PLAY PODCASTS
Can humans judge AI's arguments?

Can humans judge AI's arguments?

Doom Debates!

June 14, 202433m 29s

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (api.substack.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

It’s a monologue episode!

Robin Hanson’s blog: https://OvercomingBias.com

Robin Hanson’s famous concept, the Great Filter: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Filter

Robin Hanson’s groundbreaking 2021 solution to the Fermi Paradox: https://GrabbyAliens.com

Robin Hanson’s conversation with Ronny Fernandez about AI doom from May 2023:

My tweet about whether we can hope to control superintelligent AI by judging its explanations and arguments: https://x.com/liron/status/1798135026166698239

Zvi Mowshowitz’s blog where he posts EXCELLENT weekly AI roundups: https://thezvi.wordpress.com

A takedown of Chris Dixon (Andreessen Horowitz)’s book about the nonsensical “Web3” pitch, which despite being terribly argued, is able to trick a significant number of readers into thinking they just read a good argument: https://www.citationneeded.news/review-read-write-own-by-chris-dixon/(Or maybe you think Chris’s book makes total sense, in which case you can observe that a significant number of smart people somehow don’t get how much sense it makes.)

Eliezer Yudkowsky’s famous post about Newcomb’s Problem: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/6ddcsdA2c2XpNpE5x/newcomb-s-problem-and-regret-of-rationality



Get full access to Doom Debates at lironshapira.substack.com/subscribe