Episode 39: A small win and a big loss in the fight against vaccine mandates
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (media.blubrry.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
On Episode 39, we discuss McGill's failed attempt to get an injunction against the protesters occupying campus; we tell you about a disappointing court ruling that upheld a B.C. vaccine mandate; and we explain why an arbitrator found Canada Post's vax mandate unreasonable.
Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:
- City surrendered to Uber's bullying tactics and abandoned Ottawa cabbies, judge rules
- Chris Selley: Cities have made their bylaws into an ass
- A judge ruled that tacos and burritos are sandwiches. What do you think?
- Here’s what I learned from my conversation with Justin Trudeau: There’s only one way to fix Canada and everyone is going to hate it
- Quebec court rejects McGill injunction request to remove encampment
- Canada Post was wrong to suspend unvaccinated remote workers during COVID, arbitrator rules
- Josh Dehaas: Is there a Charter right to campus encampments? Unlikely
- Court upholds B.C.'s COVID-19 health-care vaccine mandate
Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.
The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.