Marc Stevens | Individual Sovereignty vs. Government Enslavement: The Politics of Voluntary Servitude | Part 1 of 2
VERITAS · Mel Hostalrich
July 30, 2011
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (public.manticore.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
Marc Stevens: Individual Sovereignty vs. Government Enslavement: The Politics of Voluntary Servitude
In this interview longtime legal researcher, author and radio host Marc Stevens parses the techniques that government uses on every level in the U.S.A. to intimidate and manipulate individuals into voluntary compliance with a fraudulent system.
Advocating degrees of non-compliance; describing himself as anti-violence, anti-human-farming, Stevens vociferously asserts that:
The federal government has always been a tool of the super wealthy.
All politics is diversion from the reality of the larger construct, away from the underlying violence.
We are participating in our own enslavement; complacent out of fear of reprisal.
Government methods of intimidation into submission are criminal.
While the burden of non-compliance with fraudulent systems lies with the individual, questioning the system at any juncture with judges, police and bureaucrats meets deflection, anger, and is dealt with punitively.
And much more.
In this interview longtime legal researcher, author and radio host Marc Stevens parses the techniques that government uses on every level in the U.S.A. to intimidate and manipulate individuals into voluntary compliance with a fraudulent system.
Advocating degrees of non-compliance; describing himself as anti-violence, anti-human-farming, Stevens vociferously asserts that:
The federal government has always been a tool of the super wealthy.
All politics is diversion from the reality of the larger construct, away from the underlying violence.
We are participating in our own enslavement; complacent out of fear of reprisal.
Government methods of intimidation into submission are criminal.
While the burden of non-compliance with fraudulent systems lies with the individual, questioning the system at any juncture with judges, police and bureaucrats meets deflection, anger, and is dealt with punitively.
And much more.