June 6, 1996: OJ Simpson Investigation - Gerald Uelmen
The Art Bell Archive · Arthur William Bell III
June 22, 20232h 55m
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (archive.org) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
Professor Gerald Uelmen, a key member of O.J. Simpson's legal defense team, joins Art Bell fresh off his book tour for "Lessons from the Trial." As both a practicing attorney and law professor, Uelmen offers a unique insider perspective on the trial of the century, explaining how television viewers saw a fundamentally different case than the jury experienced in the courtroom.
Uelmen reveals that the defense team fully intended to put Simpson on the stand, as Johnny Cochran's opening statement suggested, but reconsidered when they realized cross-examination would shift focus to the prior relationship rather than the events of June 12th. He discusses the suspicious blood evidence on the back gate, the famous glove demonstration, and takes credit for contributing the iconic line to Cochran's closing argument. The professor maintains his conviction in Simpson's innocence based on his personal assessment of the man.
The conversation broadens into deeper questions about equal justice, the role of wealth in legal defense, and the dangers of televised trials. Art then opens the lines for a wide-ranging discussion touching on the Alaska wildfire crisis, church burnings, and the so-called demon seeds from a listener in Seattle.
Uelmen reveals that the defense team fully intended to put Simpson on the stand, as Johnny Cochran's opening statement suggested, but reconsidered when they realized cross-examination would shift focus to the prior relationship rather than the events of June 12th. He discusses the suspicious blood evidence on the back gate, the famous glove demonstration, and takes credit for contributing the iconic line to Cochran's closing argument. The professor maintains his conviction in Simpson's innocence based on his personal assessment of the man.
The conversation broadens into deeper questions about equal justice, the role of wealth in legal defense, and the dangers of televised trials. Art then opens the lines for a wide-ranging discussion touching on the Alaska wildfire crisis, church burnings, and the so-called demon seeds from a listener in Seattle.