OncLive® On Air

In this podcast, experts Joyce O’Shaughnessy, MD; Reshma L. Mahtani, DO; Heather McArthur, MD, MPH; and Paolo Tarantino, MD, PhD; discuss results of recent frontline maintenance trials for patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and their implications for treatment sequencing and patient management.

In this podcast, experts Charles M. Rudin, MD, PhD; Alex A. Adjei, MD, PhD; and Millie Das, MD; discuss the latest treatment advances for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), including how to sequence bispecific T-cell engagers and antibody-drug conjugates and ways to manage adverse events associated with these newer therapies.

In today’s episode Mazyar Shadman, MD, MPH, discussed results from a post hoc indirect comparison that evaluated zanubrutinib (Brukinsa) from phase 3 SEQUOIA trial (NCT03336333) compared with acalabrutinib (Calquence) plus venetoclax (Venclexta) from the phase 3 AMPLIFY trial (NCT03836261) in patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Dr Shadman is a professor in the Clinical Research Division, medical director of Cellular Immunotherapy, and the Innovators Network Endowed Chair at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center in Seattle, Washington.In our exclusive interview, Dr Shadman began with a top-line overview of how the indirect comparison was conducted and the rationale behind it. After discussing the design of the comparison, Dr Shadman then dove into a conversation on the results of the study, in addition to how it will help oncologists and patients alike in the clinic. Finally, Dr Shadman looked to the future of CLL management and underscored what research he would like to see conducted following the comparison and its results.

In this podcast, experts Hope S. Rugo, MD, FASCO; Giuseppe Curigliano, MD, PhD; Paolo Tarantino, MD, PhD; and Alastair Thompson, MD, MBChB, BSc (Hons), FRCS (Ed), FACS; discuss and debate recently published results of pivotal clinical trials in early-stage, HER2-positive breast cancer and their implications for patient care.

In this podcast, experts Patrick I. Borgen, MD; Don S. Dizon, MD, FACP, FASCO; Kevin S. Hughes, MD, FACS; and Banu Arun, MD, FASCO; discuss how genetic testing drives breast cancer management from screening and surgical decisions to targeted systemic therapies.

Breast Cancer Briefing, hosted by Sara Nunnery, MD, MSCI, a breast medical oncologist and the director of Breast Cancer Research at Tennessee Oncology in Nashville, is a podcast series that breaks down the latest news in breast cancer research, one conversation at a time.In today's episode, filmed live onsite at the 43rd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference, Dr Nunnery sat down with Neil M. Iyengar, MD, an associate professor and co-director of Breast Medical Oncology in the Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology at the Emory University School of Medicine, as well as the director of Survivorship Services at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.Their conversation centered around lifestyle and medical interventions pertinent to breast cancer survivorship. Dr Iyengar explained that although endocrine therapies can be life-saving, they disrupt estrogen signaling, which can lead to cardiometabolic dysfunction, including increased risks for diabetes, heart disease, and bone health issues. He noted that weight gain associated with these treatments is often tied to the induction of a post-menopausal state, which disrupts energy homeostasis and promotes inflammation.A key theme of the conversation was Dr Iyengar’s explanation of a "drug development paradigm" for lifestyle changes. Rather than offering generic advice, his research focuses on precision lifestyle interventions, treating diet and exercise as prescribed medical therapies with specific "doses". He highlighted that body mass index (BMI) is an insufficient tool for risk stratification, as high body fat despite a normal BMI is a significant risk factor for cancer recurrence.The discussion also covered the rising use of GLP-1 receptor agonists to manage metabolic health. These drugs replicate natural hormones to maintain glycemic balance and reduce hunger. Dr Iyengar addressed the black box warning for thyroid cancer associated with this class of drugs, noting that although the data are mixed, the protective benefits against obesity-related cancers appear to outweigh the risks. Finally, he emphasized that exercise is a critical tool for managing treatment adverse effects like fatigue, noting that although starting is difficult, the "return on investment" for patient health is immense.

Welcome to OncLive On Air®! I’m your host today, Kyle Doherty.OncLive On Air is a podcast from OncLive®, which provides oncology professionals with the resources and information they need to provide the best patient care. In both digital and print formats, OncLive covers every angle of oncology practice, from new technology to treatment advances to important regulatory decisions.In today’s episode, we spoke with David Morris, MD, FACS, and Alan H. Bryce, MD. Dr Morris is the president of Urology Associates, PC, in Nashville, Tennessee. Dr Bryce is a medical oncologist and the chief clinical officer of City of Hope Cancer Center Phoenix in Arizona.In our exclusive interview, Drs Morris and Bryce discussed the clinical implications of the FDA’s full approval of rucaparib (Rubraca) for BRCA mutation–associated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), including the notable data that supported the regulatory decision and how this agent fits into the mCRPC treatment paradigm.

From Discovery to Delivery: Charting Progress in Gynecologic Oncology, hosted by Ursula A. Matulonis, MD, brings expert insights into the most recent breakthroughs, evolving standards, and emerging therapies across gynecologic cancers. Dr Matulonis is chief of the Division of Gynecologic Oncology and the Brock-Wilcon Family Chair at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, as well as a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, both in Boston, Massachusetts.In this episode, Dr Matulonis sat down with guest Katharine M. Esselen, MD, MBA. Dr Esselen is an attending gynecologic oncologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and an assistant professor of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology at Harvard Medical School in Boston. Drs Matulonis and Esselen explored the growing effect of financial toxicity in gynecologic oncology, emphasizing how economic burden can influence access to care, treatment adherence, and patient outcomes. Dr Esselen, whose research focuses on patient-centered outcomes and value-based care, highlighted that financial toxicity extends beyond direct medical costs to include indirect burdens such as lost wages, childcare needs, transportation, and basic living expenses. To address these challenges, Dr Esselen and her colleagues developed a financial navigation program at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. This initiative includes systematic screening for financial concerns and dedicated support from a financial navigator who connects patients with resources such as insurance optimization, transportation assistance, and financial aid programs. Implementation of this program significantly increased identification of at-risk patients and improved access to supportive services.Importantly, Drs Matulonis and Esselen emphasized that financial toxicity is not only a quality-of-life issue but also a clinical one. Studies show that patients experiencing high financial burden are more likely to delay or forgo care and less likely to adhere to prescribed treatments, which may ultimately affect survival outcomes. Drs Matulonis and Esselen concluded the discussion by outlining the steps that can be taken to reduce financial burden on patients, underscoring the need for proactive screening, multidisciplinary support, and systemic change.

In this podcast, experts Carrie L. Kitko, MD; Miguel-Angel Perales, MD; and Amandeep Salhotra, MD, discuss GVHD prophylaxis strategies and therapies to address treatment-naive and steroid-refractory chronic GVHD.

In today’s episode, we spoke with Ticiana Leal, MD, about variability in community practice and evolving treatment strategies for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Dr Leal is a professor and director of the Thoracic Medical Oncology Program in the Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology at Emory University School of Medicine, as well as the medical director of the Clinical Trials Office at Winship Cancer Institute in Atlanta, Georgia.In our exclusive interview, Dr Leal began by discussing how SCLC management can differ widely across community settings according to how patients present. Leal emphasized the importance of quickly confirming a patient’s diagnosis and initiating treatment to avoid missing the critical window where chemotherapy could provide meaningful clinical benefit. However, Leal noted that the field still lacks predictive biomarkers to guide treatment selection. Accordingly, current strategies, including chemoimmunotherapy, maintenance approaches, and second-line options like tarlatamab-dlle (Imdelltra) and lurbinectedin (Zepzelca) are largely chosen based on clinical factors such as disease burden, comorbidities, and patient preferences.The conversation then shifted to the challenge of treating patients who may not meet traditional clinical trial eligibility criteria due to poor performance status, comorbidities, or social vulnerabilities. Leal stated that a multidisciplinary approach, including collaboration with supportive care teams, is essential to optimize outcomes for these patients. She noted that potential solutions to restrictive trial eligibility criteria may include decentralizing trials, improving collaboration between academic and community centers, and providing additional patient support such as transportation and care navigation services.Looking ahead, Leal emphasized the need for community practices to prepare for emerging therapies, including antibody-drug conjugates and novel immunotherapy approaches. Successfully integrating these treatments into everyday practice will require education, infrastructure development, and multidisciplinary collaboration, Leal imparted.

In today’s episode, we spoke with Julia Rotow, MD, and Martin Dietrich, MD, PhD. Dr Rotow is the clinical director of the Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology and director of clinical research at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, as well as an assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts. Dr Dietrich is a medical oncologist with The US Oncology Network Cancer Care Centers of Brevard and an assistant professor of internal medicine at the University of Central Florida College of Medicine in Orlando.In our exclusive interview, Drs Rotow and Dietrich discussed the significance of the accelerated FDA approval of zongertinib (Hernexeos) for patients with HER2 TKD–mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). They highlighted how this approval addresses a longstanding unmet need in a patient population that historically relied on chemotherapy-based approaches.They noted that the introduction of zongertinib into the frontline setting represents a meaningful shift toward upfront biomarker-driven care, aligning HER2-positive disease with other oncogene-driven lung cancers where targeted therapies are used upfront.The discussion also focused on efficacy findings from the pivotal phase 1b Beamion LUNG-1 trial (NCT04886804). In previously untreated patients with HER2 TKD mutations, zongertinib generated an objective response rate of 76% (95% CI, 65%-85%). The treatment also showed encouraging durability, with 64% of responders having a duration of response (DOR) lasting at least 6 months and 44% of responders having a DOR lasting at least 12 months. Regarding safety, Rotow and Dietrich explained that zongertinib was designed as a HER2-selective inhibitor, potentially minimizing off-target EGFR-related toxicities. The most common adverse effects included low-grade diarrhea, rash, and liver enzyme elevations, with interstitial lung disease occurring infrequently. Notably, no significant signal for cardiac toxicity was observed, distinguishing zongertinib from some other HER2-directed therapies. Finally, the experts underscored the importance of comprehensive biomarker testing to identify HER2 alterations and ensure that patients can benefit from these expanding targeted treatment options.

In today’s episode, we spoke with Misty D. Shields, MD, PhD, about the realities of treating patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in the community setting and how emerging therapies are shaping care delivery. Dr Shields is a translational medical oncologist at Indiana University Health in Indianapolis. In our exclusive interview, Dr Shields highlighted the urgency associated with SCLC treatment, an aggressive malignancy that often presents with rapid symptom onset and widespread metastases. The conversation also underscored the importance of multidisciplinary care. This approach is especially critical in light of expanded treatment options such as chemoimmunotherapy regimens, second-line therapies including tarlatamab-dlle (Imdelltra) and lurbinectedin (Zepzelca), along with clinical trials evaluating antibody-drug conjugates and radioligand therapies.From a practical standpoint, integrating these therapies into the community setting presents logistical challenges. Shields noted that although immunotherapy has been rapidly adopted since its introduction into standard care around 2019, newer agents require additional infrastructure. Education gaps remain another key issue. The growing availability of clinical trials and new treatment strategies makes it essential to guide patients through potential care pathways, helping them understand options across the first-line, maintenance, and relapsed settings.Looking ahead, molecular characterization may play a larger role in shaping treatment strategies. Ongoing research efforts, including cooperative group studies, aim to determine whether these subtypes can guide more personalized treatment approaches in the future. The discussion concluded with a call for continued infrastructure development in community oncology.