31 - Buying Stocks is NOT a Zero-Sum Game (Investing First Principle)
The DIY Investing Podcast · Trey Henninger: Private Investor, Portfolio Manager, Business Strategist, and Value Investing Expert
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (pdcn.co) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
- Stocks for the Long Run by Jeremy Siegel:
- Buy on Amazon
- You can support the podcast by making a purchase through the above affiliate link. If you do, I'll earn a small commission at no additional cost to you.
If you enjoyed this podcast and found it helpful, please consider leaving me a review. Your feedback helps me to improve the podcast and grow the show's audience.
Support the Podcast on PatreonThis is a podcast supported by listeners like you. If you'd like to support this podcast and help me to continue creating great investing content, please consider becoming a Patron at DIYInvesting.org/Patron.
You can find out more information by listening to episode 11 of this podcast.
Buying Stocks is NOT a Zero-Sum Game (Investing First Principle) - Show OutlineThe full show notes for this episode are available at https://www.diyinvesting.org/Episode31
Mental Model: Zero-Sum Games- Any gains by one participant must be offset with losses by other participants.
- The sum total of all value for all participants is equal to zero
- Stocks as a whole don't provide a positive expected value
- You don't have to "take" from others in order to receive. When companies create value this is "new value." The economy grows, everyone becomes wealthier.
- The thought is that half of the money must underperform an index, and half of the money can outperform an index. The thought, therefore, is that buying stocks is zero-sum.
- Where is the fallacy?
- Index's have historically had a positive expected value. If an index returns 10%, even if half of the money receives 8%, and half receives 12%, both parties are successful in growing their wealth.
- One party doesn't lose 10% so that the index can grow 10%. That's not how this works.
- Instead, stock ownership is best described as a positive sum game.
- A positive sum game is where the total value received of all participants is greater than zero.
- This means that you can be successful without worrying about the success of others.
- Frees you from the need for comparison, jealousy, or envy.
- Just because someone else made money, doesn't mean you lose money.
- Takeaway: You can ignore index funds and focus on your own personal goals
- Takeaway: You can ignore macroeconomic trends. As long as your fundamental analysis of a company is correct, the broader economic picture is irrelevant.
- Companies are full of employees who go to work each and every day trying to find a way to make your profits grow.
- While this sometimes involves taking market share from other companies, the greatest gains come from innovation, improved efficiencies, new markets, and new products.
- This raises the standard of living for all and the overall economic pie for the economy.