The Dividend Cafe

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3oR1amD Rally day and then some as earnings continue to outperform expectations. Add that to a weaker-than-expected economy (because everyone knows bad news is really good news in Fed-bizarro land), and voila – the Dow goes up over +500 points. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3V6B23f The House Rules Committee voted at 2:20 am to send the House spending legislation to the floor for a vote, implying that Speaker McCarthy has the 218 votes needed to pass a debt ceiling increase that also cuts $4 trillion from government spending over the next ten years. We watch and wait. The Fed Funds Futures have come down to a 77% implied probability of a quarter-point rate hike next week (it had been 93% a couple of days ago). That’s still pretty high and still pretty close to a “sure thing,” but maybe if the First Republic Banks continue that you see in the news, it won’t be a sure thing. That issue is the primary driver of markets right now, today even outweighing what was a pretty solid beat from some big tech companies. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3LESWXT It was sell-off mode today in stocks, with the Dow down -1% and the Nasdaq down -2%, yet it really was the -50% drop today in First Republic stock that seems to be the catalyst for the market turmoil (the drop lower in the broad market that accelerated around 10:00 am PT was just minutes after the acceleration of sell-off in First Republic). Of course, the challenging news there was known all afternoon and night yesterday and all morning today, so it was really a mid-day realization that those problems are not going to be easily resolved (selling assets and raising new equity), and then the broad market has to digest that spill-over effects that could create. Lots more earnings news to come this week. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3oDNT0y Earnings season is off and running and, so far, looks pretty good (or at least not that bad). But it is really early, and the heart of earnings season will be this coming week and next week, and we will keep you posted each step of the way. Dividend Café took a real look inside the inflation story of the last couple of years, particularly the lag effect of shelter. But it did so not merely in how it overstates the CPI now but how it understated it in 2021. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/40qjm3u I enjoyed a wonderful dinner with my long-time friend, John Mauldin, last week, and something we discussed is going to be the subject of today’s Dividend Cafe. John is one of the most well-known newsletter writers in our industry, and I have been reading him every single week – no exceptions – for 23 years. Around ten years ago, after a shared CNBC appearance, he and I became friends and quickly connected the dots that John actually knew my late father and even published some of his writings back in the early 1980s. A small world, indeed. Well, since then, John and I developed a friendship of our own, I am a regular speaker and panelist at his annual Strategic Investment Conference, and we are known to do dinners together that can last for four hours, with all aspects of the economy, the market, the Fed, and the American political system on the table for discussion. At this dinner event last week, John brought something up that inspired me for this week’s Dividend Cafe. You will not be surprised to hear that it is going to involve the Fed, inflation, and all the adjacent topics that so energetically fill the pages of Dividend Cafe quite often. So jump on into the Dividend Cafe … Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3mP5Ad0 The talk is warming up for the debt ceiling debate to become a major market story for a time. As I was writing months ago, there is no leverage for the Republican House if they don’t first pass their own debt ceiling bill (essentially, a bill they actually pass with 218 or more votes that does raise the debt ceiling but gives House Republicans what they want by way of spending cuts). It is what John Boehner first did in 2011 that then forced the Obama administration to have to take a stance against it, and then ultimately pushed that stand-off to the point of the “sequester” where hundreds of billions of dollars came out of the deficit. In this case, I (a) Do not know if Speaker McCarthy will get his 218 votes, (b) Do know that the Biden administration will oppose whatever that is, and (c) Do not know what the twists and turns will be when they find themselves at their version of a “Boehner-Obama” stand-off. I only know this: Without “A” – there is no “B” or “C.” So we shall see if the House GOP can pass a bill and then take it from there. A debt ceiling lift that comes with the spending cuts they want does force the White House into a tougher political play (they can’t see the Republicans are forcing the government to default if the House has actually passed a bill to not do so). But these things have a way of moving and shaking quite a bit before we get to the end, and I can promise you media coverage of it all is going to be … unhelpful. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - Day-to-day bond volatility continues to be quite elevated, and very few are really talking about it. I believe as QT inevitably moves to QE (or at least non-QT), you will see bond volatility come down. Equity volatility already has. 80% of days in January were up or down > 1%, 74% in February, 65% in March, and just 36% so far in April. Hmmmm … I have spoken a lot lately about the American consumer slowing down only when they lose access to credit. Until then, spend spend spend (in fact, the predominant economic philosophy of American policy for the last 75 years has actually sought to intellectually codify this behavior as our patriotic duty). Revolving credit right now is 6.2% of disposable income, not even up to the 6.6% average it was for the last ten years, let alone near the 9% level it averaged in the decade up to the financial crisis. All that to say – debt levels for consumers seem high; debt levels as a percentage of income are not. So my expectation is … spend, spend, spend. Beware of people who tell you, “The consumer is about to crash and burn,” when they have been saying that over and over and over and over again for years. There is an incorrigibility to perma-bears that can only be called dishonest if we don’t see it all for what it is. Also, who cares if people spend a little less and save a little more? Do you really, actually, seriously think that would be a bad thing? Come on. Anyways, another pretty boring day in markets and all the recap is below, along with a great question on commercial real estate and the banking sector. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/40eo9VP I would say, at this point, the market is definitely pricing in yet another rate hike at the next FOMC meeting two weeks from today (futures are up to 87% implied odds). Markets obviously haven’t cared much. Bond yields today didn’t move a lot. Sometimes you have to report what is and not what ought to be, and sometimes what is or what will be is different than what is or what appeared to be just two weeks sooner. Nevertheless, I take it not merely as the Fed likely hiking one more quarter-point in May but the Fed likely cutting more aggressively when they swing the pendulum back the other way. I don’t like any of it, to be honest. The spread between BBB’s and BB’s (low-end investment grade and high-end junk bonds) is a mere 150 basis points – well below the 200 basis points, we have seen a few times in recent months when it looks like credit is about to weaken. Corporate credit has hung in there remarkably well throughout this cycle, for now, despite all the recession talks and doom and gloom of Fed tightening. It almost feels like the Fed can’t be satisfied until they break corporate credit, only, when they do (if they do?), they then will feel like they have to immediately put it back together again, but they can’t put it back together again if they don’t break it first, and I have the distinct impression that is frustrating them. As for what to like within markets, we like dividend growth stocks, always and forever (surprise). But it does seem to me the clear trend for extracting liquidity from the system favors value over growth and less shiny assets than those that have been shining. We shall see. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/40b95Ih Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/4018FUN This is a unique Dividend Cafe but one that I think will have something for everybody. It speaks to a mentality and a framework that has more than just economic ramifications. It was inspired by a conversation I had with my wife on Wednesday night about some other things, and as our conversations often do, led to another track that led to another track that led to this inspiration for Dividend Cafe. At the end of the day, investor behavior will always be the primary determinant of investor outcomes. And investor behavior is deeply tied to how one views the “last dollar on the table.” In fact, even outside of one’s investing life, their view of the “last dollar on the table” is likely to be highly relevant to the outcomes and experiences one will have. One might even argue the “last dollar on the table” is the most expensive dollar one could ever pursue – financially and otherwise. Let’s jump into the Dividend Cafe. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/43GLAdk The markets went into big-time rally mode today and, of course, had already rallied a lot from mid-March levels. The CPI number was quite disinflationary yesterday, as Trevor walked you through in the DC Today, and we saw the disinflationary report in CPI yesterday and now further disinflation in PPI today (producer prices). Headline PPI was down -0.5% on the month when no change was estimated. The core PPI number year-over-year is now +3.4%, down more than 50% from its peak level a year ago. It had been +4.8% YOY just one month ago. But the Headline PPI is now up just +2.7% from a year ago, a massive drop and substantial wholesale disinflation that screams for … A rate hike??? Dear Lord. March 2022 headline PPI: +11.7% March 2023 headline PPI: +2.7% Okay. Don’t get me started. But did the market rally today because it is now even more obvious that the Fed should not be hiking anymore? Well, if so, the Fed Funds Futures aren’t showing it (still 66% implied odds of a quarter-point rate hike). Do markets rally because of what the Fed ought to do or only what the market believes it will do? The former is unlikely last time I checked. Yet markets today clearly said some form of “risk on,” and the reality is that the Fed either gets it or they don’t. The end is near. At least for this rate hike cycle. Credit is contracting. And both stocks and bonds seem to be seeing some form of easier path ahead. Listen or watch today’s comments and check out the Ask David below for the pivotal question about the dollar everyone is asking. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3muBoUs Today was a highly anticipated day, as we were set to get the latest look at inflation data. This data came in lower than expected, which appeased markets at first glance but lost its luster throughout the trading day. Some pointed to the FOMC minutes and the glooming use of the word recession that took the wind out of the market’s sails, yet this was not “new” news (more in the post). Perhaps now, everyone will shift their focus and attention to Friday as we start to gather another season of earnings reports. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3moAxo7 Days like today tend to be pretty boring because stock and bond markets are limited in what they are likely to do a day ahead of a news announcement like tomorrow’s CPI reading. The fed funds futures have a 70% chance right now for a quarter-point rate hike next month, and we will see how markets respond to the CPI tomorrow. In the meantime, I tried to make some stuff up today to keep you interested. =) I’ll put it here instead of down below, but the NFIB Small Business Optimism Index has stayed at a low level in March, February, and January. Now, it hasn’t gone much lower from each of those months, but it has stayed level at a spot that is pretty near where it was ten years ago. Their access to capital (particularly from banks) has dropped substantially, and the confidence one would deduce from hiring plans and capex plans is just not there. It isn’t collapsing, but it isn’t good. The number one issue cited: uncertainty over the economy. It will be interesting to see if the Fed wants to resolve their uncertainty the hard way. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3GAu2FF I hope everyone had a wonderful Easter weekend and are feeling excited for the week ahead. Markets should be pretty weird this week, but now I just say that every week because I have such a high chance of being right when I use the word “weird.” Today didn’t do anything to embarrass me in this prediction (more below). Dividend Cafe last week was my earnest effort to unpack the current state of oil markets and all their economic, geopolitical, and monetary implications Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3Ui1J4z Last weekend’s news was not a Lehman bankruptcy, a Silicon Valley depositor backstop, or a Credit Suisse acquisition. It was not even driven by U.S. forces, let alone the usual cast of characters in the Fed, Treasury, or FDIC. Rather, it was OPEC+ making an announcement of production cuts in oil. It didn’t crash markets – in fact, it caused a big rally in the energy sector. But it is a big deal, and it warrants its own special Dividend Cafe. I would never dare spend a Dividend Cafe pontificating on where the price of oil is going. I do not know, and neither does anyone who trades or tracks oil for a living. Commodity prices are inherently unknowable, and oil is at the top of that list. Getting premises right is no surefire way to the right conclusion, and that applies to oil prices in spades. But what I will spend this Dividend Cafe doing is pleading with you to see the non-oil ramifications of this oil move. And by “this oil move,” I really mean a lot more than “this” oil move – I mean an entire set of events and conditions that, taken together, represent a significant change in global geopolitics and, with that, investment implications. So let’s jump into the Dividend Cafe and digest all that is happening. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/40EOqh5 First of all, congratulations to the Huskies of the great state of Connecticut (where some of TBG’s favorite clients reside) on their NCAA championship. I assure you it was the news story today that deserved the most press coverage. It was a pretty boring day in the market, and all the news wanted to talk about was the Trump court appearance and such. Bonds rallied quite a bit. Stocks had their first down day in a week. The Q&A’s below dig into a key issue of understanding the stress in the banking system right now and a key issue about the Fed. Scroll down if interested. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3ZFg4ZY So congratulations to the San Diego State Aztecs and the UConn Huskies, who will go head to head tonight for the NCAA college basketball championship. It has been a tournament to remember – thrilling upsets and last-second shots – and enough investment lessons to generate a whole Dividend Cafe! The written is here, the video is here, and the podcast here. Yes, a March Madness Dividend Cafe, indeed. I got coaxed into talking about the Trump indictment on Varney Friday, along with some refreshing reminders about investing in the energy sector. You will find a little market review and a little of everything else in this very special Monday edition DC Today, with a whole whole whole lot of ENERGY and OIL in the aftermath of this weekend’s shocking news. Off we go … Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/40OgHkJ Any time I use some sort of sports analogy in the Dividend Cafe I get a lot of emails from people who connect to it and say they love it, and then I get emails saying, “come on, I don’t care about sports – please just stick to the market!” I am never offended or bothered – Abraham Lincoln had a line about pleasing people once – but I am also not swayed. If I think there is a real investment or economic lesson that can be told with a sports analogy, I am going to mix that chocolate and peanut butter. And I promise you, today’s broad takeaway for investors is worth it even for your tortured souls who hate sports. So jump on in to the Dividend Cafe … Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3G3Vdsa So the market went up again today, went negative in the middle of the day, then rallied back in the second half of the day (see chart below). The FDIC is looking to move the cost of the recent bank failures to the banks that didn’t fail (read: to their customers), Sen. Joe Manchin has decided he regrets his support of the “Inflation Reduction Act” atrocity, I wrote of extraordinary bond market volatility two days ago, and then we went two days in a row with bonds frozen in time, and Dr. Anthony Fauci has himself a speaking gig (not sure if it will be virtual or not?). I remain convinced that the key issue adding to profitability in the energy sector going forward is constrained supply, much of which is a decision and some of which is circumstantially forced. Sen. Manchin’s op-ed mentioned above may reflect a sitting U.S. Senator shocked – shocked! – to discover that many do not want to facilitate U.S. energy independence, but it is not a shock at all. And what it does is make the sector even more attractive as it pertains to legacy and incumbent assets, pipelines, and producers. The sector is capital constrained, which boosts expected rates of return for the capital that comes in. It is supply constrained, which boosts prices and margins for the supply that comes online. And it is sentiment constrained, which boosts risk premium around as a contrarian reality. It will ebb and flow, no doubt, but what the opponents of our U.S. energy sector never understand is that all the bad things are actually good things for investors. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3JRB2yV I read an interesting line from an analyst I read daily in my morning research this morning … “if the bulls are to reclaim control of this market, beta likely needs to reassert itself; hasn’t happened yet.” Of course, this sort of begs the question – bulls of what? Well, if one means “the market index,” then they have essentially said, “if those bullish for beta are to get what they want, beta needs to do well.” I think we call that a tautology. “If I am to eat ice cream I like, I will first have to eat ice cream that I like” is not a super profound observation. But I am not picking on this analyst or the comment – I am pointing out the premise hidden in the statement – that a “bull” means the “index” (beta just measures the portion of a return that is really index/market oriented). It highlighted for me how differently we think at TBG – that one can be agnostic about a broad market index (which is neither bullish nor bearish) yet still bullish on an investment strategy that is not remotely connected to beta … Indeed, to that end we work. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3TNPuMZ There are two things I think I have amply covered over the last few weeks: (1) Equity market volatility; and (2) the Bond market rally. Both things are true – equities have been all over the map, up and down, even as they are mostly flat (or actually slightly up) since all this banking commotion began. And bonds are indeed up a great deal, with the 1-year yield down a stunning 75 basis points since this began just three weeks ago and the longer end of the curve itself down 50 basis points. But what is not covered in there is bond market volatility. The swings we have seen in bond yields in the last month are not like anything we have seen since Lehman in 2008. The “VIX” for bonds has elevated beyond what it did during COVID and beyond what it did during the taper tantrum of 2013. This is despite all the quantitative easing that has been done and the general “flight to safety” government bonds represent. Now, much like equities (if not more so), one could argue these “day to day” swings in bond yields (and therefore in bond prices) really do not matter, and that would be true if all we were talking about was the investment return of one holding these underlying government bonds. But I bring it up because I think it speaks to something more than an expected return in a given asset class, but rather a deeper uncertainty, unpredictability, and general directionlessness that is perhaps permeating more than people understand. The policy milieu is not coherent right now, and rip-roaring bond market volatility says so. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3noFOMJ There is a lot today on Housing, which is a matter of practical significance to a lot of you, and there is a lot today on the banking mess and the Fed, which is also connected to Housing. So I think you’ll find today’s missive practical and interesting. After reports throughout the weekend that both First Citizens Bank and Valley National Bank were bidding with the FDIC to take over Silicon Valley Bank (both publicly traded, sub-$10bn market cap banks, the former out of North Carolina and the latter from New Jersey), the Monday morning announcement ended up being that First Citizens Bank would be the buyer. I don’t think the ownership of Silicon Valley Bank’s deposits, loans, brand, and locations is that important to markets overall, with the FDIC having already put unlimited depositor protection in place. The final resolution of their capital markets and securities business is more relevant to us at The Bahnsen Group, for a variety of portfolio-related reasons. And really the final resolution of what will happen with First Republic Bank is the most pressing issue across markets out of the wide array of contenders. Did you know the market closed at 32,254 the day of the Silicon Valley reports on Thursday, March 9, and closed at 32,238 on Friday, March 24, just two weeks later? In between there were ten days of extreme volatility and one day of light volatility, but from the start point to end point, it was dead. flat. in. the. market. And after today markets are UP since this soap opera began. Go figure. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3JF6mRh We are in a moment of “volatile Sundays” in the financial services industry. This is when market actors, policymakers, movers, and shakers have big news to announce on a Sunday in an effort to “beat markets opening”, or as Ben Bernanke once joked that his memoir would be called, “before Asia opens.” I lived through it in spades in 2008 – Fannie and Freddie’s conservatorship, Lehman’s bankruptcy, Wachovia into the arms of Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley’s deal with Mitsubishi, and the government’s extended backstop of Citi – all on different Sunday afternoon/evenings in either September, October, or November of 2008. I can tell you where I was, what I was doing, the exact date, the exact time, and all the things. Good times. The last couple of Sundays have been a little adventurous, but for different reasons and with different catalysts. In a different environment, the news that UBS had done a “rescue acquisition” of Credit Suisse would have been the biggest news story of the entire year. I want to unpack it this week and share some thoughts on where it may be relevant for you, regular U.S. investors presumably with no direct exposure to either UBS or Credit Suisse, who normally just prefer to use your Sundays for church, family, rest, and sports. Let’s jump into the Dividend Cafe! Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3TGllyM That the market gave up -500 points in fifteen minutes at the end of the day yesterday but then rebounded +500 points this morning is, to me, validation of my theory regarding yesterday: that it was a closing speculative trade. Fundamentally, the facts on the table (where they are known) are not really subject to much debate. So an interesting thing happened on the way home from processing the Fed’s announcement yesterday … Math. The Fed is now projecting a +0.4% real GDP growth rate this year, yet a +3.2% growth rate is currently showing in the Atlanta Fed model for Q1 (others have it at +2% and others at +2.5%). Regardless of whether or not Q1 comes in at +2% or +3% (and this always refers to an annualized quarterly number), you can’t get from there to +0.4% on the year without … wait for it … a recession. But the Fed is also showing a projection of no rate cuts this year. And Powell is talking about a credit crunch coming and the financial markets doing their tightening for them. And the first two years of the yield curve are entirely inverted. And the futures market expectation for the 3-month t-bill rate (currently 4.75%) is that in 18 months, it will be below 3.5%. So what should we make of this? Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3TAGcni All that matters today is what the Fed did and said. And what they did was raise rates a quarter point. And what they said was that “financial conditions have tightened” (well, there you go). And he said that these tighter financial conditions and tougher lending criteria from banks will “factor into their policy decisions” (phew). As for a First Republic deal – the bank whose depositors basically now have a backstop from the FDIC but has now seen enough deposit withdrawals to warrant a deal with a bigger back to shore up its capital strength – the issue appears now to be what government backstop or assistance will be a part of any deal (something I predicted last week … any buyer in a position of strength knows the issue is systemic risk, and therefore has the leverage to ask for some sweeteners to come with the deal). Some of the items being discussed (per reports) are liability protection and/or relief on capital requirements and/or other regulatory relaxations. Keep your popcorn handy. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3JvZllP I imagine it is quite likely that the bond market has seen its highs in bond yields for quite some time to come (across the whole yield curve). The 10-year sits at 3.5%, down from 4.21%, and I will be surprised if it gets back up to that level. Likewise, the short end sits at 4.5%, down from over 5%, and I don’t see it getting back there, either. If I am wrong, I am wrong, but I don’t think I am here. China has bought $88 billion in oil, natural gas, and coal from Russia since the war began last year, up over $30 billion from the year prior and causing Russia to beat out Saudi Arabia as China’s leading supplier. The government is evaluating how they can increase FDIC deposit insurance levels above $250,000 without getting Congressional approval. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3LBs0Z8 For the second week in a row, I get to do hours upon hours of reading and writing over the weekend, only to have Sunday interventions make obsolete much of that reading and writing. Keep reading to understand more … There is no question that the major story in markets right now is sort of the only story, and that is the day-to-day perceptions of the banking system at home and abroad. Last week the market was down a hundred points Monday but had been up +350 in the middle of the day. Then Tuesday was up +350 before Wednesday was down -280 (but had been down -700 points). Thursday was then up +375 points, and Friday was down -380 points. So all in, from beginning to end, the market was dead flat on the week. Yep. Dead flat but with substantial movement each and every day. And then, today, we were up +383 points, basically the exact same level as Friday’s downturn. THIS is the type of market where people have a chance to act truly, truly foolish. It is also a prime-time example of directionless volatility. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/42ftwpL In this week’s Dividend Cafe, I again decided not to limit myself to one topic but to take the recent avalanche of questions we have received and go through them all, one by one, creating quite a “multi-topic” Dividend Cafe for you. I think you will find the questions intriguing, and I hope you will find the answers satisfying. From questions about student loans to the Fed to depositor insurance to how to select a wealth advisor, we have it all this week (and then some). Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3JHE8Wf Brian Szytel here with you today reviewing continued market volatility with today’s 700-point swing, albeit today to the upside, surrounding ongoing stress in the financial sector, along with a significant list of new economic data points. I have a full agenda in today’s video podcast link below with updates on employment, manufacturing, interest rates, and a deep dive into what is unfolding in the banking sector and what it may mean for you. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3leNG2y This is Trevor Cummings, and I am sitting in for David Bahnsen to bring you DC Today. There is a common idiom in the English language, “Wait until the dust settles.” This adage encourages one to be patient until they have more clarity. Investors crave clarity, and when things become too foggy or dusty, investor anxieties skyrocket. These anxieties surface as market volatility, which you are currently enduring. At this stage, everyone is still sifting through the rubble of SVB to separate substance from hysteria. I want to encourage you to read David Bahnsen’s special Silicon Valley Bank Dividend Cafe, which was published Monday. Our intent here at The Bahnsen Group is to keep you informed and guide you through the dust. David will even be writing a Dividend Cafe piece on Friday dedicated to the plethora of questions we’ve received this week – you won’t want to miss that. With that said, let’s talk about what happened around the markets today… TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3Td4dAJ ASK DAVID “What do all these things happening with Silicon Valley Bank and the FDIC mean for small and regional banks? Are those banks going to have to pay even more in deposit rates to lure and retain banking customers?” ~ Dave That is certainly a concern, yes – that even with FDIC protection and solvency issues addressed, the smaller banks may be forced to really punish their own margins with punitive levels of interest paid on deposits. I personally believe the next few days are critical to getting a feel for what the aftermath will mean for regional and small banks. I expect there may be a better answer for “super regionals” and a worse answer for “community/small” banks, but both customer sentiment and policy ramifications are still in the TBD phase. Moody’s did put six good-sized regional banks on review for a credit rating downgrade, citing the level of uninsured deposits and mark-to-market losses in their asset portfolios. But at this time, there has been no need for these banks to sell hold-to-maturity assets. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Blogpost - https://bahnsen.co/3mQzT2N There is really only one story in financial markets right now, and that is the collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank and various ramifications from that. We sent a special Dividend Cafe on all of that and more this morning!!! If all you do is read one thing, read that. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Blogpost - https://bahnsen.co/3mK2RRS Today we are going to talk about something no one else seems to be talking about, and that may be one of the worst things imaginable for financial media ratings if it ever gets out. It is not controversial. It is, to me, somewhat obvious. But it is highly counter-cultural, and as I say, for many, it is highly problematic. Jump on into the Dividend Cafe! Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Blogpost - https://bahnsen.co/3YGi43n A big market sell-off again now means the market has gone up 1,000 points and down 1,000 points in the last nine days. And Happy Anniversary (14 years ago today) to the generational market bottom in 2009 out of the Great Financial Crisis! Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's post: https://bahnsen.co/3SXObdT Key Economic Points of the Day: ADP reported 242,000 private sector jobs created in February. The correlation between the ADP and BLS numbers each month has not been very tight for a while now. Job openings came in at 10.82 million for February, 300k higher than expected. It had been 11.2 million last month. The trade deficit came in at $68.3 billion in February, a little less than expected. Total trade was up +7.6% versus last January ($18.1bn), indicating ongoing improvement in supply chain conditions versus a year ago. ASK DAVID “I noticed Sen. Elizabeth Warren grilling Jerome Powell yesterday, and her main point (that the primary causes of inflation and the only tool the fed has to fight inflation are disconnected) sounded familiar. Would you have ever guessed that you would find common ground with a left-wing Senator from Massachusetts? She did have to get price gouging theory in there though …” ~ Jack B. I’ve said this countless times – that though the progressive’s motives are to pin the blame for inflation on “capitalist greed” (the most preposterous theory imaginable), the right’s agenda here will leave them regretting it when economic opponents are the ones making the case that, no, people having jobs is NOT inflationary. Inflation is a highly toxic issue politically, no doubt, and parties not in power will make hay of it when they can just out of political reality. But the need of the hour is economic growth, and for the right to join the fray in alleging that growth and jobs are inflationary is absurd. For Elizabeth Warren to be the one making the case that the Fed is about to do more harm than good is heartbreaking to this movement conservative. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3mrIiJz Key Economic Point of the Day: Futures market completely flip-flopped – went to a 70% chance of a half-point hike at the next meeting, with a 30% chance of a quarter-point hike (had been 30% and 70% just yesterday) ASK DAVID “What do your most recent observations in the city tell you about the state of the New York City office market?” ~ Anthony The fact of the matter is, anyone walking around the 40’s or 50’s (streets) on Tuesday through Thursday can tell offices are not merely 50% occupied in midtown – it is closer to 85% on those days. Where the vacancies lie are in bad and antiquated “old” products. The better quality class B and certainly class A office product is full 3-4 days a week, and tenants are renewing leases. A 10% vacancy rate that has gone to 20% inclusive of ALL NYC office products is really not that bad considering everything that has transpired. If you asked any office landlord 30 months ago if they would be content with the scenario they face now by February 2023, they would have killed for it. The leverage landlords are carrying is case by case, too, but if you all are asking whether or not foot traffic is back, New York City is utterly packed. There are moving parts, no doubt, and a new and class-A product is in the best position. But once again, the death of office, the death of going to work, and yes, the death of New York City, as painfully misdiagnosed. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

I have written about excessive indebtedness many times in these Dividend Cafe pages, including a piece nearly two years ago that I think has held up quite well. Lately I have written about Japanification, which is not quite the same topic (though there is certainly heavy overlap). I have long believed in treating the disease, not the symptoms, and I didn't even go to medical school (in fact, if I had, it seems these days I'd be less likely to believe that). That may be an overused cliche, but it has utility when it comes to how we think about our personal lives, our health, our finances, and so many other things. And when it comes to the issue of Japanification I think the overall subject will be served to look with more granularity at the nature of the excessive debt to which I refer. This is a seriously action-packed Dividend Cafe, and if you do not agree after reading it you are entitled to a full refund of your subscription price. Let's jump in to the Dividend Cafe ... Blog post here: https://bahnsen.co/3KMCDrK Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3ZCSvkX So the market followed its robust January returns with a -4% drop in the Dow for February and a -2.5% drop in the S&P 500, and the bond market dropped -2.7% on the month (though almost every index we track across stock and bond markets was still positive on the year through February, just much less so than previously). A few comments on today’s action here Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Blog post here: https://bahnsen.co/3KW53PY ASK DAVID “In your recent random walk in the Dividend Cafe you mentioned ‘full expensing of all capital expenditures’ as part of your prescription for avoiding Japanification. Will you please explain why this is necessary and what impact it will have?” ~ Luke L. I think one of the major tenets of Japanification is “low/slow/no growth,” and therefore, an obvious antidote (tautologically) is “growth.” I think the testimony of history is a clear and particularly recent experience that in a period of low capital expenditures, which are needed to improve productivity, which is needed to generate growth, removing disincentives to such productive investment is key. Forcing businesses to make large (and risky) investments NOW, but only to deduct that expense over time, is a disincentive. Immediate cash expensing incentivizes capex, which drives productivity, which drives growth. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

This is Trevor Cummings filling in for David Bahsen as he is traveling back to our New York office today. First and foremost, I want to encourage you to check out David’s Dividend Cafe published on Friday. David covered a myriad of topics in a potpourri fashion, and all of these tidbits are what bubble up from actual clients and readers’ questions. Having attended countless number of David’s speaking engagements, the concluding Q&A is always my favorite; the Dividend Cafe this week reminds me a lot of one of those Q&A sessions. Alright, without further ado, let’s jump right into what was happening in Markets today as we close out the month of February. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Well, I am back from my family’s little jaunt through the Bahamian Seas and am grateful to Brian Szytel for filling in with the DC Today for a few days last week. I hope you will find today’s old-school long-form DC Today informative. I will bring you the DC Today from New York on Wednesday and Thursday this week, as well as Dividend Cafe on Friday. Trevor will handle DC Today duties tomorrow as I fly after the market close to the world’s greatest city. Blog post here: https://bahnsen.co/3ksS6me Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

As I am out of the country these last few days with my family on a brief trip as the kids enjoy a week out of school, returning today, I am doing this week’s Dividend Cafe “old school” – which is to say, jumping around topic to topic and answering a handful of questions along the way. I love the “single topic” Dividend Cafe writings each week, but every now and then, it is fun to mix it up a little, especially from a top-secret overseas destination! Let’s jump into the Dividend Cafe … Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Brian Szytel here with you this up day in markets albeit in a choppy 500 point trading range of a session this holiday shortened week. I have some important updated economic numbers, along with comments on currency and real estate you will want to be sure to check out. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Coming off the worst day of the year yesterday we get some market recovery and a little volatility relief with rates coming off yesterdays highs. Today is a more Fed heavy podcast with meeting minutes released which I discuss along with some economic takeaways on the day Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3XR3bLi Good afternoon, Brian Szytel here with you today, helping you navigate in a sea of red ink in today’s trading day. A volatile day with the VIX up big, with much of the narrative revolving around interest rates moving higher across the spectrum, along with mixed earnings and economic data and all of which I fully unpack in today’s video podcast Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Link - https://bahnsen.co/3IxtjXf Since the new calendar year began just about six weeks ago oil prices are basically flat, having started right around $80/barrel and still sitting now right around the same level. The energy sector indices are all up on the year, somewhere around +1%, so nowhere near the level, the market is up year-to-date, but up nicely nonetheless. It's not been a rally mode, but it's not been a sell-off, either. Yet there is a lot going on under the surface. One can be forgiven for being suspicious of the idea that both the commodity side and public equity side can stay flattish and benignly boring for long. My goal in this week's Dividend Cafe is to update our macro perspective on the energy sector and offer some correct practical suggestions around investing in it. It's a little economic, a little political, a little global, and a lot of fun. But you knew that already ... So let's jump into the Dividend Cafe! Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

ASK DAVID “Do you buy this stuff from Larry Lindsey and other economists like him that are worried that financial conditions are good enough that the Fed needs to assume their tightening is ‘not tight enough’? The reasoning seems to be that the Fed should take a message from financial conditions that they need to be tighter. Should the Fed be responding to financial conditions?” ~ L.K. I disagree with Larry Lindsey emphatically on this. It’s inherently contradictory – if the Fed were to try to let financial conditions drive monetary policy, then financial conditions would price (or try to price) how and what the Fed would be reacting to, giving the Fed a constantly moving target. The Fed influences yields and multiples and spreads; to then be influenced by yields, multiples, and spreads is perpetually circular and incoherent. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Link - https://bahnsen.co/3xqUhJS ASK DAVID “If valuation matters at the time of purchase, why would it not matter at the time of reinvestment of dividends from that same company purchased?” ~ Steve The simple answer is – it does, and if we felt a company’s valuation was so excessive that we didn’t want dividends reinvested in that company, why would we want to own the company at all? So the question about reinvestment always answers itself. If a dividend shouldn’t be reinvested in the company issuing it, it shouldn’t be owned at all. We apply the SAME criteria to holding a stock that we do buying it – that is, valuation sensitivity and risk/reward prudence. Now, why would we potentially reject a stock at $225/share, buy it at $150/share, and then still keep it when it is back above $200/share? Is it a matter of just liking it differently now versus when it was first at $225? Less subjectively than that, the entry yield was likely different, the free cash flow projections were likely different, the buffer of safety was different, management forecasts of dividend growth were likely different, and where the company or economic cycle stood was likely different. So criteria always include different inputs and points of emphasis and focus at different times and therefore at different prices. A company can be at 20x earnings and $100/share, and then 10x earnings and $200/share. Valuation, not price, always and forever. But along with valuation are Free Cash Flow, growth rates, dividend yield, capex expectations, and much more. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Link: https://bahnsen.co/3E7qE3V The CPI number for the month of January came in at +0.4% for core inflation and +0.5% for headline inflation, exactly in line with expectations. The year-over-year number is down to 6.4%, vs. the high of 9.1% last summer, and less than last month’s 6.5%. This represents seven months in a row of a declining inflation rate. Core goods have now deflated by 4.8% on an annualized basis over the last four months. The deflationary drag of core goods will wear off in the months ahead as the year-over-year comparison wanes (lower comparative number, otherwise known as base effect). Shipping Costs from China are down -90% from a year ago and it seems some people just want to act like that is a small factor in all of this (or prices being 10x higher than they are now was a small factor in the previous goods inflation). I remain mystified by this willful blindness. “Owner’s Equivalent Rent” was up +0.7% on the month and 7.8% on the year. Uh-huh. The disinflationary impact from shelter is expected to become visible in the data from March through the end of the year (last March people were still signing leases higher than those the month before, but by spring the rents peaked and then downward pressure began in earnest in the second half of the year, so that gets picked up in year-over-year numbers this year). I believe the impact of this will be worth three full percentage points to headline CPI by the end of the year (meaning, shaving three points off). Some other analyst estimates have it between 2.5% and 2.8% of a downward impact. The new category of “super-core” inflation – that is, inflation on that which is left when you exclude food, energy, and housing, is sticking around 4% right now. Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com

Today's Link: https://bahnsen.co/3HXUEAl A rally day in the markets, telling you exactly what the markets think about the theory of extra-terrestrial attacks from UFOs… More below! Dividend Cafe took a stab Friday at applying our present economic outlook (short-term and long-term) to the logic of dividend growth investing. Off we go … Market Action Futures opened down -70 points last night just as the Super Bowl was kicking off so I figure anyone trading futures at that time was a weirdo. By bedtime, they were down over a hundred points, and at wake-up, they were basically flat. The market opened up by +75 points and rallied higher throughout the day. The Dow closed up +377 points (+1.11%) with the S&P 500 up +1.14% and the Nasdaq up +1.48%. With almost 70% of the earnings season now complete we are tracking 5% year-over-year sales growth and a year-over-year earnings decline of -2.8%. Full-year earnings estimates continue to sit at $224/share from the S&P 500. An interesting summary from Strategas Research comparing both economic data and market data now to the same in September of last year (so five months ago). All market indices are higher. Gas prices are lower. Inflation is lower. Oil prices and long-term bond yields are essentially the same. Unemployment has stayed very low. S&P earnings estimates are lower and the fed funds terminal rate is higher. When you add it all up, markets do not believe the fed funds terminal rate and short-term upper range is going to hold. The ten-year bond yield closed today at 3.70%, down four basis points on the day. Top-performing sector for the day: Technology (+1.77%) Bottom-performing sector for the day: Energy (-0.60%) Links mentioned in this episode: TheDCToday.com DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com