Show overview
Not Reserving Judgment has been publishing since 2023, and across the 3 years since has built a catalogue of 136 episodes. That works out to roughly 100 hours of audio in total. Releases follow a weekly cadence.
Episodes typically run thirty-five to sixty minutes — most land between 37 min and 52 min — though episode length varies meaningfully from one episode to the next. None of the episodes are flagged explicit by the publisher. It is catalogued as a EN-language News show.
The show is actively publishing — the most recent episode landed 2 days ago, with 19 episodes already out so far this year. The busiest year was 2024, with 50 episodes published. Published by Canadian Constitution Foundation.
From the publisher
In each episode of Not Reserving Judgment, Canadian Constitution Foundation Executive Director Joanna Baron, Litigation Director Christine Van Geyn, and Counsel Josh Dehaas walk you though the latest Canadian constitutional law headlines, update you on our litigation, and share our Bad Legal Takes of the Week.
Latest Episodes
View all 136 episodesEpisode 133: Edmonton Police use bodycams with FACIAL RECOGNITION. Plus, Kelowna v 'freedom rallies'
Episode 132: Conservatives and libertarians clash in Ottawa. Plus, a victory for free speech.
Episode 131: Did ARRESTING Professor Widdowson violate the Charter? Plus, N.S. BANS naming kid who die in care.
Episode 130: Liberals to use majority to CENSOR online speech. Plus, court strikes down N.S. woods ban.
Episode 129: Is floor crossing ILLEGAL? Plus, federal research funding BLOCKS non-disabled and men.
Episode 128: Is Canada's high-speed rail plan DOOMED already? Plus, Quebec to BAN prayer in more places.
Episode 127: Bill C-22 would make telecoms TRACK YOUR LOCATION. Plus, getting politics out of education?
In Episode 127, we consider whether Ontario's and Alberta's attempts to get politics out of the classroom will help or hinder freedom of expression. Plus, we explain our concerns with C-22, a federal bill that would require telecom companies to keep track device locations for one year.Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Ford government warns school boards to keep graduation ceremonies ‘apolitical’ (Toronto Star)Bill C-22: An Act respecting lawful access (Parliament of Canada)Ontario education minister tells schools to keep graduation ceremonies strictly ‘apolitical’ (CP24)Alberta Education Bill Entrenches Censorship in Schools (CCLA)'I don't think we need a police state': ATA president worried about Bill 25's impact on schools (Edmonton Journal)Bill 25: An Act to Remove Politics and Ideology from Classrooms and Amend the Education Act, 2026 (Alberta Legislature)Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn, with help from Alexander Surgenor.The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.
Episode 126: Notwithstanding clause on trial. Plus, why YOU may need a No Trespassing sign.
In Episode 126, we explain what happened this week at the Supreme Court in the notwithstanding clause case, we explain why the R v Singer decision means you should consider putting up a No Trespassing sign. Plus, our Bad Legal Takes of the Week.Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:How a ban on religious symbols has triggered a Canadian constitutional debate (BBC)R. v. Singer, 2026 SCC 8 (Supreme Court of Canada)Was Upset By Facebook Post (Blacklock's Reporter)Judge cuts down scope of Calgary bubble zone bylaw; CCF calls on city to fully repeal (TheCCF.ca)Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.
Episode 125: FULL RECAP of N.S. woods ban hearing. Plus, no injunction for Al-Quds Day.
In Episode 125, we give you a full recap of the three-day hearing in Halifax into the constitutionality of Nova Scotia's ban on traveling into the woods, and we explain why Ontario Premier Doug Ford's attempt to shut down the Al-Quds Day protest properly failed. Plus, our Bad Legal Takes of the WeekStories and cases discussed in this week's episode:Final arguments made in Nova Scotia woods ban challenge (CTV News)CCF in Court This Week Challenging Nova Scotia’s Unconstitutional Woods Ban (TheCCF.ca)The Hard Lesson of Al Quds Day: Free Speech Protects the Repugnant (Christine Van Geyn.ca)Al-Quds Day protest proceeds after court rejects Ford’s injunction bid (Global News)Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.
Episode 124: Subsidized Childcare for Refugee CLAIMANTS? Plus, the chances & effects of Alberta separation.
In Episode 124, we explore both the practical and theoretical constitutional consequences of Alberta separation, however unlikely, and particularly for Indigenous groups in that province. Christine explains the recent Kanyinda decision from the Supreme Court of Canada (Quebec (Attorney General) v. Kanyinda, 2026 SCC 7) and it looks like, once again, we have more "bubble zones" to fight.Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:Protecting access to places of worship, schools (BC Gov News)Marc Miller says Musqueam deal has ‘nothing to do with’ private property (Toronto Star)Quebec (Attorney General) v. Kanyinda, 2026 SCC 7 (Supreme Court Judgments)Indigenous Chiefs gather at legislature, pressure Alberta to quash separatism push (Global News)Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.
Episode 123: ABORIGINAL TITLE in Vancouver? Plus, MANDATORY Indigenous course for Ontario lawyers.
In Episode 123, we explain the new agreement between Canada and the Musqueam Nation recognizing Aboriginal title in Greater Vancouver. Plus, we discuss the new mandatory Indigenous cultural course requirement for all lawyers in the Province of Ontario. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:‘Alarming’: Police monitoring released murderer ‘closely’ as community expresses concern (CP24)A Rights Recognition Agreement (Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada) Approval of an Indigenous cultural training course (Law Society of Ontario)What Does the Musqueam Agreement Mean? (Law for Breakfast)Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.
Episode 122: B.C. man must pay teachers $750,000 (!) for statements on gender. Plus, C-9 gets worse!
In Episode 122, we explain why we're horrified that the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal has ordered former school trustee Barry Neufeld to pay teachers $750,000 for his speech. Plus, we update you on a disturbing new way that Bill C-9 could infringe on freedom of expression.Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:Bill C-9 to protect indigenous sacred sites including unmarked graves under new hate crime law and C9 is paused (Western Standard)Former B.C. school trustee ordered to pay $750K in discrimination, hate speech complaint (CTV News)Commissioner welcomes decision protecting LGBTQ people from hate speech (BCHRT)Chris Selley: Nobody wants to work in Ottawa, Ottawa unions say (National Post)Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.
Episode 121: THOUGHT POLICE in Ontario? Plus, Supreme Court finds broad mobility right.
In Episode 121, we explain our concerns over Durham Region's new "non-criminal hate incident" reporting program, we discuss the Supreme Court's decision in Taylor, which finds a broad right to free movement in Canada, and we give you our Bad Legal Takes of the Week.Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:Community-Based Hate Reporting Program (Durham Region)Met Police says it will no longer investigate non-crime hate incidents (BBC)Harry Miller v. The College of Policing (Judiciary.UK)Harry Miller: Legal victory after alleged transphobic tweets (BBC)CCF Writes to Durham Region Questioning New Offensive Speech Reporting Tool (TheCCF.ca)Supreme Court Sides With CCF: Charter Protects Broad Right to Mobility (TheCCF.ca)CCF Demands Winnipeg Scrap Bylaw That Would Silence Protesters (TheCCF.ca)Taylor v. Newfoundland and Labrador (Supreme Court of Canada)Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.
Episode 120: Manitoba EXPROPRIATES private building. Plus, did RCMP violate a journalist's rights?
In Episode 120, we explain our concerns with Manitoba's expropriation of a long-term care home, discuss a lawsuit alleging the RCMP violated the free expression of a journalist documenting a pipeline controversy, and we introduce our new Counsel, Alexander Surgenor.Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:Manitoba government plans to expropriate Lemay Forest, turn it into provincial park (CTV Winnipeg)Media harder to identify, RCMP official tells court in press freedom lawsuit (CBC News)CCF Expanding as Canada’s Leading Civil Liberties Charity – Announcing New Counsel (TheCCF.ca)NDP government uses health system expropriation powers for first time, seizes care home (CTV Winnipeg)Press freedom trial in B.C. Supreme Court could have broad implications for journalists in Canada (APTN)RCMP official says journalists were let into pipeline protest camp unless their story 'beggared belief' (CBC News)Josh Dehaas: Carney asks Parliament to give him the power of a king (National Post)Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.
Episode 119: Smith threatens funding over Liberal-dominated judicial appointments. Plus, plastic ruled toxic.
In Episode 119, we discuss Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatening to withhold funding if Alberta doesn't get more say in judicial appointments. Plus, we explain why we disagree with the Federal Court of Appeal that plastic is "toxic."Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:Danielle Smith calls on Mark Carney to give Alberta more say in selection of judges (Globe and Mail)Federal Court of Appeal Upholds Ottawa’s Listing Plastics “Toxic” (TheCCF.ca)Judge stays case against environmental activists who climbed Montreal bridge over rights violations (CTV News)Gov’t Bending On Plastic Ban (Blacklock's)Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.
Episode 118: Inside the 'right to bike lanes' appeal. Plus, should we ban kids from social media?
In Episode 118, we give you a full recap of Ontario's appeal of a decision that found a law designed to remove bike lanes from Toronto violated the rights to life and security of the person. Plus, we discuss whether government should ban social media for kids under age 14.Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:Toronto cyclists defend bike lane challenge before Ontario's top court (CBC News)Federal officials draft plans to ban social media for children under 14 (Globe and Mail)B.C. woman files lawsuit, claims seizing pets under veterinary care violates Charter rights (CBC News)Cycle Toronto et al. v. Attorney General of Ontario et al., 2025 ONSC 1650 (CanLii)Joanna Baron: The Liberal’s approach to regulating the internet is a disaster. What comes next could be even worse (The Hub)Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.
Episode 117: Will Trudeau & Freeland face JAIL? Plus, Windsor man ARRESTED for skating with sign.
In Episode 117, we tell you about our new case involving a Windsor man arrested for skating while protesting with a sign about the local budget. Plus, we walk you through the Federal Court of Appeal decision that found invoking the Emergencies Act violated Charter rights.Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:Christine Van Geyn: Feds spent millions defending Trudeau's Freedom Convoy crackdown — and lost (National Post)Federal Court of Appeal Emergencies Act Decision: Your Questions Answered (TheCCF.ca)Mississauga resident urges City to rethink oil and gas ads after spotting 'greenwashing' billboard (ThePointer.com)CCF assists Windsor man arrested for peacefully holding sign outside city hall (TheCCF.ca)Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.
Episode 116: Free speech violated at York U? Plus, who will be the new SCC judge?
In Episode 116, we consider whether York University's Student Centre violated the freedom of expression of an MP and students who wanted to hear him speak, plus we speculate about who will be the new Supreme Court of Canada justice after the Hon. Sheilah Martin retires.Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:Conservative MP says York University Student Centre blocked his campus discussion event (National Post)Supreme Court Justice Sheilah Martin to retire in May (Globe and Mail)$50 Fine For Foreign Agents (Blacklock's)Canada not considering a ban on X over deepfake controversy, AI minister says (Toronto Star)Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.
Episode 115: Court AGREES natural garden is speech. Plus, criminalizing 'minimization' of residential schools?
We tell you about Wolf Ruck's successful challenge to Mississauga's anti-weeds bylaw, the dropping of a ticket issued by Kingston police who used a surveillance drone, and a proposal to criminalize "condoning, denial, justification, or minimization" of residential schools.Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:VICTORY: Ontario court strikes down bylaw that let city mow down naturalized garden (TheCCF.ca)CCF Intervenes to Stop Charter Being Stretched to Protect Bike LanesCrown withdraws ticket issued after Kingston police use drone to spy on woman in vehicle (TheCCF.ca)Federal government won’t say whether it will criminalize residential school denials (The Globe and Mail)Toronto lawyer faces criminal contempt proceedings after admitting to misleading court about AI use (Law Times)Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.
Episode 114: Tory MP wants to JAIL those who call for 'intifada.' Plus, Liberals propose special rules for 'femicide'.
On Episode 114, we explain why we think that banning calls to "globalize the intifada" would be counter-productive, we discuss the Liberals' new crime bill that would create special rules for "femicide," and we tell you who was naughty and who was nice for civil liberties in 2025.Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:CCF Unwraps 2025 Naughty & Nice List (TheCCF.ca)'It's just too easy to harm women' — What the numbers tell us about 'femicide' in Canada (National Post)BIll C-16, Protecting Victims Act (Parl.ca)What is in Bill C-16, Ottawa’s legislation that seeks to toughen gender-based violence laws? (Globe and Mail)What does ‘globalise the intifada’ mean, and why does NSW want to ban the chant? (The Guardian)Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.