Truth Jihad Radio

Rumble link Bitchute linkJonathan Revusky refutes Sterling Harwood on the Stephen Hawking replacement hypothesis and Ryan Dawson on the “Arabs hijacked planes on 9/11” hypothesis.Excerpt:Kevin Barrett: Let's move on to the theories that you wanted to talk about. The first one being: Was Stephen Hawking replaced? We brought on Sterling Harwood and Sterling and I both said there's a kind of a strong prima facie argument that there's something really wrong with this conventional biography of Stephen Hawking, because he lived way too long after an ALS diagnosis. But then after admitting that, Sterling Harwood claimed that there's not really anything else to support (the replacement theory), and ultimately the idea that he was replaced is equally or more unlikely than some other explanation. So go ahead and explain your take on that issue.Jonathan Revusky: Well, of course he was replaced, Kevin. I mean, the whole thing is a pretty self-evident hoax. I never really thought that for anybody who read the article and actually made a point of looking at the photographic record—I sent you a link, which is sort of the main Yandex image search for Hawking, didn't I? You just type Stephen Hawking into the Yandex search engine, yandex.com, and then hit the images tab. You can do that in Google. I trust Yandex more nowadays. Google is, I think, more curated. But you get a series of images. I think the first dozen images are the latter-day Hawking, who was fairly obviously an imposter.But, you know, finally, what is interesting about this Hawking case? I mean, we have all these hoaxes, right? The Boston bombing and some crazy Arab ran over some people at the whatever Christmas market in Germany and some other crazed kid in France cut off his teacher's head and all these kinds of things that are hoaxes. But the funny thing about all of those is they're sort of one-shot deals: They occur on a specific day and then it's over. Even 9/11 left much more of a mess than these other hoaxes, that's for sure. You have all this dust and all the remains of these buildings lying around. But still, but of course, they made a point of clearing off all the junk as fast as possible. So the hoax lasted a certain number of days and was over though the aftermath of the hoax we're still living with.But the Hawking hoax, assuming it is a hoax, I've investigated enough to say it is, is just…this is a multi-decade hoax, a fairly major production, really, sort of multi-layered with a lot of different weird subplots in it. Hawking, the real Stephen Hawking, almost certainly passed away in the year 1985. You can, I think, pretty much pinpoint it.Supposedly he got pneumonia in Switzerland, in Geneva someplace and was hospitalized. And they had him on life support, these tubes coming out of him. This is the official story, by the way. What you get on Wikipedia is the official story, in essence. And what's interesting is you can read the official story and there are enough truthful elements in it that you can largely deduce the truth. Like, the claim is that Hawking is in Switzerland in order to visit CERN, the particle accelerator thing they have there somewhere near Geneva…(Read the full transcript by clicking the “transcript” button above the video image at my Substack.) This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkRyan Dawson of the Anti-Neocon Report finally joins Truth Jihad Radio, resulting in almost two hours of incendiary conversation! We discuss quite a few of the hottest and most censored topics, including what really happened on 9/11, whether Trump is really dismantling the deep state, where the next big war will be (Ryan thinks Netanyahu will finally get his long-awaited war on Iran) and how fast the US empire’s collapse will take.Ryan mentions that Epstein’s client list (check out Ryan’s video version) has been public for years—I interviewed Nick Bryant about it in early 2020—but investigative journalism has been missing in action.Transcript begins:Kevin Barrett: Welcome to the podcast version of Truth Jihad Radio. I'm Kevin Barrett doing underground radio for the internet age since 2006, although at that point there was probably as much going on on the airwaves, the actual airwaves and the satellites as there was on the internet. And now here we are. It's been well over a couple of decades, since 9/11, and that problem hasn't been solved. But some people think that Donald Trump is going to solve all our problems. He's going to reveal the UFOs. He's going to reveal the Kennedy assassins. He's going to make peace with Russia. And he somehow got a ceasefire that's barely still holding in Gaza. So, according to one view, Trump is the Messiah. On the other view, maybe he's the Antichrist, or worse, because it's all going to go to hell in a handbasket when war breaks out with Iran. And then of course, his guys are targeting China. So who are we going to talk to to try to figure all this stuff out now, when it's not that clear yet precisely where it's all going? How about Ryan Dawson of the Anti-Neocon Report? First time on my show! He's been following the same paths as me for many, many years, so it's good to finally connect. Hey. Welcome, Ryan. How's it going?Ryan Dawson: Yeah. You know, our paths have crossed a few times. I think not too long ago we were both on the same Press TV interview and I said, oh, Kevin Barrett, I wish we could do a show because I've seen your work before and it's very similar to mine, very similar to my conclusions. And it's surprising it's taken this long for us to finally do a show.Kevin Barrett: That's true. Part of the reason probably is that I don't spend too much time with anybody else's audio-visual. Partly it's a matter of time. My brain works better scanning text. My brainwaves were warped when I was a little kid and I learned to read too early in life. And so I've got this massive left brain dominance thing going: "send me text." Ryan Dawson: I still notebook everything down.Kevin Barrett: Cool. All right, well, we're both relics of another time, and you're kind of the king of anti-neocon 9/11 Truth broadcasting. But you don't write that much...Ryan Dawson: Yeah, well, I did, but it's just easier to plagiarize when you write stuff. But I don't like the word or the term 9/11 truth because I disagree with 99% of people who use that label. You know how bad that's gotten with the airplane deniers and all that stuff. I just don't like it. But yeah, I'm probably the most reasonable, heterodox take on September 11th for sure.Kevin Barrett: Well, let's get your take on that. So we both agree that the no planes planes hypothesis about New York is very, very, very likely wrong.Ryan Dawson: About all of it. There were definitely airplanes. I mean, the Pentagon's just as stupid, because you've got a big airplane sized hole with airplane parts in it, with DNA from all the passengers who were on that plane hitting the building. And they're like, I didn't see it on film, so it didn't exist.Kevin Barrett: Okay, that's going to piss off some of my audience, but too bad. Ryan Dawson: Very important to admit there's an airplane, because if you don't have the plane, you don't have the hijackers in particular. Now we fall down mid-air. And if you don't have that, then you don't have a path back to state sponsorship of September 11th from Saudi Arabia. All that disappears when you deny an airplane.Kevin Barrett: You don't believe that there were actually human hijackers responsible, do you?Ryan Dawson: I do.Kevin Barrett: Really?! Okay, well...You've gone a bridge too far for me. And here's here's my reasoning. And you can explain to me why this is wrong. The biggest,most difficult demolitions in the whole history of the demolition industry were set up and would have taken quite some time and an immense amount of money, expertise and so on, as well as all the expertise required to make it secret. So the demolition of the World Trade Center was an amazing engineering project. Those demolitions, not just the three famous buildings, the Towers and Building Seven. So they had invested a tremendous amount of effort to prepare for these spectacular demolitions that were going to be the key part of the 9/11 psyop. They had to be 100% sure that planes were going to hit those buil

Rumble link Bitchute linkCelia Farber , the journalist who did most to expose Fauci & co.’s murderous AIDS hoax, discusses her new book (co-authored with Dr. James Thorp) Sacrifice: How the Deadliest Vaccine in History Targeted the Most Vulnerable. Blurb:Sacrifice documents the true story of Dr. James Thorp, a respected doctor of maternal fetal medicine, who in 2020, finds his entire profession has lost its mind, as well as its soul. Stunned to find his colleagues take the bribe money, drink the Kool-Aid, and push the COVID-19 shots, Thorp is one of the few Ob-Gyns to bear witness and broadcast the multitude of pregnancy complications including miscarriages, stillbirths, and many other tragic outcomes resulting from the shots.One of the few doctors from the maternal-fetal medicine realm who publicly protested the Covid shots as directly deadly to his patients—unborn babies—Thorp witnessed the carnage on a daily basis firsthand, documented it, published papers, and spoke up on countless media platforms, and in Senate hearings in Washington, DC. He was terminated, without any cause, and went on to campaign around the country to get the truth out.From our interview:There are various very creepy and very revealing US government COVID websites. And I discovered those websites in the process of working on this book with Dr. James Thorpe. As we were working on the book, he and his wife, Maggie, who is an attorney, did these freedom of information requests and found the smoking gun about what kind of money and when and how went to the agencies that were put in place to protect pregnant American women to set the standard of what's safe and what isn't for pregnant American women: The American Board of Gynecology, ABOG, the ACOG, and the Society of Maternal and Fetal Medicine. Those are the big three.And it's in the billions. And, like, you see a hockey stick. They got not much funding….And then the hockey stick actually starts just before 2020. Sometimes it starts in 2019. But it's vertical takeoff. And suddenly they're soaking in tens of billions. And the gold standard, as Dr. Thorpe often says, for pregnancy, which... I'm not sure I agree that was the gold standard, but ostensibly the gold standard was no untested substance to be given to any pregnant women ever, ever, ever. No untested substance. And it could be something that people consider harmless: “oh, but that's a cough drop.” It doesn't matter if it's on test.So this was just washed away like those film clips of a tsunami or a typhoon, and it just takes out the whole marina, right? Gone. And these were contracts, let's be clear. Scripts came down. And the contracts demanded that the institutions and that all of the employees browbeat their patients with the script.And this is what's so tragic because the last person a pregnant woman would think might be taking money to gaslight and lie to her would be her OBGYN. That's a trusted relationship. So it really can't get more evil than what they did. It's just breathtaking.And Dr. Thorpe is one of the only doctors who just stood up and essentially screamed bloody murder to what was happening all around him. I don't know the number of how many tens of thousands of OBGYNs there are in the country. Many of them came to him quietly, sub rosa, behind the scenes. He has become the voice for the truth about what happened to pregnant women and their babies.Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Currently I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my dedicated Paypal donation page…: Or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Note that you may need to make a recurring larger recurring annual donation ($100 suggested) not a small monthly one, because SPdonate can’t process anything under $20. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkStripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Currently I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at Paypal…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate where you may need to do a recurring larger recurring annual donation ($100 suggested) not a small monthly one, because SPdonate can’t process anything under $20.Mainstream journalists say crazy things. Most of their madness is banal, consisting of shallow platitudes endorsing GoodThink. But sometimes they one-up themselves, exhibiting a genius for craziness that leads one to wonder: What was that about?!Such a moment came when CBS commentator Margaret Brennan blamed the Holocaust on free speech. JD Vance correctly diagnosed Brennan’s remark as mad. But Freud wasn’t the first to note that genius is to madness near allied. That is, certain symptoms of apparent madness imply rich tapestries of meaning, some or most of which the mad person (or poet or dreamer, according to Freud) does not consciously grasp.Brennan’s brilliantly mad remark was symptomatic of the decadence of today’s pseudo-liberal elite. Many decades ago, back when liberals genuinely believed in liberalism,* it was taken for granted that “the Holocaust” and “free speech” were antagonistic polar opposites. Everyone understood, or professed to understand, that Hitler’s regime had destroyed the moral compass of its society by imposing a one-size-fits-all totalitarianism that brooked no dissent. Martin Niemöller’s famous line about how “first they came for the socialists and I did not speak out because I was not a socialist” summarized the accepted wisdom that the drunk-on-censorship Nazis crushed people’s free expression group-by-group. The implication of Niemöller’s truism was that widespread failure to speak out, and consequent loss of free speech, enabled the horrors of Hitler’s regime, including the war it supposedly caused and the extermination of six million Jews (mostly in gas chambers) that it supposedly perpetrated. In short, the destruction of free speech—not free speech—caused the Holocaust.So what led Brennan to madly flaunt her self-styled liberal identity by expressing the precise opposite of the classical liberal understanding of “the Holocaust” and its relation to free speech? The answer, of course, is that she is afraid of something. “The Holocaust” represents something so fearful she cannot allow herself to think about it, or even to think at all. This thought-stopping magic of “the Holocaust,” the secret to its power, is related to its incomparability. Prior to the rise of the Holocaust religion, in which the Jews replace Jesus, the gas chambers replace the cross, and Israel replaces the resurrection, only God was viewed as incomparable. (The Qur’an sums up its last word on theology as Walam yakun lahu kufuwan ahad, “and there is none like unto Him,” and all other monotheisms agree.) But today it is the one-and-only Holy Holocaust that is held to be incomparable, while all other massacres and genocides, including the one happening now in Palestine, are mere trifles. Indeed, those dare to compare the Holocaust to anything else are accused of blasphemy and heresy. For example, in many countries, those who meet the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism by “drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis” are subject to civil and criminal prosecution and imprisonment. (I hate to even imagine what they’ll do to those of us who think the comparison may be unfair to Nazis!)So the First Commandment of today’s de facto Western state religion is: Don’t even think about the Holocaust! And that explains the subconscious fear that Brennan expressed by absurdly linking the Incomparable Holy Holocaust to free speech. What she is really afraid of is that freedom of speech, a prerequisite for freedom of thought, could lead people to think freely and critically about the Holocaust. Were that to happen, the Holocaust would be reduced from its current status as an official state religion to “just another historical episode to debate and critique.” And once people were allowed to freely debate and critique the Holocaust narrative, instead of being imprisoned for doing so, they might find something so hideously blasphemous, so horrifically sacrilegious, that…that…well, it’s too horrible to even consider! So to prevent people from speaking and thinking freely about the Holocaust, Brennan implies, we need a free speech holocaust. That is, we must burn the Western liberal Enlightenment tradition of free speech to the ground in a kind of sacrificial lynching. (The root meaning of holocaust is “fiery sacrifice.”) Even as Brennan’s Pseudoliberal Party pushes slaughtering free speech on the Holocaust altar and burning it to ashes, JD Vance’s Trumpist Party professes to push back. Indeed, Vance effectively blasphemed against the high priests of G

Rumble link Bitchute linkIsrael has killed almost 100 innocent civilians, committing over 300 ceasefire violations, since the truce went into effect. They lie incessantly about their false-flag bus bombings, "beheaded babies," "babies killed with bare hands"…giving pathological liars a bad name.Transcript of Press TV interview:The Palestinian resistance movement Hamas has named the six Israeli captives due to be released on Saturday. Israel is also expected to release more than 600 Palestinian abductees in return. The exchange is the final one under the first phase of a ceasefire agreement signed just over a month ago. On Thursday, Hamas handed over the remaining two Israeli captives who were killed in Israel's bombings of the Gaza Strip. Israel claimed that the body of one of the captives wasn't actually hers, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threatening to make Hamas pay. The resistance group rejected the threats as a PR stunt. Hamas said it's investigating the Israeli claim, adding that there's the possibility of the bodies due to Israeli airstrikes on the location where the captives were being held. The head of the government media office in Gaza says Israel has violated the ceasefire agreement with Hamas over 350 times. In a statement, Ismail al-Tawwapt has said the Israeli violations included direct shootings at Palestinian civilians and airstrikes by fighter jets and drones. Since the start of the ceasefire agreement, Israel has killed nearly 100 Palestinians and injured hundreds of others. The confirmed death toll from the Israeli genocide in Gaza has surpassed 48,300 people, mostly women and children. Israel has been hampering the entry of humanitarian aid, including shelters and medical necessities, even after the ceasefire agreement. Well, joining us now from Morocco, we have editor of Veterans Today, Mr. Kevin Barrett. Mr. Barrett, first of all, share with us your views on the constant violation of the ceasefire by the Israeli regime, which has come to be known as a common practice by the Israelis.Yeah, Israel's notorious for this kind of lawless behavior. And the reason they get away with it is the skewed media coverage in the West. The media are dominated by the sympathizers, co-religionists and co-ethnicists of the state of Israel, who are loyal to the state of Israel, in many cases more loyal than they are to their own countries. They dominate the media of Western nations and give cover to the Zionists as they violate the ceasefire hundreds of times with impunity, while the Western media reports headlines on “Hamas may have returned the wrong body,” or “buses are blowing up in Tel Aviv,” empty buses blowing up in parking lots in Tel Aviv. Obviously, there being no Palestinian faction that would have any motivation to do anything like that, the only people that would have any motivation for blowing up empty buses and parking lots in Tel Aviv would be Netanyahu and the extremists in his cabinet who want excuses to continue the massacre, the genocide, and to continue violating the ceasefire. And then the Western media just dutifully reports this stuff as if that somehow Israel is experiencing terrorism, when Israel is blowing up its own empty buses in the parking lot as a blatant, transparent, false flag publicity stunt.You know, I'm really tired of the Western media being complicit for genocide. And if we ever have real war crimes trials, the owners and operators of the Western media need to be put on trial for their lives, for broadcasting non-stop genocide propaganda.And Mr. Barrett, if I'm correct, tomorrow marks the final stage of the first phase of the ceasefire agreement. After that, it's scheduled to have medical necessities, humanitarian aid, shelters, to be allowed in to Gaza. What is being allowed in right now has been described as just a drop in the ocean of what the Gazans need. Do you think that the Israelis will also not be holding up there under the bargain when the time comes for the allowing of humanitarian aid to come into Gaza?Well, even in the first phase, they were supposed to allow humanitarian aid in, and they did not meet their commitments. And their failure to allow the trucks in that they were supposed to allow in was the reason why Hamas briefly talked about delaying the release of some of the captives. And then, of course, once again, the Western media covered for the Zionist genocide perpetrators by not reporting honestly what was going on.And so we can't trust the Zionists to keep their end of the bargain. There are those in the Zionist entity who want to flee forward into a wider and bigger war and a bigger genocide. And indeed, they've moved their genocide from Gaza, where to some extent they're still perpetrating it, but they've moved the focus to the West Bank now. And the extremist faction there, which unfortunately is not marginalized—it's central to the power structure in occupied Palestine—they want more. They don't want to abide by the ceasefire. An

Rumble link Bitchute linkSalim Mansur discusses his new article: “What Is the Essential Requirement for a Peacemaker? Remove the beam out of one’s eye, as Jesus commands.” In it he notes: “The Ukraine war will end sooner than later, if not it will greatly impede Trump’s ‘Make America Great Again’ domestic agenda. But this is not the case with the Gaza genocide of Palestinians by Israelis and, consequently, there is no end on the horizon for the conflict in West Asia.”Salim Mansur is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Toronto. He has published many books and academic articles, as well as numerous op-eds in several of Canada’s leading mainstream newspapers.Excerpt from the interview:Your latest piece on what is the essential requirement for a peacemaker—remove the beam out of one's eye as Jesus commands—went to the heart of the issue a lot of people are talking about with Trump. Is he going to make peace, which is possibly what it looks like in Ukraine, or is he going to preside over World War III in West Asia as he hands everything on a silver platter to Netanyahu and his messianic, millenarian, lunatic cabinet? That's the big question, isn't it?It's a very big question, Kevin. But it not only depends on Netanyahu and the Zionists in Israel, the Israeli extremists, fascists, whatever we want to call them, which is appropriate. But it also greatly depends upon that 80 million Christian Zionists in America. I think they have got the American Republic, whatever remains of it, by the throat. And that is what is entrapping Trump.…Ever since Truman—the only exception being John Kennedy,who was as a result assassinated,murdered—all the presidents and the Congress have been bought by the Israeli lobby. And this is the burden that the American people are saddled with. But will they awake? Are they ready to awake? That's the question.(Read the whole transcript at https://KevinBarrett.substack.com )Stripe debanked me so I can no longer get paid through Substack. The workarounds are SPdonate and Paypal . A recurring $10 or more monthly donation via Paypal, or $100 or more recurring annual donation via SPdonate, will help keep this Substack operating. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkAustralian author and conspiracy researcher Peter Myers discusses his new book "Holocaust Reparations and the Gaza Genocide: Does One Holocaust Justify Another?" He argues that Netanyahu enabled the October 7th 2023 Al-Aqsa Storm operation in order to trigger a pre-planned genocide, and that Holocaust reparations to Jews should end and instead be given to Palestinians. Myers writes: “Germany is still paying Holocaust Reparations. Israel has committed its own genocide of Palestinians, but they receive no Reparations.The issue is not money, but the claim of Holocaust Uniqueness. If the Nazi Holocaust is unique, no other genocide is comparable, and Israel cannot be held accountable. Does one Holocaust justify another? To stop the 2-state solution, which the Palestinian Authority favoured, Netanyahu built up the Hamas terrorists and allowed them to receive millions of dollars in cash payments. He was aware of Hamas' attack plan for October 7, he let it happen, and he stood down the IDF, to create consensus for destroying Gaza and ethnic-cleansing the territories. His settler allies want to expel Palestinians, annex their lands, and build the Third Temple on the site of Al Aqsa mosque. After that, their Messiah would rule the world. The West should list them as 'terrorist', as it lists Hamas. Extremists on all sides should be marginalised. The Balfour Declaration, a contract between Britain and Jewry, provided for 'a Jewish home' but not a 'Jewish State.' This book proposes a Hybrid Millet system as a solution to the MidEast Crisis.”Excerpt from the Interview:Peter Myers: Well, even with the IDF, the New York Times published an article that Israel had the Hamas attack plan a year ahead of the event. That attack plan didn't give the date of the attack. But there were intelligence warnings only a few months before the attack that it was coming. And the night before the attack, the IDF and Shin Bet had two meetings. One meeting was about midnight and one was about 3 a.m.So they knew it was coming, but they didn't warn the Nova Festival. And they could have very easily told them to cancel a festival, but they didn't. Now, this was on a holiday weekend in the Jewish religion. And a lot of IDF troops were on holiday leave. Others had been transferred to the West Bank. There were several articles in the Israeli media that said about 100 were transferred to the West Bank. But Seymour Hersh said about 1,600 were transferred. And it left only a very small number, 800 troops for the whole West Bank, for the whole Gaza wall, defending the Gaza wall.And the head of Egypt intelligence rang Netanyahu. This was reported in Israeli media. Ten days before October 7th, the intelligence minister rang Netanyahu personally and warned him. And Netanyahu showed no interest and later denied getting the call.And there were some IDF people called spotters who were women, who about 15, I think of them, or maybe there were 20. But anyway, they used to get images from balloons, which could see throughout the Hamas territory right over to the oceans. And they were reporting Hamas training exercises, very obvious exercises, in the weeks before the attack. And they were told, you send these warnings and then helicopters will come. But they didn't come.And there were a number of reports that the IDF units in the South were stood down for seven hours that day. And there were a number of reports that the IDF units in the South were stood down for seven hours that day. And so there were a number of articles which say, where was the IDF? So a number of IDF people had been transferred. Others were on holiday leave. I mean, they already knew that this attack was coming. So you wouldn't give your soldiers holiday leave at that time, nor would you transfer units to the West Bank, which were much less risky. They had the Hamas attack plan. They didn't have anything similar for the West Bank.What they were doing was weakening the idea deliberately to allow a chaotic situation to occur And the whole purpose of that was to panic Israelis into committing a genocide, destroying Gaza. That was the plan. I mean, it's not as if it was micromanaged. There were a lot of things that happened that day that hadn't been planned. But given that you had, on the one hand, an idea of stand down—most of their helicopters were not available at that point, that morning. Only two were ready and they were in Haifa in the north. And there were none locally. And a few others got ready after a while and then others during the day. And by the end of the day, it's reported there were 28, the full 28 were operating. But there was a stand down.So tanks came from the Egyptian border. Helicopters came from Haifa. So they came from some distance away. They took time. But the local IDF was sort of in a chaotic situation. Instead of defending other Israelis, they were just trying to survive themselves when they were attacked. This is a public episode. If you would

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News linkA few days ago, US Vice President JD Vance made a pilgrimage to Dachau, apostatized from Christianity and embraced Holocaustianity—the new official religion of the West in which the Jews have replaced Jesus, the gas chambers have replaced the cross, and Israel has replaced the Resurrection. To climax his conversion, Vance prostrated himself before the holy imaginary gas chambers and uttered the sacred litany: “Never again!”According to the exoteric doctrine of Holocaustianity, never again means never again a genocide. But even as Vance was intoning “never again,” the government Vance represents was perpetrating genocide—a real and indubitable one this time. And Vance’s boss Trump was blessing that genocide with boastful threats to nuke what remains of Gaza, expel the survivors, and build casinos on the bones of Palestinian women and children.So what does “never again” really mean, then? The true, esoteric meaning seems to be: Never again will anyone significant in the West arise to challenge Jewish power, or even have the temerity to notice it. If JD Vance had cojones, he would have put it this way:“NEVER AGAIN will I allow the Jews to drag me to their infernal holohoax theme park and force me to bow down and kiss kosher tush!”Now that the livestreamed genocide of Gaza has changed everything, it won’t be long before people start saying things like:“Never again will we believe in Jewish victimhood.”“Never again will we allow ourselves to be duped by Jewish Power.”“Never again will we vote for anyone who tolerates the continued existence of the Genocidal Zionist Entity (GZE, pronounced jeeeeez!)”“Never again will we allow week-old babies to be circumcised and traumatized into a lifetime of tribal psychopathy.”“Never again will we believe the victors’ history they taught us in school.”“Never again will we take the Holocaust story on faith.”“Never again will we tolerate the persecution of people who don’t take it on faith.”“Never again will we fall for a Jewish propaganda operation like 9/11.”And above all:“NEVER AGAIN…Will a HOLOHOAX Trigger a REAL GENOCIDE!”Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. So I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at Paypal or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. (Note that you need to do a recurring larger recurring ANNUAL donation not a small monthly one, because SPdonate can’t process anything under $20. For smaller recurring donations use Paypal.) This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkChristians reacted to last week’s interview with Laurent Guyénot by disagreeing with Guyénot’s assertion that the Old Testament is very bad scripture, that Yahweh is basically Satan, and that Jesus never claimed to be the Messiah. Patrick Chenal, a Catholic listener, and Ed Kendrick, a spiritual seeker and pioneer of the “Israel did it” school of the 9/11 truth movement, continue the discussion.ExcerptEd Kendrick: I'm kind of a Heinz 57 as far as religious experience, starting with Southern Baptists, moving into Mary Baker Eddy's Christian Science as my mother had cancer. We were trying to seek a cure through spirituality. Then moving on to Unity, that's in Lee's Summit, the Unity School of Christianity. And then moving into meditation, Buddhism, Baha'i, Scientology eventually for a year and a half, and I went legal against Scientology to get out. That's an interesting story but we don't need to go there right now. Where I'm at right now is I'm at a bit of variance to contemporary Christians in the context of the I am references. “I am the way, the truth, and the life.” Moses at the burning bush, the burning bush suggested he tell his people that I am sent him. And Jesus met on this road by a stranger, replied to the stranger, I am that I am.The concept being something I encountered about 50 years ago, a pastor named Rocco Errico, who grew up in Mesopotamia, and he's a biblical scholar. And he comes from the Essene standpoint of the definition of I am as a central viewer, the watcher, the witness that we all have in Hindu traditions. It would be what we acknowledge when you say namaste to someone and that you acknowledge that core self that you see in the other in front of you that we all share.I'm quite uncomfortable with taking things on belief, which by definition requires no evidence. And I'm quite an advocate for things that we can mutually verify, not because of a majority rule or the loudest voice, but things that we can verify when we start talking about epistemology and the relationship of science and spirituality.Kevin Barrett: Those are two very different perspectives. And they're different from mine, and they're different from Lauren Guyenot’s. We've got a diversity of viewpoints here. Patrick, in a way, your viewpoint, the traditional Catholic viewpoint, is in some ways closer to sort of the long-term Western consensus. There's a doctrine. There are some things that are taken on faith, but there are mechanisms for empirically verifying things. In the first hour, I was just talking about miracles with Eric Wahlberg, And the Catholic Church is well known for doing very extensive investigations of reports of paranormal phenomena that might be accepted as miracles and as evidence for somebody's sainthood. So there is a tradition of empirical research in certain respects in Catholicism, as well as a whole doctrinal approach to what's really going on. And some of that does require faith.So Patrick, what's your take on sort of the relationship between faith and investigation, skepticism, looking for evidence?Patrick Chenal: Well, I would point out that the word faith in Hebrew means understanding. And if you understand something, then you know that it's true. And if you know it's true, then you have hope in something, which is trust. And then love comes after that, and that would be mercy. You were talking about miracles. I'd say one of the greatest miracles in history in regard to Catholicism would be the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead. And recently I read the Gospel of Mark, of Jesus meeting the two followers that were on the road to Emmaus, where he appeared and broke bread with them…When we regard Catholicism, we have the Eucharist, which is the body and blood of Christ in the form of bread and wine, which is the heart of Catholic worship. We go on Sunday to church and we participate in that.Now, when Jesus met these two on the road to Emmaus, he mentioned to them that he was the one prophesied from the time of Moses and throughout the Old Testament. So, that right there gives evidence against the Marcionite claim that Jesus had nothing to do with the God of the Old Testament, which is quite a stretch. And I think a lot of that comes from people who are trying to justify their behavior. And a lot of times they do it to justify their bad behavior so that they can revert to the old way and say, well, God is just this revengeful, almost like demon-like figure that takes revenge and kills entire peoples, like the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, when God saw that they were so evil that he wiped them out.It's quite a shock to people today, that sort of thing. Why would God do that? It really begs the question that most people who aren't of the faith have, that if God is so good, if God is totally good, then why does he allow evil to occur? And I think this kind of involves sort of magical thinking in a way because it's like saying that God is God and that he doesn't hav

Rumble link Bitchute linkLast week's interview with Laurent Guyénot stimulated much discussion and controversy. Some listeners wanted to hear more on miracles and what Islam says about them, while others insisted that Guyénot's critique of Christianity is misguided.Canadian Muslim author Eric Walberg and I discuss miracles. Walberg discussed anomalous events in general, and miracles in particular, in his review of Jeffrey Kripal's How to think impossibly about souls, UFOs, time, belief, and everything else. Since my doctoral dissertation compares medieval Moroccan miracle stories to contemporary personal experience narratives of anomalous events, I've thought about this topic quite a bit, which is why I didn't want to go off on such a huge tangent during last week's conversation with Laurent Guyénot. So today's the day for the tangent.Guyénot suggested that Islam is less concerned with miracles, and more compatible with secular rationalism, than Christianity and Judaism. Though he isn't entirely wrong, it's actually a lot more complicated than that. Tune in for the details.Excerpt addressing Guyénot’s question about Islam and miraclesKevin Barrett: Laurent Guyénot raised the issue of how religious schools of thought (specifically Islam) think about miracles. In Christianity we know that they are considered religiously significant. When an alleged miracle or a story of a miracle comes to the attention of the church authorities, and they think it might be religiously significant, they investigate it. And it can end up becoming a proof of somebody's sainthood. They believe that miracles are related to whether or not somebody deserves to be canonized as a saint.And in Islam, there's a parallel process with saints' miracles, which are called karamat al-awliya. But there's no institutional bureaucracy that decides whether or not this particular story is legitimate and whether it's a real karama or miracle. So the two types of religiously significant miracles in Islam are the saints' miracles, the karamat al-awliya, and then secondly, the mujiza.The mujiza is a miracle of the prophets that God sends as proof of the prophet's mission. In Islam it's widely accepted that the prophet Muhammad peace upon him, the last and seal of the prophets, brought as his main miracle the message itself: the Qur’an. There are stories of other miraculous events around him, but they're all secondary to the main miracle of the message.So those are the two religiously significant kinds of miracles: the mujiza, the miracle or proof of a prophethood—and that would include all of Jesus' miracles that we discussed, as well as Moses parting the Red Sea, etc.—and then there are the karamat, the saints’ miracles. But then what do you do with all of these other things you're talking about Eric like levitation? Some guy posts a video of himself levitating. How would muslims or christians think about that?In Islam, it’s generally accepted that there are these kinds of events that may not have the religious significance of a prophet's miracle, a mujizah, or a saint's miracle, a karama. And probably the term that gets used the most often is the khariq al-ada خارق العادة which it means the shredding of habit or habituality. So the idea is that nature has what some scientists think of as laws, but they're not laws. That's just a metaphor. A law is when the government says you have to do this or else. But the the regularities in nature, which are often mathematical, are simply habits. That is, generally, when you let go of something, it falls to the ground. It doesn't just float up into the air. And usually when you lie down on your bed, you stay pressed into the mattress. You don't slowly rise up off the mattress. That's very rare. So if that happens, is it violating a law? No, there's no law. No government told you had to get stuck to the mattress. It's simply something that's inhabitual.Now, this goes right in line with Hume's critique of causality, where Hume—and then Bishop Berkeley pushed it even further—said that there's no such thing as a cause. There's simply stuff that happens after other stuff happens. So if every time you lie on the bed, you press yourself into the mattress, it's not caused by gravity. There's no cause. It's just that you've observed that every time you ever lay down on the bed, you've gone into the mattress. So it's happened 100 times. The 101st time, you happen to float up into the air. That's an exception to the rule. And in the Islamic view that's a shredding of habituality. So the normal habitual action, or what we expect—that habit is suddenly broken. And something very inhabitable happens, to the extent it's so extreme that habituality is shredded like a veil that's shredded, revealing some deeper reality underneath.So that's the term that gets applied in general to all such paranormal type events. And it's widely accepted in most parts of the Islamic world traditionally that these types of things do happen. And the

Rumble link Bitchute linkIf you live in the West, noticing and pointing out who rules over you can get you censored, deplatformed, bankrupted, fined, or even sent to prison. Fortunately China, now arguably the world’s most powerful country, offers free speech on that particular topic. Hua Bin, a new contributor to the Unz Review, takes advantage by discussing the Jewish stranglehold on the West in relation to his recent articles “The West Is a Demeritocracy” and “US Reeking of the Smell of Fear.”Transcript selection:Kevin Barrett: There is a Karl Rove quote to Ron Suskind, I believe it was, after 9/11. And Rove went on this rant saying that, “all of you in the reality-based community are still stuck in that…We're an empire and we create our own reality now.”Hua Bin: Exactly. I must have seen that three dozen times in various books. Essentially this is the imperialist speaking, right? They create the reality and everybody else lives in the reality that they create. And eventually they reach that point where they don't live in a world of facts, physical laws. Like somehow physical laws are suspended on the date of 9/11, right? Buildings collapsing for no good reason and the laws of physics doesn't apply to airplanes and things of this nature. I like to think those guys actually are sometimes very honest about what they're doing. And frankly, it's out there, right? All the information you need is out there. Very few people actually bother to connect the dots. If you connect the dots, the conclusion is so transparent. It's so just right staring at you in your face, right?To your point, Karl Rove is essentially kind of opening the book to you. How many people really think through what he said and what's the implications? Especially in the context of what happened with 9/11. The so-called war on terror, was just like such a straightforward case of “so who benefits from that terrorist attack? Did the so-called extremist Muslims benefit from that? Or did the state of Israel benefit from that?”So go back to your common sense logic and think about those defining moments in history. And you say, like, we're living in a world that's kind of in the movie of Matrix, right? You can decide to take the blue pill, as most people did, right? And say, “I just pretend I'm living this normal life, not living in the body of the Matrix.” If you take the red pill, it's actually pretty easy to see through all that.To what extent do you think that this (Western decadence, demeritocracy, etc.) is symptomatic of not just a decline in virtue in Western leadership circles per se, but specifically a decline in virtue corresponding with the rise of Jewish power in the West? We certainly see that the Jewish tradition behind the creation of the so-called Jewish state in occupied Palestine is genocidal and mendacious. I translated a book by Laurent Guyernot called From Yahweh to Zion, which makes the case that the roots of that kind of psychopathic lack of ethics go back to the Torah, the holy book, which has influenced this whole Jewish tradition.And so we see that for sure in the colony in Palestine. But there are those who argue that it's also a factor in the Ukraine war and and in the general bad leadership that we're seeing in the West, the propaganda bubble that you talked about in your demeritocracy article.And another quotation regarding that that I want to mention to you, or I did earlier before the show, was Alan Hart, the former BBC lead correspondent for the Middle East, claimed that a very high-level Israeli, who may have been Golda Meir, told him that “our problem is that we believe our own propaganda.” Everybody believes their own propaganda but (here again) Jews are “just like everybody else only more so” as the saying goes. And in this case in terms of believing their own propaganda they really excel at that. We have an unbroken tradition of this tribe whose holidays are all the same: “they tried to kill us, we won, let’s eat.” So for thousands of years their story is that these evil other tribes hated them and wanted to kill them for no particular reason. And so the heroic Jews then fought those tribes and genocided them, like with Purim in the book of Esther. They won. And so, hey, it's a story of success. And then that goes right on into modern times, where we have “the Russians fought us with all their pogroms and so on. There were six million Jews killed in the Russian pogroms. But then we won. There was the Bolshevek revolution. And then the Nazis tried to kill us in the gas chambers, and we won.” And all of these stories are about probably about equally reliable. That is, the details of the Purim story are probably just about as reliable as the details of the gas chamber story or any of these stories.But not only do ordinary Jewish people mostly believe these stories, or pretend to at least on their Jewish holidays in some cases, but they've seized tremendous power and have now inflicted these kinds of stories, especia

Rumble link Bitchute link“Israel,” a euphemism for the genocide of Palestine, is deliberately sabotaging the ceasefire in hopes of resuming its genocide of Gaza. Netanyahu is brazenly violating the terms of the ceasefire. According to The New York Times’ Israeli sources, Israel has failed to keep its promises, including sending hundreds of thousands of tents into Gaza. (It’s winter there, and Palestinian women and children are dying of starvation and exposure.)Hamas, which Israeli officials admit has complied perfectly with the ceasefire agreement, has responded to Israel’s violations by saying that it will delay further hostage releases until Israel stops violating the agreement. Meanwhile, the Jewish-dominated Western mainstream media is lying outrageously by accepting Netanyahu’s framing the situation as “Hamas threatens to break the agreement by not releasing hostages.”The proverb “the Jew cries out as he strikes you” is inadequate in the face of this kind of genocidal mendacity. (“We Jews are the victims! The evil goys won’t release our hostages! They’re the ones violating the ceasefire! Now we must righteously exterminate them! Those women and children are Amalek! They’re just animals!”) Since Jewish billionaires own the West, starting with its politicians and media, it’s all but illegal to state the obvious: All of this lying genocidal mania is quintessentially Jewish. The Torah is the most racist, genocidal book in the history of the world, and the tribe formed by it is the most racist, genocidal tribe ever to disgrace the face of the Earth. The proverb “never make a deal a Jew” may not be as witty as “the Jew cries out as he strikes you,” but it does offer sound advice that the Palestinians should have taken long ago. By engaging in the Oslo peace process in good faith, the Palestinians and their regional supporters naively set themselves up for the accelerated genocide they’re now experiencing. The Oslo Accords were never worth the paper they were printed on, because the Jewish State, formed by centuries of demonic Torah-Talmud programming, is psychopathic. And you can’t make a deal with a psychopath.Now the Resistance faces yet another quintessentially Jewish betrayal of an agreement that was supposed to stop a genocide. Clearly the tribe whose ethics or lack thereof were formed by the Torah-Talmud is supremely non-agreement-capable, and has been for millennia, as the Russians have long known. The only way to deal with them is to make sure they never, ever get the upper hand. And if by some supreme misfortune they do get the upper hand, as they have in the West during the past few centuries, you need to make “getting it back” your top priority…maybe your only priority.During our argument on his radio show yesterday, Richie Allen was offended when I blurted out that the collapsing ceasefire and resuming genocide reinforces the “never make a deal with a Jew” stereotype. I responded that I’m tired of belaboring the obvious point that “not all Jews” are Zionists, or non-agreement-capable, or genocidal, or whatever. There are plenty of wonderful people who’ve been born into Jewish families, and I’ve been privileged to know dozens of them. I’ve even known a couple of converts to Judaism who were good folks. But the Jewish collective, the tribe, harbors a pernicious racist, genocidal ideology and is given to pathological lying at a level that beggars belief. Anti-genocide fighters are at war with “the Jews” in the same way that anti-Nazis were at war with “the Nazis” and anti-Communists were at war with “the Communists” (even though many if not most Nazis and Communists were nice people and often even interpreted their doctrines in a relatively benign way). That’s my take, anyway. It definitely isn’t Richie Allen’s. So what’s yours?Transcript begins:That's The Hollies, or was The Hollies, and long, cool woman in a black dress. This is The Richie Allen Show, live from the heart of the great city of Salford. I'm Richie Allen, and Kevin Barrett is standing by. Kevin, welcome back. Kevin is an academic, he's a broadcaster writer, and a great friend of the programmes. Kevin, I just want to say a quick hello to you, and I'm going to read part of a statement by the Israeli Prime Minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, if you don't mind. How are you, by the way?I'm doing okay, but having Netanyahu say hello to me instead of Richie Allen is actually kind of a weird way to start the conversation.It would be nice, wouldn't it? It actually would be nice, but these people are never going to speak to us, Kevin. Netanyahu has just given a statement to the press in Israel. It's been picked up by Reuters and every other news agency. He said, I'm going to paraphrase this very quickly. “I've concluded a four-hour discussion at the political security cabinet, outraged at the three hostages and their condition last Saturday, yada, yada. We welcome Trump's demand for the release of our hostages by noon on Saturday and welcome his revo

Rumble link Bitchute linkHistorian Laurent Guyénot, author of From Yahweh to Zion, returns to discuss his two most recent articles, “The Disraeli Enigma” and “The Cursed Nation and the Temple of Satan.” On a related note, see my argument with Jonas Alexis, who negatively reviewed From Yahweh to Zion in the new issue of Culture Wars.Excerpts from the transcript:Laurent Guyenot: I'm not fighting against Christianity and I'm definitely not fighting against Jesus. I feel Jesus is an incredibly inspiring heroic figure. “Jesus is a Palestinian.” We need Jesus. I'm not trying to deny the importance of Jesus as a central figure in our civilization.But my priority now became to understand Israel. And I became convinced that you cannot understand modern Israel if you don't understand that modern Israel is the same as ancient Israel. And that's a big disagreement with Christians (who say) “modern Israel has nothing to do with the people of ancient Israel, who were holy people. Yes, they wanted to genocide the Amalekites, but that's because the Amalekites were really, really, really bad.” I'm fed up with these kinds of things. I feel Netanyahu wants to genocide the Amalekites exactly as Moses wanted to genocide the Amalekites. And I feel it's really way too late now to start to defend ancient Israel. Ancient Israel is just as demonic as modern Israel. And if you don't come to the point of realizing this, you just cannot understand what Israel is. You think “it's because they're Zionists, they're not real Jews in any way, they're Ashkenazi Jews.” And you find all kinds of excuses to protect the essence of Israel.The essence of Israel is in the Bible, is in the Torah. I don't especially want to burn the Torah, but I want to put it in a museum or in a library together with Homer and this kind of thing. It's an interesting book, but I definitely don't want anything to do with it as the story of God choosing the Jews. I don't believe God chose the Jews. If I talk to Christians, I want to help them to find a way to get out of this dilemma.And one way, I suggest to them is (to ask): Did Jesus really claim to be the Messiah? Because it doesn't really matter. You say, well, there's the true Messiah or the military Messiah. In any case, if Jesus said, yes, I am the Messiah, that means he stands within the paradigm of the chosen people. Because if God sends the Messiah, that means He needs the holy people and so on. From the historical perspective, that of historians of Jesus, it's debatable. because there is this, notion of the messianic secret. Sometimes Jesus sounded like he said, yes, I'm the Messiah, but don't say it, don't tell it to anyone—which of course, from the historian's point of view, means that he didn't say “I'm the Messiah.” It's the disciples who said he was the Messiah after he died. It's very simple ogic that leads us to conclude that, in fact, Jesus rejected the title of Messiah.So we can say we can basically become Marcionist. That's why I offer to the Christian the only way you can get out and start to save Christianity. Because if you continue to worship ancient Israel, you are worshipping the Devil. If you think Yahweh is God, you are confusing God with the Devil. So the only way you can get out of this catastrophic situation is to understand that Jesus is not the Messiah. Jesus is a guy who is like Socrates, a guy who is completely 100% loyal to the truth, to what he saw as true, to the point of sacrificing his life.In a few days, we will have the anniversary of the self-immolation of Aaron Bushnell. I was thinking about this today. I felt I have to write something.Jesus was like that. He could not stand to see this evil society. He spoke out or — he's not like Aaron Bushnell, but the impulse to be totally, 100%, in harmony with what you believe, you know, and going all the way: That's what Jesus was. So he was destroyed. He is precisely the saint, the patron saint, of people like you and me. Or at least we should try to imitate him in the sense of fighting against Israel to the point of being ready to pay the price.Jesus, by the way, was crucified not by the Jews, but by the empire. They use the empire to destroy their enemy.So I get carried away. But what I wanted to say fundamentally is that I feel it's wrong to defend ancient Israel. It's wrong to excuse Moses for having to kill the Amalekites. Now, everybody can see what is Israel. So you have no excuse any more. And we hear Netanyahu say “the Gaza people are Amalek.” We have no more excuses for the Torah. We have to go to the root of the problem. The root of the problem is the Torah.Kevin Barrett: There is an alternative between orthodox Christianity, which embraces the so-called Old Testament or Torah as an inerrant holy book—at least traditional Christians do that—and the Marcionite position, which is basically your position, which is that the God of the Old Testament is the Devil.And that third position alternative is the one that I, of course,

Rumble link Bitchute linkNote: I am debanked here at Substack so I need my Substack subscribers to support my work here by making a recurring donation at Paypal or better yet SPdonate. Note that if you use the free speech payment processor SPdonate you may need to make a larger annual recurring donation rather than a smaller monthly one. $20 is their minimum for any kind of donation. So…thank you to the patrons who are making this work possible! -KB Alan Sabrosky USMC, “most censored man in America,” returns for his “first Friday of the month” commentary. Trump’s chaotic first month in general, and his ultra-Zionist lunacy in particular, are on the agenda.Dr. Alan Sabrosky is the former Head of Strategic Studies at the US Army War College. He expresses his Jewish heritage via cuisine, not foreign policy.Transcript begins:Welcome to the live edition of Truth Jihad Radio. I'm Kevin Barrett doing this show every Friday, bringing on interesting folks with a lot to say, some of them kind of notorious, greatly-admired and in-some-quarters-reviled people bringing up provocative ideas that they don't want you to hear. Tonight we have two classic guests here reappearing on the show. In the second hour, Laurent Guyenot, the author of From Yahweh to Zion, comes on to discuss his two recently published articles, “The Disraeli Enigma” and “The Cursed Nation and the Temple of Satan.” In the latter article, he addresses the issue of whether eighth-day circumcision is a major factor in making Jews crazy and genocidal. So that'll be a transgressive hour.And then in the first hour, more transgression with Alan Sabrosky, who expresses his Jewish heritage through cuisine, not foreign policy, is coming back on the show for his usual first Friday of the month gig. He wants to talk about ongoing scandalous issues around Trump's chaotic first month in office. And in particular, the Zionist craziness, the ultra Zionist craziness, this madness of Zion, genocidal madness: “slaughter the children and build a Riviera on their bones.” Chances of that happening are somewhere between slim and none. Hey, Alan! You're looking good. How are you doing? Not so well in some ways, but I'll talk about that later.Sorry to hear that. Actually, I've got some issues going here, too, but I probably won't talk about that later. I'll talk about the world issues…It is a little discouraging to lose almost $8,000 to Stripe, canceling 80% of my income and then stealing the $8,000 that they owe me, $7,800, whatever it was. And so that totally demonetized the Substack, which is my main job.Wow, I didn't know that. I didn't know that would happen.Yeah, I think it's kind of a compliment, because not that many people have actually gotten debanked at Substack by way of Stripe. So I guess I could take that as a badge of honor. But it's also a pain.You said that to me after one of our programs, six, seven years ago, where we were talking, and I mentioned the H word, and suddenly my mic was cut off.Yeah, it's funny how that happened.You said something to me about, “you should take that as a compliment.” I thought, it's not exactly a compliment to realize that you're gone, you know. But that happens.You're back.Yeah, we know. And what is so fascinating to me, and I don't mean that in a positive sense, is that these folks are so good at destroying things and people and ruining things and people. And so bad at building good things. It's not a question of build back better, the old slogan that the Biden administration had. They can't build back, period, better or worse. But by God, they can tear down. Well, that's what Trump has in mind. Trump lets the Israelis do the genocidal demolition, and then the Americans are going to come in and build the new Riviera. Where does this guy come up with this stuff? Is he smoking something, or is Bibi somehow ventriloquating him?That's a very good question. Two things about Trump 2.0 are very interesting. And they both bear on your comment. One is that Trump 2.0 is making a serious effort to avoid the fatal error he made in his first term of not getting control of the interior ministries of the government—the Justice Department, FBI. Whether I like him or dislike him doesn't matter. He is doing his best to get control of the government. And it's one of the oddities that has struck me about the American system: It used to be even as recently as 35, 40 years ago, that most confirmations of political appointees or of three and four star generals or force commanders or heads of the services were pretty much pro forma. About the only one that people paid real attention to, and that was often very controversial, was appointments to the Supreme Court.But now we're in a position, unlike under a parliamentary system, where a president is elected or selected, whichever you choose, because of a certain platform that that president puts out. And then our system allows the opposition party to grind that president's nominees, political appointmen

Rumble link Bitchute linkGlobalization Studies professor (emeritus) Anthony Hall of the Looking Out at the World From Canada Substack explores a range of viewpoints on Trump's threats to invade and annex Canada, and provides historical context.Transcript selection:Welcome to the Truth Jihad podcast. I'm Kevin Barrett doing this in audio since 2006 bringing you thoughts from folks around the world who are thinking outside the proverbial box, but a little bit better than Trump is with his lunatic real estate schemes. So I'm back right now with an old friend and colleague, Dr. Anthony Hall. Welcome, Tony. How's looking out at the world from Canada?Oh, it's a really cold and snowy today. It's a classic Canadian winter day here in Southern Alberta, where I can see the mountains of Montana off on the horizon.Sounds beautiful. It was a cold day by Morocco standards today, but not cold enough to keep me from running on the beach and swimming in the Mediterranean. But don't be too jealous. You've got a great country, and maybe you can fight off Trump and keep it. So Trump is saying he wants to invade Greenland and Canada and genocide Gaza. He wants to own the genocide instead of making Bibi own the genocide. Is this man insane? Does Canada have to worry?Well, Trump has been talking about Canada as the 51st state. And that gets us thinking. That's a pretty radical thing to say.It's a big state.And what about having 10 states? Or what about one province joining and the others not? There's all kinds of possible combinations here. I'm now on the third article I've written about it. I find that some thoughtful people in Canada are saying we should join the United States and would like to join the United States and make some compelling arguments.If we did join the United States, my suggestion for Netanyahu and Trump would be that Trump make Israel, the area controlled by Israel, the 52nd state and annex the whole thing like he wants to do with Canada or is thinking of doing with Canada, including the Palestinians. They can have the oil and he can make Israel the 52nd state of the USA. All people would be citizens of the United States on an equal basis.But with this situation in Canada—much of United States is on the land of Canada. In Wisconsin, when you were in Wisconsin, you saw that all the names around you, many of them, were Aboriginal and French. New France was deep into what is now the United States. And Trump seems to have no awareness of the history we share. And that history, of course, is much older than the United States. Canada has a number of incarnations. Canada didn't start in 1867. The name Canada came out in the early 1500s from Jacques Cartier. And sometimes New France was known as Canada. And Canada has been, you know, Upper Canada, Lower Canada, the United Province of the Canada.My sense is people imagine that the United States is sort of the model and Canada is just a paler United States. And I think a lot of Canadians probably look at that as because people don't know a lot of history. So I started by thinking I would tell some Canadian history to explain some of the phenomena unfolding now.Like this isn't the first time the United States has shown interest in annexing Canada. There was a plan to invade Canada in the 1930s in the era of Franklin Roosevelt. And it was on the books and taken seriously. The idea was to absorb Canada.Alaska was created in 1867 as a prelude to ingesting Canada. And now we're seeing a repeat.Maybe Canada should invade Alaska, get some help from Putin.Well, for myself, I would like to be allied with Russia rather than NATO. And I think Canada would be a good partner, a good ally of Russia.Well, there you go. That's a great idea. You guys, together, could definitely take Alaska. But you're going to make Putin line up his submarines with those torpedoes that create 800-foot radioactive tidal waves and get those guys all set up and aimed at the two U.S.-American coastlines. And then it's a done deal. Alaska will drop right into your lap.Jean Chrétien, a former Canadian Liberal party prime minister, who refused to go into Iraq and join the coalition of the willing in 2003, called Trump's words “unprecedented threats and unacceptable insults.” And that's a pretty serious language coming from a former head of state to a current head of state.You know, the hard news is, it's about Israel all along. It's Israel first. He doesn't have that much time from here on. And if he wants to do anything like the plan he laid out yesterday, that's what his administration is all about. So why not have Israel as part of the United States?Well, let me just say, Tony, that Palestine is the capital of the Islamic nation, which is the real nation. This Morocco I'm in, and every other Muslim-majority country, are just imaginary little provinces. The real nation I live in is the Islamic nation, and Palestine is our capital, and we are going to get it back, and the Jews are just going to have to deal

International law professor Francis Boyle passed away last Thursday, January 30. I will miss his pugnacious, fiery outrage at the palpable injustices and absurdities that metastasized during his lifetime and killed the American Republic and whatever ideals it may once have represented. In 2013 Boyle prosecuted Israel for genocide before the Kuala Lumpur Tribunals. In early 2020 he forcefully argued that COVID-19 was obviously a bioweapon, and participated in webinar I helped organize along with Ron Unz, Meryl Nass, and others. (Boyle, like yours truly, was fingered as a “COVID conspiracy theory super-spreader” by the Zio-NATO front group Atlantic Council.) Then in mid-2022 Boyle appeared on my radio show promoting his book arguing that COVID vaccine mandates violated the Nuremburg Code. In short, Francis Boyle was on the right side, or the mostly-right side, of several of the biggest issues that most academicians shy away from. And none of those issues were bigger than 9/11. National Medal of Science winner Lynn Margulis said more than once that science ended on September 11, 2001. At the end of this short interview, Boyle says something similar about the rule of law.May God bless Francis Boyle and shower him with His mercy.-KBTranscript from Dec. 26 2018 InterviewKevin Barrett: Francis Boyle is an international law professor at the University of Illinois. And he's also a great human rights voice. He has been trying to shame the University of Chicago into dissociating itself from Gina Haspel, the torture queen. Let's talk a little bit about why they should do that. Francis, I take it you're not proud to be an alumnus of the same institution as Gina Haspel.Francis Boyle: Thanks, Kevin. Let me... Straighten the record out. I was not trying to shame the University of Illinois at Chicago because they're shameless. The merger between the University of Illinois at Chicago and John Marshall Law School had to be approved by the American Bar Association, which is the accrediting agency. And last February, the culprits at the University of Illinois in Chicago signed on to become a CIA signature university, which is appalling.I grew up in Chicago. I remember Mayor Dick Daley put University of Illinois at Chicago there. And, we can criticize Daley all you want, but he came from a working class background and he wanted to have an affordable public education in the city of Chicago for working class kids like he was. Necause at that point in time, all the colleges in Chicago were private and cost a lot of money. So it's done great things for educating the youth of Chicago, working class youth, youth of color, et cetera.So last February, the administration up there decided to become a CIA signature university, so that the CIA could operate freely on campus and recruit these kids to become CIA assets and agents. It's despicable. What exactly is a CIA signature university? They're in cahoots with the CIA. You can have a look at their Web page. They do everything. They give the CIA free access to campus. They can run courses and they can come in and recruit students as agents and assets. They're thoroughly penetrated now by the CIA.Just to clarify, is this a program that other universities have as well, an official program called being a CIA signature university?That's correct. And the University of Illinois at Chicago administrators there who should be fired did this knowing full well that bloody Gina Haspel was the acting director and going to be the director of the CIA. And that was all over the news media and it made no difference to them. So, you know, this is completely unethical and reprehensible. Well, there was nothing I could do about that, but the University of Illinois and Chicago wanted to acquire John Marshall law school, which is in downtown Chicago. I know John Marshall quite well. My dad was a lawyer and put me to work downtown there at the age of nine at the clerk at his law firm. And actually, I always had a high opinion of John Marshall. And indeed, the last time the University of Illinois at Chicago and John Marshall talked about a merger, I was asked by two different people up there if I would be willing to transfer my tenure to John Marshall Law School as part of the University of Illinois, which I agreed to do because they have a public interest orientation. And they are also there, again, to provide legal education to poor minorities, et cetera. Basically, anyone who wants to become a lawyer can go there and see if they can make it. So I did.And what happened this time is the University of Illinois at Chicago, a CIA signature university, then is going to give the CIA and bloody Gina Haspel their own law school. So when I found that out, I launched a campaign to convince the American Bar Association not to approve the the merger, which they had to approve.And the ABA…I've been a member there since 1977, when I was first licensed to practice law. And their motto is American Bar Association, defending li

Rumble link Bitchute linkBishop Richard Williamson, a courageous man of faith, passed away on January 29 at the age of 84. He was best-known for the persecution he suffered after made headlines in 2009 for his remarks in an interview with a Swedish television channel: “I believe the gas chambers did not exist,” he stated “I think 200,000 to 300,000 Jews died in Nazi concentration camps, but not in that way (...). I do not believe six million Jews were gassed.”By opposing the false religion of Holocaustianity—the unofficial state religion of the Western empire—Bishop Williamson was subjected to various indignities by the modern-day Inquisition.I was lucky enough to have had several conversations with Bishop Williamson. The audio file above and write-up below is from our August 6, 2017 interview, while the video is from November 2023. -Kevin BarrettWrite-up for 2017 interviewBishop Richard Williamson is one of the world’s most notable traditional Catholics. Formerly a leading disciple of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), he is now allied with SSPX Resistance, which aims to uphold the original principles of Archbishop Lefebvre while resisting the “liberal reforms” of the Second Vatican Council. He is now officially outside of the Church as represented by the current leadership in the Vatican. But some say it is Bishop Williamson and his colleagues who are within Catholicism as it has been understood for most of its almost 2,000-year history. As Bishop Williamson says, citing Archbishop Lefebvre, “the truth is still exactly the same Catholic truth. It cannot change!”In this interview, Bishop Williamson discusses the path that led him to his current position. He asserts that the modern world’s authorities, including the contemporary Vatican, are disciples of the French Revolution, freemasonry, and moral relativism…trends whose ultimate source is satanic. (For more on the sources of this “contamination,” see my interview with Michael Hoffman.)We also touch on the “sacred” Holocaust and 9/11 narratives, both of which play a foundational role in conditioning populations to accept the rule of the satanic/demonic. (Bishop Williamson’s problems with the official Catholic authorities stem in part from his challenging such official narratives; he is on record saying that 9/11 was an inside joband that the Holocaust is a false religion based on a grossly inflated death toll and false tales of hydrogen cyanide gas chambers – claims that led to his being fined $16,822 by a German court.)The interview also contains a fair bit of interfaith dialogue. I note that the traditional Catholic worldview, as summarized by Bishop Williamson, is almost identical to the Islamic one. The major exception, as the Bishop forcefully notes, is the Catholic belief in the holy trinity, which Islam rejects.Excerpt:Kevin Barrett: When we're trying to speak the truth about empirical issues, whether it's gas chambers or 9-11 or what have you, it does seem that the authorities don't really mind having a chaotic situation where there are people trying to speak some of these suppressed truths, people like us, as long as it just contributes to the chaos. But if we try to say, this is where you're lying, there is a truth here, the whole culture rejects that.Bishop Richard Williamson: Exactly. Exactly. The whole culture rejects that precisely because the Freemasons are in control. And they hate dogma. They cannot tolerate dogma. So that attitude, that position, the destruction and undermining and dissolution of objective truth, has penetrated inside the Catholic Church. And the Catholic Church is melting like ice in the sunshine. If you subject a dogmatic institution to the dissolving of objective truth, there's very soon not going to be much left of that dogmatic institution. And when you say that today's authorities don't mind what people think, you're right. But a state or a country, a nation in which everybody is free to think two and two are five, and which many people do think two and two are five, or they at least think that two and two can be five, that state is in dead trouble. And that's why the whole modern world today is in dead trouble, because it's forgotten, it's refused objective truth. It's refusing the object.Now, a number of subjectivists are in good faith. They've learned subjectivism. In other words, there's no objective truth. Two and two can be five. That's what they've learned from their school. That's what they've learned at their university. That's what they've learned in church. That's what they've learned from their parents. A number of poor souls today are wandering around with total confusion in their minds because they've never known any better.On the other hand, there are a few people who know perfectly well that there's an object of truth, and they are fighting it tooth and nail, because their motivation is to dissolve all truth and make the confusion such that all souls finish up for eterni

Rumble link Bitchute linkOri Goldberg, an Israeli Middle Eastern Studies scholar with a focus on Iran, got my attention with his eloquent protests against the Gaza genocide. I emailed him, opening with “Your country may have lost its humanity but I’m glad you haven’t.” Below is a transcript of the beginning of our conversation.Kevin Barrett: Welcome to Truth Jihad Audiovisual. I'm Kevin Barrett, looking all over the world for people with something important to say that the mainstream isn't attending to. I've been doing that now for, what, two decades plus. And now I am going to Israel, of all places, to talk to Ori Goldberg. I've been looking for an Israeli I can relate to. And most of the Israelis I can relate to have left—people like Gilad Atzmon and Miko Peled. But Ori is still there, and I've been following his X/tweets for a week or so. And they are really eloquent and beautiful. And so I saw his background is actually similar to mine, former academician and Middle East Studies PhD. And we both are kind of disgusted with our own countries and outside of academia now. So I found somebody I can relate to. Hey, welcome, Ori. It's good to have you.Ori Goldberg: It's just great to be here, Kevin. It's very kind of you to think of me and thank you for all those kind words. Yeah, I know just as well as you do that good conversation is often hard to find and these days much, much more difficult than it was a while ago. So I'm very, very grateful for the opportunity.Well, I'm grateful for what you've been saying. People can get arrested these days for saying uncomplimentary things about the genocidal Zionist entity. Even just that phrase, maybe it'll get me stopped at the next European airport I go through. And there you are in the belly of the beast, putting out this very, very eloquent…you're not pulling any punches.Thank you but in a sense it's easier for me than it might be for you because in the belly of the beast, as you say, I am not even a negligible minority. Of course there are people in Israel who think like me and write and talk and try to protest and do all sorts of things, but we really have absolutely no popular sway. And in that sense, it's better to let us spout off than to arrest us, especially since we're Jewish, right? If I was a Palestinian, I would most likely have already been arrested. Because I'm Jewish, I serve two purposes. I let it be seen that Israel is capable of hearing criticism and dealing with it, not having a tantrum when faced with criticism from Israelis. And also, I demonstrate the resilience of Israeli democracy. We've got freedom of speech here. Anybody can say whatever they want. And it's a cost-benefit analysis, ultimately. I was actually told this by organs of state security that they don't care. They read me. They know what I'm saying. They don't care. They're all for my right to express myself freely.So it’s easier for me than it is for somebody in Germany, for example, or maybe even in the United States or Australia. Nobody pays any attention to me in Israel. I tweet in English, but that's not the reason. The reason is that... I don't think most of the stuff that I and people like me are saying is something Israelis are capable of even hearing, let alone processing.I can relate to what you're saying. My background is that I was teaching Intro to Islam etc.—I'd finished my Phd in 2004 Just as I was finishing that I discovered problems with the official account of 9/11. And I started investigating that and writing about it. And the hammer came down in 2006. And I was dragged on to Fox News and CNN, and I spent six months having my 15 minutes of fame as a 9/11 dissident in the United States. And that was a similar situation (to Israel today) in that for a while after 9/11, there was this mass hysteria and very few Americans were speaking out critically. But by the time I was attacked by the media in 2006, it had gotten bigger.So anyway, I ended up becoming sort of a professional dissident after that because I could no longer teach in the West. And whenever I lectured in Muslim countries—Turkey and Malaysia and Morocco and Iran and so on—the first thing that people would always ask me, was: How can they let you say this stuff? If what you're saying is true, how could they possibly let you talk? And then I explained that I actually talked to former members of state security in the United States who told me things like, hey, that article you just wrote, Kevin, was so good that as many people as it takes would be killed to prevent that article from showing up in The New York Times. But because you're publishing it over here (in alternative media) it actually doesn't matter that much. And the cost-benefit calculation is to let you say it.These are efficient operations and they know the principles of knowledge control—let's call it that—very effectively. They wrote the book and they know what they're doing and they are very much aware of risks, which is why I can say pretty

Rumble link Bitchute link FFWN linkStripe deplatformed me. Here are the workarounds: Spotfund Paypal NEW go-to free speech system SPDonateOn December 10, 1896, a new king seized the throne in Paris: King Ubu. It happened during the one and only public performance of Alfred Jarry’s play Ubu Roi, which begins with a bloodcurdling scream “sheeeeee-it!” and only gets more vulgar from there. When Trump was first elected president in 2016, quite a few commentators noticed that Trump is an American Ubu. As Charles Simic explained in the New York Review of Books:The only character I can think of in the world literature who resembles Donald Trump is Père Ubu in the play Ubu Roi (“Ubu the King”) by Alfred Jarry that famously opened and closed in Paris on December 10, 1896, after starting a riot. A parody of Shakespeare’s Macbeth and now a classic of the theater of the absurd and the forerunner of the Dada and Surrealism movements, the play is a depiction of the lust for power, full of insolent nonsense and violent horseplay. Père Ubu is a buffoonish pretender to the throne of Poland, a brutal and greedy megalomaniac who, after killing off the royal family, starts murdering his own population in order to rob them of their money. One audience member at the premiere of the play, the Irish poet William Butler Yeats, was aghast at what he had witnessed and reputedly said afterward: “What more is possible? After us, the Savage God.”That’s how elites are reacting to Trump’s chaotic restoration: “What more is possible? After us, the Savage God.” But the commoners are cheering. They like Trump’s “deport ‘em all” rhetoric, his trashing of DEI and gender-bending, his withdrawal from the WHO and banning gain-of-function research, his threatening political enemies with retribution (including revoking Secret Service protection for Pompeo and Bolton), his releasing assassination records, banning censorship and saving TikTok, pardoning the J-6 protestors and abortion protestors, banning Central Bank Digital Currencies…and above all, promising to restore economic prosperity for working people….though the details, involving invasions of Greenland and Canada and Panama, trade wars and tariffs against the whole world, and ending restrictions on drilling for oil and gas, more tax cuts for the rich, even more lavish and wasteful military spending, and so on, are questionable.Though Trump’s gangsterish threats to Pompeo and Bolton are both entertaining and defensible, his genocide-endorsing call to “clean out” Gaza of its human population is Ubu-esque in the bad sense. Trump’s incitement to genocide, which in a civilized world would trigger his summary execution, is presumably related to Kosher Nostra son-in-law Kushner’s plan to develop the ‘very valuable’ potential of Gaza’s ‘waterfront property’ and make billions of dollars for ubu-rich Jewish genocidal gangsters like himself.Was Alfred Jarry an Antisemite?It is of course a well-known antisemitic trope that rich Jews are excruciatingly vulgar and greedy beyond belief.* If they weren’t robbing us blind, robbing the Palestinians even blinder (not to mention deader), committing an in-your-face genocide while mendaciously inverting their own racist history of despising and persecuting and dispossessing goyim, and generally crying out while they strike you—putting Western peoples, Middle Eastern peoples, and planet Earth in extreme jeopardy—we would all be rolling on the ground laughing at their Ubu-esque psychopathy.Which raises the question: Since Ubu seems in many respects a quintessential Jew, was Jarry’s play a satirical depiction of the Jewish conquest of power in the West? In other words, was Jarry an antisemite? Should he be reported to the ADL so his works can be banned and his name first smeared, then forgotten, as has happened to most of the other great Western thinkers and creators who noticed the rise of Père Jewbu?Since I don’t have Jonathan Greenblatt on speed-dial, I called on the next best thing, ChatGPT, to find out whether Jarry was an antisemite. The AI Oracle, which is hilariously wrong about almost everything,** told me:There is no definitive, concrete evidence that Jarry was an antisemite in the same overt or systematic way that some of his contemporaries, like Charles Maurras, were. However, there are aspects of his life and works that have raised concerns about his attitude toward Jews…Have you come across any specific examples of his work or writings that made you wonder about this?I pointed out: “When Ubu Roi was written, the ‘vulgar, greedy Jew’ was a common antisemitic trope.”ChatGPT answered:You're absolutely right to point out that Ubu Roi contains elements that, through a modern lens, could be seen as reflecting harmful stereotypes, including the "vulgar, greedy Jew" trope. Pere Ubu, the central character, is depicted as a grotesque, corrupt, and power-hungry figure, which in the context of early 20th-century Europe, could be interpreted as a kind of parody or

Rumble link Bitchute linkNASA whistleblower Richard Cook critiques Alexander Dugin on Trump’s revolution and notes Blinken/Biden’s blood-soaked legacy.Transcript extract:I spend a lot of time in the hinterlands. The flyover zone, you might say. I have very strong ties and contacts in Texas. And the angerthat has been building, particularly in the last four years with the Biden administration, and all that has happened in the United States with the woke culture, this anger is very palpable. And there are tens of millions of ordinary people in the United States whose sense of betrayal and disgust with the Democratic Party and its woke culture finally burst.And it's not only that. I am very much in favor of the initial actions to close the border, to begin the deportations, and to declare the drug gangs terrorist organizations. That has been a long time coming as well. I have close contacts in the Department of Homeland Security. One of the lead people that I've talked to actually was down on the Texas border watching the Mexican Army escort drug gangs across the border. This is a very real phenomenon that has been corrupting American life now for quite a long time.I also have spent a good bit of time in Montana the last few years. And you go on to an Indian reservation and you talk to people and you read the accounts of what's been going on out there, that they have been subject to an invasion of Mexican drug gangs. Some of these people drive in from California, chiefly, or in some cases, Washington State. They are picked up by the police with carloads of fentanyl and loaded guns that they then unload on the Indian reservations. And I even told somebody who was questioning me about this, “why don't you and I go out there and we'll go to a morgue and we'll see how many of the bodies in the morgue are of Indians who've died of fentanyl overdoses. And then we'll go to a federal district court where these drug gangs are on trial and we'll see what names they go by and we'll see what they bring in and then we'll see the prison sentences they get.” And if you do that and actually talk to the real people on the ground in this country, you realize the disaster that's been unfolding here for so long.And quite honestly, the news about Ukraine, even the news about Israel, is kind of far away to the people who elected Trump. And what I have said is that Trump is riding a populist wave. Who knows what the guy really believes about a lot of things. You witness his impromptu press conference in the Oval Office, where he says “I think Spain is in BRICS, isn't it?” And you begin to question, who's this guy talking to?Well, that's the S, right?Where is he getting his information? So it's a complex situation. But I have written in one of my publications, the e-book I published with Global Research. The title is World War III is on and America Has Lost Already. The American Civil War has begun. And the only salvation for humanity is spiritual. But the Civil War is on. And the Civil War very much follows the pattern of the Republicans and the Democrats as we saw them back in 1860, with Trump playing the Lincoln role and Biden playing whatever role he played. Biden, Harris, whoever they are.But the battle lines are the same, and what Trump is doing is he's recreating the American system that the Republicans were trying to create in 1860, and that the Republican presidents continued to create throughout most of the 19th century. And it's no accident that Trump has shown himself to be a big fan of William McKinley, because William McKinley was the last great Republican president, the last Republican president who believed in the American system, the American economic system. And a cornerstone of the American system was tariffs. The McKinley tariff, which actually was passed not when McKinley was president, but when he was in Congress before that, was the cornerstone of American economic policy all the way up to the start of the 20th century. And so it's no accident that Trump somewhere has in his entourage a speech writer who knows about William McKinley.Didn't the banksters assassinate McKinley?Yeah, they did. It was another one of these lone gunman things. And the guy who took over from McKinley was Theodore Roosevelt. Theodore Roosevelt was a British fifth columnist at the head of our government. The LaRouchies have documented this pretty well, and I have too in my book, Our Country Then and Now. And it was Theodore Roosevelt who opened the floodgates to the money trust and the Rothschild takeover of the banking system in America and produced the Federal Reserve system of 1913.And so what Trump is doing is he's hearkening back to the pre-Federal Reserve days. He's criticizing the interest rates of the Federal Reserve. He wants the Federal Reserve rates to come down because as everybody knows, that's the only way you're gonna get economic growth in the United States. The high interest rates that were installed by the Federal Reser

Rumble link Bitchute linkStripe deplatformed me. Here are the workarounds: Spotfund Paypal NEW go-to free speech system SPDonateTranscript of Press TV interviewMr. Barrett, it's great to have you with us. What message do you think the Al Ghassan Brigades, the military wing of Hamas, are sending by releasing this recent footage? And also, what does this show about the effectiveness of the Palestinian resistance?This is yet another indication that the Israeli genocidal war on Gaza was a complete abysmal failure, especially from a military perspective. The announced goal of the Israelis was to completely eliminate Hamas and to free all of their captives through military action. And that, of course, was a pipe dream from the very beginning. But their failure to accomplish that was absolutely spectacular. And we saw from these videos that when the Zionists pulled out from Gaza as this ceasefire deal comes into effect: they backed off under fire, under very heavy fire.And that right up until these last moments that the Islamic resistance movement in Gaza is a formidable military presence there. So this has just underlined what we saw throughout this entire period, this 15-month genocide. The Israelis were very much capable of randomly murdering women and children, but they were utterly ineffective in confronting their military peers, the Hamas forces that overran them on October 7th and humiliated them in several stand up battles at military centers close to Gaza. That was what Scott Ritter memorably called the greatest military raid of the century.That military defeat of Israel on October 7th has been followed by a much longer period of military defeats. And of course not it's not just that the Israeli military is ineffective in this kind of fighting. Maybe they're too cowardly to go into the tunnels and risk their lives in great numbers. And maybe they just don't have the the wherewithal or the stamina for this kind of difficult fighting. But I think the real fault on the Israeli side goes straight up to the leadership, that is, to Netanyahu, who got into this situation for political reasons, pursued a genocide for political reasons, set objectives that couldn't possibly be realized for political reasons.And now it's all blown up in his face and blown up in the face of the Zionist entity. And this is a crushing defeat, a historic defeat that will be viewed in retrospect as a landmark in the liberation of Palestine.Mr. Barrett, you just mentioned the issue of war crimes being committed by the Israeli regime there. What steps, in your opinion, must be taken to prosecute the Israeli war criminals in international courts? In other words, how can the issue of accountability begin to take shape?We're living in a new world now where accountability through international law is going to be…perhaps not what it should be, but it's going to be more possible. It's a real possibility in ways that it wasn't in the past. And there are two reasons for that.One is that the United States Empire, which has always insisted on impunity for itself and its so-called allies… though Israel is not a U.S. ally, because it will not officially declare its borders because it wants to keep stealing more territory. For that reason, the US is prevented by law from actually forming an official alliance with Israel. But nonetheless, the Zionists are so powerful in the United States, with Jewish Zionist billionaires owning much of the media, much of the financial system, and most of the politicians, that the Americans can extend this umbrella of impunity over the Israelis. The thing is, though, that the American empire is starting to totter. And we have a president and a new administration now in the United States that explicitly recognizes that the days in which the U.S. could pretend to rule the world through alliances and impose its will on Europe and on Asia and on Africa and so on through this system of alliances and international institutions that were built up after the Cold War, is now falling apart. And indeed, the US war on Russia through Ukraine is also a war on Western Europe. And Western Europe is starting to wake up to this after its economy has been devastated because the US has plundered Europe by essentially cutting off industrial Europe and Germany from Russian gas, and selling Europe extremely overpriced American gas in its place. So the United States is plundering the world. And now it's nakedly out for itself with this Trump administration. And these alliances are gonna break down. That means that Europe will prosecute Zionist war criminals in the future because it won't be intimidated by the United States. And the rest of the world will also be more independent in the future. And the whole world is horrified by this genocide. The United States is really the only country with the leadership that's fully behind this genocide. So other countries other than the United States are going to be able to prosecute these war criminals.

Rumble link Bitchute link James Perloff leads off with a discussion of “Donald Trump: Rebranding Globalism as Nationalism.” Then Eric Walberg weighs in on the Hamas victory that has unsettled “Israel.” May the unsettlement be completed soon.Transcript excerpt:James Perloff: You and I did a show about Trump’s cabinet. We looked at the fact that every person in a key strategic person was a Zionist, pro-Israel, anti-Iran, pro-war, and that is in perfect alignment with his first administration. And we talked about the things he did in that administration. But regarding Trump's rebranding of globalism as nationalism: Here's what Trump said on Truth Social, and this is this year, January the 6th, 2025. He said, “many people in Canada love being the 51st state. The United States can no longer suffer the massive great deficits and subsidies that Canada needs to stay afloat. Justin Trudeau knew this and resigned.” Actually, I think Trudeau resigned because he knows something really bad is about to happen. But anyway, continue with Trump's quote. He said, “if Canada merged with the U.S., there would be no tariffs, taxes would go way down, and they would be totally secure from the threat of Russian and Chinese ships that are constantly surrounding them together with a great nation it would be!!!”Now, a lot of people dismiss this and they say, well, Trump's not serious about that. He's just talking. But two days later, he had a press conference and at that press conference, he suggested that Greenland should be incorporated in the United States. I've got the links on my web article. His remarks were dismissed again as being facetious. But just two days later, he sent Donald Trump Jr. to Greenland, which kind of underscores the seriousness of what he's talking about.Kevin Barrett: Yeah, if he sent two or three armed bodyguards alongside Donald Trump Jr., he probably could have taken Greenland right there.That's a good one. That's probably true. It wouldn't take a lot to conquer Greenland. But it’s being heralded to Trump followers as MAGA. It's making America great again to absorb these other nations. But I’m a student of the New World Order. My first book came out in 1988, The Shadows of Power: The Study of the Council of Foreign Relations. Those guys are the power brokers or at least until 9-11 they were the main power brokers in America. They were the Rockefeller-Morgan branch of the deep state.In order to write that book, I actually went through every issue of Foreign Affairs, which is their journal, which they began publishing in 1922, the year after they were incorporated. Now, in 1988, there was no internet, as I'm sure your listeners know. And so I had to do everything through hard copy. So I actually sat in the Boston Public Library, and I went through every issue of Foreign Affairs starting in 1922. And what I noticed was that throughout their history, the Council on Foreign Relations, through their mouthpiece Foreign Affairs, was advocating world government, which is what they're all about. They were about the League of Nations and the UN, but they were advocating: “We can't just leap into a world government. We've got to do it gradually. We've got to boil the frog. The way to do that is to establish regional alliances as a stepping stone for world government.It's the North American Union and things like that.Absolutely, we're going to get to that….(read the full transcript at my Substack by clicking on “transcript” above the video image on the right). This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link FFWN linkPSA: I’ve been debanked from Substack, so please try my new 100%-free-speech supporting donation platform! You can even “write” an echeck: https://spdonate.org/qr/DjH0qAs I write this early Sunday afternoon Morocco time, food trucks began rolling into Gaza a little over an hour ago. Al-Jazeera correspondent Hind Khoudary reports from Rafah:You can’t imagine how happy Palestinians are, especially with the fact that they can move freely now. I am in Rafah right now, on one of the main roads connecting Khan Younis to Rafah. The destruction is massive. For the first time since May, when the Israeli army invaded Rafah, Palestinians have the chance to come to their houses. And they’ve come and found it shocking that their houses are reduced to rubble. To the right of me, a man is just sitting on top of his bombed house; another family is trying to clean up and gather whatever’s left of their houses in order to bring back their relatives. They say that they’re going to clean up, remove all of the rocks, see if there are any bombs or shrapnel left, and then bring their families back. This is the atmosphere now; everyone’s going back to their houses and neighbourhoods. I met very young children, one of them told me, “I know my house is bombed, but I just want to see it.”This outcome—the Resistance and Palestinian people enduring, even as Israel failed to achieve its two war aims (obliterating Hamas and freeing all hostages through military means)—was entirely predictable. In fact, I have been predicting it since mid-October 2023. Zionist idiots scoffed and said Hamas would be obliterated and the hostages returned within a few weeks, or a month at most. They kept changing their timeline and story over the 15-month war, while I continued to point out that “Israel” was doomed to suffer a catastrophic defeat due to Netanyahu’s idiotic politically-based decision to fight a war he was sure to lose.Meanwhile, hysterical non-reality-grounded alt-media people whined that Gaza was destroyed forever and would never be rebuilt, that all surviving Gazans would soon be expelled into the Egyptian desert, and that “Israel” would soon turn Gaza into a Club Med for rich Jews. They added that the West Bank would soon be emptied of Palestinians, who would all be murdered with the survivors hounded into Jordan. When I expressed skepticism about the logistics (and geopolitical consequences) of murdering over five million people and expelling the survivors, these folks didn’t have an answer, other than something along the lines of: “The Jews own America, they’re evil, and they can do whatever they want.”No, they can’t. And almost all well-informed American Jews, from liberals to uber-Zionist Thomas Friedman, agree with me that Netanyahu is an idiot who pursued a doomed war plan for purely political reasons. Now it’s all coming unglued. “Israel” will be lucky to hold itself together in the wake of this monumental defeat. The Palestinian people are the heirs to the prophets. Their steadfast resistance to tyranny, even under unimaginably horrific conditions, is a stunning inspiration to everyone who cares about truth and justice. In a world with few heroes, Palestinian heroism bestrides the globe like a new Colossus. The sacrifices they have made, and the victory they are well on the way to winning, will be remembered forever. Epitomizing and embodying good (the new multipolar order) defeating evil (the old Zionist-bankster-run Western empire) the epic liberation of Palestine will likely become the founding myth (meaning “sacred story”) of the multipolar world.The next round of resistance will have even more regional backing, notably from Turkey and Turkish-allied Syria. And the Shia-led Axis of Resistance in Iran, Iraq, Yemen and Lebanon isn’t going away, but will be plotting revenge for however long it takes. Meanwhile the whole world, with the exception of a small number of very powerful lunatics in America, now hates Israel, views it as the new Nazi Germany and Bibi as the new Hitler, and is dedicated to the cause of Palestinian liberation. “Israel” has no more chance of existing in its current form in 2035 than 1980s apartheid South Africa had of persisting into the new millennium.-KB False Flag Weekly News transcript extract:Kevin Barrett: Well, moving on to the genocide news of the week. Is the genocide over? That's our theme. And Israel's cabinet has approved the ceasefire deal. So that's a good sign, provisionally anyway. Well…how provisionally, Wyatt? What do you think?Wyatt Peterson: Well, it's good news. Anytime mass slaughter and destruction ceases, that's good news. Unfortunately, Gaza has been turned to rubble. And so all this talk about them being able to return to their homes…you ask yourself, what homes? God only knows how many people are buried underneath that. But unfortunately, it remains to be seen if this ceasefire is even going to be honored by the Israelis. They have a history of no

Rumble link Bitchute linkSecond hour: Scientist and revisionist historian Germar Rudolf discusses his latest experience of being locked up for voicing and writing his heretical views about World War II history. This time the pretext was a misdemeanor warrant for a minor infraction that, unlike pretty much every misdemeanor warrant ever issued, somehow drew “special attention” that led to Germar’s being extradited across state lines and housed free of charge for over three weeks, all thanks to the generosity of American taxpayers. In this interview he describes a horrible prison experience that made a few days in a Pennsylvania prison more traumatizing than over four years in German prisons.Germar Rudolf, author of The Day Amazon Murdered Free Speech and the new Holocaust Encyclopedia (free online at www.NukeBook.org) offers “an uncensored and unconstrained look at the pertinent evidence that upholds the orthodox Holocaust narrative.” Unlike all mainstream defenses of orthodoxy that I’m aware of, The Holocaust Encyclopedia is a very easy-to-use reference guide to the relevant evidence and sources.Has the Holocaust Encyclopedia surpassed Thomas Dalton’s Debating the Holocaust and Nick Kollerstrom’s Breaking the Spell as the best up-to-date introduction to nuts-and-bolts of the revisionist side of the Holocaust argument? Check it out and see.Transcript begins:Kevin Barrett: Welcome to the second hour of tonight's Truth Jihad podcast. I'm Kevin Barrett doing the show now since 2006, doing a lot of video these days, and bringing on more great guests since I got started with 9/11 Trutt with people like Steven Jones and Richard Gage and those kind of folks back in 2006, 7, 8, 9, 10. And moving on to other issues where we're not being allowed to think freely and figure out what's really going on in the world: It's interesting how many of those issues seem to have something to do with Zionism. Probably a majority of the people who are being witch hunted out of the American academy are being expelled for heresy around Zionism.So why is that? And why is it that so much of the pushback against free speech all over the world is related somehow to Zionism and in particular its founding official myth—the human sacrifice myth of the modern world, the myth of the Holocaust? By myth, I mean sacred story. I'm not necessarily casting aspersions on its factuality. But I do have a guest who's been known to cast aspersions on its factuality, and that is Germar Rudolf. He is the publisher of the Holocaust Encyclopedia, which looks like a fantastic go-to source, one of the most interesting encyclopedias in the world, actually. And definitely one of the most controversial ones. They won't let him sell it on Amazon. It’s an encyclopedia that you can't sell on Amazon because it takes views of history that they don't want taken, whoever “they” are. Maybe you're starting to get a sense of who that is. Anyway, welcome, Gerber Rudolf. Great to have you on.Germar Rudolf: Thank you for having me. The topical issue that led me to want to have you on over the past month is: You were arrested once again. You've been put under lock and key repeatedly because you went after the Holocaust story. And they have been after you ever since.There was a report that, “oh, no, they arrested Governor Rudolf.” This was like a month ago, I think. And so those of us who know your work and stuff behind the scenes, we were saying, “what can we do? Hopefully he'll be out real soon.” I sent a postcard to your jail address. You probably got out before it arrived. Is that right?Yes, I don't know where you send it to. I was 17 days in upstate New York awaiting what they call extradition (to Pennsylvania). I was arrested while driving in upstate New York trying to drive out west to a friend who was having severe health issues and I wanted to help her out. And somehow scanning my license plate, which police cars do nowadays automatically, brought up some old issue that was pending in Pennsylvania. And even though in the past they had refused to do extradition to pursue the case, now something has changed their mind. And this old case was pulled up. And they said, yeah, this time they want to have me. So I was 17 days waiting extradition. And then I was shipped over to York County, southern Pennsylvania, just north of Baltimore. And I was there only for a week. And the mail, if you send it to the processing center for the York prison, which is actually in Maryland, the processing takes quite a while. They open and scan all the mail, make copies of it, and I would actually only receive a photocopy. I don't receive the original. For safety, they don't forward anything original to inmates. I don't know. I have no experience with it. It was the first time for me in the prison system. I don't want to repeat it. So I have no idea how long that takes. But by the time mail arrived, I was probably gone…Read the full transcript at my Substack by clicking “transcript” above the v

Rumble link Bitchute linkPSA: I’ve been debanked from Substack, so please try my new 100%-free-speech supporting donation platform! https://spdonate.org/qr/DjH0qSalim Mansur recently published “Into the Second Year of Israeli Genocide in Gaza: The collective West’s complicity reflects moral bankruptcy, as in that of Canada.” It begins:“Bethlehem has been delivered a mortal wound that now runs through the ancient city where, as both the Gospels of the New Testament Bible and the Qur’an narrate, Virgin Mary brought forth into the world the child Jesus (Yehoshua in Hebrew, and Isa in Arabic). It is the wound that now divides the world in the first quarter of the twentyfirst century, and the beginning of the third millennium, into two unequal parts, the Global North and the Global South. This division is not natural brought about by some feature of geography; it is a division designed and imposed by men of war, plunder and pillage, from the Global North as were once the Crusaders a millennium ago, mortally wounding the township of Jesus’s nativity whose birth symbolized heavenly peace for all people and who later announced, ‘Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God.'”Salim Mansur is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Western Ontario and has published in many of Canada’s biggest newspapers as well as international publications. A severe critic of obscurantism and extremism in the Muslim community, he wound up hanging around with the wrong crowd post-9/11, and even once made a shortlist of “Incredible Muslims that Support Israel.” Since then he has figured out who the world’s most dangerous extremists really are, and probably won’t be making that list again.Note: Upon getting acquainted this week, Salim and I discovered that we share an appreciation of the great Sufi teacher Bawa Muhaiyaddeen. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkPSA: You can’t donate to me through Substack because Stripe debanked me. If you’re a paid Substack subscriber, Stripe will not be taking any more of your money, and you can safely ignore notifications that “your payment didn’t go through.” So if you want to support my work, and be an active member of this community, please donate to my January Spotfund appeal or set up a recurring donation through my Paypal page.Welcome back, everyone. Press TV of rolling coverage here after a Gaza ceasefire has been announced in Doha, Qatar, by the prime minister of Qatar just hours ago, a highly anticipated ceasefire that's to be basically implemented in three different phases involving a complete end to the genocide, the bombing, the indiscriminate bombing and shelling of the besieged Gaza Strip, as well as an initial Israeli troop withdrawal from major cities and ultimately a complete withdrawal aid getting into desperate Gazans, Gazans being allowed to go back to the demolished homes or what's left of them. and aid, desperately needed aid to get into Gaza. And this is supposed to be ended with prisoner exchanges, which are supposed to take place in three different phases. And also in the ultimate phase, we're supposed to see reconstruction begin for Gazans. Now to monitor the ceasefire is going to be the U.S., Egypt, and the Qataris working out of Cairo, the Egyptian capital, to closely monitor that it's implemented by all parties.Joining us is Ahmed Al-Najjar, press-TV correspondent from the southern Gaza city of Khan Yunus to gauge reactions to this announcement of the Gaza ceasefire and see how Gazans are reacting to it. Hello, Ahmed. Congratulations to this victory for Palestinians after 15 months of a nightmare. Tell us what people are saying and how they're celebrating the ceasefire down there in Gaza.-Ahmed Al-Najjar: A couple of hours ago, right behind me here next to Nasser Hospital, the streets were filled with people who came, who have no connection to internet or electricity and came here just to have the recent developments regarding the ceasefire and to their fortune. It was announced the Qatari prime minister and foreign minister announced that it will take place on the upcoming Sunday. Within three days it will go into effect. However, since then, they return to their tents, they return to their makeshift shelter, return to wherever they are displaced as they have been put in a state of disappointment that it didn't start right away, as Israel is pressing ahead with more attacks on the Gaza Strip, reminding them that their happiness, their safety, wasn't even completed yet.We're talking about at least 10 Palestinians who were killed just since the announcement of this ceasefire, just in Gaza City, where the occupation has carried three airstrikes. One of them targeted a residential building for Anabih family within the eastern parts of Gaza City. Another one was a series of fire bursts conducted within area in northern Gaza, and another one that targeted a group of civilians also within Gaza City. Here in Khan Yunis City, at least two airstrikes were committed within the so-called safe zone. One of them targeted a tent in western Khan Yunis. The second one targeted a residential building within Gizan Rishwan area that claimed the lives of at least two Palestinians. The Palestinians are still hoping that this announcement of ceasefire will eventually lead to the ultimate end of this genocide. However, three days is not a short period compared to Israel's capacity of conducting more attacks on civilians and claiming more lives of the Palestinians who all hope that they will be fortunate enough to survive until next Sunday to witness this ending once and for all.-Thank you Ahmed. Joining us also now is Kevin Barrett, author and political expert joining us out of Saidia, Morocco, and Sakina Datou, author, journalist, and producer joining us out of London. Dr. Barrett, always a pleasure to check in with you. Hope you're safe and doing well. Now, we know that the ceasefire may have just been announced, but you heard our correspondent. Palestinians have already been killed since the announcement of the ceasefire a couple hours ago. It's not supposed to take effect until Sunday, January 20th, four days away. It seems like the Israelis want to continue the genocide up to the very last minute. Your initial thoughts on the ceasefire and your level of optimism with respect to it.-Well, it's extremely good news, of course. But it's just so disgusting the way that the Zionists behave. The Palestinian side, once the ceasefire is announced, even though it doesn't take effect until Sunday, they're not going to be going around trying to kill Israeli civilians, children and women. And they're probably not even going to be blowing up Israeli tanks, because they're decent human beings who can get into the spirit of "we're having a ceasefire here, even if it doesn't officially begin until Sunday."But

Rumble link Bitchute linkPSA: You can’t donate to me through Substack because Stripe debanked me. If you’re a paid Substack subscriber, Stripe will not be taking any more of your money, and you can safely ignore notifications that “your payment didn’t go through.” So if you want to support my work, and be an active member of this community, please donate to my January Spotfund appeal or set up a recurring donation through my Paypal page.Donald Trump: Man or Myth? That’s my alternative title for Kenaz Filan‘s article “The Rorschach President:What Do You See When You Look at Donald Trump?” Since Trump is being criminally sentenced today, ten days before his scheduled inauguration, this is a good time to revisit the Trumpian mythos. I emailed Kenaz noting that his piece was “Well-observed and well-written. I would add that self-styled experts in ‘the creation and maintenance of public myth’ like Philip Zelikow (chief architect of the official 9/11 myth) know all this and are manufacturing and manipulating it, most obviously in the case of the blatantly fake ‘magic ear-nick.’” His reply:“I’d be thrilled to be on your podcast and have marked the time off on my calendar.It occurs to me that not only can the Left not Meme, they can’t do myths. The Kamala campaign was built around TikTok buzzwords (“Joy,” “Brat,” “Coconut”) and vapid speeches, while Trump was delivering fiery speeches and creating buzz with “they’re eating the dogs, they’re eating the cats” and “you have to go back.”You can also see this in contemporary American filmmaking. Look at Rings of Power or the latest Star Wars slop for an example. They write by committee and focus group, and sprinkle in lots of nods to The Current Thing, but there’s no magic. That’s because Leftism fears the exceptional and privileges the mediocre.Thanks for having me on and looking forward to speaking with you then!” This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link FFWN linkAt first glance, Jeffrey Sachs and Donald Trump don’t have much in common. Sachs is a highbrow policy advisor who used to make top-100-most-important-people-in-the-world lists, but has lost his Establishment position after trumpeting unspeakable truths. Trump, for his part, is a middlebrow-at-best showman with a genius for mixing unspeakable truths with outrageous nonsense and then selling the intoxicating concoction to right-of-center voters. Despite their very different styles, Sachs and Trump share an interest in unspeakable truths in general—and truths about the 9/11 wars in particular. During his 2016 presidential campaign and afterward, Trump called the 2003 US invasion of Iraq a “disaster” and a “big lie,” while blasting the open-ended pointlessness of the war in Afghanistan. As president, he unsuccessfully pressured his generals to withdraw. Trump has even made a few statements echoing claims of the 9/11 truth movement. During an interview on CNBC's "The Kudlow Report" in 2011 Trump said:“I blame George Bush for 9/11. The CIA failed. The FBI failed. Everybody failed. But, ultimately, the president is the one that’s responsible.”In February 2016 debate Trump also referenced the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center:“The World Trade Center came down during his (Bush’s) watch. I mean, the World Trade Center came down, and he was president. It was a disgraceful situation.” One reason it was “disgraceful,” of course, is that American political and journalistic elites lied outrageously by claiming that jet fuel, rather than explosives, did the catastrophic damage. On the very day of the attacks, Trump went on record opining that explosives must have been used on the Towers.Jeffrey Sachs, like Trump, has repeatedly blasted the disgraceful 9/11 wars and the lies that dragged America into them. Like Trump, Sachs has insinuated that he knows the official story of 9/11 is a lie. In a recent interview Tucker Carlson asked Sachs whether he expects the incoming Trump Administration to release classified documents on 9/11. Foolishly, the at-least-somewhat-9/11-savvy Carlson suggests those documents might merely explain why al-Qaeda did it (which, of course, it didn’t). But Sachs counters by rattling off a long series of “evil” actions by the US government, including assassinations and MK-Ultra mind control, and repeatedly going to war under false pretenses, and says that if the truth ever comes out:“It would change the course of America back to a true republic. Because what happened in this country is that we were overtaken by the security state and we became a system of confidentiality and unaccountability. And it’s a big, massive machine, and a lot of people are paid to keep quiet or to salute whatever the military industrial complex or the intelligence agencies are doing without asking questions. Because when you have one and half trillion dollars a year spent on that, you’re a pretty big business. And it has affected the universities, the think tanks, of course, the Congress, which asks no questions of any serious kind. And so major, major events of fundamental significance for our insecurity take place without any truth-telling at all.”Though Trump and Sachs both express virulent disgust with the mendacious 9/11 wars, and offer nods and winks signaling their knowledge that the 9/11 official story is a big lie, they seemingly differ on who was responsible for those lies. Trump blames Bush and the American Establishment in general—and even neoconservatives. Trump has made a career of saying things like:"The neocons are the people that pushed us into the Iraq War and caused all this trouble in the Middle East. They don’t know what they’re doing."But Trump has never explained precisely who the neocons are or why they wanted to use big lies to trick the United States into going to war in the Middle East. It is well known that neoconservatism is a primarily Jewish intellectual movement, and that its central tenet is loyalty to Israel. But Trump, despite his criticisms of “neocons” and their wars and deceptions, never says that in public. On the contrary, he poses as America’s biggest Israel supporter, and lets his rabidly Zionist Jewish son-in-law, Jared Kushner, run his Middle East policy on behalf of Benjamin Netanyahu.But Trump’s status as a Zionist-owned-and-funded slave of Netanyahu was called into question last week when the president-elect tweeted a short video of Jeffrey Sachs speaking the following words:Why did the US invade Iraq in 2003? First of all, it was on completely phoney pretenses. It wasn’t “Oh we were so wrong, they didn’t have weapons of mass destruction.” They actually did focus groups in 2002 to find out what would sell that war to the American people. Abe Shulksky, if you want to know the name of the PR genius…they did focus groups on the war. They wanted the war all the time. They had to figure out how to sell the war to the American people. The

Rumble link Bitchute linkRon Unz, author of Our COVID-19 Catastrophe, and Jim Haslam, author of COVID-19 Mystery Solved, are leading experts on the COVID origins issue. Unz just published an updated overview of that issue focusing on Haslam’s work. Unz writes: “The central thesis that Haslam set forth can be summarized in just a couple of sentences. Just like all the other lab-leakers, he believed that the Covid virus was bioengineered, but argued that its creation took place in an American lab rather than in Wuhan. According to him, the Chinese virologists who were so heavily demonized in the Western media from 2020 onwards had almost no role in that process and were completely innocent, even being unaware that Covid had been created.”Unz agrees with 90% of Haslam’s work, but disagrees with his lab-leak scenario, which Unz terms “astonishing” (and not in a good way). Instead, Unz points to strong evidence that COVID-19 was released in a deliberate US bio-attack on China and Iran, as the Supreme Leader of Iran and the top Iranian bio-defense general charged and recently-assassinated Gen. Kirilov, head of Russian bio-defense, strongly insinuated.So…are both authors right in arguing that the “China virus” was made in America? And which scenario better explains its release? Tune in and decide. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkSterling Harwood, a philosophy professor and lawyer who wrote a book on the "Paul McCartney was replaced by a look-alike" hypothesis, returns to ponder the "Stephen Hawking was replaced" conspiracy theory. Evidentiary issues include: Just how unlikely is it that Hawking lived 55 years after getting an ALS diagnosis? (MSM admits: "What’s happened to him is just astounding. He’s certainly an outlier.") And why do his teeth look different in earlier vs. later photos? Could it be that Brits just have bad teeth, and it was the teeth that got replaced, not the rest of Hawking? And doesn't he look younger in later photos and older in earlier ones? Does a fair and complete representation of the photographic record show the same person at different ages, or two different people? If it's the same person, does ALS cause Dorian Gray syndrome? Would it be worth $1000 to hire a super-recognizer to arbitrate? What do Hawking's friends, family, colleagues, students, and other biographical sources say? And finally...why is the seminal article about this issue the product of "Miles Mathis," an absurdly fictitious conspiracy-spewing entity that writes like the putrescent product of an illicit liason between Cass Sunstein and the ADL?Read the full transcript by clicking “transcript” above the video image at my Substack. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News linkThe 2024-2025 chronodometer turnover was…portentious, and not in a good way. America’s leading national monuments were struck by lightning on New Year’s Eve, almost as if God were trying to tell us something. Meanwhile, an ominous, officially-unexplained pestilential fog, not unlike the Airborne Toxic Event in White Noise, settled over the land. As the putrid AI-generated nano-fog thickened and HAARP lighting flashed, Jabba the Muslim, previously known as Jabba the Hut before his transition, wreaked Allah’s vengeance on the degenerate revelers of Bourbon Street, New Orleans—while a more nebulously coded arch-villain, a supersoldier whistleblower worried that the Chinese are invading America with UFOs (presumably to extend their chain of intergalactic Egg Foo Young restaurants and force us all to eat with antigravity chopsticks) set his Tesla a-fizzle in front of Trump Tower Las Vegas.What does it all mean? As for the fog, the lighting, and the super-soldier, your guess is as good as mine. But the Jabba the Muslim incident was considerably less mysterious. The transparently false flag nature of that event was underlined when the FBI set up bomb-making chemicals and equipment in the dead suspect’s apartment, opened a Qur’an to verse 9.111, vacated the completely unsecured “crime scene” and allowed a fluent-in-Hebrew New York Post propagandist to waltz around filming “evidence of Islamic terrorism.” Anyone who can’t figure out that this was yet another Israeli-orchestrated anti-Islam PR stunt—like the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, 9/11, the 2002 Bali hotel bombing, the 2004 Madrid train bombings, the 2005 London bombings, the 2008 Mumbai attacks, the 2009 Fort Hood shooting, the 2010 CIA-employed underwear bomber scare, the 2012 Bengazi attack, the 2013 “Lee Rigby beheading,” the 2014 “James Foley beheading,” the 2015 Charlie Hebdo PR stunt, the November 2015 Paris attacks, the 2016 attacks in Brussels, Orlando, and Nice, and the 2017 Manchester Arena “bombing”—needs to read my books. For a concise introduction, check out chapter 5, “Pre- and Post-9/11 False Flags” in my free online book We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo.The return of transparently bogus “Islamic terrorism” augurs ill for the New Year. It suggests that POA, the Party of Antichrist, otherwise known as the Greater Israel Genocide Project or GIGP (pronounced “gig-pee”) is once again running amok after being mostly missing-in-action, at least in terms of anti-Islam false flags, since the mid-to-late 2010s. The upshot: Genocidal Israel is apparently preparing to drag Uncle Sam into another big war against Muslims. That’s presumably why PR assets like Jabba the Muslim and his publicist, Jennie Taer, are being activated.What’s Trump’s role? Most likely POA/GIGP expects him to rubber-stamp expanded war on Iran, annexation of the West Bank, and Yahweh knows what else. Trump’s real “inauguration” was not the upcoming travesty on January 20, but the symbolic coronation of the dying-and-reviving god-king in the obviously fake kayfabe “ear nick” on July 13. So I don’t see the swapping out of one White House dotard for another as anything to celebrate. (Trump’s 78, three years older than Brezhnev when he died, so the gerontocracy isn’t quite dead yet.) But Cat McGuire argues that the end of the Biden era deserves a toast, especially since Trump’s election symbolizes the death of woke. Alright, Cat, let’s argue! Transcript selections Kevin Barrett: Welcome to False Flag Weekly News, the weekly news show that tells the truth, the way too obvious ones that the mainstream doesn't seem to want to face, and even some of the less obvious ones too. I'm Kevin Barrett with Cat McGuire. Hey, welcome back to the show, Cat. Happy 2025.Cat McGuire: Yes, happy 2025 to you, too. It came in with a bang, that's for sure.Well, I don't know if you'd call that Tesla truck blowing up a bang or a fizzle, but it came in with something or other. So here's our slide of the week (posted above). And I know you said you’re not sure this joke is that obvious. So let me explain the joke to everybody. OK, so Jimmy Carter dies right as the year ends and Trump's coming in. And that symbolizes that we had a 150 IQ president who tried to be rational and moral and totally failed. And now we have a guy who's probably two digits at best, maybe one, a walking human zombie. Rational and moral are not words that could even be possibly used. And so there's a certain sense in which Carter to Trump at the turn of this year symbolizes what's happened to America.I think I did understand that. I think it was more I was hoping that wasn't it.You disagree.Yes. Trump is the zombie psychopath? After four years of the Biden zombie psychopaths who have been utterly incompetent? At least with Trump...I'm not like a big Trump fan, but at least we have some rationality back. It may not be Carter's moralism, but at least they're rational. They're 100 times better than

Rumble link Bitchute linkAlan Sabrosky returns for his first Friday of the month gig. Speaking of gigs…was regime change in Syria engineered by the Greater Israel Genocide Project (GIGP, pronounced gig-pee)? Other questions to ponder: Will the incoming Trump Administration be an improvement? Was Jimmy Carter’s America, like Carter himself, relatively rational and moral, compared to today’s USA and its genocidal Zionist-owned soon-to-be-inaugurated reality-show clown-in-chief? Will things keep getting worse in 2025, and if so, how fast?Dr. Alan Sabrosky is the former Head of Strategic Studies at the US Army War College. He expresses his Jewish heritage via cuisine, not foreign policy.Kevin Barrett: It’s a crazy new year. We just had this twin terrorist attack with vehicles deal where two trucks caused mayhem, one serious mayhem in New Orleans, and then a Tesla truck or something like that just sort of exploded or flamed out in front of the Trump Hotel in Nevada. And then the weird thing is that after this ramming attack, by a supposed ISIS supporter—yeah, right—in New Orleans, Rita Katz's evil twin was allowed to tour the guy's apartment. And she's going through there with her camera like, “oh, my God, he's got a Koran. And look, a keffiyah.. He's got a keffiyah! He was a Muslim.” Alan Sabrosky: More than that, more than that, he was from, he'd been at Fort Bragg.Well, they were both at Fort Bragg, apparently. Just coincidentally, by the way. Have you been there?Oh, yeah. Long, long time ago. To Smoke Bomb Hill. That's sort of a slang for it. The 82nd Airborne Division was based there. Special Forces was also based and trained there. That was what they called Smoke Bomb Hill, which is where they went through special warfare, PSYOPs and a couple of other things. And I went through the PSYOPs course. But yeah, it's there. And it's intriguing because, it has connotations within the military as being the home of the Green Berets, which were the special force before the Special Operations Command and SEALs and all of that came around later. But the military would know about that. The thing of it is…Why?(To read the full transcript at my Substack, click on the “transcript” button above the video image on the right.) This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkZafar Bangash of Crescent International, author of Power Manifestations of the Sirah, notes that Syria has become Zionist-occupied territory after Assad’s ouster, and worries that “the genocide of Palestinians may look like a garden tea party compared to what they will do in Syria.” So how should the Islamic movement respond? Citing the Prophet’sﷺ example after the Battle of Badr, he seconds Mohamed Ousman’s argument that sometimes the best defense is a good offense. Extract:Kevin Barrett: Welcome to Truth Jihad Audio Visual. I'm Kevin Barrett doing a combination of prerecords and live broadcasts. This is a prerecord, and I am touching base with one of my main references, both in terms of what justice is all about in the Islamic religion, and also how that is reflected in today's world history and current events. Zafar Bangash is the author of Power Manifestations of the Sirah. He's written about leadership in islam and he has a new article out at his Substack, which I highly recommend, and that is called The Islamic Resistance and What Is to Be Done: The Islamic Movement Perspective. And he points out that maybe the Islamic movement needs to get a little bit more on the offensive, a little bit more unpredictable. Maybe we're being a little bit too nice, a little bit too reasonable. Maybe we need to step outside the expectations of the opposition and find better ways to respond to these ridiculous attacks that are coming at us from every direction. So let's get into it. Welcome, Zafar. As-salamu alaykum. Good to have you.Waalaikumsalam, Kevin. It's wonderful to be with you, and I look forward to this discussion.Likewise. I appreciate the great work you do at Crescent International, where I also write. And I thought this latest piece was really interesting, though not very specific about... precisely what the Islamic movement needs to do to push back against...well, the main problem right now, obviously, is the Zionist genocide and the Greater Israel Project. But that's tied into the larger Western imperial movement to take over the planet. Tell us a little bit about the article and your take on these current events.Bismillahirrahmanirrahim. First of all, we need to understand that as far as the Islamic movement is concerned, it must derive its methodology from the sirah of the Prophet. He is the one who demonstrated to us as Muslims how the message of the Quran is to be implemented in our lives, what we are supposed to do, how we are supposed to do it. And in the article that you made reference to by Muhammad Usman, one of our writers, and of course that's our approach as well, he points out to a particular episode in the Prophet's life. That was the Battle of Uhud. Muslims probably would be familiar with what took place, but for your other viewers or listeners, let me say that that battle took place just outside Medina in the third year of the Prophet's migration from Mecca to Medina. Now, initially, the Muslims, only 700 of them—they had set out with 1000, but 300 broke away from them. Those were, of course, the hypocrites who were not sincere to the Muslim cause. They broke away. And there was a 3000-strong Meccan army facing the Muslims. And they came face to face in a place called Ohud.In Medina, there is a mountain, the Mount of Ohud. And there was a slope where the Prophet appointed or installed archers on that hill and told them that you are not to abandon your positions regardless of what happens on the battlefield, because those archers were supposed to protect Muslims from the rear so that the Meccan cavalry could not come from behind the Muslims to attack them from the rear as they were facing the Meccan army.Initially the Muslims were successful. Only 700 of them were facing a 3000-strong army. But because Muslims were very committed, they were able to overpower and drive off the mushriks, the Meccan army. And as the Meccan army started to flee, Muslims started to collect war booty. And these 50 archers that were stationed on the hill, saw that the Mushriks were running away and Muslims were gathering war booties.So 40 of the 50 archers that were stationed there abandoned their positions. The others pleaded with them not to leave their position because the Prophet had instructed them not to do so. And yet they just abandoned their positions, thereby exposing the Muslims to an attack from behind by the Meccan cavalry.And unfortunately, a total victory was turned into a major defeat. More than 70 Muslims were martyred in that battle. It was a major setback. The Prophet himself was badly wounded. And then the Muslims took refuge by climbing up a hill, and the Makkan army under the command of Abu Sufyan left.Now, of course, Muslims suffered grievous losses. They also were wounded, and yet the Prophet did not take a defensive position. He realized that the Meccan army, when they left the battlefield, would realize that they did not finish the job, so they might come back aft

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News linkExcerpt:Kevin Barrett: Here’s our Happy New Year message. Let's make it a happier year than the last crappy year. And then the big question is, will it be another year of genocide? Jonathan Cook is appalled as all of these massively pro-Zionist human rights groups, these totally Western-controlled human rights groups—even they have to admit that this is just total obscene genocide. Mike, is this ever going to end?E. Michael Jones: Why are we starting on a note like this? We've been doing this for over a year now. It's really upsetting. Because we're calling basically the fundamental values of humanity into question here. This is what the Israeli genocide is doing. Is there a fundamental basis that we share under God which means that He is the creator and he created laws by which we are to operate, which most people know as the Ten Commandments. Does that apply to the entire human race? Or is there a Jewish exception? Can the Jews do anything they want? Can they kill you if they don't like what you say?In countries like the United States, it turns into other types of warfare, like deplatforming, which you have just experienced. But the principle remains that if the Jew doesn't like what you were saying, he can do anything to destroy your life, including the physical murder of you or anyone else. That's the fundamental (problem).So we enter 2000, the new year, with that question unresolved. It's still unresolved. Which way are we going to go? Which way is humanity going to go?(Read the full transcript at my Substack. And on a lighter note, check out my Top Ten Life Hacks for 2025.) This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Help! Genocidal Zionist Stripe deplatformed me so I can’t get paid through Substack. Here is the monthly workaround for January 2025: http://spot.fund/51krmzsc Better yet, offer a monthly or annual donation HERE.Life Hacks for 20251. Invest wisely in your Substacks. Which ones are consistently putting out good stuff? Which are the most courageous and/or have the most integrity and/or can occasionally offer comic relief? And which of those are run by non-super-famous people who could actually use your help? Plugs: I’m impressed by the consistency and quality of Oliver Boyd-Barrett, no relation, and greatly appreciate the work of Laurent Guyenot, Linh Dinh, Laura, Jonathan Cook, and various others I apologize for leaving out.But there is only one Substack, that I know of, that publishes almost daily, offers all its content free to everybody, and does not accept money through evil, genocidal Stripe. (Hint hint.)2. Don’t doomscroll—watch False Flag Weekly News instead! Why waste time subjecting yourself to random blasts of depressing chaos? We do that so you don’t have to! Watch FFWN for one hour each week and you’ll understand what’s really going on and how bad it really is and why you’re better off doing fun and/or productive things throughout the rest of the week.3. Feed your cat sardines. But make sure your cat is willing to share them with you. That way you’ll get the nutritional benefit of fish oil, protein, calcium, and other good things. And you’ll also have a happy, healthy cat. Here in Morocco fresh sardines are about 50 cents a pound, and you can get a big plate of them roasted for under $2. But wherever you are, whether or not you even have a cat, canned sardines are a nutritional bargain and taste alright with green onions and cream cheese. (This has been a public service message from the Moroccan Sardine Council and its spokesfeline, Muse the Cat.)4. Speaking of nutrition…If you can stand to lose a few pounds like I can, try eating just one meal a day. Here’s what’s been working for me: Instead of breakfast, I sip blended green tea with coconut oil on and off throughout the morning and early afternoon. For some reason (ketosis?) that satisfies my hunger. I take my only daily meal circa mid to late afternoon. This approach is much cheaper and healthier than Ozempic. If it works for me, subjected to much temptation by a wife who is an amazing cook, it can work for anybody.5. Develop an exercise habit. Ideally it should be something you like doing. (Having lost a few pounds I can now run miles on the beach and then swim off the sweat.)6. Do deep relaxation meditation, preferably while focusing on what we theists call God, though I realize people from other traditions and backgrounds call He/She/It various things in various languages. When I do the five-times-daily salat prayer, I focus hard on God and get into a state that’s almost like falling asleep. (Fortunately I haven’t yet collapsed into complete unconsciousness during the Friday congregational prayer.) And I also have put together a 20 minute binaural beat mediation tape featuring a recorded chant of the 99 names of God. Email me at truthjihad(at)gmail if you want to try it.7. Hang out, watch people, converse. Linh Dinh spends his life in cafés doing that, and he’s still going strong despite many decades of ignoring the kind of advice I just gave you about nutrition and exercise and meditation. 8. Cultivate spontaneity. After my wife yelled at me that I was a typical control-freak Westerner, I realized she was right, loosened up, and bought us both one way tickets to a foreign land. We will have to get back by bus, train, ferry, hitchhiking, swimming…whatever, whenever. If we end up stranded in some weird unforeseeable situation or place, it will serve us both right. Especially her.9. Deny the Holocaust. Scientific studies show that Holocaust deniers are happier, healthier, and better looking than non-deniers. Holocaust denial can help you lose weight (especially the oppressive weight of imposed ideologies) and help you find real friends (by alienating all your fake friends so you’ll know who the real ones are). What’s more, Chinese astrology tells us that Holocaust denial is especially auspicious in years named after reptiles, such as this year, the Year of the Dragon, and next year, the Year of the Wood Snake. So don’t delay—deny the Holocaust today!10) If you are a Zionist, maybe even if you aren’t, grow a freaking sense of humor! It works wonders against self-importance, narcissism, fanaticism, and other ills that are characteristic of, but not limited to, Zionists. It can also help you endure the world’s insanity. So if you’re sitting in a cubicle in Tel Aviv being paid to read this, it would behoove you to fall out of your chair and roll around on the ground laughing at yourself.Okay, those are my top ten life hacks for 2025. If you don’t want me to start writing this kind of schlock for a living, or—even worse—become a maker of cat vide

Rumble link Bitchute linkCommunications professor Oliver Boyd Barrett ponders “Sinking Russian Ships, Propping Up Bankrupt Losers and Supporting Genocide. Your West This Christmas.”Excerpt:Kevin Barrett: So it looks like we might survive to see another year after that was a dubious prospect for a while there. But where do we even start with the way this geopolitical crisis is going way off the rails with grossly irresponsible behavior from the Western side? And what many would see is inadequate ripostes from the pro-multilateralism and pro-multipolar world side? I know your latest article started with that mention of these mysteriously sinking Russian defense-linked cargo ships Are we in a war of vandalism? Communications cables just got cut again and they're blaming Russia. And of course, the Nord Stream pipeline was blown up by Biden and company. And now Russian ships are mysteriously sinking. Where is this all going?-Oliver Boyd-Barrett: This is a new wave of escalation with the West accusing Russian and Chinese ships of putting out cable links between Estonia and Finland. I'm not quite sure and I haven't seen any really convincing assessment yet of the actual damage that ripping up these cables is alleged to have done. My understanding about the internet at least is that it is constructed, the infrastructure of the internet is built precisely in order to protect internet communication from specific attacks on specific locations. So I think that the issue of the cables being dragged up by a ship's anchors, I believe the story is, is not totally implausible, although one wonders why these kinds of instances haven't happened more frequently. And I find it difficult to imagine that ships would deliberately even be capable of identifying and then using anchors to pull these cables up. I'm even surprised that the Baltic Sea is not sufficiently deep to make it impossible for this kind of accident to occur. So in brief, Kevin, I'm very skeptical about these stories. But I'm open to persuasion and I hope that we'll see some firmer evidence in support or at least evidence that would allow us to perhaps to dismiss these stories.More credible, although we're still lacking in hard evidence, are stories to do with the sinking of Russian cargo ships, And at least in one case, and I suspect in more cases, these were tankers carrying alleged to be carrying Russian oil to European destinations, but skirting the sanctions regime against Russian oil and gas exports imposed by the European Union.So we haven't seen this phenomenon before, particularly in the Mediterranean, and also in the Black Sea.. That is, I think, alarming. So it's very likely to be a new wave of escalation that has to do with direct attacks on infrastructure, whose ultimate aim is to further cut infrastructural links between Russia and the West.(Full transcript available at my Substack.) This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkGordon Duff, editor of The Intel Drop, discusses “THE IMPACT OF THE RHEINLAND LIE – FILLING ROMAN GERMANY WITH IMAGINARY JEWS.”Excerpt:Gordon Duff: I'm sitting at 7,200 references right now at 435 pages..Kevin Barrett: What do you mean you're sitting on it? Are you sitting on a book you're writing?Yeah, I'm sitting on a book I'm writing. 35 pages that, if it would go anywhere, would change everything. But it isn't so much attacking the Jews. It's really turned into something quite different. It simply explains who people are. And if you're doing this stuff, if you're doing academic work, which you and I are both trained to do, you kind of have to put the biases aside and let things go where they're going and run with the material and not push everything into the box you wanted to go in.Yeah, sometimes you actually learn something while you're doing research.Yeah, and what we've managed to do is utterly disassemble all things European history. That's all totally fake. And anything that said that Jews lived in Europe before the 10th century is fake. You know, there weren't any. There weren't Jews before the 10th century. This is a tough one. This is the kind of rules you have to live with. People of the Jewish faith or the Judean Hebrew faith or the Judeo-Samaritan Hebrew faith, which if you're being more accurate, before the 18th century cannot be called Jews because there was no such word.No, no, wait, let me stop you for a second, Gordon. So you say there's no such thing as the word Jew, but in other languages, like, for instance, in French, it's a juif, juden in Germany, all that. So none of those words existed?No, no, no. You're going a little further here. You're picking up 19th century references, not the original list from the French. And a juden is a Judean. There is no, there is, now this is a listen carefully moment for you, Kevin. We did a study, a linguistic study here, and I have a linguistic study, comes out about 45 pages on this. It has over 400 references. And here's what was decided. There are absolutely zero references, zero evidence that any of the Middle Ages terms for Judeans actually linguistically morphed into the word Jew. It never happened. The French term, the German term are not the root for the term Jew. “Jew” was a fabrication that came with Zionism. It is not related in any way linguistically whatsoever. to the word Judean, Hebrew, or anything tied to the Middle East at all.How about Yehud? In Arabic, it's Yehud or Yehudi.There is no evidence that Yehud in Arabic in any way is related to the term Jew, J-E-W. No linguistic evidence of any relationship other than the letter J because Judea exists. It's Judea.But what's in a name? A Jew by any other name would smell as…kosher.(Read the full transcript at my Substack) This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkPress TV’s Yemen correspondent Yusef Al-Hamoudi and I discussed Yemen’s successful hit on Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv. The strike, which “Israel” is denying, came a few hours ago as retaliation for “Israel”’s terrorist attack yesterday on Sanaa International Airport.Excerpts:Yusef Al-Hamoudi: Demonstrations have been held here in Yemen, in the north province of Sa'dah. These were the early morning protests and the big protest, the million man march is expected to take place in less than two hours from now here in the Yemeni capital Sana'a. Now, it is likely that Israel will strike during the protests, just like yesterday when they conducted THE ATTACK ON SANAA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WAS ACTUALLY DURING THE SPEECH OF SAYYED ABDAL MALIK BADRAD DIN, THE ANSARULLAH LEADER, AND THEY WANTED TO SEND A MESSAGE THAT WHENEVER THESE EVENTS UNFOLD, THEY WANT TO REMIND THE YEMENI PEOPLE THAT THERE ARE ISRAELI FIGHTER JETS THAT ARE FLYING OVER THE SKIES OF SANAA. BUT THAT'S NOT GOING TO DETER THE YEMENI PEOPLE FROM TAKEN TO THE STREETS EVERY SINGLE FRIDAY. THESE PROTESTS HAVE BEEN HELD EVERY SINGLE FRIDAY SINCE OCTOBER 7. AND THEY WILL CONTINUE TO TAKE TO THE STREETS REGARDLESS. EVEN IF THEY KNEW AN ISRAELI AIR STRIKE WAS GOING TO TARGET THEM AT THE 70 SQUARE, IT WILL STILL NOT DETER THEM FROM TAKEN TO THE STREETS BECAUSE OF THE HIGH LIKELIHOOD OF THESE PROTESTS BEING TARGETED. BUT THE MAIN MISSION GOING FORWARD IS GOING TO BE THE MILITARY ESCALATIONS FROM YEMEN'S END. We have confirmation that the Yemeni armed forces will continue to launch the hypersonic missiles, the drones, the cruise missiles. They will continue to impose the blockade. Look, the attack that occurred hours ago, this was an attack against Israeli interests, against the Israeli airport, and also against Israeli-linked ship in the Arabian Sea.Kevin Barrett:And so when you're being targeted with that kind of over-the-top terrorism, sometimes you have to respond in kind. And so Yemen's measured response with its hypersonic strike on Ben Gurion Airport is absolutely necessary. And I think the resistance axis and its supporters in the region, which is, of course, the majority of the population of the region is on board with the resistance in this genocide, needs to step up and act more boldly and forthrightly. And Yemen is leading the way. The only time the Zionists ever back off is when they're forced to back off. And I would imagine that at some point they're going to be forced to back off from this entire genocidal war that they're waging because they initially said that they were going to defeat Hamas in a month or two. And now it's been a year, almost a year and a half, and they're getting nowhere. All they can do is massacre tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of civilians. They claim that they could defeat Lebanon and steal all the land up to the Latani River. And they lost. They were forced to back out. And now they're in this tit-for-tat war with Yemen. And once again, they're going to fail. And that might be the straw that breaks the proverbial camel's back. and imposes the reality on the people of occupied Palestine that this insane extremist like Kudnik Netanyahu government surrounded by genocidal maniacs like Smotrich and Ben-Gavir has utterly and completely failed. They not only failed to protect their own people from the heroic raid on October 7th of 2023, but they also have failed to defeat any military forces that they're opposed to. All they can do is commit terrorism And at some point the Jewish people of occupied Palestine, who have acquiesced to this genocide and will forever bear the consequences of that stigma are going to wake up and notice that their government has completely failed and lost the war, and they're going to get rid of this government, and Netanyahu is going to spend the rest of his life in prison. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link FFWN linkBy Kevin Barrett, for American Free Press“Israel is a cancer on the Middle East.” Resistance leaders across the region have used that metaphor for generations. The Zionists who dominate American politics, finance and media have attacked it as inappropriate.But is the metaphor inaccurate? Cancer occurs when a diseased cell or cells begin uncontrollably expanding at the expense of neighboring cells and organ systems. Israel, a malignant body of extremist fanatics implanted into the heart of the Middle East, keeps mindlessly and voraciously expanding, not unlike a virulent tumor. Such pathological Zionist growth has caused untold pain, suffering, and hardship for the people of Palestine, the region, and the world.Let’s chart Israel’s malignant growth. The original version of modern Israel, as set forth in the Balfour Declaration (1917) consisted of a mere “Jewish homeland” (not a state) guaranteed not to impinge on the rights of non-Jews—who constituted the vast majority of the population and owned virtually all of the land of historic Palestine. After the invading Jewish terrorists began running amok, as recounted in Thomas Suarez’s magisterial State of Terror: How Terrorism Created Modern Israel, Britain rewarded them with the 1937 Peel Commission partition plan, which would have created Israel on 33% of Palestine, leaving the other 67% for Palestinians.The Peel Commission plan was outright theft. Palestinians owned well over 90% of the land of Palestine, yet the Commission wanted to steal almost one-third of their land and hand it to Eastern European Jewish terrorist invaders. But even such grand larceny wasn’t enough for the Zionists. They held out for more, and got it in 1948 by bribing US President Truman with a suitcase containing two million dollars in cash (as recounted by John F. Kennedy to Gore Vidal). That bribe, and others like it, produced the UN’s partition plan, which almost doubled the size of the Peel Commission’s Israel.But even that outrageous robbery did not satisfy the Zionist terrorists, who immediately began massacring Palestinians and invading territory outside their UN borders. When the Nakba (Palestinian Holocaust) was over, untold thousands of Palestinians were dead, and more than 750,000 survivors had been robbed of their land and property and forced into exile as permanent refugees. After perpetrating the 1948 holocaust the Zionists refused to return to their UN-approved borders, which would have given them more than 55% of Palestine, and instead continued occupying almost 80%.But even that didn’t satisfy them. The Zionist leadership spent the next two decades plotting what would become the 1967 war of aggression, in which they stole another 77,000 square kilometers consisting of the West Bank including Jerusalem, the Gaza Strip, the Golan Heights, and the Sinai Peninsula. Together, those stolen territories are almost four times the size of pre-1967 Israel.After 1967, Zionist leaders split between those willing to return stolen territory in return for peace, and those dedicated to endless wars of expansion. With the assassination of the land-for-peace Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in 1995, the issue was definitively settled in favor of the “forever wars” party.Rabin was an anomaly—a mere speed bump on the road to Greater Israel. The Zionist leadership has always tacitly agreed that Israel will keep expanding to its Biblical mandate and beyond. David Ben-Gurion defined Zionism’s goal as follows: “to create a Jewish state in the whole of the Land of Israel.” That “whole” includes Palestine, Lebanon, Jordan, and part of Egypt, Syria, Iraq, northern Arabia, and arguably Turkey. Such conquests will require genocidal war against those countries and peoples.2024 will go down in history as the year the Zionist cancer metastasized, sending its toxic tendrils even further into northern Gaza, the West Bank, southern Lebanon, and Syria. Netanyahu’s minister Smotrich is calling for the full annexation of the West Bank and Gaza and the murder or expulsion of all Palestinians from historic Palestine. That process is already underway as northern Gaza is being emptied and Israel has grabbed a full 6000 acres of the West Bank. Meanwhile Israel is violating its ceasefire agreement with Lebanon in an attempt to steal all of south Lebanon up to the Litani River. And in the wake of the US-Turkish-Israeli overthrow of the Syrian government, Israel has massively attacked Syria and grabbed vast swathes of Syrian land.The ever-expanding cancer of Zionism poses a clear and present danger to the region and the world. The driving force behind Zionism is a virulent version of Jewish messianic millenarianism whose endgame is a Jewish military leader conquering not just the region, but the whole world, and then establishing a Jewish global dictatorship based in Occupied Jerusalem.First they came for the Palestinians. Israel’s neighbors are next. But this isn’t just a regional pr

Rumble link Bitchute linkRolf Lindgren joins from Madison, Wisconsin to discuss the recent school shooting. Rolf is a Republican Party events organizer who is well-connected among the conservative minority in Madison that sends their kids to Abundant Life Christian School. We also argue about whether Trump Regime 2.0 will be significantly better than the 2016-2020 iteration that armed Ukraine to the teeth with NATO weapons, attacked China and Iran with COVID-19 sparking a global pandemic, risked World War 3 by murdering the hero Gen. Soleimani, and forced abnormalization on the Middle East setting the stage for the current genocide of Gaza.Read the full transcript at my Substack page—click above the image to the right. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkNote: David Skrbina joins at the 29 minute mark.In the wake of CEO-slayer Luigi Mangione becoming a folk hero, an anti-genocide fighter getting arrested for targeting genocide perpetrators, and less-defensible non-state-sponsored violence reaching epidemic proportions in the USA, it’s a good time to talk about the minuscule fraction of human violence that isn’t perpetrated by governments.Philosophy professor and technology critic David Skrbina returns to the Truth Jihad podcast to discuss the hoopla around Unabomber Ted Kaczynski’s influence on American young people in general, and CEO-slayer Luigi Mangione in particular. While teaching at the University of Michigan, Skrbina corresponded extensively with the imprisoned Kaczynski and served as his editor. He writes: “This whole issue extends beyond technology to that of any corrupt social system (like health care) and how people might respond.”Excerpt from the interview:David Skrbina: Again, that's, again, an interesting parallel between Luigi and Ted, right? They were both combating a larger system, of which they are a very small part. And so there's this perennial dilemma of a large organizational structure which is unjust or illegal or needs to be reformed or changed or overthrown. How does an individual or a small group of individuals have any effect on this process? With an organizational structure that contains hundreds or thousands of people, (violence) doesn't really do any good. Even if you kill one or two of them, the system will just work around it and will replace them and it will move on. So so all you can do is gain attention, gain the notoriety, maybe use that to get a message out, maybe to send a message right to others that that extreme action is being taken by by individual people out there.So, in Ted's case, he was willing to take extreme action and he was willing to send a detailed message in terms of the manifesto. We can only guess in Mangione's case that he's maybe willing trying to send a message like like these CEOs cannot act with impunity and that they will somehow pay a price for extremely unjust action. I guess we can assume that that's really what Luigi had in mind. It's hard to know unless we hear from him directly. Read the full transcript at my Substack by clicking on the “transcript” button above the image to the right. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkBestselling author James Perloff discusses “Donald Trump and Orwell’s Doublethink.” Perloff, a noted expert on the New World Order, voted for Trump but has very low expectations, especially after seeing his appointments. Unlike folks drunk on Trump kool-aid, Perloff is skeptical of claims that the president-elect is a pro-nationalism patriot who opposes the NWO:“I have been studying the New World Order since 1978 and writing about it professionally since 1986. I have seen it continually advance and consolidate its power. Nothing is impossible, but four coming years of ‘peace and prosperity’? I doubt it.”Bottom line:“The World Economic Forum’s entire agenda could materialize under Donald Trump without many patriots even realizing it.”Transcript begins:I'm Kevin Barrett, broadcasting on and off various alternative networks since 2006. And now it's been many years I've been right here at revolution.radio, the finest in free speech alternative networks. Please support revolution.radio. And if you can find a way to support me before I get completely debanked, that would be great.Stripe debanked my Substack, which was most of what I had coming in. They probably did that because, well, I guess I must be doing something right. So anyway, I guess I'll get to doing something right here by bringing on James Perloff for the second hour of tonight's broadcast.James Perloff is a best-selling author and a New World Order expert. His new piece on Trump, Donald Trump and Orwell's Doublethink struck me as apropos, because so many people who are totally opposed to the so-called New World Order and the leadership of this godforsaken society seem to think that Trump is somehow a real alternative. Well, we're alternatives, James and I, but I don't know if Trump is. So let's talk about it. Hey, welcome, James. How are you doing?I'm doing good, Kevin. Thank you for having me on. Your piece on Trump and Orwell is great. I gave up on Trump a while back. But when I saw that fake shooting on July 13th, that was the last straw for me. That was just so over the top. Did you get a chance to look into that?I had a lot of different theories that it was a real shooting or that it missed or that it was a warning to Trump or that he staged the whole thing. I know Ole Domogard believes it was completely staged. I don't have a firm opinion, but there were a lot of anomalies, like the fact that the shooting had been pointed out to Secret Service and security, and they did nothing about it. And then that iconic picture of Trump raising his fist, they just happened to catch the American flag in the background.The Secret Service never should have let him stand up and shake his fist like that. Who knows how many people are shooting at him, right? I mean, that's ridiculous. That's the dog that didn't bark. It's like Bush in the school during 9/11. I assume a lot of my audience already is aware of how Bush was left in a known location on 9/11. Supposedly there was a surprise attack, crashing jetliners from the air. Bush was left in that pre-announced known location. He could have easily been targeted from the air. He was he was left there for almost an hour reading about pet goats with schoolchildren and shaking everybody's hand and smiling. And they took a nice leisurely drive back to Air Force One. He didn't get off the ground for almost an hour after everybody knew that America was under attack. That's the dog that didn't bark. The Secret Service had to have known that Bush wasn't really being threatened. There wasn't any real surprise attack on 9/11.And the same is true with Trump getting up and shaking his fist after he's been shot at and supposedly hit. I mean, give me a break. Obviously he wasn't hit. There's not one shred of evidence that his ear was even nicked or scratched. He used a blood capsule or maybe the Secret Service scraped it or something with a knife. I think it was a blood capsule personally.A blood what?A blood capsule. That's what professional wrestlers use to make it look like they're bleeding.Oh, okay. That's a good point. I hadn't heard that before.Yeah, I'll send you some links of the people who've actually looked into this. But anyway, yeah, so I think you're very, very right to be a Trump skeptic. And so where do you even start with the reasons for Trump skepticism?Well, my article talks about Orwell's doublethink...it included an extensive quotation of Pastor Chuck Baldwin, who listed out promises that Trump broke during his first administration. And I added to that. Just to mention some of them: investigating Hillary, promising to drain the swamp, promising to reduce deficit spending, saying that children received all these vaccinations and saying that it was linked to autism, but then when the president's saying that children have to get their shots, promising to get America out of their Middle East wars but actually dropping four times more bombs than Barack Obama and five times more bombs tha

Rumble link Bitchute link Note: Kevin has been canceled by Stripe—workarounds are Spotfund and Paypal.In this week’s False Flag Weekly News, State Department whistleblower J. Michael Springmann and I wondered why Mohamed al-Jawlani, who used to be a “bad terrorist” when he worked for ISIS and al-Qaeda, has suddenly become a “good terrorist” now that he’s changed his name to al-Jewlani, excuse me, al-Julani, and taken over Syria on behalf of the Turks, the CIA, and the Zionists (not necessarily in that order). It’s like an ongoing good-news-bad-news joke: The bad news is that al-Julani used to be Deputy-Headchopper-in-Chief of ISIS. The good news is that he resigned. The bad news is that he joined al-Qaeda. The good news is that he resigned from al-Qaeda too. The bad news is that he started his own terrorist group, HTS. The good news is that HTS is a branch of the CIA and is now in charge of Syria.The whole notion of “good terrorist,” explored by Doris Lessing in one of her lesser novels, raises interesting questions, including: What exactly is terrorism, and when is it good? That question has been on people’s minds since (alleged) homegrown American terrorist Luigi Mangione (allegedly) shot United Health Care CEO Brian Thompson. Most of the internet seems to think Luigi is a good terrorist, or at least a good-looking one. Amir of the HRmachine1949 Substack has nominated Luigi for Person of the Year. But wait a minute—weren’t Americans successfully brainwashed against “terrorism” on September 11, 2001? Don’t we all agree that political violence against civilians is morally wrong? Apparently we don’t. In a desperate attempt to figure out why we have become so evil, I turned to a non-member of the human species, namely Muse the Cat, to get an outsider’s perspective. Interview With Muse the CatSo Muse, I understand you are going to argue in favor of terrorism and nuclear proliferation. Don’t you realize you can’t do that?B******t. I’m a freaking cat. I can say anything I want.I envy you your free speech.Comes with the territory. Nobody deplatforms cats.Can’t debank you either, I guess. So Muse, give us the rundown on why terrorism and nuclear proliferation are so wonderful.Sure thing. So let’s start with terrorism. There are two definitions of terrorism, the official one and the unofficial one. The official definition is “political violence against civilians intended to incite fear and terror.” But that’s what governments do—especially the US and Israeli governments. Yet the media never calls it terrorism. So to understand how the word is actually used, we have to turn to the unofficial definition: “political violence that the Establishment doesn’t like.” Frankly, I think we could use a whole lot more of that.I agree that the current Establishment is evil. But violence isn’t the solution.Isn’t it? Why not? Think about it from a cat’s perspective. For us, the world is divided into three kinds of critters: the ones cats eat, the ones that eat cats, and cats. (Humans are considered big, powerful cats.) And within the world of cats, there are strong cats and there are weak cats. There are cats that have a really lucrative territory, like me, thanks to all those fresh Moroccan sardines you feed me, and others that aren’t so lucky. The whole web of life is like that. There are stronger critters, and there are weaker critters. The strong periodically attack the weak to eat them or to steal their territory and resources. So how can you stop a stronger critter from doing that to you? I’ll tell you how: You terrorize them! You scare the bejeezus out of them by raising a prospect of violence, and potential harm to themselves, that they are unwilling to accept.By the way, that’s why I terrorize the neighborhood cats to the point that you guys keep me on a leash. I don’t want any other cats horning in on my sardine action.You have a well-deserved reputation as the worst feline terrorist in the neighborhood. When I walk you on the leash and the other cats see us coming, they turn tail and run for their lives. In that respect, you are a very BAD cat.Thank you, I’ll take that as a compliment.Maybe you’re right that I should be nicer to the local cats. But what if I were a total pacifist? Every time you guys cooked sardines, and that delicious odor wafted through the open windows, the local cats would come running and crowd around the dish, and I’d be lucky to get a couple of scales and a scrap of bone.And what if the local dogs knew I was a pacifist? What if they were confident that I would never, ever claw their eyes out, no matter what? My nine lives would get used up pretty quick. That’s why all veterinarians, indeed all sensible people, agree that it’s not just cruel, but completely insane and unnatural, to declaw a cat. I can’t believe they used to do that! That was back in the Dark Ages, Muse, before humans became civilized. Civilized?! What do you mean, civilized!? They still cut our balls off!You know I would never do

Rumble link Bitchute linkPress TVA disabled young man is the latest victim of the Israeli regime’s deadly incursions into the occupied West Bank. The 23-year-old Mohammed Ahmed Maslameh was shot in Beit Awwa west of the city of al-Khalil. He was brought to hospital with critical gunshot wounds to the chest and succumbed to his injuries shortly after. The Israeli forces also raided the village of Umm Safa northwest of Ramallah. Local officials said the regime soldiers stormed the village shortly after the Friday noon prayers, preventing the movement of residents and searching their vehicles. Since the outbreak of the U.S.-Israeli genocidal war on Gaza last year, Israeli forces have intensified their raids in the West Bank, abducting at least eleven thousand nine hundred Palestinians.Mr. Barrett, welcome to the program. Let's jump right in and get your perspective on this continued aggression against Palestinians in the West Bank that we've been seeing by the Israeli regime, a nonstop trend ever since the genocide war on Gaza started in October of last year.Yes, this is not only a ramped up genocide of Gaza, but they're also targeting the rest of Palestine as well. And in fact, the Zionists have made it absolutely clear that they are planning to murder and expel all Palestinians from all of historic Palestine. They've ordered their captive American politicians to stop referring to the West Bank and instead use these biblical genocide names of Judea and Samaria for this region.And although Smotrich and Ben-Gavir and people like that are the only ones who are saying it completely out loud, the entire Israeli leadership is pretty much singing from the same hymn book, just a little bit quieter. And they've got the incoming American administration on board with this now. Sheldon Adelson's widow, Miriam Adelson, gave Trump $100 million, allegedly in return for Trump's promise to allow the Zionists to ethnically cleanse the West Bank and declare their sovereignty over it.So the West Bank is being targeted along with the rest of Palestine. And the slow motion genocide and the genocidal violence afflicting the West Bank may not be as spectacular as Gaza—I don't know if any violence in all of human history ever has been quite as spectacular as this absolutely insane bloodshed, these deliberate massacres of civilians and women and children that have been going on in Gaza.But they're also planning to expel Palestinians from the West Bank as well. And they're planning to steal as much of neighboring countries as they can possibly steal. We just saw them try to steal parts of Syria. They were rebuffed trying to steal parts of Lebanon, but they're not going to give up forever.The Zionists are completely out of control. This project is genocidal. It's criminal. It's a classic war of aggression against all of its neighbors. And the region, the Muslim Ummah and the Global South, realizes that this whole Zionist project needs to be put out of its misery. And the problem is how to do that. And it's going to be a problem for apparently the coming years at least, if not decades.And one more issue, Mr. Barrett. I guess one of the matters that is the most perplexing here is how mainstream media has basically swept whatever is taking place in the West Bank under the rug. And it's completely turned a blind eye to all the atrocities and the crimes that the Israelis are carrying out in the occupied West Bank.Yes. I noticed that, for instance, this report about the killing that we just saw is nowhere to be found in Western mainstream media. I used the search engines. I looked all over for it. It's just not there. Apparently, they don't care.Any time that an Israeli Jew gets killed, that's front page news. But they've been killing Palestinians throughout all of Palestine. for decades, and it just doesn't get reported. There was a study by ifamericansknew.org quite some time ago that looked at New York Times coverage, the relative coverage of Israeli deaths and Palestinian deaths, and they found that the Zionist settler deaths were given something like almost 100 times as much play in the Western media on the average.And so there are many reasons for this, but the biggest reason is that people loyal to the Zionists are in the driver's seat in Western media, in Western finance and in Western politics. And the relatively moderate genocidal Zionists, so-called, among the liberal Jews, have been shoved aside by the fanatical extremists who are now taking power in the United States with the incoming Trump administration. And the rest of the Western people have not fully understood what's been done to them, that they've been subjected to a hostile takeover of their civilization by this fanatical messianic millenarian cult dedicated to committing genocide in Palestine and ultimately ruling the world from Palestine.That's their eschatology. They believe that their so-called messiah is going to be a world dictator, a military leader who conquers al

Rumble link Bitchute link . Note: Kevin has been canceled by Stripe—workarounds are Spotfund and Paypal.Market analyst and investor Alex Krainer wonders whether by suddenly giving up Syria without a fight, Iran and Russia may have set a trap for the Zio-American Empire: “This surprised nobody. The (claim) that they came by surprise is just is inconceivable to me. That the Russians signed a truce with duplicitous backstabbing Erdogan and then they completely took their eye off the ball and just thought that ‘we have nothing to worry about there’—that’s inconceivable to me. And so the only explanation that makes sense to me is that this was by design. Also, the way the Syrian army folded, it wasn’t just one place. It was a place after place after place after place. From the top, too. It was coordinated. So they were given orders to pull back, to demobilize, to melt away. And then the question is why?“The only place you walk into that easily is a trap. And so once you remember, how did the West finally break the Soviet Union? They drew them into Afghanistan. So that was the Soviet Union’s quagmire. It’s actually not rocket science.”We’ll also discuss Alex’s warning that London may be in the crosshairs for a false flag attack.Excerpts:Kevin Barrett: So Alex, should we start with the London webcams? Have they been turned back on? Whatever happened to those?Alex Krainer: I have no idea whether they've been turned back on. Last I checked was a few days ago, and they were not. They were still black. What happened since then, because it's been about 10 days since I posted my article, I assume that they're still black. I guess I could check, but I'm assuming that they're black.For me, that's a very suspicious thing because there are several hundred webcams around London. And since I published my article, a handful of people wrote back and they said oh, look, this one's working and this one's working. And in fact, it turned out to be two of them working. Two or three people wrote back that the one on Abbey Road is working, and I checked. It is. And then a couple of them pointed out another one. I forget which one. It's working.But all the other ones are black. So that's not something that can happen randomly, just by some random error that all of a sudden several hundred webcams go offline or go black all at the same time. And I found it very, very alarming because somebody obviously had to make a decision about that. It's a major European city. What's the reason why the webcams should be off? To me, the likely reason for that is that they are preparing a false flag attack and that they are hiding evidence. Let's suppose that they are going to detonate a nuclear device above London, or a dirty bomb or some kind of a very big explosion. Maybe they would spend a few months shipping out the artwork, shipping out the gold, whatever valuable things they don't want to be destroyed or don't want to be looted. And they might be shipping in the explosives. And so maybe it's better that no evidence of that remains recorded anywhere. So that could be the reason. But why would our venerable leaders in the West, our dear leaders, do such a nefarious thing? Well, as we know—and I documented this in my article that I published a few days ago—we've had several among the most prominent Western leaders,among whom General Mark Milley and Boris Johnson and President Morawiecki of Poland, all saying the same thing: that, quote-unquote, "if we lose in Ukraine, it will be the end of Western hegemony. We will lose the world for generations." Statements to that effect, and some of them in those exact words.So how big are the stakes? The stakes are huge.And we have seen them desperately trying to somehow engineer consent for war in Europe among the Western public. Because we know that there's no willingness among the Western public to escalate the war, to go collectively to war against Russia, to start another world war on the European continent. And so perhaps consent could be obtained if you had some kind of a very very emotionally charged event, something very spectacular, visible to everyone, happen. And then they could say, oh look at what the Russians have done to us! Now we have to go and kill them!A mushroom cloud over London would be pretty iconic.A mushroom cloud over London would be one of those indelible images that would stay with us for all eternity. And if West prevailed in this war by any chance, it would be enshrined in history that Russia dropped a nuclear bomb on London.And then these recent provocations with storm shadow missiles and the ATACAMs also work to that angle. Because all of a sudden, the Western powers that decided, all of them, the United States included, to authorize Ukraine to launch long range, Western provided missiles to strike deep into Russia. Strategically, that doesn't change anything. It's not going to change the trajectory of the war. It's not going to turn things around for Ukraine. They can inflict

Rumble link Bitchute link I have been debanked by Stripe, so please: Donate through Paypal Donate through SpotfundRichie Allen, a leading candidate for best host in international talk radio, has returned from his sabbatical refreshed and well-informed. (He must not have been on a news fast!) Below is a transcript of our conversation. -KBRichie Allen: What can you glean from people locally (in Morocco) in terms of how they view cataclysmic geopolitical events like what we've seen in Syria in the last week or days? ...In light of what happened in the last week or so, the the fleeing of Bashar al-Assad to Russia, the taking of Damascus by a conglomerate of so-called rebels... What's the mood, Kevin, as far as you can ascertain in your own town there in Morocco?Kevin Barrett: Well, Richie, I think a lot of people in the West don't really understand how people in the MENA region—that's Middle East North Africa region—see these things. And it's a little more complicated than the alternative media narrative versus the mainstream narrative, where the Axis of Resistance, for people like me, is the good guys, right? The folks resisting genocide are the good guys, and that would have included the Assad government in Syria. And all of the other forces tend to be more nefarious.But basically, people here seem to be both absolutely fed up, appalled, and at their wit's end by this genocide of Gaza, which is the central issue affecting the whole global south. But they're not so much attached to the Axis of Resistance. There's been a certain amount of success, I think, with the propaganda campaign that's been designed to sort of contain Islamic Iran, and convince people in the so-called Sunni Muslim world that Iran and its Axis of Resistance are not all they're cracked up to be.So for that reason, a lot of people in Morocco, even while they appreciated to some extent the way that Iran and its allies have been trying to stop the genocide—and certainly everybody here has been cheering for the Houthis as they shut down shipping in the Red Sea, and cheering for Hezbollah and mourning the loss of these great resistance leaders. But at the same time, there's a feeling that some of the the Axis of Resistance, particularly the Assad government, is not really capable of taking on the Zionists.And so there's a propaganda talking point that's out there. I don't really think it's a strong, true talking point, but a lot of people here kind of believe it, which is that we need to get rid of Assad so we can get rid of the Zionists. "Assad didn't really do anything to stop the slow motion genocide of Palestine. He talks a good game, but he and his Iranian friends, they haven't really been very successful. And now that the majority population of Syria is back in the driver's seat, backed by Turkey, which wants to restore the Ottoman Empire, which of course used to run that part of the world with consent and was viewed as legitimate by the people there, that now we actually may be seeing down the line a force that can actually stop Zionism.And so people here are actually kind of happy about whats happening in Syria. I'm not. I was cheering for the Axis of Resistance. I thought Bashar al-Assad was one of the very few decent human beings in a leadership position. But maybe he was too decent to be a powerful leader.A number of journalists I've been hearing from in recent days—these would be Western mainstream journalists. So immediately the starting point is you've got to take what they say, with a large dose of salt. But a number of them are reflecting on their knowledge of Bashar al-Assad pre-2011 and shortly after 2011. And the picture one or two of these old hacks are painting is that this guy was a fairly weak guy.Now, one or two of these journalists have even sounded like they've been inclined to give him a bit of a pass in terms of separating him from the Syrian army. There was always a large body of Syrians, not necessarily backed by the West, by the United States or by Israel, or not necessarily backed by Turkey, but just Syrians who hated Hafez al-Assad, his father, and hated the notion that the Assad dynasty was going to continue when Bashar al-Assad came back from the UK in the mid-noughties to take the throne.I suppose the point I'm making is, could it be that he didn't really have any control over, or didn't have as much or enough control over his own military? Is that a fair question, and could it be legitimate? I'm thinking in terms of, we all know the Arab Spring and the National Endowment for Democracy, and we all know there was an awful lot of outside interference and stirring up tension in Tunisia, in Egypt, and then Syria. Of course, I know that. But there were always large, large numbers of people who were fed up with the status quo, with that way of living. You kind of get what I'm getting at here, that Assad was kind of lost in the middle of all of that, really, and didn't really have any real power. What do you think of

Rumble link Bitchute linkRichard Solomon, author of The Tao Guide to Navigating the Satanic Matrix, discusses his brand-new article “Trump Win 2.0 Vis-à-vis China.” Interview excerpt:Richard Solomon is one of the best writers on the internet in my humble opinion, and maybe in his less humble opinion. He just published a great new piece at the Uunz Review that came up right before the show started. It's called "Trump Win Vis-a-vis China and His Role in End-Stage Hyper-Capitalism." Now that's a mouthful. Tell us about it, Richard. And tell us about yourself. Who are you and how did you become one of the best internet writers out there?Well, before I begin, if it's okay with you, can I just plug my new book? It's called The Tao Guide to Navigating the Satanic Matrix. And anybody can get a free digital copy on taoisnow.org.So are you like an evangelical Taoist?I'm like a westernized Taoist in the sense that I'm a product of the American cultural milieu. And so I read the Tao by Lao Tzu. And I've basically processed that and put it through my own neural pathway to come up with my interpretation or my viewpoint on it. I think it remains in alignment with the Tao and the spirit of the Tao, but I think it's geared towards today's situation or our environment in that we are living in a satanic matrix.And what I mean by that is the French philosopher, Jean Baudrillard, wrote a book called Simulacra and Simulations. And he basically stated that there would come a point where we're living in this end-stage empire with high technology, end-stage capitalism, where it would be very hard to discern real from the unreal. And everything becomes a simulation and then a simulation of a simulation. And an example of that would be like fake AI video. So for example... let's say they wanted to put a AI generated president of the United States He's brilliant. He's AI. He could answer any question because he has all the whole internet at his disposal.If he's brilliant, he doesn't have a chance in hell for a president.Well, he's brilliant in the sense that he can recall and collect data and gauge demographics, audience responses, poll data, and give the perfect response that people might want to hear.And so that's an extreme version. But there are other things, like if you see a politician doing something bad that may be an enemy of the state, that can be constructed on fake AI video. The point being, we're reaching a point where we don't know what's real and unreal. We're talking to an AI bot in a comment section. How do you know it's human or real, a controlled opposition versus legitimate activist?We're entering the simulation age, and it's hard to ascertain what's the truth. And so...I find the Tao an excellent operating system within the satanic matrix or this simulation that they've created. And by they, I mean international finance, big tech, the Zionist lobby...the deep states, Daesh, Mossad. All these forces that have coalesced that want to suppress humanity are creating this, what Hindus call Maya or illusion.And so the purpose of my book and what I found in my life, what helps me navigate this simulation, is the Tao. (In the book) I just kind of give some of my insights on it and hopefully it'll be helpful to some people.(full transcript available at www.KevinBarrett.substack.com) This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link Donate via Paypal Donate via Spotfund When people suffer unbearable injustice, find no legal recourse, and are censored and silenced when they cry out for justice, they sometimes take the law into their own hands vigilante-style. That, we may suppose, is what happened when United Health Care CEO Brian Thompson was executed in Manhattan by a gunman whose shell casings left the memorable message “depose,” “deny” and “delay,” referring to the common industry tactic of stonewalling payouts.The New York Times, America’s premier defender of institutional injustice, is aghast that Americans are siding with our first-ever folk hero CEO-killer. And NBC is shocked that America’s “internet sleuths” are more interested in helping the killer than catching him.Before social media, such talk would have been confined to bars, cafés and dining room table conversations, while the mainstream mind-control machine would have ignored and/or marginalized it. Today, thanks to the internet, we can see that everybody else is reacting pretty much the same way we are: “Yippee!!!!!! One down, 140 to go!”Now, to echo the immortal words of Richard Nixon, let me be perfectly clear: I have no intention of shooting down Stripe’s scumbag CEO Patrick Collison in the streets of Manhattan, or San Francisco, or anywhere else for that matter…though if he ever shows up here in Saidia, Morocco, I might be tempted to kick his scruffy little Irish-Zionist ass up and down the beach a few times, and finish by using his head as a soccer ball.And if the news suddenly popped up on my laptop screen that Collison perished during one of his pilgrimages to kiss Netanyahu’s tush in Tel Aviv when a Resistance drone equipped with a nuclear weapon had vaporized most of that satanic city, I must admit that I would leap to my feet cheering wildly, then buy the whole café a round of inexpensive non-alcoholic beverages. (One nice thing about Moroccan cafés is that the beverages are inexpensive and non-alcoholic, and the patrons unanimously cheer for the Resistance.)If Collison were to be tragically shot down in, say, downtown San Francisco by another folk hero, here is what the shell casings might look like:If Collison gets shot down it won’t be by me. I have an airtight alibi. I am sitting peacefully in the shade, typing temperately on a laptop, hanging out on the patio with Muse the Cat here in Saidia, Morocco, 6107 miles from San Francisco. As long as I can, I will wage jihad peacefully by way the pen. So let my pen issue a warning to the CEOs: Your class is living on borrowed time. When I was growing up in 1960s and 1970s America, CEOs earned about twenty times the average worker’s salary. Today, they earn 320 times more than their average slave, I mean, employee. Are today’s CEOs sixteen times better? Hardly. More like sixteen times worse. The health insurance industry is a poster child for the evils of America’s oligarchy. It has repeatedly bribed politicians to kill single-payer universal health care and thereby insure its own bloated, parasitical existence. That’s what all oligarchs do: They buy our corrupt government, largely through bribes euphemistically known as “campaign contributions,” to facilitate their larceny.The whole American plutocracy richly deserves a 1789-style fate. And from where I sit, its support for the genocide of Gaza is the icing on the cake. For details, read my recent American Free Press article reproduced below.The needles are knitting away assiduously, spelling out the names of America’s scumbag CEOs. Are handguns with makeshift silencers the new guillotines?-Kevin Barrett, 12/8/24, Saidia, MoroccoIsraeli Torture-Killers Enjoy Impunity…for NowBy Kevin Barrett, for American Free PressIs “Israel” a criminal state? Its prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defense minister Yoav Gallant have been indicted by the International Criminal Court. The charges: war crimes and crimes against humanity. Those charges are a euphemism for genocide.Netanyahu, Gallant, and the Israeli state murdered most of the roughly 600 Israeli civilians who died during the Hamas-led raid on October 7, 2023, then lied outrageously in order to incite their pre-planned genocide of Gaza. (Netanyahu mass-murdered those Israeli civilians with tanks and helicopter gunships by invoking the Hannibal Directive, which calls for killing both hostage takers and hostages in order to avoid having to negotiate their release.)Netanyahu is unrepentant. He called the ICC indictment “antisemitic” and immediately ramped up the genocide.Though the official Gaza death count stood at over 45,000 at the beginning of December 2024, the reality is much worse—at least 200,000 according to Ralph Nader and others, the vast majority women and children. The official count only includes victims who have been positively identified. But countless civilians have been dying slowly beneath the rubble of their homes, and many bodies remain unexcavated.Others are annih

Rumble link Bitchute linkPaul Levy is the author of three books on Wetiko, the “nightmare mind-virus” that feeds on wars and human misery. He argues that once enough of us notice the dreamlike nature of reality, we will be able to collectively attain lucidity and change the dream for the better. Wetiko and related manifestations of evil, he asserts, are there to help wake us up to/in the dream.So why are we dreaming genocide and looming World War III?I got to know Paul after his first book The Madness of George W. Bush struck a chord among some of us in the 9/11 truth movement. Since then, America’s leadership has continued to reflect negative archetypes, with the 2016 and 2024 presidential elections featuring knock-down-drag-out fights between the “bad mother” and “bad father” archetypes. (Paul also had interesting things to say about COVID and how to cure it.)Perhaps many if not most American presidents have been gangsters or near-gangsters. But none have ever been such obvious, shameless gangsters as Biden and Trump. Does the fact that such people assume leadership roles tell us something about ourselves…something we might prefer to ignore, but would be better off acknowledging?from THE MADNESS OF GEORGE W. BUSH: A REFLECTION OF OUR COLLECTIVE PSYCHOSIS (substitute “Trump” for “Bush”)The archetypal role of the negative father that Bush embodies is a figure that exists deep inside of everyone. We’re collectively living out the archetypal myth of the death of the negative patriarchy, which is symbolized by the myth of the old king who is in dire need of transformation. We have all dreamed up the Bush regime to play this out for us so that we can bring consciousness to this part of ourselves. The old king is dissociated from and threatened by Eros, from feeling, from the feminine, from the heart, from relatedness, even from mother nature and the environment (which it objectifies and tries to dominate, instead of being in relationship with), and from love. Concerned about nothing other than itself, this figure is indifferent to other people’s suffering, all the while professing its compassion. It is a true wolf in sheep’s clothing. Another name for the mythic negative father is ME disease. At the root of Bush’s process is an unwillingness and seeming inability to experience his own sense of sin, guilt and shame, as if he is afraid of being exposed, of being found out. He’s clearly unable to feel any remorse and experience his own weakness and vulnerability, his own sense of failure. This threatens his narcissism too much. This inability to experience his shame and guilt sets in motion a self-perpetuating cycle of denial, cover-up and projecting the shadow, all of which are based on a lie. Bush then falls into an endless loop of hiding from his own lie, which is to say, from himself. This process allows Bush to becomes a conduit for egophrenia to take him over and incarnate its malignant aspect through him.\ This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkFirst hour: Velislav Grivov discusses his new article “In Support of Palestinian Armed Resistance Against Israel.” A Bulgarian patriot whose ancestors resisted wars of aggression and colonization by the nominally Muslim Ottoman Empire, Velislav Grivov writes:“Shaitans (Шейтани) is the word the brave and valiant Chechens use. They should know. They fought them in Chechnya and are now fighting the Zion-Nazis in the Ukraine.“And now Shaitans are committing the genocide in Palestine. And in Lebanon. And they have been doing it in Syria, in Libya, in Iraq, in Yemen, in Iran, in Afghanistan…“I really hope that Christians and Muslims, and people from other religions or people that are not religious, Europeans and Arabs, and people in the rest of the world, realize the danger of Satan and Satan’s worshippers and fight back.“The people of the so-called countries of the Axis of the Resistance have been fighting back – the Syrians, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Iranians and of course the unwavering warriors Ansar Allah.” This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com