Truth Jihad Radio

Rumble linkPress TV: Nearly a dozen Palestinians are killed in the West Bank as the Israeli regime launches a major military offensive in several cities across the occupied territories.Joining us on this edition of the News Review, we have Palestinian scientist and author Mazin Qumsiyeh joining us from Bethlehem, and also we have Editor of Veterans today, Mr. Kevin Barrett, joining us from Saidiya, Morocco. Gentlemen, welcome to the program. Let's start off with Mr. Qumsiyeh in Bethlehem. Sir, please give us your assessment of this wave of Israeli aggression, provocations, and crimes that we've been seeing increasing over the past days.Mazin Qumsiyeh: But of course, ever since the Gaza genocide started in late October, the aggression in the West Bank is increasing as well. Indeed, what we observe is in the past months or so we had over 653 Palestinians killed in the West Bank, and about 5400 who were injured. This seems to be accelerating, because as you pointed out 11 Palestinians were killed in the West Bank in the past hours including six in Janine and five in the Tubas area. So the israeli military is accelerating its actions, especially in and around refugee camps in the north of the West Bank. And as usual it will expand to other parts of the West Bank, as (when it) started in the north of the West Bank and then it expanded to the south of the West Bank. So my prediction is that more violence will be done towards the Palestinians by both the soldiers and the settlers. Already settlers are killing also Palestinians and attacking them. I even have friends of mine who were attacked by settler gangs basically doing pogroms in places like Jit and other areas. This is all done with the blessings of the Israeli government, of course, and its military, which is part and parcel of this apartheid regime. So in the West Bank, we're catching up with Gaza, in terms of numbers slowly beginning to increase.Mr. Kevin Barrett, many observers believe that the settler violence that is going on parallel to the Israeli occupation forces' violence against Palestinians is part of a greater plan to eliminate the Palestinians, and it has been intensified on purpose. Also, Islamic Jihad believes Israel's large-scale military campaign that we're seeing now is part of the regime's plans to tighten control over-occupied Al-Quds and also the holy Al-Aqsa Mosque. Do you see it in that light as well?Kevin Barrett: Yes, I agree completely. And I also just wanted to mention that it's a great honor to appear in the same show with Dr. Mazin Qumsiyeh He's a hero of mine, and everybody should try to get on his email list, one of the most informative sources for what's really going on in occupied Palestine.So the settler violence is portrayed in the Western media as though it's somehow different from the official Israeli government violence. But even now, the Western media is having to admit that the crazed, fanatical, messianic-millenarian settlers, who make no bones about the fact that what they're trying to do is force their messiah to come by ramping up these abominations in the Holy Land, believing that horrific violence is the way to force their Messiah to come—who they believe will be a world conqueror who will subjugate all of the other nations to the Jews, and every Jew will have a couple of thousand slaves, and this so-called Messiah will rule the world from a “rebuilt” blood-sacrifice temple which will supposedly replace the Al-Aqsa Mosque, the oldest and greatest Islamic architectural monument on earth.So these people are trying to create an apocalyptic war. And their current phase of that war is the genocide of all of the people of Palestine. And the settlers are straightforward about this. What I just described sounds crazy, but if you talk to them, they will basically endorse it and say, “yeah, that's what we're trying to do. We're trying to bring back the Messiah by getting rid of the Palestinians, by killing them and driving the rest out.”The Israeli government can't quite bring itself to admit that, or historically it hasn't, but it's starting to now with people like Ben-Gvir and Smotrich in Netanyahu's cabinet. They're also pretty straightforward about the fact that their project is the extermination of the people of Palestine. That is genocide. They're open about their genocidal intent, which means, of course, that they should be in the Hague, not in occupied Palestine. And even Netanyahu has devoted his whole life to this project, but his father was a Princeton professor who taught him how to be a little bit subtle about it.So Netanyahu doesn't come right out and explain that what he's trying to do is conquer the world, subjugate all non-Jews, and set up a global dictatorship in Jerusalem. But that's the project that he's been groomed for for his entire life by his Princeton professor father.So what we're seeing here is not just some kind of random violence or even normal settler colonialism. What we're seeing is the r

Rumble link Bitchute linkMy escape from America after a three-week visit went swimmingly. (I am now back in Saidia, Morocco, swimming in the Med every day). Unlike Scott Ritter, I wasn’t prevented from boarding an international flight, then sent home to be raided by the FBI. Unlike Richard Medhurst, I wasn’t arrested, dragged out of the airport, and thrown in a jail cell for the crime of practicing alternative journalism. And unlike Pavel Durov, I wasn’t kidnapped by thought police to be tortured until I turned over my passwords.I got out before nuclear World War III breaks out (which could be sooner than most people realize, since in the current situation, Russia expert Gilbert Doctorow tells us, “a preventive Russian attack on NATO, on the continental United States, not to mince words, is entirely conceivable.”) I got out before a monkeypox scamdemic locks down airports. I got out before an actual Trump assassination attempt by his Deep State enemies (as opposed to the July 13 preventive PR op) leads to all hell breaking loose. I got out before another stolen, I mean, disputed election throws the country into chaos.Why I LeftIn 2006, during an interview on Wisconsin Public Radio, the host—I believe it was Joy Cardin—asked me something like: “If you really believe 9/11 was an inside job, why are you still living in America?” My answer was something like “I’ll be damned if I let those neocon b******s run me out of my country.” Since there was still a modicum of free speech, I planned to use it by way of a truth jihad. And it worked…for awhile. Until around 2015 the 9/11 truth movement dominated the internet. The search engines still gave honest results, such that anyone googling anything about 9/11 was led to the most-frequented urls relating to 9/11—the truther sites and videos. The notion that internet platforms could discriminate on the basis of political viewpoint was anathema, as it had been since the internet’s founding. But by the mid-twenty-teens, internet freedom started dying. Neocon think tanks, following Cass Sunstein’s lead, pushed the idea that in an era of dangerous “conspiracy theories,” viewpoint neutrality was no longer viable. Trump’s election was blamed on internet freedom in general and Russia’s misuse of it in particular. Within a year or two, the worldwide web was no longer a free speech zone. I was relentlessly shadowbanned and increasingly deplatformed (first by Facebook and GoFundMe, and then, in the wake of COVID, by Patreon and YouTube).As freedom vanished, popular and elite culture became more vapid and vulgar. The subliminal message that truth is dangerous penetrated the mass mind. But deep, dangerous truth, and the hearty and fearless willingness to embrace it, is what gives both conversation and artistic creativity their zing. Today, most of the people willing to face taboo truths rarely speak them in real life, and feel the need to hide behind masks of internet anonymity when they post them online. Even truthspeaking has become part of a general culture of people constantly staring at their phones and getting emotionally riled up about the taglines and images popping up on their tiny little screens.An unfree America—or, rather, an America whose founding ideology of freedom has degenerated from celebrating thoughtfully subversive expression to repressing it and instead celebrating the “freedom” to flaunt sexual deviance and murder unborn babies—is an America not worth living in. Is Freedom Overrated?Though the USA calls itself “one nation under God,” it’s obvious to all that freedom, not God, is the nation’s unifying transcendent value and de facto religion. The transition from a more balanced regime of “God and freedom” to today’s “freedom from God” has paradoxically resulted in the diminishment of actual freedom. There are reasons for that, too complex to go into here. For details check out Peter Simpson’s critique of political liberalism.Here in Morocco, freedom is definitely not the nation’s unifying transcendent value. God is. Freedom is just a useful heuristic: “Let people do their thing unless there is a good reason not to.”The king of Morocco’s role is not freedom-crushing despotism, but rather to symbolize the religiously-legitimized sovereignty that every man enjoys in his own house. “God, country, king” is the national motto, and though the subtext isn’t exactly the Huey Long version of “every man a king,” it’s on the same wavelength. (Likewise, every woman is the queen of her house in general, and its inner portions and kitchen in particular—but the roles of men and women are still different and still based on complementarity/polarity rather than equality/identity.)The king of Morocco, the national patriarch, slaughters a sheep on Eid every year, as do all Moroccan male heads of households. This ritual of sovereign masculinity symbolizes and reinforces patriarchy. For a good secular-Freudian analysis, see Combs-Schilling’s Sacred Performances.A few days before I l

Bitchute link Rumble link (missing last 20 min.)Anti-aging scientist Josh Mitteldorf has a somewhat different take on libertarianism from my live show’s first hour guest Etienne de la Boetie, as Josh explains in “Science and Politics, Libertarian and Socialist.” While aligned with Libertarians in support of free speech and opposition to war and government surveillance, Josh writes, “I part company when it comes to the libertarian credo of the sanctity of private property…Private property is not a God-given right, and it is certainly not ‘natural law.’ The earth doesn’t belong to me, and the fact that I dig up a diamond doesn’t imply that my ownership is an unalienable right. Not only doesn’t the earth belong to me, it doesn’t belong to Bill Gates or Exxon Mobil or the Bureau of Land Management.”Do you agree with the libertarianism of Etienne, Josh, or neither/nor? Drop a comment when this show is archived at my Substack. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Libertarian author and Substacker Etienne de la Boetie of Art of Liberty makes his Truth Jihad Radio debut to discuss his suspicions about the July 13 alleged Trump shooting. Check out that link and see which of the 23 reasons, if any, you find the most convincing. We may also discuss who JD Vance really is, how bad the COVID jab really is, and what the US government really is, among other topics. And we’ll likely discuss the Democrats’ rebranding themselves as “the Party of Freedom (From).” This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkFormer White House policy analyst Barbara Honegger discusses the Stalinist show trials (complete with rescinded plea deals) for innocent 9/11 scapegoats Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and others falsely accused of Israel’s 9/11/2001 attack on America. That discussion occupies the first ten minutes. Also on the agenda is the July 13 “Trump shooting” in Butler, PA. In the video version linked above, Barbara Honegger presents images supporting her contention that Trump was never shot, though others were, in what amounts to yet another murderous publicity stunt.Barbara Honegger’s pioneering book October Surprise, the first by almost three years and subsequently confirmed by formerly classified documents and deathbed confessions of key conspirators, led to a Congressionally mandated re-investigation of the Iran side of the Iran-Contra scandal funded at the level of the 9/11 Commission.Excerpt from the interview:Obviously, if you or I were the lawyers for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and company, we would mount a 9/11 truth defense. That is, we would bring in the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and ask: How could this guy have had access to the Twin Towers to do the most technologically sophisticated demolition in the history of engineering? That would not only be a slam dunk defense on the facts, but also it would force the government to back off, because they can't allow you to make that defense in public or they're screwed. So basically, if you're the lawyer for these guys, you have to make that defense. It's an absolute winner, both on the facts, and also the government has to fold if you have the guts to make it. So why won't they make that defense?Well, that's a very good question. We'd hopefully have to get Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's main defense attorney on your show. And his name is in the articles that I give the links to in my PowerPoint presentation that will hopefully be on your show page for today's show. The other thing that is really important to know is that based upon what I just told you about what really happened in the lead up to 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the other two in their plea deal, with their attorneys, of course, going along with it and probably writing every word of the plea deal, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the others agreed to pleading guilty to every single one of the individual murders.But they didn't do any of them, not a single one of them. So there's no question in my mind that these defense attorneys are really part of the conspiracy to try to lock down the official story at Guantanamo.That makes a lot of sense. What we really should have done was renditioned or arrested Netanyahu when he came before Congress, and prosecuted him for each one of those murders.Yeah. What did they call the waterboarding? They had a euphemism for it.Enhanced interrogation.Oh, yeah. The enhanced interrogation of Dick Cheney and Benjamin Netanyahu. That would make a great stage play. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Ahnaf Ibn Qais discusses “Escalation & Prelude to Total War.” It begins:“The World is on the Brink of Total War.“While it is uncertain what particular sequence will play out to get us all there, it is clear that we are on the cusp of a Nuclear Exchange & are waiting to see how it will manifest soon. If anything, even the ‘Normies’ understand that the DOOM cometh:“The United States of America, that Evil Empire of Lies & Great Satan, has all but ensured that it will be entering the coming War at a grave disadvantage.“Not only will it fight the Sinic, Russian & Islamic worlds simultaneously, but it will also try to do all this ( & more ) while its Industry, Manufacturing & overall Military Prowess are at an all-time low…”Excerpt from the interview:So let's talk about this article from Ahnaf entitled Escalation and Prelude to Total War. Hey, welcome, Ahnaf Ibn Qais. How are you, good sir?Doing well. Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh. Thank you for having me on, good sir.Good to have you back. So, you wrote this a couple of weeks ago, that the world is on the brink of total war. And it isn't any less on the brink now than it was then, is it?Yes, yes. What has happened is that after the assassination of Brother Haniyeh, a lot of rumors were circulating with regard to how exactly it happened. Some were saying it was like a bomb in a guest house. Other people were saying that it was poison. So for the first 72 to about 96 hours or so, I had no clue what was happening.Later on, multiple telegram channels of the geopolitics people that I follow were saying that they got confirmation that actually it wasan ATGM type weapon with a seven kilogram TNT load. So they basically disassembled it, took it inside the country, put it together and shot it right through his window. And that's basically how they took him out.But the reason I bring this up and the reason why it's relevant to our conversation is that this is basically a hostile act on Iranian soil. And the Iranian envoy at the UN Assembly invoked Article 51, which is the article saying that if you're attacked on your home soil, you have the right to self-defense.And that's basically what the Iranian mindset on this thing: look, you've crossed all red lines. You've crossed all boundaries. You've slapped us in the face. You leave us with no choice.And that's basically what's happening in terms of the essay I wrote about two weeks ago. I was writing that right before the assassination, right? So there's a lot of stuff, unfortunately, that happened after it. That being said, I think it's still relevant in the sense that there are a lot of trends I cover in that essay. But in terms of what's pertinent right now on August 9th is that you've got this situation where the Russians have all this military cargo—they've got the IL-76 and all these jets. Basically if you want to carry electronic warfare equipment, the heavy stuff like that, or the S-400 or other related systems, that's the plane you use.And multiple sorties are already happening from Moscow to Tehran and nearby areas. According to one of the OSINT people—these are people who basically spend hours a day looking at air traffic and looking at the skies—there have already been more than 20 sorties back and forth.So just to give our dear listeners an idea of what that actually means, in November to December of 2021, the Russians were doing a similar number of sorties towards the border areas with Ukraine. Now, back then, when people pointed this out—the technology people, the OSINT people—the normies were saying, “oh, well, nothing's going to happen. Russia is just bluffing. Nothing's going to happen.” I think that's wrongheaded and very, very naive. My view always is that you look at what a person does, not what they say. And then you figure out what they're about to do.It's very, very clear what's about to happen. Iran is going to launch a counterattack and it's going to be extremely brutal, based on all these sorties and all the data we're seeing thus far. It might not happen today. It might not happen tomorrow. It might not even happen a few weeks from now, but it is going to happen. And the reason I know this for certain is because of this mass number of sorties.Interesting. So what exactly is being brought into Iran for this purpose?So the Russians have given them the S-400 system. The S-400 is—some people would say, it is the best anti-air system in the world. So if the Americans actually deployed their F-400s to the Israelis or whatnot, the Iranians can actually shoot them down if it comes down to it. Let's say that the Israelis are going to use a bunch of tankers and going to do this really reckless 2000 plus kilometer charge, a mad rush into Iran. If they do something like that…maybe let's say they decide, “okay, we're going to hit Iraq or Lebanon or any of these other places.”You can use the S-400 to actually shoot down the F-16s very easily. The F-22 and F-35 as well.I know that the America bro

Rumble link Bitchute linkJoining us now for the program is Hussein Abu Khaiti, activist and political commentator from Sana'a, and Kevin Barrett, author and Middle East expert, joining us from Missoula, Montana. Gentlemen, I'd like to welcome you both to the broadcast here.I guess we'll start there in the Yemeni capital with you, Hussein. Hope you're doing well this evening. Your initial thoughts about these latest operations against U.S. and Israeli linked or directly owned vessels?Hussein Abu Khaiti: We've seen from the statement of Yahya Saray, the spokesperson of Yemeni army. He has spoken about three targets. One is a commercial ship called Conship Ono, which belongs to a shipping company that has actually violated the Yemeni ban to enter port in occupied Palestine.And the two other attacks have targeted two U.S. destroyers when they were trying to cross the Yemeni army operation zone. They have seen the clear message that any type of military movement from the United States will be faced by those attacks till they stop targeting Yemen. And they should stop as well supporting the Zionist state of Israel. We have noticed that since Yemen has launched and started their attack against Israel and formed a blockade we've seen that the United States could not hold their battleship, and especially their aircraft carrier, in the region.They have actually sent the aircraft carrier Roosevelt, but it's still far away in the Indian Ocean. They are not daring to come close to Yemen. And I believe the Yemeni army who actually started to use anti-ship ballistic missiles, are one of the first armies to start using mass attacks using drones, especially when they did that against Saudi Arabia and against targets in the Red Sea. I think that we have reached the end of an era for the aircraft carrier, because now it's clear that with simple weapons you can stop the United States and their “most powerful aircraft carrier in the world.” Because especially Yemenis (dominate) the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. That's why it's so dangerous for the United States military, either destroyers or aircraft carriers, to operate in our region. And I believe that this type of attack will continue. Of course, the United States will never admit that any of these drones or missiles have hit their target, because at the beginning they have failed to stop the Yemeni attack. They have failed to keep a major presence in in our region like they did at the beginning when they formed the so-called Prosperity Guardian. They had to withdraw their aircraft carrier from our region. That's why I believe they will not actually admit any attack. But at some point I believe that Yemen will be the first country actually to sink a U.S. destroyer, and I'm sure that they are planning to do so.Yemenis have sent a clear message that those attacks will continue as long as United States keep supporting the Zionist state in killing Palestinian people, they will continue their attack on forming a blockade against the Zionist state of Israel.Thank you, Hussein. And before I introduce and welcome Dr. Barrett to the conversation, for our viewers that don't know, the Yemenis have since mid-November, or was it mid-October, started carrying out retaliatory attacks against Israeli-linked vessels. Their argument is that if there's a siege on Gaza and Israelis are not letting humanitarian aid get into the besieged strip, and essential goods that Gazans need for sustenance is denied them, then we're not going to let the Israelis use the waterways that pass right in front of Yemen to receive goods at occupied ports in occupied Palestine.Joining us now is Dr. Barrett from Missoula, Montana. Your thoughts, Dr. Barrett? All the U.S. and U.K. retaliatory attacks against Yemen for going after dozens upon dozens of Israeli-linked vessels have not deterred the Yemenis from standing with Palestinians against this genocide in Gaza.Kevin Barrett: That's right. The Americans have not been able to carry through with their avowed mission to basically control all of the world's seas, keep them open for the shipping that they approve of, and then potentially shut them down any time that they so desire. That's basically the backbone of the supposed current unipolar world order. The United States claims that it has the ability to keep seas open when it wants to and then close them when it wants to. And that sea power has ruled the world since the time of the British Empire.But things are changing now, and the Houthi regime in Yemen, the Ansar Allah movement, is in the forefront of this global change. They have had the courage to take on the world's most powerful empire. One would think that they're severely undermatched, but with the new military technology that allows for the use of these relatively inexpensive rockets and drones that can be used to put pressure on vastly more expensive platforms and incredibly expensive defensive platforms—and then also ultimately the ability to sink these

False Flag Weekly News Rumble link Bitchute link Some of my earliest and most intense memories involve the Olympics. In 1964 I huddled in front of my grandparents’ black-and-white TV to watch Madison, WI newscasters proudly announce that my father had won a silver medal in the Tokyo sailing competition. Though the image quality wasn’t great, we could more-or-less make him out in the clip from the awards ceremony. Then in 1968 it got even better. I attended the Mexico City Olympics sailing games, held in Acapulco, and watch the races from the spectator boat. One of my few unpleasant memories from Acapulco involves lavish quantities of vomit deposited all over the deck by seasick Mexicans who apparently hadn’t realized what they were getting into when they bought that spectator boat ticket. (Many viewers of the current Paris Olympics reacted similarly to its opening ceremony.)Watching the sailboat races, tabulating the results day by day, and gradually realizing that my dad was ever-more-likely to win it all, was the ultimate peak experience for a nine-year-old boy. And sure enough, my father and his sailmaking business partner, Lowell North, won the gold medal in the Star class. This time I was present at the awards ceremony. The national anthem has never sounded better. Indeed, it’s been all downhill since then.But there was a darker side to the 1968 Olympics, one that almost nobody knew about back then: an alleged genocide. According to Wikipedia, “In 2006, former President Luis Echeverría was arrested on charges of genocide” for ordering the massacre of hundreds of peacefully protesting students during the run-up to the games.If ordering the massacre of 300 protestors is genocide, what should we call Israel’s massacres of tens of thousands in Gaza? And yet the Paris Olympics is allowing Israeli athletes to compete, while barring Russians, based on Russia’s relatively restrained war of self-defense in Ukraine. I recently flew back to the US from my home in Morocco to visit family, found myself watching the Olympics on a living room big screen, and almost lost my lunch when the announcer referred to “Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine” as the reason the Russian team was banned. “UNPROVOKED?!” I unleashed a string of expletives, and explained to brainwashed Russophobic family members that one could arguably call the Special Military Operation all sorts of things, but unprovoked is not one of them. That is just a baldface lie. No military operation in history has ever been more provoked.Since that moment I have been boycotting the Paris Olympics. But I can’t completely ignore them. My day job, such as it is, is to offer weekly news roundups on False Flag Weekly News. And the Olympic games, love them or hate them, are definitely news. So instead of watching gymnastic competitions on the big screen while exchanging chitchat with family members, I watched a few clips on the internet and discussed the meaning of it all with FFWN co-host Cat McGuire:-All right, and how about the Hunger Games news? That is, the Olympics, the Satanic Olympics, says Alexander Dugin.It opened...with a pale horse.Behold, a pale horse. The apocalypse has come.Alexander Dugin says that “anyone who does not immediately take up arms to destroy this satanic civilization, unprecedented in its brazenness, is complicit with it.”Right on, Alexander Dugin! Let's look at the depravity that he's talking about here.This is a parody of Da Vinci's Last Supper:They tried to deny it, and then they ended up admitting that, “well, I guess it sort of was.” What a bizarre, sick and twisted ritual. What's that all about, Cat?Well, it's part of their inclusion and diversity. They're really proud of it. And it's a wake-up call, like the genocide by the Israelis.The entire world watches the Olympics. And to see this is just… people are like, “oh my God.” It's like when they finally heard Biden speak.These are huge wake-up calls. These elites have become so arrogant. They think they can put their s**t right out there in public. And they don't know that they've been living in a little circle in their little closed world. And most of the public is not down with that.So what do they do in a typical Judaicized way? They start censoring the video. They do make apologies, but then they censor the video. This is not what we want. And they never explained if they were so proud of it.Why can't anyone see it now? (Note: It’s archived HERE - go to the 10:45 mark.)You can say you're sorry, but still show it.It's just very dangerous, the power that the Olympics has as a cultural event. Bolshevik fascist control totalitarian institutions on the cultural level. They have banned Russia from the games—or the Russian flag, at least, which in semiotics, is like banning the country. If any country should be banned, it's the pariah state of Israel.And this is kind of tasteless, having somebody who looks like a star of a John Waters movie wearing Jesus's halo. I'm not really su

Dr. Alan Sabrosky returns for another “first Friday of the month”appearance. He emailed me:“Let’s do three themes from FFWN:1. Candace Owens and the primacy of Jews to Trump2. Trump & Harris: Fallout of the Butler faux “assassination” attempt3, Middle East tensions grow (how could they not with asymmetrical assassination as a weapon?)”Dr. Alan Sabrosky is the former Head of Strategic Studies at the US Army War College. He expresses his Jewish heritage via cuisine, not foreign policy.Excerpt from the interview:This is indeed the first Friday of the month, which is the day that Dr. Alan Sabrosky comes on to talk about: How can things get any crazier than they were last month? And I'm afraid I can't imagine what it's going to be like next month, because this last month was as nutty as it gets. Where do we even start, Alan?That's a really good question. Just when you think things can't get any worse, they do. Which is one of those intriguing things that makes Murphy's Law seem like the 11th Commandment.I guess there's a couple of things, just a couple of observations, and then I'd like to get into Candace Owens, because I reread the article on her. And I had an odd reaction on the second reading.I guess there are two things from last month. One is the assassination (attempt). I’m very much with Mike Walsh on this, it just doesn't make any sense. None of the official details make any sense. It's almost like it was staged by a grade B studio on a very tight budget, with the keystone cops in attendance who just happened to be (firing) live ammunition and (causing) fatalities.It doesn't make any sense in some very elementary ways. I mean, forget the idea that they saw this guy climbing up on a roof and they didn't do anything for a while. On the rest of it, the notion that someone's ear is nipped—now that's the Hollywood technique (from a) 19th century western… it's not a high velocity bullet. You you tap an ear with a round and it'll take most of the year off. There'll be blood spattered everywhere. Facial and head wounds bleed copiously. Ever cut yourself shaving? I have. You know what the effect of it is. There's blood everywhere, fast, all the way on the side of the head, down the shirt, on the collar. It would be all over. (It’s) not there.Yeah, but he had some really nice warpaint.Yeah. On this side. Not on the side where the bullet hit. Supposedly on the right here. This guy supposedly got off his (8) shots. Now if the first one didn't do the job, why did the other seven just spray around the crowd instead of continuing to shoot at the target, which by then was almost stationary. And the upper part of the chest and the head were fully exposed. I mean, if I were up there… I certainly wouldn’t be negotiating my surrender. That's not going to happen.The thing that struck me immediately after that was that...Sort of like Lee Harvey Oswald . And it was really, really intriguing. And maybe it's real. I don't know. But I can't imagine anyone on the Democrat side seriously wanting him dead. They want him in jail. They want him ruined. They want him off the election trail. Sure, there's that much.But the one thing that could actually incite his base and send them back to their homes to get their ARs and shotguns over the mantelpiece and out of the closet would be to have their Messiah, as it were, the secular Messiah, Donald Trump, be shot and killed by a Democrat agent. That's the one thing that would do it. And so they weren't going to do it. They simply weren't going to do it. And I can't think of anyone else who would.The whole establishment might actually unite on what they don't want. Nobody really wants Trump dead, except for maybe some idiots. But the establishment insiders know that the Democrats don't want Trump dead.Because it would destabilize the country and they would be in Syria.They would be hated.They would be more than hated. More than hate. They would be removed.Right. And the Republican insiders, presumably, at least the Trump loyalists—most of them obviously don't want Trump dead either. At this point, they're just riding their horse, and Trump is the horse. So since both sides don't want Trump dead…Right, but to have him be very, very, very slightly injured and give your company a fist on it, and his anointment guaranteed…Whoever would want that could do it. One of the things is, they let him climb on the roof, they let him take his shots, they killed him so he couldn't talk.Yeah, and I agree, Alan. I think that's the most likely explanation for these bizarre facts that don't really line up any other way.I kept thinking about these things don't make any sense. They simply don't make any sense. I've been through these a number of times before. I was 22 years old when JFK was assassinated. And I remember all of the details that came up at that time, and what we knew at that time and how people reacted to it. And absolutely none of them afterwards ever showed anyone pointing up at the book (deposit

Ron Unz, editor and publisher of the Unz Review, discusses “Donald Trump, Kamala Harris, and the Tottering American Empire.” a useful summary of ongoing ever-more-bizarre developments in American politics. We’ll compare notes on the “Trump shooting” in Butler, Pennsylvania, an issue we sharply disagree on. The likelihood of a major escalation on the West Asian front, in the wake of Israel’s assassinations of Ismail Haniyeh and Fouad Shukur, will also be on the agenda.Excerpts:So yeah, things are not getting any less weird by the week, are they?It's just a very strange time in American politics right now.It certainly is. And the month of July may actually go down in history books as one of the stranger months in presidential politics, won't it?Look, we had—there was a very suspicious assassination attempt against Donald Trump, who was leading in the polls. One of the main presidential candidates and a former president. And he came very close to dying in that assassination attempt, according to all the news media reports. And just a few days afterwards, his opponent, incumbent President Joseph Biden, was suddenly forced to leave the race, being replaced by his vice president.There's never been a case before of somebody winning 99% of the primary delegates and then being forced out of the race by the donors and political operatives in his own party.One of the aspects of your article that some might push back against would be: They would say, well, that's true, Ron. It seems very undemocratic that Biden would get virtually all the primary votes and then the donors and oligarchs would just force him out. However, the polls show that everybody approves of that, that all the Democrats almost unanimously approve of the oligarchs doing this to them. So what does that tell you about the voters?Well, I mean, it basically shows, you know, that certainly would be the case. For example, if another candidate had simply been picked by fiat and if the media, the Democratic leading media, had all endorsed that choice, I think it's very possible that most of the democratic-leaning public would have supported it. The truth is, Kamala Harris was an extremely unsuccessful presidential candidate when she ran. One of the points I made in my article was that when she ran for the nomination— she'd been elected U.S. Senator from the state of California—she checked off every diversitarian box. She's half South Asian, half Caribbean black. Her husband is Jewish. And so she ended up being regarded as one of the leading presidential candidates on the Democratic side in the primaries. She raised $43 million. She was one of the strongest fundraisers except for Bernie Sanders. And yet she did so badly with the actual voters in the Democratic primaries that she ended up dropping out of the race before the first vote was cast in Iowa, and got zero delegates.So in other words, she clearly ran the most unsuccessful presidential campaign in American history. But again, the donors and the operatives then persuaded Biden to put her on the ticket. And that's why she's vice president and might end up being president in another few months.It is all very strange. But again, for me, the strangest part is the acquiescence of the public, especially the Democrats that don't seem to have that much of a problem with it. Of course, there are so many things that they should have problems with that they don't. But how do you explain that? Kamala Harris has never been very popular. As you pointed out, her campaign was a complete fiasco. Nobody particularly liked her as vice president, including the Democrats. But now the polls seem to be showing that the people are not up in arms about this, to say the least. So do you think the media is succeeding in spinning this in such a way that they're basically bringing people on board with what they're doing?I mean, that's certainly an aspect of it. The other thing is also Joseph Biden was an extremely unpopular president and was widely regarded as likely to lose to Donald Trump. A lot of people think that the reason he was kept on the ballot for the primaries, even though he was so unpopular and based on his debate performance and other statements since then really lost most of his mental facilities, was to prevent any open debate in the Democratic primaries.So much of the Democratic base, the primary electorate, is so outraged with the position of the Biden administration on the Middle East, on the Israel-Gaza conflict, that if Biden had not been involved in the race as the incumbent, there might have been a very sharply contested battle among several candidates, one or two of which might have decided to go for the support of the base of the party by coming out with a different Middle Eastern policy.So the Democratic Party apparatus, the donor class, the political operatives decided to sort of drag Biden across the finish line, since as the incumbent president, he would probably be able to win nearly all of the delega

Rumble link Bitchute linkKevin Barrett, editor at Veterans Today, is joining us out of Missoula. Hello, Dr. Barrett. Always a pleasure to check in with you. Your thoughts on the martyrdom of the top political chief of Hamas in Tehran by the Israeli regime?Ismail Haniyeh was one of the greatest figures of our time. And that's, of course, why they went out of their way to martyr him. He was part of the resistance that is not going to go away and allow this slow motion genocide to proceed. It's standing up against genocide, exposing the genocide that's actually been going on in faster and slower spurts since 1948.And this latest round of resistance that he was part of will be long remembered as the beginning of the end of the Zionist entity. The Zionist entity has gone insane, and they have revealed themselves as the enemies of all humanity. The vast majority of the people of this planet now see that. And it won’t be long before we see the final results. How much suffering there will be in the meantime, I don't know.But God bless Ismail Haniyeh, and God bless the people of the Islamic Republic of Iran for standing strong and being willing to take this kind of horrific, insane abuse from this monstrous, psychopathic entity squatting in occupied Palestine. It needs to be eradicated immediately. And we need people all over the world to figure out how to help do that. It can't all just fall on the current axis of resistance countries. The entire Islamic world knows this. The intelligent people in the Christian world know this. The whole global south knows this. Russia and China know this. The vast majority of the world knows that the genocidal Zionist entity needs to be put out of its misery and forced to stop spreading misery in the region and throughout the world.And Dr. Barrett, why do you think this is the case that the whole world wants to see a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, has been pushing for one—Ismail Haniyeh was trying to negotiate one—and that he met this fate? Everybody wants to see a cessation of hostilities. They want to see entry of aid into Gaza. These were things that were topping the agenda when it came to Palestinians not martyring their top official. Why do you think the Israelis chose this narrative and path?They must be incredibly desperate. I think they know that their time is numbered and they're getting ready for their Samson option. They're spreading death and murder and mayhem and torture. They're proud rapists. The Israeli people are forming these huge demonstrations for the right to rape, because they say that in a Jewish state, there's no such thing as rape of non-Jews, and therefore, this isn't rape, it's not a crime.This is like the people of Sodom or Ahl Lut, except worse. And they're murdering people like Ismail Haniyeh precisely because they need to keep the war going. And by they, I don't know if I mean every single decision maker in Zionist entity, but certainly the current leadership around Netanyahu and his psychopathic, genocidal, lunatic co-workers, Smotrich and Ben-Gavir. Those people need to keep the war going for their own political reasons. And so they'll murder the person that they're supposed to be negotiating peace with.Now, when somebody murders a peace negotiator, it's obvious that that side has no interest in peace. So this puts the onus of the soon-to-be-created ceasefire, inshallah, on the Zionists. They've proven that they're not interested. Now the whole world needs to unite and accept that reality and then force the Zionists to back down using whatever means are necessary.And with the assassination of Fouad al-Shukri and the Hezbollah commander in Beirut the previous night and Ismail Haniyeh the following morning, where does that leave the region? And what is Israel trying to do with the region with these actions?Murdering Fuad Shukr, and then immediately after that, killing the person they're supposed to be negotiating with—these people have gone insane. And I think maybe Netanyahu is demonstrating that he thinks he owns the Americans. He just went to America, and he convinced a bunch of shameful traitors and stooges of genocide to give him some sort of hero's welcome. But in fact, he's the worst war criminal of the 21st century, if not of all time.And so I think that Netanyahu wants to stay out of jail. Ben-Gvir and Smotrich want to slaughter all the Palestinians and tear down the Al-Aqsa Mosque and put up a blood sacrifice temple. These people are all insane. And the thing is, Netanyahu is going to be in jail as soon as the war ends. So whether he's arrested for his corruption charges, which he was just about to be thrown in jail for when this war broke out, whether he's arrested for possibly being somehow complicit or at least grossly negligent on the Israeli side of October 7th, whether he's arrested for the most horrific war crimes of the century…Though I don't know if the Israelis are going to arrest him for that because they're all a whole country of

Rumble linkThaddeus Kozinski recently published one of his most popular essays: “Seeking ‘well-being’ instead of God as our goal will lead to hell.” He asserts that “The totalitarians ruling us are satanists, whether officially or not, and they want to abuse us to such an extent that we no longer ask questions in the mode of salvation…There are only two paths in life, the one that leads to heaven and the one that leads to hell. And there are only two modes of living, salvation and well-being.”In the interview, Kozinski discusses the “satanic” Olympics opening and responds to Laurent Guyénot’s dismissal of “satanic panic” on last week’s show.Excerpt:“It's not as if the pursuit of wellbeing is evil in itself. I mean, it's something we do, and we're supposed to. We're supposed to desire goods—worldly goods, emotional goods, earthly goods. But the problem here—and this is sort of Plato's insight— we have a deep existential and spiritual desire for something more than just feeling good or being happy in the contemporary sense. We have a longing for something that transcends all that.“And the different religions, especially the monotheistic religions, tell us what this is and how to get there. And sometimes it's at odds with the pursuit of immanent, worldly, therapeutic kind of wellbeing. And when it's at odds, that's when this choice comes of how we should live. And sometimes we have to put wellbeing second and put something else first. And it's kind of mysterious what this is, what we're searching for, but we call it, God, salvation, and heaven and the spiritual life and the cross in Christianity.“And I think that the main theme of the article has to do with truth. Truth is very important. So how does one value the truth of things? And most people would say, “yeah, I want to know the truth. I'm interested in the truth.” Well, here's the thing. Are you interested in the truth no matter what? Is it first? Is it your priority at all times? Are you willing to even die for it, sacrifice for it? And as I argue in the essay, it seems like our culture is sort of very systematically, deliberately oriented to cultivate in the citizens of the world, in the West especially, the tendency to not put truth first—to be willing to sacrifice it to something else.“And this is really the most damning thing you can do, I argue in the article.” This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble linkPhilip Kraske discusses his new set-in-Morocco play How Far Casablanca. Unlike the Bogart-Bacall film, it is not romantic war propaganda set in an exotic location, but rather a black comedy involving outrageous media lies covering up horrendous crimes of state (a genre Kraske has mined more than once). The underlying theme involves naive America, psychopathic Israel, and long-suffering Palestine. It’s a tight, well-constructed effort. If I ever teach a college class on red-pilled literature—an ever-unlikelier prospect—I’ll put this one on the syllabus.We’ll also talk about Phil’s articles on RFK Jr.’s prospects and perceptions of Putin and Russia.Philip Kraske is an expatriate American novelist, playwright, poet, and language teacher.Excerpt:“Kevin, you and I always exaggerate the interest of Americans in foreign policy. Yes, people don't like the images on TV. Yes, people say, oh, this is awful, Israelis can't do this. But number one, the mainstream media gives them a very sanitized version of what's going on. And second, what goes on beyond American shores…I mean, Every time I go back to America, it's just the same. The moment I start talking, even with educated people—the moment I start talking about what's going on in Europe (I live in Spain), what's going on in Spain, what's going on in the world, what's going on with President Putin, about how I think he's somewhat vilified, there's just no interest. It's like something that happens on Mars. Very sad, but that's the reality.“And I have a feeling that Kennedy looks at it the same way. Yeah, everybody hates what's going on with Gaza, but when it comes to voting, when it comes to really worrying about it, well, it's a lot of university students who are making a lot of trouble and things like that. I just don't think it registers with the general public. It has to be like pretty close to nuclear war or a 9-11 before people sort of wake up and say, ooh, God almighty…” This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkSystems Neuroscientist Ph.D. Kevin McCairn of the Korea Brain Research Institute joins Jewish interfaith dialogue specialist Doooovid and I to discuss red pill issues including COVID origins. (As regular viewers/listeners know, I think COVID emerged from a US bio-attack on China and Iran.)Kevin McCairn is the co-author of “An open debate on SARS-CoV-2’s proximal origin is long overdue” among other papers. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkWyatt Peterson, author of the book Perfidy of Zion and the article “October 7 in Context”, returns to discuss his new article “Parallels: JFK, RFK & 9/11.” In light of the apparent Trump assassination attempt, Wyatt provides some interesting historical context:“How many Americans are aware that the Jewish Secretary of the Confederate States, Judah P. Benjamin, was a close confidant of both John Surratt—a man accused of plotting Lincoln’s murder in partnership with John Wilkes Booth—and the Rothschild family of Europe?”“In the spring of 1977 George de Mohrenschildt was found dead from a shotgun blast to the head after publicly complaining that ‘the Jewish mafia’ was trying to kill him for writing a memoir about his former friend Lee Harvey Oswald titled I Am A Patsy! I Am a Patsy!” “In his 2018 best-selling book Rise and Kill First: The Secret History of Israel’s Targeted Assassinations, Israeli journalist Ronen Bergman reveals that Israeli Military Intelligence had been working on a program the month before Robert Kennedy’s assassination to hypnotize and program Palestinian prisoners to kill PLO leader Yasser Arafat…Almost everybody today who’s familiar with the facts of the case, including RFK’s son Robert Kennedy Jr, acknowledges that (Palestinian-American) Sirhan Sirhan was under the influence of hypnosis when Bobby Kennedy was killed and couldn’t possibly have fired the fatal shot.” This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkOn this week’s False Flag Weekly News I experienced a sign of cognitive decline: “sudden shouting.”My outbursts of “sudden shouting,” also known as ranting, were occasioned by astonishment and anger at the audacity of the “Trump shooting” hoax and the gullibility of those who believe it. We have seen some bad magic tricks before—pathetic efforts to convince us that Oswald shot Kennedy from the Book Depository with the world’s worst rifle, or that the Twin Towers and Building 7 blew up due to modest office fires—but the claim that Trump was shot in the ear may be the most hilariously ludicrous history-steering hoax ever.As I wrote a few days ago, if Trump had gotten his bloody 7/13 coronation PR stunt through sheer luck, he would have defied odds equivalent to winning the lottery. What are the odds that the first-ever amateur to attempt to shoot Trump at a rally would manage to squeeze off any bullets? Maybe 1 in 1000 at best. Normally, security would nail him long before he could shoot. And if the lone nut defied those odds and somehow managed to bring a weapon to within a kilometer or two of a rally, what are the chances that his bullets would travel anywhere near Trump? Essentially zero, if the Secret Service were doing its job. But let’s say our first-ever lone nut Trump rally gunman managed to defy all those odds and somehow took a few shots at Trump from a viable sniper’s perch about 500 feet away, as Thomas Matthew Crooks allegedly did, thanks to hilariously unbelievable “Secret Service incompetence.” What are the odds that he would manage to “graze Trump’s ear” in such a way as to create blood for the photo op, without doing any serious damage? If this story were true, which it obviously isn’t, never in all of human history has an ostensible shooting victim been luckier to have been shot in the head.Crooks didn’t manage to blow Trump’s brains out, but the fabulators who concocted this ridiculous story sure did manage to blow America’s brains out. They must be rolling on the floor laughing with dupers’ delight as they feed us hilariously fake “evidence” that the shooting was real. Consider the “magic bullet” photo op. The original “magic bullet”—the one that allegedly passed through John F. Kennedy and John Connolly several times, stopping occasionally to make sharp turns, before materializing perfectly intact on a stretcher—is a national joke. But at least the JFK assassination magic bullet didn’t pose for a photo op! The “Trump ear shot” magic bullet, which obviously never existed, felt the need to offer risible proof of its alleged existence by allowing itself to be photographed. Another miracle! Without that photo, there would be no evidence that any actual bullet came close to Trump. (The odds that a photographer would succeed in catching a shot like that are once again in win-the-lottery territory; the photo has been called “a one in a million shot” but the real odds are probably considerably lower.)And if you thought the “Trump earshot magic bullet” was uproariously funny “proof” that Trump was shot in the ear with a 5.556 mm bullet traveling over 2000 miles an hour, get a load of the long-overdue but now finally released “medical report”! It’s written by an ultra-Trump-loyalist “doctor” (possibly unlicensed) who appears to make Groucho Marx’s horse-doctor-turned neurologist Hugo Z. Hackenbush look like a paradigm of medical integrity:A spokesperson for the congressman did not immediately provide a response when asked about the status of his license, and Trump campaign’s did not immediately respond to questions.Jackson has come under considerable scrutiny. After administering a physical to Trump in 2018, he drew headlines for extolling the then-president’s “incredibly good genes” and suggesting that “if he had a healthier diet over the last 20 years he might live to be 200 years old.”In 2001 (sic - should be 2021 -KB) the Department of Defense inspector general released a scathing report on his conduct as a top White House physician that found Jackson had made “sexual and denigrating” comments about a female subordinate, violated the policy on drinking alcohol on a presidential trip and took prescription-strength sleeping medication that prompted worries from his colleagues about his ability to provide proper medical care.Sounds like just the doctor to convince people like Keith Olbermann, among others who have been demanding an official, well-documented medical report and calling Trump a liar. If Trump’s personal Dr. Hackenbush is the only medical professional they can find to attest to Trump’s alleged bullet injury, that pretty much seals the deal right there, doesn’t it?Experts who are not Trump loyalist quacks universally admit that Trump’s ear almost certainly cannot have been struck by a 5.556 mm bullet traveling over 2000 miles an hour, leaving only the minor injury that Dr. Quackenbush described. Once again quoting the AP story on the medical report: “If a bulle

Rumble link Bitchute linkLaurent Guyénot, author of From Yahweh to Zion, discusses his two new French-language articles “Hollywood, CIA, Epstein, Pizzagate : Check out the Documentary Out of Shadows ” and “Manufacturing False Memories and the MK Ultra File.” (Non-francophones can cut and paste the text into Google translate to get a sense of their contents.) We’ll also discuss the apparent Trump shooting. Spoiler: Laurent agrees with my interpretation.Laurent wrote me to ask about Islam’s interpretation of Satan and satanism, adding:“I’ll have to state from the start that I don’t believe that Satan exists, except as a collective Idea. There was no satan before christianity. I’m a stoic: evil is ignorance.In a nutshell, my general opinion is:– Satanism in pop culture is like pornography: a way to destroy the youth. Those who promote this do not believe in or worship satan. They believe in Yahweh or in the self-chosenness.– Satanic ritual abuse is, to a large extent, a psychiatric phenomenon of « false memories » produced in psychotherapy: this position attracts me a lot of insults, but I’ve been studying the topic for twenty years.– the notion that the world is rule by pedosatanic people is a psyop of Q-Anon. In real life, there are pedophiles, and child prostitution.– The idea that satan rules the world is the smartest way to destroy the real dissident movement. To control people by fear, there is no better tool than Satan.– There are a lot of crazy people in the conspiracy world who, when they run out of topics, speak about Satan. It makes them look courageous and deep, and it impresses gullible people.” This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkPlease note that this is not the actual broadcast, which is in Farsi. The interviewer is doing a running translation from Farsi, which is why the word choice and delivery are not “broadcast quality.” It’s also the reason I speak unusually slowly, in hopes of making the translator’s job easier.IRINNWhen we see these pictures from Palestine, this bloodshed, this genocide, it seems that it is a very catastrophic situation and that unfortunately international organizations are keeping silent about this matter.The international reaction to this genocide is bifurcated. It's split between the people—the majority of people worldwide deplore this genocide—and the leadership class in the West, and in the part of the world dominated by or intimidated by the United States leadership, The leaders have been largely complicit with only pro forma protests. And the scale of this catastrophe is beyond what has been reported. The Lancet just estimated there have likely been 186,000 or more Palestinian deaths, which credits Ralph Nader's estimate in March of something approaching 200,000 deaths.This is just a completely unimaginable genocide. And the American empire has so far had the power to allow it to continue. Every day we can see different attacks on different hospitals in Gaza Strip. Why can we not see any international reactions? Well, in the United States and to some extent in Europe, the people are not seeing this. They're certainly not seeing it on mainstream news channels, except in very, very small doses. The younger people are seeing it on TikTok and social media. And that's why young people in the West are motivated to protest against this genocide. But the mainstream media in the West is dominated by Zionists. It's owned by Zionist billionaires. And it has grossly downplayed this genocide, to the point that the owners of Western mainstream media are arguably guilty of complicity in genocide. They ought to be tried, condemned, and executed.I want to talk about Mr. Senator Vance as Vice President for Donald Trump. And when we look at the stance and political positions of Mr. Vance, it seems that this man is a supporter of Israel.Senator Vance is a strong supporter of this genocide, and he could not have been chosen for this role if he were not. Donald Trump has reportedly been offered $100 million by Miriam Adelson, as well as presumably large sums from other Zionist billionaires, in exchange for his green-lighting the continuation of this genocide, and perhaps even the acceleration of it beyond what we're seeing now. So it is not surprising that Trump's vice presidential choice would be another ultra-genocidal Republican.Kevin, we are witnessing Israel continuously doing satanic actions against Palestinian girls, Palestinian boys, with large numbers of Palestinians killed by the Israeli regime. At the same time, when we look at NATO's (human rights) stance in the era of Moammar Qaddafi in Libya, NATO has a strict stance against Moammar Qaddafi. But about Benjamin Netanyahu, they keep silent. Yes, well, Qaddafi was an independent leader who was actually opposed to Zionism. And the Zionists, with their power in the West, can decide when one leader needs to be publicly executed and another leader is allowed to get away with genocide. Obviously, NATO has a grotesque double standard in terms of what it claims are criminals in leadership positions.NATO is just a euphemism for the American occupation of Europe. So the powers in control of the American empire will lie and propagandize and try to justify their actions, which are based on raw Machiavellian power calculations. They don't care about human rights and they don't care about the worst genocidal crimes if those crimes are being committed by their allies.After military actions by IRGC against Israeli regime three or four months ago, at the same time, we’ve seen lots of US students protest in different universities of America. What should Islamic countries do against the Israeli regime?I think it's very hard for the leadership of the occupied Islamic countries, that is, Islamic countries under the influence of the American empire, such as the country I live in, Morocco. It's very hard for the leadership of these countries to provide open support for the Palestinians. However, one hopes that the leaders of these countries are finding ways to provide covert support for the Palestinians. We know that there is a lot of covert support for Palestine and the resistance coming from all over the Arab world. And one certainly hopes that the leadership in Arab countries are looking the other way and encouraging, not just allowing, but encouraging this kind of help. And we certainly hope that sooner rather than later, the Palestinian resistance will obtain the kinds of weapons that it needs to once and for all put an end to the genocidal Zionist occupation of Palestine.Mr. Kevin, recently I was in North Africa, in Algeria. It seems that majority of Af

Rumble link Bitchute linkCat McGuire and I broadcast yesterday’s False Flag Weekly News just a few hours before Donald Trump’s ear was apparently struck by a bullet during a rally in Pennsylvania. According to the official story, an apparent lone nut named Thomas Matthew Crooks took several shots at Trump, piercing his ear with one of them and killing one person and wounding another, before being shot dead by the Secret Service.According to a BBC interview, a man with a rifle spent several minutes crawling across a roof, in plain view of witnesses who kept screaming at the Secret Service and pointing out the shooter. Elon Musk, among others, is demanding the resignation of the head of that Secret Service detail.Coincidentally, our FFWN broadcast had just cast the US presidential elections as a bad horror movie, described the Biden regime as a zombie presidency, and speculated about how long it would be before the zombie-in-chief (or his candidacy) keels over dead. Also coincidentally, we had noted that Israel and its assets are pulling out all the stops to put Trump back in power, preferably with a big mandate, so he can greenlight “finishing the job” of the Palestinian genocide.Those are the bare-bones facts. Now let’s consider the historical context. While there may arguably have been a few cases where angry, politicized lone nuts have taken potshots at presidents or candidates, the vast majority of such shootings have been professional operations involving one faction or another of the Deep State. The Kennedys, for example, were removed from power by the state of Israel and an allied hardline faction in the US security community. As for unsuccessful attempts, when John Hinckley Jr. shot President Reagan, he did so on behalf of the Bush crime family, as members of the Reagan Administration knew at the time according to insider witness Barbara Honegger. If the Trump shooting was, like most such events, a Deep State operation of one kind or another, let’s flesh out the implications. First, could it have been a genuine attempt to kill Trump? That seems highly unlikely. If Deep State professionals decide to kill Trump, they would use a plan with a high probability of success, like poison, a plane crash, or a “bulletproof” shooting plot like those that killed the Kennedys. (Dealy Plaza was awash in crossfire from top-level marksmen, while RFK was killed from pointblank range by a handgun pressed against the back of his skull. In neither case was there any realistic chance that the gunmen would miss.)Having someone shoot at Trump and miss would be a surefire way to enhance Trump’s chances of winning, while providing “life insurance” by riling up Trump supporters to the point that another attempt on Trump’s life might unleash social unrest. That’s why anti-Trump pros wouldn’t take the chance.So…cui bono? Obviously the way the shooting played out benefits Trump enormously. So if the spectacle was arranged by pros, they must have been pro-Trump pros. Keep an eye on any Secret Service guys who resign. Will they enjoy a lifestyle way above what one would expect on a government pension? Or will they disappear and live lavish lifestyles under new identities, with none of us the wiser?Gordon Duff, a Marine Corps trained marksman, master gunsmith and retired CIA “troubleshooter,” posted the following:Cue Bono – Who BenefitsTimingMetal detectors at all Trump rallysThe rest is all a Hollywood fake just like 9/11 and all those Syrian gas attacks and several of the school attacks but we won’t say which ones for obvious reasons, ask Alex JonesWe expected this, a Mossad false flag to save Trump from being beaten by Kamala who is polling ahead of him.Sad that we had to see this kind of cheap theatre…no it can’t be anything elseWhat we saw:Fireworks followed by a preplanned face gesture then ducking to the ground where his face was cut.The rest of it, patsys as usual. Watch it play out, it will be totally predictable.So most likely this was a false flag by Israel and its assets in the US security and organized crime communities. The only other realistic possibility is that the Secret Service just happened to royally screw up and allow some amateur to take potshots and pierce Trump’s ear (will he start wearing a bullet earring?) There is absolutely no way this could have been a professional assassination attempt by an anti-Trump Deep State faction. If and when one of those happens, it won’t just leave Orangeman with an ear piercing. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkRichard Falk, Princeton International Law Professor Emeritus, returns to Truth Jihad Radio to discuss his recent article on Biden's worldview (and competence or lack thereof), and the Gaza genocide.Memorable quote: "The Netanyahu invitation (to once again address a Joint Session of Congress) is an edifying metaphor that confirms the dark foreboding of skeptics like myself critical of the US global role since the end of the Cold War and deeply pessimistic about the future of the country."Richard Falk has been repeatedly and ineptly attacked for daring to come on my show and discuss third-rail topics. He has positively reviewed David Ray Griffin's work on 9/11, served as UN Special Rapporteur to Palestine, and earned a reputation as an accomplished American academician of rare courage and integrity.Rough transcript:I am overjoyed to welcome back to the show a guest who's been on several other times and has been attacked by the usual suspects for even having the temerity, nay, the unmitigated audacity to talk to me. And that is Princeton International Law Professor Emeritus Richard Falk, one of the heroes of the American Academy, a truth seeker, truth speaker, and a man of integrity…so welcome, Richard Falk. It's great to have you back.Good to be with you, Kevin. You've been doing a good job for a long time.Well, thank you. I appreciate that. And that quote will undoubtedly be used against you by the New York Sun.They can have it.Okay. So...I'm not quite sure where to start, but I guess we could mention that you've been continually publishing very good, balanced, accurate commentaries on various topics. And most recently, you have a piece on Biden's worldview, the elections, the fact that Netanyahu is coming back to address a joint session of Congress, and that all this bodes ill for America and the world, and that you're feeling rather pessimistic. And I'm pretty sure you're not the only one. So maybe you could tell us how that feels.Well, it doesn't feel as lonely as it might have felt a year or so ago. I think there's a lot of skepticism about how the Democrats are running their campaign, (with) a mentally challenged president who won't step aside, even for the benefit of the country, of having a candidate that has a good chance against Trump.And a Democratic Party that doesn't want to talk about what the U.S. is doing in the world. It wants to proclaim, with some justification, what the Biden presidency has done in the United States by way of social programs and basically a liberal agenda. But that's not the whole story, given the futile and destructive war in Ukraine and the genocidal attacks on the Palestinian people in Gaza, and the spillover to the West Bank.Do you think that what there is of democracy in America has gotten disconnected from these global issues, almost as if there's a deep state running these global issues in a profoundly mendacious and almost psychopathic way, and that the democratic process such as it is, and the official institutions under the constitutional arrangements, don't really have a whole lot of effect?Yes, I think there is a considerable element of seeking to exclude the citizenry from the conduct of foreign policy. And you notice, especially in the Gaza-Israel context, that if you repeated the views of citizens, policy would be much different and more balanced. I had highlighted the invitation to Netanyahu as a way of illustrating the extremity of the alienation of the government from the public. And it's correlated with a Supreme Court that has violated some of the most fundamental principles of what was thought to be a constitutional republic, placing the head of state above the law and freeing private sector interests from substantial regulation.So you have a kind of new new hidden plutocracy of the wealthy that extends to the private sector and is very well represented, overrepresented in bureaucracy and drives the country toward exaggerating foreign threats and trying to maintain through militarist policies, the world as it was after the collapse of the Soviet Union, back in 1991. And putting in effect, the US as in charge of managing global power, and excluding any shared management of the sort that existed during the Cold War. The US wants to have sole authority to act outside its borders with impunity while holding Russia and China fully accountable to the supposed principles of international law. So it's an imperial foreign policy that is sustained by the weakness of the UN and the fact that the UN was actually designed to be weak. The most powerful countries being givena veto power, which in effect tells them they don't have to obey international law or the UN Charter. The primacy of geopolitics, in other words, when strategic interests get in the way, has made it possible but not tenable for the US and the other liberal democracies to support genocide in Gaza and to at the same time condemn Russia for a very provoked attack on Ukraine,

Rumble link Bitchute linkEurope is going anti-Semitic. What's with that? Let's start with Britain. That's the latest election. So many elections happening, it's hard to keep them all straight. Sir Keir Starmerstein, or whatever his name is, just won a historic victory. And the historic victory was basically the Jewish oligarchs', who destroyed the UK's Labour Party over so-called anti-Semitism and are now returning to support genocide. But Jeremy Corbyn somehow still won a seat. So what's your take on this, Mike?Well, it's a cautionary tale. The upshot of the Washington Post piece is if you obliterate your own culture or your political party, we will reward you by getting you elected. So it's a huge step backward. And it seems to be the opposite of what's happening in the rest of Europe at this time.Everywhere else, everything's up for grabs. The so-called far right is menacing us! But in Britain, this totally Zionist “centerist” faction that recaptured Labour from the real Labour Party of Jeremy Corbyn has engineered a landslide victory for the Jewish right to commit genocide against non-Jews.This poll showed the pro-Jew genocide candidates won vastly more seats than the anti-genocide candidates:There are only five winning anti-genocide candidates, but one of them was Jeremy Corbyn. So he's back, but he would be the prime minister if it weren't for the Jewish oligarchs.It's been England's fatal embrace. Barbara Tuchman wrote a book called The Bible and the Sword about how England became Jewish somewhere along the line. This has been the curse of England. With the Reformation, the ruling elite became the people who treated the English people like Palestinians or Goyim or however you want to talk about it. And they've been this kind of crypto-Jewish elite for a long time now. The clearest example of this was Puritanism.When you turn against the church, as the Church of England did, there's only one place to go. So you go to the Old Testament and you become a crypto-Jew. And these are the people that founded our country. So we have inherited this curse, if you want to call it that.I think you're onto something with that analysis, Mike. And of course, they're accusing Starmer of taking time off from his busy job on Friday evenings to keep the Sabbath and visit his Jewish friends. Apparently his wife is Jewish and he's sort of quasi-Jewish himself. He goes to the synagogue. So there's this big hysteria about anti-Semitism because Tories were saying that maybe we can't trust this guy to be on the job Friday night. What if Putin attacks us while Starmer’s off keeping the Sabbath? That’s an anti-Semitism scandal there, just like there was when they got rid of Corbyn.Yeah, they can't get away from it and they can't understand it either. That's the whole problem because England is the most anti-Catholic country in the world. It has always been the most anti-Catholic country in the world, because the creation of the new England called the Reformation was basically the theft of church property. And the oligarchs never wanted to give that property back. It was that simple.So you had the same families like the Russell family, all these families that go back to that theft. Cromwell lived in a house that was stolen from the Dominicans, and he's never going to give it back. And so when you have this negative identity, you're naturally going to be moved in this direction. And as I said, the tragedy is that we speak English, and we have a congenital weakness when it comes to this type of thinking.I'm afraid so. So Jeremy Corbyn was really swimming against the tide when he tried to run as a British Labour candidate rather than a Jewish oligarch backed Labour candidate. And the majority of the Labour voters, if they weren't being totally brainwashed by vast piles of Jewish billionaire money, might have different views.Here's a piece from the Times of Israel pointing out that a whole lot of labor supporters are alienated by this “centrism” on Gaza, meaning tolerance of genocide.Right. I love that word, centrism. I love that word. Center of what? Of course, the Jewish newspaper gets to define the center, which is invariably in their interest. Classic, classic. The English are now in a battle. They have this guy, Tommy Robinson, who is a total Muslim basher in the pay of the Jewish oligarchs to basically steer the working class, the soccer hooligans, the yabos.Did you say the sucker hooligans?Yeah. (Steer them) into the Israel camp by demonizing Muslims. And we know people over there. I know a guy interviewed me, Nick Cotton. He goes to Speaker's Corner, which is a venerable institution where they try to claim they have freedom of speech. And he tries to wake the people up to the fact that this anti-Muslim campaign is basically the oligarch campaign to keep you on the Jewish reservation.Last week we talked about this latest Tommy Robinson scandal in Canada. Tommy ran out of money for his cocaine and sex worker fund. And so he he

Rumble link Bitchute linkDr. Peter McCullough, author of Courage to Face Covid-19 and CEO of The Wellness Company, returns to Truth Jihad Radio to update us on current research on whether those mRNA vaccines were really “safe and effective.” We’ll start out by discussing Dr. McCullough’s new article “Association Between COVID-19 Vaccination and Development of Alzheimer’s Disease.” It seems a Korean study just found “an increased incidence of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) in vaccinated individuals, particularly those receiving mRNA vaccines, within three months post-vaccination.” (Maybe Biden shouldn’t have gotten boosted before that debate…)I wrote to Dr. McCullough: “If the vaccines were remotely ‘safe and effective’ we would expect the vaxxed to be doing significantly better than the unvaxxed. If the opposite is the case, as this study suggests, something is obviously badly wrong. The same problem seems to be cropping up in other vaxxed-vs.-unvaxxed comparisons. If you could offer an overview for my audience, that would be great.”Coincidentally, on the day of our interview, the New York Times published what may be its most upfront acknowledgment of vaccine injuries yet: “Darrell Currie’s life-changing illness: ‘It felt like a bomb went off in my brain.’” From the NYT:As he has gone deeper into the investigation and more tests have been done, the belief his illness is related to the virus or the subsequent three vaccines he took has grown stronger.“After the first vaccine I got terrible tinnitus in my ears within 12 hours, so it was definitely a side-effect,” he says. “I went to see my GP and they said there weren’t any (known side-effects) at the time, as it was so new. The media were some of the first to get the vaccines as we were allowed to travel and work. I questioned whether I should take another but I did, as I had to work.“This is possibly the start of the story. After the second and third vaccines I had weird feelings — pins and needles up my arms, across my face, it felt like my tongue was vibrating, my jaw was hardly moving and I had headaches. Now doctors say those are signs of mild allergic reactions.“Did the Covid vaccines potentially affect my immune system and so, when I then got Covid, could my body not react? Was it immune failure, attacking itself? A lot of doctors I am seeing now feel that is what happened.”Currie has waited to speak about his suffering partly because he was concerned about the tone of the conversation around Covid vaccines and the attention it could attract.Here is an uncharitable interpretation of “waiting to speak out due to concerns about tone etc.”Will the New York Times eventually apologize to people like Peter McCullough, who has been highlighting vaccine risks ever since the rollout? Don’t hold your breath. Selection from my interview with Peter McCullough:Thanks for having me, and it's great to join.Yeah, great to have you back. It's been, I think, like a year and a half or something. And during that time, I think your position on these COVID issues has been confirmed by more and more information, scientific studies and other things. The truth about COVID now is leaking out even into the mainstream. The “safe and effective” thing, which we were all skeptical of from the get-go (is on its last legs). You had more information than I did, but even I was skeptical enough to not get vaxxed. It was experimental, new technology they couldn't possibly have tested properly. There were a lot of reasons to want to wait and be in the control group. And I'm so glad I did, partly because I listened to people like you.Now we look back at the “safe and effective” rhetoric from the COVID era, and we have studies coming in like this Korean one that you just wrote about showing links between COVID-vaccination and the development of Alzheimer's. Peter, correct me if I'm wrong here, but if these vaccines are safe and effective, they should be mitigating COVID infections, meaning that the harms associated from COVID infections should be less. And therefore, if you run this vaxxed-versus-unvaxxed study, you should find that the vaxxed people should be doing better. They should have less Alzheimer's, less cognitive impairment. But in fact, it looks like the opposite is the case. That's really concerning. Is the mainstream going to have to face up to this, and if so, when?The mainstream media—there is a tsunami of adverse data reports that are coming in. Remember, at the time the mainstream media proclaimed the vaccines were safe and effective, when they were released December 10th, 2020, there was only one month for the primary series to be administered—this was Pfizer—and two months of observation. No one knew at month four or five or six what was going to happen. No one could have known.Think about this. How could they possibly say that they were safe and effective when there was no time to understand if they were safe and effective? And then before w

'Rumble link Bitchute linkFirst hour: Dr. Alan Sabrosky returns for another “first Friday of the month” appearance. Today's topic menu, borrowed from this week's False Flag Weekly News stories: (1) DNC campaign to oust Biden has failed. (2) Candace Owens questions 9/11 official story—and points finger at Israel. (3) Panicking MSM says RFK Jr. groped dog and ate babysitter (or was it the other way around?) . We'll also discuss "Doc" Sabrosky's latest article: "Deadly Delusions: When the Plans Work All Too Well."Dr. Alan Sabrosky is the former Head of Strategic Studies at the US Army War College. He expresses his Jewish heritage via cuisine, not foreign policy. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Last week the MSM reported on the public release of videos linking Omar al-Bayoumi, “a Saudi national who FBI officials believe worked for Saudi Arabia’s intelligence service,” to 9/11. As NBC News reported:The Saudi national, Omar Al-Bayoumi, was the focus of years of investigation by the FBI's San Diego field office because of his association with two of the 9/11 hijackers, Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi, prior to the attack. The video, which was unsealed in federal court last week, was a self-narrated video that shows Al-Bayoumi giving a tour of landmarks in Washington, D.C. The video was shot over several days in 1999 and included videos of entrances, exits and security checkpoints in the U.S. Capitol.The FBI, or elements thereof, have allegedly been trying to nail al-Bayoumi and the Saudi government for the past 23 years, but have been prevented from doing so by Saudi power, money, and influence. If that’s true, then Saudi Arabia basically owns America. It can blow up buildings full of thousands of people, attack the Pentagon, and tell the FBI to get stuffed, and everybody from the president (four of them so far) to the CIA to the military to Congress will cover up the truth. Because Saudis totally own us. They dominate the financial sector. They own Hollywood. They own the media. They own Congress. And only Alex Jones has the courage to say so.The notion that Saudi Arabia has that kind of power, and would use it to blow up the World Trade Center and attack the Pentagon, is obviously absurd. But there is a foreign power that does. And would. And did. (And would want to distract us with a “blame the Saudis” canard.)Below is a transcript of most of my interview with Ehaab Bayoumi, a relative of “Uncle Omar,” recorded in July 2016.Ehaab Bayoumi on Truth Jihad RadioWe're going to have an interesting show today dealing with the alleged 9/11 hijackers. My first-hour guest is Ehaab Bayoumi. Ehaab Bayoumi is a Muslim for 9/11 Truth. Of course, I'm the guy who is currently running that website, Muslims for 9/11 Truth. My past colleagues there include A.K. Dewdney, one of our greatest polymath genius scientists—he's done Ph.D. computer science work, all sorts of interesting ecology stuff, and was the genius columnist after Martin Gardner at Scientific American.Anyway, Ehaab Bayoumi is a Muslim. He's for 9/11 truth. And so by default, I'm going to call him a member of my group. It's actually a pretty big group, because the polls show that of the world's almost two billion Muslims, about 75% know that 9/11 was an inside job. So that would be almost a billion and a half Muslims that belong to my group, Muslims for 9/11 Truth. And if every one of them would just send me a dollar, I'd be able to do a lot more than I'm doing now.We had a great event for Christopher Bollyn last night here in Madison, Wisconsin. We had a good turnout, pretty well filled the room, thanks to an ad in the Isthmus local alternative weekly, which cost us 900 bucks. So once again, if anybody wants to help pay for that kind of stuff— If every one of you Muslims listening, all 1.5 billion of you, would all just go to TruthJihad.com and send me a dollar, I'd be able to buy a much better ad than the one we had for Christopher Bollyn, so we can keep this message going.I think it's really important to just not give up. This is an issue where if we don't give up, we win. The truth has its own power, its own barakah, spiritual energy, its own momentum, and ultimately it prevails. And so we stay with it, and then we prevail. So we just have to keep plugging away. And we're making some progress.We're going to be talking about various kinds of progress in the 9/11 investigation. We're going to hear some new information from Ehaab Bayoumi, who knows some of the families of the alleged 9/11 hijackers, or so I'm told. And he's not really happy with the way these people let themselves get set up as patsies to be falsely blamed for the crime of the century. Most of these people, maybe all of them, were not remotely close to being even particularly religious, much less radical fundamentalists or followers of bin Laden or anything like that.The 15 Saudis, out of alleged 19 hijackers, came over here to the U.S. on CIA snitch visas, meaning they were CIA assets and were in the U.S. on CIA-business visas. I wonder what that could have been.Anyway, they were repeatedly impersonated, apparently in some cases by Israeli Mossad agents. We have two cases where we have evidence of that. One is the case of Mohammed Atta. The original Mohammed Atta was Egyptian. He never learned Hebrew. Why would an Egyptian learn Hebrew unless he was working for Mossad, of course? Anyway, the supposed so-called Mohammed Atta in Florida, who was dating a stripper and visiting all kinds of houses of ill repute, snorting cocaine, drinking whiskey like a fish, gambling, going on junkets to Las Vegas, hanging out with Jack Abramoff, the notorious Jewish gangster, on his casino boats.Th

Rumble link Bitchute linkIn this special supplement to our recent False Flag Weekly News broadcast, Professor Anthony Hall discusses his essay The Influential Role of Jewish Theocracy in the Zionist Governance of the West.Excerpt:It seems to me that maybe Iran has an advantage because the theocratic nature of the country is up front. It's clear to people how decisions are made. There's transparency. But then when I look at my own society, Western society, I think, well, that's become very theocratic as well. There are inheritances from the Old Testament, the Torah, having to do with this concept that there is a chosen people—that going back to Abraham and his son Isaac and Isaac's son Jacob, there is a covenant with a chosen people who represent the seed of Abraham.And this Chosenite ethos seems to have become very powerful in the West. And it is now being expressed even to the point where one Chosenite people, the Jewish people and their state—their state is becoming like a chosen state. It has a different set of rules. It's not bound by the same limitations as the rule of law, equality, and the universal nature of laws and the understanding that everybody be treated equally. It's even reached the extent that one people is claiming the right to kill another people, to eliminate another people, in what's being called a genocide.And the people perpetrating the genocide are the victims, they tell us.That raises the whole issue of the Holocaustianity and another approach to theocracy. The story of World War II creates the context out of which Israel emerges after World War II as a kind of phoenix rising.So it seemed to me that it would be useful to think about the Western governance as saying there is a uniform rule of law, as saying we're all equal before the law, but the reality is it's not at all like that. And Israel itself is becoming a kind of theocracy with the likes of these settlers, the Ben-Gavirs and Smotriches and all they embody. It's becoming a messianic, very religious country where people are obsessed with ideas of a third temple and ruling the world from Jerusalem.And a bunch of Americans support that, including Christians. Do you want to talk about John Hagee and Christian Zionism?I don't know that much about John Hagee, but as far as I know, he's a typical example of these dispensationalist-type Christians, the Christians that got waylaid by the Scofield Bible and went down the path of becoming extremist Christian Zionists who have the bizarre idea that we should force God's hand by encouraging the Jews to commit abominations in the Holy Land, which will then somehow bring Jesus back, and Jesus will save the elect, the few, and damn almost everybody else. And somehow that's good. And then they'll take credit for making Jesus come back and do that. It’s one of the dumbest theologies that I've ever heard of.Well, there is this phenomena called Christian Zionism.And we'll look at the deeper historical roots of it. But these days, Pastor John Hagee is kind of the dominant figure because of his group that has over 11 million members, Christians for Israel. And so he is running a major empire. He's a multi-billionaire by now.This is an extremely lucrative approach to Christianity. The big evangelical churches are all to some extent Christian Zionists. There's the odd Christian critique of Christian Zionism, like Rick Wiles, but the big commercial audiences, the big television audiences, are dominated by this obsession now with something called the rapture and the second coming of Jesus and somehow Israel becoming the center of world governance for a golden millennium. And the Christians think that Jesus will be in control. And then the Jews haven't had their Messiah yet, but they're still waiting for their Messiah. And how is this going to work out?So Mike Pence or other people who want to get into high office have to go through John Hagee. And John Hagee can harness millions of people to electoral campaigns. And you've got to play with big money to be part of this system. It is forming a national church in the United States, Christian Zionism.So we're living in a society which definitely has a powerful theocracy which is not really noticed. So my effort in this essay was to say, let's notice it.It's not only about Christian Zionism. It's about largely the fact that we have this thing called the rule of law, but then we have an understanding that some people are exempt.The Chosenites are exempt. So now it's seen as strange that they're being held to some kind of account by these UN courts, the International Court of Justice on the one hand, and now the ICC, the International Criminal Court, which is being infiltrated.And now Britain has intervened to say, you can't charge Netanyahu and Gallant and probably others. Why? Well, hey, come on. They're the chosen people. They're doing a noble task. It's not genocide. They're simply defending themselves from the sins of the real genociders who came out o

Rumble link Bitchute linkState Department whistleblower J. Michael Springmann and I discussed the Axis of Resistance’s defeat of Israel on the new False Flag Weekly News. Below is my new essay on a related topic, scheduled for translation and publication in Iran... -KBIbraham Raisi and the Politics of MartyrdomBy Kevin BarrettOn May 19, Iran lost one of its all-time greatest leaders—which is saying something, since that proud ancient nation has had plenty of leaders since it was first unified in 625 BC. President Ibrahim Raisi’s death in a helicopter crash shocked the world and evoked massive outpourings of mourning across the country. Millions of people poured into the streets of Tabriz, Qom, Jamkaran, Birjand, and Mashhad, and millions more followed the funeral demonstrations on social media.President Raisi had assumed the presidency at a difficult time for Iran. He took office in June, 2021, almost a year and a half after the great general and likely future president, Qasem Soleimani, was martyred by a US military drone. Raisi’s predecessor, Hassan Rouhani, had devoted his presidency to fruitlessly striving to improve relations with the United States. Rouhani’s thanks was to have the JCPOA nuclear deal, the signature achievement of the Iran’s West-leaning reformist faction, rudely shredded by Donald Trump and the Netanyahu-loyalist faction of the American deep state, which subsequently murdered Gen. Soleimani under Zionist orders.So by June 2021, the Iranian people understood that the USA is, as Putin puts it, “non-agreement-capable.” They elected President Raisi to put an end to the Rouhani era of pointless appeasement, and inaugurate a new era in which Iran would calmly but firmly stand up for its own interests, and for the interests of oppressed people in the region and across the world.President Raisi did not disappoint. On the contrary, he wildly exceeded expectations. Under his leadership, Iran became a full member of the BRICS alliance and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. By deepening ties with Russia, China, and other relatively independent world powers, Raisi’s Iran not only improved its economic prospects, but also strengthened its defenses.While deepening Iranian integration into BRICS, President Raisi had the wisdom to seek improved relations with Iran’s Persian Gulf neighbors, including the often-problematic Saudi Arabia and Bahrain. By working with Russia and China to gradually wean the region from US hegemony, the Iranian president helped create a blueprint for regional peace “without America and Israel.” That project, while it remains a work in progress, is clearly en route to full realization.The Raisi administration managed to improve ties with former adversaries even as it strengthened the so-called Axis of Resistance nations and groups. It accelerated military support and technology transfer to Iran’s allies in the region, including sending rapidly-advancing drone and missile technologies to Yemen’s Ansarallah movement, Iraq’s Katā’ib Hezbollah, and Lebanon’s Hezbollah, while increasing military support for Hamas and Islamic Jihad in occupied Palestine.President Raisi’s two-pronged approach of healing Iran’s breach with the Gulf states while strengthening the Axis of Resistance might sound like a contradiction. After all, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, and to lesser extent the other Gulf satrapies, feared the Axis of Resistance because they saw it as directed against them. That’s why Saudi Arabia launched its disastrous war on Yemen in 2015.But President Raisi, with the strong support of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and the cooperation of Russia and China, successfully conveyed to the leaders of the Gulf countries that the Axis of Resistance was primarily focused on freeing the region from Zionist-American occupation, and that there would still be a place for those countries, and their leaders, in post-Zionist, post-American West Asia.President Raisi’s efforts to bring the region together in the transition to a post-Zionist post-imperialist world were greatly strengthened after the successful Al-Aqsa Storm operation on October 7, 2023. The Zionist regime’s genocidal reaction to Hamas’s courageous defense of Palestine and its holy places has proven, once and for all, that Islamic Iran’s position has always been correct: The Zionists are evil, genocidal lunatics who have no future in West Asia. Iran’s championing of the Palestinian Resistance, which has always had broad support across the region, has won the fervent and near-unanimous (if sometimes clandestine) accolades of the whole Arab and Islamic worlds, as well as the Global South and the younger generation in the Global North. So the wise policies of President Raisi have played a key role in the way the events of the region have unfolded since October 7th 2023, contributing to Israel’s humiliation and to its substantial weakening militarily, economically, diplomatically, and in its public relations and soft power

Rumble linkIslamic scholar Abu Bilal Yakub discusses The One-Eyed Impostor, book one of his Messiah and False Messiah trilogy.He hypothesizes that the Dajjal (Antichrist) is “in a realm (or dimension) suspended somewhere between the material realm (our physical universe) and the seven stratas (the seven heavens), which not only explains why he has not yet physically emerged (at the present moment of writing this book) but how he is able to enact his actions and their manifestations in our world, particularly how he is able to communicate with his servants, in the same way that sorcerers are able to communicate with the Jinn across dimensions.” His views about the relationship of Zionism to Antichrist/Dajjal parallel those of Sheikh Imran Hossein.Sidi Abu Bilal Yakub is a senior teacher at the Online Institute of Islamic Eschatology. The author of several works of fiction as well as non-fiction, his approach to Islamic scholarship in general and eschatology in particular is distinguished by its philosophical bent.From the interview:They're trying to program (AI) in such a way as to make it seem as though it's able to empathize or sympathize, but it's only using information that arrives through the audible and visual that comes to it. It cannot actually sense on a deeper level.You could sit next to, you could talk to somebody and you could sense that they're upset by what you're saying. Or that it's uplifting them somehow. A human being can do that. But the machine cannot do that.Their aim is to take it to that level. And they have the Turing test, in which you would subject a human being and if they can be deceived by (the AI), then artificial intelligence has passed the test. And that's the idea. If you can be deceived by the entity, then it has succeeded.And that's primarily the argument I make in the beginning of my book there, that his premise as the Antichrist (is that) he succeeds if you fail in your purpose. And he fails if you succeed in your purpose. So it's not on him, it's actually on you. It's actually on us as the human beings. If we adhere to our purpose of creation, then he essentially fails. And we're not actually adhering to our purpose of creation, at least not in the majority. And how can we fix that?There are a number of really interesting kinds of predictions about the end times in Islamic scripture that probably a lot of my audience hasn't heard of. Some of these are very resonant with things today.Often people point to “(in the end times) the desert Bedouins will compete with each other building tall buildings” and then they look at Dubai and Qatar and Bahrain and Saudi Arabia. But one that always jumps out at me, and did again after this presidential debate with Biden and Trump, is that “in the end times, the worst of a community will be its leaders—the very worst people will be the leaders.” And that seems to be coming true, nowhere more obviously than in the American presidential race. But I suppose that an artificial intelligence based on the world system we have today would maybe be the worst leader of all.Well, there's no depth of perception, right? If you want to look at someone like John F. Kennedy, if you look at his speeches, or you look at Martin Luther King or Malcolm X, and you look at the way they speak and the kind of articulation and this charisma that they develop when they're speaking, how they move masses of people, it's genuine. It's honest. It's sincere. It's not just cooked up because you've got a whole database of information, terabytes upon petabytes and whatever. It's not hollow. And anyone who's intelligent can see that. It's empty. We know you're lying, but there's nothing we can do about it.And it's not just the case with the American leadership. It's the case with any part of the world. Individuals like Putin are a dying breed, if you will.Yeah, he can speak without a teleprompter.Whoever's coming in next after them, we don't know what kind of individual they might be. But these kind of leaders are now a dying breed. We've now got the kind of Trumps and Bidens and these type of individuals. I mean, Biden himself, to be honest…I don't want to discuss politics, but there are things that as a leader, if he had the capability, I'm pretty sure he could have done certain things for the country. But then again, insofar as world events are concerned, insofar as foreign policies are concerned, you've got characters like Obama and Biden served under him. There are a lot of damages that these individuals have done to the rest of the world.So gone are the times when we had leaders like JFK in the United States, We're now in times where you have the worst of people coming in to lead, and these are superpowers. And one of the aspects of this “worst people are the leaders” prediction that seems to have come true in an uncanny and very disturbing way is that so many of the leadership classes in the United States are compromised, whether by having been approached by represe

En route to Congress, Jamaal Bowman was forced to issue a ritual denunciation of one of his heroes, six-term Georgia Congresswoman and 2008 Green Party presidential candidate Cynthia McKinney. We know Bowman admired McKinney because he put her, alongside Malcolm X, Martin Luther King, and others, on his Cornerstone Academy “wall of honor.” But Bowman’s ritual denunciations of McKinney didn’t save him. AIPAC, the Jewish billionaire lobby that runs America as its private fiefdom, couldn’t allow anyone to remain in Congress who doesn’t enthusiastically support the genocide of Gaza.Cynthia McKinney, during her six terms in Congress, got a close-up-and-personal view of the Jewish billionaires’ stranglehold over American government. If she had let them buy her the way they’ve bought almost everyone else (except Thomas Massie?) she might well have become a vice president, or even president. One of the Jewish billionaire dictatorship’s genocidal mind-control commissars informs us:Bowman has likewise left no doubt that he disagrees with McKinney’s most vile, antisemitic statements. When McKinney tweeted a meme about Zionists perpetrating 9/11 in June 2021, Bowman replied that her message was “antisemitic,” “hateful,” “misguided and ignorant,” and asked Twitter to remove her post…McKinney, an outspoken Israel critic, lost the Democratic primary to a challenger backed by pro-Israel donors in 2002. When asked who he blamed for McKinney’s difficult race, McKinney’s father, then-state Rep. Billy McKinney, told a TV interviewer: “Jews have bought everybody. Jews, J-E-W-S.”Cynthia McKinney, like her father, has the guts to spell it out. If Americans ever take back their country, she’ll feature prominently and heroically in the history books.Excerpt from the interview:I’m Kevin Barrett doing audio with an old friend and regular guest going way, way back: Cynthia McKinney, the best person I ever voted for for president. Cynthia, you're far ahead of your time now with people like Thomas Massie (confirming McKinney’s description of AIPAC handlers controlling Congressional reps) and the whole Jamal Bowman affair. People are saying “Cynthia figured out that these Jewish Zionists own Congress long before most people had ever heard of it.”That's exactly right. And the situation with Jamal Bowman is bittersweet for me. Because right after he got elected, clearly he was carrying out some diktat from AIPAC because he put out a tweet criticizing, condemning me. And he never knew me. He knew about me. I've since read that he had me on his black history board for his high school or middle school, where he was the principal. So I went from being someone laudable enough to make a New York state board for Black History Month, to becoming the goat to be ridiculed on his Twitter after he was elected to the Congress.And I just knew it had the APAC fingerprints all over it. Putting myself in Bowman's position: “Let me go ahead and get this out of the way. Let me show them how loyal I am to them. Let me do this public criticism of Cynthia McKinney.”So he did that. He had to denounce Cynthia McKinney. And then (three years later) he exits Congress after having been McKinneyed.What good does it do to kowtow to these Zionists? It doesn't help. They just keep coming.That's the whole point. It’s what I said—it must be 25 or 30 years ago now. I said 100% is not enough. You can give AIPAC (everything). And all of the tentacles that extend from AIPAC. They talk about the AIPAC donations. But if you're speaking about the pro-Israel lobby, it's way bigger than just AIPAC. Those tentacles extend all over the Washington, D.C., political landscape. For example, you might be an environmentalist and you're looking to get some money from environmental organizations. Well, who creates the hurdles that you have to jump over? It's the pro-Israel climate people or green people or environmental people.It might be that you're looking for health or budget priorities. And then, who establishes those hurdles that you have to jump over in order to get the PAC money? It's the same people, it's the cousins of the same people, that you have to jump over for the climate. And so once you get up there, what you realize is that it's all very connected. It's like…What is that called that the mushrooms make?The mycelium.Exactly. So Washington, D.C. is run by the pro-Israel mycelium that extends all over Washington, D.C.That sounds about right, although it's kind of an insult to mycelium and the noble mushroom to call it that. I mean, I like mushrooms. I'm not even getting into the kinds of mushrooms I used to grow when I was young and stupid. But seriously, yeah, they're everywhere, aren't they?They are everywhere. And so I have had many conversations about this, and one of the most illuminating conversations was with Walter Fontroy. And Walter Fontroy from the Committee on Political Assassinations from the U.S. Congress was the delegate from Washington, D.C. Fontroy coined thei

False Flag Weekly News link Rumble link Bitchute link Essay first published in American Free PressBenjamin Netanyahu is a wanted man. The Israeli Prime Minister is wanted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court. He is considered a leading suspect in the 9/11 false flag attacks. And he is also very much wanted, meaning desired, as a guest speaker at the US Congress in Washington, DC.Normally, Congress isn’t in the habit of inviting serial killers to deliver solemn declamations. Ed Gein, Ted Bundy, Jeff Dahmer, John Wayne Gacy, and Charles Manson were never issued bipartisan invitations to address America’s legislators, any more than Jack the Ripper was rolled out the red carpet to proffer perorations to Parliament.But Netanyahu is a special case. His scheduled July 24 speech marks the fourth occasion that America’s top congressional leaders have honored the world’s leading child murderer and genocide perpetrator with a speaking opportunity. If he evades Interpol and arrives safely in DC, Netanyahu will overtake former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill as the foreign leader who has delivered the most speeches to Congress. (Churchill was “only” invited three times.)Bizarrely, Netanyahu’s speeches to Congress are always stinging rebukes of sitting US presidents. In July 1996, newly-elected anti-peace-process candidate Netanyahu threw ice water on then-president Clinton’s efforts to fulfill the promise of the Camp David accords, which required Israel to withdraw from East Jerusalem. Netanyahu basically gave Clinton the finger:“There have been efforts to re-divide this city (Jerusalem) by those who claim that peace can come through division—that it can be secured through multiple sovereignties, multiple laws, and multiple police forces.This is a groundless and dangerous assumption which impels me to declare today: There will never be such a re-division of Jerusalem!”After returning home, Netanyahu repeatedly attacked the Al-Aqsa mosque, slaughtered dozens of Palestinians, and ultimately used Israeli asset Monica Lewinsky to hamstring Clinton and torpedo his peace plan. (The Likud leader likely oversaw a much bigger dirty trick on September 11, 2001, but the details of that complex and contested event are beyond the scope of this essay.)Twice during Obama’s presidency, in 2011 and 2015, Netanyahu again used speeches to Congress to slap down a US president’s peace plans. On May 24, 2011, the Israeli PM reiterated that Israel would never, ever return to its pre-1967 borders—as the entire world including the US insists it must—and warned Obama against negotiating with Iran. Then on March 3, 2015, Bibi returned to the US Congress to viciously attack Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran. On that occasion, Congress’s sycophancy appalled the entire world. The BBC reported that Netanyahu “got 28 standing ovations in 47 minutes—there was hardly time for the audience to sit down between them.”Why is a corrupt, genocide-perpetrating foreign leader suspected of orchestrating 9/11 so popular at the US Congress? The answer, of course, is that Congress is owned by Israel.How did a foreign nation take over the US Congress? The short answer: They have used every trick in the book, including:*Bribery: Israel’s partisans give between one third and one half of congressional “campaign donations”—and that’s just the on-the-books money.*Blackmail: For decades, Israeli asset Meyer Lansky blackmailed J. Edgar Hoover and the rest of America’s leadership, and Jeffrey Epstein and dozens or hundreds of others have continued those activities.*Assassination: Israel leads the world in political assassinations, and is suspected of involvement in the deaths of such Americans as President John F. Kennedy and Senator Robert F. Kennedy, among others.*Media Dominance: See Philip Weiss’s essay “Do Jews Dominate in American Media? And So What If We Do?”As technology evolves, the Israelis keep learning new tricks. The world found out about one of them recently when Politico reported that “at least 128 members of Congress were targeted by an Israeli-linked operation to spread pro-Israel military content amid the ongoing war in the Gaza Strip.” The operation, backed by the Israeli government, included the creation of 600 fake social media profiles spamming targeted lawmakers with “more than 2000 coordinated comments per week backing Israel’s military actions, slamming Palestinian rights groups, and dismissing claims of human rights abuses.”When Russia was accused of doing similar things in 2016, without much evidence, the media blew it up into the Russiagate scandal that hobbled Trump’s presidency. But there are no indications that Russia ever gained significant influence over the US government.Israel, by contrast, has now been caught dead-to-rights targeting Congress through social media fraud. And the evidence that Israel exerts significant control over the US government is undeniable. Just look at how Congress keeps kissing the feet of indic

Rumble link Bitchute linkFadi Lama returns to this show with a slideshow based on his article “Israel: The Jewish Settler Colony in the Levant: A Prognosis.” Since our last interview, Israel has edged closer to the full-scale attack on Lebanonthat could be the Zionist Entity’s undoing. As Fadi told me:“If Israel attacks (Lebanon) it’s real war. I mean real war. Now there are, if you want to call them, serious skirmishes, but it’s not a real war like they’re doing on Gaza. If they do (start) a real war, then it may be considered that from a religious standpoint that Hezbollah can enter into a full war.”Fadi Lama is the author of Why the West Can’t Win: From Bretton Woods to a Multipolar World.Excerpt:Let's look at the quick achievements (of the Axis of Resistance). Liberation of Lebanon from Israeli occupation, defeating US occupation forces in Iraq, defeating the colonial war on Iraq and Syria versus these head choppers and the Kurdish proxies, defeating the colonial war on Yemen via Saudi and UAE proxies, developing a formidable resistance, Hezbollah, and developing a formidable Palestinian resistance.Can you imagine? A strong army, with all these F-16s, all this bombing, and they cannot subdue a popular resistance in Gaza’s 141 square miles.The current status: We have persistence of the genocide, the racist supremacist ideology. And this, of course, is essentially rallying people in the Muslim Ummah against this genocide. The Ummah is being revived. Okay, a very weak revival, but it's being revived.A more powerful revival is in the Levant, because they are acting as one. The resistance in Lebanon, the resistance in Iraq, Syria as a logistics base, and the resistance in Palestine, and expanding to Southwest Asia with Iran and Yemen’s Ansarullah.And this flips the demography. (There are 7 million Jews vs. 7 million Palestinians in historic Palestine, which is just one province of the Levant, itself a province of the Muslim Ummah. The Levant includes not only 7 million Palestinians but also 22.13 Syrians, 5.5 Lebanese, 11.3 million Jordanians, and most of the 85 million Turks and 111 million Egyptians, as well as some residents of Iraq and Saudi Arabia. The even larger Ummah includes about two billion people. So 7 million “Israeli” Jews are fighting the 200 million Muslims and Christians of the Levant, and behind it the two billion strong Muslim Ummah -KB)And keep in mind, you need to have a criminal ideology to commit genocide and colonialism. But this supremacist ideology also can blind you. And now it's like a double-edged sword. It's leading to fatal strategic decisions. The military differential has flipped. Israel is following the American model. They are still fighting World War II. And as you can see, they failed in Gaza. They failed in opening sea lanes (in Yemen).A lot of people focus on Israel’s nuclear capability. But Alistair Crook is the best Western reference on the situation in the region, and for several years, he has been saying repeatedly, forget the nuclear bomb. The Axis of Resistance has made a ring of missiles which can destroy by convention means the state of Israel. And he specifically says that while all eyes were focused on the big one, the nuclear bomb, this ring of missiles was slowly, slowly being developed, which he calls the red pill option.So military supremacy in Southwest Asia is with the Resistance Axis.There seems to be escalation on the front between the occupied Palestine and Lebanon right now, and we have a new extremist war cabinet in power in Israel that wants to fight Lebanon again to try to avenge 2006. You're saying that the Axis of Resistance has military superiority. Do you believe that this war will expand, and where will it go?You can approach it from any angle, and the truth is always the same. What has changed in the military material and the operational doctrine of the Israeli army between the 2006 war and the war on Gaza? Nothing! F-16s, bombing to smithereens, killing civilians, okay? Nothing has changed. They go back to the same (failed) war doctrine.If you look at Hezbollah between 2006 and today, nothing has remained the same. Everything has changed. Material has changed, operational doctrine has changed, war experience has changed. The war that they waged against the NATO head-choppers in Iraq and Syria covered hundreds of thousands square kilometers of land.These were big wars, these were major wars. And also in the eastern mountains of Lebanon. This was a very big war. They had the training there.Hezbollah today is incomparable with Israel today. So, Israel was defeated in 2006. What about now? Everybody with a little brain can see it. Why can’t they (the Zionists)? They can't see it—or some of them can't see it. A lot of people in their own military are telling them this is a suicide mission. But the crazies, specifically Smorich and Ben-Gvir…This is where I said this (genocidal) ideology is a double-edged sword. It blinds you from reality, so you

Rumble link Bitchute linkAuthor AJ Smuskiewicz discusses his new book Searching for Truth in the Empire of Lies. It recount's AJ's career journey from graphics designer to biologist to writer-editor to damnable heretical dissident, and includes essays published at Intellectual Conservative, The Unz Review, and VT Foreign Policy, as well as at his personal website.It seems AJ used to be within hailing distance of consensus reality. He once made a living editing work that fell squarely within the Overton Window of acceptable discourse. But somewhere along the way, something happened. What was it? Was he kidnapped by space aliens in Peotone, Illinois, as he asserts in the book, and given a "dissident implant"? Or was it the COVID-era mass formation psychosis that alienated him? Or maybe he just imbibed one official lie too many, and suddenly felt the need to vomit them all out? Tune in to the interview and find out what happened to AJ. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkWill nuclear World War III happen this summer? The answer, we all hope, pray, and expect, is “no.” But the odds of what would be an unprecedented global disaster are at an all-time high. The Union of Concerned Scientists’ Doomsday Clock, stuck at a record-breaking 90 seconds to midnight since last year, should have moved a few ticks closer to Armageddon in late May, after Ukraine and its US backers began striking Russian early-warning radar sites tasked with detecting a US nuclear attack.Russia announced that it would respond symmetrically by arming US adversaries with long-range weapons. Since then a Russian nuclear-capable fleet has visited Cuba, raising the prospect of another Cuban missile crisis, and Putin has embraced North Korea in such a way as to confirm rumors that Russia has indeed given North Korea Topol M missiles, as claimed by Theodore Postol. More such gifts to various US adversaries are undoubtedly in the pipeline.The proximate trigger for World War III’s death-spiral of uncontrollable escalation could conceivably happen in Korea, on the Russia-Ukraine front, or in the South China Sea. But it seems likelier that Armageddon will erupt from somewhere in the general vicinity of its namesake, Megiddo Hill, in northern Occupied Palestine. That prognosis is based on rational calculation, not scriptural prophecy. There is an obvious reason why the Holy Land is the leading candidate for triggering global nuclear war: It is occupied by a doomed, fanatical messianic-millenarian death cult armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons. Since global nuclear war will make the world so much worse for everyone (except vultures, jackals, rats, and other eaters of carrion) it will inevitably be the product of extreme rashness and recklessness. In Occupied Palestine, the level of maniacal heedlessness in high places is off the charts. Even the crazed neocons running the US seem like rational actors compared to Israel’s leaders.As my recent podcast guest Oliver Boyd-Barrett wrote this morning:Netanyahu, following the resignation of Bennie Gantz from the war cabinet a few days ago, has dissolved the cabinet, returning direct control of the war to the full security cabinet. This development, in an already febrile combustible climate, enhances the likelihood that its more fanatical wing will push for an Israeli invasion of Southern Lebanon, plans for which have already been confirmed.There is a reason why the US put the kibosh on Netanyahu’s plans for a major war on Lebanon shortly after the October 7 Al-Aqsa Storm concentration camp breakout. And that reason is all-too-obvious: Israel has no hope of winning such a war without dragging in the US, which would in turn drag in Iran and Russia, ultimately backed by China. Nobody could afford to let their side lose such a war, so it would likely escalate uncontrollably.But if the American leadership is sometimes minimally rational, the same can’t be said of its Israeli counterpart. Following the resignations of Benny Gantz and Gadi Eisenkot on June 13, the Zionist entity has been in the hands of certifiable lunatics like Smotrich and Ben Gvir. They have made no secret of their determination to avenge Hezbollah’s 2006 humiliation of Israel, at whatever cost. Netanyahu is on board, since the alternative is stepping down and going to prison. Now that the Israeli military has approved operational plans for an invasion of Lebanon, the likely trigger for World War III has been locked and loaded.But if Israel invades Lebanon against US orders, might the American leadership finally decide to act in its own interests, rather than allowing itself to once again be hijacked by Israeli extremists? Press TV Interviews Kevin Barrett on Israel-Lebanon EscalationPolitical analyst Kevin Barrett joins us now from Saidia, Morocco, to offer us more insight on that story. Mr. Barrett, welcome to the program. First of all, I want to get your perspective on the escalation of violence and escalation of tensions between the Lebanese resistance movement Hezbollah and the occupying Israeli regime on the southern Lebanese border.Well, ever since Israel launched its genocidal attack on the people of Gaza last October, Hezbollah has been supporting the Palestinian cause and pushing back against this genocide by keeping a level of activity going on the southern Lebanese border of the occupied Palestinian territories, forcing the Zionists to keep their military forces on high alert, keeping a number of those forces tied down in the north. They actually ended up having to evacuate some of those occupied territories. Some of the settlers, a large number, I believe half a million people actually, have left those occupied territories. And currently, the Zionist regime seems to be in a crisis. They've had a cabinet member, Benny Gantz, resign. There is a question about whether they'll be able to cobble together this new government totally dominated by the ultra-extremists. And those ul

Rumble link Bitchute linkPress TVWelcome everyone to Press TV's news review program where we get in-depth in one of the day's top stories. And now today in review, the UN Agency for Palestinian Refugees, UNRWA, says over 50,000 children across the Gaza Strip are suffering from acute malnutrition. UNRWA described the humanitarian situation as catastrophic, adding Gazans are now facing desperate levels of hunger due to the Israeli blockade.The UN Children's Agency UNICEF also said the children of Gaza are living in constant terror due to Israeli bombardment. UNICEF said the Israeli forced displacement of Gazans in Rafah has caused the agency to lose track of over 3,000 children. It added the humanitarian conditions and the suffering of citizens in Gaza are worsening by the day due to the continuous blockade by Israeli forces.And joining us for our program now, pardon, is Dr. Kevin Barrett, Editor at Veterans Today, joining us from Saidia, Morocco and Gilbert Doctorow, Independent International Affairs Analyst, joining us out of Brussels. Gentlemen, I'd like to welcome you both to the program.Dr. Barrett, we'll start with you. Hope you're doing well out there in Morocco. Your thoughts about the regime continuing to block all humanitarian aid from getting into Gaza and that's impacting the development of vulnerable small children.Kevin Barrett: Well, the genocidal Zionist regime is deliberately starving children of Palestine, and they're admitting this. They're not even trying to hide it. Numerous Israeli leaders have made clearly genocidal statements, such as statements about how the children who survived when we mowed the lawn are the same people who then grow up to support Hamas and so on, so we really should have just killed all the children back then. And by implication, we should kill them now. The top rabbi in Israel has basically said this, as have a number of the other Israeli leaders.So they're not even hiding the fact that they're deliberately slaughtering, torturing, and maiming children as national policy. And the fact that this is allowed to happen in today's world is astonishing.Right now we're celebrating Eid al-Adha in the Islamic world, which is a celebration of the end of human sacrifice, and specifically the end of sacrificing children. That was a common practice in the ancient Mediterranean, among the Phoenician and Carthaginian culture, particularly, but others as well. And when God told people to stop sacrificing their children, that was a momentous step forward for civilization.But apparently we're going back to the era of the sacrifice of children as this bizarre, psychotic, millenarian-messianic, genocidal cult of satanic so-called Jews—really Zionists—in occupied Palestine, is sacrificing children by the tens of thousands. And the low estimate of the number of children murdered so far is somewhere in the neighborhood of 15,000 children. The reality is much higher, of course, as so many children have been lost track of and are buried beneath the rubble where they died very slowly and painfully in horrible anguish due to the Zionists deliberately dropping their buildings on top of them.So it's completely disgusting and unacceptable that the world is allowing this to continue.Thank you, Dr. Barrett. Gilbert Doctorow, welcome to the conversation, sir, and welcome to the program. The Israeli regime has the bigger guns, the tanks, the bigger bombs, the helicopters and fighter jets, far superior firepower. Why do you need to pick as your main victim the women and hungry children of Gaza?Gilbert Doctorow: Well, I add my voice of outrage to what Israel is doing in Gaza. This genocide is unacceptable, but who is acting against it? And I'd like to use this opportunity, since you have given me the microphone, to suggest a way out of this. The way out is to follow a page from the American playbook. It's called form a coalition of the willing.It is clear for understandable reasons that Iran, Saudi Arabia, and other neighbors of Israel are reluctant to enter into military confrontation with Israel because they know very well that this will be very damaging to their own populations and many people will die in a valiant effort that may or may not succeed. It is a different situation if it's not one country or two countries that go up against this blockade of Israel, but a coalition of nations. And I would propose, insofar as I am well aware that Russian officials follow Press TV, I make a proposal to them: that they lead this coalition.The capability of the Russians who have a naval base in Syria, and who are present in the region, is large. The Israelis will not go to war with Russia, if Russia heads a coalition to break the blockade. I didn't say to break the Israeli army, no. To break the blockade for humanitarian grounds. That will be morally acceptable if it is not one nation…Thank you, Mr. Doctorow. We're kind of having a loose connection toward the end of your words there, but hopefully that'll

Rumble link Bitchute linkOn Eid al-Adha, the Feast of the Sacrifice—the Muslim world’s biggest holiday, with more than 1.5 million pilgrims congregating in Mecca—the Saudi authorities decided to make it an even bigger holiday…and sacrificed the petrodollar. Worldwide feasting and celebration erupted. Ding-dong, the witch is dead! The US empire is no more! Uncle Schlemiel has finally bit the dust! The implosion of Israel’s American sponsor ended the genocide in Occupied Palestine. Eid al-Adha, which commemorates the end of human sacrifice in general and the ritual slaughter of children in particular, was an auspicious moment to terminate the Zionists’ sacrifice of 15,000+ children in Gaza. Saudi leader Mohammed Bin Salman, previously best known for carving up political enemies with bone saws, has rehabilitated his image and will henceforth be remembered alongside Salahuddin Ayyubi as a liberator, not a tyrant.The Saudis’ sacrifice of the petrodollar also ended the war in Ukraine. The collapsing dollar, no longer supported by oil, lost its power to pay for US occupation of Europe and the empire’s war on Russia. Putin’s peace agreement, freezing the conflict at its current boundaries, was quickly implemented. US plans to turn Taiwan into Ukraine 2.0, leading to World War III against China, were abruptly cancelled. It’s a nice story. Billions wish it were true. But initial reports of the petrodollar’s demise, like those of Mark Twain’s in 1897, appear to have been greatly exaggerated. I got the (fake) news from Australian conspiracy researcher Peter Myers, who forwarded several stories including “Saudi Arabia has dumped the PetroDollar; the deal expired on June 9, 2024.” The claim seems to have originated in India Today, the most widely circulated magazine in India, and the Deccan Herald, another venerable Indian publication.When two of the biggest publications in the world’s most populous nation report that a historic event has occurred, we might be excused for taking them seriously. But the Indian reports of the alleged expiration of the US-Saudi petrodollar agreement raised more questions than answers. The Deccan Herald reported the expiration of an alleged 50-year-old agreement:The US-Saudi Petrodollar deal established on June 8, 1974 was an agreement through which Saudi Arabia agreed to trade crude oil in US dollars in exchange for military equipment and assistance from the US. India Today, for its part, said the agreement that had just expired was 80 years old:The US-Saudi Arabia petrodollar deal, a pivotal arrangement in global finance, has ended after 80 years. This landmark deal, initiated on June 8, 1974, facilitated the exchange of US dollars for crude oil exports, bolstering the dollar's dominance.The Deccan Herald writer was apparently better at math, since June 1974 was 50 years ago, not 80 years ago. So where did India Today get its 80-year time frame? Presumably because the US-Saudi “special relationship” began roughly 80 years ago—79 and a few months, actually—when US President Franklin D. Roosevelt met Saudi King Abdul Aziz Ibn Saud aboard the USS Quincy and “forged the basis of a long relationship: America’s security guarantees for the kingdom in return for access to affordable energy supplies.”*To further confuse matters, another reasonably prestigious publication, Islamicity.org, echoed claims that Saudi Arabia had formally repudiated the alleged petrodollar pact which, “in place for 75 years, marked the US dollar as the world's reserve currency, granting economic stability and access to rising asset prices.” So was there ever a formal US-Saudi agreement mandating that the Saudis sell oil in US dollars? And if so, is it 80 years old, 75 years old, or 50 years old? If such an agreement existed, did the Saudis just refuse to renew it? And if there is no such agreement, and the above-cited reports are fake news, who made up the fake news, and why?Wyatt “W-Mike” Peterson and I discussed the mystery on this week’s False Flag Weekly News. We cited debunkings of the aforementioned Indian media reports, noted the conspicuous lack of evidence for any public and explicit “petrodollar pact” between Washington and Riyahd, and entertained various possibilities including:*There really is a secret petrodollar pact that just expired and the Indian media got wind of it.*There is no such explicit pact, and the fake news reports were (a) clickbait, (b) a psyop, (c) a scam, or (d) an innocent mistake.If they were a geopolitical psyop, who benefits? Will fake news reports like these contribute to eroding the world’s confidence in the dollar? Or, on the contrary, will their pre-planned debunking “inoculate” global public opinion and thereby help maintain dollar hegemony?Or were they a scam, presumably orchestrated to cause a brief blip in gold and bitcoin? Was there any such blip? Is there any record of investors quickly buying and selling around any such blip? If so, is this another 9/11 put options case, meani

Rumble link Bitchute linkJohn Milor, one of the biggest names in Christian UFOlogy, discusses The Paranormal Christian and other works on related topics. “Public disclosure of ET life is in the works; the government is moving in this direction, with the Navy taking the lead.”John notes that Christianity and Islam offer almost identical end-times scenarios: Jesus, the one true Messiah, despised and rejected by the Jews, will return and set things right. Yet somehow John sees Islam as the bad guy, while ignoring the satanic-millenarian-messianic Jews who are currently massacring the descendants of the family of their #1 hate object, Jesus, in hopes of spilling enough blood to incite the coming of their bloodthirsty Messiah who will rule the world, and enslave all non-Jews, from a rebuilt blood sacrifice temple in genocided Jerusalem. THAT is the Antichrist, obviously. And Muslims are the only people seriously resisting it—in service to Jesus, peace upon him, and in defense of his family—as they pray for his return. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Ramin Mazaheri wonders whether the EU-cide is suicide or homicide, asks why its demise is so underreported, ponders Emmanuel Todd’s book The Defeat of the West, investigates the collapse of liberalism, and celebrates the good things happening in Mexico.Ramin Mazaheri is longtime Paris chief correspondent for PressTV and the author of three books on socialism. His latest book is France’s Yellow Vests: Western Repression of the West’s Best Values.Excerpt:I think we can just start by saying that there is so much going on in the world. We are sort of at a historical turning point, something that we haven't been at since maybe the implosion from above of the USSR. There are just so many things going on and it's just such an exciting time to be alive, because so many positive things are happening in so many ways.And there are things that we are hopeful that will be happening but aren't really happening. Like, for example, this petrodollar fall. The petrodollar, as you said, is the underpinning of United States dominance. It is the underpinning of the Western financial system. I have seen that stuff online, too. And I said, oh, my God, this is the greatest news…And then I looked more into it, and it doesn't seem like it is (real). It seems like fake news. But the fact that it's possible, that it's close to happening, and that it probably will happen, i.e. the Saudis will start selling their oil in something other than dollars and start doing it in yuan and maybe even euros—we all see this (eventually) happening.Nobody thought Bitcoin was going to be something in 2017. Nobody thought that Syria would be able to survive. And then it turns out that starting in 2017 Russian military technology is actually superior to Western and NATO technology. And they started proving that in in Syria.Nobody would have thought—well I think people thought in 2017 that the EU was a failed project but you know we just fast forward to seven years later and it's just unbelievable how much the world has changed in so many ways. There are just so many things that we could be talking about.We could be talking about Mexico and their leftist sweep. Leftists have not just won the presidency. They have a super majority in both houses of Congress. They have a super majority of state legislatures. They have a super majority of state governorships. So we're talking about not a leftist victory. This is this is a leftist sweep. And we can expand it further. We can remind ourselves that five of the six largest Latin American economies are run by leftists. And the sixth is run by the libertarian left, Milei, down in Argentina.So there is tremendous change in Latin America, and tremendous change in the middle East, starting with the successful defense of Syria. Then you have the US leaving Afghanistan. And then you have a little conflict going on in a small part of the world that's somewhat important called Palestine, and the spectacular victory of the counteroffensive on October 7th. Who would have thought that that could happen?And then to kind of wrap this up, this sort of preamble, it really is such an amazing, exciting time where there's so many wonderful things going on. And it is basically predicated on the collapse of the European Union. Emmanuel Todd wrote—and I wrote that I didn't agree with it–that Europe's crisis is the world's crisis. I said that's not really true. Europe's crisis is the obstacle, the annoyance of the world… This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link On June 3, former UN Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter was prevented from traveling to the St. Petersburg Economic Forum. Three armed Customs and Border Patrol officers snatched his passport at the airport, telling Ritter that they were following State Department orders. No reason was given for the seizure. Whatever the legal pretext for confiscating Ritter’s passport, it’s clear that the real issue is that Ritter’s political views are not aligned with those of the regime in Washington. If Ritter had been traveling abroad to a conference to echo the US government’s talking points, he would have had an uneventful trip and would still have his passport. Ritter’s passport seizure exemplifies the DC regime’s ever-accelerating crackdown on dissent. On the previous day, June 2, one of the regime’s leading propaganda mouthpieces, the failing Washington Post, had published a vicious smear all but calling for the prosecution of Grayzone journalists. According to the Post, some of those journalists had worked with, or been interviewed by, sanctioned foreign media outlets. It seems that the regime occupying Washington, DC is increasingly reluctant to allow Americans to travel to conferences abroad, to interact with foreign media, and even to question official narratives while based in the US—as Alex Jones learned the hard way. At the same time that Ritter and The Grayzone were being persecuted for communicating with foreigners, Alex Jones was stripped of his ownership of Infowars. Like Ritter and The Grayzone, Jones and Infowars have had the temerity to question official narratives. And while that is not yet officially a crime, it might as well be, since the authorities have shown ever-increasing willingness to bend both civil and criminal law to target nonviolent dissidents.Passport Seizures Are UnconstitutionalBlinken’s State Department violated the Constitution when it seized Ritter’s passport for political reasons. The McCarthy-era practice of denying passports to dissidents was outlawed by a 5-4 Supreme Court decision in June 1958, among whose beneficiaries was the famous singer and communist sympathizer Paul Robeson. “In a 5-4 ruling…the Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional the State Department’s denial of a passport because of a citizen’s political beliefs.”Mainstream media have shown no interest in reporting on Blinken’s blatantly unconstitutional violation of Ritter’s right to travel. Since June 3 I have used Google to fruitlessly search for MSM stories on the incident. Today, eight days after the passport seizure, here is what a Google search for “Scott Ritter passport” returns:At the end of the list we find anti-Ritter pieces in the Albany Times Union, Ritter’s local paper, and Yahoo News Singapore. That, along with a Quora question, is pretty much the extent of the mainstream coverage.Google’s #1 suggestion for those interested in the issue is the Kyiv Post’s hilariously over-the-top propaganda rant “Why Scott Ritter’s Passport Seizure Is Long Overdue.” That masterpiece of unintentional comedy, seemingly outsourced (by Langley or Tel Aviv?) to a regime hack in Dubai who writes like a hysteric overdosing on captagon, sounds like something Stalin might have commissioned to smear someone lined up to be shot after a show trial:Given his penchant for cozying up to enemies of the free world and shamelessly monetizing his deep-seated abhorrence of everything the United States stands for, it is high time draconian action were taken by the current administration to bring Scott Ritter back down to earth. Although he gallivants around the globe under the guise of “waging peace”, nothing would please the erstwhile intelligence operative more than laying the blame of a Russian victory at the feet of President Joe Biden, who he has had an axe to grind with ever since his famous 1998 dressing down in Congress by the then senator over focusing on issues “above his pay grade.”“Draconian action” to bring Ritter “down to (meaning ‘under’?) earth” because he opposes Biden…that sounds a lot like a death threat, doesn’t it? The fulminating editorialist, writing under the name Sahil Menon, apparently would have preferred that the regime shoot down Ritter’s plane, not just his passport.Is Sahil Menon a nom de plume of the notorious American tranny Ukro-Nazi Sarah Ashton-Cirillo, who has long been in the habit of calling for assassinations of American dissidents? Does he/she/it want to see Ritter share the fate of Gonzalo Lira, the American alternative journalist who was kidnapped, tortured, extorted, and murdered by the Washington regime’s Ukrainian proxies for the crime of telling the truth on YouTube?Since “Menon,” an obscure hack and hideously awful writer, had “his” unhinged hit piece promoted to #1 by Google, we may assume that it represents the regime’s official view. How else would “he” know that:What landed Ritter in hot water, however, was disingenuously passing off his recent visits to Russi

Rumble link Bitchute linkGlenn Diesen discusses his book The Ukraine War and the Eurasian World Order. He sketches the historical background from a geopolitical realist perspective, and argues that “to understand the war it is necessary to acknowledge that it has three participants: NATO, Russia, and Ukraine, with their respective objectives. NATO under U.S. leadership explicitly seeks to defeat Russia to end its great power status…Russia considers the war to be an existential threat and has acted accordingly…Ukraine obviously also considers the war to be an existential threat, although different factions within Ukraine may turn on each other…Irrespective of the outcome of the war, the unipolar world order has come to an end…A Eurasian world order is now finally emerging as the international distribution of power continues to shift from the West to the East, and the legitimacy of the Western-centric world order has been severely weakened.”Dr. Glenn Diesen is a Scholarly Teaching Fellow at the Department of Security Studies and Criminology at Macquarie University. He studied international relations, Russian foreign policy, and security institutions in the European post-Cold War security architecture.Excerpt:During the first hour of the show, Alan Sabrosky agreed that we're transitioning toward a multipolar order. He felt that the US empire’s nuclear brinksmanship, having Ukrainian proxies attacking Russian early warning systems, exemplifies its reckless willingness to push things right up to the nuclear brink and beyond. And for that reason, he thought that the emergence of this multipolar world was questionable, or the way it's going to happen is questionable. He seemed to disagree with my analysis, which I put out as soon as Russia, quote unquote “invaded” Ukraine, that the Russians have more skin in the game, so the nuclear deterrent becomes more credible on the Russian side than on the US side. It's not totally existential for the US as a nation in the way that it is existential for Russia as a nation. But Alan thinks that the US empire is run by people who are so crazy—the neoconservatives—that they are going to push the nuclear brinksmanship just as hard as the Russians are. And that strikes me as a very pessimistic forecast. What do you think?Well, I agree that the Russians, as you said, have more skin in the game. And the fact that it's at this proximity, that it's on the border of Russia, gives the Russians two advantages. One would be the actual war fighting, because in large-scale wars such as this, logistics is the key. And as it's happening on the Russian borders, they will simply have more benefits, as opposed to the United States, who have to supply everything from the other side of the planet.But the second, obviously, is that they have more to lose. This is an existential threat for Russia. They see this as essentially a fight for survival, so they will go all the way. Which also raises the question, where are we going with these escalations? Because NATO is gradually escalating. Remember, first we weren't going to have tanks, then we did artillery, now missiles. The missiles can strike inside Russia. Now (NATO is) attacking Russia’s early warning system.So, we have this gradual escalation. First of all, this can trigger a response from the Russians, which they're already arguing is coming. But even if we're able to defeat the Russians, this would likely result in the Russians having to resort to nuclear weapons. One can try to put oneself in the position of the adversary. Imagine if it was the other way around—if it was the Russians who had helped install an anti-American government in Mexico and the Russians began to put their weapon systems in there. Obviously giving the Mexicans weapons to strike inside American territory, bombing American cities—Russia wouldn't want to win this war, because the United States would have to resort to nuclear weapons at the end.But I don't think we have any strategic and diplomatic way out. Because it seems not just the United States, but the collective West, doesn’t have any strategic imagination for anything else than hegemony. And we see this also as being a conflict about world order, which is why we're willing to risk everything, effectively. Because if we can defeat the Russians, the idea is that we can go back to the one central power. And if we lose it, then the West will be very discredited—and especially the Europeans, by the way. I think the Americans will be fine. In Europe, we're in much greater trouble. But there's so much at stake. And this is why we're willing to take such great risks. But it’s also very uncharted territory we're getting into. And overall, because it's a struggle for world order, as I argue, it's essentially almost like a winner take all. This is the most dangerous strategy, when usually countries would end up in war. And of course, between the two world's largest nuclear powers, this is a disaster. This is a public episode

Rumble linkDr. Alan Sabrosky continues his “first Friday of the month” slot with a timely discussion of two naval anniversaries: the D-Day invasion and Israel’s attack on the USS Liberty.We also consider: What might Russia do in response to US & West expanding long-range attacks and taking out Russia’s early warning radar? Possible Russian responses are discussed these two stories:Should Vladimir Putin Call His Shot on a NATO Brushback Pitch? by Ron Unz Putin warns that Russia could provide long-range weapons to others to strike Western targets Dr. Alan Sabrosky is the former Head of Strategic Studies at the US Army War College. He expresses his Jewish heritage via cuisine, not foreign policy. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkThe discussion of these issues continues on today’s live radio show with Alan Sabrosky and tomorrow’s False Flag Weekly News with J.Michael Springmann.Welcome to Truth Jihad Audio Visual. I'm Kevin Barrett doing this podcast in one form or another since 2006, bringing on a whole lot of the most interesting outside-the-box thinkers and troublemakers. And we're going to continue in that tradition today with the author of a terrific new book Charlottesville and the Death of Free Speech. That's Jason Kessler, who actually was the permit holder at the Charlottesville rally in August of 2017. So, hey, welcome, Jason, and congratulations on this great book.Thank you very much. I appreciate you having me on.Yeah, well, I appreciate your book. It confirmed a lot of my suspicions, since I get information from both the usual mainstream sources and the alternative sources, and I noticed this is one of those cases where you really have to look at the alternative sources. Because they (the mainstream sources) were putting out such a one-sided propaganda narrative. And your side of the story is, frankly, a heck of a lot more convincing than the mainstream take..So here's a shot of the book, and let's get into it. You got involved in activism, and you make it clear you had three main issues: Free speech, save the Robert E. Lee monument in your home town of Charlottesville, and “it's OK to be white.” And those three issues kind of come together. So let’s talk about how you took up those issues.Sure. So it was a long process. I started out actually on the left, but not really today's left. It was more about being anti-war. I opposed the Iraq war during the George W. Bush presidency. But during the Obama administration, things started to become very racialized from my perspective, where the news sources I was relying on, like NPR and Huffington Post, seemed to be portraying white men constantly as the bad guys. They were picking up this very politicized narrative about supposedly innocent black men being gunned down by police. And when I would look into alternative information sources on that, I could see that these were actually hardened criminals. There were extenuating circumstances like reaching for a police officer's gun, etc. And then the reaction afterwards with black people rioting in these cities and killing people, causing property damage, it just seemed like they were just papering over that, like it didn't even matter.So it caused me to really lose faith in the left and start to move towards something else, which is where I'm at now, which is not really liberal or conservative, but my primary issue is... that white people are under attack.You were an Obama voter. So it's not like you came into this whole thing with some kind of racial animus, right?No, I, and still to this day, I don't really harbor like hate in my heart or whatever. I say controversial things online sometimes because the reaction to even tepid race realism is so over the top. If you're a free speech guy, at a certain point, you're just like, “screw it. Sometimes I'm just going to say very controversial things because I don't like people telling me what I can and can't say.”That makes sense to me. And I can kind of see how you pull all these things together, because to my mind, one of the good things about our American heritage is the First Amendment. We can hash out our differences without shooting at each other, which a lot of Americans did back in the day, but it's always better to hash it out by arguing, and that's what we're supposed to be able to do. But we really can't so much any more. I think you make a good argument in this book that free speech died in Charlottesville. You quote Hunter S. Thompson. In Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas he has that famous line about how this whole protest anti-Vietnam hippie thing, the wave crested and then it rolled back. And you stand here halfway to Las Vegas or whatever, and you can see where the wave rolled back. And we can kind of see the wave of free speech rolling back. I keep asking, when did the internet suddenly become totally censored, or when did they start? When did the whole thing change? And it's obviously in the mid—like 2016-ish, 2017-ish, but I think you're right. I think and Charlottesville might be the key moment.Yeah, I talk a little bit about the aftermath of Charlottesville and how free speech has been affected. There are obviously still some battlegrounds going on in free speech with the online discussion and Elon Musk buying Twitter. So people are still fighting for their right to be able to speak online. But Charlottesville was certainly the death of the ability of people to have unrestricted access to the public square to air their grievances. Because in Charlottesville, you just had an unthinkable situation where someone like myself, who believed in these ACLU free speech cases, who believed in the free speech movement that began in Berkeley, California i

Press TV Rumble linkHello and welcome to Press TV Spotlight. I'm Marcia Hashemi. Thanks so much for being with us. The leader of Iran's Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has said that due to Al-Aqsa flood operation, the issue of Palestine is the primary issue in the world today. He was speaking at a gathering commemorating the 35th anniversary of the passing away of the founder of the Islamic Revolution, Imam Khomeini. Ayatollah Khamenei also reflected on Imam Khomeini's steadfast support for Palestine and how his insight not only helped us understand the situation of Palestine, but Iran, the region, and the world.I'd like to welcome out of London Shabir Razvi, political analyst. Thank you so much, Shabir, for being with us. Let's start off with the world today and the world years ago, and especially what has changed. One, looking at the place of Iran, and two, looking at the Palestinian issue.Shabir Razvi: Thank you very much for the kind invitation. Of course, the world is a different place, as you quite rightly pointed out. And those of us who are of a certain age have lived through this historic moment from the time of the inception of the Islamic Revolution in 1979 and through all the contours that it has taken in the last years, particularly the sad demise of the founder and the leader of the Islamic Revolution. Imam Khomeini, may the Almighty be pleased with him and have mercy on him, was really an individual that resonated very clearly with not only the Muslims globally, but with all the oppressed people of the world.Because in reality, Imam Khomeini was a religious scholar and his sort of thinking really sort of came out from the Holy Quran and the teachings of Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him and his family. So the reality is that whatever issues that Imam Khomeini wanted to deal with were in light of what Islam has taught humanity. The two key principles from the Quranic point of view are—I'll use the Arabic word and translate it for your esteemed audience—is to be really fighting against the mustakbireen (arrogant powers) and to be with the oppressed people, the mustazafeen.So this is the sort of divine message that Imam Khomeini was able to present to the world. Hence the reason why as soon as the Islamic revolution came on the horizon, it discontinued the relationship with the apartheid regime in South Africa, and gave the Zionist embassy in Tehran to the Palestinians, and of course took the cause of the Palestinians to the forefront—the pivot, the foundation of really supporting the oppressed people in that manner.I was lucky and very privileged to have participated in the funeral of Imam Khomeini years ago. And at that time, it was June, very hot weather, and people walked from many cities close by to Tehran to participate. It was the largest funeral that was ever held (10 million people, one-sixth of Iran’s population.) And I don't think any other funeral has come close to it in the last years or prior to it.So that really showed the love that the Iranian nation had for the founder of the Islamic Revolution. Years later, what we see is that Iran is no longer a weak country. Iran has developed in all walks of life, from military activities to technology, science, manpower building. Iran has been successful in so many fields, considering that it has been under sanctions for the last years, sanctions which have created huge problems for the ordinary people. But nonetheless, it is educating the people. It has sort of become a power in West Asia without any doubt at all. Even the foes of the Islamic revolution really have to acknowledge the fact that Iran, the Islamic Republic of Iran, is not a nation that can be walked over.And it's alliances which have built in the last years. One recalls that Iran had to experience the eight year imposed war by Saddam in the beginning of the revolution. Obviously, the European nations, America and its allies, wanted to destroy the infant Islamic revolution at that time, but they did not succeed.Kevin Barrett, expert in West Asian affairs out of Morocco. Kevin, thanks for being with us. Your thoughts on the leader of the revolution’s comments that due to the Al-Aqsa Storm operation, that Palestine has become the primary issue in the world. How important is this?He's absolutely right.He nailed it. He was correct in observing that prior to October 7th, the Zionists had been making serious inroads among some of the more corrupt leadership entities in the region and had managed to sideline the Palestinian issue from the consciousness of much of the world. Events were moving in a direction that without any major change could have led to a growing tacit acceptance of this genocide of Palestine that's been ongoing since 1948.And October 7th changed everything. It showed that just like Hezbollah was able to defeat the Israeli military in 2006, that the combined Palestinian resistance led by Hamas was able to inflict a tremendous strategic defeat on the Isr

Rumble link Bitchute linkIn the wake of Trump’s historic conviction, this week’s False Flag Weekly News raised the question: Could an alternative candidate actually become president? As someone who has voted for a long list of alternative candidates, including RFK Jr. in 2020, I really ought to be more excited about this year’s race. RFK Jr., my 2020 choice, is the first non-duopoly candidate since Ross Perot to poll in double digits. And then there’s Trump, whose absurd, rigged conviction on 34 felony counts adds to his credentials as someone the Establishment loves to hate.But which Establishment? Trump’s first term was run by neocons who make Joe Biden look like Mother Theresa. Today, the Zionist billionaires who are bribing universities, police, and thugs to crush campus anti-genocide protests are following Netanyahu’s marching orders and going all out to re-install Trump. If I were a paranoid conspiracy theorist, I might imagine that the real Establishment is using reverse psychology on the unruly electorate. The banksters need a blustery macho Republican president who can incite the US military to fight World War III, and Trump is the only game in town. So they stage blatantly unfair persecutions of Trump to whip up sympathy for Orange Caesar not just among his base, but also with the independent and minority voters Trump needs to win.Who is this Establishment, you ask? Fadi Lama calls them “the money power.” Mees Baaijen calls them “Glafia” (globalist mafia). Mujahid Kamran calls them “the international bankers.” James Perloff largely agrees with all three, and like Kamran uses the catchphrase New World Order. My False Flag Weekly News co-hosts sometimes violate the Dave Chappelle rule: “Two words in English language you should never say – ‘The’ and ‘Jews’.” But I don’t think the Money Power a.k.a. Glafia a.k.a. international bankers a.k.a. New World Order is an exclusively Jewish thing. It’s just a disproportionately Jewish thing. Some of the bankers aren’t Jewish. Those who are vary in their degree of devotion to Jewish tribal matters in general and Israel in particular. And of course the majority of Jews are only tangentially involved, if at all, with the usury-driven world takeover project. So as Dave Chappelle might say: “Three words in the English language you should always say — ‘not,’ ‘all,’ and ‘Jews.’”Still, it’s pretty obvious who’s really in charge. Cat McGuire explains on this week’s False Flag Weekly News:Kevin Barrett: (Elon Musk tweeted) that if Trump gets arrested, he'll be reelected in a landslide victory. And David Icke says: That's the idea.So, Cat, maybe it's not that they want to have a Biden dictatorship with Trump in jail and no more elections while they wage World War Three. Maybe they want to put Trump in office to wage World War Three. Because frankly, Cat, I don't think Biden can mobilize the kind of guys who like to go off to fight wars. He might be able to mobilize a few rainbow flag waving people of indeterminate gender, but I don't know if those people are going to win any wars for him. Whereas if Trump is in office and he's banging the war drum, he might actually get some people with a couple of grams of testosterone left in their bloodstreams to go marching after him.Cat McGuire: Right. That's a very good point. Because ultimately Trump’s for the genocide. Because he's completely controlled by our ZOG rulers. And he's not going to be doing that much different himself if he were to get in. He’s just like we saw with (Woodrow) Wilson and FDR. They ran on a peace ticket. And then once they got in, their Jewish controllers forced them to go to war.I think Trump would go to war, even though he claims not to want it. So, yeah, it could be a backhanded way…because I think they installed him just to create more Trump derangement syndrome which has made our country more divisive. So put him back in and he'll do their bidding all the while keeping our country more divided, because it's then Trump derangement syndrome on even more steroids.Kevin Barrett: When Trump was in office, that was the war party. He put in Pompeo, Bolton, Nikki Haley. All of those people are the hardcore Team B neocon war party people. And they launched the COVID bioattack on China. They nearly started World War III by assassinating General Soleimani. And I have no doubt that if Trump won in 2024 and appointed the same type of people, that would be a World War Three cabinet for sure. It would make Biden look like a peacenik.RFK Jr.: No Alternative to GenocideIf Trump might actually be the Ziocon war party’s preferred candidate, what about RFK Jr.? I wrote him in for president in 2020 as a protest vote. Why? Because he’s intelligent, articulate, right on many issues, and a living rebuke to the forces that killed his father and uncle…or so I thought at the time. But now, it seems that Hamlet has joined forces with Claudius. As I wrote in my new Crescent International article:As of June, 2024, Israel’s grad

Rumble link Bitchute linkPress TV: Joining us now for our program is John Steppling, author and commentator, joining us from Norway, and also Dr. Kevin Barrett, editor at Veterans Today, joining us out of Saidia, Morocco. Gentlemen, I'd like to welcome you both to the program.I guess we'll start there in Morocco with Dr. Kevin Barrett. Now, Dr. Barrett, I want to read also something in addition to the story. I have a little article here. It says, in the U.S., over 2,950 protesters have been arrested, including faculty members and professors, on over 60 university campuses. On May 7th protests spread across Europe as well, with mass arrests in the Netherlands, and by the 12th of May, 20 encampments had been established in the United Kingdom and across universities in Australia and Canada. This article is going up to the 12th, about 18 or 19 days ago. And as you very well know there's the UCLA arrests that took place, the 80 here. So we're well over 3,200 arrests on sixty-plus campuses just in the United States alone. What kind of impact does this have in getting the message out, doctor?Kevin Barrett: I think these students are doing the right thing strategically as well as morally, because they know that the reaction is going to be grotesquely exaggerated and actually non-strategic from the other side. What we're seeing is that these students are putting up their tents and they're putting up signs and they're behaving peacefully.And the billionaire Zionist donors to the university are going crazy. They are reacting with great stress. They're neurotic. They freak out. They immediately start pulling out all the stops to pressure the universities to get rid of these encampments. Because these billionaire Zionists, I think deep down inside, they are ashamed of the genocide that they and their tribe are committing. And so they're psychologically conflicted. So they use their enormous power to basically force the universities to do what universities never do (shut down peaceful protests).Thank you, Dr. Barrett. John Steppling, welcome to the conversation. John, just last week, the leader of Iran's Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei, said these kids are all on the right side of history, and they are now an integral part of the resistance movement front. So obviously their message is getting out. Palestinians and the Palestinian resistance has also acknowledged them. Their movement, how far does it go in isolating the Israeli regime? John Steppling: Well I think public opinion throughout the world is overwhelmingly pro-Palestinian. It's hard sometimes to remember that, because the media is controlled by Western governments and they have a firm grasp of the narrative that they want to impose on all of this. If you read the coverage of the Santa Cruz protests, the headlines are “Israel Hamas protests.” They had to get in the word Hamas, because that's a buzzword for, you know, the bogeyman, evil terrorists, etc.But all of this I think, is failing because the protests are growing no matter the heavy-handed police response, as was true in 1968, and these protests echo those anti-war protests. The police crackdown is excessive and disproportionate and often very brutal. And in this case we're seeing professors beaten, and certainly many students have been.So the message is, I think, been disseminated. People are horrified by this genocide across the world. The only place you don't see this horror is in Western governments and in many of the Arab governments. I mean, this has to constantly be reiterated. There's Sisi in Egypt, and King Abdullah in Jordan, and in the UAE Zayed bin Salman, King Mohammed in Morocco. I mean, these leaders function as... as Zionists, essentially. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkFadi Lama discusses his book Why the West Can’t Win: From Bretton Woods to a Multipolar World. Lama’s thesis is that the West, dominated by private central bankers a.k.a. “the Money Power,” has met its match in the form of the RIC (Russia-Iran-China) de facto alliance. Whereas the Money Power Empire uses slogans like liberalism and democracy to disguise its efforts to construct a one-world totalitarian plutocracy, the RIC axis supports multipolar civilizational sovereignty including the preservation of traditional collective values that bind together religions, nations, and families. According to Lama, world power trends favor RIC, which has been making rapid economic, technological, and military gains, even as the Money Power Empire loses control over energy resources.Dr. Fadi Lama is an International Adviser for the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). He is a consultant in the fields of geoeconomics, industry, SMEs and academia. Fadi received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology, an MSc in Manufacturing Technology from The City University of London, and his BE in Mechanical Engineering from the American University of Beirut.___Excerpts:Kevin Barrett: And your book does make it clear how the change in the military technology that Andrei Martinov has written about is so relevant to the fact that today the BRICS countries or the RIC, the Russia-Iran-China axis that you write about, are able to now challenge the US economically (thanks to their military power). Because we're moving into a stage of military parity, and maybe beyond parity. Fadi Lama: Tell me, what's the real balance of military power now? What parity? Economic parity or military parity?Well, I was saying we're moving into the era of military parity. Where we are in that process, I don't know.Military parity? That disappeared a long time ago. Now, there is no parity at all. The power of the RIC (Russia-Iran-China) is much greater. I will take a quote from—I think it was Larry Johnson, who stated that the US is waging war similar to having an army of cavalry in World War II.Let me put across some important facts people are not aware of. As you have noticed in the book, everything has at least two references that corroborate it. So, regarding US Army ground forces, these were finished, obliterated, in Iraq. Most people are not aware that the U.S. Army had more casualties in Iraq than in the Vietnam War. They give you the number, this funny number of whatever it is. The actual number was, until the end of March, more than the Vietnam War.What was done was like creative accounting. How do you define that in the theater?Like in Vietnam, if you went to Vietnam and you died, you were considered to be a casualty of the war. In the war on Iraq and Afghanistan, they made the definition “dead in the theater” and “dead not in the theater.” What's the dead in the theater? I gave this example many times… And the missile comes in at me and I'm pulverized. There's nothing to pick up. All the other nine are dead. Somebody's head is falling off. Another is cut into three parts or whatever the ambulance comes and picks all these parts—the helicopter ambulance or whatever, all these that were picked up are not considered dead in the theater. They died while not deployed (but rather, supposedly during evacuation or hospitalization).Another totally different angle that corroborates this is a conference that was held in the Kennedy School in Harvard about the cost ofthe Iraq and Afghanistan war. And there they cite that total number of rotated service men and women was something like 2.5 million. And those service men and women who had compensation claims due to injury were about 1.25 million, or half the total. Now calculate the deaths. One quarter…if you even, if you go to one tenth, that's 125,000.So the the the army the ground forces were obliterated. Hence Obama came up with this innovative doctrine of “leading from behind.” (Hiring mercenaries and terrorists and client states and generally using proxies. -KB) So the ground forces are gone. What do you have left? The Navy. The Navy is used to project power.After the January hit of Ain al-Assad base (Iran’s retaliation for the American assassination of General Soleimani) I show in the book the image analysis (of Iran’s bulls-eye missile strikes). And this meant that aircraft carriers were transformed from a platform for projecting power into a platform with hostages. The analysis is detailed in the book.So if an empire cannot project power, it's no longer an empire.In the 1990s they lost Venezuela, which was under their control. Russia's oil was with the oligarchs, under their control. Of the top four, only Iran was not in their control. Today, of the top four, only Saudi Arabia, number four, is mostly under their control.As you point out, Saudi Arabia is becoming less willing to obey every order they get from the empire.First they ent

Rumble link Bitchute linkCat McGuire will discuss Kevin MacDonald’s article and related topics on tomorrow’s False Flag Weekly NewsEvolutionary psychology scholar Kevin MacDonald discussers his new article “The Extreme Hyper-Ethnocentrism of Jews on Display in Israeli Attitudes Toward the Gaza War.” In it, he writes: “At least until the Gaza war, Jews have successfully depicted themselves as moral paragons and as champions of the downtrodden in the contemporary West…This Jewish pose of moral superiority is a dangerous delusion, and we must be realistic what the future holds as Whites continue to lose political power in all Western countries. When the gloves come off, there is no limit to what Jews in power may do if their present power throughout the West continues to increase. The ubiquitous multicultural propaganda of ethnic groups living in harmony throughout the West will quickly be transformed into a war of revenge for putative historical grievances that Jews harbor against the West, from the destruction of the Second Temple by the Romans to the events of World War II. This same revenge was fatal to many millions of Russians and Ukrainians. It’s the fate of the Palestinians that we are seeing unfold before our eyes.”Kevin MacDonald is a retired professor of psychology at California State University, Long Beach (CSULB), best known for his controversial application of evolutionary psychology to characterize Jewish behavior as a “group evolutionary strategy.” He is the editor of the Occidental Observer.Excerpt:Kevin Barrett: So let's talk about your new article on “The Extreme Hyper-Ethnocentrism of Jews on Display in Israeli Attitudes Toward the Gaza War.” One striking thing about your article is the serious warning that the fate of Gaza could be the fate of other countries and of the West. A lot of people, of course, would think that's exaggerated. I'm not so sure. So maybe you can elaborate on that.Kevin MacDonald: Well, every time Jews have had absolute power, as they did in the Soviet Union for years, they have exercised it brutally against their enemies. And I'm concerned that we'll see that again. And you see it if you look at the Old Testament, the injunctions and desires for genocide of these people who are their enemies. And all the Jewish religious writing saying basically that Gentiles are another species, they're below us, they're basically animals, and that sort of thing.And then you see that rhetoric regarding the Palestinians. And you will see that regarding Europeans, because if and when we lose power—we haven't lost power yet, obviously—but I'm concerned about the future because clearly the Jewish establishment is desiring more and more immigration. So it'll be a non-European country. All the Western European countries, United States, Canada, Australia, they will all be minority white countries. At some point, white people may not have enough power, political power, to really resist what is going on. And I just fear that Jewish ethics is entirely self-centered. It's sort of the interest of the group, nothing more, and completely the opposite of Western ethics, which is universalist: categorical imperatives, basically do what anybody else could do in that situation, you'd be okay with it. So it's like that sort of Western universalism, which is unique in the world, really. Other cultures tend to be very ethnocentric, and they privilege their own group. But the West has this long liberal tradition, really stemming from the Enlightenment, but in a way going back earlier than that. And I trace it back to evolutionary roots in my book on Western individualism. There's this sense that we should be universalists. It's the moral thing to do, that we should basically take care of other people and see their point of view and all that.Jewish ethics is completely foreign. You know, it's like, you don't care about what they think. And the more Orthodox you get (the more ethnocentric.) And the Orthodox have taken over Israel.Today I got this email from Jonathan Greenblatt, the head of the ADL, and he's been in Israel. He come back with this message and basically he says, “You know, what happened on October 7th was anti-Semitism.” And you always see this by the Jewish apologists, that there is no context to what happened on October 7th. There's nothing about the blockade that's been ongoing, nothing about all the oppressive policies that Israel's engaged in over the years. And what Israel's doing is absolutely destroying Gaza. It'll never really come back for years and years, if ever. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble linkIs a university professor’s job to make students regurgitate his own views? Or is it, rather, to call attention to the most noteworthy extant interpretations, and encourage students to use critical thinking to come to their own conclusions?My academic training favored the latter approach, perhaps because I was fortunate enough not to study under any egotistical academic superstars. (My dissertation advisor, the late Harold Scheub, was only a semi-superstar in the somewhat marginal field of African Languages and Literature.) But plenty of people, inside and especially outside the academy, are terrified of teachers who encourage students to think for themselves. My long-time 9/11 truth colleague Prof. Anthony Hall, who spent years being hounded by the ADL over an incriminating image that someone planted on his Facebook page, knows that better than anyone. Tony recently posted on the “Free Speech Crisis at our Universities.”Left-wing censors want students indoctrinated with the “Canadian residential school holocaust” narrative (among other holocaust narratives). They want to silence skeptics, and fire professors who “platform” them.Right-wing censors want students indoctrinated with pro-Israel narratives. They want to fire administrators and professors who have encouraged the on-campus critical thinking that produced the current wave of anti-genocide protests. These Zionist-financed ConInc inquisitors are pushing today’s version of Hannity and O’Reilly’s 2006 crusade against the 9/11 truth movement in general, and its academic wing in particular.Should professors profess only approved ideas, and force students to regurgitate them verbatim? That might be a good educational philosophy at Bill O’Reilly University. Below is the still-amusing transcript of Bill O’Reilly’s unbelievably smarmy, moronic, arrogant hectoring of two of my “Islam: Religion and Culture” students on October 11, 2006.Bill O’Reilly Interviews “Madman” Kevin Barrett’s Students Bill O’Reilly: Impact segment tonight: You may remember University of Wisconsin instructor Kevin Barrett saying that the USA attacked itself on 9/11 and that America is behind the terrorism in Iraq. That caused a great outcry, but Barrett hasn't pulled back a bit.Kevin Barrett audio clip: It's happening, you know, largely through this false flag terrorism. It looks to me like, not only 9/11, but also Madrid, the Bali hotel bombing, and probably most of these so-called Zarqawi-style bombings in Iraq are all false flag operations being carried out by a special wing of probably U.S. or Western military intelligence.Bill O’Reilly: Now this is just insane. Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle said the university should fire Barrett, but of course it's not happening. University Provost Patrick Farrell has retained Barrett, but has warned him to stop seeking publicity. However, the story doesn't end there. Barrett is now requiring his students to buy his book, which compares President Bush to Adolf Hitler. Joining us now from Madison is Molly Sessler, a student in Barrett's “Islam: Religion and Culture” class, and Jenna Pryor, the managing editor at the conservative student newspaper at UW.I'll begin with you, Ms. Pryor. You know, there comes a point where academic standards have to be held, upheld, at any major university. And here, this man runs around saying all these things with no backup, no proof, nothing. He's considered a crank and a kook by most academics. And how's it going down on the University of Wisconsin campus?Jenna Pryor: You know, you're absolutely right. And it's becoming more and more embarrassing. You know, a few years ago when I applied and was accepted to the UW, it was my number one choice because of the prestige it had not only in Wisconsin, but nationwide. And I just feel like day by day with Mr. Barrett, that prestige is slowly eroding. I mean, we have this guy saying these things, which are perfectly reasonable for his own personal opinions, but are not facts, are not peer-reviewed scientific evidence by any means, are just basically his opinions on Republicans and President Bush, and passing them off as testable knowledge in his class, forcing students to read it, forcing students to take tests on it, forcing students to repeat it. It's embarrassing. And you're absolutely right when it comes to academic standards. I mean, for other professors at the UW, it must be extremely embarrassing for them to have a peer of theirs—Bill O’Reilly: Is it embarrassing, though? Is it embarrassing? Have other professors said anything about it?Jenna Pryor: I think they are. I've seen some comments online from some other professors that are embarrassed by this. Bill O’Reilly: I don't know if that's true. I haven't seen any outcry by the university officials, the hierarchy, or the professors at all. And Ms. Sessler, you're actually taking this course. Now, why would you take a course from a guy who basically is putting forth a preposterous scenario and making statem

Rumble link Bitchute linkPress TVA UN agency has warned that an estimated 15-thousand pregnant women are among half of Gaza's population that is at the risk of an imminent famine. The United Nations Population Fund attributes the situation to the continued Israeli blockade on life-saving aid to Gaza. The UNPF said that Israel has closed the doors to humanitarian aid and opened the gates to starvation in the territory. The agency added, the catastrophe is incomprehensible and entirely avoidable. The UN and other international aid agencies have repeatedly issued such warnings to Israel but to no avail. Israeli forces on the ground have rather attacked aid workers and Palestinians waiting for food assistance on numerous occasions. According to the UN, 254 aid workers have been killed since Israel launched its war on Gaza late last year.Kevin Barrett, when you take a look at the story here, a UN agency warning about the pregnant women, that's a headline in itself. And then you have the fact that they're at risk of famine. That's another headline. I'm looking at this pier that the U.S. built, which I believe a quarter of it is now broken off and sailed off into Ashdod. Isn't that reflective of the type of disconnect from reality of the depth of the situation that the U.S. is in when it comes to how it could stop all of this from happening? We're giving up hope on the Israeli regime, by the way.Kevin Barrett: Yes, the U.S. is showing complete incompetence or really much worse. It's actually showing that it is participating with genocidal intent in this genocidal campaign against Gaza. The pier breaking off does symbolize that incompetence, but just building the pier in the first place was obviously not really designed to deal with this situation. The United States could stop this catastrophe instantly with one phone call from the Biden White House ordering the Israelis to stop their genocide campaign, with the threat of everything that the United States could do to Israel theoretically, up to and including declaring war on this genocidal state as part of a relief operation. The United States theoretically could do all sorts of things.But wouldn't have to go nearly that far. All it would have to do is threaten a reversal of longstanding U.S. support for Israel and a complete cessation of any funding and diplomatic efforts, and to support Palestine instead of Israel. The United States is supposed to be a sovereign country and theoretically could do all of those things. But instead, because the United States has been taken over by this neoconservative Zionist wing of foreign policy thinkers who are basically loyal to the extreme expansionist designs of the Likudniks in Israel, the United States has been completely complicit and has simply done these PR stunts, such as building a pier that just breaks off. Even if the pier were functioning, it wouldn't come even close to stopping this famine that, as we heard, is threatening the pregnant women of Gaza with utter starvation. The pier wouldn't fix that, even if it were functioning. It would at most allow a small proportion of what's needed in.What's needed is to open the Rafah border crossing. There's plenty of aid waiting there. And the Israelis are blocking that. And the Americans can tell them to open it up any time that the United States wants to. But it apparently doesn't want to, making US leaders equally complicit in genocide. And this genocide campaign is deliberately targeting women and children. The Israelis have been very clear and blunt about this for years,that they are targeting Palestinian women and children. The IDF soldiers proudly wear one-shot, two-kills T-shirts showing an image of a pregnant Palestinian woman with a target on her belly. And Ayelet Sheked, the minister in Israel, has called for Israel to exterminate the so-called little snakes, meaning Palestinian children, as well as the mothers who bear them. And these are just a couple of examples of the clear genocidal intent to exterminate Palestinian women and children coming from the entire leadership class of the state of Israel, supported by the entire leadership class of the United States of America. Both of those leadership classes need to be arrested and put on trial for genocide, convicted and executed.We know that the ICJ in particular and also the ICC now have obviously zoomed in on the Israeli regime in terms of issuing statements and condemnations, the latest from the ICC in terms of the arrest warrants. But don't you think that the focus should also be on the U.S.? If Israel is executing and is the gun that's shooting, the U.S. is providing the bullets. So shouldn't the U.S. also be held accountable in that respect and the focus to be on the U.S. ?Sakina Dattoo: The U.S. is obviously accountable. However, expecting the U.S. to do anything to stop this genocide, I think, is asking too much. The U.S. is not an independent country anymore. It is run and controlled by the AIPAC, which

Rumble link Bitchute link FFWN post with links and information on E. Michael Jones’ “Dangers of Beauty” conference The world stands aghast as the genocidal Zionist entity lashes out in its death throes, inflicting pointless mayhem on the civilians of Palestine and the leadership of Iran. And a collective global reaction is setting in. The International Criminal Court is seeking an arrest warrant for Netanyahu, the International Court of Justice has ordered Israel to withdraw from Rafah, and European countries are lining up to join the rest of the world in recognizing the state of Palestine.Could the rebirth of the nation of Palestine coincide with, and signify, a re-emergence of morality in world affairs? That would be no small change. As False Flag Weekly News co-host and Culture Wars editor Dr. E. Michael Jones notes, the rulers of the Anglo-Zionist Empire believe that “truth is the opinion of the powerful”—and hold the same view of morality. That view is not entirely unfounded, since those rulers have long enjoyed sufficient power to impose their versions of truth and morality on the world. If the Jewish-Protestant American empire is “a preacher with a gun,” as Dr. Jones says, it has been preaching lies at gunpoint at least since it sanctified and immortalized war propaganda in the form of the sacred Holocaust narrative after World War II. With the demise of the Soviet Union in 1989, the empire’s capacity to enshrine lies with force became virtually limitless. Truth and morality became, for all practical purposes, whatever the lying, immoral managers of empire said they were. Karl Rove famously mocked those who failed to notice this transition as “the reality-based community” and boasted (no doubt with a nod and a wink to the absurdity of the official story of 9/11) that “we create our own reality now.” (And our own morality with it, no doubt.)The Zionists have gone the furthest in calling lies truth, and morality whatever they can get away with. While planning and perpetrating genocide for more than a century, and inflicting the most sadistic, unspeakable, often strategically superfluous tortures on anyone who gets in their way, the Zionists have cast themselves as quintessential victims. That long-running ruse, however, has reached its expiration date. With the genocide of Gaza, the mask has come off. The psychopathic serial killer has been unveiled.Though the neocon Zionists still control the US empire, that empire no longer dominates the world the way it did just a decade ago. The Zionists have run it into the ground. By staging 9/11 as the PR launch for $7 trillion worth of criminal wars for Israel, the neocons hollowed out the US, rendering it morally as well as fiscally bankrupt, and diverting its attention from the economic rise of China, Russia, and other independent powers. So why will the emerging multipolar world coincide with a return to morality? Because human beings are moral creatures. Like many other animals only more so, humans have an innate moral sense and experience shock, outrage, and the need to take action when moral norms are violated. Those natural reactions can be temporarily suppressed under certain conditions, notably pathocratic tyranny. And that is what we have been living under: the “absolute power corrupts absolutely” regime of the self-styled unipolar hegemon. As it comes apart, global power will become a complex process of negotiation involving many stakeholders, who will regularly appeal to the moral sense of their negotiating partners and adversaries. Revenge for the Gaza Genocide: What Would Zionist-Style “Proportionality” Look Like?The need for negotiations based on shared commitment to win-win outcomes, informed by universal morality rather than tribal egotism, may be illustrated by considering the alternative: an endless cycle of vengeance featuring ever-more-lethal technologies. Specifically, how might this play out in the Zionism-versus-Palestine conflict?Prior to the October 7 al-Aqsa Storm raid, Israel had been steadily killing Palestinians, by the thousands, for decades. Palestinian retaliation had been relatively minor by comparison, inflicting less than 10% of the deaths and casualties on Israelis that the Zionists had inflicted on them. The Al-Aqsa Storm concentration camp breakout killed about 1100 Israelis, roughly half of whom were active military, police, or security. Israel responded by indiscriminately flattening most of Gaza. As I write, the official Gaza death toll is over 36,000, meaning bodies extracted from rubble and identified, while unofficial estimates of the total dead exceed 200,000. Virtually all the Gaza victims are civilians, two thirds being women and children.As a conservative estimate, Israel’s genocidal “retaliation” has killed 60 times as many civilians as died on October 7th (the majority of whom were probably killed by Israeli forces, not by Hamas). So if Palestine were to “retaliate” against Israel in the same way that Israel “r

Rumble link Bitchute linkRichard Gage, AIA, is best known for his work on controlled demolitions at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. Recently he has taken an interest in questions about what really happened during the Palestinian Resistance’s Al-Aqsa Storm operation on October 7, including speculation about Israeli foreknowledge. Richard has been invited to speak at the Red Pill Expo in Rapid City South Dakota on June 15/16 on “Gaza: the astounding parallels with 911.”For my take on the limitations of Richard’s thesis, see “9/11 and October 7: Parallels—and Stark Differences.”Excerpt:Richard Gage: There are parallels…astounding parallels of Gaza and 9/11. And yeah, let's do get into it. I'll share my screen and we'll see what we can learn in addition to what you have shared. And maybe we'll find that what you have said is corroborated, Kevin.One thing we... It takes courage to look at these facts, whether it's 9/11 or Gaza, because the facts betray common knowledge and official narratives and our own cognitive dissonance. We've all had to overcome our worldview, me certainly as an architect, confronting the hellscape of three skyscrapers coming down to with almost 3000 people in them. So yeah, we're going to be taking a deep dive and finding out what these parallels are and who's complicit.This nine 11 moment of Israel's: Curiously, in the context of what you've said, they had a bit of their own 9-11 moment back in 2001 as well. These events forced radical changes politically, economically, and geopolitically. So we have to ask the question, were these the intended outcomes, and the process through which they were derived an artificial one? That's what we're gonna be looking at today.We have to look for patterns, connect the dots, and ask questions fearlessly. Questions like, what always follows these types of events? There's a common denominator, war: an intended outcome. What triggers war historically? False flag events.Let's look at false flag events: A political or military action that's made to appear to have been carried out by a group that's not actually responsible. This is actually in the dictionary. This isn't conspiracy theory lore. This is well documented. Academic Lance de Haven Smith defines something even greater in terms of scope: State crimes against democracy, SCADs. In contrast to conspiracy theories, he says, which speculate about each suspicious event in isolation, the SCAD construct delineates a general category of criminality and calls for crimes that fit this category to be examined comparatively. SCADs often appear where presidential politics and foreign policy intersect. SCADs differ from earlier forms of political corruption in that they frequentlySCADs differ from earlier forms of political corruption in that they frequently involve political, military, and/or economic elites at the very highest levels of the social and political order.So do the events of 9-11 and Gaza share any of these SCAD features? It turns out that they do. Because what they do is they create a problem, right? And part of that is parallel number one, previously established geostrategic goals coveting the natural resources of the target territory.There's one part of a SCAD parallel to a rich history of recent and historic false flag operations.Parallel three, politically useful controlled patsies. This is where Kevin and I will have some disagreement and some discussion on this. (Unlike Hamas and its Resistance partners, Al-Qaeda was a purely synthetic patsy, not a legitimate resistance group. -KB)Parallel four, a triggering event, an innovative attack with dubious origins, a manufactured invasion from foreign operatives.Parallel five, a catastrophic intelligence failure,Parallel six, a military stand down with an obvious uncharacteristic delay in response.Parallel seven, foreknowledge of the attacks.Parallel eight, uncontrolled delight during the attacks, i.e. dancing Israelis on 9/11.Kevin Barrett: Wait, Richard, were there dancing Israelis on October 7th too?Richard Gage: Yes, and I'm going to show them to you... This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Bitchute link Rumble link For more on this topic check out tomorrow’s False Flag Weekly News with E. Michael JonesOn-scene reporting specialist Brett Redmayne-Titley discusses his new article “UC’s War For Your Mind?: Students Defeat Cops in Opening Battle.” It provides an in-depth look at one of the more than 100 protests/encampments that have sprung up on American campuses protesting the genocide of Gaza: “On the weekend of April 27, 2024, UC/ San Diego campus administrators got wind that Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) was going to set up an ‘encampment’ at a point yet unknown. They had been waiting for this opening salvo of the constant of conscience and its visual appeal—tents—to finally come to their campus. For months, they had previously been summoned to meetings at UC Davis, UC Los Angeles, and UC Berkeley to, in part and priority, address the growing student awakening…And how to stop it.”Brett Redmayne-Titley is the author of THERE! On-Scene Reporting from a World Gone Mad.: From Ukraine to Moldova, Erdogan’s Turkey to Hizbullah’s Lebanon, the US Police Killing of Evan Quik and Further Down the Rabbit Hole of Media Lies. His work is archived at WatchingRomeBurn.uk.The interview begins:B R-T: We're dealing with a very moral issue here, one that I coined as the constant of conscience. I think that anyone who has the constant of conscience understands that this is indeed genocide and it has to stop. Certainly the ICJ this morning said the same thing. We're going to see the same thing from the ICC very shortly. But the students are ahead of the curve. In my articles, I use the analogy to Occupy, which as you probably remember, Kevin, I was very well invested in, actually living in the camps with the protesters, writing many articles. I believe I wrote more about Occupy than any other journalist in America because I was so invested in the organization and was very enthusiastic about it. It was a grassroots organization that was indeed really all-inclusive. And the all-inclusive nature of it sold itself to the general public. It was why Obama ruined and destroyed the camps. The camps, just like they are today at the universities, are a means of coalescence against genocide. And because it's very effective as a visual means of protest and a visual means of coalescing further in additional protests, the administration is furious, as they are about the ICJ decision. today.We're not allowed to protest genocide. We're merely allowed to accept this new definition that's being pro-offered to the students and forced down their throats, regardless of the realities in Gaza.I've been privy to a lot of what's taken place at an administrative level, and I'm afraid I cannot disclose how I'm able to do that. I can just assure your listeners that my information does come from the sources at the administrative level. Collectively, I can say that the administration doesn't give a damn about the students and their protests. They want it to stop now because they're getting their orders from the UC Regents Office, and the UC Regents Office is fervently, vociferously Zionist. And they want this to stop because it will coalesce into the streets soon with the American people now rising up against the genocide. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com