PLAY PODCASTS
Torts - Negligence Part 1 - The Duty of Care
Season 4 · Episode 12

Torts - Negligence Part 1 - The Duty of Care

Study for the Bar in Your Car · Angela Rutledge, LLM, LLB

July 5, 202536m 56s

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (content.rss.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

Get ready to master the cornerstone of tort law with "Study for the Bar in Your Car"! In Episode 12: Negligence Duty, your AI hosts, Maude and Claude, kick off the deep dive into negligence, emphasizing that duty of care is the absolute bedrock of any claim. Without a legally recognized duty, no matter how severe the injury, there's simply no case.

This episode provides a comprehensive guide to understanding:

  • The General Standard of Care: It's always reasonable care. While the degree of care required scales up dramatically with the danger involved, the fundamental standard itself remains constant. You'll learn why "reasonable care" for handling gasoline looks very different from handling tissues. This objective standard holds individuals to what a hypothetical reasonably prudent person would do under similar circumstances. We also explore adjustments for superior skill or knowledge and relevant physical characteristics, contrasting them with mental characteristics which typically don't lower the standard.
  • Foreseeable Plaintiffs (The Zone of Danger): A crucial concept, duty is only owed to those who could reasonably be foreseen as potentially harmed by your actions. This pivotal idea is brought to life through the landmark Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad case, illustrating how a distant, unforeseeable injury meant no duty was owed, even if the initial act was negligent. We delve into the enduring debate between Justice Cardozo's narrow view and Justice Andrews' broader perspective on duty.
  • Special Duty Rules for Specific Actors:
    • Children: Generally held to the standard of a reasonably careful child of similar age and experience, but the adult activity rule applies a full adult standard if they're engaged in inherently dangerous, adult-only activities like driving.
    • Professionals: Doctors, lawyers, and accountants are held to the standard of an average member of their profession in good standing, often requiring expert testimony to prove breach. We also cover informed consent for medical professionals, requiring disclosure of material risks to patients.
    • Land Possessors: Your duty varies critically based on the entrant's status:
  • Special Duty Situations: Explore unique scenarios like the rescue doctrine and the firefighter's rule for professional rescuers, as well as the complexities of prenatal injuries and wrongful birth actions.
  • Statutory Standards (Negligence Per Se): Learn how violating a safety statute can conclusively establish both duty and breach, effectively replacing the reasonable person standard. We break down the crucial conditions for its application and discuss how compliance with a statute is evidence of care, but not an automatic shield from negligence.

This episode unpacks the intricate layers of duty, providing the foundational knowledge you need for bar exam success. Subscribe to the "Study for the Bar in Your Car" podcast today and build a rock-solid understanding of tort law!