
Episode 0x11: Corporate Licensing Decisions That Impact the Project's Community
June 7, 20111h 24m
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (faif.us) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
<p>
<a href="https://faif.us/cast-media/FaiF_0x11_Licensing-Community-Impact.ogg"><img alt="[Direct download of cast in Ogg/Vorbis
format]" src="https://faif.us/static/img/cast/audio_ogg_button.png"/></a>
<a href="https://faif.us/cast-media/FaiF_0x11_Licensing-Community-Impact.mp3"><img alt="[Direct download of cast in MP3 format]"
src="https://faif.us/static/img/cast/audio_mp3_button.png"/></a>
</p>
<p>
<p><a href="http://danlynch.org/">Dan Lynch</a> (filling in for Karen)
and <a href="http://ebb.org/bkuhn">Bradley</a> discuss a few examples
where licensing decisions by companies impacts the health of the
software development community.</p>
</p>
<h3>Show Notes:</h3>
<h4>Segment 0 (00:00:36)</h4>
<ul>
<li>Dan interviewed the <a href="http://twit.tv/floss142">CentOS developers on <cite>FLOSS Weekly</cite>.</a> (00:05:52)</li>
<li>Bradley has a <a
href="http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2011/03/11/linux-red-hat-gpl.html">blog
post that describes RHEL licensing model</a>. <a
href="http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2011/03/05/open-core-slur.html">His
previous blog post to that one</a>, while mostly off-topic here, has a
few points of interest. (00:10:36)</li>
<li>Dan Lynch mentioned <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Smoking_Man">The Smoking Man</a>
from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_X-Files"><cite>The X
Files</cite> television series</a>. (00:17:22)</li>
<li>Bradley mentioned that <a href="http://0pointer.de/lennart/">Lennart Poettering</a> is a
Red Hat employee working on <a
href="http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd">systemd</a>,
which is <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd">now in
Fedora</a>, but not in RHEL yet (as far as we know). (00:18:53)</li>
<li>Bradley suggested that developers starting projects read Karsten
Wade's <a href="http://www.theopensourceway.org/book/"><cite>The Open
Source Way</cite></a>, and Karl Fogel's <a
href="http://producingoss.com/"><cite>Producing Open Source Software:
How to Run a Successful Free Software Project</cite></a>, and Bradley's
blog post <a
href="http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2010/06/11/develop-in-public.html">about
developing in public</a>. (00:22:16)</li>
<li>Dan and Bradley briefly discussed copyright abolition. Dan
mentioned <a
href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/pirate-party.html">Stallman's
writing on the Pirate Party's copyright positions</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Segment 1 (00:32:30)</h4>
<ul>
<li>Bradley briefly discussed the <a
href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StarOffice#History">history of
StarOffice</a>, and the <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org">creation of
OpenOffice.org</a>. (00:33:40)</li>
<li>Bradley explained issues related to the <a
href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2011/04/oracle-gives-up-on-ooo-after-community-forks-the-project.ars">LibreOffice
fork of OpenOffice.org</a>. (00:37:30)</li>
<li>Bradley has talked about how <a
href="http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2009/10/16/open-core-shareware.html">proprietary
relicensing is very dangerous</a> (00:39:50)</li>
<li><a
href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/LibreOffice">Fedora</a>,
<a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LibreOffice">Ubuntu</a>, and <a
href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2011/02/novell-opensuse-114-nears-comp.html">OpenSUSE</a>
all switched to LibreOffice as a default. Bradley didn't know at
recording time that the <a
href="http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/openoffice.org">OpenOffice
package in wheezy is a transition package</a> to switch to <a
href="http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libreoffice">LibreOffice</a>. (00:41:24)</li>
<li>Bradley and Dan mentioned <a
href="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2011/06/apache-openoffice.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+robweir%2Fantic-atom+%28Rob+Weir%3A+An+Antic+Disposition%29">a
blog post by IBM's Rob Weir</a> that misquotes the FSF to support IBM's
positions on the OO.o relicensing issue. (00:58:26)</li>
<li>Bradley mentioned the idea that Apache-2.0 work can be relicensed
under LGPLv3-or-later, as <a
href="http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2011/06/01/open-office.html">he
discussed in his blog post about the OO.o relicensing</a>
(01:00:45)</li>
<li>Dan mentioned Jeremy Allison's <a
href="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2011/06/apache-openoffice.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+robweir%2Fantic-atom+%28Rob+Weir%3A+An+Antic+Disposition%29#comment-18413">comment
on the aforementioned post on Rob Weir's blog</a>. (01:02:08)</li>
</ul>
<h4>Segment 2 (01:16:09)</h4>
<p>Bradley thanked Dan, on behalf of Karen, for all his work to make
<cite>Free as in Freedom</cite> possible.</p>
<hr width="80%"/>
<p>Send feedback and comments on the cast
to <a href="mailto:[email protected]"><[email protected]></a>.
You can keep in touch with <a href="https://faif.us">Free as in Freedom</a> on our IRC channel, #faif on irc.freenode.net, and
by <a href="http://identi.ca/conservancy">following Conservancy on
identi.ca</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/conservancy">and Twitter</a>.</p>
<p>Free as in Freedom is produced by <a href="http://danlynch.org/blog/">Dan Lynch</a>
of <a href="http://danlynch.org/">danlynch.org</a>.
Theme
music written and performed
by <a href="http://www.miketarantino.com">Mike Tarantino</a>
with <a href="http://www.charliepaxson.com">Charlie Paxson</a> on drums.</p>
<p><a rel="license"
href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0"
src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png" hspace=10 /></a>
The content
of <span xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" href="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Sound" rel="dc:type">this
audcast</span>, and the accompanying show notes and music are licensed
under the <a rel="license"
href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">Creative
Commons Attribution-Share-Alike 4.0 license (CC BY-SA 4.0)</a>.
</p>
Topics
open sourceopensourcefreesoftwaresoftware freedomlegallawlinuxfreelicensegpllgplagplbsd