Chevron doctrine overturned: Implications for tax professionals
Tax Section Odyssey · AICPA Tax Section
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (traffic.libsyn.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
In this joint episode, Neil Amato, host of the Journal of Accountancy podcast and Melanie Lauridsen, VP of AICPA Tax Policy and Advocacy discuss two recent Supreme Court decisions.
The Supreme Court ruling in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo overturned a 40-year-old precedent of deference referred to as the Chevron doctrine, affecting future rulemaking by eliminating the need for judges to defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. In Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Supreme Court ruled to alter the statute of limitations for challenging regulations, starting the clock when a plaintiff is injured rather than when the regulation is enforced.
These decisions introduce significant uncertainty for the accounting profession, particularly regarding IRS regulations and long-standing rules and emphasize the need for CPAs to stay informed and adaptable as the implications of these rulings unfold.
AICPA Resources
Melancon: Supreme Court decisions are 'big deal' for tax pros, The Tax Adviser, Aug. 1, 2024
Supreme Court overrules 40-year-old Chevron doctrine, The Tax Adviser, June 28, 2024
Supreme Court decision on Chevron doctrine will affect tax pros, Journal of Accountancy, June 24, 2024
For a full transcript of the episode, see Tax Section Odyssey on the AICPA & CIMA website.