May 14, 1996: Moon Debate - Richard C. Hoagland & Dr. Edgar Mitchell
The Art Bell Archive · Arthur William Bell III
June 19, 20231h 24m
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (archive.org) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
Richard C. Hoagland and Apollo 14 astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell go head to head in a live debate over whether ancient glass structures exist on the lunar surface. Hoagland presents enhanced Apollo 14 photographs showing geometric brightening and scattering patterns above the lunar horizon, which he argues are consistent with the remains of enormous, deteriorated glass domes stretching tens of miles across the Moon's surface.
Mitchell pushes back firmly but thoughtfully, acknowledging that photographic anomalies may exist while insisting Hoagland is pushing his data far beyond what it supports. The astronaut argues the evidence more likely reflects optical artifacts or unknown physics rather than artificial construction. He challenges Hoagland on how six Apollo missions could have descended through such structures unharmed. The discussion extends into lunar seismic data, NASA classification authority under the Space Act, and the Brookings Report's recommendation to potentially withhold evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence.
What emerges is a surprisingly respectful exchange between two sharp minds approaching the same data from radically different frameworks. By the broadcast's end, Mitchell agrees to assist with further investigation, and both men find unexpected common ground on the need to pursue anomalous evidence wherever it leads.
Mitchell pushes back firmly but thoughtfully, acknowledging that photographic anomalies may exist while insisting Hoagland is pushing his data far beyond what it supports. The astronaut argues the evidence more likely reflects optical artifacts or unknown physics rather than artificial construction. He challenges Hoagland on how six Apollo missions could have descended through such structures unharmed. The discussion extends into lunar seismic data, NASA classification authority under the Space Act, and the Brookings Report's recommendation to potentially withhold evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence.
What emerges is a surprisingly respectful exchange between two sharp minds approaching the same data from radically different frameworks. By the broadcast's end, Mitchell agrees to assist with further investigation, and both men find unexpected common ground on the need to pursue anomalous evidence wherever it leads.