of Zagreb, Croatia last week, the tour guide, a local historian, noted that a great many people credit that theory, and that it did not strike her as implausible.If King Aleksandar really was behind the Radić killing, he got a taste of his own medicine six years later, when another radicalized lunatic, Vlado Chernozemski, shot the king dead in Marseille. But while Chernozemski may have been a nut, or a wolf, or a poet, or whatever, and was certainly radicalized, he wasn’t especially lonely. A professional assassin originally in the pay of Macedonian and Bulgarian terrorists, Chernozemski was convicted and imprisoned, released in 1932, and immediately went back to work as an instructor for the Croatian terrorist gr

Wyatt Peterson discusses his book Perfidy of Zion and his article “October 7 in Context.” Excerpt:“It’s difficult for non-Jews to fathom the depths of ethnic animosity towards ‘the other’ permeating the Israeli state. Both Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich — Benjamin Netanyahu’s current Ministers of National Security and Finance respectively — are outspoken supporters of Baruch Goldstein and his ‘Massacre at the Mosque.’ Ben-Gvir proudly boasts that he once had a portrait of Goldstein prominently displayed within his home, and groups of Jewish settlers continue to eulogize the mass-murdering physician during annual pilgrimages to his grave. (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburgh even wrote a book about him titled Baruch Hagaver –Baruch the Saint.) In the aftermath of Goldstein’s slaughter, Noam Federman, a spokesman for the Kach party in Israel, proclaimed, “The act itself was one of greatness. It was a great act of sanctifying the Name (of God).” Not to be outdone, Moshe Belogorodsky, an Israeli municipal council member, was quoted by the New York Times (Mar. 4, 1994) as saying, “It says in the Talmud that when a non-Jew strikes a Jew it’s as if he’s striking the Divine Presence itself…What Baruch did, at least in my book, is the opposite. It’s the sanctification of God’s name.”“Wyatt Peterson is a musician and full time researcher of the global criminal enterprise that has hijacked America and the wider western world. Born and raised in the northeast United States, he was a high school student when the 9-11 attacks occurred, an event that would significantly shape his worldview and lead to a lifelong interest in unraveling the interconnected web responsible for such events. His debut book Perfidy of Zion is a concise deconstruction of September 11th and other politically motivated Zionist crimes. (Email him to get a copy.) Wyatt maintains a blog called A Second Look and his writings have been featured on websites such as Rense.com and Natural News.”Excerpt from the interview:Wyatt Peterson: I've been following your work for many years, so it's really an honor to be here with you today. 9/11 was a big event for me. I was in high school at the time, And that was the one that sort of rerouted me to the path I'm on now. I grew up in a classically liberal household, and my father was very involved in activism—in particular, the Leonard Peltier case. Leonard Peltier was an Oglala Sioux Native American who was convicted for the murder of two FBI agents on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota in 1975. And my father actually wrote a book about it in 1994 called Aim on Target: The FBI's War on Leonard Peltier and the American Indian Movement.So he was always thinking outside the box, and he really instilled in me the ability to question authority. He had books by Jim Marrs. He had his book on the Kennedy assassination, Crossfire, and books of similar themes. So I grew up questioning the pronouncements of officialdom.So when 9/11 happened, it never sat well with me. But I was young at the time, so I didn't really start questioning it till about 2004. A friend of mine showed me a documentary. I think it was by Thierry Meyssan, and it involved the Pentagon and some of the anomalies surrounding the Pentagon attack.And so that first pricked my conscience. I said, okay, something isn't right here. But I sort of put it on the back burner. I was a young man. I was involved in music. I was playing in a couple bands that had just started playing out. So it wasn't until about 2007 that I watched Loose Change for the first time, and that was really when the penny dropped for me. That was when I realized we'd been lied to, and I started consuming all the information I could on it. But for a while, I was sort of spinning my tires. I read Michael Rupert's book, and he gets into peak oil. The idea that 9/11 was an operation by Dick Cheney and George Bush to launch a war for oil just didn't really add up to me. So it wasn't until a couple of years later that I came across the work of Christopher Bollyn. And when I understood the Zionist element to the 9/11 attack, that's when it really started to make more sense. It's kind of become a pursuit of mine. I read a lot and recently I've started to write because I don't want to just read all these books and keep the information to myself.—I think if you look at what's going on in America right now, the way that they're pumping up the right wing to support what I think is going to be more wars for Israel. And I think this point is lost on a lot of people on the right, Trump supporters in particular, because they don't understand the way that international Jewry works through left and right.So I think that Trump is probably their pick this time around because we're on a war footing now. And if you're trying to mobilize American support for more wars for Israel, to go into Iran, to fight Hezbollah, you're not going to be able to do that through the Democratic Party.So I think a lot of what we're

Rumble linkRyan Cristián, founder of The Last American Vagabond, makes his Truth Jihad Radio debut. (We were introduced by Richie Allen.) We begin with Ryan telling us how he discovered the authorities were lying about a long list of issues, and then move on to the escalating pro-Palestine protests—and Netanyahu’s move to escalate the genocide in Rafah.Excerpt:Ryan Cristian: I can never argue I know what the Zionists are thinking. We're not ridiculous like the corporate media, so I wouldn't make that claim. But what I think is interesting is that I think you can make a very clear case for the fact that at least some of these (Zionists) – the level of the Smotrich and Ben-Gavirs, the real extreme elements, are trying to manufacture the very reason for why they argue Zionism should exist (the perception that anti-Semitism justifies a Jewish state)…. because we have all been talking about the false allegations of anti-Semitism. Racism exists. Nobody would argue otherwise. But clearly,the allegations of anti-Semitism toward people who are simply criticizing Israel's crimes are ridiculous. And anybody with any integrity can make that point.And so that over the years that has fallen apart. People started to understand that… let's put it this way. The Palestinian resistance movement, political or otherwise, was gaining momentum in the world. People were recognizing, yes, there was a Palestine. No, they're not all terrorists. Like really basic things.And so I think that one of the the necessities of Zionism is to create the illusion that all Jews in the world are at risk without the terrorism of the Zionist state of Israel. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble linkFalse Flag Weekly News co-host Cat McGuire says the Antisemitism Awareness Act is a coup, while Kevin Barrett opines that it is an act of ritual degradation by Israeli-owned "American" legislators.We also discuss the E. Michael Jones “Dangers of Beauty” conference taking place beside the Adriatic Sea in beautiful Croatia. The small, invitation-only conference summarizes the Western aesthetic tradition from a Catholic perspective. It’s an amazing tribute to Dr. Jones’ genius as an educator—and to his courageous and tenacious determination to speak truth to [[[power]]].Extract:Kevin Barrett:So how do we connect (the conference on beauty) to the horrific ugliness of this genocide? This genocide is full of works of art, so-called. It's just sheer uglification, as these IDF soldiers are posting videos of themselves doing just horrific war crimes. And then doing things like taking these children's clothing out of the drawers of the houses that they've destroyed and the children have been murdered. Children are slowly dying beneath the rubble. The Israeli soldiers are laughing and pulling out the children's clothing and scattering it around, taking pictures of themselves, ransacking these houses and then pissing on things and defecating on things. Of course, some of them are actually showing themselves killing people. It's just so, so ugly. They're creating works of anti-art and uglification.So what's the connection between the ideal of beauty that we're talking about in this conference and and this systematic uglification of burying 10,000s of people to die slowly beneath rubble and then bragging about it and then coming up with new cruelties, stupid cruelties, and posting them on social media? Are the Zionists are trying to excel in ugliness? What explains this?Cat McGuire:Well, I think part of it has to do with an occupation and a domination of a people, be it the Palestinian people in Israel or even we Americans here in the U.S. The US is occupied as Palestine is, only our occupation is more occluded. It isn't as direct. And so the way their occupation is playing itself out in its most extreme ugly form is a genocide. The way our occupation is playing itself out is in uglification: brutalist architecture, the green hair, and also in a form of censorship that shuts us out, that literally takes away our voice, our agency. And the biggest thing that has happened to date with that is an occupation…As their occupation in Palestine has been a genocide because it's more physical, our occupation is more sort of intellectual, if not digital. And that's why we are facing what I would call a soft coup d'etat. That soft coup d'etat is the Antisemitism Awareness Act that has just recently passed through the House and is going to probably be rubber-stamped by the Senate and passed by Biden. This is a grave danger that people don't understand because it's occluded.= This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Michael Lindsey among others has noted that non-traditionally-religious people have fewer children. Secular countries, by and large, have such low birthrates that if they don’t rise fairly soon, their people will basically go extinct. But Lindsey isn’t exactly thrilled by Malcolm Collins’ argument for a new, pro-natality designer religion. He correctly recognizes that religion isn’t just something a clever social reformer can invent. Paraphrasing Eliade: “‘This appearance of the sacred’ in the world is what unites a community around some axis of religious meaning…Religion is concerned with the given, with that which lies beyond us and beyond our control.”So does that mean Michael will sign on with Alan Sabrosky and yours truly on a project to mass-convert the West to Islam? I doubt it. Tune in and see why. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkMayday! Mayday! US liberty is going down!On Wednesday, May 1, 2024 the House of Representatives passed the “Antisemitism Awareness Act.” The bill deems a long list of ideas about history, philosophy, religion, sociology, and current events (many of them at least roughly accurate and truthful) as illegal under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. By adopting the ludicrous International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of anti-Semitism as the law of the land, the House effectively revoked the First Amendment.If the Senate and Joe “I am a Zionist” Biden approve, it will be effectively illegal to notice that:*The State of Israel is a racist endeavor. (Which is putting it mildly.)*According to the Bible, Talmud, and Qur’an, Jews plotted to kill Jesus.*Jews “control” i.e. exercise disproportionate power over the US media, financial sector, and government.*Jews as a collective or tribe bear a degree of responsibility for actions of the self-proclaimed Jewish state of Israel, where all racially-defined Jews are presumptive citizens, regardless of where they were born or currently live.*Many though not all Jews are more loyal to Israel than to their own nations.*The State of Israel, and to a degree the larger Jewish nation or tribe, has grossly exaggerated their own suffering, and minimized or denied the suffering of non-Jews (especially Germans) by way of their sacred Holocaust narrative, which they have inflicted on the Western world due to their disproportionate power. (They also minimize Persian suffering with their Purim story, and Egyptian suffering with their Passover story, but people are allowed to question those.)The above propositions are inarguable. Nobody positing the contrary could possibly win a far debate against a competent opponent. And yet, under the Antisemitism Awareness Act, all such statements, no matter how obviously true they may be, will be illegal.That the illegal statements are true, of course, is the whole point. Nobody would bother to ban ideas that can be cogently refuted. Banning the truth is the last refuge of a liar who has been exposed.I Thought Jews Were Supposed to Be Good at PRFrom a PR standpoint, the “Jewish Billionaires Ban the Truth Law” is not a smart move. Roughly 100 US college campuses, and more and more elsewhere, are being hammered with billionaire-donor-driven over-the-top repression of their peaceful anti-genocide demonstrations—a painful, bloody reminder of the reality of Jewish Power. All of those demonstrators, many of whom are Jewish, have already figured out that “the State of Israel is a racist endeavor.” And one of the reasons young Jews are disproportionately participating in the anti-genocide demonstrations is that they agree that “Jews as a collective or tribe bear a degree of responsibility for actions of the self-proclaimed Jewish state of Israel.” The students already know that they are being lied to, and that the truth has now been made illegal, regarding those two points. So what else, the students will wonder, might “they” be lying about?Any students taking Religious Studies 101 classes will learn that the Bible, Talmud, and Qur’an all assert that Jews plotted to kill Jesus. Will all the Religious Studies textbooks be rewritten to blame Hamas?This is not going to be an easy sell.The students will probably figure out the ethnicity of the billionaires who sicced the trained-in-Israel attack-cops, and the JDL thugs, on their encampments. They won’t be able to avoid noticing who owns the politicians—and just bribed them to revoke the First Amendment. With rabid Zionist Jews like Mark Levin snarling “we own this country” (meaning the USA) and threatening to deport anyone who opposes them, the notion that elite Jews dominate the US media, financial sector, and government becomes less a trope than a truism.As they start to get a sense of what they are up against, the more thoughtful students may start to wonder if the Holocaust is really the one and only thing the Constitution-shredding Jewish-Zionist billionaires are telling the truth about. Those who perform even a cursory preliminary investigation will discover that there appears to be a very good reason why debating this particular historical episode had to be made illegal.Ironically, the Antisemitism Awareness Act may succeed in raising awareness about positions deemed “anti-Semitic”—awareness of the truth of those very propositions. Presumably that is not the kind of “awareness” that the Zionist billionaires behind the Act intended.They Need a Better PR StrategyThe Jewish-Zionist billionaires’ strategy of focusing attention on the negative aspects of their culture in general, and their pet genocide project in particular, is self-defeating: “Israel is racist. Can’t say that! We rich Jews own America and can push Constitution-shredding laws through Congress. Can’t say that! We killed Jesus. Can’t say that!” That’s like if MacDonalds launched an ad campaign along the lines of: “Our

Regular “first Friday of the month” guest Dr. Alan Sabrosky, upon learning that Iraq just banned transgenderism, prostitution, and homosexuality, emailed me: “Maybe all whites should convert to Islam? Then we might well be protected from these (and other) predators. Christianity (with the partial exception of Russian/Eastern/Greek) Orthodox hasn’t done squat for Western Culture over the past century or so, at a minimum.”Me: “Not a bad idea. Or they could try to help a Christianity-friendly school of Islam take power. Muslims are required to protect Christians and their churches and monasteries.Under Muslim rule, Christians might become Christian again.”Does “Doc” Sabrosky, former Head of Strategic Studies at the US Army War College, really think that white folks should consider mass-converting to Islam? Or was he just trolling me? Tune in and find out.Excerpt:I’m broadcasting from the rooftop studio here in beautiful Morocco, where I finally got my residency card this morning, and where I've been doing my broadcasts ever since July, and will continue to do so, inshallah. Today we have another great show lined up.In the second hour, Michael Lindsey comes on for the first time. He’ll be talking about the need for pro-natality religion to save people in general and the people of the secular developed countries, including white people, in particular. However, he doesn't agree with the Malcolm Collins argument for a designer religion that would be designed to convince high IQ white people to breed like rabbits. Michael Lindsey thinks that's a pretty crazy idea, as do I.In the first hour, we're going to talk about some related issues. If you're not in favor of a designer religion to get people breeding, how about an old-fashioned religion, some old-time religion…like how about Islam? Dr. Alan Sabrosky, the former head of strategic studies at the U.S. Army War College, has said some pretty provocative things, and the latest is one of the most provocative: He suggested that white people should all mass convert to Islam. This was in response to hearing that Iraq had banned homosexuality, transgenderism, and prostitution. Dr. Alan Sabrosky, are you serious or are you just trolling me?I was a little bit serious and a little bit trolling. Actually, it was something that occurred to me as a result of a conversation with someone else a few days ago. I didn't publish anything on it, but probably after today, I won't be able to anyway. It was that organized Christian religion, with the partial exception of the Orthodox churches…whether it's evangelical Protestantism or (liberal) Protestant denominations or the Vatican, really haven't done much at all to protect Europeans and people of European heritage from the onslaught that they're facing from the left. They really haven't. I made a joking comment to someone that it was sort of interesting to look at Ireland, where neither the IRA nor the Irish Catholic Church has done much at all to protect the Irish from the great replacement and the woke world that's being thrust upon them by the left.And I said, considering that, why not consider an alternative? This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Ryan Cristian will join my radio show next week. For links to many of the stories discussed in this interview see the latest False Flag Weekly News writeup. -KBThe Richie Allen ShowAt UCLA in California overnight hundreds of protesters have now been arrested by LAPD officers. They broke down barricades to clear this protest this morning. Hundreds of people with tents had set up encampments at the university. Officers said “get out or you will be arrested.” They have carried out hundreds of arrests, tied people's hands behind their backs, put them on buses. Stun grenades were used apparently. On Tuesday, a counter pro-Israeli group assaulted a pro-Palestinian student camp before officers were called in. Similar protests are happening at campuses right across America. Let's welcome back to the show two very good friends of ours. Kevin Barrett is a former academic. He's a broadcaster, author, and researcher. You'll find him at kevinbarrett.substack.com. And Ryan Cristian is the man behind the brilliant thelastamericanvagabond.com, an independent journalist and broadcaster. Gentlemen, welcome to the program. It's great to have you on. How are you doing?Kevin Barrett: Hey, always good to be with you, Richie and Ryan. Ryan, I really love your work. I’ve got to get you on my radio show sometime.Ryan Cristian: Absolutely. And thanks, Richie, for having us on and vice versa. Right back at you, Kevin. And I'm happy to do so.Great stuff. Kevin, I'll start with Ryan today. Ryan, you're all over this. I know Kevin is. He's in Morocco. What are your thoughts? Listeners are asking me questions about these protests and how organic are they? How grassroots are they? Is there something else behind them? I mean, the glass is always half full for me. I look at them and I think, wonderful, they're standing up to their universities, they're saying “look folks don't do business with people who do business with Israel. Don't do business with the Israeli government. They're committing genocide in Gaza, it's terrible.” For me it all looks great. What do you think Ryan?Ryan Cristian: Well I think it's an important place to start and I think that one thing we have to remember, that I'm sure anybody who's been doing this long enough can attest to, is that no matter what movement, what side, what religion, what race, what country we're talking about, there will be political entities, there will be corporations—there will be entities trying to influence the outcome. And this is always the case. That does not mean that the objective of some of the people there are is invalid. But I agree with you, I think what we're seeing is a very powerful moment of unity against empire, against power, against governments. And that terrifies the hell out of these people that we're talking about. That's not to say that there's not manipulators on the ground. We can provably show open statements on Twitter by accounts that are made to do this—that they're infiltrating Palestinian protests, faking things, yelling things to get them shut down. Everyone has a different opinion on what they want to be called on the side fighting for stopping Palestinian genocide. But then I can promise you there's somebody out there that will yell a slur that they think is appropriate. But that does not mean they're all the same thing. And I think the reality here is that they're pushing back against the obvious oppression home and abroad, right?The obvious shutdown of these protests coming from people who 30 seconds ago were screaming about how this is something that should never be challenged or, whether we're talking about any other amendment shall not be infringed, they're suddenly finding a reason to do so. And I think that's an important part of all this.Thanks Ryan. Kevin, when I invited you on today, I think you said something along the lines of, “it'll be nice to come on and talk about some positive news from my country for a change.” So you're happy, like you're moved by this, I think?Kevin Barrett: Yeah, it's one of the very few good things that's happened in the United States in quite some time. Since I moved to Morocco in July, I have been just seeing one thing after another that makes me really glad I'm out of there. Now, I almost wish I were back. I saw today the front page Guardian story on the American occupations and protests, of which there are now over 120. There was a picture of the University of Wisconsin-Madison. They have an encampment on Bascom Hill. Now, that's right by where I used to do 9-11 truth teach-ins. I was out there a month's worth of days full of 9/11 truth teach-ins back in the day. And so I kind of flashed back to that when I saw this, and I saw how many people that were out there. And then they just had the cops coming in instantly and wading in and trying to shut it down quite brutally, throwing a professor on the ground. We've seen this several times now.And so these young, idealistic, left-leaning college students are learning the tr

“Lynn Margulis said about 9/11 the same sorts of things that you mentioned people like her were saying about AIDS, which is that, if this stands, it's the death of science. Reason and facts aren't going to matter anymore when something this obviously wrong is forced down everybody's throats.”Ex-MSM journalist Celia Farber was friends with the late, great biologist Lynn Margulis, who memorably wrote: “The 9/11 tragedy is the most successful and most perverse publicity stunt in the history of public relations.” Margulis, a National Medal of Science winner, stated more than once on my radio show that due to the scientific community’s tacit acceptance of the ludicrous, physically-impossible official story of 9/11, “science is dead.”So who killed science, and why? Lynn Margulis knew that 9/11 and its criminally fraudulent coverup was just an extreme example of the deep-seated corruption that has crept into the American scientific community. Another shocking example, well-known to Margulis and other scientific luminaries but largely ignored by the general public, is the long-running dispute around the causes and treatments for AIDS. Decades ago, mainstream journalist Celia Farber reported on the efforts of Lynn Margulis and so many other scientists to debunk what they saw as the scientifically-baseless insistence that “HIV causes AIDS.” Farber, and the scientists whose work she covered, were targeted by a vicious smear campaign not unlike those endured by 9/11 truth advocates.After COVID became a sort of AIDS 2.0, Farber recognized that the problem was even bigger and uglier than she had realized. That stimulated her interest in red-pill perspectives in general, and ultimately led her to accept my request for an interview. Below is a transcript of our conversation. -KBI’m on the web at kevinbarrett.substack.com. And I've had the great good fortune to talk to a lot of really wonderful, interesting people through the years—the free and independent thinkers who question dogmas about all sorts of events, 9-11 and COVID being two of the big ones. Now I'm talking with somebody who actually was around back in the days when you were allowed to question some of these things a little bit more than you are now, and even publish in the mainstream media about them.My guest today is Celia Farber. She is well known as the journalist who broke one of the biggest stories of my lifetime, which is that the official version of the AIDS epidemic is very likely wrong, or even worse. This is something I've been hearing for decades. I followed it a little bit back at the time. And later I met Lynn Margulis, the great biologist, who filled me in a little bit more.One of the cool things about doing what I do is that so many of the best people like you (Celia) have to end up on my show instead of being on 60 Minutes or something and having that huge mainstream audience that you really deserve based on the work that you've done. But I guess I can't complain. The mainstream’s loss is my gain. So where do we start? You mentioned in our pre-broadcast conversation that the AIDS situation was really a kind of a prequel to the COVID pandemic. I was sort of marginally aware of your work back in in the 80s and 90s. I did live in San Francisco from 1981 through 1993. I knew people with AIDS and I followed the discussion in the mainstream and alternative media around it, and I'm sure I did see a fair bit of your work.I got the gist of it back then. And then I reviewed it a little bit with Bobby Kennedy's book (The Real Anthony Fauci) and Ron Unz's arrticle which emphasized the AIDS aspect of Bobby Kennedy's book on COVID.So that's my background on that issue. And I'm wondering, what led you down that path of turning into the one journalist who's willing to question AIDS? I don't think you were the only one, but you were probably the leading one. So how did that happen?Yeah, it's full of, I guess I would say, what seems like fluke events. But I'll tell you how it began. So I did my first work on this in a rock magazine I would not have expected you to have been necessarily reading, Spin Magazine…I have read it. And I've read Creem and Rolling Stone. I used to read rock magazines.There you go, yeah. So Spin came out in 1985 as a contender to Rolling Stone. I guess I would say a kind of enfant terrible. It was supposed to be more edgy, more... certainly not punk, but more… willing to confront and tip sacred cows. That was part of Spin's original identity, which is why I called one day and said I'd like to come as an intern. This was as early as 1985. And one of the reasons I wanted to work there is I read their long articles, really impressive exposé pieces, by a man named Robert Keating, who later became my editor on sacred cow subjects such as Live Aid. He did a big expose of the dark secrets, the underbelly behind the PSYOP, behind Live Aid, and how it was not what it seemed, and didn't achieve what it claimed to achieve. And others similar exposés.I

Rumble link Bitchute linkWe're joined by Editor of Veterans Today, Kevin Barrett, who's joining us from Saidia. Mr. Barrett, welcome to the program. Chants of free Palestine can be heard across the globe once again. But the significance and what's unprecedented this time around is the demonstrations that are taking place across U.S. universities. This is of course something unprecedented regarding Palestinian support inside America. Talk to us about that, about these global demonstrations, how Israel has been cornered and now it's the most isolated it's ever been. And of course about the police clampdown on campuses which is being seen as a attack on freedom of expression in America.Yeah, it's interesting how this particular issue brings such quick and massive police repression. If you speak out for Palestine in the United States, the authorities are likely to come down on you, attack you, repress you, and jail you much more quickly than if you were protesting about just about any other issue. And examples of this include the protests in the United States that began at Columbia University, and have been quite ruthlessly repressed, with a large number of students actually expelled from the university for protesting.That's...maybe not entirely unprecedented. But American universities throughout my lifetime have been full of protests. And I can't recall anyone ever being expelled for protesting. And these are generally peaceful protesters too. At Ohio State University, the police arrived just an hour or two after a demonstration started, and they started arresting people almost instantly.And likewise, I think it was in Chicago, at Northwestern where something similar occurred. They changed the school rules to make tents illegal so they could quickly try to stop the pro-Palestine tent city on campus.Hundreds, if not well over a thousand by now, of American students have been arrested in these protests, which are continuing to spread like proverbial wildfire. And likewise, it seems that in France, they’ve been unable to stop them (from growing). When the first Sciences Po protest a couple of days ago was massively repressed in the typical style of Macron—though fortunately I don't think they were shooting out people's eyes with rubber bullets like he did to the Yellow Vests—that protest restarted, just today, and it's twice as big as it was a couple of days ago.So the genocide perpetrators and their enablers in the West are now facing a serious problem, because the younger generation of students across the world, including in the Western world and even in the United States, the belly of the beast, is increasingly aware about this issue. And all of their sympathies are already tending towards the Palestinians. And the more they learn about this genocide, the stronger their sympathies for the Palestinians will be. So the Zionist propaganda machine has run into a really serious roadblock. And these rallies on U.S. campuses gained more steam to protest the recent congressional approval of more military aid for the Israeli regime. About that aid package, billions of taxpayer dollars will continue to go to Israel to continue its genocide. What was your reaction to the approval of the military aid?Well, it's, of course, disgusting. It's disappointing that the Republicans caved. Their new speaker Mike Johnson changed his position and caved on the Ukraine issue. But the continued all-out support from both major parties for this genocide in Gaza is just incredibly disgusting and embarrassing. It really makes me embarrassed to be an American, to have a government that is so unanimously pro-genocide, that is paying for this genocide, enabling it, as it has been for more than half a century. But now that this genocide has switched into high gear and is being televised 24-7-365, everybody can see it on social media. Nobody can deny it anymore. That may have changed some views among younger people on college campuses and also among the general public. According to the polls, we now have in the U.S. about equal numbers of sympathizers with Palestine and with Israel. Whereas in the past, the Israeli propaganda machine had won a huge majority to its side. But that's eroded. Among the younger people, there's a very, very strong majority now favoring Palestine, indeed supporting the Palestinian resistance. And this terrifies the Zionists.So the people are coming around, especially the younger people. But the United States government is still owned by Zionist billionaires who also own the media. So there's going to have to be a big change before U.S. government policy significantly changes.Let's go over what the students are actually calling for. They want universities to divest finances from manufacturers that sell weapons to Israel. They want Washington to end its military and financial support for Israel. Those demands, as we mentioned earlier, have been met with violent crackdowns by U.S. police. Now, what's interesting is that

Rumble link Bitchute linkRon Unz discusses his new articles “Israeli Assassinations and Public Scrutiny” and “After Four Years and Thirty Million Deaths.” The former reflects on the hidden history of Israel’s outrageously bad behavior, some of which is now becoming better known in the wake of the accelerated genocide of Gaza, while the latter summarizes and updates Ron’s work on COVID, including his groundbreaking articles arguing that the pandemic emerged from a US bio-attack on China and Iran.Extract from the interview:The best way to think about it is there are really three reasonable hypotheses. The covid virus could be a natural virus. It could be a Chinese virus. Or it could be an American virus. And the problem is the entire debate, virtually 99% of the debate in the media, even more than that, has been between options one and two, a natural virus or a Chinese virus that came from the Wuhan lab. And therefore, in a sense, both of the competing camps have sometimes been talking past each other. Most of the individuals, most of the groups that advocate a natural virus, focus on the fact that there's very little evidence of any lab leak in the Wuhan lab. There's really quite a lot of evidence that the virus did not come from the Wuhan lab. And so they say that proves the virus must be a natural virus.On the other hand, the advocates of the Wuhan lab leak theory focus almost entirely on the very strong evidence that the virus was bioengineered, that it was produced in a laboratory somewhere. And by default, they assume it must have been the Wuhan lab. While on the other hand, they seem to focus very little on any evidence that the virus came from the lab.The single best eyewitness we have from the Wuhan lab, Danielle Anderson, an experienced virologist who was working at the lab at that point in time, says there's absolutely no evidence, no hints from the people she was working with, that any sort of lab leak had occurred, or any indications that they were working on that type of virus. So there really isn't any evidence for a lab leak while there's overwhelming evidence that the virus was bioengineered. And that by a vector sum, I think, leads one to the third option, which is that the virus was the result of an American bio-warfare attack against China and Iran.There's a lot of other evidence besides. For example, the fact that the two earliest outbreaks in the world, the two epicenters, were China and Iran, the two countries that America was most hostile towards. The fact that in the Crimson Contagion exercise, America's chief biowarfare advocate, Robert Kadlec, spent eight months in a major federal-state training exercise on how to prepare America. for the appearance of a COVID-like virus in China if it spread to the United States. And that exercise was concluded just a couple of months before the virus suddenly appeared in Wuhan.Or for example, the fact that the Defense Intelligence Agency produced a secret report in November 2019 saying that there was a potentially cataclysmic disease outbreak taking place in the city of Wuhan before there was any outbreak in the city of Wuhan.So, with all that evidence, none of it is basically known by most of the individuals who debate the COVID origins hypothesis on either side of the scale. And so if those facts simply became more widely known, (the case for) the virus having been produced in an American laboratory and then used in a biowarfare attack against China would simply be overwhelming.So my piece was really a long piece, but it was almost entirely recapitulation. of the arguments I've been making over four years. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkAl-Alam Arabic News Channel: A new cold war is looming. The global arms war has reached its highest levels in history. Military expenditures have reached $2 trillion $443 billion in the year 2023 across the five continents including the Middle East. These are record numbers. The Stockholm International Institute for Peace Research has revealed that the global military burden increased to 2.3% last year, with the rate of military spending as a percentage of government spending rising to 6.9%, and global military spending per capita reaching $309.Washington has allocated more than one-third of the total global military expenditure for itself, around $916 billion—the highest expenditure in the world. China ranks a distant second with about $300 billion, surpassing Russia and India, while Saudi Arabia ranked first regionally and fifth globally with $76 billion, ahead of the Israeli entity.The reports attributed this increase to the ongoing war in Ukraine, and the brutal aggression on Gaza that led to a hike in Israel's military expenditures, as well as rising geopolitical tensions in Asia, Oceania, and the Middle East.Experts see the increase in the military expenditure as a reaction to the ongoing deterioration of global security. They warn of the danger of entering a spiral of action and reaction in light of an increasingly fragile global geopolitical and security system. Will these governments be drawn into unintended conflicts as a result of this arms sale?That was our report. And we are going to the questions right now.The report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute offered some figures for 2023. The USA, for example, spent $916 billion in military spending. China, $296 billion. Russia, $109 billion. India, $83.6 billion. Saudi Arabia, $75.8 billion. The Israeli entity ranked 15th with military expenditures exceeding 27 billion dollars—a 24% increase compared to 2022 due to the brutal aggression on Gaza. Iran ranked 33rd, according to Stockholm Institute, with an expenditure of only $10 billion.We will discuss this subject with Professor Kevin Barrett. Good evening and welcome to our program. According to this report, there are two main factors in the increasing in the military budgets for those countries: The war in Ukraine and the brutal aggression on Gaza. What's the common point and the role of the United States in this phenomenon?Both the war on Russia through Ukraine and the genocidal war against Gaza and Palestine are supported by the United States empire in general, and the neoconservatives in particular. They are extremist warmongers who are dedicated to keeping the United States empire in a position of unilateral hegemony. But that is impossible because of changes in the global economy and the spread of technology.So we have a collapsing empire, the Zionist American empire, waging a preemptive global war to preserve its dominance. And that's the link between Ukraine and occupied Palestine, and also the increasing tensions in the South China Sea.Professor, the United States has 40% of global military expenditures. Do you think this expenditure is necessary for the national security of America? How can we justify this expenditure by the United States of America?The enormous military expenditure by the United States is largely a kind of subsidy to a corrupt military industrial complex, specifically the shareholders and executives of the corrupt corporations, and the bribed and profiteering generals and military people who are all making money from this.The United States is not able to buy a mean, lean military force. On the contrary, its military is grossly inflated in its budgets and grossly deflated in its capabilities. That's why Russia is defeating the United States in Ukraine, and that's why the Palestinian resistance and indeed the regional resistance is defeating the United States in West Asia. Again, the United States empire is decadent and collapsing. And its weakness is visible in this hemorrhaging of its financial power to prop up corrupt corporations and bureaucracies—while with a fraction of the US military budget, Iran is able to create a deterrent through its ballistic missile program that can checkmate the Americans in the region, as Scott Ritter recently wrote.President Biden is hoping to win re-election and to continue to expand arms expenditures and supplying the Israeli entity. Do you think the American people will agree for that policy in the future?The American people are beginning to rebel against their enslavement and occupation by the Zionist entity. We're seeing a huge anti-Zionist, anti-war movement on college campuses. Columbia University in New York City is now occupied by its students,and similar protests are happening elsewhere. The American people are turning against the Zionist genocide of Gaza. And the polls show that as time goes on, Americans are waking up to the reality of the fact that the Zionist entity is inherently

Ahnaf Ibn Qais discusses today’s article “The End of ‘Israel’ & The Death of Zionism: Why Time has run out for the Neo-Crusader European Settler Colony in West Asia.” Excerpt from the article:Contrary to ‘Israeli’ Hasbara, the Zionists are not a people who ‘made the desert bloom’ courtesy of their own autarkic, innovative nature. Instead, the vast majority of ‘Israeli’ economic activity is heavily subsidized by their American poodles:US subsidies for the ‘Israelis,’ when inflation is factored in, amount to some 300 billion USD or so, spanning 1946-2022. This averages to around ~4 billion USD per annum, which for a 600 billion USD economy is a significant amount in its budget sheet.‘Israeli’ society thus runs like a Neo-Crusader military garrison with the organs of a state apparatus. The American poodles fork over substantial funds to subsidize healthcare, services, munitions, etc., while the Apartheid regime spends on the military:This has meant an extraordinarily fragile & plump system that no longer can fight a peer-to-peer conflict, opting instead for heavy-handed military policing operations against a primarily defenceless civilian population residing in Gazah & the West Bank.Excerpt from the interview:Ahnaf Ibn Qais: A case can be made that we're now getting to the point where all the signs of collapse are basically in front of us. And we simply have to take the extra step and simply acknowledge that, OK, this is precisely what it is we're seeing. Right. And there is no ironclad rule which says that, OK, a country X or country Y has to exist forever. Right. There's no such rule for that, especially for like a stolen land such as Palestine, which the Israelis have occupied for so long. With regard to what those signs are, I think I outlined them, but basically there's five.And Ilan Pape, the historian—once upon a time he called himself an Israeli, but now he's too ashamed to do so because of all the crimes and genocide and ethnic cleansing taking place. But it was his idea that actually we're seeing these five things play out right now. And the first one really is the fact that even prior to Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, which the Palestinian Joint Operations Room conducted, Israeli society was teetering، because the ultra right wing fascists in government, Ben Gavir and his cronies, were running around like mobbing people, engaging in pogroms and all the other stuff, right? And so they were already diplomatically isolated, right?In addition to that, the resistance axes in the region, the Islamic resistance axes and their Christian allies, were already fighting back tooth and nail and making significant headway. And this is before October 7th, right? So when they did the Huara pogrom on February, they met with a lot of resistance even back then. And they expected a full-scale massacre, a one-sided massacre, but they were super surprised when the savages and the brown and black untermenschen fought back, right?So that was quite surprising for them. They got a bloody nose from that. And, you know, post-October 7th, you've seen global solidarity for the Palestinian cause flower. You've seen really a situation where…I think George Galloway said it best. He said that once upon a time, if I look for the pro-Palestinian crowd in London, I could probably snugly fit them in Wembley Stadium. But now there's like millions and millions of decent, fair-minded people of faith, no faith, Jew, non-Jew, Muslim, non-Muslim, who have taken the view that, this illegal entity can no longer stand. And so we have to be for Team Palestine because being on Team Palestine is being on Team Humanity, right? That's the second reason. The third reason is of course the economic implosion of the Israeli economy, which we're seeing live before our eyes. In the last quarter of 2023 they lost 20 percent of their GDP, so that's like well over 100 billion dollars evaporating. The fourth reason is the so-called most moral army in the world being unable to beat barefooted resistance fighters wearing khakis and adidas flip-flops and tracksuits.And the last reason, which some people actually don't think about, is that Jewish populations all across the world, whether it's in the States or Europe or elsewhere, actually don't like Israel anymore because they are conducting a genocide and ethnic cleansing in their name.And most Jewish people are decent and fair minded and they want no part in this drivel. So that, in a nutshell, is why I personally see the doom coming for this vile settler colony. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkThe U.S. president has signed into law a bill that extends the government's warrantless spying powers for two years. Joe Biden signed Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act after it passed the Senate by 60 against 34 votes.The move was slammed by privacy advocates inside and outside of Congress. They said that it allows intel agencies to spy on the communications of non-U.S. citizens, including communications on such service providers as Google. The activist group Demand Progress said the law is a dangerous tool in the hands of many presidents and a historic mark of shame. The Brennan Center for Justice also said the law is shameful and is a gift to any president who would wish to spy on political enemies, journalists, and ideological opponents.Kevin Barrett is a political commentator who joins us from Saidia in Morocco. Welcome to the program. So when you take a look at why the U.S. is compelled to spy on its citizens and communications, whether it's online or what have you, isn't there a sense of paranoia that's behind it? And how much does that infringe on people's privacy?That's right. The government of the United States today—which is really an illegal and unconstitutional regime that's usurped the American Republic—has every reason to be paranoid. Because they have no legitimacy. And the reason they have no legitimacy is precisely that they have overthrown the United States constitutional republic and replaced it with a kind of imperial, militarized, corporate fascist regime.The United States Constitution very clearly bans “unreasonable searches and seizures.” That's in the Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights. That's always been interpreted as demanding that the authorities get a specific search warrant for any kind of surveillance of anybody in the United States before actually collecting any information. And that search warrant has to be requested from a judge. The judge has to verify the specifics of the individual case before the government is allowed to spy. There has to be probable cause that a crime has been committed. Otherwise, the United States government, if it were a legitimate constitutional government, would not be allowed to spy on anyone without each of those specific warrants. That's the way the law has always been interpreted in the United States until the the republic was overthrown by this criminal cabal that rules today through all sorts of illegal measures, including blackmail of leaders. Jeffrey Epstein, of course, worked for the Israeli Mossad, blackmailing American leaders for this deep state criminal organization that currently rules.So they're paranoid because they know they're illegitimate. And if the people ever wake up and notice that they're being ruled by a gang of ruthless, psychopathic criminals, that will be the end. All these people will be hanged or guillotined. The French Revolution will look like a tea party compared to what will happen when the American people see what's been done to their republic.So that's why these criminals need to spy on everybody. And that's what this law allows them to do without any warrants, without any legal process or due process of law. Under this law, anybody who has equipment that can be used to transmit or store electronic communications must cooperate with the authorities in turning over everything they have.So that means that's the end of the Constitutional Republic. And people like Attorney General Merrick Garland are cheering for this big brother Orwellian measure. He's one of the world's worst criminals. He was in charge of the cover-up of the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. He probably participated in the planning of that bombing itself, murdering hundreds of children in the daycare center in Oklahoma City. He's a child murderer, just like the Zionists and the rest of this criminal cabal of blackmailing pedophiles that own the United States. They’d better be watching everybody, because they are hated so much. They're so illegitimate that they will all be executed the minute that the American people wake up.And if we want to take a look at the different online platforms, whether social media or search engines…everything gets recorded, right? And the social media platforms like Facebook or like Instagram—these are a gift to the CIA, I'm assuming. They are using it to basically find out what each individual is doing. Isn't that correct in terms of them using those platforms also to basically monitor whoever they want?Absolutely. Social media as they exist in the United States are a self surveillance regime that these monstrous criminals have deliberately designed to trick people into giving up their data. And the people who run these so-called social media digital prisons, gulags, are making money by stealing people's data. And they were laughing at the dumb F-words, as Mark Zuckerberg put it, who are stupid enough to use the social media and turn over all their data.So, again, these

Rumble link Bitchute linkThe featured story at this week’s False Flag Weekly News is Scott Ritter’s “Checkmate.” Ritter argues that Iran demonstrated on April 13 that it can penetrate US and Israeli air defenses using swarms of drones paving the way for showers of ballistic missiles. Most are cheap decoys designed to “unlock the door to the Iron Dome” so the real weapons can get through. Iran’s retaliatory strike scored direct missile hits on two heavily-defended Negev bases, using missiles with either very small warheads or no warheads at all. The goal was to deliver not death and destruction, but a message: Iran now has the ability to level Israel and destroy US ships and bases in the region. Henceforth, no further actions like the murderous Israeli attack on the Iranian consulate in Damascus will be tolerated. And by implication, Iran will not permit Israel to complete its genocide of Palestine.The Zionists’ very weak response consisted of sending a couple of cheap drones to the general vicinity of Isfahan where the IRGC easily shot them down. That act of conspicuous non-retaliation was a tacit admission that Israel’s plan to drag the US into all-out war is not ready for prime time.According to Ritter, Iran’s defeat of combined US-Israeli air defenses has global implications. Not only have the enormous and ever-expanding missile arsenals of Iran and Hezbollah checkmated the Zionists’ regional nuclear monopoly, but by implication the at-least-equally-advanced missiles of Russia and China should have no problem defeating US air defenses. The US empire, with its flotilla of sitting ducks and its 800 now-hypervulnerable bases occupying dozens of countries, is about as impregnable as the Maginot Line.The Zionists made an existential mistake last October by gambling that they could complete the genocide of Palestine under US protection. Their time-tested m.o., "seize ever-increasing power over the US and force America to do Israel’s dirty work,” has passed its expiration date, because the US empire is no longer what it once was—in large part due to the damage Israel has inflicted on it.Netanyahu’s minions are currently threatening the Biden regime: “Support our genocide, or else!” In this case, “or else” implies Zionist power to remove team Biden, whether by assassination (a Zionist specialty) or by using financial and media power to throw the election to Trump (or whoever promises to take orders from Tel Aviv). But as April 13 demonstrated, the US no longer has the power to protect Israel, or even its own bases and ships. And Israel has even less power to protect itself. So it doesn’t really matter who’s in the Oval Office. Even less does it matter that the Zionists can force Congress to pass bills against such expressions as “river to the sea.” The Zionist entity, like US global hegemony, is doomed. And though the Entity itself is thrashing out madly and genocidally in its death throes, it remains to be seen whether the managers of the US empire will follow suit and instigate a planetary “nuclear Masada.”Future historians will no doubt express puzzlement about why and how Israel captured then helped destroy the US empire that it was so completely dependent on. Below is an article sketching the broad outlines. -KBElection Interference: The Elephant in the RoomBy Kevin Barrett, for American Free PressThe term election interference entered the American lexicon in late 2016. Following Donald Trump’s surprising victory, allegations that Russia had somehow rigged the contest for Trump were heavily publicized. The so-called Trump-Russia scandal was used to hobble Trump’s presidency, even though the 2019 Mueller Report and subsequent investigations found little support for the allegations.Now Israel, of all countries, is whining about election interference. Israeli officials and their bought-and-paid-for American mouthpieces have charged that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s call for new elections in Israel is—as Zionist flack and death squad organizer Elliot Abrams put it— “unconscionable interference in the internal politics of another democracy.”Do countries interfere in each others’ elections? Of course they do. The US is a repeat offender. But Israel’s interference in American politics dwarfs anything America has ever done.Actually, to say that Israel interferes in US elections is an understatement. Israel practically owns US elections. Former six-term congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D-GA) has revealed that shortly after she arrived in Washington, she was pressured to swear a loyalty oath to Israel. She was told that virtually all congressional representatives take the oath, and that any who resist face formidable obstacles to re-election. (Imagine if the Kremlin were making US officials swear loyalty oaths to Russia!)AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, is by far the most powerful lobby in Washington. Though it pretends to be a domestic group, AIPAC is a front for the Israeli government.

Mees Baaijen introduces his new book The Predators vs. the People: The Big Picture of the 500-Year Secret War Against Humanity. He makes a case that a global mafia or “Glafia” has been riding the power of usury, a.k.a. exponentially-compounding interest, toward complete global domination. For an introduction to his thesis, check out his 2016 article “Who Are the Controllers?”Excerpts from The Predators vs. the People:“In his explosive book Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of 3,000 Years (1986), Jewish scholar and survivor of the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp, Israel Shahak, describes classical Judaism as a totalitarian scheme to benefit a few very wealthy Jews (ifamericansknew.org shahak.html). From the second century until roughly the eighteenth, Jews were under the heel of their rabbis and wealthy leaders.”“Apparently, Glafia wanted to conclude the colonization of Africa and Asia before their grand 20th century Eurasian offensive, because in 1884, a conference was held in Berlin to assign all uncolonized territories of Africa to the European powers. Bismarck led it, and we know that he was a Glafia pawn. By 1914, the ‘Scramble for Africa’ and colonization of the rest of the world’s ‘low hanging fruit’ was completed. By a ‘little coincidence’, in the same year, Glafia’s biggest operation, the subjugation of Eurasia’s 13 empires, the ‘high hanging fruit’, was started by its American-British-Zionist proxies: The Great 20th Century Slaughter of Eurasia. All the above-mentioned efforts of discovery, colonization and wars were crucial in bringing ALL LANDS under control of ‘normalized’ nation-states, a major goal in Glafia’s control project which was recently completed through the War on Terror. From then on, Glafia’s focus has been on ‘normalizing’ ALL PEOPLE, by a surveillance system detecting and deterring dissent, which means the development and implementation of a totalitarian digital control system, for which you and I haven’t been asked permission.”Excerpt from the interview:“My book rests on three pillars of evidence. First, the authors that have been labeled as conspiracy theorists, like Quigley and Sutton and later also McGregor and Preparata. If you go to Wikipedia, you will find the classical labels they put on these people that are anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists and so on.“But I also discovered, and that's a new insight in my book, that there were very esteemed and respected historians saying the same thing, but in different terms. And when you are not aware of this project and you read their books, you don't see it. It's like an exoteric reading. After years of research, when you have become an insider and you read those works again, you see they were talking about the same thing. And I'm referring to several ones, but the most important are Fernand Braudel, who is seen as the most important French historians of the 20th century, and his student, Giovanni Arrighi. And there's also Charles Tilley, who is a historian and a sociologist, who have said the same thing, but in different terms.“And then the third pillar is all the people who over centuries have warned against this group and their plans. I have like almost 200 very impacting quotes of people—ex-presidents, prime ministers, writers, artists, and so on, all saying the same thing: “This is a facade, behind it is a hidden group that wants control of the world.”Meeuwis T. Baaijen (1952) was born and brought up in simple-life rural Holland, where he developed strong ties with nature. As a veterinarian and later also entrepreneur, he worked in 7 countries on 4 continents, which allowed him a direct experience with different cultures, political systems, languages, and above all, people. His international background served him well when he decided to dig deep into global history, to write his first book, The Predators (and its six translations). After 50 years as an atheist, this study convinced him that the Enlightenment was in fact an Endarkenment, to alienate us from Nature and the Universe, from which we derive our power to move mountains. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkThe Intercept reports:THE NEW YORK TIMES instructed journalists covering Israel’s war on the Gaza Strip to restrict the use of the terms “genocide” and “ethnic cleansing” and to “avoid” using the phrase “occupied territory” when describing Palestinian land, according to a copy of an internal memo obtained by The Intercept.The memo also instructs reporters not to use the word Palestine “except in very rare cases” and to steer clear of the term “refugee camps” to describe areas of Gaza historically settled by displaced Palestinians expelled from other parts of Palestine during previous Israeli–Arab wars. The areas are recognized by the United Nations as refugee camps and house hundreds of thousands of registered refugees.The New York Times’ management encouraged its staff to use the word “terrorists” (as opposed to “fighters” or “militants”) when referring to Palestinian military actions such as the October 7 al-Aqsa Storm raid, but never in reference to Israeli massacres of civilians. Like all other US mainstream outlets, the Times has “reserved terms like ‘slaughter,’ ‘massacre,’ and ‘horrific’ almost exclusively for (the handful of) Israeli civilians killed by Palestinians, rather than for (the vastly larger number of) Palestinian civilians killed in Israeli attacks.” This kind of bias has been reported for many years by IfAmericansKnew.org, which has cited studies showing that each Israeli death gets dozens or hundreds of times as much NYT coverage as each Palestinian death. In today’s woke environment, it’s socially acceptable to blame the Times’ biased coverage on “white racism.” According to the woke interpretation, the Times’ management is made up of whites who order their somewhat darker-skinned staff to side with the white Israeli settlers against the brown-skinned Palestinians. Reports of a rebellion by ethnically-diverse NYT staff against their rabidly pro-Israel white management have been circulating since October 7, and it is widely assumed that whoever has been leaking NYT secrets to The Intercept probably has Global South ancestry and non-lily-white skin. Though it’s OK to blame white racism for biased NYT coverage of Palestine, anybody who blames Jewish racism (i.e. anti-goyism) will quickly be labeled a racist themselves! This despite the fact that everyone knows that The New York Times has been a totally Jewish-controlled operation since its founding, and that its rabid bias in favor of the genocidal Jewish State has gotten more extreme over the years. Anyone who doubts that the Jews who run the NYT and the rest of mainstream media are deliberately skewing their coverage to protect their beloved Jewish State needs to read Jewish ex-NYT-journalist Philip Weiss’s “Do Jews Dominate in American Media? And So What If We Do?”Nobody is allowed to touch this third-rail topic in Western media. But Iranian media is another story. That’s why I try to make a point of mentioning it on Press TV interviews, including last night’s. Below is a rough transcript.Press TV News ReviewJoining us now for the program is Scott Bennett, former U.S.Army Psychological Warfare Officer from San Francisco, California, and Kevin Barrett, editor at Veterans Today joining us out is Sadia Morocco. Gentlemen, I'd like to welcome you both to the program here. Always a pleasure to check in with both of you. I guess I will start with you, Mr. Dr. Barrett there. Dr. Barrett, what are we to deduce when the Israeli regime needs this level of censorship to elicit some sense of legitimacy?Kevin Barrett: Well, they can't allow an honest debate with both sides represented because they immediately lose the debate. And they know this now, and they've always known this. Their domination of American media is the biggest reason why this Zionist entity was created in the first place and has managed to persist all of these years. That's their number one line of defense.The great Jewish-American former New York Times reporter Philip Weiss wrote an article headlined, Do Jews Dominate American Media and So What If We Do?, in which he described his career in mainstream media, including at the New York Times. Weiss pointed out that the majority of his bosses, important co-workers and the owners of the outfits had been Jewish, and asked, why does that matter? Well, the reason it matters is because the vast majority of these people feel that the American media is Israel's last line of defense. And so they are motivated to basically use the American media, which is dominated by this ethnic group with loyalty to a foreign state, as a propaganda apparatus for that foreign state.They've been doing it ever since 1948. And they're getting more and more desperate. But today, because of the woke movement, they have to hire multi-ethnic people. They can't just have nothing but Jews and white people at The New York Times. So they hire a few token Arabs and Muslims who are, of course, appalled at all of this. And they leak stuff to The

RRumble linkJosh Mitteldorf wins my vote as the most interesting science writer out there. (Sometimes way out there…) His work is always sensible, well-informed, well-argued, and uncowed by mainstream dogma.Josh has been writing on the UFO-ET issue and its publicizers Daniel Sheehan and Phil Schneider, as well as science and psi, digital mind-control, the hybrid/reptilian/insectoid Peruvian mummies, and much more.We also discuss and critique the way terms like Jews/Jewish and Zionist(s) are used, keeping in mind the diversity of Jewish agendas, the overrepresentation of Jews among both good guys and bad guys, and the unfortunate fact that collective Jewish tribal power is strongly weighted towards the bad guys.Excerpt: “If I have a religion at all, it's Taoism. And I think we need to get beyond there are good guys and bad guys, and I'm one of the good guys and you're one of the bad guys, so I'm here to smite you, to see good and evil as aspects of the world rather than as something we take sides in. I'm a follower of Charles Eisenstein. He likes to write that there are no good guys. There are no bad guys. We're all in this together. We're blindly hurting ourselves because we hurt one another. And that's really the same thing. I am you. You are me. We're all caught in this illusion of separateness. But in some cosmic sense, we're joined at the hip. And there's no such thing as selfishness. It just doesn't work. And what we call evil is really selfishness. “So I'm caricaturing Eisenstein. But I really like him a lot. I think it's a human message. I think it's an antidote to…there's much too much of this us and them going on in the world and we're going to have to get over that. But i]I also think that there's a perspective beyond that and there are stories that just don't make sense in either the good versus evil world or in Eisenstein's world.“And that's really what I hope to talk to you about today. Just what's going on in the world and what's behind it.” This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkIt’s 10 pm in Morocco, 6 pm in Washington DC, and Iran has launched rockets and drones at Iranian military targets in retaliation for Israel’s bombing the Iranian consulate in Damascus and killing seven people, including high-level military officers. Earlier today, J. Michael Springmann and I discussed how the Iranian response, which we knew was coming, would play out. Springmann’s article HOW WILL IRAN RESPOND TO DAMASCUS EMBASSY ATTACK? was the basis for our discussion. Below is an excerpt. -KBLet’s move on to the big news for today, which is in the Iran versus Israel category. The breaking news today, I don't know if you saw this, Mike, was that Iran's IRGC just seized that Israeli-linked ship near the Straits of Hormuz. It's owned by that Israeli billionaire who keeps getting ships seized. So go Iran! Keep seizing more ships. And if anybody messes with you any further, shut down the Straits of Hormuz.Exactly. That's the ultimate. The Washington Post and the news media here in the States and online keep going on about how the Israelis are terrified they're going to have a strike tomorrow morning at nine o'clock, and Genocide Joe Biden is behind this. He's moving forces into the region, but nobody specifies what kind of forces and what kind of equipment. And he's ready to attack Iran on a moment's notice when the Israelis give him the word.Yeah, well, I hope it's not that simple. I had Gordon Duff on the show last night talking about how Obama had pointedly removed the American component of Israel's Iron Dome as a sign of displeasure with Netanyahu at a certain point in the festivities with Lebanon. So whether the Biden administration really wants a bigger war, which will badly mess with his reelection, I don't know. It's hard to believe that he's that stupid. But I think the US is kind of self-destructing, so we can expect almost anything from them. But as Gordon said, if the Americans get involved in any way…when, not if, but when Iran retaliates, that means very likely some combination of hitting American military bases, as happened after the murder of General Soleimani, and ultimately shutting the Straits of Hormuz, which will utterly destroy the United States economy. And probably that would be the event that would be seen after that as the end of the American empire, because a kind of general war would break out and China would emerge on top after that. So anyway, we'll see if all that happens in the next 24 hours.I would like to think the Americans would be smart enough to arrange it with Iran. Iran basically is going to say, OK, this is the level we're going to do. You guys (Americans) stay away. And if you're going to get involved, it's going to be much worse. And the Americans will say, OK, all you're going to do is blow up one Israeli building. Yeah, OK, we can live with that. We'll yell and scream about it, but we won't get involved. Anyway, I think that's actually more likely, Mike. But you're betting that if an Iranian rocket blows up an Israeli building, that the Americans will attack Iran?From the way Genocide Joe has been raving and all the quotes coming from the general staff, they're itching for an excuse to strike at Iran. So they'll take anything as an excuse to lash out at them in hopes of destroying the country, which I think is an impossibility. And as I wrote in my Substack article, which I guess is the next thing up.Yeah, that's the next slide.Yeah. That it's going to be essentially a tit for tat, a measure of response in semblance of the measure of attack on Iran's interests or property. And they will simply escalate it. You raise the stakes, we'll raise the stakes. And as I was told by this well-informed and well-connected attorney in Iran back in 2018, that we had the key to the Iron Dome and a lot of American hostages. And he mentioned the 10,000 servicemen at Al Udeid Air Base, the 20,000 sailors and Marines and civilian personnel in Manama, Bahrain and the Fifth Fleet sailing up and down the Persian, not the American, Gulf.So the Iranians have a wide range of hitting back. They're big on asymmetric warfare, which I think translates as hit them where they ain't in baseball. So they can do things like smash one of the oil drilling platforms that are sealing Lebanese and Palestinian oil and gas out of the Eastern Mediterranean.I don't think they can reach the U.S. base at Diego Garcia with the rockets that they've got, but they can certainly make life difficult for the Israelis and the Americans because they're so invested in the area and they have so many bases and so many structures that are very vulnerable. Or they could do something in Latin America or Africa. Who knows? The Iranians are not stupid.Yeah. I would like to think that the Americans are not really itching for war with Iran. I mean, they say they're not. But then, like you said, there are also these bellicose statements as well. But that's obviously Bibi Netanyahu's plan. Netanyahu's onl

Rumble linkEx-VT editor Gordon Duff, now at TheIntelDrop.com, writes strikingly non-mainstream headlines:*Biden concedes Netanyahu a ‘lunatic mass murderer’ making continued US support of endless War Crimes ‘hard work’;*126 New Jewish Recruits refuse after thousands of Jewish war criminals killed by Freedom Fighters;*Gaza death toll exceeds 33,500 as the newest US backed Jewish Genocide continues;*Zionist regime will drown in blood of Haniyeh’s children and other Palestinians;*Thousands of ‘Half Caste/Untouchable’ Indian Slave Laborers sent to Jewish Occupied Palestine to Act as Human Shields in Iranian Retaliation;*Jews Abduct Over 8,000 West Bank Palestinians as Gaza Hostages;*US, German backed Jewish Terrorists kill more than 120 innocent civilians in a single day: Health Ministry;*Refuting Jurists, Lloyd Austin, with No evidence supporting him, says Jewish Terrorists fully comply with law when murdering, raping kids, looting…Excerpts:I worked in intelligence a long time, and I'm probably doing more real work than I've ever done before. I don't know where to start with some of this. The big project we've been working on collectively, and the we is probably my friends. Carol and I have started hanging out in Iceland, and I've met a lot of people there. There are a lot of young activists there. Most of them are either high or drunk most of the time, which makes working with them a little hard. But good-hearted people backed by a government that won't allow our servers to be shut down simply because we tell the truth.So this is where we've opened the Intel Drop. That's T-H-E, Intel Drop, which does 80 stories a day on a newsletter of censored news, which we don't totally stand behind. We truth bomb the stories. You rewrite the headlines.Yeah. They don't have the guts to actually say what it's about. So listing ISIS is anything other than a CIA proxy, or the truth about the chemical bombings in Syria that were done by the white helmets, a sub organization of MI6, along with the Israelis, but also in combination with the Reuters News Agency and Turkish intelligence. They received their chemical weapons and biological weapons from a USAID-funded facility in Tbilisi, Georgia, called the National Reference Lab, or commonly the Lugar Lab, after US Senator Lugar, who started the funding.What we did is we closed down our germ warfare and our biological warfare facilities in Fort Detrick, offloaded the hundreds of academics into universities, offloaded the illegal research developing new strains of avian flu, swine flu, releasing them and testing them on human beings with some regularity across the Middle East, India, spent attacks more than a few times, Pakistan, Russia, China, biological attacks. We do this on a regular basis.And COVID had something to do with that.COVID-19 was absolutely, no one doubts it.Russia is about 25 years ahead of us technologically. They graduate three times the number of engineers the United States does. Their military-industrial complex is huge and extremely efficient. It runs financially on about 3% of the money ours does. Now they just sent up a rocket we're making fun of, a space rocket, a while ago. What we aren't saying about that rocket, the Agora, that just went up yesterday, is it has a plasma engine. What this allows that rocket to do is its second stage. Once it's out of the atmosphere, the engine in that second stage can run forever. It doesn't do a burn and head off toward the moon at 25,000 miles an hour. It can head toward the moon at 200,000 miles an hour if there was time to accelerate that much. And it can reach those speeds going to Mars.What kind of fuel is it using?It's not using fuel. It's powered by fusion. There's a magnetic coil on the engine that creates a plasma donut, which operates a little like the warp engine on the Enterprise. But it's, yeah, it's a rocket engine with a magnetic coil. And it creates a plasma ring that sits under and that continues to expel neutrons and propel the spaceship with constant acceleration. You can almost use that for interstellar travel.It's making interplanetary travel a reality, but it's also going to make it possible for Russia and China to build a base on the moon, which they've already planned, with a large nuclear reactor. And they will be settling up there, and especially since they can do the trip in a few hours, where it takes days for us, if we could get up there at all. Last time we went up, we went up a few weeks ago, put a lander up there, and it fell down. It fell over on its side.But let's get back to the Jewish settlers in occupied Palestine.The important part of this is that, first of all, using the term Israel, there's no such place. There are no Israeli people. It's not a country. It's occupied Palestine, and it's land that was stolen. And then... This continual blackmail, they get one or the other weak public…And everyone who goes into government, this is the disappointment for so many of us, people who go i

Rumble linkEid mubarak! Just thought I’d let you know that after I took down the paywall at the end of January, at the behest of my subscribers, paid subscriptions initially went up—but then started slowly creeping back down. Now my revenue is lower than it was before I took down the paywall. So please, if you like the no-paywall bigger-audience approach, consider supporting it by getting a paid subscription.Press TV interviews Kevin Barrett and Tim Anderson, April 10 2024Joining us on this edition of the News Review, we have political analyst Kevin Barrett joining us from Saidia. And Director of Center for Counterhegemonic Studies, Mr. Tim Anderson, is joining us from Sydney. Gentlemen, welcome to the program. Let's start off with Mr. Barrett. Sir, I want to get your overall perspective about how this continued genocide is ongoing, unabated. How frustrating is it to see so many innocent women and children and elderly being killed as the international community sits idly by.Kevin Barrett: Yes, it's not just frustrating, but it's it's maddening. And the the world's understated response to this, even among people who are saying something, is part of the outrage. This should be a situation where the whole world agrees that something absolutely has to be done and that all actions aimed at stopping this genocide are appropriate up to and including the very strongest forms of military action against the genocidal Zionist entity. Instead, most of the world leaders just making noises with very ineffectual sounds and cluckings of the tongue. And then we have the one country that could stop this overnight, the United States of America, led by an administration that's completely complicit in the genocide, and that for political reasons has been hypocritically wailing and gnashing their teeth without actually doing anything to stop the genocide. All it would take would would be one phone call: “Stop now or the U.S. will do a U-turn. We will support Palestine rather than Israel tomorrow morning if you don't stop this genocide.” That's all it would take.And what's even more outrageous is that the Zionist domination of Western media has been contributing to the situation in which the genocide could continue. All of the owners and major operators of the entire western mainstream media ought to be tried for war crimes and if convicted, executed. Their coverage has created this genocide, and they are censoring alternative voices who are actually talking about this and telling the truth. I just had my Youtube channel taken down. They called it hate speech. Well, I hate genocide, and I'm not afraid to say it. But you're not allowed to say that on YouTube anymore. You have to be pro-genocide, or you're not allowed to be on YouTube.The Google company that owns YouTube, which they used to have a slogan, Don't Be Evil, is now evil. They're on the side of the genocide. They're tweaking their algorithms to try to coerce public opinion to be pro-genocide. All of these people need to be tried, convicted, and executed.Tim Anderson, the United Nations Deputy Secretary General, in addition to expressing deep concern over the humanitarian situation in Gaza, has made some comments with regards to the situation there in a U.N. press conference. Amina Mohammed said that the international community has lost its, quote, moral compass on the issue of Gaza. Do you see it in that light as well?Tim Anderson: On the other hand, the only people effectively fighting this genocide, trying to prevent this genocide, are the resistance in Palestine, the resistance in Lebanon, in Iraq, in Yemen. And I think a lot of hopes are still placed on and waiting to see what sort of punishment that Iran will do for the crime committed against its own people, its own embassy in Damascus, and hoping that that may in some way cripple the capacity of this genocidal regime.Let's remember when the false accusations were being made against the Libyan leader, Mahmoud Gaddafi, there was talk of a no-fly zone to try and protect civilians. Of course, that was all a pretext. We know that that was a terrible lies that were made to destroy the little nation of Libya. But where are the calls for a no-fly zone now? What about the Israeli Air Force at the Israeli airports? I believe the Iraqi resistance and the Yemenis are the only ones that have been seriously carrying out some strikes against this capacity of the genocidal regime.Kevin Barrett, let's talk a little bit about the issue of the aid trucks that are being blocked by the Israeli regime. Under what pretext, what logic, is there to justify that combating, in the Israelis' own version of the situation there, combating Hamas justifies whether a three-year-old in Gaza can eat or not?Kevin Barrett: Yes, well, of course, they're not only blocking the aid trucks, but they're sometimes actually murdering the aid workers and blowing up the aid trucks, as they did recently. Their excuse, what we hear from Netanyahu, is he says tha

Chicago-based journalist AJ Smuskiewicz recently doubled down on his May 2023 article “Why I’m for Kennedy” with the new “Why I’m Still for Kennedy.” While admitting Kennedy is “wrong on Gaza” (understatement of the century) AJ says RFK Jr. is articulate and intelligent, right about a lot of things, and not as long of a long shot as the media would like you to believe.I see AJ’s point. Compared to the likes of Biden and Trump, RFK Jr. looks pretty good. AJ says “I’m not going to reject a candidate because I disagree—even strongly disagree—with him on one issue (Gaza).” But is Gaza just “one issue” among many? Or is the most transparent genocide in history a whole lot more than that? Isn’t the real issue, for Americans, America’s complicity in that genocide? And isn’t that complicity the outcome of neocon (Jewish-Zionist) occupation of the USA? And isn’t that occupation, which began with Israel’s murder of JFK and RFK and reached fruition with the Jewish State’s demolition of the World Trade Center on 9/11, by far the most important issue of our time?Extract from the interview: AJ Smuskiewicz: I probably would not disagree too much with your previous guest (Alan Sabrosky) in the sense that I am quite a pessimist regarding America's future, especially all the nonsense that we've experienced with the past few years with the COVID lockdowns and the censorship and the rigging of the election. I am quite a pessimist actually.I was a big supporter of Trump and I still like Trump in a lot of ways, but I was disappointed in him in many other ways, mainly because of the idiots that he surrounds himself with, like his son-in-law and Bolton and Pompeo.And the Democrats are just become totally hopeless. They used to be the party of the working class and the party of peace back in the seventies. And I was a kid and now they've become just as big war mongers, if not worse than the Republicans. And they're the party of the Hollywood and Wall Street elites.So when I, when I saw Kennedy come around last year, he initially said a lot of things that I found very refreshing. I never heard anyone articulate so clearly and intelligently what I consider the core problem of this country right now: This corrupt merger of state and corporate power, which Mussolini defined as fascism.And the other thing that he articulated very clearly and intelligently was the problem of the military industrial complex and the war machine, which is causing all of these endless wars all over the world. It’s the last gasp of the dying empire is how I look at it.I consider those key issues, as well as many other things he's talked about that I guess we could get into. I know he probably most likely has no chance of winning. But the most useful purpose of a third party or an independent run for any offices to raise awareness of issues even if he does not win. Just like Cornell West, he is raising important issues.And I support, really, any third party or independent candidate for any office. I don't think people should ever vote for Republicans or Democrats. Again, they're the same thing. At least if you show support for an independent candidate, whether it's a West or Kennedy or Jill Stein or whoever else might be running, you're rejecting the system and you're trying to draw public attention to these issues. And that in itself, I think is a useful endeavor. This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

I just Googled “Quds Day,” which was yesterday. Though millions of people in dozens of countries rallied for Palestine and against Zionism, I couldn’t find any Western mainstream media stories. Instead, I got a long list of non-Western outlets: Al-Jazeera, CGTN, Xinhua, Al-Mayadin, Press TV…And speaking of Press TV, here is a rough transcript my interview, alongside Shabbir Rizvi, during rolling coverage of Quds Day protests. -KBWelcome to another edition of the News Review. In this edition, people across the world have taken part in the international Quds Day rallies taking to the streets as Israel continues its genocidal war in the Gaza Strip. Protesters across Iran waved Palestinian flags and condemned the Israeli regime for its crimes in the besieged territory. The participants also slammed the U.S. over its support for Tel Aviv. Iranians called on the international community to take action and stop the onslaught in Gaza. Protesters also demanded an end to Israel's decades-long occupation of Palestine.International Quds Day was also observed in the Syrian capital, Damascus, where hundreds of Palestinian refugees attended the ceremony. The attendees also saluted the parading resistance fighters elsewhere in Yemen and Sana'a. They reaffirmed their unwavering support for Palestine in another Million Man March. Pakistan and Bahrain were also among those West Asian countries that held nationwide rallies. Jordanians also staged a massive protest in the city of Erbid, which they called Friday of Anger. They fully rejected the Arab country's normalization agreements with Israel.Rallies have also been held in several other countries across the world, including in London, Tanzania, India, Malaysia and Nigeria.International Quds Day was established by the late founder of Iran's Islamic Republic, Imam Khomeini, in 1979. It aims to maintain and raise awareness about the plight of the Palestinian people and their struggle. It is held on the last Friday of the holy month of Ramadan in most countries and on the last Sunday of the month in some others.To discuss the significance of International Quds Day, we have with us Shabir Rizvi, political commentator, who's joining us live from Chicago. We are also joined by Kevin Barrett, political commentator, who is joining us live from Morocco. Thank you very much to both of you gentlemen. Let's begin with Mr. Shabir Rizvi. Tell us about the international Quds Day rallies. When are they going to be held in the U.S.? Is it going to be on Sunday or was it today? And what is the significance of these rallies, particularly at this point in time?Shabbir Rizvi: That's a great question. The rallies are starting now. As you can see behind me, I am in Chicago. This rally is just getting started. We are actually in front of the Zionist consulate here, which gives us a good opportunity to make our voices heard, to make our discourse heard. Chicago has a large Palestinian community, one of the largest Palestinian communities in the United States. So we will have this demonstration today. Then we have it tomorrow. And then Joe Biden is actually coming here Monday. And so we plan to demonstrate then.I would say something that's very different about the United States as opposed to more other countries is that there's a heavy police presence here. You can't see it in my camera, but on the other side, there are a lot of cops. To the opposite of me, there are a lot of cops, and there's a line of cops protecting the Zionist consulate, which is over there. And it just really goes to show you how many people are pouring into the streets of the fruits of the Islamic revolution that was started by Imam Khomeini and the cause of Quds Day and how it's become international to the point of even being on American soil attended by thousands of people in the very heart of America, in the very Midwest. It just goes to show how popular the Palestinian cause is.Thank you very much, Mr. Rizvi. Let's bring in Mr. Kevin Barrett. So in your opinion, considering the Israeli atrocities, the nonstop bombardment despite UN resolutions, several UN resolutions demanding a ceasefire, why the Israeli regime continues these atrocities, and how significant is international Quds State under these circumstances?Kevin Barrett: It was founded many, many decades ago because the Zionist entity is now in a death spiral. They are unable to accomplish any of their military goals. All they are able to do is mass murder civilians, women, children, and then the aid workers who are trying to feed them. All they can do is try to exterminate a civilian population in the most transparent act of genocide in all of human history. And this is utterly demolishing any legitimacy that they may have enjoyed in the eyes of any substantial portion of the world's population.So this year, Quds Day is happening under the shadow of this transparent genocide that is taking Israel down. And it's really a testament to the faith of the Palestinians and th

Alan Sabrosky returns to his “first Friday of the month” slot to discuss the collapse of the Francis Scott Key bridge as a metaphor for the collapse of America; will the Zionists start World War 3, and/or finish the genocide of Gaza, with no interference from the US; where did these crazy Zionists come from originally; is the two-party system just a “faction fight” with the Jewish-dominated uniparty; and “what do we do when we realize the Left has won?”Dr. Alan Sabrosky is the former Head of Strategic Studies at the US Army War College. He expresses his Jewish heritage via cuisine, not foreign policy.Extract from the interview:Could the Baltimore bridge disaster have been caused by a cyber-attack?That's entirely possible. But if I were going to do something, I would probably do it to something other than the Francis Scott Key Bridge. I was talking to Paul Adams yesterday. He said, well, what would be an equivalent false flag to what happened in 2001? I said, well...It'll be kind of hard to top the Twin Towers. Maybe Capitol Hill and the State of the Union Address.All a bridge does is take down some infrastructure, have other bridges used, have roads used. This will be an expensive inconvenience and probably a way to funnel a lot of money to Baltimore, most of which will be stolen by public officials.How are they going to do a 9-11 on the State of the Union address?I was joking. I don't think they would bother at this point. They have it too much in their control. They would take out something inanimate that wouldn't bother them. Now the 14th Street Bridge, that would be something.Well, there were rumors that on 9-11 there were Israelis ready to blow up bridges and tunnels. You may recall that Veterans Today ran some investigations.Yeah, I think it was, I'm trying to think which one it was… The George Washington Bridge.Dan Rather actually had a show on that, or rather had a news clip on it, that the police had captured two individuals in a van filled with explosives heading toward the GW, and they, you know…They caught them. They averted the problem. They turned these people over to the FBI. And like all of the rest of the Israelis who were turned over to the FBI or Homeland Security, they somehow managed to find their way back to Israel.Right. That's the story I've heard as well. With the added detail that painted on the side of the truck full of explosives was a mural of a plane diving into the World Trade Center.That I didn't hear. I knew that they were supposedly from Urban Moving Systems, which is a New Jersey-based Mossad front, as was the van with the five Israelis on it taking camera shots of the Twin Towers. But I hadn't heard about the mural.And according to Gordon Duff, our ex-comrade at Veterans Today, he's now over at the IntelDrop.com website…He claimed that Bernie Kerik, the then New York police commissioner, took charge of the cover-up, and Kerik allegedly has connections to organized crime, which supposedly eliminated some witnesses, including police officers, before sending everybody involved back to Israel. So who knows? Gordon's got a lot of interesting stories.There's also something very interesting, and that was after J6. Four or five police officers, Capitol Hill police officers, supposedly were so traumatized by events there that they committed suicide. I haven't heard of that ever happening anywhere else. I would be far more willing to think that there were some decent police officers who were willing to break ranks and blow the cover story and that they had unfortunate accidents, although I don't think any of them were friends of Hillary Clinton.Yeah, well, that sounds plausible to me, too. I really wondered about that business of the poor police officers were so traumatized they killed themselves after January 6th. That didn't make a whole lot of sense to me.There is a video clip on it. It's not one of those that was released after that brief episode where Tucker Carlson's released some and a few others. But it looked like it was from a cell phone or a tablet camera outside of it. And here's this, I was going to say elderly couple, but I realized they were probably no more than in their 50s and 60s. From my perspective, they're just youthful kids out there playing games. But here's a man and his wife, or his woman anyway, a couple, a heterosexual couple, walking into, holding arms, showed them holding arms and walking up the steps into the Capitol. And I thought, there's your insurrection.So they're still persecuting the evil insurrectionists. And yet here's Trump possibly heading back into the White House. And that leads to the question that you posed when we were talking about what we were going to put on the show or what themes we would cover: Is the two-party system just a faction fight within the Jewish-dominated uniparty? And could RFK Jr. help make it an interesting election?Well, yeah, but Bobby Kennedy doesn't have a chance in terms of electoral votes, regardless of that.

Rumble link Bitchute linkI first seriously read Emerson for an American Renaissance seminar at San Francisco State University in the mid-80s. I was the only student who actually enjoyed the sonorous cadences of the sage of Concord. My classmates thought I was bluffing, or, failing that, perverse. Emerson’s encomiums to authenticity, nature, and the transcendent resonated with me. This was the best of the American spiritual inheritance, of what Harold Bloom called the American religion. Among all the cults and Bible-thumpers and maladapted European sects, Emerson’s Unitarianism was uniquely nourishing, and uniquely “American in a good sense.” It had inspired Thoreau, a hero of my days in the high school library. I recognized belatedly that this was the religion I had inherited, to the extent I had inherited any, from my grandmother, a member of the congregation at the famous Frank Lloyd Wright church in Madison, WI.Unfortunately, by the late 20th century, Unitarianism had abandoned its Enlightenment roots and become a religion of “anything goes.” As long as you can sing Kumbaya off-key, you’re in. Today we have Unitarian ministers who don’t believe in God. No doubt there will be Satanist Unitarian ministers in the not-too-distant future. (Will they perform human sacrifices during Kumbaya sing-alongs?)Unitarianism and America have gone crazy. That is one reason I accepted Islam (“Unitarianism with camels”) and eventually found my way to Morocco. I now find myself agreeing with E. Michael Jones and the Ayatollah Khomeini that America is “the Great Satan.”But is that Emerson’s fault? Dr. Jones thinks the sage of Concord was some kind of proto-satanist who bears responsibility for all that followed. That may not be as unfair as blaming Jesus for the Crusades and Inquisition, but still.Below is my recent debate with E. Michael Jones on the question, “Was Emerson a satanist?” Note that Emersonian Unitarianism, like Islam, rejects the Trinity in favor of Divine Unity, focuses on Jesus’s message rather than his mode of death, and does not accept the doctrine of Original Sin.Was Emerson a Satanist? Kevin Barrett Debates E. Michael JonesKB: Well, we'll talk about that more, but here's another interesting long story on the demographic revolution. Everybody who is susceptible to the propaganda from the modern secular world pushing us towards hedonism, individualism, and anomie will not have children, or very few, whereas the minority of people who are immune to that propaganda and continue to have large families will leave all of humanity as their descendants. And those people are, by and large, religious.So demographers are noticing that the future is likely to be more religious than the present, because that minority of people who are still having large families is disproportionately religious. And that's going to lead up to our discussion of Emerson and matters of religion, because religion is going to matter in a world that goes back to religion.EMJ: Yeah, well, the meek will inherit the earth.Was it Emerson who that said that?No. Quite the opposite.And that leads us to “Cherchez le Juif,” which is the article that set off the Emerson debate. That was your latest article in the form of a book review of La Défaite de l'Occident by Immanuel Todd. It’s an excellent review. I agreed with just about everything. Let’s talk about the rest of the article and then the part about Emerson.Yeah, so I'm saying America's the great Satan. How can you disagree with me?I don't. I think you got that part right.Well, then let's get into the woods. Let's get into the weeds here of how it became the great Satan, which is basically my new project. I'm working on a book about American identity. And that's what Todd is talking about. He said basically that the American empire is failing because the hidden grammar of the American empire is Protestantism and Protestantism has evaporated. That's, I think, a sound thesis. I think that's exactly what's going on.But then we have to get into the weeds here. Well, what do you mean by Protestantism? What is it? He goes to the Max Weber thesis, which is a total cliché that distracts everyone from the real story, which is that Max Weber's Spirit of Capitalism was written in reaction to Sombart's book, which says basically the Puritans were Jews.That's a key issue. He doesn't understand what Protestantism is. He just has this cliché.What is the essence of Protestantism? Especially Puritan Protestantism? Who wrote the epic, the Protestant epic? It's John Milton, the Puritan, who signed the death warrant of the king and then wrote Paradise Lost.And who's the hero of Paradise Lost? It's the devil. And so Satanism is the essence of Puritanism, which is the essence of Protestantism, which is the essence of America.He also doesn't really give full justice to the fact that the group that dethroned the Protestants is, of course, the Jews.Because he's a Jew. And if you're a Jew, “Jew” is not a category. It's l

Historian Laurent Guyénot discusses his new article “Fear of the Jews and the Jewish God of Terror.” It begins: ““It’s time for Jews to be feared!” declared Rabbi Shmuley recently. Jews having failed to overcome anti-Semitism by trying to be loved, respected or admired, must now make themselves feared. This is the new watchword. The problem is, if Jews want to be feared, then they must also accept being hated.”Laurent Guyénot is the author of From Yahweh to Zion and many other books and articles. He is well-known for his revisionist interpretations of the Kennedy assassinations and 9/11.EXCERPT:Schmuley isn't the first person who's made this point that it's better to be feared than loved. Neocon (Michael Ledeen) made a big deal of Jews all being Machiavellians.Yeah, actually Rabbi Shmuley in this small video that he made of himself saying it's time for Jews to be feared, quoted Machiavelli, and he explained Machiavelli said it's good to be loved but it's better to be feared. Machiavelli was talking to the princes, to people who had power. So, you know, if you want to be feared, you better have power. Anyway, you have to have power because otherwise nobody will fear you. So the very fact that he says this means that he considers that his community is now powerful enough to be feared. They did enough trying to be loved. They didn't succeed. They didn't do it very well.Right, but of course when you try to make everyone fear you by mistreating them, you run the risk of angering them, and their anger might outweigh their fear to the point that they might stand up to you, which certainly is what the Palestinians have done.Yeah, actually the paradox is that he says we've tried to overcome anti-Semitism by trying to be loved. So now we're going to try to overcome anti-Semitism by trying to be feared. Good luck with that.How do you do that? you have to think what's going on in his mind. How can he think that he will overcome anti-Semitism by being feared? As I explained in the first paragraph of my article, fear of the Jews translates literally as Judeophobia. Phobos means to fear in Greek. If Jews want to be feared, they will just create more Judeophobia, which is basically what they (wrongly) call anti-Semitism. Shmuley and others who've said this, quoted Machiavelli and so on, they're not really talking about changing anything that much because the hardcore tribalist element of world Jewry has been working overtime to be feared rather than loved for quite some time. Look at the way the ADL terrorizes people who get out of line on online platforms. Anybody who questions the official Jewish version of the Holocaust (TM) is going to be terrorized and they're going to lose their jobs and so on. And then they have the JDL, the Jewish Defense League, to bomb people and kill people…It was Gilad Atzman who said “Jewish power is the power to prevent people from talking about Jewish power.” So that's the power of fear. People are so afraid they will not even say what they are afraid of. It's really getting insane.I would be interested to have your viewpoint about RFK Jr. In my article I end up mentioning that Rabbi Shmuley is an advisor to Robert Kennedy Jr. Some people even thought he would pick him up as the vice president candidate. There is a strange video in which Rabbi Shmuley introduces Robert Kennedy Jr. and talks about his father having been murdered by a Palestinian who hated Israel. And then Robert Kennedy Jr., his son, who has studied the case and knows very well his father was not killed by Sirhan Sirhan—and certainly not because he supported Israel—just sits there and listens. And this creates a very strange feeling, because he's being insulted about the memory of his own father in front of his face and he doesn't say anything. He let Rabbi Shmuley tell this huge lie about his own father. The only conclusion I can come up with is that Robert Kennedy Jr. is afraid of Rabbi Shmuley. There is fear that comes up in this video, I feel. There is no other explanation.You know, as a caricature of a Jew, he is pretty scary because you feel he's really a crazy guy. He's insane. Just listen to him and you get this feeling that he's completely insane. He's possessed by the devil or by Yahweh, I think, you know, which in my mind is basically the same thing.Yeah, he does have a weird vibe. And that brings us to the observation that Ron Unz has made, and I'm sure others probably have too, but Ron's done it in a kind of a memorable way, in saying that the Jewish community has this minority of kamikazes who are willing to go crazy to try to terrorize anybody that is perceived as threatening Jewish power.Yeah, but I have never seen a Jewish extremist going on a suicidal mission, have they? There was Baruch Goldstein, a guy who murdered 29 people in Hebron.That's Ben Gavir's hero. It's interesting that Baruch Goldstein is a hero for the whole Israeli right wing, including Ben-Gvir. They have posters of him on their walls and so

Oliver Boyd-Barrett is one of the few American academic experts courageous enough to challenge US and Zionist war propaganda. His article “Crocus Hall in Context: America is Behind This 100% (Ritter)” raises good questions including: “Did Victoria Nuland have any role in the Crocus Hall acts of terrorism?” His latest article “The Morality and Hypocrisy of Proxy War in a Nuclear Age” opines:In so many different ways, there is a danger of escalation of the conflict to nuclear status. John Mearsheimer, in interview yesterday with Napolitano, seems to think this is only a small risk. But because the danger of nuclear war may only be “small,” its consequences are unimaginably awful, and the “smallness” of risk (and of course there is plenty of scope for disagreement with Mearsheimer’s assessment) is hardly a good reason for engaging in behavior that breathes continuing life into that small risk.Oliver Boyd-Barrett is an emeritus professor of Bowling Green State University, Ohio and of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (California). He continues to teach at the California State University, Camarillo and undertakes occasional lecturing for the Higher School of Economics in Moscow. He co-edited Russiagate Revisited: Aftermath of a Hoax and has authored or edited many other books.Excerpt:I really admire your substack. It's crisp, succinct, very detailed. You are keeping abreast of the best alternative media sources as well as the mainstream sources and coming to very sensible conclusions. I guess my first question is, why aren't there more people doing this? There are a lot of smart people in the academy in the West. And most of them are just going along with the outrageous lies and the completely insane and immoral as well as non-strategic foreign policy that the empire is pursuing. So why are you one of a minority?Well, I think there are two or three different answers to that question, Kevin. First of all, as you can hear, I don't come originally from America. I was born in Ireland. I am an Irish citizen as well as a US citizen. Because of my Irish connections, I am steeped in the history of anti-imperial resistance, in this case the empire being the British Empire. And that's a very useful background for developing a critical consciousness about any form of imperialistic activity. So that's one part of it, at least so far as explaining my own dissidence is concerned.We're probably cousins, Oliver, since my grandfather was an Irish Barrett.Indeed, and thank you for mentioning that. Barrett is a very Irish surname and particularly I believe in County Cork where I still have some relatives.We actually went to County Cork in search of lost relations. Didn't really find any, but maybe I'll go back.They got out while they could before Ireland was taken over by the neoliberal cabal. But I think, going back to your first question, why is it that there is so little dissidence? I think two factors principally come to mind. First off is the absorption of our mainstream media within the power establishment. Mainstream media have nearly always been mere cogs in much larger corporate machines whose wealth puts them at the very heart of US capitalism. And they have very little interest in upsetting the apple cart against their own business interests in order to be able to stay in the business of running mainstream media enterprises today. You have to be at peace with political authority or you cannot survive. This is true of almost any country, by the way. You cannot survive as a mainstream medium today if you have set yourself in hostile relationship to those who have the hands on political and economic power. So that's always been true. I think it works in cycles. I think borrowing from the thinking of Antonio Gramsci, there are periods when there is so much rivalry, there is so much conflict within elites, that a certain space is opened out for critical thought and critical discourse. And there are periods when that space almost disappears and I think we are at such a moment now. And the reason why the space, the window, so to speak, for dissent in the mainstream media is now so narrow is because the Western world is so threatened. It is a long time since the collective West has felt so threatened—in this instance by the emergence of a multipolar world led first and foremost by China.So I think the fact that the mainstream media are now so tight with the other centers of power in our society means that even intelligent people who have never been exposed to media studies or never thought very much about the quality of their information infrastructure, their media infrastructure, they're far, far too accepting of the narratives that are spun day by day by organs such as the New York Times or the Washington Post or the Los Angeles Times or the Times of London or the Guardian. That is truer now than ever before. They (big media) are arms of the state where matters of the existential survival of the collective West

Excerpts:I think there is a new wave of outraged skepticism building now (about MSM coverage of Occupied Palestine) very much like after 9-11 with the 9-11 Truth Movement. And at that time, it was driven by the—at that point—free, uncensored internet. You mentioned social media, but actually social media has made things worse. Prior to the rise of social media the way the internet worked was essentially people linked each other's websites and so it was all a matter of you know finding your way from link to link, website to website, and nobody was filtering it. And also people were emailing each other sources. Then the search engines came along. The search engines would just show you largely what was popular, so whatever people were looking at was what you would get on the search engines.Once the truth movement really started rolling by maybe 2004 or 2005 and especially 2006, whatever you were Googling about 9-11, the first thing you were going to see was pro-9-11 truth material, because that's what people were interested in. And that worried the powers that be.Cass Sunstein, who was essentially the Minister of Information for the Obama administration, wrote an article for the Harvard Law Review in I think 2008. It was published as a book in 2010 called Conspiracy Theories, Causes and Cures. And in that book, Obama's information czar said that conspiracy theories, starting with 9-11 conspiracy theories, are so dangerous that someday it might be necessary to make them illegal. But in the meantime, what the government needed to do to get a handle on them was to perform “cognitive infiltration.”What that really meant, of course, was to infiltrate and to spread nonsense, spread crazy conspiracy theories, make sure that everybody interested in 9-11 truth sees lots of flat earth stuff on their feeds. And that wasn't very easy to do in 2008 or 2010. But as social media took over, and the powers that be got their hands on the levers of the social media feeds… The thing about social media is that on Facebook you're allowing the Zionist Mark Zuckerberg to determine what you see. On Twitter you're allowing Elon Musk to determine what you see. Maybe he has a slightly looser policyAnd in all of these cases you're allowing to some extent the US government to determine what you see. We've seen the the tip of the iceberg with the twitter files and related material. So the rise of social media actually didn't help.Now they make sure that you you'll never find the 9-11 material that used to be so easy to find. I used to be able to just find my own references, stuff I had done, on Google. Now finding myself on Google is very difficult, even though I've got one post with five million views, but I'm totally shadowbanned from Google and from essentially everyplace else. And so are a lot of other people with my kinds of views. The point being that 9-11 truth spread because there was a free internet at that time. Today TikTok is the big driver of the truth about the genocide of Gaza, and that's why the majority of 18 to 24 year old Americans support the Palestinian resistance, which is a shocking amazing and wonderful statistic. And that's being driven primarily by TikTok which does not impose Zionist censorship and shadow banning and algorithm tweaking. All the American sites do. They can't keep a complete lid on truthful information about Gaza but they can spin the whole conversation in such a way that it covers up the the depth of (Zionist) depravity.The hasbara trolls don't rule TikTok and the reason for that is that they're only so prominent on these other platforms because the owners of the platforms make sure that they are. If you have a platform that doesn't give the hasbara trolls special privileges, then they shrink down to the actual percentage of real human beings that support that line, which is very, very small. (When a psychopath goes to court) the non-psychopath that they're up against stays within a reasonable distance of the truth when they testify. So the judge tends to split the difference. The judge doesn't realize that what we have here is a total psychopathic pathological liar versus a (more or less) truth teller, so the judge splits the difference and says: well the psychopath says it says it's 10 billion dollars and the truth teller says it's a hundred dollars, so the reality must be like five billion dollars, so i'm gonna give the psychopath five billion dollars. That's kind of how it works with the Zionists. They have managed to they lie so outrageously that a lot of average Americans hear the Palestinian case which is basically truthful, and they hear the Zionist case, which is an outrageous fantasy of lies, and they think, well the truth must be sort of in between. They must have a lot of right on both sides. They're artists in deflection as well they'll admit nothing they will deny everything and they will deflect constantly like if you have a certain valid criticism valid criticism that can be valid f

Rumble link Bitchute LinkThis week, instead of the regular weekly news roundup, False Flag Weekly News presents a special edition on “The Zio-American Empire vs. China” featuring Cat McGuire questioning bullish-on-China Jeff Brown. Sample:Cat McGuire: We know that the mainstream media gives us completely propagandized versions of everything, but I think that's on steroids with China…I have come to the conclusion that the ultimate clash is going to be with Zog, the Zionist occupied countries, going up against China. What do you think about all of these wars that seem to have so much elite Jewish cabal influence behind them and China being stepped up as probably the next world's (#1) power? Jeff Brown: Thank you. It's a great question. And I don't know if I'm up to the task, but I'll do the best that I can. China, of course, is not Manichean. They do not think in terms of us versus them. They're very holistic. They're very Taoist and Confucius and Buddhist. And they are multipolar, and they're very circular, they're very elliptical in the way that they work with people.So as far as Zionism and Jews, I don't think that even registers with the Chinese. But Western imperialism, global capitalism, is definitely in the minds of the Chinese, and they identify the world's problems through the lens of Western imperialism and global capitalism. Now, how much Western imperialism and global capitalism is affected by ZOG, as you say? I had not heard that before, so thank you for teaching me that. I always say the Anglo-Zionist empire. But how much that group of people is affecting Western policy…I will say that the Chinese are absolutely revolted, I mean absolutely disgusted with what's going on in Palestine and they've tried so hard to do what they can in the UN and going to the Middle East and meeting people and trying to get it to stop. This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rick Sterling discusses his new article “Olympic Doping Case, Global Politics and the Sacrificing of Kamila Valieva: Here is how the West robbed and abused the best figure skater in the world, Kamila Valieva, while provoking the war in Ukraine.” His conclusion: “it is likely that US secret services intentionally created this situation to prevent Russian achievements at the Beijing Olympics and ‘unbalance’ the adversary.” We’ll also discuss his previous article “From Dallas to Gaza: How JFK’s Assassination Was Good for Zionist Israel.“Excerpt from the end of the interview:Of all the people who are masters of really grotesquely mendacious propaganda, the Zionists probably win the prize. And so let's talk about your other article, “From Dallas to Gaza, How JFK's Assassination Was Good for Zionist Israel.”You're not the only person who's been saying things like this. Ray McGovern, for example, just recently in an interview with Judge Napolitano, made a kind of similar, much shorter remark that suggested that he was aware of the case that was first developed by Michael Collins Piper that Israel played the lead role in the Kennedy assassinations.Your article doesn't really get into the pinning of the responsibility of the assassinations. It simply points out who benefits, and that most people—like I was a Kennedy assassination buff from the mid 1970s through the early 1990s, I don't remember anybody noticing that Israel had benefited so greatly from the assassination.Right. It's been extremely well hidden. And I was very surprised myself to discover all these things. And I did it because I helped to organize an event in November of last year which was the 60th anniversary of the JFK assassination.So in the course of, and I've written previous articles about JFK and foreign policy. There's the book, JFK and the Unspeakable, which is very good and which has a lot of information about JFK's moves toward peace and negotiation and compromise with the Soviet Union. He really had a very different notion of foreign policy. The Vietnam War would very likely not have happened if he had continued as president. The assassination or the coup in Indonesia in 1965 would not have happened. In fact, he had accepted an invitation from Sukarno to visit Indonesia. So he was friendly to President Sukarno of Indonesia, who was a leader of the Non-Aligned Movement.So he had a completely different foreign policy, and I was very much aware of that. But as I started looking into it—and I've always been interested and concerned with the situation in Palestine and Israel—I started looking, seeing things that were really interesting, and specific cases (including) the literature that's come out in the last few years about Dimona, the nuclear facility in Israel, and the development of the nuclear bomb at Dimona and the war of words through secret letters between the Israeli Prime Minister Ben Gurion and Kennedy.Some of this documentation has only been released in recent years. And when I looked at the actual letters, it was astounding because in diplomatic language, JFK was laying down the law. He was giving the ultimatum to Ben Gurion that the U.S. needed to inspect this nuclear facility that was under construction at the time.And then I started looking into other elements and I discovered, to my surprise, at that time in 1963, the U.S. was not giving any military aid to Israel. All it gave was food and humanitarian supplies. And the U.S. was supporting the Palestinian right of return, U.N. Resolution 194.And of course, I knew from the past that Kennedy had been very friendly with Gamal Abdel Nasser, the nationalist president of Egypt, and that Kennedy had supported Algerian independence against France.So it became clear that Kennedy really was on a different wavelength and was conducting a very different policy than than not only is it happening now, but happened immediately after his death.Another interesting element is that the parent organization that gave birth to AIPAC was the Zionists of America and the Kennedy administration was adamant that they needed to register under the FARA Act as foreign agents. You can imagine how big a change that would be if AIPAC was not allowed to do all the sorts of things that they're able to do, and be recognized as agents of a foreign country and required to fulfill all the obligations that organizations so designated have to comply with.So I identified the four different areas where Kennedy's policy was really different and how the evolution of Israel could have been really different than it has been. LBJ was completely subservient to Israel and dependent on Israel. Kennedy's death and LBJ's assumption of the presidency really cemented hardcore Zionism and prevented the possibility of a peaceful resolution whereby the Jewish people in Israel and the Palestinian people could find some kind of a workable compromise.And that's what JFK was working towards and that's what ended.It was also news to me and

Retired commercial airline pilot Glen Stanish reflects on the history of the 9/11 truth movement. Was a consensus ever reached about how the illusion of hijacked-then-crashed planes was manufactured? Were the crashed planes ever identified based on their dozens of virtually-indestructible parts with serial numbers and replacement date codes? If not, why not? Whatever happened to Glen’s friend Christopher Bollyn, author of Solving 9/11, which implicates Israel as the author of 9/11? Could the Gaza genocide have been avoided if the truth about Israel’s responsibility for 9/11 had been successfully forced into the mainstream?Glen Stanish is the author of Uncle Sam’s Christian Patriots.Excerpt from the interview:How did you get interested in 9/11? And how did you wake up to the fact that the official story was a bunch of nonsense?Well, back in 2001 I had been subscribing to American Free Press. A few years before that I was flying for TWA and an old TWA captain introduced me to the Spotlight. Anyway, it eventually reemerged as American Free Press. I liked quite a few of their contributors, but especially Christopher Boleyn. I really liked his articles and thought that he was bold and courageous and truthful. I just liked his writing style.But anyway, shortly after the (9/11) event, when some articles first started coming out about alternative theories, I thought, “man, I think you guys are going a little bit too far this time,” and I thought “I'm going to look for whatever other evidence that would maybe disprove some of the theories.And the more I looked, the more I thought, man, oh man, you know, I can't believe it.But anyway, one article in particular that Chris Bollyn wrote about was the crash site at Shanksville, Pennsylvania, and how the mayor and all these witnesses who were there immediately within 15 feet of the smoking crater said that they never found any evidence of a Boeing 757. So I started thinking about how part of our training, as new hires and as recurrent training, there's a course called Crew Resource Management. And it's a study of airline accidents and incidents. And, you know, you always look at the well-documented scenes, and you also look at cockpit voice recordings and air traffic control recordings and flight data recordings and the scenes of the accidents. And I thought, “how can there not be any wreckage?” There are indestructible engine cores and landing gear and tail sections and normally a debris field, even during high speed, high descent rate contacts with terrain.So anyway, I thought I'd give American Free Press a call. I think I spoke with Chris Petherick and he put me in touch with Chris Bollyn and we got to talking about these things and that's what started me on looking into it and definitely suspecting that something else was going on. This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Now that the Evil Empire is about to ban TikTok—or force its sale to Zionists—I guess I should try to post some videos there as an act of solidarity. Unfortunately, the last time I tried to post a video on Tik-Tok, it was quickly taken down by censors. That puzzled me, until I heard Glen Greenwald explain why TikTok also censors his attempts to criticize the American Empire. Greenwald says TikTok outsources censorship to the same CIA (Mossad) cabal that silences and shadowbans us on US-Zionist social media. Why? Because Tik-Tok needs access to the lucrative US market. So the current “ban-TikTok” frenzy is probably a shakedown attempt to gain even more censorship power. Maybe they need it to deal with the surge of pro-Palestine content.So...What can I post on TikTok that won’t get banned? Maybe a cat video? Before I give up and start making cat videos full-time, I think I’ll try resistance-through-hyperconformity and indulge in some brutal self-censorship. Just as an author of a subversive book might publish an empty book cover to avoid offending the censors—just the front cover and back covers without any content—I decided to publish “The Beginning and the End of This Week’s False Flag Weekly News” for the benefit of TikTok and YouTube. That way people who don’t want to know what’s happening in the world can watch the silly beginning and the silly ending, without actually having to encounter any dangerous perspectives on the week’s 30 biggest news stories. And hopefully the censors will appreciate the fact that I’ve deliberately disemboweled my own broadcast in a pathetically obsequious attempt to appease them. (Good thing they’re too dumb to understand irony.)Meanwhile, if you want to watch the full, uncensored False Flag Weekly News, last week’s is here, and next week’s is shaping up like this:FFWN Special! Cat McGuire Asks Jeff Brown about “Zio-American Empire vs. China”Watch Saturday after 1 pm Eastern HEREThis week, instead of the regular weekly news roundup, False Flag Weekly News presents a special edition on “The Zio-American Empire vs. China” featuring China skeptic Cat McGuire questioning bullish-on-China Jeff Brown. I’ve already posted Cat’s questions for Jeff.And finally, don’t miss today’s live radio show:Listen live Fridays noon to 2pm Eastern on Revolution.Radio later archived at KevinBarrett.Substack.comFirst hour: Retired Air Force officer and commercial airline pilot Glen Stanish reflects on the history of the 9/11 truth movement. Was a consensus ever reached about how the illusion of hijacked-then-crashed planes was manufactured? Were the crashed planes ever identified based on their dozens of virtually-indestructible parts with serial numbers and replacement date codes? If not, why not? Whatever happened to Glen’s friend Christopher Bollyn, author of Solving 9/11, which implicates Israel as the author of 9/11? Could the Gaza genocide have been avoided if the truth about Israel’s responsibility for 9/11 had been successfully forced into the mainstream?Second hour: Journalist Rick Sterling discusses his new article “Olympic Doping Case, Global Politics and the Sacrificing of Kamila Valieva: Here is how the West robbed and abused the best figure skater in the world, Kamila Valieva, while provoking the war in Ukraine.” His conclusion: “it is likely that US secret services intentionally created this situation to prevent Russian achievements at the Beijing Olympics and ‘unbalance’ the adversary.” We’ll also discuss his previous article “From Dallas to Gaza: How JFK’s Assassination Was Good for Zionist Israel.“ This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkI recently raised the question: “Do 90% of Israeli Jews support genocide?” I said “yes.” Richie Allen said “no.” The comments section is full of other opinions.Coincidentally, right before last week’s interview with Richie, RT published a piece on Israel’s anti-Zionist Jews: “‘I don’t want to be a pawn in this sick game’: Israel’s anti-Zionist fringe is taking a stand.” I brought it up in this week’s False Flag Weekly News: Yes, there are actually some anti-genocide and even anti-Zionist Jews in occupied Palestine, aka Israel. But there aren't very many. It's less than 2%, probably even less than that, especially the vocal ones. But at least there are some, and RT's correspondent managed to track a couple down.One of them, 25-year-old Tomer Avrahami, is quoted as saying: “Thanks to media research and tours in historic Palestine, I came to the conclusion that I had no willingness to take part in the ongoing Nakba of the Palestinian people,” meaning the Palestinian Holocaust. And they mentioned another one named Tal Mitnick, who keeps getting sentenced to prison because he refuses to serve.The majority of the people who refuse to serve in the armed forces in Israel are doing it for other reasons. But a minority of maybe 10%-ish (of the refuseniks) are doing it because they are against genocide.So there are some, and God bless them.According to the Torah, if there were even ten righteous men in Sodom, the city would be saved. Are there ten righteous Jews in Israel? Very likely. Naturei Karta, the anti-Zionist Orthodox (Haredi) group, is based in Jerusalem. And since RT reports that 30% of Israeli Jewish young people are draft evaders, 10% of whom are anti-Zionist, we may surmise that Tomer Avrahami and Tal Mitnick represent hundreds or even thousands.But the righteous anti-Zionist Jews of Israel are such a small minority, amidst a general population of genocidal lunatics, that God and man both have good reason to be getting fed up with the place. Even America’s pro-Zionist Jews are worried—not only about the future of Israel, but also about its implications for Jews in general. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a hardcore Zionist and the USG’s highest-ranking Jew, sees the writing on the wall and is demanding Netanyahu’s head on a platter. The BBC reported Wednesday that “US Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer has called for Israel to hold elections to replace Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.” Bibi fired back: “We’re not a banana republic.” Actually, Bibi, Israel is even more dependent on the US than your average banana republic. Most banana republics would continue to exist if the US wasn’t propping up their governments, economies, and militaries. Israel wouldn’t. It’s surrounded by over a billion people who don’t want it there. The US cutting off support to Israel would have the same consequences as France cutting off support to French Algeria in 1962. Another well-placed and rabidly Zionist ultra-ethnocentric Jew, Thomas Friedman, says “Netanyahu is making Israel radioactive.” Presumably he means that figuratively. He knows that Israel and world Jewry have benefited for 75 years from the presumption that they are quintessential genocide victims, and that their sudden transformation into universally-reviled genocide perpetrators bodes poorly for their worldly prospects.But Friedman may have chosen the radioactive metaphor because he knows that Bibi is leading Israel down a path that could end in smoking radioactive rubble. It’s quite likely that there has been far more nuclear proliferation than meets the eye, and Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza, with its unlimited potential for regional and global escalation, could easily lead to a tragic, horrendous nuclear solution to the Zionism problem.Even absent the use of nukes, a regional escalation that unleashed the full might of Hezbollah’s arsenal, much less Iran’s, Turkey’s or Russia’s, could largely destroy Israel, according to an Israeli military study. That’s one reason why Netanyahu’s incessant attempts to provoke all-out war with Hezbollah have been shot down by the US as well as elements of the IDF.Schumer and Friedman are trumpeting an Anglo-American consensus that’s engineering a long-overdue Israeli regime change, according to Thierry Meyssan of VoltaireNet:(After repeated provocations by Bibi’s “Jewish fascists”) Washington decided to radically change its policy. Until then, it had considered that it could not afford to let Israel lose. It had therefore supported its crime. Now, it could no longer afford to let the Jewish fascists win. It’s important to understand that Washington didn’t change its mind when it saw the suffering of the Gazans, nor because of a sudden outburst of anti-fascism, but because of the threats of the "revisionist Zionists." Its positions are dictated exclusively by its desire to maintain its domination of the world. It could not contemplate another defeat for its Israeli allies, this time aft

Mahmood OD returns to Truth Jihad Radio to discuss the ongoing genocide of Gaza and how to stop it.Mahmood OD, a native Palestinian born in Haifa, is the author of 2048: A Manifesto for the One State Solution in Israel Palestine. In it, he considers the underlying causes of the violence and instability in the region, and proposes a simple and sensible solution, starting with: “The whole conflict can be solved with one thing: Equality. But to reach the stage of equality, one must establish basic understanding about the other side…” This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Marwan Boustany is the author of Guidance According to the Qur’an. The Qur’an states (an-Nahl 89): “And We have sent down to you the Book as clarification for all things and as guidance and mercy and good tidings for those who self-surrender to God.” People have sought guidance from the Qur’an in many ways. What is the best approach, and why? This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Do more than 90% of Israeli Jews support the genocide of Gaza, i.e. the current “military operation”? Richie Allen doesn’t think so. During my appearance on his show yesterday he challenged me to cite polling data.Unfortunately, no pollster in Israel will ever ask flat-out: “Do you support the genocide of Gaza?” Nor have any asked a more polite version of the same question: “Do you support or oppose Israel’s current military campaign in Gaza?” (I argue that well over 90% would say they support it, while less than 10% would say they oppose it.) So we are going to have to extrapolate. Fortunately (though unfortunately for the Palestinians) this is an easy extrapolation. Time’s “What Do Israelis Think of the War with Hamas?” includes the following paragraph:Poll results were also hawkish when it came to the use of force in Gaza: 57.5% of Israeli Jews said that they believed the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) were using too little firepower in Gaza, 36.6% said the IDF was using an appropriate amount of firepower, while just 1.8% said they believed the IDF was using too much fire power, while 4.2% said they weren’t sureLet me repeat that. Fewer than 2% of Israeli Jews think the IDF is “using too much fire power” in Gaza.Richie Allen might argue that those numbers may have changed since the poll was taken in November. But he would be grasping at straws. There is no evidence whatsoever of any significant change. Essentially nobody, I repeat nobody, in Israel is protesting against the IDF’s wholesale massacre of Palestinians. The “left-wing” Israelis are protesting Netanyahu’s failure to get the Israeli hostages returned. But they are completely indifferent to the genocide of Gazans. In fact, “indifferent” is probably the wrong word. To the extent that any Israeli Jews are saying anything about Palestinian suffering and death, they are wildly celebrating it.This poll wasn’t an outlier. During a previous massacre of thousands of Gazan civilians, 2008’s Operation Cast Lead, “a poll taken the day after the start of the operation showed 81 percent of the Israeli public supporting the operation, with only 12 percent opposed.” Since 20 percent of Israel’s population are non-Jewish Arabs who disproportionately opposed the massacre, that means that virtually the entire Israeli Jewish population supported it. Polls during subsequent “mowing the lawn” operations gave similar results.So if fewer than 2% of Israeli Jews think the IDF is “using too much fire power” in Gaza, does that mean that Israeli Jews, as a group, are raving genocidal lunatics that need to be dealt with in the same way that mad dogs are dealt with?That comparison is unfair—to mad dogs. It is also unfair to some of the 140,000 or fewer Jewish Israelis (out of a total population of around 7 million) who, by way of thinking that Israel is “using too much fire power,” may actually oppose the genocide that is being perpetrated in their name. God bless that minuscule minority of non-genocidal Israelis. As for the other 98%…maybe the Jewish Autonomous Oblast would make a good re-education facility.Extract from my conversation with Richie AllenGoing back to the days I was on radio in Spain, it is morally and it is wrong on every level to take hostages, regardless of who you are. We know what the IDF and the Israeli police have done to the people of Gaza for decades and decades: Reprehensible things, disgusting things, crimes against humanity. But two wrongs don't make a right. And keeping people for months, you know, in terror, because they must be terrified, the hostages. And never knowing when they're going to go home. That's wrong, Kevin. And I can't support that. I support the people of Palestine and their rights to their land, the right of return, all of that, pre-67. I know my history. I know Israel should not exist. Not legally. It has no legal basis, of course. It has no legitimacy in law internationally.But don't keep hostages. Don't do that. It's terribly wrong. I hear what you're saying, you know, that it's leverage, but you're describing human beings with loves, with families, with cares, with ambitions. You're describing them as leverage. They're not. They're human beings, Kevin.Well, yeah, that's a good point, Richie. But remember that Israel is holding 10,000 Palestinians hostages and it systematically practices torture on them and sexual abuse. Before October 7th, Israel was holding, at that point, 6,000 or however many thousands of Palestinian hostages. Now it’s 10,000. So, if the Palestinians try to grab a few hundred hostages in order to get their own 10,000 plus hostages released..It's true that inn war, people have to do terrible things. And so the onus is on whoever starts the war. In this case, it was these genocidal lunatics who crossed the seas because they believe that their god gave them this land thousands of years ago. They have a many-thousand-year-old real estate deed, and it has apparently no statute of limitations on it. So they have