Tech Talks Daily

Have you ever contacted customer support with a simple request, only to find yourself trapped in a loop of scripted chatbot responses that never actually solve the problem? It's an experience many of us know all too well. AI has made customer service more conversational over the last few years, yet there is still a gap between answering a question and actually resolving an issue. That gap is exactly where today's conversation begins. In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I spoke with Mike Szilagyi, SVP and General Manager of Product Management at Genesys Cloud, about a new chapter in AI-powered customer experience. Genesys has announced what it describes as the industry's first agentic virtual agent built on Large Action Models, or LAMs. While Large Language Models have dominated the conversation around AI for the past few years, they have largely focused on generating responses, retrieving knowledge, or answering questions. What they have struggled with is execution. Mike explained how Large Action Models take the next step. Rather than simply telling a customer how to solve a problem, these systems can plan and execute the steps needed to complete a task. Imagine contacting an airline after a sudden flight cancellation. Instead of navigating multiple menus or repeating information to a human agent, an agentic virtual assistant could understand your situation, check alternative flights, apply airline policies, and complete the rebooking process across several systems. In other words, the AI moves from conversation to action. We also explored how Genesys approached the design of this technology with enterprise governance in mind. From explainable decision paths and audit logs to guardrails that ensure every automated action can be traced and understood, the goal is to make autonomous AI trustworthy inside complex organizations. Mike also shared insights into Genesys' partnership with Scaled Cognition and how integrating specialized models helps deliver reliable execution in real-world customer service environments. Perhaps most interesting was our discussion about the human role in this evolving contact center landscape. As automation begins to handle routine and multi-step workflows, human agents are free to focus on situations that require empathy, judgment, and expertise. That shift raises interesting questions about how organizations design customer experiences in the years ahead. So how will customers respond when virtual agents move beyond answering questions and begin resolving problems on their behalf? And once one brand delivers that experience, will it quickly become the expectation? Useful Links Connect with Mike Szilagyi Learn more about Genesys Genesys Agentic Virtual Agent Powered by LAMs for Enterprise CX Follow on LinkedIn

*]:pointer-events-auto scroll-mt-(--header-height)" dir="auto" tabindex="-1" data-turn-id= "616a78a9-936c-48a2-92f7-e1bbd7029cf6" data-testid= "conversation-turn-1" data-scroll-anchor="false" data-turn="user"> *]:pointer-events-auto scroll-mt-[calc(var(--header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" dir="auto" tabindex="-1" data-turn-id= "request-WEB:6d125332-007b-4d80-9352-ebefa0828121-0" data-testid= "conversation-turn-2" data-scroll-anchor="true" data-turn= "assistant"> How do global companies make confident decisions when supply chains are constantly disrupted by tariffs, geopolitical tension, shifting consumer demand, and unpredictable global events? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I sat down with Dr. Ashwin Rao, EVP of AI and R&D at o9 Solutions, to talk about how artificial intelligence is changing the way organizations plan, forecast, and respond to uncertainty. Ashwin brings a fascinating mix of experience to the conversation. After earning a PhD in mathematics and computer science, he spent fifteen years on Wall Street working on derivatives trading strategies at Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley before moving into the world of enterprise technology. Today, he operates at the meeting point between business and academia as both a senior AI leader and an adjunct professor at Stanford University. Our conversation begins with Ashwin's unusual career path and how those early experiences in finance shaped the way he thinks about risk, decision making, and real world AI deployment. The journey from theoretical mathematics to trading floors and eventually into Silicon Valley offers an interesting lens on how analytical thinking can travel across industries and still remain highly relevant. We then move into the work happening at o9 Solutions, where AI is helping organizations make smarter decisions across supply chain planning, demand forecasting, and inventory management. In a world that Ashwin describes using the acronym VUCA, volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity, businesses are under pressure to react faster and make better informed decisions. He explains how enterprise AI platforms can connect fragmented data across departments and create a more complete view of the business. One example he shares brings the concept down to earth. Even predicting how many bananas a grocery store should stock on any given day requires analyzing internal sales trends alongside external signals such as weather, social media trends, and economic conditions. Machine learning systems can now process those signals in real time and continuously update forecasts so businesses can respond quickly to changes. We also explore the rise of neuro- and symbolic AI, a concept Ashwin believes represents the next stage in enterprise decision-making. Rather than relying only on large language models, this approach blends the structured reasoning of symbolic systems with the pattern recognition of neural networks. The result, he suggests, feels less like a chatbot and more like having an expert coach embedded inside the decision-making process. Along the way, we also discuss why many organizations still struggle to embed AI successfully. Technology is only one piece of the puzzle. Ashwin believes the toughest obstacle is organizational change management, bringing teams together, connecting data across silos, and helping leaders guide their organizations through transformation. If you have ever wondered how AI moves beyond chatbots and into the systems that quietly power global supply chains, this conversation offers a thoughtful and practical perspective. So, how prepared is your organization to make decisions in a world defined by volatility and uncertainty, and could AI become the trusted partner that helps guide those choices? Useful Links Ashwin's blog Ashwin's LinkedIn o9 Solutions Website o9 LinkedIn

What does it take to design a data center for a world where the technology inside it may change several times before the building even opens? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I sit down with Jackson Metcalf, Principal at Gensler, to talk about how AI is forcing a complete rethink of data center design. Jackson has spent nearly two decades working on critical facilities, and in our conversation he explains how the shift from traditional cloud workloads to dense AI environments is changing everything from building form and cooling strategy to long-term infrastructure planning. What struck me most in this conversation is the sheer mismatch in timescales. Data centers can take two and a half to three years to design and build, while chip and GPU roadmaps are evolving in cycles of months. Jackson explains why that means designing for a fixed end state no longer makes sense. Instead, the future may belong to facilities built with flexibility at their core, spaces that can be reconfigured, upgraded, and even conceptually rebuilt over time rather than treated as static assets. We also talk about what hyper-flexibility actually means in practice. This is not just a buzzword. It is about designing buildings with enough structural and engineering headroom to support very different cooling and power models over their lifespan. As AI workloads push cabinet densities to levels that would have sounded impossible only a few years ago, the need for plug-and-play mechanical and electrical infrastructure becomes far more than a design preference. It becomes essential. Another fascinating part of the conversation centers on sustainability. Jackson shares why durable, well-built structures can create long-term environmental value, even in an industry often criticized for its energy demands. We discuss embodied carbon, adaptive reuse, and why a high-quality building may have a much better second life than something built purely for short-term speed. That leads into a wider conversation about repositioning underused real estate, from former industrial facilities to vacant office buildings, as potential digital infrastructure. We also get into the growing energy challenge behind AI. With demand for power rising fast, and the US grid under increasing pressure, many operators are now weighing options such as on-site natural gas generation while waiting for cleaner long-term alternatives to mature. Jackson offers a thoughtful perspective on the tension between urgent infrastructure needs and environmental responsibility, as well as the uncertainty surrounding future energy roadmaps. Looking further ahead, I ask Jackson what will define a successful data center campus in the years to come. Will it be raw megawatts, adaptability, carbon intensity, location strategy, or something else entirely? His answer opens up a much bigger conversation about whether these buildings can become more connected to the communities around them, and what role they may play in a future where digital infrastructure is no longer hidden in the background, but central to how society functions. So if AI is pushing data center design to extremes, how do we build facilities that are ready for what comes next without becoming obsolete almost as soon as they open? And what does sustainable, adaptable digital infrastructure really look like in practice?

How close are we to the moment when quantum computing moves from scientific curiosity to real-world infrastructure? In today's episode of Tech Talks Daily, I speak with Christian Weedbrook, Founder and CEO of Xanadu, a company pushing the boundaries of what quantum computers might soon achieve. Xanadu has taken an unconventional route in the race to build practical quantum systems. Instead of relying on electronic approaches used by many others in the field, the company builds quantum computers using photonics, effectively computing with particles of light. Christian explains why this matters and how working with photons could unlock advantages in energy efficiency, scalability, and networking as quantum machines grow into large data center–scale systems. The conversation also arrives at a fascinating moment for the company. Xanadu has announced plans to go public through a SPAC deal that values the company at around $3.1 billion. Christian shares what that milestone means, not only for Xanadu but for the broader quantum ecosystem. According to him, the excitement surrounding quantum computing is no longer limited to research labs. Governments, enterprise partners, and investors are increasingly paying attention as the technology edges closer to commercial relevance. One of the most engaging parts of our conversation is Christian's own journey into the world of quantum physics. Before earning a PhD in photonic quantum computing, he began as a film student who admits he once dreamed of becoming a filmmaker. That winding path eventually led him into physics and entrepreneurship, where he founded Xanadu in 2016 with a mission to make quantum computers useful and accessible to everyone. We also discuss PennyLane, the open-source quantum programming framework developed by Xanadu that has quietly become one of the most widely used tools in the quantum developer community. Now taught in universities across more than 30 countries, PennyLane plays an important role in building the next generation of quantum talent. Christian also shares a realistic timeline for where the industry stands today. Quantum computers already exist, but they remain smaller than what is needed for commercial breakthroughs. Xanadu's roadmap points toward large-scale quantum data centers by the end of the decade, systems capable of tackling problems in drug discovery, materials science, logistics, and finance that traditional computers struggle to simulate. For enterprise leaders listening today, the message is clear. The quantum future is closer than many people assume, and organizations that begin exploring use cases now will be far better prepared when these systems mature. So how should businesses prepare for a computing paradigm based on the mathematics of quantum physics rather than traditional software logic? And what lessons can founders learn from a journey that began with filmmaking ambitions and led to building one of the most ambitious quantum companies in the world? Let's find out together.

How should businesses rethink infrastructure when applications, data, and users are increasingly spread across thousands of locations? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I sit down with Mark Cree, President and Chief Operating Officer at Scale Computing, to talk about why the future of enterprise infrastructure is moving closer to where data is actually created. This conversation was recorded following the 66th edition of The IT Press Tour, where some of the most interesting conversations in enterprise infrastructure centered on what happens when businesses move away from oversized, monolithic stacks and start focusing on practical, distributed solutions. From retail stores and airports to remote industrial sites, the edge is becoming a critical part of modern IT strategy. Mark shares how Scale Computing has spent years building an edge-first platform designed to run critical workloads reliably across everything from a single location to tens of thousands of distributed sites. Mark also reflects on his own journey through the technology industry, which includes founding companies acquired by Cisco and NetApp, working as a venture capitalist, and leading major storage initiatives at AWS. That experience gives him a unique perspective on how enterprise infrastructure has evolved, particularly as organizations reconsider the balance between centralized cloud environments and local processing closer to users and devices. During our conversation, we explore why edge computing is becoming increasingly important for AI workloads, especially when large volumes of data are generated outside traditional data centers. Mark explains how processing information locally can reduce costs, improve performance, and enable entirely new use cases, from monitoring customer behavior in retail environments to running intelligent systems in remote locations. We also talk about the ongoing reassessment happening across enterprise IT teams following major industry shifts, including changes in the virtualization market and growing concerns around vendor lock-in. Mark explains how Scale Computing is positioning itself as a flexible alternative by combining virtualization, containerization, networking, and security into a platform designed specifically for distributed environments. Looking ahead, Mark shares his perspective on where enterprise infrastructure is heading over the next five years. As smaller AI models become more capable and organizations seek greater control over their data and systems, the role of edge platforms may become even more important. Instead of relying solely on massive centralized environments, companies may find new value in distributing intelligence closer to the places where real-world activity happens. So as organizations rethink how they deploy applications, manage data, and control infrastructure, is the next big shift in enterprise IT happening right at the edge? And how prepared is your organization for that change?

How can companies invest heavily in AI and still struggle to see meaningful returns? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I sit down with Thomas Scott, CEO of Wrike, to unpack a growing tension many organizations are facing right now. Artificial intelligence adoption is accelerating rapidly across the workplace, yet the structures needed to support it are struggling to keep pace. Wrike's latest research into the "Age of Connected Intelligence" reveals that more than 80 percent of employees are already using AI at work. Yet fewer than half have received any formal training, guidance, or governance around how these tools should be used. That gap between enthusiasm and enablement is creating a new workplace phenomenon that many leaders are only just beginning to notice. Shadow AI. When employees cannot find approved tools that solve their problems quickly, they often turn to unapproved applications or personal accounts instead. Wrike's data shows that 42 percent of workers admit they have already done this. For organizations handling sensitive data, intellectual property, or regulated information, that trend raises serious questions about security, compliance, and trust. Thomas explains why this pattern is not surprising. Whenever a new technology emerges, the builders and experimenters move first. They explore possibilities, test new tools, and discover productivity gains long before formal policies or training frameworks arrive. The challenge for leadership teams is learning how to harness that momentum without letting experimentation turn into fragmentation. We also explore one of the most overlooked barriers to AI return on investment. Integration. Many employees are now juggling multiple AI tools every week, yet those systems rarely communicate with one another or connect deeply into the core business platforms where real work happens. As a result, context gets lost, workflows become fragmented, and organizations end up running expensive pilots that never scale into meaningful transformation. Thomas introduces the idea of connected intelligence as a possible solution. Instead of deploying AI tools in isolation, companies need systems that understand context across projects, teams, and workflows. When AI can access structured data, shared history, and operational context, it becomes far more capable of supporting real decision making rather than simply generating isolated outputs. Our conversation also explores how leaders can move beyond scattered experimentation and start building structured AI adoption across their organizations. Thomas argues that the most successful companies start with highly specific problems, empower small groups of motivated builders, and maintain strong executive involvement throughout the process. AI transformation is rarely driven by technology alone. It requires people, process, and leadership alignment working together. So if your organization has already deployed AI tools but still struggles to see real impact, perhaps the question is not whether you are using AI. The real question might be whether those tools are truly connected to the work your teams are trying to do every day.

How can organizations use AI to transform hiring while still protecting the human element at the heart of work? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I sit down with Mahe Bayireddi, co-founder and CEO of Phenom, to explore how artificial intelligence is reshaping the way companies attract, hire, and develop talent. Our conversation comes at an interesting moment for the company, following the announcement that Phenom has acquired Be Applied, an AI-driven cognitive assessment platform designed to validate candidate and employee capabilities at scale. The move follows an earlier acquisition of Included, an AI-native people analytics platform focused on delivering deeper workforce insights and faster decision making. Mahe shares how Phenom's long-term mission to help a billion people find the right job is evolving as AI becomes embedded throughout the HR lifecycle. From candidate discovery to onboarding and internal mobility, organizations are now experimenting with automation, personalization, and intelligent workflows that aim to improve both productivity and employee experience. One theme that runs throughout our discussion is how AI adoption in HR varies dramatically depending on geography, regulation, and industry. In Europe, regulatory frameworks are shaping how companies deploy automation. In the United States, state-level policies introduce additional complexity. Meanwhile, organizations across Asia are often approaching AI with entirely different priorities. As a result, many global companies are experimenting carefully, introducing AI into specific business units or regions before rolling it out more broadly. We also talk about a challenge that has caught many HR teams by surprise: the growing issue of fraudulent candidates and identity manipulation in the hiring process. As job applications become easier to submit and remote work expands global talent pools, organizations must rethink how they validate candidate identity and credentials. Mahe explains how AI-driven fraud detection tools can help highlight suspicious patterns while still keeping humans in the loop for final decisions. Another important point raised in the conversation is the need to preserve humanity in the workplace while introducing intelligent automation. While AI can dramatically improve efficiency across recruiting and workforce planning, Mahe believes HR leaders must be careful to ensure technology strengthens human potential rather than reducing people to data points in a system. Looking ahead, we discuss how organizations can begin adopting AI responsibly by starting small, focusing on high-impact areas, and building guardrails that reflect regional regulations and company culture. For many companies, the most successful path forward will involve testing AI within specific workflows, measuring outcomes quickly, and scaling what works. So as artificial intelligence becomes a central part of hiring, workforce planning, and employee development, the big question for leaders is this. Can organizations use AI to create faster, smarter talent decisions while still keeping people at the center of the workplace experience?

How does a CISO turn cybersecurity from a technical conversation into a business conversation that boards actually care about? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I sit down with Thom Langford, EMEA CTO at Rapid7 and a former CISO, to explore what he calls the second phase of cybersecurity leadership. For years, the industry worked hard to secure a seat at the boardroom table. In many organizations, that mission has largely succeeded. But as Thom explains, gaining access was only the first step. The real challenge now is communicating security in a way that drives meaningful business decisions. Thom shares why many CISOs still approach board conversations in the same way they did a decade ago, even though boardroom awareness of cybersecurity has changed dramatically. Today, many boards include members with cybersecurity knowledge or direct security experience. That means security leaders can no longer rely on technical jargon, complex frameworks, or compliance language to make their case. One of the most interesting insights from our conversation is the disconnect between how CISOs frame risk and what boards are actually focused on. While security teams often lead with risk reduction, boards tend to think in terms of revenue growth and operational costs. Thom argues that security leaders must learn to translate cybersecurity into the language of profit and loss if they want their message to resonate at the executive level. We also explore how traditional security tools such as risk frameworks, audits, and compliance standards can sometimes create distance rather than clarity in board discussions. Instead of helping executives understand security priorities, these models can obscure the real question boards are trying to answer. How secure are we, and what does that mean for the business? Another area we discuss is the growing role of tabletop exercises. Thom explains why these simulations are becoming one of the most effective ways for CISOs to demonstrate the real-world impact of security decisions. By walking executives through a realistic incident scenario, leaders can see how security, operations, legal teams, and business priorities intersect during a crisis. Looking ahead, Thom believes the most successful CISOs will increasingly need to think like business leaders rather than purely technical specialists. Communication skills, relationship building, and understanding the organization's financial priorities may prove just as important as deep technical expertise. So if cybersecurity leaders have already earned their place in the boardroom, the next question becomes much more interesting. Are they speaking the language the board actually understands, or are they still trying to solve business problems using only security vocabulary?

What if the next big shift in personal audio is not about blocking the world out, but staying connected to it? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I sit down with Nicole from Shokz to talk about why open-ear headphones are suddenly everywhere, and why this category is moving from niche curiosity to everyday essential. For years, the audio market was obsessed with sealing users off from the outside world. Now the conversation is changing. More people want to hear their music, podcasts, and calls without losing awareness of traffic, fellow commuters, colleagues, or the world happening around them. Nicole helps unpack what open-ear audio actually means in simple terms, and why it is resonating with runners, commuters, parents, office workers, and anyone trying to balance comfort, safety, and sound quality. We talk about the cultural shift behind this rise, from growing health and fitness habits to the way hybrid work and always-on lifestyles have changed how people use earbuds throughout the day. We also get into why Shokz has become one of the defining brands in this space. Long before open-ear audio became a trend, Shokz was investing in bone conduction, open-ear design, and the kind of product research needed to make this category work in real life. Nicole shares how years of persistence, technical innovation, and consumer education helped the company move from specialist player to category leader. During our conversation, we explore how real-world behavior shapes product design. That means thinking beyond audio specs and focusing on how headphones actually fit into daily life. Whether someone is running in the rain, commuting to work, wearing glasses, sitting in an office, or trying to stay aware while walking the dog, those everyday moments are shaping the next generation of audio devices. Nicole also talks me through some of Shokz's latest product thinking, including the OpenDots One and the OpenFit Pro. From compact clip-on designs that feel almost like wearable accessories to new approaches around noise reduction in open-ear listening, this episode looks at how the category is becoming more sophisticated and more versatile without losing the awareness that made it appealing in the first place. Looking ahead, we discuss whether open-ear audio will live alongside sealed earbuds as part of a two-device lifestyle, or whether it could eventually become the default choice for more people. We also touch on what comes next, from smarter audio experiences to the role AI and even connected glasses could play in the future of listening. So if you have been seeing the phrase open-ear audio more often and wondering what all the fuss is about, this conversation will bring it to life. Are open-ear headphones simply having a moment, or are we watching a bigger shift in how people want to hear the world around them?

What happens when the real bottleneck in artificial intelligence is no longer training models, but actually running them at scale? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I sit down with Satyam Srivastava from d-Matrix to explore a shift that is quietly reshaping the entire AI infrastructure landscape. While much of the early AI race focused on training ever larger models, the next phase of AI adoption is increasingly defined by inference. That is the moment when trained models are deployed and used to generate real-world results millions of times a day. Satyam brings a unique perspective shaped by years of experience in signal processing, machine learning, and hardware architecture, including time spent at NVIDIA and Intel working on graphics, media technologies, and AI systems. Now at d-Matrix, he is helping design next-generation computing architectures focused on one of the biggest challenges facing the AI industry today: efficiently running large language models without overwhelming data centers with unsustainable power and infrastructure demands. During our conversation, we explored why the industry underestimated the infrastructure implications of inference at scale. While training large models grabs headlines, the real operational pressure often comes later when those models must serve millions of queries in real time. That shift places enormous strain on memory bandwidth, energy consumption, and data movement inside modern data centers. Satyam explains how d-Matrix identified this challenge years before generative AI exploded into the mainstream. Instead of focusing on training hardware like many AI startups at the time, the company concentrated on inference efficiency. That decision is becoming increasingly relevant as organizations begin to realize that simply adding more GPUs to data centers is not a sustainable long-term strategy. We also discuss the growing power constraints surrounding AI infrastructure, and why efficiency-driven design may be the only realistic path forward. With electricity supply, cooling capacity, and semiconductor availability all becoming limiting factors, the industry is being forced to rethink how AI systems are architected. Custom silicon, purpose-built accelerators, and heterogeneous computing environments are now emerging as key pieces of the puzzle. The conversation also touches on the geopolitical and economic importance of AI semiconductor leadership, and why the relationship between frontier AI labs, infrastructure providers, and chip designers is becoming increasingly strategic. As governments and companies compete to maintain technological leadership, the question of who controls the hardware powering AI may prove just as important as the models themselves. Looking ahead, Satyam shares his perspective on how the role of engineers will evolve as AI infrastructure becomes more specialized and energy-aware. Foundational engineering skills remain essential, but the next generation of engineers will also need to think in terms of entire systems, combining software, hardware, and AI tools to build more efficient computing environments. As AI continues to move from research labs into everyday products and services, are organizations prepared for the infrastructure shift that comes with an inference-driven future? And could efficiency, rather than raw computing power, become the defining metric of the next phase of the AI race?

Have you noticed how every week brings a new headline about AI driven fraud, yet it still feels hard to tell what is real risk and what is noise? In this Tech Talks Daily episode, I'm joined by Tommy Nicholas, CEO of Alloy, for a candid conversation that cuts through the fear driven commentary and gets into what fraud teams are actually dealing with right now. We start with a simple but important distinction that gets blurred all the time. Tommy separates classic "fraud," where institutions take the hit, from "scams," where individuals are manipulated into handing over money or access. That framing changes how you think about solutions, accountability, and where AI is making things worse. Tommy also shares why he believes fraud losses are often massively underreported. It is not because people are trying to hide the truth, it is because organizations rarely have a single, clean view of losses across every product line and channel. Add messy labeling, split ownership across teams, and reporting becomes a best effort estimate rather than an objective number. That reality matters if you're building board level narratives, budgets, or risk models on top of survey data. From there, we talk about what organizations are getting right. Tommy argues there is no magical "undetectable" attack that forces teams to give up, but there is a very real breakdown happening in old fallbacks, especially human review of images and video. The bigger shift he sees is banks and fintechs finally pushing for consistent tooling across every channel, web, mobile, branch, call center, support tickets, because fraud does not respect internal org charts. We then get into why Alloy's AI Assistant is an interesting signal for where agentic AI is heading in regulated work. Tommy explains that agents are only useful when they have rigorous context, strong sources of truth, and clear workflows. Otherwise they guess, and "looks good" is not the same as "safe to run in production." He also lays out where agents can genuinely outperform humans, like scaling investigations during sudden surges, while keeping processes auditable and repeatable. We close by looking ahead at agentic commerce, and why Tommy thinks the breakt hrough will arrive through weird, emergent behavior rather than a neat protocol roll out. When you listen back, do you think the next big leap in fraud prevention will come from better models, better data, or better operational discipline, and what would you bet on if your own customers were the ones on the line?

Have you ever bought a ticket to a show and wondered why the experience still feels strangely disconnected, with one app for ticketing, another for marketing, another for refunds, and a dozen spreadsheets held together by late nights and good intentions? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I'm joined by Ritesh Patel, co-founder of Ticket Fairy, to talk about the technology behind live events and why it has lagged behind other industries in some surprisingly familiar ways. Ritesh makes the case that most organizers are operating more like creative founders than corporate operators, building "mini cities" for a weekend with tiny teams, tight budgets, and very little margin for error. That reality shapes every technology decision, and it explains why fragmented tools and siloed data can become a hidden tax on the business. Ritesh walks me through Ticket Fairy's full stack approach, bringing ticketing, marketing, CRM, logistics, and payments into a single system, and why unifying data changes the economics of running an event. We dig into practical examples that go beyond vague AI talk, including how small workflow fixes can speed up entry, improve the on-site experience, and even translate into real revenue uplift once you multiply time savings across thousands of attendees. We also get into where AI agents and large language models are already finding a foothold in events, particularly around unstructured documents like artist specs, supplier agreements, and operational paperwork that can swallow hundreds of hours. Ritesh shares why "AI-native" should mean more than a writing assistant in a text box, and what it looks like when AI becomes an extension of a lean events team, including a prototype voice agent designed to handle common ticket-holder questions without creating new support bottlenecks. If you're interested in the real business mechanics of events, and how SaaS, payments, data, and AI can quietly shape everything from entry lines to repeat attendance, this conversation offers a fresh way to think about an industry that touches all of us, even when we don't think of it as a tech story. And as a bonus, Ritesh leaves a music recommendation that sent me back to an album I had not played in years, Burial's Untrue, with "Archangel" as the track to start with. After listening, tell me this, where do you think unified data and practical AI will make the biggest difference in live experiences over the next couple of years, on the promoter side or the fan side, and why?

Have you ever looked at a global hiring plan and wondered whether you are building a team, or accidentally buying a bundle of hidden fees, legal risk, and avoidable stress? In this episode, I'm joined by Oksana Petrus from Alcor, where she leads customer success and operations, helping tech companies build and scale engineering teams across Eastern Europe and Latin America. If you have ever tried to expand beyond your home market, you know the promise is real, access to great talent, broader coverage across time zones, and the chance to build faster. But the reality can get messy quickly once contracts, compliance, culture, and cost assumptions collide. Oksana brings a sharp perspective because she has seen both sides. Earlier in her career she worked as a lawyer with outsourcing providers, so she understands how pricing structures and contracts can create surprises once a team is already in motion. We talk about why so many leaders start out thinking outsourcing will be simple, then discover they cannot clearly see what they are paying for, who is actually doing the work, or how much of the spend is going to overhead. We also discuss the growing challenge of trust in recruiting, especially as AI tools make it easier to fake profiles, inflate experience, and even perform better in interviews than the person behind the screen can deliver on the job. Oksana shares how teams are responding with stronger verification, background checks, and a more transparent operating model so hiring managers can feel confident about who they are bringing in. We also dig into the real cost of global scaling, and why "salary charts" are only the starting point. Oksana explains how benefits, taxes, local customs like a 13th salary, currency controls, and even language realities can derail budgets and slow hiring if teams do not have local insight. The result is often frustration on both sides, candidates lose momentum, managers lose time, and projects drift. Culture comes through as a theme too, and not in a vague, feel good way. We talk about how different regions communicate, how expectations need to be set early, and why "challenge culture" can be a strength when leaders welcome it. Oksana shares an example of a CTO who came to value Eastern European teams precisely because they questioned decisions and offered alternatives that improved outcomes. If you are a founder, CTO, or business leader thinking about scaling an engineering team this year, this episode is a practical look at what tends to go wrong, why it gets expensive, and how to build a smarter path forward without overcommitting too early. Where do you think the line is between smart global expansion and taking on complexity before your business is ready for it, and what has your own experience taught you?

How can a world that produces more than enough food still leave millions of people struggling to put a healthy meal on the table? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I speak with Jordan Schenck, CEO of Flashfood, about the growing paradox at the heart of our global food system. Grocery prices are climbing, families everywhere are making harder choices at the checkout, and food banks are seeing rising demand. Yet at the same time, vast quantities of perfectly edible food never make it onto a plate. Jordan shares the startling scale of the problem. In North America alone, billions of pounds of edible food are thrown away every year, including huge volumes from grocery stores themselves. Fresh produce, meat, and dairy often end up discarded even though they remain safe and nutritious to eat. The result is a system where food waste and food insecurity grow side by side, despite a supply chain that already produces far more calories than the world needs. Flashfood is attempting to change that equation with a simple but powerful idea. Through its marketplace app, the company partners with grocery retailers to sell surplus food at steep discounts before it reaches the landfill. Shoppers gain access to fresh groceries at far lower prices, while retailers recover value from inventory that might otherwise be lost. What emerges is a rare triple win for shoppers, grocers, and the environment. During our conversation, Jordan explains how consumer behavior, retail expectations, and supply chain logistics have shaped today's food waste problem. She also shares how technology and data are beginning to shift the system in a different direction. Flashfood is now working with more than two thousand grocery partners across North America and serving over a million users, using data and AI to help retailers price surplus inventory more effectively and move products before they are discarded.But the story behind Flashfood is also personal. Jordan reflects on her earlier experiences at Impossible Foods and as founder of the beverage brand Sunwink, and how those roles helped her see both the strengths and weaknesses inside modern food production. Over time, she began to question whether the industry truly needed more products on shelves, or whether the bigger opportunity lay in fixing the inefficiencies that already existed. Our discussion touches on the psychology of grocery shopping, the economics of surplus inventory, and the cultural expectations that lead retailers to overstock shelves in the first place. We also explore why many consumers are more open to buying discounted food than retailers once believed, particularly as the cost of living continues to rise. Perhaps most encouraging of all is the idea that solving food waste does not require entirely new supply chains or radical lifestyle changes. Sometimes it simply requires connecting the dots between food that already exists and the people who need it most.

Is 2026 the year AI finally has to prove it is worth the investment? In this episode, I'm joined by Chris Riche-Webber, VP of Business Intelligence and Analytics at SmartRecruiters, to explore why so many AI and agentic AI initiatives stall after the pilot phase and what separates the projects that scale from the ones that quietly disappear. With Gartner predicting that more than 40 percent of agentic AI programs could be cancelled by 2027, Chris brings a pragmatic, data-led perspective on what is really happening inside organizations as the hype meets operational reality. We talk about the fundamentals that have not changed despite the new technology. Influence, clearly defined problems, measurable impact, and adoption still determine success, yet they are often overlooked in the rush to deploy the latest tools. Chris explains why "good vibes" are no longer enough in front of a CFO, how to baseline outcomes properly, and why ownership of results is one of the most common missing pieces in enterprise AI programs. A big part of the conversation focuses on what Chris calls the "agent washing" problem. Just as products are sometimes marketed with fashionable labels that do not reflect their real value, many solutions are being positioned as agentic without delivering true autonomy or business outcomes. We discuss how leaders can cut through the noise by asking better questions, aligning technology to specific use cases, and recognizing when simple automation is the right answer. Trust, adoption, and measurable ROI emerge as the three signals that determine whether an AI initiative survives. Chris shares a clear framework for defining these signals in a way that is consistent, comparable over time, and meaningful to the executive team. We also explore how connecting talent decisions to revenue, productivity, and retention changes the conversation, especially in the context of SmartRecruiters' broader SAP ecosystem and the opportunity to link people data directly to business performance. This is a conversation about moving from experimentation to accountability, from buying narratives to solving real problems, and from technology-first thinking to outcome-first leadership. So as the window for easy wins closes and the demand for proof of value grows, will your AI strategy be remembered as a pilot that generated excitement or as an initiative that delivered measurable business impact?

What if the real AI race in 2026 isn't about building bigger models, but about where decisions are made, how fast they happen, and whether they deliver measurable value? In this episode, I'm joined by John Bradshaw, Director of Cloud Computing Technology and Strategy at Akamai, to unpack his predictions for the next phase of cloud, AI inference, and the economics that will shape enterprise technology over the next 12 months. As organizations move beyond experimentation, John explains why the boardroom conversation has shifted from capability to return on investment, and how spiraling compute demands are forcing leaders to rethink the balance between performance, cost, and innovation. We explore why this new financial scrutiny is not slowing AI adoption, but refining it. John shares how inefficient GPU workflows, centralized inference, and poorly aligned architectures are being challenged by a more disciplined approach that pushes intelligence closer to the edge. This shift is not only about latency and performance. It is about building scalable, value-driven platforms that can support real-time decision-making, agentic workloads, and global user experiences without breaking traditional IT budgets. Trust is another major theme throughout our conversation. From the rise of everyday AI agents that quietly handle routine tasks to the growing importance of secure, resilient inference pipelines, John outlines how low-latency edge infrastructure, local processing, and hybrid cloud models will redefine reliability for both enterprises and consumers. We also discuss the smart home backlash following recent outages, and why the next generation of connected products will be designed to work even when the network does not. The episode also looks at the future of streaming, where consolidation, intelligent content delivery, and AI-driven personalization are reshaping both the user experience and the economics behind the platforms. Behind the scenes, orchestration is emerging as a defining capability, with multiple models and services working together to validate outputs, reduce hallucinations, and create more dependable AI systems. This is a conversation about moving from possibility to production, from experimentation to accountability, and from centralized architectures to distributed intelligence. So as AI becomes embedded in every workflow and every customer interaction, will the winners be the companies with the biggest models, or the ones that know exactly where their AI should live, how it should be orchestrated, and how it proves its value every single day?

What happens when AI moves from a standalone tool to a teammate that works inside the flow of your organization? In this episode, I'm joined by Mick Hodgins, General Manager for EMEA at Notion, to explore how the idea of a connected AI workspace is reshaping the way teams collaborate, make decisions, and measure productivity. With a career that includes more than a decade at Google scaling growth across multiple countries, Mick brings a unique perspective on what it takes to build technology businesses across diverse markets and why this moment in AI feels fundamentally different from previous waves of innovation. We talk about Notion's journey from a flexible, block-based collaboration platform to an AI-native workspace where context is the real differentiator. Mick explains why AI performs better when it understands how work actually happens, and how embedding agents directly into shared workflows allows teams to move from prompting tools to orchestrating outcomes. From automated reporting and knowledge management to self-improving agent loops that learn from their own performance, the conversation brings to life how organizations are already using AI to remove the "work around the work" and focus on higher-value thinking. A major theme throughout the discussion is return on investment. In a world where many companies are still stuck in pilot mode, Mick shares how leaders can reframe ROI around productivity, speed, and the elimination of repetitive tasks rather than treating AI as a single project with a fixed payback period. We also explore how roles, org structures, and hiring priorities are beginning to shift as agents become extensions of team capability rather than experimental add-ons. Because Mick leads the EMEA region, we also dive into the differences in adoption between the US and Europe, from regulatory considerations and cultural attitudes to the growing strength of the European startup ecosystem. It's a balanced view that recognizes both the caution and the creativity emerging across the region. This is ultimately a conversation about friction. What happens to an organization when coordination overhead disappears, when reporting builds itself, and when knowledge stays current without human intervention? So as AI agents move from novelty to infrastructure, are businesses ready to redesign how work gets done, and what becomes possible when teams stop managing tasks and start compounding impact?

*]:pointer-events-auto scroll-mt-[calc(var(--header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" dir="auto" tabindex="-1" data-turn-id= "request-WEB:927f9cca-7aa3-47be-8fb7-33bf01261dc7-6" data-testid= "conversation-turn-14" data-scroll-anchor="true" data-turn= "assistant"> Is your cloud foundation ready for the explosion of AI workloads, or are you about to scale technical debt at the speed of innovation? In this episode, I'm joined by Apurva Kadakia, Global Head of Cloud and Partnerships at Hexaware, an AI-first transformation company helping enterprises modernize the core systems that will determine whether their AI strategies succeed or stall. With a front-row seat to large-scale cloud programs across industries, Apurva explains why so many organizations that "moved to the cloud" still find themselves unprepared for what comes next, and why modernization-led migration has become a business priority rather than a technology upgrade. We unpack the real warning signs that cloud environments are not fit for AI, from monolithic architectures and spiraling compute costs to hidden integration complexity and security gaps that only surface at scale. Apurva introduces the idea of "clarity before cloud," a structured approach to understanding sprawling application estates, identifying what truly matters to the business, and matching each workload to the right modernization path using the five R's. It's a conversation that moves beyond theory into the practical decisions leaders need to make now if they want to avoid being locked out of future innovation. The role of AI inside the transformation journey is another major theme. Rather than treating AI as a destination, Apurva shares how AI-led and human-perfected assessment models are already accelerating application discovery, classification, and migration planning, completing the majority of the heavy lifting while keeping human judgment firmly in control. We also explore why governance cannot be an afterthought, and how a dedicated Cloud Transformation Office can drive adoption, reskilling, stakeholder alignment, and data readiness without slowing delivery. Looking ahead to a world of agentic systems and rapidly multiplying cloud workloads, this episode offers a clear message. The organizations that win will not be the ones that adopted cloud first, but the ones that modernized with intent. So as AI moves from experimentation to enterprise scale, are your applications, your architecture, and your operating model truly ready to support it, or is now the moment to rethink your path before the next wave hits?

What if the biggest transformation in hospitality isn't happening in the dining room, but in the kitchen you never see? In this episode, I'm joined by James Pool, Chief Technology and Operations Officer at Middleby, a company quietly powering more than a hundred brands across commercial foodservice and food processing. With more than three decades spent accelerating how food is cooked, prepared, and delivered at scale, James offers a rare look inside the technology, automation, and connected platforms reshaping how some of the world's most recognizable restaurant and retail brands operate. We explore what the connected, IoT-enabled kitchen actually looks like in practice, and why James prefers to think of it as digital automation for the entire restaurant. From front-of-house energy optimization to automated food safety reporting and real-time equipment intelligence in the back, the conversation reveals how data is being used to reduce waste, improve uptime, simplify training, and ultimately increase profitability at the store level. This isn't about adding more screens or more complexity, it's about removing friction from every step of the operation. James also shares how Middleby is bringing together a vast portfolio of technologies, from rapid-cook ovens and ventless kitchens to robotics and AI-driven service insights, into a single harmonized experience. That integration is opening the door to new formats such as ghost kitchens and non-traditional locations, where food can be prepared almost anywhere without the constraints that once defined a commercial kitchen. Along the way, we discuss how brands like Yum! Brands, Dunkin', Domino's, and Kroger are balancing speed, consistency, cost control, and customer experience in an environment where every investment must prove its return. The episode also takes us inside Middleby's Innovation Kitchens around the world, where operators can experiment with layouts, workflows, and equipment in real conditions before committing capital in the field. It's a powerful reminder that the future of hospitality is being prototyped long before it reaches the high street. So as automation, AI, and real-time analytics move from the factory floor into the heart of the restaurant, is the smart kitchen becoming the most important competitive advantage in foodservice, and are brands ready to rethink how their entire operation is designed around it?

In this episode, I'm joined by Ansel Stein, Vice President of Operations at Crisis24, and the leader behind AiiA powered by Palantir, an intelligence platform built to help executives cut through noise and make better calls in uncertain conditions. Ansel's background spans more than two decades across analysis, diplomacy, and high-stakes advisory work, including supporting U.S. national security priorities. Today, he's applying that same discipline to the private sector, helping organizations turn overwhelming streams of information into judgment leaders can actually use. We talk about what "intelligence" really means in this context, and why it's different from collecting more data or running another monitoring program. Ansel breaks down the thinking behind the AiiA President's Brief, inspired by the kind of concise, high-rigor briefings senior government leaders rely on, and explains how that model translates into business decision-making without losing context or nuance. If you have ever felt buried by alerts, headlines, and competing narratives, this conversation puts language around that problem and offers a practical alternative. We also address the concerns many leaders have about AI, privacy, and the fear of being tracked. Ansel is clear on boundaries, what data AiiA uses, why open-source intelligence matters, and how governance needs to be designed upfront if trust is going to hold. From structured analytic techniques and scenario planning to the idea that risk and opportunity often sit side by side, this episode is a look at how organizations can move from reacting to anticipating, without handing accountability over to a machine. If your team is trying to shorten the time from signal to decision while still protecting trust, what would it look like to treat intelligence as a leadership habit rather than a crisis tool, and are you ready to build that muscle before the next disruption hits?

How did a routine request from the FBI turn into a decade-long legal battle that helped reshape modern privacy law and ultimately inspire a new kind of mobile network? In this episode, I sit down with Nicholas Merrill, founder of Phreeli and one of the most influential yet often under-recognized figures in the fight for digital rights. Long before privacy became a mainstream talking point, Nick was running an internet service provider that powered major global brands. That journey took a dramatic turn in 2004 when he became the first person to challenge the constitutionality of a National Security Letter under the Patriot Act, living under a gag order for years while the case unfolded. What followed was a deeply personal and professional transformation that led him to question whether litigation and legislation alone could ever keep pace with the scale of modern surveillance. We explore how that experience pushed him toward a third path, building privacy directly into technology itself. From launching the Calyx Institute and developing privacy-focused Android software to raising a multi-million-dollar endowment for digital rights, Nick has spent decades turning principles into practical tools. Now, with Phreeli, he is taking that philosophy into one of the most data-hungry industries of all, mobile telecoms, reimagining what a carrier looks like when it is designed to know as little about its customers as possible. Our conversation also tackles the shifting balance of power between governments and corporations in the data economy, and why the distinction between the two is becoming increasingly blurred. Nick explains the trade-offs involved in building a privacy-first operator in a heavily regulated market, the cryptographic thinking behind Phreeli's double-blind architecture, and why he believes consent and personal agency should sit at the center of the digital experience. This is a story about resistance, resilience, and the belief that technology can be used to restore choice rather than quietly remove it. It is also a timely reminder that privacy is not an abstract concept for activists and engineers, but something as familiar as closing the curtains in your own home. So after three decades on the front lines of this debate, what does Nick think most of us still misunderstand about our digital rights, and what single shift in mindset could change how we all approach privacy in the connected world?

Have you noticed how every week brings a new headline about AI driven fraud, yet it still feels hard to tell what is real risk and what is noise? In this Tech Talks Daily episode, I'm joined by Tommy Nicholas, CEO of Alloy, for a candid conversation that cuts through the fear driven commentary and gets into what fraud teams are actually dealing with right now. We start with a simple but important distinction that gets blurred all the time. Tommy separates classic "fraud," where institutions take the hit, from "scams," where individuals are manipulated into handing over money or access. That framing changes how you think about solutions, accountability, and where AI is making things worse. Tommy also shares why he believes fraud losses are often massively underreported. It is not because people are trying to hide the truth, it is because organizations rarely have a single, clean view of losses across every product line and channel. Add messy labeling, split ownership across teams, and reporting becomes a best effort estimate rather than an objective number. That reality matters if you're building board level narratives, budgets, or risk models on top of survey data. From there, we talk about what organizations are getting right. Tommy argues there is no magical "undetectable" attack that forces teams to give up, but there is a very real breakdown happening in old fallbacks, especially human review of images and video. The bigger shift he sees is banks and fintechs finally pushing for consistent tooling across every channel, web, mobile, branch, call center, support tickets, because fraud does not respect internal org charts. We then get into why Alloy's AI Assistant is an interesting signal for where agentic AI is heading in regulated work. Tommy explains that agents are only useful when they have rigorous context, strong sources of truth, and clear workflows. Otherwise they guess, and "looks good" is not the same as "safe to run in production." He also lays out where agents can genuinely outperform humans, like scaling investigations during sudden surges, while keeping processes auditable and repeatable. We close by looking ahead at agentic commerce, and why Tommy thinks the breakt hrough will arrive through weird, emergent behavior rather than a neat protocol roll out. When you listen back, do you think the next big leap in fraud prevention will come from better models, better data, or better operational discipline, and what would you bet on if your own customers were the ones on the line?

How do you prepare an entire generation for a world where AI is already shaping how we work, create, and solve problems? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I'm joined by Dr. Tara Nattrass, Chief Innovation Strategist for Education at Lenovo, for a grounded and thoughtful conversation about what responsible AI integration really looks like in K–12 classrooms. Tara brings more than 25 years of experience inside school districts, including serving as Assistant Superintendent for Teaching and Learning in Arlington Public Schools, so this isn't a theory-led discussion. It's informed by lived experience. We explore how the conversation has shifted over the past 18 months. AI has been present in schools for years through adaptive software and analytics, but the arrival of generative and now agentic AI tools has accelerated everything. As Tara explains, the debate is no longer about whether AI should be in schools. It's about how to approach it responsibly, strategically, and in ways that genuinely improve learning outcomes. A big theme in our conversation is AI literacy. Tara breaks this down in practical terms, moving beyond technical understanding to include critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, and the ability to evaluate risk and bias. She shares real examples of students designing AI tools to solve problems in their communities, shifting the focus from passive consumption to active creation. We also talk about infrastructure readiness. Many school systems have bold ambitions around AI, but there is often a gap between vision and technical capability. AI-ready devices, intelligent infrastructure, cybersecurity, and data governance all play a role in making innovation sustainable rather than experimental. Lenovo's approach, as Tara describes it, centers on building education ecosystems rather than simply refreshing hardware. There is also a careful balance to strike between innovation, privacy, and inclusion. From hybrid AI models to questions around where data is stored and who can access it, schools are navigating complex decisions. Tara shares how Lenovo partners with districts, policymakers, and organizations such as ISTE and ASCD to align infrastructure, professional learning, and governance frameworks. Looking ahead, we discuss what will separate school systems that truly benefit from AI from those that simply layer new tools onto old teaching models. Vision, educator upskilling, cybersecurity, and rethinking assessment all feature prominently in her answer. If you are working in education, technology leadership, or policy, this conversation offers a practical view of how AI-ready classrooms are being built today and what still needs to happen next. As always, I'd love to hear your thoughts. How is AI reshaping learning in your organization, and are you ready for what comes next?

What does autonomous IT really look like when you move beyond the slideware and start wiring systems together in the real world? At Dynatrace Perform in Las Vegas, I sat down with Pablo Stern, EVP and GM of Technology Workflow Products at ServiceNow, to unpack exactly that. Pablo leads the teams focused on CIOs and CISOs, building the workflows and security products that sit at the heart of modern IT organizations. From service desks and command centers to risk and asset management, his remit is clear: enable AI to work for people, not the other way around. We began with ServiceNow's deepening multi-year partnership with Dynatrace. While the announcement made headlines, Pablo was quick to point out that the real story starts with customers. This collaboration is rooted in a shared goal of helping joint customers reduce outages, improve SLA adherence, and shrink mean time to resolution. The vision of autonomous IT operations is not about hype. It is about connecting observability data with deterministic workflows so that insight can evolve into coordinated, system-level action. Pablo walked me through the maturity curve he sees emerging. First came AI-powered insight, summarizing data and surfacing signals from noise. Then came task automation, drafting knowledge articles, paging teams, triggering predefined playbooks. The next step, and the one that excites him most, is orchestrated autonomy. That means stitching together skills, agents, and workflows into systems that can drive end-to-end outcomes. It is a journey measured in years, not months, and it depends as much on digitizing process and building trust as it does on technology. We also explored root cause analysis, still one of the biggest time drains in IT. By combining Dynatrace's AI-driven observability with ServiceNow's workflow engine, enterprises can automate forensic steps, correlate events faster, and shorten the time spent on major incident bridges where teams debate ownership. Even incremental improvements in accuracy can save hours when incidents strike. Trust, of course, remains central. Pablo was candid that full self-healing systems are still some distance away. What we will see first is relief automation, controlled failovers, scripted actions suggested by machines but approved by humans. Over time, as confidence grows and processes become fully digitized, the balance will shift. Beyond the technology, a consistent theme ran through our conversation. Outcomes have not changed. Enterprises still want higher availability, faster resolution, better employee experiences. What is changing is the how. ServiceNow is reimagining its platform to deliver those outcomes at a much higher standard, not through incremental tweaks, but through rethinking workflows for an AI-first world. From design partnerships with banks building pre-flight change checks, to internal teams acting as the toughest customers, this was a grounded, practical conversation about where autonomous operations are headed and what it will take to get there. If you are a CIO, CISO, or IT leader wondering how to move from theory to execution, this episode offers a clear-eyed look behind the curtain.

What happens when nearly half of organizations admit they have no AI-specific security controls, yet AI-driven data leaks are accelerating at the same time? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I spoke with Aayush Choudhry, CEO and co-founder of Scrut Automation, about what he sees as a blind spot in the cybersecurity industry. While much of the market continues to design tools for Fortune 500 enterprises with deep pockets and large security teams, Aayush argues that the real existential risk sits with the 99 percent of businesses that cannot survive a serious breach. Aayush brings a founder's perspective shaped by firsthand pain. Before launching Scrut, he and his co-founder experienced the grind of managing compliance and security as a cloud-native startup trying to sell into enterprises. They were outsiders to GRC and security at the time, forced to learn from first principles. That experience became the foundation for Scrut Automation, a modern GRC platform built specifically for small and mid-sized companies that cannot afford six-month implementations, armies of consultants, or half-million-dollar tooling budgets. We explore why treating compliance and security as separate functions increases risk for smaller organizations. In the mid-market, the same small team is often responsible for both. When compliance is handled as a box-ticking exercise and security as a separate technical discipline, gaps emerge. Scrut's approach converges governance, risk, and security signals into a unified layer that translates hundreds of technical alerts into context-aware risks that actually matter to the business. Our conversation also tackles AI complacency. Using the classic confidentiality, integrity, and availability framework, Aayush outlines what minimum viable AI security hygiene looks like in practice. That includes ensuring AI agents are not over-privileged compared to the humans they represent, placing guardrails around sensitive data fed into models, and extending supply chain security thinking to agentic integrations. For resource-constrained teams, these are not theoretical concerns. They are daily realities. Perhaps most compelling is his view that AI can act as a force multiplier for small teams. By embedding accumulated expertise into agents trained on anonymized patterns and edge cases, Scrut aims to democratize security know-how that would otherwise require multiple full-time analysts. The goal is simple but ambitious: make enterprise-grade security outcomes accessible without enterprise-grade headcount. If you are leading a small or mid-sized business and wondering how to balance growth, compliance, and AI risk without breaking the bank, this conversation offers a candid look from the trenches.

How do you build enterprise software for the companies that keep the world turning, while also building a leadership culture where people can actually thrive? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I spoke with Kerrie Jordan, Chief Marketing Officer and SVP at Epicor, about her journey from studying literature to helping shape cloud ERP strategy at a global software company serving more than 20,000 customers worldwide. Kerrie's story is a reminder that there is no single path into technology leadership. Sometimes the foundations are laid in unexpected places, through storytelling, creativity, and a deep curiosity about people. Kerrie shares how her early career in product lifecycle management opened her eyes to the human side of software. Interviewing customers and writing case studies showed her that behind every system implementation is a personal story, a career milestone, or a business trying to survive and grow. That perspective still shapes how she approaches product and marketing today at Epicor, a company recently recognized as a Leader in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for Cloud ERP for Product-Centric Enterprises for the third consecutive year. But this conversation goes far beyond market recognition. We talk openly about burnout, resilience, and the reality of leading through pressure. Kerrie reflects on the importance of protecting time, creating space to reconnect, and building a culture where empathy is practiced, not just discussed. Her view of leadership is grounded in communication, psychological safety, and being tough on problems rather than people. Mentorship is another thread running throughout our discussion. Kerrie explains why powerful mentorship is not passive. It requires vulnerability, preparation, and a willingness to hear difficult advice. A single phrase from a mentor early in her career, "stick-to-itiveness," continues to shape how she approaches hard problems today. We also explore the future of women in manufacturing and technology. Kerrie highlights the need for intentional change across education, early career development, and leadership visibility. She believes technology, particularly AI, can expand access, enable upskilling, and introduce flexibility that supports long-term career growth. At the same time, she makes a simple but powerful point. Women in tech want the same thing as anyone else: the space and autonomy to do their jobs well. From customer co-innovation and community-driven product roadmaps to inclusive leadership under commercial pressure, this episode offers a candid look at what it really takes to lead in enterprise technology today. If you are building products, leading teams, or questioning your own next career step, I think you will find something in Kerrie's story that resonates.

Why do so many of us feel busy all day, yet struggle to point to the meaningful work we actually completed? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I sit down with Tomás Dostal Freire, CIO of Miro, to unpack a challenge that quietly drains modern organizations. Tomás brings experience from companies like Google, Netflix, and Booking.com, and now leads both IT and business acceleration at Miro. His focus is simple but ambitious. Move beyond AI experimentation and rethink how work itself gets done. We explore new research revealing that for every hour of creative work, employees lose up to three hours to meetings, admin, emails, and maintenance tasks. That ratio is more than an inconvenience. It affects decision-making speed, employee satisfaction, and ultimately a company's ability to compete. Tomás argues that future candidates will choose employers based on how much unnecessary internal work they are expected to tolerate. In other words, reducing busy work is quickly becoming a talent strategy. One of the biggest culprits? Context switching. With dozens of browser tabs open and information scattered across tools, teams spend more time stitching together fragments than making decisions. Tomás describes how duplication of work, outdated systems, and a lack of shared context quietly erode momentum. AI, he believes, should not create more noise or another standalone tool. It needs to be embedded where collaboration already happens. We discuss the difference between single-player AI moments, where individuals use tools in isolation, and multiplayer AI collaboration, where shared context allows teams to move faster together. At Miro, this philosophy has shaped what they call an AI Innovation Workspace, a shared canvas where human insight and AI assistance coexist in real time. Tomás also shares practical advice for leaders who want to reclaim creative time. Start by identifying tasks you dislike doing that could easily be handled by someone junior. That list often reveals what AI can already automate. Then focus on building transferable skills like cognitive agility and first-principles thinking, rather than chasing every new tool. If you are wrestling with burnout, fragmented workflows, or wondering how AI can genuinely improve collaboration without overwhelming teams, this conversation offers a grounded, optimistic perspective. And yes, we even add a Beatles classic to the Spotify playlist along the way.

How do you protect millions in revenue during your busiest hour of the year when your entire business depends on digital performance? At Perform 2026, I caught up with Alex Hibbitt, Engineering Director responsible for the customer platform at Storio Group, to unpack what happens when observability moves from an engineering afterthought to a board-level priority. Storio Group was formed from the merger of Photobox and Albelli, bringing together multiple brands and five separate e-commerce platforms into one unified customer journey. That consolidation created opportunity, but it also exposed risk, especially during peak trading from Black Friday through Black Sunday and into the Christmas rush. Alex shared what it really looks like when downtime is non-negotiable. At peak, Storio's platform can generate up to 1.5 million euros per hour. A single poorly timed incident is not simply a technical problem, it is a direct threat to revenue and customer trust. Before partnering with Dynatrace, the team was relying heavily on centralized logging, processing over a billion log lines a day and depending on engineers to manually interpret signals. It was reactive, labor intensive, and left too much to chance. What stood out for me was how cultural change led the transformation. Rather than imposing a new tool from the top down, Alex and his team built a maturity model engineers could relate to, created internal champions, and framed observability as risk management and business protection. The result was a reported 65 to 70 percent reduction in log costs, a 50 percent drop in mean time to detect overall, and up to 90 percent improvement for the most severe incidents. We also explored how unifying logs, metrics, and traces into a single AI-driven platform helped Storio move from reactive firefighting to proactive detection. During one Black Sunday alone, three major issues were identified early enough to avoid an estimated 4.5 million euros in potential impact. This conversation goes beyond tooling. It is about protecting customer experience, safeguarding revenue during peak demand, and building an engineering culture that embraces change. If your organization is wrestling with cloud costs, fragmented monitoring, or the pressure to deliver flawless digital performance under load, there are some powerful lessons here.

*]:pointer-events-auto scroll-mt-(--header-height)" dir="auto" tabindex="-1" data-turn-id= "3c98e6f5-1dbf-46a0-be22-7f5411922664" data-testid= "conversation-turn-1" data-scroll-anchor="false" data-turn="user"> *]:pointer-events-auto scroll-mt-[calc(var(--header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" dir="auto" tabindex="-1" data-turn-id= "request-WEB:d2d484c3-b4bf-41d3-90b0-9faafbd8dc01-0" data-testid= "conversation-turn-2" data-scroll-anchor="true" data-turn= "assistant"> How do you design financial infrastructure that keeps running when the unexpected hits, whether that is a regional outage, a regulatory shift, or a sudden spike in digital demand? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I'm joined by Katsutoshi Itoh from Sony and Masahisa Kawashima from NTT, both representing the IOWN Global Forum, to unpack how photonics-based networks could change the foundations of digital finance. Speaking with me from Kyoto, they share how the Innovative Optical and Wireless Network vision is moving beyond theory and into practical, finance-specific use cases. Financial institutions are under constant pressure to deliver uninterrupted services while meeting ever tighter compliance standards. Yet as we discuss, many existing architectures still rely on asynchronous data replication and layered resilience added after the fact. On paper, it works. In a real disruption, gaps quickly appear. Itoh and Kawashima explain how synchronous replication over ultra-low latency optical networks can reduce the risk of data loss while simplifying disaster recovery and lowering operational complexity. We also explore the role of Open All-Photonic Networks and why reducing packet forwarding layers can dramatically cut latency and infrastructure costs. Instead of concentrating compute and storage in dense urban data centers, photonics enables distributed computing across regions while maintaining deterministic performance. That shift opens the door to improved resilience, better infrastructure utilization, and new approaches to scaling without constant over-provisioning. Sustainability sits alongside resilience in this conversation. Rather than treating energy efficiency as a compromise, the IOWN vision distributes power demand geographically, making better use of locally available renewable energy and reducing concentrated load pressures. It is a subtle but important rethink of how infrastructure supports broader societal goals. Looking ahead, we consider what this could mean for digital banking platforms, AI-driven risk management, and cross-border financial services. If infrastructure limitations fall away, institutions can design services around business needs rather than technical constraints. If you are curious about how photonics could underpin the next generation of financial services, this episode offers a grounded and thoughtful perspective. As always, I would love to hear your thoughts after listening.

Have you ever wondered why "compliance" still gets treated like a slow, spreadsheet-heavy chore, even though the rest of the business is moving at machine speed? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I sit down with Matt Hillary, Chief Information Security Officer at Drata, to talk about what actually changes when AI and automation land in the middle of governance, risk, and compliance. Matt brings a rare viewpoint because he lives this day-to-day as "customer zero," running Drata internally while also leading IT, security, GRC, and enterprise apps. We get practical fast. Matt shares how AI-assisted questionnaire workflows can turn a 120-question security assessment from a late-afternoon time sink into something you can complete with confidence in minutes, then still make it upstairs in time for dinner. He also explains how automation flips the audit dynamic by moving from random sampling to continuous, full-population checks, using APIs to validate evidence at scale, without hounding control owners unless something is actually wrong. We also talk about what security leadership really looks like when the stakes rise. Matt reflects on lessons from his time at AWS, why curiosity and adaptability matter when the "canvas" keeps changing, and how customer focus becomes the foundation of trust. That theme runs through the whole conversation, including the idea that the CISO role is steadily turning into a chief trust officer role, where integrity, transparency, and credibility under pressure matter as much as tooling. And because burnout is never far away in security, we dig into the human side too. Matt unpacks how automation can reduce cognitive load, but also warns about swapping one kind of pressure for another, especially when teams get trapped producing endless dashboards and vanity metrics instead of focusing on the few measures that actually reduce risk. To wrap things up, Matt leaves a song for the playlist, Illenium's "You're Alive," plus a book recommendation, "Lessons from the Front Lines, Insights from a Cybersecurity Career" by Asaf Karen, which he says stands out for how it treats the human side of security leadership. If you're thinking about modernizing compliance in 2026 without losing the human element, his parting principle is simple and powerful: be intentional, keep asking why, and spend your limited time on what truly matters. So where do you land on this shift toward continuous trust, do you see it becoming the default expectation for buyers and auditors, and what should leaders do now to make sure automation reduces pressure instead of quietly adding more? Share your thoughts with me, I'd love to hear how you're approaching it.

Can designing for human error become the strongest cybersecurity strategy in an AI-accelerated world? In this episode, I sit down with Yaz Bekkar, Principal Consulting Architect for Barracuda XDR and a member of the company's Office of the CTO, to explore why the speed introduced by AI is changing the risk equation for every organization. As automation allows teams to move faster, it also means small mistakes can scale at machine speed. Yaz argues that resilience in 2026 is no longer about trying to prevent every incident. It is about anticipating failure, containing the blast radius, and recovering quickly without bringing the business to a standstill. Our conversation challenges one of the most persistent narratives in security, the idea that people are the weakest link. Yaz explains why safeguarding the workforce begins with reshaping the environment they operate in. When the secure option is also the easiest and fastest path, risky shortcuts begin to disappear. From secure defaults and least-privilege access to paved-road workflows for administrators, he shares practical examples of how organizations can reduce complexity, limit exposure, and support better decisions under pressure. We also tackle the limits of annual compliance training and the cultural shift required to build real cyber resilience. Yaz makes the case for continuous, bite-sized practice embedded into everyday work, from three-minute phishing simulations that teach without blame to short, hands-on misconfiguration drills for technical teams. The result is stronger habits, faster response times, and a security posture designed for real human behavior rather than ideal conditions. If AI is accelerating both innovation and risk, how do leaders move from a prevention-only mindset to resilient operations that protect business continuity when controls fail? And what would change in your organization if every system was designed with the assumption that someone, somewhere, will eventually make a mistake?

At Davos this year, some of the biggest names in tech sent a clear signal. AI is no longer a novelty. It is no longer a proof-of-concept exercise. As Demis Hassabis of Google DeepMind suggested, AI will shape more meaningful work. And Satya Nadella of Microsoft was even more direct. AI only matters if it improves real outcomes for people. So what does that look like inside the enterprise? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I'm joined by Andrew Boyagi, Customer CTO at Atlassian, to unpack how the conversation has shifted from experimentation to execution. Developers, in many ways, are the perfect lens for understanding this moment. Over the last two decades, their role has expanded far beyond writing code. They now own products, infrastructure, operations, and business outcomes. AI is simply the next chapter in that evolution. Andrew argues that AI will not replace engineers. It will raise expectations. As intelligent tools absorb repetitive work, the real value moves up the stack. System design. Architectural thinking. Reviewing and refining AI-generated output and orchestrating solutions that solve genuine business problems. And through it all, humans remain firmly in the loop. We also explore what this means for leadership, why mindset is starting to matter more than technical skill alone, how organizations can avoid layering AI on top of broken processes. And why the companies pulling ahead are treating AI as a strategic discipline, not a feature upgrade. This is a conversation grounded in reality. It speaks to product leaders, CTOs, CIOs, and anyone asking a simple but powerful question. If we are investing in AI, what are we actually getting back? And before we close, we look ahead to Team '26 and the themes Andrew and his team are already working on. If this year has been about proving value, what will the next chapter demand from enterprise leaders? As always, I'd love to hear your thoughts. Are you seeing proof of value in your organization yet, or are you still working through the pilot phase?

*]:pointer-events-auto scroll-mt-(--header-height)" dir="auto" tabindex="-1" data-turn-id= "9168b9fb-9cc7-4a32-9cf3-0f12c0141fb6" data-testid= "conversation-turn-5" data-scroll-anchor="false" data-turn="user"> *]:pointer-events-auto scroll-mt-[calc(var(--header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" dir="auto" tabindex="-1" data-turn-id= "request-69932a54-73c0-8395-979c-6bc9e24ea9ee-0" data-testid= "conversation-turn-6" data-scroll-anchor="true" data-turn= "assistant"> After stepping off stage from moderating a panel, a Senior Frontend Developer from Capgemini waited to say hello. She asked for a quick photo, and within minutes, we were deep in conversation about hackathons, women in tech, mentoring, and the pride she felt watching Egypt host a platform of this scale. Her name is Alaa Ali Kortoma, and what began as a quick introduction turned into her very first podcast appearance. In today's episode, you will hear directly from someone on the ground in Cairo about what AI Everywhere means to her, to Egypt, and to a generation of more than 750,000 graduates entering the workforce each year. We talk about bridging the gap between academia and industry, shrinking the distance between startups and investors, and why she believes AI represents opportunity rather than replacement. If AI really is everywhere, it should look like a possibility. It should look like inclusion. It should look like young women mentoring at hackathons. It should look like national strategies focused on responsible adoption and skills development. So let me beam your ears to Cairo and introduce you to Alaa Ali Kortoma. And after spending three days at AI Everything MEA, what does AI Everywhere mean to me? It is not hype. It is not a headline. It is policymakers embedding AI into public services. It is engineers building Arabic language models tailored to local needs. It is healthcare systems using AI to detect disease earlier. It is investors listening to founders. It is young professionals investing in themselves. One phrase from this conversation will stay with me long after the microphones were turned off. Proud and full of possibility. Over the last decade, I have seen technology stories unfold across continents, but Cairo reminded me why I started this podcast in the first place. Technology becomes powerful when it connects people. When it builds confidence. When it proves that innovation is not reserved for a select few regions. AI is often framed as a Silicon Valley or East Asia story. What I witnessed in Egypt suggests something broader is taking shape. Capital is flowing differently. Partnerships are forming across Africa and the Middle East. Talent is visible. Voices are confident. So if AI can thrive beside the Nile, if it can empower graduates in Cairo to see opportunity rather than threat, then perhaps AI really is everywhere. The final question is this. What does AI Everywhere look like where you are, and what role are you playing in shaping it? Wherever you are listening from, I would love to hear your story too.

In this episode, I'm joined by Bill Briggs, CTO at Deloitte, for a straight-talking conversation about why so many organizations get stuck in what he calls "pilot purgatory," and what it takes to move from impressive demos to measurable outcomes. Bill has spent nearly three decades helping leaders translate the "what" of new technology into the "so what," and the "now what," and he brings that lens to everything from GenAI to agentic systems, core modernization, and the messy reality of technical debt. We start with a moment of real-world context, Bill calling in from San Francisco with Super Bowl week chaos nearby, and the funny way Waymo selfies quickly turn into "oh, another Waymo" once the novelty fades. That same pattern shows up in enterprise tech, where shiny tools can grab attention fast, while the harder work, data foundations, APIs, governance, and process redesign, gets pushed to the side. Bill breaks down why layering AI on top of old workflows can backfire, including the idea that you can "weaponize inefficiency" and end up paying for it twice, once in complexity and again in compute costs. From there, we get into his "innovation flywheel" view, where progress depends on getting AI into the hands of everyday teams, building trust beyond the C-suite, and embedding guardrails into engineering pipelines so safety and discipline do not rely on wishful thinking. We also dig into technical debt with a framing I suspect will stick with a lot of listeners. Bill explains three types, malfeasance, misfeasance, and non-feasance, and why most debt comes from understandable trade-offs, not bad intent. It leads into a practical discussion on how to prioritize modernization without falling for simplistic "cloud good, mainframe bad" narratives. We finish with a myth-busting riff on infrastructure choices, a quick look at what he sees coming next in physical AI and robotics, and a human ending that somehow lands on Beach Boys songs and pinball machines, because tech leadership is still leadership, and leaders are still people. So after hearing Bill's take, where do you think your organization is right now, measurable outcomes, success theater, or somewhere in between, and what would you change first, and please share your thoughts? Useful Links Connect With Bill Briggs Deloitte Tech Trends 2026 report Deloitte The State of AI in the Enterprise report

Perform 2026 felt like a turning point for Dynatrace, and when Steve Tack joined me for his fourth appearance on the show, it was clear this was not business as usual. We began with a little Perform nostalgia, from Dave Anderson's unforgettable "Full Stack Baby" moment to the debut of AI Rick on the keynote stage. But the humor quickly gave way to substance. Because beneath the spectacle, Dynatrace introduced something that signals a broader shift in observability: Dynatrace Intelligence. Steve was candid about the problem they set out to solve. Too much focus on ingesting data. Too much time spent stitching tools together. Too many dashboards. Too many alerts. The real opportunity, he argued, is turning telemetry into trusted, automated action. And that means blending deterministic AI with agentic systems in a way enterprises can actually trust. We unpacked what that looks like in practice. From United Airlines using a digital cockpit to improve operational performance, to TELUS and Vodafone demonstrating measurable ROI on stage, the emphasis at Perform was firmly on production outcomes rather than pilot projects. As Steve put it, the industry has spent long enough in "pilot purgatory." The next phase demands real-world deployment and real return. A big part of that confidence comes from the foundations Dynatrace has laid with Grail and Smartscape. By combining unified telemetry in its data lakehouse with real-time topology mapping and causal AI, Dynatrace is positioning itself as the engine behind explainable, trustworthy automation. When hyperscaler agents from AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud call Dynatrace Intelligence, they are expected to receive answers grounded in causal context rather than probabilistic guesswork. We also explored what this means for developers, who often carry the burden of alert fatigue and fragmented tooling. New integrations into VS Code, Slack, Atlassian, and ServiceNow aim to bring observability directly into the developer workflow. The goal is simple in theory and complex in execution: keep engineers in their flow, reduce toil, and amplify human decision-making rather than replace it. Of course, autonomy raises questions about risk. Steve acknowledged that for now, humans remain firmly in the loop, with most agentic interactions still requiring checkpoints. But as trust grows, so will the willingness to let systems self-optimize, self-heal, and remediate issues automatically. We closed by zooming out. In a market saturated with AI claims, Steve encouraged listeners to bet on change rather than cling to the status quo. There will be hype. There will be agent washing. But there is also real value emerging for those prepared to experiment, learn, and scale responsibly. If you want to understand where AI observability is heading, and how deterministic and agentic intelligence can coexist inside enterprise operations, this episode offers a grounded, practical perspective straight from the Perform show floor.

What happens when the noise around AI starts to drown out the actual business value it is meant to deliver? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I sat down with Adam Field, Chief AI and Product Officer at Tungsten Automation, fresh from the conversations unfolding at Davos. While headlines continue to celebrate agentic AI and sweeping automation claims, Adam offered a grounded perspective shaped by decades of experience turning AI pilots into measurable, ROI-driven deployments. His view is simple. The hype cycle may be accelerating, but many organizations still struggle with the fundamentals. Adam described a common boardroom dynamic. "What do we want? AI. What do we want it to do? We're not sure." That pressure to move fast often collides with a deeper reality. Software has shifted from deterministic to probabilistic. Leaders who grew up expecting the same inputs to always produce the same outputs now face systems that behave differently by design. Measuring value in that environment requires a different mindset. One of the most compelling ideas in our conversation was Adam's concept of "boring AI." While splashy announcements about replacing hundreds of employees grab attention, he argues that real returns often come from quieter use cases. At Tungsten Automation, that means intelligent document processing, extracting trusted, AI-ready data from the 80 percent of enterprise information that is unstructured. Contracts, invoices, transcripts, compliance paperwork. The work may not trend on social media, but it saves time, improves accuracy, and fits directly into daily workflows. We also explored accountability. AI can compress output, but it concentrates responsibility. When generative tools make architectural or compliance decisions, the liability does not shift to the model. Organizations remain accountable for privacy, ethics, and customer trust. Adam shared his own experience rebuilding a legacy application in days using AI code generation, only to discover licensing and compliance nuances that required human judgment. The lesson was clear. AI amplifies capability, yet human oversight remains essential. For leaders searching for signals that an AI strategy will actually deliver long-term returns, Adam pointed to two patterns from the small percentage of projects that succeed. First, integration into daily workflows drives adoption. Second, partnering with trusted vendors often reduces risk compared to attempting everything in-house. In a world flooded with open-source experiments and "X is dead" headlines, discipline and focus still matter. Tungsten Automation has spent four decades evolving alongside automation technologies, previously known as Kofax. Today, the company applies large language models and agentic workflows to transform unstructured data into decision-ready insights across finance, logistics, banking, and insurance. It is a reminder that the future of AI may be less about replacing people and more about removing friction so humans can do the work they were actually hired to do. So as AI investment continues to grow and pressure for returns intensifies, the question becomes harder to ignore. Are we chasing the headlines, or are we building systems that quietly deliver value where it counts? Useful Links Connect with Adam Field Learn more about Tungsten Automation Upcoming Events

How do you build a $30 million ARR business with just three people and a fleet of AI agents doing the heavy lifting? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I connected with Amos Joseph, CEO of Swan AI. From the moment we joked about AI notetakers silently observing our conversation, it was clear this discussion would go beyond surface-level automation talk. Amos is attempting something bold. He is building what he calls an autonomous business, one designed to scale with intelligence rather than headcount. Amos has already built and exited two B2B startups using the traditional growth-at-all-costs model. Raise early, hire fast, expand the vision, chase valuation. This time, he is rewriting that script entirely. Swan AI is built around ARR per employee, human-AI collaboration, and what he describes as scaling employees rather than scaling the org chart. With more than 200 customers and only three founders, Swan is already testing whether AI agents can run real go-to-market operations autonomously. We explored why over 90 percent of AI implementations fail and why grassroots experimentation consistently outperforms executive mandates. Amos argues that companies looking outward for AI solutions before understanding their internal bottlenecks are simply scaling chaos. The organizations that succeed start with process clarity, define what humans should do versus what should be automated, and then allow AI to execute within that structure. It is a powerful reminder that becoming AI-native has less to do with tools and more to do with operational self-awareness. We also unpacked the difference between automation and agentic AI. Traditional automation follows deterministic steps coded in advance. Agentic AI shifts decision-making power to the model itself. The AI decides what to do next, introducing statistical reasoning rather than predefined logic. That shift in agency changes everything about how workflows operate and how leaders think about control. Perhaps most fascinating is how Swan generates pipeline entirely through LinkedIn. No paid ads. No outbound. Amos has built an AI-driven engine that creates content, monitors engagement, qualifies prospects, and nurtures relationships at scale. It is an experiment in trust-based distribution powered by agents, not marketing budgets. This conversation reframes what growth can look like in an AI-native world. If scaling no longer equals hiring, and if every employee becomes a manager of AI agents, what does leadership look like next? How do founders build organizations that amplify human zones of genius rather than bury them under coordination overhead? If you are questioning long-held assumptions about team size, growth, and AI adoption, this episode will give you plenty to think about.

Is Bitcoin still just a digital store of value, or is it quietly evolving into the financial engine of a new on-chain economy? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I sat down with Callan Sarre, Co-Founder of Threshold Labs, to explore what happens when the world's most recognized crypto asset stops sitting idle and starts becoming programmable capital. We recorded against the backdrop of a sharp market correction that wiped out value across crypto and traditional assets alike, making for a timely and honest conversation about volatility, maturity, and why Bitcoin's next chapter may be defined by utility rather than price speculation. Callan explains how the rise of ETFs and institutional flows is reshaping ownership, while decentralized infrastructure is working to ensure users can still access the asset's underlying power. At the heart of our discussion is tBTC, a trust-minimized bridge that moves native Bitcoin into DeFi without handing control to centralized custodians. Callan breaks down how Threshold's decentralized custody model works in practice and why removing single points of failure matters in a post-FTX world. We also explore the behavioral barriers that have kept long-term holders from putting their BTC to work, the real risks behind Bitcoin yield strategies, and the infrastructure required to make these tools accessible to a broader audience through familiar Web2-style experiences. The conversation also takes a global turn as we look at why Asia is accelerating Bitcoin innovation, how regulation is driving institutional adoption in Western markets, and what the shift from DAO-led governance to a lab execution model reveals about the realities of building at scale. Looking ahead five years, Callan paints a picture of an integrated on-chain financial system where Bitcoin can be borrowed against, deployed, and settled instantly across shared liquidity rails, while still preserving the principles that made it attractive in the first place. So if Bitcoin becomes productive capital and the majority of financial activity moves on-chain, what does that mean for traditional finance, for long-term holders, and for the next wave of builders? And are we ready for a world where the most secure monetary asset also becomes the most composable?

What actually happens when AI stops being a cloud-only experiment and starts running on desks, in labs, and inside real teams trying to ship real work? In this episode, I sit down with Logan Lawler, Senior Director at Dell Technologies, to unpack how AI workloads are really being built and supported on the ground today. Logan leads Dell's Precision and Pro Max AI Solutions business and hosts Dell's own Reshaping Workflows podcast, giving him a rare vantage point into how engineers, developers, creatives, and data teams are actually working, not how marketing slides suggest they should be. We start by cutting through the noise around AI PCs. At every conference stage, Logan breaks down what genuinely matters when choosing hardware for AI work. CPUs, GPUs, NPUs, memory, and software stacks all play different roles, and misunderstanding those roles often leads teams to overspend or underspec. Logan explains why all AI workstations qualify as AI PCs, but not all AI PCs are suitable for serious AI work, and why GPUs remain central for anyone doing real model development, fine-tuning, or inference at scale. From there, the conversation shifts to a broader architectural rethink. As AI workloads grow heavier and data sensitivity increases, many organizations are reconsidering where compute should live. Logan shares how GPU-powered Dell workstations, storage-rich environments, and hybrid cloud setups are giving teams more control over performance, cost, and data. We explore why local compute is becoming attractive again, how modern GPUs now rival small server setups, and why hybrid workflows, local for development and cloud for deployment, are becoming the default rather than the exception. One of the most compelling parts of the discussion comes when Logan connects hardware choices back to business reality. Drawing on real-world examples, he explains how teams use local AI environments to move faster, reduce cloud costs, and avoid getting locked into architectures that are hard to unwind later. This is not about abandoning the cloud, but about being intentional from the start, mainly as AI usage spreads beyond developers into marketing, operations, and everyday business roles. We also step back to reflect on a deeper challenge. As AI becomes easier to use, what happens to critical thinking, curiosity, and learning? Logan shares a candid perspective, shaped by his experiences as a parent, technologist, and podcast host, raising questions about how tools should support rather than replace thinking. If you are trying to make sense of AI PCs, local versus cloud compute, or how teams are really reshaping workflows with AI hardware today, this conversation offers grounded insight from someone living at the center of it. Are we designing systems that genuinely empower people to think better and build faster, or are we sleepwalking into decisions we will regret later? How do you want your own AI workflow to evolve? Useful Links TLDR AI newsletter and the Neurons. The Reshaping Workflows podcast Connect with Logan Lawler Follow Dell Technologies on LinkedIn

What does it really take to move AI from experimentation into something enterprises can trust, scale, and rely on every day? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I'm joined by Rob Lay, CTO and Solutions Engineering Director for Cisco UK and Ireland, recorded in the run-up to Cisco Live EMEA in Amsterdam. As agentic AI dominates conference agendas on both sides of the Atlantic, this conversation steps away from model hype. It focuses on the less glamorous, but far more decisive layer underneath it all: infrastructure. Rob explains why the biggest constraint on scaling AI agents in production is no longer imagination or ambition, but the readiness of the environments those agents run on. We talk about how legacy technical debt, latency, fragmented networks, and disconnected security tools can quietly undermine AI investments long before leaders see any return. As organizations move out of pilot mode and into real execution, those cracks become impossible to ignore. A big part of the discussion centers on why AI changes the relationship between network, compute, and security teams. Traditional silos struggle to keep up as autonomous systems make decisions at machine speed. Rob shares how Cisco is approaching this shift through tighter integration across the stack, with security designed directly into the network rather than bolted on later. When AI agents act independently, routing everything through centralized chokepoints does not hold up. We also explore how operational complexity is evolving. Tool sprawl is already overwhelming many IT leaders, and agent sprawl is clearly coming next. Rob outlines Cisco's platform strategy, including how agent-driven operations, human oversight, and context-aware automation are shaping a new approach to day-to-day resilience. This leads into a wider conversation about digital resilience as a business issue, where visibility, assurance, and learning from incidents matter more than static continuity plans that only get tested once a year. For European leaders in particular, data sovereignty and control remain at the forefront. Rob explains how Cisco is responding with flexible deployment models, local data residency options, and air-gapped environments that support AI innovation without forcing customers into a single rigid operating model. We close by looking at where enterprises are actually seeing value today, where expectations are still running ahead of reality, and what leaders attending Cisco Live should really be listening to as announcements roll in. If you are responsible for infrastructure, security, or technology strategy in an AI-driven organization, this conversation offers a grounded view of what needs to be ready before agents can truly deliver on their promise. As AI-powered systems start to move faster than most roadmaps anticipated, are you confident the foundations underneath them are ready to keep up, and what would you change if you were starting that journey today? Useful Links Connect with Rob Lay Cisco Live Follow Cisco on LinkedIn

What does it really take to move enterprise AI from impressive demos to decisions that show up in quarterly results? One year into his role as Senior Vice President, Americas Consulting, Neil Dhar sits at the intersection of strategy, capital allocation, and technology execution. Leading the firm's Americas business and a team of close to 100,000 consultants, he has a front-row view into how large organizations are reassessing their AI investments. From global healthcare leaders like Medtronic to luxury retail brands such as Neiman Marcus, the conversation has shifted. Early proofs of concept helped executives understand what was possible. Now the focus is firmly on proof of value and on whether AI can drive growth, competitiveness, and measurable return. In this episode, I speak with Neil Dhar about what has changed in the boardroom over the past year and why ROI has become the central question. Drawing on more than three decades in finance and private equity, including senior leadership roles at PwC, Neil explains why AI is increasingly being treated as a capital allocation decision rather than a technology experiment. Every dollar invested has to earn its place, whether through productivity gains, operational improvement, or new revenue opportunities. Vanity projects no longer survive scrutiny, especially when boards and investors expect results on a much shorter timeline. We also explore how IBM is applying these same principles internally. Neil shares how the company has identified hundreds of workflows across the business, prioritized those with the strongest economic impact, and used AI and automation to drive large-scale productivity gains. The result is a potential $4.5 billion in annual run rate savings by 2025, with those gains being reinvested into innovation, people, and future growth. It is a candid look at what happens when AI strategy, leadership accountability, and disciplined execution come together inside a global organization. If you are a business leader trying to separate real value from hype, or someone wrestling with how to justify AI spend beyond experimentation, this conversation offers a grounded perspective on what enterprise AI looks like when it is treated as a business decision rather than a technology trend. Are you ready to rethink how AI earns its place inside your organization, and what proof of value really means in 2026? Useful Links Connect With Neil Dhar IBM Institute for Business Value, "The Enterprise in 2030" study Learn More About IBM Consulting

How Do Marketplaces Turn AI Ambition Into Scalable, Trusted Enterprise Reality? That is the question I explore in this episode with Julie Teigland, Global Vice Chair for Alliances and Ecosystems at EY, someone who sits right at the intersection of enterprise demand, technology platforms, and the ecosystems that increasingly power modern AI adoption. As organizations race to deploy AI at scale, many are discovering that the real challenge is not a lack of tools, but the complexity of choosing, integrating, governing, and standing behind those decisions with confidence. Julie explains why marketplaces are becoming a powerful mechanism for reducing friction in this process, helping enterprises move beyond experimentation toward AI solutions that are trusted, scalable, and aligned with real business outcomes. We talk about how marketplaces can collapse complexity, curate choice, and bring much needed clarity to leaders who are overwhelmed by the sheer volume of AI options available today. Julie also shares how EY approaches this challenge through its "client zero" mindset, turning the lens inward and treating EY itself as the first marketplace customer. By doing so, EY stress tests governance, security, and integration at real enterprise scale, serving tens of thousands of clients, running hundreds of thousands of servers, and processing hundreds of millions of transactions every day. That internal experience shapes how EY helps clients navigate trust, accountability, and cross-vendor integration risks, particularly as AI becomes more embedded into workflows and decision-making. We also explore how strong alliances with cloud leaders like Microsoft and SAP are shaping how AI solutions are vetted, standardized, and deployed across industries, as well as how regulation, particularly in Europe, is influencing a shift toward responsibility by design. This conversation goes beyond technology to focus on orchestration, trust, and outcomes, and why marketplaces are evolving from simple app stores into something far more strategic for enterprise AI. If you are trying to understand how ecosystems, governance, and marketplaces can help turn AI from isolated projects into sustained business value, this episode offers a thoughtful and grounded perspective. I would love to know what resonated with you most. How do you see marketplaces shaping the future of AI adoption inside your organization? Useful LInks Connect With Julie Teigland Learn More About EY

As someone who spends a lot of time covering AI announcements, product launches, and conference stages, it is easy to forget that most AI today is still built for desks, screens, and digital workflows. Yet the reality is that the vast majority of the global workforce operates in the physical world, on roads, construction sites, depots, and job sites where mistakes are measured in injuries, collisions, and lives lost. That gap between where AI innovation happens and where real risk exists is exactly why I wanted to sit down with Amish Babu, CTO at Motive. In this episode, I speak with Amish about what it truly means to build AI for the physical economy. We unpack why designing AI for vehicles, fleets, and safety-critical environments is fundamentally different from building AI for emails, documents, or dashboards. Amish explains why latency, trust, and reliability are non-negotiable when AI is embedded directly into vehicles, and why edge AI, multimodal sensing, and on-device compute are essential when milliseconds matter. This is a conversation about AI that has to work perfectly in messy, unpredictable, real-world conditions. We also explore how Motive approaches AI as a full system, combining hardware, software, and models into a single platform built specifically for life on the road. Amish shares how AI can help prevent collisions, support drivers in the moment, and create measurable safety and operational outcomes for fleets operating across transportation, construction, energy, and public sector environments. Along the way, we challenge common misconceptions around AI in vehicles, including the idea that it is about surveillance rather than protection, or that all AI systems are created equal when lives are on the line. If you are interested in how AI moves beyond productivity tools and into high-stakes environments where safety, accountability, and trust matter most, this episode offers a grounded and practical perspective from someone building these systems every day. I would love to hear your thoughts on this one. How do you see the role of AI evolving as it moves deeper into the physical world? Useful Links Connect with Amish Babu Learn More About Motive How Motive's AI works: Real-time edge intelligence, humans-in-the-loop, and continuous improvement.

*]:pointer-events-auto scroll-mt-[calc(var(--header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" dir="auto" tabindex="-1" data-turn-id= "54141b02-3c0e-46be-b764-c57b8d9d7ccc" data-testid= "conversation-turn-28" data-scroll-anchor="true" data-turn= "assistant"> In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I sat down with Jinsook Han, Chief Agentic AI Officer at Genpact, to unpack one of the most misunderstood shifts in enterprise AI right now. Many organizations feel confident about the value AI can deliver, yet only a small fraction are able to move beyond pilots and into autonomous operations that actually scale. Genpact's Autonomy By Design research puts hard data behind that gap, and Jinsook explains why optimism often races ahead of readiness. We explore why agentic AI changes the rules entirely. When AI systems begin to act, decide, and adapt on behalf of the business, familiar operating models start to strain. Jinsook makes a compelling case that agentic AI cannot be treated like another software rollout. It demands a rethink of data, governance, roles, and even how teams define work itself. The shift from tools to teammates alters expectations for people across the organization, from frontline operators to the C-suite, and exposes just how unprepared many companies still are. Governance is a major theme throughout the conversation, but not in the way most leaders expect. Rather than slowing progress, Jinsook argues that governance must become part of how work happens every day. She shares how Genpact approaches agent certification, maturity, and oversight, using vivid analogies to explain why quality and alignment matter more than simply deploying large numbers of agents. We also dig into why many governance models fail, especially when they rely on committees instead of lived understanding. Upskilling sits at the heart of this transformation. Jinsook walks through how Genpact is training more than 130,000 employees for an agentic future, starting with executives themselves. The focus is not on abstract learning, but on proving that today's work looks different from yesterday's. Observability, explainability, and responsible AI are woven into this approach, with command centers designed to monitor both agent performance and health, turning early signals into opportunities rather than panic. This conversation goes well beyond hype. It is about readiness, responsibility, and the reality of building autonomous systems that still depend on human judgment. As organizations rush toward agentic AI, are they truly prepared to change how decisions are made, how people work, and how accountability is defined, or are they still treating AI as a faster hammer rather than a new kind of teammate? Useful Links Connect with Jinsook Han Learn More about Genpact

What happens when leaders are confident about AI, but the people expected to use it are not ready? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I sat down with Caroline Grant from Slalom Consulting to explore one of the most persistent tensions in enterprise AI adoption right now. Boards and executives are spending more, moving faster, and expecting returns sooner than ever, yet many organizations are struggling to translate that ambition into outcomes that scale. Caroline brings fresh insight from Slalom's latest research into how leadership, culture, and workforce readiness are shaping what actually happens next. We unpack a clear shift in ownership for AI transformation, with CTOs and CDOs increasingly leading organizational redesign rather than HR. That change reflects how deeply AI now cuts across technology, operations, and business models, but it also introduces new risks. Caroline explains why sidelining people teams can create blind spots around skills, incentives, and trust, especially as roles evolve and uncertainty grows inside the workforce. The result is what Slalom describes as a growing AI disconnect between executive optimism and day-to-day reality. Despite the noise around job losses, the data tells a more nuanced story. Many organizations are creating new AI-related roles at a pace, yet almost all are facing skills gaps that threaten progress. We talk about why reskilling at scale is now unavoidable, how unclear career paths fuel employee distrust, and why focusing only on technical capability misses the human side of adoption. Caroline also challenges assumptions about skill priorities, warning that deprioritizing empathy, communication, and change leadership could undermine effective human-AI collaboration. We also dig into ROI expectations, with most UK executives now expecting returns within two years. Caroline shares why that ambition is achievable, where it breaks down, and why so many organizations remain stuck in pilot mode. From governance and decision rights to culture and leadership behavior, this conversation goes beyond tools and platforms to examine what separates experimentation from fundamental transformation. As AI becomes a test of leadership as much as technology, how are you closing the gap between vision and execution within your organization, and are you building a workforce that can keep pace with change rather than resist it? Connect With Caroline Grant from Slalom Consulting The Great AI Disconnect: Slalom's Insights Survey Learn More About Slalom

Is the browser quietly becoming the most powerful and dangerous interface in modern work? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I sat down with Karim Toubba, CEO of LastPass, to unpack a shift that many people feel every day but rarely stop to question. The browser is no longer just a window to the internet. It has become the place where work happens, where SaaS lives, and increasingly, where humans and AI agents meet data, credentials, and decisions. From AI-native browsers to prompt-based navigation and headless agents acting on our behalf, the way we access information is changing fast, and so are the risks. Karim shares why this moment feels different from earlier waves like SaaS adoption or remote work. Today, more than ever, productivity, identity, and security collide inside the browser. Shadow AI is spreading faster than most organizations can track, personal accounts are being used to access powerful AI tools, and sensitive data is being uploaded with little visibility or control. At the same time, attackers have noticed that the browser has become the soft underbelly of the enterprise, with a growing share of malware and breaches originating there. We also explore the rise of agentic AI and what happens when software, not people, starts logging into systems. When an agent books travel, pulls data, or completes workflows on a user's behalf, traditional authentication and access models start to break down. Karim explains why identity, visibility, and control must evolve together, and why secure browser extensions are emerging as a practical foundation for this next phase of computing. The conversation goes deep into what users do not see when AI browsers ask for access to email, calendars, and internal apps, and why convenience often masks long-term exposure. Throughout the discussion, Karim brings a grounded perspective shaped by decades in cybersecurity, from risk-based vulnerability management to enterprise threat intelligence. Rather than pushing fear, he focuses on realistic steps organizations and individuals can take, from understanding what data is being shared, to treating security teams as partners, to using tools that bring passwords, passkeys, and authentication into one trusted place as browsing evolves. As AI reshapes how we search, work, and make decisions, the question is no longer whether the browser matters. It is whether we are ready for it to act as the front door to both our productivity and our risk, so are you securing your browser for the future you are already using today? Connect with Karim Toubba LastPass Threat Intelligence, Mitigation, and Escalation (TIME) team page Phish Bowl Podcast

What really happens when AI helps teams write code faster, but everything else in the delivery process starts to slow down? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I'm joined once again by returning guest and friend of the show, Martin Reynolds, Field CTO at Harness. It has been two years since we last spoke, and a lot has changed since then. Martin has relocated from London to North Carolina, gaining back hours of his working week. Still, the bigger shift has been in how AI is reshaping software delivery inside modern enterprises. Our conversation centers on what Martin calls the AI velocity paradox. Development teams are producing more code at speed, often thanks to AI coding agents, yet testing, security, governance, and release processes are struggling to keep up. The result is a growing gap between how fast software is written and how safely it can be delivered. Martin shares research showing how this imbalance is already leading to production incidents, hidden vulnerabilities, and mounting technical debt. We also dig into why this AI-driven transition feels different from previous waves, such as cloud, mobile, or DevOps. Many of the same concerns around security, trust, and control still exist, but this time, everything is happening far faster. Martin explains why AI works best as a human amplifier, strengthening good engineering practices while exposing weak ones sooner than ever before. A significant theme in the episode is visibility. From shadow AI usage to expanding attack surfaces, Martin outlines why security teams are finding it harder to see where AI is being used and how data is flowing through systems. Rather than slowing teams down, he argues that the answer lies in embedding governance directly into delivery pipelines, making security automatic rather than an afterthought. We also explore the rise of agentic AI in testing, quality assurance, and security, where specialized agents act like virtual teammates. When well-designed, these agents help developers stay focused while improving reliability and resilience throughout the lifecycle. If you are responsible for engineering, platform, or security teams, this episode offers a grounded look at how to balance speed with responsibility in an AI-native world. As AI becomes part of every stage of software delivery, are your processes designed to safely absorb that change, or are they quietly becoming the bottleneck? Useful Links Learn More About Harness The State of AI in Engineering The State of AI Application Security EngineeringX Follow Harness on LinkedIn Connect With Martin Reynolds Thanks to our sponsors, Alcor, for supporting the show.

What really happens to a business when payments stop working, even for a few minutes? I recorded this episode live at Dynatrace Perform in Las Vegas, inside the Venetian, surrounded by engineers, operators, and business leaders all wrestling with the same uncomfortable reality. Payment outages are no longer rare edge cases. They are becoming a routine operational risk, and the cost is far higher than many organizations realize. To unpack that shift, I sat down with Victoria Ruffo, Software Engineering Team Lead at FreedomPay, for a grounded and practical conversation about resilience, observability, and what failure actually looks like in modern commerce. Victoria explains how FreedomPay supports merchants by orchestrating every part of the payment journey through a single platform, from terminal management to remote updates and even on-device advertising. If you have checked into a hotel and noticed a payment terminal quietly branded "Secured By FreedomPay," there is a good chance you have already interacted with her team's work. That real-world exposure gives her a clear view of what happens when systems fail and why customers are far less patient than businesses often assume. We talk about new research from FreedomPay, Dynatrace, and Retail Economics that puts a stark number on the issue. $44.4 billion in U.S. retail and hospitality revenue is at risk every year due to payment disruptions. But as Victoria points out, the most alarming insight is not the headline figure. It is the gap between how long customers are willing to wait and how long outages actually last. Most consumers abandon a purchase after seven minutes, while many disruptions stretch on for hours. In those early minutes alone, the majority of revenue is already gone. The conversation moves beyond statistics into lived experience. From lunch breaks cut short by declined payments to stadiums losing an entire event's worth of revenue in a single outage, Victoria shares why these failures are not abstract technical issues. They directly affect staff wages, customer loyalty, and long-term brand trust. We also explore why cash-only backups and outdated terminals no longer reflect how people actually pay, and why uneven investment in resilience leaves many merchants dangerously exposed. AI plays a central role in the discussion, but not in the way hype cycles often suggest. Victoria is clear that FreedomPay is not using AI to touch cardholder data or write payment code. Instead, tools like Dynatrace Intelligence help teams detect issues faster, identify patterns humans might miss, and move from reaction to anticipation. That shift, she argues, is where real value shows up, especially when seconds and minutes matter. If you care about payments, customer experience, or the hidden connection between technical failure and business impact, this episode offers a timely reminder that outages do not have to be catastrophic if organizations plan for them properly. As consumers grow less patient and systems grow more complex, are your payment platforms designed to absorb disruption, or are they quietly waiting to fail at the worst possible moment? Useful Links Connect With Victoria Ruffo Learn More About Freedom Pay Whitepaper Payment Resilience in an Uncertain World Learn More About Dynatrace Perform Thanks to our sponsors, Alcor, for supporting the show.

In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I'm joined by Josh Haas, co-founder and co-CEO of Bubble, to unpack why the next phase of software creation is already taking shape. We talk about how the early excitement around AI-powered code generation delivered fast demos and instant gratification, but often fell apart when teams tried to turn those experiments into durable products that could grow with a business. Josh takes us back to Bubble's origins in 2012, long before AI hype cycles and trend-driven development. At the time, the idea was simple but ambitious: give more people the ability to build genuine software without spending months learning traditional programming. That early focus on visual development now feels timely again, especially as builders wrestle with the limits of black-box AI tools that hide logic until something breaks. We spend time on where vibe coding struggles in practice. Josh explains why speed alone is never enough once customers, payments, and sensitive data are involved. As he explains, most product requirements only surface after users arrive, and those edge cases are exactly where opaque AI-generated code can become risky. If you cannot see how your system works, you cannot truly own it, secure it, or fix it when something goes wrong. The conversation also digs into Bubble's hybrid approach, blending AI agents with visual development. Rather than asking builders to trust an AI, Bubble's model unquestioningly emphasizes clarity, auditability, and shared responsibility between humans and machines. Josh explains how visual logic makes software behavior explicit, helping teams understand rules, permissions, and workflows before they cause real-world problems. I learn how this mindset has helped Bubble-powered apps process over $1.1 billion in payments every year, a level of scale that leaves no room for guesswork. We also explore Bubble AI Agent, where conversational AI meets visual editing, and why transparency and control matter more than flashy demos. From governance and rollback logs to builder accountability, this episode looks at what it actually takes to build software that survives beyond the first launch. If you are building with AI or thinking about how software development is changing, this episode offers a grounded perspective on what comes after the hype fades. As AI tools become more powerful, the real question is whether they help you understand your product better over time, or slowly disconnect you from it. Which path should builders choose right now? Useful Links Connect with Josh Haas Learn More About Bubble Thanks to our sponsors, Alcor, for supporting the show.

How do you turn a developer-first product into a growth engine without losing trust, clarity, or focus along the way? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I'm joined by Sanjay Sarathy, VP of Developer Experience and Self Service at Cloudinary, for a grounded and thoughtful conversation about product-led growth when developers sit at the center of the story. Sanjay operates at a rare intersection. He leads Cloudinary's high-volume self-service motion while also caring for the developer community that fuels adoption, advocacy, and long-term loyalty. That dual perspective, part business, part builder, shapes everything we discuss. Our conversation picks up on a theme I have been exploring across recent episodes. When technical work is explained clearly, whether that is security, performance, or reliability, it stops being background noise and starts supporting growth. Sanjay shares how Cloudinary approached this from day one, starting with founders who were developers themselves and carried a deep respect for developer trust into the company's DNA. Documentation that reflects reality, platforms that behave exactly as promised, and support that shows up early rather than as an afterthought all play a part. What stood out to me was how early Cloudinary invested in technical support, even before many traditional growth motions were in place. That decision shaped a self-service experience that still feels human at scale. With thousands of developer sign-ups every day and millions of developers using the platform, Sanjay explains how trust compounds into referrals, word of mouth, and sustained adoption. We also dig into developer advocacy and why community is rarely a single thing. Developers gather around frameworks, tools, workflows, and shared problems, and Cloudinary has learned to meet them where they already are rather than forcing them into a single branded space. From React and Next.js users to enterprise advisory boards, feedback loops become part of the product itself. As AI reshapes how software is built and developer tools become more crowded, Sanjay offers a clear-eyed view on what separates companies that grow steadily from those that burn bright and stall. Profitability, experimentation with intent, and the discipline to double down on what works all feature heavily in his thinking. It is a conversation rooted in experience rather than theory. If you care about product-led growth, developer trust, or building platforms that scale without losing their soul, this episode offers plenty to think about. As always, I would love to hear your perspective too. How do you see developer communities shaping the next phase of product growth, and where do you think companies still get it wrong? Useful Links Connect with Sanjay Sarathy Learn more about Cloudinary Thanks to our sponsors, Alcor, for supporting the show.