PLAY PODCASTS
Annette O'Connor - Is the Simplicity of the Evidence Pyramid Actually Detrimental for Understanding Evidence?

Annette O'Connor - Is the Simplicity of the Evidence Pyramid Actually Detrimental for Understanding Evidence?

RCVS Knowledge - Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine

February 16, 201728m 6s

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (mcdn.podbean.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

The evidence pyramid for assessing the efficacy of interventions under real world conditions has been used in various forms for many years, and to a lesser extent the pyramid has been used for assessing evidence for disease risk factors. While acknowledging minor differences, many pyramids list the following information sources for interventions in decreasing order of “validity”: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials, randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case control studies, case series and case reports.

In this presentation Annette discusses the validity of the evidence pyramid on the interpretation of evidence from primary research. She proposes a new way to think about evidence from primary studies using the framework for classifying epidemiologic studies proposed by Pearce (2012) based on incident and prevalent cases. This would also result in a rethinking of the current evidence pyramid.

 

Veterinary Evidence Today
Edinburgh, 1-3 November 2016