History of Ideas 2: Hume
<p>Episode two in our series on the great essays is about David Hume. How can eighteenth-century arguments about the national debt help make sense of American politics today?&nbsp;When does public borrowing become a recipe for national disaster?&nbsp;Who is really in charge of the public finances: the government or the bankers, Washington, D.C. or Wall Street?&nbsp;And what has all this got to do with Hume’s arguments for the morality of suicide?</p><p>Read Hume’s original essay ‘Of Public Credit’ <a href="https://davidhume.org/texts/pld/pc" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">here</a>.</p><p>For more on Hume from the archive of the&nbsp;<em>LRB</em>:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3qFgYtE" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Jonathan Rée on Hume’s voracious appetites</a>: ‘“The Corpulence of his whole person was better fitted to communicate the Idea of the Turtle-Eating Alderman than of a refined Philosopher,” as a friend put it.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3X6KbtK" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Fara Dabhoiwala on Hume and mockery</a>: ‘David Hume often resorted to ridicule to undermine hypocrisy or superstition, even if he doubted its capacity to settle controversial questions, arguing that mockery was as likely to distort as to reveal the truth.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3qJRwTW" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">John Dunn on Hume and us</a>: ‘Hume is in some ways so&nbsp;<em>very</em>&nbsp;modern . . . But just because he is in some ways so close to us, it is easy to lose the sense that in many others his beliefs and experiences stand at some little distance from our own.’</p><br /><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>
Past Present Future · David Runciman
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (pscrb.fm) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
Episode two in our series on the great essays is about David Hume. How can eighteenth-century arguments about the national debt help make sense of American politics today? When does public borrowing become a recipe for national disaster? Who is really in charge of the public finances: the government or the bankers, Washington, D.C. or Wall Street? And what has all this got to do with Hume’s arguments for the morality of suicide?
Read Hume’s original essay ‘Of Public Credit’ here.
For more on Hume from the archive of the LRB:
Jonathan Rée on Hume’s voracious appetites: ‘“The Corpulence of his whole person was better fitted to communicate the Idea of the Turtle-Eating Alderman than of a refined Philosopher,” as a friend put it.’
Fara Dabhoiwala on Hume and mockery: ‘David Hume often resorted to ridicule to undermine hypocrisy or superstition, even if he doubted its capacity to settle controversial questions, arguing that mockery was as likely to distort as to reveal the truth.’
John Dunn on Hume and us: ‘Hume is in some ways so very modern . . . But just because he is in some ways so close to us, it is easy to lose the sense that in many others his beliefs and experiences stand at some little distance from our own.’
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices