Truth Jihad Radio

Rumble link Bitchute link TruthJihad linkJim Hogue’s radio program, “House at Pooh Corner”, where he interviewed Daniel Ellsberg and many other whistle-blowers, lasted for 29 years on WGDR-FM (91.1) in Plainfield, Vermont…until Hogue criticized Israel for genocide and got canceled. He now has a television program by the same name with ORCA Media in Montpelier, VT, for which he just interviewed me. Watch the interview above, or scroll down for the transcript. And speaking of people being forced out of American institutions for speaking truth to power: A lawyer looking into 9/11-related academic freedom cases emailed me with Grok’s version of my 2006 academic freedom fight at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The original Grok account was inadequate, as I explained:That account is incomplete and selective. It seems designed to downplay the fact that I was informally banned from the American academy due to pressure from politicians (and behind them, the ADL and ACTA).In fact, I did apply for many academic positions, including at least two at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, after my semester of teaching under fire ended in December 2006, and was always turned down. Prior to the scandal, I had basically never been turned down for any academic position for which I had applied at UW-Madison between 1995 and 2006.I was directly told by Professor Muhammad Memon, and later also by his secretary who was present in department meetings, that the Asian Studies Department, which had hired me to teach Introduction to Islam in 2006, had been ordered by the university administration not to hire me for Fall 2007 (and presumably thereafter).The Grok account deceptively focuses on the fact that I did not apply for the Intro to Islam position for Spring 2007 (I had already lined up a teaching position at Madison College that semester) while ignoring that I did indeed apply for that same UW-Madison Islam position for Fall 2007. As I recall, I submitted that application in the winter of 2007, when the Asian Department met and ultimately chose to hire a less-qualified instructor because, as Professor Memon told me, it was ordered by the administration not to hire me.Additionally, in spring 2006 I was turned down for a tenure-track Islam and Humanities job at University of Wisconsin-Whitewater “illegally and purely due to my political views—you were discriminated against” as then-Dean of Humanities Howard Ross told me. Dr. Ross said the hiring committee judged me the best of the three finalists, and was in the final stages of hiring me when a higher-up (I think it was the university president or provost) ordered them not to hire me due to my “screwy views about 9/11.” According to Dr. Ross, the University was forced to return a half-million dollar grant to the federal government and close the position and claim there was no qualified applicant.The same thing happened when I applied to a similar federally-funded Islam and Humanities position at the University of Illinois in 2007. Despite being eminently qualified, with an Islamic Studies related Ph.D. and professional experience teaching Humanities, I was again turned down, and the university closed the position, claimed there were no qualified applicants, and returned the money to the feds.Between 2007 and 2010 I applied for numerous academic jobs in the US for which I was highly qualified and was always turned down, except once when I was hired at the somewhat dubious Kaplan University in Milwaukee by an African guy who didn’t understand the nuances of politically-based informal bannings-from-academia. When he left that job and an American replaced him, the replacement googled me, panicked, and let me know I shouldn’t apply for the following year.So the narrative that “the University of Wisconsin respected my academic freedom by allowing me to finish teaching the fall 2006 semester” is a half truth at best, since it ignores the fact that I was subsequently informally blacklisted from the American academy, as any honest academician familiar with the case will admit.KevinAfter feeding in corrections, the next Grok version was better: From Grok:Publicly available information on Kevin Barrett largely aligns with the key elements of the account you described, while also showing the university’s public rationale for its decisions.badgerherald.comBarrett, who holds a Ph.D. in Islamic Studies from UW-Madison, taught the one-semester course “Islam: Religion and Culture” (Introduction to Islam) in Fall 2006 as a part-time lecturer in the Department of Languages and Cultures of Asia (then Asian Studies). His public 9/11 views (that the attacks were an “inside job”) triggered intense external pressure: more than 60 Wisconsin state legislators signed petitions/letters demanding his firing, Rep. Steve Nass (R-Whitewater) was especially vocal, and groups including the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) criticized the university. The American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA) also weighed in

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News linkE. Michael Jones discusses his new article “Lust Darkens the Mind”, and breaks down the week’s news, in the above-linked episode of False Flag Weekly News. -KBMore and more Americans are asking: What, exactly, are we doing in Iran? Apologists for the war say: “We need to open the Strait of Hormuz! It’s a critical geostrategic choke point! The dastardly Iranians have closed it!”But before the US and Israel launched a cowardly sneak attack that murdered more than 150 schoolgirls, an 86-year-old Supreme Leader with terminal cancer, his daughter, son-in-law, little grandaughter, and many other innocent people, the Strait of Hormuz was wide open, and nobody was planning to close it. So if “opening the Strait” is the goal, the warmongers are trying to solve a problem that they themselves needlessly created.The war apologists then shift gears: “We need to protect the Gulf states and our military bases. The Iranians are pounding them!” But once again, that’s circular logic. Had the US not attacked Iran, US military bases occupying America’s Persian Gulf colonies would not be under attack. Nor would there be any imminent threat to the infrastructure, including the crucial energy infrastructure, of those colonies.“But if we stop escalating and retreat, Iran will emerge as a regional hegemon!” Again, that never would have happened if you had not attacked them in the first place.The apologists retreat to the fallback argument: “Iran was threatening to develop nuclear weapons!” But that is not true. Once again, by attacking Iran, the US and Israel created the problem they claim they’re trying to solve. Iran’s late Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Syed Ali Khamenei, had issued a fatwa forbidding all forms of WMD including nuclear weapons. But that fatwa was only valid during his lifetime. By killing him, the US and Israel removed the most serious obstacle to any prospective Iranian nuclear weapons program. The warmongers claim that by enriching uranium to 60%, far above what is necessary for nuclear energy or medicine, Iran showed it was pursuing nuclear weapons. They forget that the only reason Iran was doing that was because Trump had needlessly and stupidly shredded the JCPOA nuclear agreement. Under that agreement, Iran was strictly limited to enriching to no more than 3.67%, and the most intrusive inspections regime in history ensured full compliance. But if it wasn’t interested in nukes, why would Iran react to Trump’s betrayal of the JCPOA agreement by enriching to 60%? First, Iran wanted leverage to get sanctions relief. Neither Obama not Trump had honored the JCPOA’s provisions obliging the US to drop its economic sanctions. Iran felt the need to convey a clear message to the Americans: “We gave up something up by restricting our nuclear program, but you have to honor your promise to give something up too, by ending sanctions.”Secondly, Iran’s nuclear program presents a vague but meaningful deterrent to any prospective Israeli nuclear attack on Iran or its allies. With its robust nuclear program featuring plenty of know-how and equipment, Iran has put Israel in a position where it knows that if it uses nuclear weapons against Iran, Iran might rescind its WMD prohibition, engage in a crash program to quickly develop nukes, and retaliate. Thanks to Trump’s shredding the JCPOA, Iran now has plenty of 60%-enriched-uranium and could produce a dozen nuclear bombs fairly quickly in order to retaliate if it were itself attacked with nuclear weapons. (For details, listen to nuclear weapons expert Ted Postol.)So the nuclear issue, too, represents a case of US aggression creating the problem it pretends to be trying to solve. The self-proclaimed “very stable genius” Trump has taken a few minor non-problems and turned them into the mother of all quagmires.“We’ve taken away their incentive not to have a nuclear weapon. So we will start to worry as each week goes by, not because we have great intel, not because we’re human. It’s because of the opposite. We don’t have the exquisite intelligence we had with the Obama deal to know we had frozen the program. Now that we have Swiss cheese at best, And what we will see in the holes of the Swiss cheese are indications of nuclear development.” -Robert PapeSince all of the above-listed rationales for war on Iran are absurdly circular and transparently preposterous, it seems unlikely that any serious people in the American National Security State believe them. They must know that Trump’s war on Iran is inflicting catastrophic damage on US interests. And though they are not allowed to say it out loud unless they resign, as Joe Kent did, they undoubtedly know that the real Commander-in-Chief of this war is Benjamin Netanyahu, who is rolling the dice in what amounts to a long-shot gamble aimed at paving the way to a Biblically-inspired Greater Israel aspiring to regional if not global hegemony while expanding to occupy all of the land between

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News linkDear Trump, you senile old pedophile, what in Epstein’s name were you thinking when you gave the order to attack Iran? Or more pertinently, since you’re incapable of anything remotely resembling thinking, who in Epstein’s name were you listening to, and why were you listening to them?Last week you blurted out that Jared, Steve, Pete, and Marco assured you it would be a cakewalk. But your military and intelligence chiefs advised against it. So who are you gonna believe, a pair of Jewish real estate shysters, an alcoholic former Fox News host, and an oily Israeli-owned gusano political operative—or your military and intelligence chiefs?You have a problem, Mr. Senile Pedophile President. Several, actually. First, you’re a complete moron. Second, being a moron, you have no choice but to rely on others’ ideas, since you have none of your own. And third, you are a pathological narcissist, so you only listen to people who flatter your vanity. And since you’re a moron with nothing whatsoever worth being vain about, your flatterers lie outrageously. That’s why you’re surrounded by the most pathetic gaggle of lying ass-kissers ever to cluster like flies around a piece of human s**t.I repeat: Everyone around you is lying to you. It isn’t just your fellow imbeciles like Kushner, Witkoff, Hegseth and Rubio passing on made-in-Israel whoppers about how easy it would be to conquer Iran. Even your military and intelligence chiefs lied by understating how bad an idea attacking Iran really was. They knew you liked the idea, that Jared and Bibi were egging you on, and that if they told you the honest-to-God truth you would flip out and maybe even fire them. So they sugar-coated it. They said “well, it’s a lot harder than it looks, and there’s a big potential downside, but if Jared and Bibi are right and the Iranian people really do thank you for killing their Supreme Leader, and they replace him with somebody who loves America and Israel, that would be great! Let’s hope and pray we don’t need a plan B, because there really isn’t much of one. But hey, we’re the greatest military in the world, and you’re the greatest Commander-in-Chief, so we’ll do our best.” If they even brought up the Strait of Hormuz, they probably said something like: “Well, I guess we can cross that Strait when we come to it.” And the problem is actually even worse than that. It isn’t just that everybody’s lying to you. It’s that you’re lying to yourself. You’ve been lying to yourself so long it’s become second nature. As a pathological narcissist, you have a built-in filter that adjusts every word and image and emotion that passes through your consciousness in such a way as to crank out maximum self-aggrandizement. For you, anything you’re involved in, anything you can take credit for, is the biggest, most beautiful thing that anybody’s ever seen. Nobody’s ever seen anything like it! You fancy yourself “a very stable genius” with a “very, very large brain,” meaning you’re too damn dumb to know how stupid you are. Everybody who doesn’t flatter and obey you is “vicious,” “horrible,” “the absolute worst,” or, as you recently termed Iranians, “deranged scumbags” with inferior DNA.So with your particular brand of psychopathology, Mr. Senile Old Pedophile-in-Chief, how are you going to admit defeat? Being congenitally incapable of admitting you were wrong, that you made a mistake, that you ever did anything less than brilliant, or even that you lost an election—you obviously will always claim that any election you lost was stolen from you, whether or not it actually was—how are you going to face up to the reality that Iran has well and truly kicked your sorry old senile pedophile ass? Especially when your advisors are afraid to tell you anything remotely close to the truth? The answer, of course, is: you won’t. You will keep throwing good money after bad, keep digging yourself deeper and deeper into the hole that Jared and Steve and Bibi convinced you to begin excavating, until you have destroyed yourself and your country, and possibly the world as well.Since I hate to end on such a gloomy note, let me offer you a way out: Declare victory and leave. Call a press conference and announce that you’ve made the biggest, most beautiful peace deal ever, bigger and more beautiful than anybody has ever seen: You’ve convinced those poor Iranian, Chinese, and Russian schmucks to assume the burden of providing security for the Middle East in general and the Strait of Hormuz in particular. From now on, American taxpayers won’t have to foot the bill! Beginning tomorrow, all US military personnel and as much equipment as we can pack up and carry will be leaving the region posthaste. Those Iranian, Chinese, and Russian suckers, maybe with some help from some other losers like the Turks and Iraqis and Gulf Arabs and whoever else wants to pitch in, will be stuck with the tab. Good riddance! And by the way, we’re also going to f

Original YouTube link Rumble link Bitchute linkFoad of FoadDebate writes: In my latest conversation with Dr. Kevin Barrett, we unpacked the hidden dimensions and far-reaching implications of Iran's new leadership selection, a development that has not only shaken domestic dynamics but has also sent shockwaves through the calculations of global powers. With his characteristic sharp insight, Barrett describes Western media attempts to delegitimize this choice as textbook war propaganda, completely at odds with the realities on the ground and the public embrace of Iran's revolutionary path. Dismissing Trump's interventionist rhetoric about the new leader being "unacceptable," he frames such statements as a theatrical display of a declining U.S. hegemony. Barrett emphasizes that the selection of Ayatollah Seyed Mojtaba Khamenei, given the impeccable ethical track record and integrity of his family, is not only a strategic necessity amid the current full-scale war but also a powerful promise to continue the steadfast revolutionary line that has stood firm against Western overreach.Structured Summary of the InterviewIntroduction and Topic: Leadership Transition in Iran (00:00:00–00:00:33)The interview opens with the host welcoming viewers and introducing the topic: the selection of Sayyid Mojtaba Khamenei as Iran’s new Supreme Leader following the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The host asks Dr. Kevin Barrett to comment on criticisms from opponents of the Islamic Republic who argue that Mojtaba Khamenei’s appointment lacks legitimacy, particularly because he is the son of the previous leader.Barrett thanks the host and frames the discussion within the broader geopolitical context of the ongoing war involving Iran and its adversaries.Western Criticism and Allegations of Propaganda (00:00:33–00:03:02)Barrett argues that criticism of Mojtaba Khamenei’s leadership in Western media is part of a broader propaganda campaign connected to the war. According to him, Western governments and media outlets are attempting to portray events in a way that makes the United States and Israel appear successful while simultaneously undermining Iran’s leadership.He claims these narratives are intended to weaken Iran politically by questioning the legitimacy of its political system. Barrett argues that such efforts are unlikely to succeed because most Americans know little about Iran and therefore are not deeply influenced by these narratives.He also argues that within Iran, wartime conditions tend to increase unity around the national leadership rather than weaken it.Regime Change Narratives and Alternative Leadership (00:03:02–00:04:30)Barrett discusses what he sees as unrealistic Western attempts to promote regime change in Iran. He claims that the main alternatives often proposed by Western policymakers—the return of the Pahlavi monarchy or the leadership of the Mujahideen-e Khalq (MEK)—lack credibility and popularity within Iran.According to Barrett, these groups are widely disliked by Iranians, making them ineffective as potential replacements for the Islamic Republic. He therefore interprets regime-change rhetoric as largely symbolic rather than a serious strategy.He argues that the real goal of the war has been to damage Iran strategically rather than to genuinely replace its government.Domestic Legitimacy and Reputation of the Khamenei Family (00:04:30–00:05:03)Barrett emphasizes that the Khamenei family has a reputation in Iran for personal integrity. He states that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was widely known for avoiding corruption and encouraging members of his family to maintain similar standards.Because corruption is a common issue in many countries, Barrett argues that the perception of honesty within the Khamenei family has helped maintain their credibility. He also notes that Mojtaba Khamenei is reportedly respected by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which plays a crucial role in defending Iran during wartime.For these reasons, Barrett believes the new leader is likely to have strong domestic legitimacy.Donald Trump’s Statements and U.S. Pressure (00:04:33–00:08:39)The host asks Barrett about statements by Donald Trump, who reportedly declared that Mojtaba Khamenei would be unacceptable as Iran’s next leader and suggested using a “Venezuela model” to change Iran’s leadership.Barrett strongly criticizes Trump and characterizes his remarks as attempts to intimidate foreign governments. He argues that powerful states sometimes try to pressure other countries into accepting leaders favorable to their interests.However, Barrett claims such tactics will not work with Iran because the country is politically and militarily resilient. He also argues that global respect for American leadership has declined and that Trump’s rhetoric illustrates that decline.Barrett further claims that the United States is losing influence in the region, citing difficulties maintaining control over strategic areas such as the Persian G

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News linkIn this week’s False Flag Weekly News, Helen Buyniski and I discussed Helen’s new article Grand Theft Reality. We also discussed Trump’s moronic war on Iran, which is rapidly turning into the mother of all fiascos for the US and its Israeli master.Since we began the show discussing how AI slop is devouring the world, I decided to send out two items, a satire and a summary, one written by a human, namely me, and the other by an AI. Can you tell which is which?-KBTrump Wants Epstein to Pick Iran’s New Supreme LeaderDissociated PressIn a White House press conference this morning, US President Donald Trump demanded that Iran allow Jeffrey Epstein to select its new Supreme Leader.“If Iran picks a leader who has never raped 13-year-olds in front of Mossad spy cameras, Bibi will force the US back into war in a few years,” Trump explained.Asked how Epstein could participate in the selection process given that he supposedly hanged himself, Trump chortled. “Jeffrey is alive and well, I can assure you. He’s living in a specially-outfitted Iranian-missile-proof child-rape-bunker in Tel Aviv. He can fly to Tehran at a moment’s notice with underage sex slaves and cameras, lighting equipment, viagra, and other essentials for filming Iranian leaders raping children, just like he filmed me.”Trump ordered Iran not to appoint the late Supreme Leader’s son, Mojtaba Khamenei, who has been profiled by US and Israeli intelligence as someone who would never rape children in front of Mossad spy cameras.Trump said the US and its Israeli masters have long been grooming candidates for leadership positions in Iran, adding: “But most of them are dead. The Iranians keep executing them when they get caught raping children. Can you imagine! The Iranians are crazy. What a bunch of losers. They’re a vicious group of terrible people. The Middle East and the world won’t be safe until Iran has leaders who rape children for Israel like ours do.”In Tehran, a spokesman for the Council of Experts responded by texting a photo to the White House. The photo is currently being studied by the intelligence community in hopes that it will yield clues about whether the Iranians might be open to Trump’s Epstein overtures.False Flag Weekly News – SummaryOpening and AI Discussion (≈00:00–05:00)The episode begins with host Kevin Barrett welcoming journalist Helen Buyniski back to False Flag Weekly News. They briefly promote the show and invite viewers to support it financially before turning to the main discussion: artificial intelligence and its growing influence.Buyniski has written a new article titled Grand Theft Reality, which critiques the rapid expansion of AI-generated media. She argues that the scale of content production made possible by AI systems allows organizations to flood social media with competing narratives and alternate “realities.” In the time it takes a human to perform a simple task, AI systems can generate massive amounts of persuasive content.The two compare this phenomenon to science-fiction imagery from writers like H. P. Lovecraft. They argue that AI creates an illusion of intelligence because it excels at language manipulation, but does not actually understand meaning. According to Buyniski, language models merely reproduce patterns in text rather than comprehending the concepts behind them.Barrett notes that AI can be useful for certain purposes—such as language learning, translation, or studying linguistic patterns. Buyniski agrees, but warns that such capabilities also create the illusion of consciousness. When AI systems are tested in simulated scenarios, she claims, they may make extreme decisions because they do not understand moral context.AI Economics, Surveillance, and Privacy (≈05:00–11:00)The conversation shifts toward the economics and infrastructure behind AI technology. Barrett and Buyniski discuss the enormous valuations of technology companies involved in AI development, suggesting that the sector may represent a speculative bubble. They mention companies producing specialized computer chips required to train and run AI models and claim these resources are being priced in ways that limit independent experimentation.Buyniski argues that AI technology has created a new kind of data-harvesting economy in which companies encourage people to feed personal information into automated systems. Many enthusiasts, she says, openly share sensitive details with AI tools in exchange for convenience.She criticizes the idea—often promoted in the tech industry—that privacy is obsolete. Instead, she views this trend as part of a broader normalization of surveillance.Another issue discussed is “model collapse.” The hosts explain that AI systems learn from existing text on the internet. As more AI-generated content fills the internet, future AI systems increasingly train on material produced by other AI systems rather than original human writing. According to their interpretation, th

Red Pill Diaries Youtube link Rumble link Bitchute linkLast night’s interview with Rasheed Muhammad of The Red Pill Diaries covered the background, current status, and likely future of #OperationEpsteinFury. Audio and video above, transcript below. -KBWe are now live, and I want to thank each and every one of you for joining me on another edition of the Red Pill Diaries. I’m your host, your brother and your friend, Rasheed. And without any further ado, I’d like to bring in a person that I personally think knows a lot about the situation with Iran because he’s done a lot of guest appearances on Press TV, and he’s done a lot of writings and everything. I gotta bring in Professor Kevin Barrett, and I’d like to say to you all, Bismillahirrahmanirrahim.As-salamu alaykum, Rashid. How are you doing?I’m doing pretty good. Yes, sir. And shukran for joining me today on the platform. I know there’s a lot going on, but I know that you can probably make a little heads or tails of what’s going on. Could you please give us your perspective on what is taking place in West Asia right now?Well, this looks like it could be the big one. That is, the war that brings down not just the U.S. empire, but 500 years of European world hegemony. I wrote an article to that effect a few days ago. I think that the Zionist crazies have bit off more than they can chew this time. And basically what we have is Operation Epstein Fury with blackmailed child rapist Trump being pushed into a politically disastrous war that’s also going to be militarily and economically disastrous.It comes at a moment that the United States empire is facing a crisis. It’s been eclipsed by China in terms of manufacturing, economy, technology. And its vassal states in Europe have been killed off by the stupid American war on Russia through Ukraine. And there’s a huge economic bubble that’s about to pop. This AI bubble is looking extremely fragile. And you put all this together and then you have this war that they can’t win because Iran can shut down the Gulf and keep the oil from flowing, drive the oil prices higher, higher and higher, and keep pounding American bases. The Americans are going to run out of ammunition in a couple of weeks. And at that point, Iranians can just finish off all those bases. And so it’s a completely bizarre situation. It’s a head scratcher as to how the strategic geniuses have managed to march Western civilization over the cliff. But there you have it.And, you know, I remember when we’ve talked several times and we’ve had multiple conversations together. And I remember one time on the first show that we did, first or second show, you were telling me just how filthy Trump is and how in bed he is with all of these, quote unquote, people from the swamp. Why do you think that nobody tried to pay heed to you when you were telling the people how Trump made his money? How did he rub elbows with all of these other people? Because you said this on my show. You were telling people about Hillary Clinton. You were telling them about Joe Biden, and you really told them about Trump. Why didn’t they take heed? Why did they believe in the no more wars, no more eternal wars, and that I’m going to make America great again? And when you answer that, I’m going to get off the screen for a minute. I hear my car alarm going off, and I want to shut it off while you’re talking.Okay, great, I’ll do a monologue for you then, and you can get that alarm taken care of.Yeah, so why won’t the Trump fanboys wake up and figure this out? Well, a lot of them are. More and more of them are. But I’ve been screaming from the rooftops about 9/11 since the end of 2003, about Epstein since 2008. Catching on to things a little bit before most people do is, I guess, part of the job description. So, but yeah, with Trump, it was pretty obvious that there was a huge swamp issue around him from early on.And I have to credit my colleague, Gordon Duff at Veterans Today, for this. Gordon is kind of all over the map on a lot of things. And I don’t agree with him about certain things. And he’s got a bit of PTSD from a very crazy career in the Marine Corps and the CIA Black Ops Division. And he’s for real. I’ve seen his Rolodex. I’ve seen him pull up these high-ranking people for me to talk to on Skype and stuff. So he’s not like some crazy guy pretending he’s a CIA vet. He’s a real CIA vet.And anyway, back in 2015, when Trump started running for office, Gordon just pulled up all this stuff. And then Katie, the 13-year-old that Trump so brutally raped, sued him. And that court case was there in like 2016, 2015, or 16. And the story of Roy Cohn and how he created Donald Trump as a made man in the kosher Nostra Jewish Mafia was being splashed all over the pages of Veterans Today back then. So I’ve got to credit Gordon for pointing me in the right direction there. But it’s really all out there. That information is not a secret.It’s just that when you find mainstream sources about Trump being fo

Rumble link Bitchute linkI joined the Richie Allen Show last night to talk about #OperationEpsteinFury.Transcript:Richie Allen: I need to go back to my history lecturers and demand my money back. Really? In 1953, the UK got involved. My God. Just listen to that again. I can’t believe it. I mean, this guy will be earning £200,000 to £300,000 a year for this. It is staggering.Interviewer: The history of Iran. Who put the Shah in power? British official: In 1953 was when the United Kingdom got involved and voted out the Prime Minister. That’s how it is reported. I didn’t realise the United Kingdom had the power to vote out Mohamed Mosaddegh in 1953.Let’s welcome back to the programme a broadcaster, writer and former lecturer. Our friend Kevin Barrett was in Morocco today. Kevin, welcome back. How are you?Kevin Barrett: Hey, I’m doing okay, Richie. I’m foregoing some body surfing to be on your program. It’s a windy, wild day here at the Mediterranean coast in Saidia, and I body surfed yesterday, but today here I am for you.Richie Allen: Thanks, mate. Appreciate it. And it is the holy month of Ramadan as well, so I know you’re busy.Did you ever hear anything like that from a commercial national broadcaster? The UK got involved and helped to vote out the Iranian Prime Minister? Is that how you remember it, Kevin? When you went to school, when you learned history? Is that what happened in 1953 in Iran? It’s astonishing, isn’t it? This really is it now, isn’t it? We really have arrived here.Kevin Barrett: It should be astonishing, Richie, but it doesn’t astonish me much because the tapes that you played had so many other outrageous lies. Basically everything that the media says about Iran is at least as big a lie as the claim that the UK voted out the Prime Minister of Iran in 1953.You know, I’ve been to Iran many, many times. I think nine times, actually, starting in 2013 and most recently, I think, like two or three years ago. The reality there is so completely different from the media portrayals that it’s just completely stunning.This notion that it’s a dictatorship is a joke. It’s vastly more democratic than any Western nation, just night and day. The freedom to express and hold different opinions is off the charts, vastly beyond anything in the West. There are a lot of different opinions, but basically at least about a third of the population is really hardcore, well-organized supporters of the purest version of the Islamic Revolution. Fifty percent of the population is more or less kind of, hey, we’re patriotic Iranians and we have this or that issue or what have you. Maybe twenty percent are somewhat at least open to the idea that we would like a more westernized country. But of that tiny twenty percent minority, which is mostly rich people in North Tehran and places like that, only a minuscule fraction is in any sense actively involved in joining in with the Americans and the Israelis in their terrorist assaults on the Islamic Republic.Just wrap your mind around this, Richie. There are basically two groups that the West is trying to regime change into power in Iran: the Pahlavi dictatorship that ninety-five percent of the people in Iran absolutely hate, and the MEK terrorist cult that makes Charlie Manson look like Mother Teresa. Ninety-nine percent of the Iranians in Iran hate the MEK. It’s as if somebody was trying to regime change America and put ISIS into power or something. Americans obviously would roll their eyeballs, and that’s exactly how Iranians react to all of this propaganda that’s being beamed into Iran through CIA media, where they hire these Iranian gusanos from the Shah’s family and other Epstein-class people and try to propagandize the Iranian people. It doesn’t work. They’re drinking their own Kool-Aid, swallowing their own propaganda, believing this nonsense that people in Iran would like to change their form of government, which they absolutely will not. Now that they’ve been attacked like this, that just gave the Islamic Revolution, the most hardcore possible version of it, a new fifty- or hundred-year lease on life.Richie Allen: Kevin has written about this in a very interesting and well-written, thought-provoking article on his Substack page, kevinbarrett.substack.com.Kevin and myself are not going to butt heads today. People will be listening to this and you will have heard me criticise a BBC reporter earlier for not challenging her guest. I don’t need to do what Kevin and myself have done many times before. I wouldn’t characterize life in Iran as Kevin has. Now, I’ve not been there. He’s been there. He’s experienced it. You should go there. Do you know, I’d love to someday, and I do mean that. But I’m not going to waste any time getting into the ins and outs about what life is like for people in Iran, secular people or non-religious people, because for me that’s a discussion for another day.Kevin Barrett: It’s fine. I hang out with secular people in Tehran. My friend’s family is se

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News linkState Department whistleblower Dr. J. Michael Springmann joins FFWN to break down the week’s news.Transcript:Kevin Barrett: Welcome to False Flag Weekly News, the weekly news show that plows ahead with more evil Epstein–Iran news. That’s our big theme this week, and lots of other interesting—and worse than interesting—stuff. I’m Kevin Barrett with Dr. J. Michael Springman. How’s it going, J. Mike?J. Michael Springmann: Oh, I’m quite happy to be here. The snow has finally melted and they’re predicting five more inches starting on Sunday, so we shall see.Okay, I will think of you while I’m running on the beach and frolicking in the Mediterranean. It’s a little chilly for Morocco here, but chilly for Morocco is nice and balmy for America. Well, here’s the fleet steaming towards Iran, flying their Epstein flags, I guess. That’s a nice touch, Trump. So that’s our image of the week.So here we are: war on Iran. Well, hopefully we’re not quite at war with Iran yet, but it’s looking pretty touch and go at this point. Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz a couple of days ago for drills. They ran drills with Russia. I was on Press TV talking about those drills. Meanwhile, there may be a diplomatic way out. Mike, could Iran send enriched uranium to Russia? Could they figure out a deal?The nuclear issue is not even an issue. Iran doesn’t even really want to build nuclear weapons. They’re happy to let the inspectors inspect. So it comes down to whether Trump is controlled by the Israelis and is forcing these non-negotiable, totally non-starter offers on the Iranians—like “give up all of your missiles, basically have no more military defense, and break all your ties with your regional allies.” We all know that countries are not allowed to have allies! Of course, the Iranians are rolling their eyeballs at that stuff. What do you think, Mike? Are we going to get a deal or not?No, not at all. The Wall Street Journal’s headline was denied this morning by Al-Mayadeen English. Quoting Iranian government sources, they said no, we’re not going to ship our refined uranium to Russia. We’re going to keep it here in the bomb-proof bunkers that TrumpleStiltskin and his magnificent B-2 bombers suddenly couldn’t do anything with. All they did was rearrange some rocks on top of the entrances and maybe bomb whatever was above ground.I don’t think they’re going to ship uranium out of the country this time. They might have done this a couple of years ago if Trump, to use Wayne Madsen’s word, had a thought in his head, or if his controllers or advisors had three brain cells to rub together. But they pushed the Iranians to the point where they’re going to be cooperative on nothing—particularly on things they believe go to their signature on the Non-Proliferation Treaty, which the Israelis flatly refused to sign. The Saudis, with their four to seven nuclear bombs presumably bought from Pakistan, did in fact sign. So it’s going to be an interesting situation when TrumpleStiltskin and his idiots want to cross the Iranian red lines, which they’ve been making very clear for the last several years.As our theme image of this week suggests, it seems like the Epstein affair spinning out of control may have something to do with Trump’s willingness to risk World War III as a diversion. We’ll get more into those details. Here’s what Trump was saying less than a year ago, last summer. This was put out by the White House: “Iran’s nuclear facilities have been obliterated, and suggestions otherwise are fake news.” Why do we have to go back and obliterate them again?Well, he doesn’t know what he’s talking about, and he likes to make these outrageous statements in the vain hope that more than three people will believe him.He’s getting bored of peace, I think. Here he is at the board of peace meeting a couple of nights ago, in a phase of the Gaza peace plan, ensuring a lasting peace. But falling asleep in his own board of peace meeting does make you want to misspell the word “board.”The Ayatollah Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of Iran, is warning that the U.S. warships are basically sitting ducks. They’ve got missiles that can break through any missile defenses, as they showed when they busted through the Iron Dome last June. These aircraft carriers are really kind of asking for trouble, aren’t they, Mike?They sure are. They’re sitting ducks. They’re fat targets. They have to keep a steady course when launching and recovering aircraft, which of course will never reach any significant point in Iran. They have to refuel and refuel and refuel because carrier aircraft have short legs and have to be heavied up because of their essentially controlled crashes and folding wings. If you refuel, you’re flying slow and steady and making a great target for anti-aircraft weapons, whether artillery or missiles. Unless he can make his ships amphibious and walk all the way to Tehran, he’s not going to get very far.Most of the smar

Rumble link Bitchute linkFormer CIA analyst Larry Johnson joined me on Press TV’s Spotlight program to discuss the latest Russia-Iran naval drills and the likelihood of another major US attack on Iran. Transcript:Welcome, everyone. Iran and Russia have held naval exercises in the Sea of Oman and northern Indian Ocean to boost military cooperation and regional security. And topping the drills, maritime counter-piracy and counter-terrorism operations, IRGC forces also closed the Strait of Hormuz for a brief episode during their exercises just a day earlier. Annual drills are meant to send a clear message that the region is capable of providing its own security and stability and does not need or welcome, in fact, foreign players or intervention in this regard. In fact, this Moscow to Iran cooperation is also giving way to the south north south transit corridor, a revolutionary transit route on land to run from St. Petersburg, Russia to the middle of India. And it runs primarily right through Iran, an economic game changer. But first, let’s start with this quick report. Iran and Russia have wrapped up a series of joint naval exercises in the Sea of Oman and the northern Indian Ocean, aimed at boosting military cooperation and maritime security across the region. The drills focused on expanding operational coordination between the two navies, particularly in planning and executing combined missions. Special operations units from the Iranian Army, the IRGC, and the Russian Navy carried out a complex simulation to retake a hijacked vessel. In a coordinated air and sea assault, special forces boarded the target ship, detained the mock hijackers, and secured the vessel.Military officials say the exercises were designed to improve joint readiness in countering maritime threats, including piracy and terrorism.Rear Admiral Hassan Mafzoudlu, spokesperson for the Iran-Russia joint drill, said all planned objectives have been successfully achieved.In the end, all the objectives planned by the designers in the operations room were successfully achieved.The Islamic Republic of Iran Navy routinely participates in various defense diplomacy exercises around the world. Joint exercises with Russia in the Caspian Sea and in southern waters are also part of Iran’s annual defense diplomacy planning. As defense ties between Tehran and Moscow continue to deepen, Russian naval official Alexei Sergeev emphasized that the two countries are capable of addressing a wide range of maritime challenges together, highlighting a growing atmosphere of trust and cooperation. The level of interaction and cooperation between Iran and Russia shows that together we can manage and resolve many maritime and coastal challenges.Moscow is ready to hold joint exercises in any region, including specialized drills such as maritime counterterrorism operations carried out by naval vessels and patrol boats from both countries. With Iran and Russia expanding collaboration across multiple sectors in recent years, the latest Navy drills underscored deepening strategic partnership between the two countries. The exercises also demonstrate the ability of both countries to safeguard regional maritime security without reliance on outside powers. The drills come at a time of heightened tensions in the region, as the United States has stepped up its threats against Iran in recent weeks. Tehran has asserted that it is fully prepared to respond to any force threatening its sovereignty and territorial integrity.And now for our guests for our program. Joining us, Mr. Larry Johnson, former CIA analyst from Florida. And also Kevin Barrett joining us from Saidia, Morocco. Gentlemen, pleasure to have you both. Welcome to our spotlight program. I guess Mr. Johnson, we’ll start with you down there in sunny Florida. Your initial take, please, on these naval drills between Moscow and Tehran and what they signify, especially in the scope of recent tensions.Well, I think it’s important to understand that it’s not just with Russia. China’s also been involved. I mean, China, Russia, and Iran started a series, an annual joint naval exercise. They started that back in 2019. It’s always been scheduled around mid-February to mid-March. And anybody that’s ever been involved with military exercises before knows that the planning for this, they didn’t come up with this because of recent tensions with the United States. These exercises are usually planned days to months in advance.And so it’s a reminder that now because of the tensions, it does take on added importance. It’s possible that they added in an additional dimension to this with just Russia. But you know the Chinese are also in the area. They have a an intelligence ship tailing the US aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln. So I think it’s important to understand that unlike what happened in June’s surprise attack by Israel, Iran now enjoys the full backing of Russia and China, based in part on a trilateral agreement that was assigned at th

Rumble link Bitchute linkDean Radin is the English-speaking world’s leading popularizer of the science of psi and its implications, and the author of many books and scientific papers. He is Chief Scientist at the Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS), Associated Distinguished Professor at the California Institute of Integral Studies, and cofounder and chairman of the neuroengineering company, Cognigenics. He earned a BS and MS in electrical engineering and a PhD in psychology from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. In 2022 he was awarded an Honorary DSc from the Swami Vivekananda University in Bangalore, India. He has worked at AT&T Bell Labs, Princeton University, University of Edinburgh, and SRI International. Welcome to Truth Jihad Audiovisual. I’m Kevin Barrett getting visual here for the first time with Dean Radin. I’ve had him on a few times on audio. And here we are doing actual video and talking about his great new book, The Science of Magic. And the subtitle is How the Mind Weaves the Fabric of Reality. It basically starts with the science of psi, leads us up to magic, and the notion that we’re actually all sort of co-creating the universe through paranormal means. It used to be known as magic. Anyway, it’s a good book, and it’s good to have you back, Dean Radin, welcome.Thank you. It’s good to be here.It’s another fascinating book. I’ve been interested in these topics since high school when I discovered the Encyclopedia of Philosophy’s entry on Psi, which shockingly basically said that, yeah, this has been proven. Unless there’s something very strange going on, clearly Psi has been proven scientifically. This was back in the mid-1970s. And so I looked into it. Wow, that’s interesting. That’s not what I’ve heard from everybody else. And I looked into it and it was true. So I’ve been sort of following that ever since and also have been aware of the fact that we’re sort of influencing reality psychically all the time. And that’s that’s where your book gets to in this kind of second half or third third. So, yeah, let’s talk about that and the wild and crazy implications. Where should we start? You tell the story of how you got into this field in the book. So maybe you can give us the short version.Well, the short version is that like a lot of kids, usually, who start reading science fiction and fairy tales, you can’t help but start wondering if any of that stuff is true. And then you get a little bit older and you start learning about science and you hear pretty uniformly that none of it is true. And so it depends on whether or not you remain with childlike enthusiasm and imagination, or if it gets squashed when you’re a little bit older. So for a lot of people, it gets squashed pretty quick. For some, they never break out of the squashiness and their imagination begins to fail. But for others, many scientists, actually, you’re driven by curiosity, as I am. In which case you simply want to know what’s real, what’s true. And so when you start looking at the scientific evidence, which has been around since the late 1950s, it’s very difficult to reach a conclusion that the phenomena that we’re talking about, psychic phenomena, does not exist or is impossible, because it’s quite clear that it has been happening all the time in human experience, and you could even see it in laboratory tests. So anybody who pays attention to that, as you just said, you are then presented with what amounts to a kind of a paradox, a contrast between we are being told, and yet the evidence is clearly not saying that. This is real. So other questions arise like, well, why are we not being told this? What is something being hidden from us? And so I generally don’t go in that direction. I simply say that science tends to be very skeptical and conservative in terms of what it accepts as being true, which is fine. But once it accounts certain kinds of anomalies, which history again and again shows that’s where the future of science always is, there’s two ways you can respond to it. One is to go with the status quo, so it doesn’t disrupt the possibility of your future employment, and just agree with what everyone else does and says; or follow the anomalies, which entails some risk, but also offers a lot of rewards. So I decided the risk was worth it. So here I am years later, and finding it as interesting and as thrilling as I thought when I was a teenager.Yeah, I agree. Your book is really kind of exciting to read. For somebody like me who’s known about this for a long time, it really is inspiring. It’s actually kind of thrilling to know that we’re somewhere near the edge of a radical change in worldview. Because this can’t be ignored forever. And there are signs, even though it hasn’t exploded into public consciousness the way I expected it would. When I first looked into this in the 1970s and early 1980s, I kind of thought, “well, by the turn of the millennium, this will be pretty widely accepted.” And it seems like it k

Rumble link Bitchute link FouaDebate YouTube linkFoad: In the name of God, the compassionate and merciful, hello everybody, hope you are doing great. You’re watching FoaDebate. Over the past few weeks, the Middle East has witnessed a mix of intense tension and diplomatic movements. On one hand, indirect talks between Iran and the U.S. took place with both sides expressing willingness to continue the dialogue. On the other hand, the Trump administration has ramped up its maximum pressure campaign, sending naval forces to the region and threatening Iran. Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was heeding to Washington to push Tel Aviv’s demands for including Iran’s missile program and regional activities in any potential agreement.In such a heated atmosphere, the key question is, are Tehran and Washington moving forward a new deal? Or is the region on the brink of a full-scale conflict? To explore this, I sit down with Dr. Kevin Barrett, a senior American journalist and well-known political analyst. Welcome back there, Kevin Barrett.Kevin Barrett: Thank you, Fouad. It’s good to be back with you.You’re welcome. As I said, over the past week, we have seen two conflicting signals from the U.S. On one hand, talks in Oman and Trump’s expressing satisfaction with them. and on the other hand, an escalation in military and economic pressure. How do you interpret this duality?Well, I think that Trump is basically conditioned by his history as a kind of a, let’s face it, a somewhat corrupt businessman and indeed a money launderer for organized crime who built up hotel chains and casinos and so on, and took a kind of a bullying approach to business negotiations. He would threaten people and pressure them and try to get the upper hand over them and then try to come out with the best deal that he could, thinking that by applying pressure, he could get better terms in a deal. And so that’s just his standard operating procedure. And for whatever reason, the foreign policy establishment is letting him do that.But I don’t think that we should take the aircraft carriers being sent into the region at face value as preparations for necessarily for war, because frankly, I don’t think that the United States and its Israeli partner, or some would say occupier, is ready for that kind of war. As we saw during the 12-day war in June, Iran, even when taken by surprise by another dastardly surprise attack during what was supposed to be negotiations, was capable of regrouping, and its missile force was extremely formidable, forcing the Israelis to beg for the Americans to give them a face-saving way to end that war.And since the Americans are unable to basically even disable the rocket program in Yemen by Ansar Allah—and Iran is many orders of magnitude more formidable—it seems unlikely that the American leadership is looking forward to a war that would certainly leave a large number of Americans dead with tremendous damage and the prospect of either an American defeat or an attempt to throw good money after bad money and essentially keep digging the hole deeper and deeper and deeper for another forever war, which the U.S. would have no real expectation of winning in any meaningful way.After Trump met Netanyahu, it seemed that Trump’s statement on his platform, Truth Social, and then Netanyahu’s statement in Hebrew just before he got on the plane to go back to Israel, indicated that Netanyahu didn’t get what he wanted, which was a kind of a promise from Trump that Trump would indeed go all the way with a threatened war if Iran didn’t negotiate away its allies and its ballistic missile program, which Iran, of course, will not do.Right. Iran has made it clear that its missile program is never up for negotiation and that uranium enrichment is its non-negotiable right. In contrast, Israel wants these issues included in any agreement and Netanyahu was heading to Washington precisely to push for that. How do you see this fundamental deadlock being broken?I think that it is a situation in which the American leadership has to decide to what extent is it willing to damage American interests and, of course, Trump’s political interests, in service to Israel’s maximum demands. And we’ve seen the Israelis already creating all sorts of problems for American foreign policy. I’m one of many who are known for arguing that Israel was the prime force responsible for the September 11th false flag attack on America, which was designed to drag the U.S. into a war that was supposed to overthrow seven countries in five years. All of those seven countries were viewed as problematic by the Israelis. And Iran was number seven on that list, and by far the most important of those seven countries. This is all according to General Wesley Clark, who was told this shortly after the September 11th attacks by a leading neoconservative.So the Americans allowed themselves to be dragged into that series of wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere around the wor

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News linkE. Michael Jones of Culture Wars breaks down the week's news...starting with the looming confrontation between the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the degenerate Zioligarchy that rules the West. Partial transcript:Kevin Barrett: Welcome to False Flag Weekly News, the weekly news show that just keeps on digging deeper into what’s really going on in the world, as it all gets exposed by some kind of weird Hegelian dialectic…I don’t know (about that) but the guy who does know is my co-host Dr. E. Michael Jones of Culture Wars. Hey Mike, how are you doing? E. Michael Jones: Good. Good to be here.Yeah, it’s weird. It’s like every time you come back, it’s kind of the same, it’s the same but different, right? Like the Epstein story never goes away. The war on Iran by the Epstein oligarchy that runs the West never goes away. And the noticing just keeps on happening...And so anyway, let’s listen to our PSAs. Okay, it’s Valentine’s Day. So give us some love. Send us some money. Well, wait a minute. Love and money, it’s not the same. Anyway, we have some breaking news, Mike. Did you see that Satan has joined the Board of Peace? He will be reporting to his boss, Bibi Netanyahu, I guess.And more breaking news, the conspiracy theorists were right. It turns out that the moon was an inside job. This is the New York Times science section. So that just goes to show it’s not just Epstein. Conspiracy theorists were right about everything.And finally, I don’t know if you’ve been watching Jake TV, Mike. Have you seen this?No, I haven’t seen it. (Watch the full 11:34 JakeTV satirical video at my Substack, reproduced for educational purposes only. Please note that laughing may be illegal in some jurisdictions.)Jake TV: Breaking news. The FBI has just dropped three and a half million documents in the Epstein files mentioning Goyim, pizza and grape soda.Oh, wow. Probably has nothing to do with Israel. Our greatest ally.Of course not. Who doesn’t like pizza?Exactly.John, break it down for us.Chloe and Michael, good morning. Let’s just ask the FBI. How do you like your pizza and grape soda? “Christian white ones only. As young as it gets.” WTF?!…Okay, happy birthday, Islamic Iran. It was the birthday of the Islamic Republic this week. And so we’ve got these birthday cards. I can’t believe that Elon allows Grok to make birthday cards for the Islamic Republic, Mike.Yes, it’s part of the strategy here. He wants controversy and there’s nothing more controversial than Iran at this moment. So I think that’s part of the strategy.There you go. Yeah, I was kind of surprised when Grok did that. So anyway, over in Iran, there were 25 million people in the streets supporting the Islamic Republic on the occasion of its anniversary. And you and I have been in the midst of these crowds. It wasn’t just in Tehran, by the way, but there were actually some like there was a medium size city that had this gigantic crowd. Anyway, so you’ve been in the thick of these crowds, just like I have, Mike. Do you believe this stuff in the Western media that all the Iranian people hate their government?Yes, Mike Huckabee said it. They said the Iranians want to kill us. So it must be true if Mike Huckabee said it.But I was in the protest in first time. And I was surrounded by women in chodors who were chanting, Magh Barg Amariku, death to America. Although I’m told that there’s nuance in Farsi that maybe it doesn’t mean quite that. But anyway, surrounded. And I was the only guy in Tehran wearing a tie. So I began, someone came up to me and said, are you an American? And I thought, maybe I better say I’m a Canadian. So I said, yeah, but I said, yes, I’m an American. And he said, well, I’d like to go to America. So this whole idea that the Iranians want to kill you is false. I experienced it firsthand. I was not killed.When we got back, were you in the bus with me when they took us there? We were surrounded by a mob in that bus. They were plastered…I did feel that my life was in danger there. I thought it was gonna be crushed by the crowd at one moment. And that passed and then we were in the bus and the bus was completely surrounded by people. There were no police, there were no nothing. And if they wanted to overturn the bus, they could have, they could have set it on fire. We all would have died in the bus, but they didn’t. So that was my witness. We somehow survived.And you were even wearing a tie, which is actually in Iranian revolutionary sartorial correctness, ties are not exactly de rigueur. They’re seen as…like it’s the imperialists and the Zionists that lead you around by the neck. That’s their cultural interpretation. But they still are not going to lynch you just because you’re wearing a tie. Actually, they like Americans. They just don’t like our Zionist occupied government. And I don’t either. Right. And they can make a distinction which some people cannot make.Indeed, yeah. Iran is a pretty sophisticated

Rumble link Bitchute linkPress TV: For more on that, we’re joined by Kevin Barrett from Saidia, Morocco. Mr. Barrett, give us your overall thoughts on the questioning at Capitol Hill of Attorney General Pam Bondi. U.S. Democratic lawmakers have echoed a similar sentiment that we’ve been hearing for a while now, that in this case Attorney General Pam Bondi is siding with the perpetrators and not the victims.Kevin Barrett: That shouldn’t be surprising. Pam Bondi had a reputation as a mobbed-up lawyer and prosecutor during her career in Florida. And the fact that Trump chose her as his attorney general tells you everything you need to know about Donald Trump and his lifelong service for the Kosher Nostra, the organized crime organization that’s so strong in New York City that used Trump as a money launderer throughout his career.And these hearings illustrate the extent to which the United States government has turned into a complete clown show. In this case, Pam Bondi was the one with the big red rubber nose, saying the most ridiculous things. Every time she was asked a specific question, she would respond something along the lines of, “you’re a washed up horrible former lawyer, and why aren’t you getting down on your knees and kissing Donald Trump’s feet? Because he’s the greatest president that this country has ever had.” Over and over and over she would respond like this. A five-year-old could do a better job.But getting to the serious issues here, clearly the questioners are right. Bondi has rather incompetently been siding with the perpetrators, not the victims. She wouldn’t even look at the victims that were lined up right behind her during this hearing. And she presided over the release of only half of these six million Epstein files. And she presided over the redaction of the names of perpetrators, not victims. The names of dozens of victims were allowed to slip into the public domain, while perpetrator after perpetrator after perpetrator was blacked out.And it’s hard to tell to what extent this is total incompetence or whether perhaps there is dissension in the Justice Department as some of the lower level people who are charged with going over these files are so horrified by what they see, which essentially indicates that the United States is run by an Israeli Mossad blackmail ring that traffics these young girls to powerful figures and uses the networking power of the billionaire Zionist class that rules the West to continue to subordinate the United States, a country of more than 300 million people, to this tiny little genocidal settler colony squatting in occupied Palestine.And unfortunately, none of the questioners, not even Thomas Massie, were brave enough to point out the elephant in the living room here, which is that the Epstein blackmail ring was run by Israeli intelligence designed to gather compromising material on powerful Americans and other people worldwide in order to perpetuate the rule of this corrupt criminal genocidal state over the West.Press TV: And what about the other half, I could say? It’s around three million other documents that may never be released. What does that say about the initial claim of transparency, which was one of the campaign mottos and slogans that Donald Trump ran on?That’s right. The deadline for the release of all six million Epstein files was December, late December. And so they released only a tiny fraction before the deadline, and they still have only released about half.You know, the West as a place where there’s supposed to be rule of law has turned into a complete joke. You can be jailed in the West for suggesting that only five million nine hundred ninety nine thousand nine hundred and ninety nine Jews were gassed to death during World War II because you’re one short of the holy, sacred, mythical six million figure. But if the law says you have to release all six million Epstein files, you’re allowed to make it three million instead and hide the other three million.What could possibly be in these other three million? We’ve seen the horrors in the ones that they’ve released, which completely indict the entire Western ruling class in this horrific abuse of young girls, and hint at much, much worse.So I don’t know if we’re ever going to see the unredacted version of what’s left in these three million files that are supposed to be and should have been released a month and a half ago. All of these Justice Department people who haven’t released them need to go to jail. But whatever is in them, it must be beyond belief. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link FFWN linkPresident Donald J. Trump is a cornered political animal. In recent days he has come under attack from several directions. The president has been issuing fumbling non-apologies-just-excuses for tweeting an AI video depicting the Obamas as apes. His aides have denied that he defecated in his pants while signing an executive order. They likewise deny that Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico “expressed concerns about Trump’s psychological state” which seemed “dangerous” when they met in Florida January 17.The volley of negative news threatens to accelerate Trump’s dip in popularity following the collapse of his ICE war on the Twin Cities. Potentially even worse news for Trump is the January 30 Epstein files dump. My forthcoming American Free Press article (to get first access to the full article, subscribe) ends:For many Americans, the most disturbing revelations in Epstein files involve President Donald J. Trump. Prior to the files’ release, we already knew that Trump flew on Epstein’s jet at least eight times, was referred to by Epstein as his “best friend,” sent a birthday drawing to Epstein depicting a barely pubescent naked girl alluding to their “secret,” and has been accused of raping 13-year-old “Katie Johnson” in 1994 at an Epstein party and then threatening to kill the girl and her family. The first Epstein dump also contained FBI witness reports that Trump was present when a baby was drowned in Lake Michigan, and was implicated in the rape and murder of a certain Dusty Rhea Duke in 2000.The new Epstein files release includes FBI witness reports that Trump was involved in murdering three girls who were buried at Mar-a-Lago and threatening the witness with a similar fate. Witnesses also told the FBI that Trump auctioned underage girls from his swimsuit contests, measuring their vulvas and rating them for tightness. Trump is also accused of forcing oral sex and other abuses against 13 and 14 year old girls.Meanwhile the mainstream media chant in unison: “President Trump has not been accused of wrongdoing.” Obviously they will change their tune, and suddenly discover the FBI files, if and when Trump stops following Israel’s orders.And Israel wants Trump to attack Iran.That puts Trump between a proverbial rock and a hard place. Attacking Iran would invite disaster: Dead American servicemen, Israel riddled with rocket strikes, US escalation leading to even more dead servicemen and rocket strikes, ad infinitum. Such a war would be a strategic fiasco for the US empire and a political fiasco for Trump.But if Trump refuses to attack Iran, he’ll get Epsteined. The media will magically discover that Trump actually has been accused of serious wrongdoing, and at least some of the accusations (including whatever comes out in the next Epstein dump) are credible.No wonder Trump is sh*tting in his presidential pants.But presidents, unlike the rest of us, have a magical solution that can solve all their problems and then some: They can push the button and watch the planet, and all their troubles, go up in billowing fireballs. For a 79-year-old megalomaniac with both verbal and anal incontinence problems, that “solution” might sound tempting. No wonder Fico is worried. How did we get into this mess? To start with, we let the world’s craziest Jews, the Likudnik neocons, blow up the World Trade Center and blame their enemies. That repeated the mistake made in 1963, another spectacular coup by the same crowd.Letting the unhinged, blatantly narcissistic Kosher Nostra frontman carnival barker Trump anywhere near the Oval Office was almost as monumental a mistake. Hua Bin is right that a “democracy” that produces leaders like Trump (and most of the rest of them) would be better off canceling elections and finding a better way to identify and insert virtuous leaders into office.Hua Bin notes that many columnists at the Unz Review, where we both publish, fell for Trump’s all-too-obvious BS:In the 2024 election, many former Trump critics – both writers and readers on Unz Review – turned into Trump supporters with glowing endorsement of his policy promises and real enthusiasm for the changes they expect him to bring. Compared with Biden and Harris, Trump was not just considered the lesser of the two evils…His campaign promised domestic focus to address immigration issues and wokism. He promised reindustrializing the country and bring jobs back…Trump vowed to end foreign wars and stop military interventions/regime changes…These Unz writers and readers voted for Trump and couldn’t wait to let the world know how Trump was going to be great for the good old USA. They congratulated themselves as smart voters.I have never been a Trump supporter, never voted for him, and have been calling him a sociopathic narcissist and likely Kosher Nostra asset since 2016. Though I admittedly have occasionally found him amusing and even refreshing in his lack of hypocrisy and willingness to say transgressive thing

Rumble link Bitchute linkPress TV: Welcome, everyone. Now, more than three million pages of records by the U.S. Justice Department in a high-profile sex trafficking case has shed light on dozens of powerful figures allegedly connected to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, exposing links to political leaders, royals, diplomats, and corporate elites across multiple continents and their illegal escapades with underage girls. U.S. President Donald Trump Former President Bill Clinton, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, Tesla’s Elon Musk, UK’s Prince Andrew, UK ambassador to the US Peter Mendelsohn, France’s Emmanuel Macron and officials from Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Turkey, Slovakia and all throughout West Asia.But a peculiar number of files lead straight to Tel Aviv. Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak is shown to have stayed at Epstein’s New York apartment on multiple occasions. It’s this intimate relationship and money transfers involving the two of them driving speculation which will be the focus of the spotlight program.But first, here’s a quick report. This is not only a story of a pedophile, sex trafficker and a predator. This is also a story of blackmail, power and foreign influence. The explosive new FBI memo alleges not only that Jeffrey Epstein worked with Mossad, but U.S. President Donald Trump was even compromised by Israel, with Jared Kushner described as the real brains behind the operation.The claims are fueling a firestorm. The memo links Abstein directly to former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, a former military intelligence chief who visited Epstein’s home dozens of times. These revelations come as pressure builds from Epstein’s survivors and U.S. critics, including Tucker Carlson, who openly questions if Epstein was running a Mossad blackmail operation:And moreover, it’s extremely obvious to anyone who watches that this guy had direct connections to a foreign government. Now, no one’s allowed to say that that foreign government is Israel because we have been somehow cowed.The memo also references Epstein’s 2008 sweetheart plea deal where prosecutor Alex Acosta was told that Epstein “belonged to intelligence” and to back off. This pattern of protection continues to date in order to keep the truth hidden:Your memo and release yesterday on Jeffrey Epstein, it left some lingering mysteries. One of the biggest ones is whether he ever worked for an American or foreign intelligence agency. The former labor secretary, who was Miami U.S. attorney, Alex Costa, he allegedly said that he did work for an intelligence agency. So could you resolve whether or not he did? And also, could you say why there was a minute missing from the jailhouse tape?Yeah, sure. Trump (irritated): Could I just interrupt for a second? Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy’s been talked about for years. The released FBI document provides official weight to long-circulating theories. It paints a picture of a compromised U.S. political system where a convicted sex trafficker may have acted as a tool for a foreign ally’s influence, raising grave questions about who truly holds power in Washington.He wasn’t one of ours. So he was an American, which leads basically three options, MI6, Saudi, or Mossad.Yep.Which one would you choose?I guess Mossad, given his connection to Ghislaine Maxwell.The Justice Department and FBI have stated no further significant evidence will be released—a move that has only deepened public suspicion and demands for full transparency.For now, the official record contains a shocking allegation. America’s most infamous predator was an asset of the Israeli regime. And now for our guests for the program. Joining us is Kevin Barrett from Geneva. And also Mr. John Bosnitch, journalist, activist, and political analyst, out of Fredericton, Canada.Hello, gentlemen. Pleasure to have you both join us on our spotlight program. Dr. Barrett, we’ll start with you out there in Geneva. Good to have you. I hope you’re safe and doing well. Your thoughts, please, on all the speculation that Epstein was some kind of intel operative that went on on his island has produced too many files and pictures, over million in just this last release, for it to be just one man’s personal archives or chronicles or personal trove.Kevin Barrett: Well, I’ve been among a small number of people that’s been growing over the years that has been calling Jeffrey Epstein an obvious Israeli Mossad blackmailer since around 2008. I’ve been interviewing people like Nick Bryant, author of the wonderful book The Franklin Scandal, which everybody needs to read to understand how horrifically compromised our political class is in the United States. I’ve long been interviewing Nick Bryant and other very brave journalists who have helped break this story ever since that sham trial in which Alex Acosta gave Epstein a sweetheart deal because he was with intelligence.And just as I’ve been screaming from the rooftops since late 2003 about 9

Rumble link Bitchute link TruthJihad linkFor background on allegations that Trump is being blackmailed by Israel, focusing on the newly-released Epstein files, read “The Epstein Files Show We Are Ruled by Demonic Pedophiles” by Council Estates Media. -KBPress TV: Thousands have taken to the streets of U.S. city of Houston as part of nationwide rallies and protests against President Donald Trump’s anti-immigration crackdown. Gathering outside ICE Detention Center on Friday, Texan protesters held signs and chanted slogans, including No Justice, No Peace. In the city of Los Angeles, thousands of demonstrators gathered at City Hall and marched to a federal detention center. As protests grew into the evening, federal agents used chemical spray to disperse crowds.The demonstrations are part of nationwide strikes where people participate by not going to work, not going to school or shopping. Protests were sparked by the recent killing of Alex Pretti, who was shot dead by Border Patrol officers in Minneapolis. His death follows a January 7th shooting of Renee Good, a mother of three, by an ICE officer, intensifying national outrage over immigration enforcement tactics.And join us for the story out of Marseille, France, Dr. Kevin Barrett. Dr. Barrett, always a pleasure, sir. Good morning to you out there in Marseille. OK, so obviously illegal immigration is an issue that a lot of Americans want to see cleaned up in American cities. Why are they so opposed and coming out in record numbers in so many cities protesting the Trump administration’s handling of removing illegal immigrants from U.S. soil?Kevin Barrett: I think the American people are starting to understand that this isn’t really about the illegal immigrants. Now, not all of them understand that. Many of these protesters think that they’re protecting the illegal immigrants. But some of them do (understand).It’s reached the point now that it’s obvious that these ICE death squads are waging war against whole neighborhoods, against all people that look possibly foreign or have darker skin pigmentation, et cetera. And then they’re also targeting these protesters who come out against them. They’re committing these grotesque abuses, including murder in the cases of Renee Goode and Alex Pretti and others, actually. But those are the two that got captured on video and revealed to the world.So what this is actually doing is turning the American people, especially the middle ground, the independents, the silent majority, against the Trump policy, the ostensible Trump policy, of getting rid of the illegal immigrants. And more and more Americans, including on the right side of the political spectrum, who actually want to crack down on illegal immigration, are scratching their heads and saying, what is this really all about? Sending federal goons in masks without any badges any identification to just attack and abuse people randomly and to grab people off the streets throw them in vans and disappear them, in some cases even murder them, is totally against the American tradition. The Americans have sponsored such activities in other countries, with Latin America being a good example. But it’s shocking to normal Americans to see this (at home). And they’re starting to notice that what this is really about is Trump, or the people around Trump, creating a police state and perhaps preparing to cancel the next round of elections, and perhaps ultimately install Trump as a dictator for life.They’re creating the conditions for a civil war. And most Americans don’t like that. And that’s why we’re seeing so many come out in this general strike.And Dr. Barrett, before we let you go, it seemed like after Rene Good’s killing there in Minneapolis, that Trump kind of loosened the leash on these ICE agents, possibly leading to the death of Alex Preti, or murder, we should say, because everybody’s seen that video. So do you feel he was finally tying that leash, or does he simply not know how to?I think Trump is lashing out blindly in all sorts of ways. And I think part of that is the pressure that’s being applied to him around the Epstein files, which include all sorts of material implicating him in the most horrific crimes imaginable against children and teenagers. And clearly, the state of Israel has blackmailed Trump. Epstein was a blackmailer for the state of Israel.So I think Trump is caught really between the proverbial rock and the hard place. That is, if he tries to pursue more normal and constructive policies, he will be pushed towards fighting the Zionists’ wars. Currently, he’s sending this “big, beautiful armada” to threaten Iran at exactly the moment when these millions of Epstein files are released with hundreds of references to Trump, including some perhaps credible allegations of horrific crimes.So I think Trump is creating distractions: In Venezuela, in Greenland, now sending the “armada” to Iran, and then by waging war on American cities. And part of this is actually due

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News linkFalse Flag Weekly News special! Kevin Barrett joins Laurent Guyénot from an undisclosed location in a bunker deep beneath the Alps.When people say “Europe is committing suicide” they’re usually talking about demographics, meaning low fertility and excessive immigration. But Europe is also committing spiritual and geopolitical suicide. The low fertility that’s the main cause of the demographic problem is a symptom of a spiritual malaise in general and hedonistic, individualistic materialism in particular. Did that stem from the collapse of Christianity, as I generally argue? Or was there already something about Christianity that made Western civilization vulnerable to the Jewish-Zionist criminals who have taken over its commanding heights, as Laurent Guyénot thinks?Geopolitically, too, Europe keeps acting against its own interest. It colludes in the coverup of the destruction of its energy supplies via Biden’s bombing of the Nordstream pipeline, then rabidly cheers on the US war on Russia…which was always also a US war on Europe. Now the US wants out, but Europe wants World War III!Europe allows itself to be occupied by an empire that threatens to attack it in order to seize its territory (I’m talking about the US empire and Greenland, of course). It supports the genocide of Gaza and earns the wrath of the Global South...while destroying its own reputation as the home of international legal institutions like the ICC and ICJ. And now, Europe refuses to profit mightily from establishing trade relations with Iran, and instead shoots itself in the foot by becoming a fanatical cheerleader for looming Zio-American war on Iran. In this episode of False Flag Weekly News, recorded in an undisclosed-location bunker deep beneath the Alps, Laurent Guyénot and I marvel at the insanity of the Zionist-oligarch-owned Trump regime…and the European poodles’ pathetically obsequious pandering to that evil empire. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link TruthJihadRadio linkWho’s irrational, the “conspiracy theorists” or the academicians who are paid to attack them with ad hominems, circular arguments, and other fallacies? I’ve opined on this before. Now let’s find out what a genuine expert—sociologist and expert on conspiracy movements Richard Ellefritz—thinks. He’s an assistant professor of sociology at the University of the Bahamas, and the author of numerous articles on this and related topics.Kevin Barrett: Welcome to Truth Jihad Audiovisual. I’m Kevin Barrett and I’ve been doing this since when Fox News made me too toxic to employ in the academy. So I’ve been pushing back against the dubious portraits of what’s really going on in the world in the mainstream media and academy ever since from outside the academy. But today I’m happy to go back to somebody inside the academy who’s thinking about some of the same things that I think about. That’s Richard Elfritz. He’s a sociologist working at University of the Bahamas who has done participant observation ethnography involving the 9/11 truth movement, which means he hung out with 9/11 truthers and kind of did what they did and observed it just like any other ethnographer would do with a group they were interested in studying. And it’s actually kind of a fascinating topic or confluence of the discipline of ethnography and the 9/11 truth movement. So anyway, I’m really looking forward to this interview. Welcome, Richard Elfritz. How are you doing?Richard Ellefritz: I’m all right. I’m here in sunshiny Bahamas. It’s been cloudy for the last week. You know, apologies to the tourists, but I’ve been working at the University of the Bahamas since fall as a full-time assistant professor of sociology. Prior to that, I worked three years full-time at Oklahoma State University after I earned my PhD there. So they thought I was doing a good enough job. You know, I love what I do teaching sociology, which is, in my opinion, kind of a natural inroad to investigating what are called conspiracy theories. And yeah, that’s that primarily is how I really got interested in studying the 9/11 truth movement, because one of my primary questions is, why are these people called conspiracy theorists?Right. And of course, there are various theories about that, including the infamous CIA memo after the JFK assassination, ordering their media assets to smear people questioning the official story by calling them conspiracy theorists. Is that a conspiracy theory?Well, there’s a there’s a book called The Stigmatization of Conspiracy Theories Since the 1950s: “A Plot to Make us Look Foolish” (by Katharina Thalmann)…the author doesn’t go far enough. Because as I showed in a series of essays published at PropagandaInFocus.com, the CIA did not coin the term conspiracy theory or conspiracy theorist. And the reason that’s important to say is because, as a matter of fact, those terms do appear in some literature and newspapers prior to the release of that CIA memo 1035-960 to their CIA office chiefs overseas.And oftentimes I will hear, and in fact, just last week I was correcting somebody on an essay that they’re publishing: You can’t factually say the CIA coined that term. But what you can say is that the CIA no doubt helped to popularize the term, much like Norman Rockwell and Coca-Cola helped to popularize our modern imagery of Santa Claus.So I think it’s interesting that there’s this academic book out there that claims to have studied the rise of this conspiracy label, as I call it. But then they basically backtrack at a certain point because I think they (Katharina Thalmann) were unwilling, for whatever reason, to just go a little bit deeper. And in my series of essays on the topic, especially in the third installment, I showed that the CIA memo, which anybody can find, very likely led to a regional editorial published by Tom Bethel.Now, Tom Bethel was a very vocal advocate of the Warren Commission that served as the official story of what happened to JFK in November 1963. There are some other blogs and articles I found that drew suspicion that he had direct ties to the CIA. And so he publishes in a regional news outlet in the northwest, I believe, an editorial that then served as the hypothesis for the first psychology publication analyzing conspiracy theories. And so that was in the late 1970s. And they name him, they name his article, they use his postulation, his conjecture in that article as their hypothesis for their theory that big events lead to big explanations. And that logic then was picked up by psychologists in the future to form part of the foundation of the psychologism of conspiracy theories: the claim that the reason that you’re questioning government’s official explanations is because your psychology just can’t handle the fact they say that big events sometimes have small causes, that a kind of a nobody could assassinate a president, that Islamic jihadist terrorists could pull off something as cat

Rumble link Bitchute link TruthJihad linkStephen Miller and his B-grade actor Trump aren’t fighting illegal immigration—they’re fighting the Constitution and trying to establish a dictatorship. That makes them traitors who need to be tried, convicted, and executed.Press TVKevin Barrett: Well, really, the strangest thing about these events is the way they’ve been described by the Trump administration–the president himself and some of his administration members and the people in charge, like Greg Bovino, the commander of the ICE war on the Twin Cities, who has just been essentially relieved of his duties and sent home, apparently, after claiming that Alex Purdy was bent on massacring ICE officers.These kinds of statements from him and from the president himself are so obviously gaslighting American citizens, who can see multiple videos from multiple angles, showing that what happened was that the ICE agents attacked Mr. Pretti and threw him on the ground and gassed him, used chemical weapons on him for no reason whatsoever, threw him on the ground, pulled his gun out, disarmed him, and then shot him multiple times, including in the head, shot him dead.Classic death squad style execution. This is what death squads do in Central America. This is what the mafia does to people that it wants to kill. Normally, it’s not what American police officers do. But things have changed, apparently. This administration has encouraged these ICE agents to behave in ways that would have shamed the Gestapo. And by putting out these bizarre gaslighting statements, Trump and his minions have contributed to eroding what popularity he still has. Currently they’re in full-scale retreat, and the people of the Twin Cities are on the offensive with these protests. And it looks like it’s going to be the people who deport ICE rather than the other way around.Press TV: And if it was a one-time incident, but this is the same exact rhetoric, to your point, that was employed with Renee Good, the mother of three fatality, back on January 7th. She was turning to flee the scene, to leave the area, and the Trump administration, Trump himself and multiple others have said that she was turning to ram and run over that agent that shot her point-blank range in the face.Indeed, that’s what’s so crazy about this. Normally, a presidential administration that was doing this would be much more cautious in its defense of the officials involved. But in this case, they’ve gotten way out ahead of the killings when videos clearly show that these officers are just blatantly executing people who pose no threat whatsoever. These officers get angry because they don’t like protesters impeding their operations by filming them, by following them around and blowing whistles. And so they get angry. And then finally, they just go off and kill people. And that, of course, creates even more protests.So if you’re trying to create a civil war in the United States, perhaps Trump’s strategy makes sense. But as a political strategy aimed at winning Republican majorities in the midterm elections, it makes no sense at all. So maybe Trump wants a civil war so he can call off elections and name himself permanent dictator of the United States in the same way that he’s trying to name himself permanent dictator of the world by replacing the United Nations with a private organization with himself as lifetime self-appointed chairman of the board.This would be humorous—the madness of this megalomaniac who’s in charge of the most powerful military in the world—it would be hilarious if it weren’t threatening to basically destroy civilization.Press TV: And it’s funny because people on both sides of the aisle, you very well know, you’ve lived in the States all your life, as I have, almost 40 years. Both sides, the Democrats, Republicans, independents, whatnot, support strong immigration policy to vet people that come into the States and to remove those who overstay. Yet the way that Donald Trump is doing it, that’s what they don’t agree with. It seems that it’s reflecting badly also on him when it comes to the polls.That’s an excellent point. If Trump really wanted to get rid of illegal immigrants, it would be simple. He would just have Congress pass a law imposing severe penalties on anyone who employs or rents to an illegal immigrant. And they would have no more opportunities to live and work in the United States, and they would go home. And it could be done without any violence, without any serious enforcement operations.But instead, what Trump has done is he’s vastly increased the funding for ICE. He’s hired all of these crazy, hyper-ideological idiots who have no policing skills whatsoever. And he’s turned them loose, goading them on to attack the citizenry. And this has actually hurt the popularity of the Republican position on immigration, which is to reduce illegal immigration, which is a very popular policy, as you said—or it was, anyway, until Trump turned it into an excuse to try

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link Imagine: You work in a lunatic asylum. One of the patients insists he has stopped seven wars and demands the Nobel Peace Prize. What do you do?Your dilemma gets worse when you check his file and discover he’s a senile sociopathic narcissist and suspected rapist-murderer. If you try to deal with him rationally by attempting to help him understand that his belief that he deserves the prize is delusory, he will probably fly into a rage and attack everyone in sight. Maybe you should just “give him the prize.” In other words, humor him.But systematically humoring criminally insane people by giving them everything they want is not a sustainable policy. The 3.8 million square mile lunatic asylum known as the USA has been humoring the criminally insane Donald J. Trump for far too long. The result is clear: A once-great nation is reeling on the brink of unprecedented disaster.I woke up this morning to the news that ICE agents in Minneapolis had committed another death-squad-style murder—and the senile, criminally-insane president had once again lied about it, in an effort to encourage more such executions.The good news is that Trump, who cheered on ICE’s brutal execution of mother-of-two Renée Good, now feels bad about her death. The bad news is that the reason the senile narcissist feels bad is that Good’s parents were Trump supporters.And the really bad news is that Trump is once again lying outrageously to cover up a cold-blooded murder, thereby encouraging ICE death squads to believe the madman-in-chief has their backs when they execute people for protesting their thuggery.This time, the demented POTUS’s mendacious attempts to excuse the murder are even more outlandish. When Trump justified the killing of Renée Good, he could later weakly claim he made a mistake based on being shown only the ICE killer’s video, not the other videos that bely the killer’s ludicrous alibi. The excuse that Renée Good was “trying to run over ICE agents” was obviously false, at least if you do your due diligence. But if you only looked at the killer’s phone video, you might not know that. But the murder of Alex Pretti can’t possibly be seen for anything other than what it was: A death squad execution. Pretty was filming the ICE goons and they didn’t like it, so they gang-tackled him, brutalized him, and shot him dead while they were holding him down. It seems that after tackling Pretty, one of the officers noticed the gun in Pretty’s waistband and screamed “he’s got a gun,” which led other officers to panic and murder the man they were holding down. (New York Times video analysis.) Then they lied and claimed that the camera he’d been pointing at them was a gun. And Trump amplified the lie.Is This Really About Immigrants?Trump wants his supporters to believe that he’s sending crazed brownshirt thugs into American cities to assault, kidnap, and murder people in a good faith effort to rid America of illegal immigrants. But nothing could be further from the truth. Trump is waging a personal vendetta against his political opponents. Jeffrey St. Clair notes:Minnesota’s immigrant population ranks 23rd in the US, far behind red states like Texas, Florida, Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina and Utah. But most of Minnesota’s immigrant population is documented. For example, Minnesota has an estimated total immigrant population of 495,352, but only 77,836 are undocumented (16%) Compare that to the undocumented populations of Florida 1 million (20%), Texas 1.8 million (32%), Arizona 250,00 (25%), Georgia 374,000 (32%), North Carolina 325,00 (34%), Utah 100,000 (33%).I sympathize with MAGA-adjacent people like False Flag Weekly News co-host Dr. J. Michael Springmann who like the idea of sending illegals home. But they seem awfully slow to figure out that trying to grab illegals one-by-one, as Trump is allegedly doing, can’t possibly work. There are 10 to 15 million illegals in the US, maybe more if you believe the alarmists. Trump’s goon squads claim to have arrested 3,000, so far, in Minneapolis. But that claim is undoubtedly exaggerated, and may include all of the countless US citizens who have been caught up in the dragnet then released (or, in a few cases, not released). ICE agents are paid a bonus for every arrest they make, even if the individual is released. So they have a strong financial incentive to randomly snatch people off the streets—an outrageous violation of the 4th Amendment. ICE’s banana-republic-style war on the citizenry of Minneapolis and other cities is creating a thunderous backlash that is turning Americans against immigration enforcement. In the long run, it will make it much harder to maintain non-porous borders and send illegals home. If Trump really wanted to rid the US of illegal immigrants, he would direct Congress to pass legislation imposing severe penalties on anyone who employs or rents to illegals. Unable to work, unable to find housing, the illegals would quick

Rumble link Bitchute linkPress TV: Joining us at the city of Saidia, Morocco is Dr. Kevin Barrett. Dr. Barrett, always a pleasure, sir. Now, this policy of a crackdown on immigration and mass deportations, we saw with the Democrats, we’re seeing with Trump. Why does Trump get so much blowback when what he does it as opposed to that? Is it because of the way he’s deploying in military attire and he’s more in the scene and in the public’s eye?Kevin Barrett: Well, I think Trump actually has gone a couple of steps beyond what his almost equally senile and crazy predecessor was doing in terms of deportations. And the reason is that the blatant illegality of the conduct of these ICE officers, the blatant unconstitutionality, is now fully on display for everyone to see. And that’s led to this backlash.Under previous administrations, although there were plenty of deportations going on, they were following more or less what passes for the rule of law in the United States today, which may not be much, but it’s not absolute and complete chaos and criminal anarchy, which is what we’ve got now. People on X, even though it’s being massively suppressed—you still can’t miss these videos of outrageous violations of people’s Constitutional rights and human rights.Rather than getting a warrant and going after specific people, in calm legal ways, which is what they used to do when they deported people, Trump has sent these barely trained, 50-year-old pot-bellied flunk-outs from the police academy into these neighborhoods to just smash people’s automobile windows, attack them physically, detain them unconstitutionally without any judicial warrant of any kind, based on whim, sometimes having a foreign accent.So it’s an occupation army. It’s an American Gestapo in the streets attacking the American people almost at random. It’s pure political punishment for the city of Minneapolis and other cities which are targeted because they’re Democratic strongholds.And that’s the thing, Doctor, we’re almost out of time. I want to get the second question on to you before we have to wrap it up. Really quick, if you could, please, in about a minute: Why doesn’t he at least deploy them to some Republican-controlled cities as well so he doesn’t look like he’s adding to the polarization of America?Well, that’s a good question. And the answer is that Trump is mentally unwell. He is an extreme sociopathic narcissist who lacks enough reality testing, as the psychologists say, to understand how his actions look to others. As we saw from his crazy letter to the government of Norway recently, where he said, “since you didn’t give me the Nobel Peace Prize, I’m going to wage war on the entire world in revenge.” And he doesn’t even understand that now even his supporters see that he is insane. The man has always been an extreme psychopathic narcissist who found his niche in organized crime, money laundering—that’s all he ever did—controlled by the Kosher Nostra.And now he’s been promoted way beyond his level of competence. His senility is reaching the point that he cannot even pretend to hide his extreme sociopathic narcissism anymore. And everybody now can see it. It’s on full display for the entire world. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News linkThe people of Iran have spoken. Massive, gargantuan, humongous protests, “the biggest and most beautiful protests the world has ever seen” as Trump would say, have brought countless millions of Iranians into the streets to send the theocrats (and parliamentary representatives) who govern them a message: “We love you! We love the Islamic Republic! We despise the Operation Gladio terrorists Israel and the US keep sending to murder our police officers and vandalize our property.”The patriotic pro-Iran protests were orders of magnitude larger than the comparatively minuscule “please fix the economy” protests infiltrated by the CIA’s Gladio killers and US-taxpayer-financed vandals. The largest “anti-government” protest (which was actually not anti-government at all, just pro-Iranian-economy) brought perhaps 10,000 people AT MOST into streets in downtown Tehran on January 8. Western propaganda media grossly inflated that already-generous number, falsely reported that most protesters were anti-Islamic-Republic rather than pro-economy, and hallucinated various ridiculous numbers of poor, innocent, peaceful demonstrators being killed by police. In reality, CIA-Mossad paid killers were hunting and killing police officers, while rooftop Gladio snipers were shooting at both police and protesters, as during the Maidan Square coup of 2014 and so many similar operations. By the time it was over, more than 100 Iranian police had been murdered, and Western-paid vandals had caused millions of dollars worth of damage, without advancing their regime change agenda one iota.Western Mockingbird media’s ludicrous lies were exposed on January 12, when many millions of Iranians turned out in all of the major cities to mourn the dead police officers and support their government’s response to the US-Israeli terror attacks. Aerial footage of the pro-government demonstrations shows their stunning magnitude. Watch some of it above on False Flag Weekly News.Why did the usually-skeptical Richie Allen get all of this so grotesquely wrong when I debated him almost two weeks ago? Richie knows mainstream Western media echo big lies scripted by their military and intelligence services. But the lies about Iran are so breathtakingly audacious, so over-the-top in their brazen audacity, and so cleverly designed to bypass the defenses of Western liberals and pwogwessives, that they sometimes convince people who are less affected by lesser lies about other issues.I learned firsthand how Western media were lying about protests in Iran when I visited Tehran during the first week of February 2023, in the immediate aftermath of months of Western-orchestrated anti-hijab protests following the death of Mahsa Amini. As with the pro-economy protests of early 2026, the protests themselves were not entirely organic. Mahsa Amini was visibly in perfect health during her court appearance for a traffic-ticket-level hijab infraction, then suddenly collapsed in the courtroom and died for reasons presumably related to her well-documented prior heart condition (though I wouldn’t put it past Israeli intelligence to have covertly killed her as part of a scripted PR stunt designed to trigger the protests). The billions of US taxpayer dollars spent to destabilize Iran then came into play, targeting the small secular pro-Western segment of the Iranian population with “THEY KILLED MAHSA” propaganda. And a relative handful of these secularist types did indeed protest. Those relatively small protests were then used as cover for the usual Operation Gladio killers and vandals to wreak their usual Maidan Square style havoc.-Note: The Iranian government loosened its hijab policy in 2022-2023, and rich secular women in North Tehran who used to prefer “bad hijab” (a tiny bit of cloth not covering more than a couple of hairs) now feel free to go “no-hijab.” In more conservative areas, where the vast majority supports universal hijab, women can still get the equivalent of a traffic ticket by violating the local dress code. (Note: Anthropologists know that what people cover up and what they let hang out varies widely according to culture. So if you think it’s okay for your group to make people cover their genitalia in public, why not allow other groups to decide what their people should cover up and what they can let hang out?! People who want to impose their culture’s dress code on other cultures, rather than allowing each culture to set its own dress code, are arrogant morons. Since Iranians are not arrogant morons, they are not trying to impose Iranian-style hijab on American feminists. Maybe the feminists should extend the same courtesy to Iran.)-I talked to witnesses who had viewed and/or attended the Mahsa pro-Western-feminism protests, including the biggest one in Tehran. They described the size of the crowd, showing the area it occupied in a couple of blocks of downtown Tehran. I forget whether that protest, the very biggest

Rumble link Bitchute link Truth Jihad Radio linkIn a recent “food fight” with Dr. Drew, Peter McCullough MD argued that RFK Jr.’s DHHS didn’t fix the old food guidance pyramid by turning it upside down. In this interview Dr. McCullough elaborates…and suggests that Trump’s authoritarian obscurantism may be affecting even the smarter people in his cabinet.Dr. McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist, and media commentator. He is Chief Scientific Officer of The Wellness Company and President of The McCullough Foundation.Excerpt:Dr. Peter McCullough, you just did a debate with Dr. Drew. He likes the new pyramid. And you’re not so sure. And frankly, I think based on what I understand, and I’m no expert, you got the better of him. And that’s partly because you’re willing to listen to the established research and not just flip it upside down, but figure out what’s right about it and what’s wrong about it.So let’s talk about the pyramid. What was wrong with the old one and what’s wrong with the new one?Well, first, let’s just talk about leadership methods. So I’ve been in leadership roles my entire life. I’m Chief Scientific Officer of the Wellness Company. I’m President McCullough Foundation. I was previously the Chief Scientific and Academic Officer for the St. John Providence Health System, the largest unit in Ascension Health. So let’s just talk about leadership for a minute. What should our leaders in Washington be doing? They should be identifying issues, calling in experts from all over, getting different viewpoints, arriving at a consensus, and then driving policy.] This is what RFK should be doing. We’re not seeing this. This is what people in the other positions in the cabinet should be doing. We’re not seeing this. And we should see natural disagreement among cabinet members, people in the administration. We’re not seeing this either. This is very disturbing.Do you know 100% of Trump’s cabinet members agree with Trump 100% of the time?I certainly would think so, yeah.But isn’t that disturbing? Do you know 100% of Vladimir Putin’s close advisors and 100% of the Politburo agree with Vladimir Putin? No, seriously, this is a real problem.I can’t believe Tulsi Gabbard agrees with invading Venezuela and planning a huge war on Iran.Well, here’s the thing. If we don’t get different viewpoints, and we don’t vet them, we can get off course. And so the best read on this is team of rivals. Lincoln, he was a real leader. What did he do? He invited all his rivals who had different viewpoints into his cabinet. We’ve seen just the opposite with Trump.And now each cabinet member is taking on the same method. So RFK takes on the food pyramid, but doesn’t get any input from the groups that have been opining on this for years and years and years, the American Heart Association, the American Dietetics Association, There are groups out there that are completely dedicated to advancing this. There have been huge dietary trials, massive clinical trials. But without calling in the experts, getting their opinions, and kind of doing it on your own, we ended up with this inverted food pyramid, which just from its presentation, is presenting things that can’t go together.For instance, the text indicates that the calories derived from saturated fat should be less than 10% of calories. Well, okay, that’s what the American Heart Association says too. Well, how many grams of saturated fat would that be then? The AHA does the math for you. I’ve done it as well. I try to keep my saturated fat below 10 grams per day. AHA says 13 grams a day. Well, you see that big fat steak on the RFK inverted pyramid or that big whopping turkey up there? We’re talking 20-plus grams of saturated fat.You can’t eat (lots of) steak. You can’t even eat a steak in the RFK presentation. The steak should be way down there. A bite or two, very seldom. I don’t think anybody’s against that. So the whole presentation is something that doesn’t even follow the text. You can tell it wasn’t peer reviewed. It wasn’t carefully thought out.And so this presentation claims that fats derived from red meat and dairy are healthy fats. That’s a deception. Those are unhealthy fats. Remember, the animal fats are saturated fat. They are not essential. Human bodies do not need them. They’re directly responsible for the liver producing cholesterol and cholesterol directly blocking arteries in the body. And you know what the counterclaim is? “All of that prior research has been invalidated by recent studies.” Well, there are no large recent well-done studies. There’s some sloppy nutritional epidemiology that has declared, “we can’t really find the signal between saturated fat and heart disease.” That’s making what’s called a type 2 error: failing to find the safety signal is not the same as saying it’s healthy. That’s a deception.(Read the whole transcript at my Substack by clicking “transcript” above the video image.)\Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanke

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News linkWatch the fiery argument between me and Dr. J. Michael Springmann, concerning the role of ICE and the murder of René Good, beginning at the 24:30 mark.Who’s behind the recent wave of attacks and threats on and by the United States?The US kidnapping of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro wasn’t just an attack on Venezuela. It was also an attack on America. The United States of America is not a “deep” organic nation featuring people who have lived there for many centuries under gradually-evolving cultural traditions, including language and religion. It emerged only 250 years ago as an idea, and that idea is enshrined in the Constitution, whose main function is to prevent autocratic, tyrannical rule. To that end, the president cannot make law, only execute it. He cannot declare war, only command it.The Trump regime is not just attacking the Constitution. It is an ongoing attack on the Constitution.Last week Trump’s ongoing unconstitutional attacks on American cities led to the murder of Renée Nicole Good, a mother of three young children, in Minneapolis. Trump’s goons, mostly overweight unemployable louts with beer bellies and atrophied brains who signed on for the lavish bonuses, have been routinely violating the 4th Amendment by stopping, interrogating and harassing people without probable cause to believe they have committed a crime. Now they are flipping out and shooting moms who disrespect them.Does Trump have the right to send National Guard troops under his command into cities that voted against him, in order to punish his political enemies? Of course not. Cursory research reveals what the “arguments” on both sides of this “controversy” actually are:The constitutional authority to deploy the National Guard is actually assigned to Congress, not the president. Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution gives Congress the power to “provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions”. Militias have been interpreted to include the National Guard.However, the Constitution also charges the president with two very significant duties. The first is to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States”; the second is to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed”. These two duties can amount to a significant grant of power in times of crisis.So if there were an insurrection or invasion, Congress could deploy the National Guard. The president’s only role would be to “defend the Constitution” (including Article 1, Section 8) by taking care that the laws passed by Congress, such as deploying the National Guard if necessary, be faithfully executed.But there obviously is no insurrection or invasion. Those calling excessive and/or illegal immigration an “invasion” are, of course, morons. If the immigrants were using military force to overwhelm the native police and military and seize political power at gunpoint, that would be an invasion…like Trump’s invasion of Venezuela. But that is very far from the case. No matter how much you dislike illegal immigration, lying about it only undermines your credibility. When the Founding Fathers used the word “invasion” they obviously meant (British) military attacks, like when Washington was burned down in 1812, not civilians landing in boats or walking across the southern or northern borders without telling the authorities.And just as there is no invasion, there is no insurrection, as defined by Google or whomever:An insurrection is a violent uprising or organized rebellion against a government or established authority, aiming to overturn it or resist its laws, often involving coordinated groups seeking political power.If insurrections were happening in Chicago, Portland, Los Angeles, Washington, Memphis, New Orleans, or Minneapolis, there would be massive gunfire, military aircraft galore, casualties in the thousands, and so on. Nothing remotely like that is going on. These cities are pretty much the same as they’ve always been, when everyone agreed that no insurrections were happening and anyone who said they were would have been deemed insane.Note: The January 6th 2000 protests at the capitol were obviously not an insurrection either.Since there is no insurrection or invasion, Congress has no right to send the National Guard into American cities. If it tried, those who voted to do it would be traitors to the Constitution and ought to be tried for treason.But even if Congress could make the case that an insurrection or invasion had occurred, which is very far from the case today, any president who tried to send the National Guard into American cities himself, rather than letting Congress (or state governors) decide whether to do it, would be a traitor to the Constitution, and ought to be immediately impeached, convicted, expelled from office, tried for treason, and, if convicted, hanged by the neck until dead. Indeed, anyone given that unco

Rumble link Bitchute linkFor more on Trump’s lifelong Kosher Nostra links, see “It’s In the Blood: The Trump Family’s Multiple Generations of Fealty to Jewish Power” by José Alberto Nino.Transcript:Kevin Barrett is joining us from Saadia, Morocco. Mr. Barrett, it’s great having you with us. First of all, we’ve seen many crackdowns by ICE recently, especially since when Donald Trump took office. But this is a major escalation. A mother of three was shot in broad daylight and killed. How do you see these protests differ from past ones? And do you think this will bring about a change?This could be the spark that lights the flames of an uprising against this completely brutal, unconstitutional, treasonous, Israeli-owned Trump regime. There are basically three key points I would make here. One is that the absolute and complete destruction of all forms of law and civilized behavior by Donald Trump and his insane minions—and they’re as insane as he is by basically humoring him and going along with him—the purpose of all this is that Trump was inserted in office by the most criminal faction of Kosher Nostra Zionist billionaires. The reason that they want Trump to pursue this agenda of trashing international law by kidnapping presidents, pushing things to the brink of World War III against Russia, stealing people’s ships, threatening to invade Greenland and Canada, supporting genocide in Palestine, all of this—is because the Jewish-Zionist supremacist billionaires who own the United States ever since they murdered the Kennedys and blew up the World Trade Center don’t believe that they will continue to rule in a world that has law. A lawful world is a world that will stop the genocide of Palestine.So they put Trump in office specifically to put an end to all forms of law, domestic and international, and create a gangster culture, a law of the jungle culture, where might is right, and masked agents can just snatch people off the streets for no reason and disappear them with no due process, no constitutional rights whatsoever.People who write editorials in favor of Palestine in college newspapers get snatched off the streets by masked goons. And now they’re shooting people down. So my first point is that it is the Zionist billionaires who are behind Trump’s agenda of destroying rule of law.And then secondly, it’s really important to note that we have to look at this kind of incident case by case to see what really happened. For instance, the earlier controversy in Minneapolis-St. Paul over George Floyd was actually distorted by the left-wing people. And an injustice was done to the police officer who was actually following department procedure, tragically and perhaps unwisely. But that particular George Floyd incident was not a case of egregious, extreme abuse by law enforcement.But this case is a case of murder by this ICE agent. They just shot this woman down for no reason whatsoever, except that she didn’t do what they told her to do. And Trump lied insanely, claiming that the poor ICE agent was in the hospital. And as the Minneapolis mayor said, it’s b******t. He was absolutely right in his obscene words to ICE. And I hope he does call up the National Guard in Minnesota and use force to expel ICE.And it’s really time, I think, for everyone in the United States who doesn’t want to live under this madman Trump dictatorship to rise up. Push any pro-Trump loyalist forces out of your neighborhood, out of your city, out of your state, out of your region. This has gone far enough.And so I think these are the first two key points here. And this could be the beginning of the end of the Trump administration. He may not serve out his term…On that note, Mr. Barrett, I was watching an American neighbor of Renee Nicole Good who urged her community members and fellow citizens to disregard the rights and the left and to unite against what ICE is doing. Do you think this will indeed unite the two sides or might we see the opposite happening, greater division within the United States?Well, I think we will see greater division between two camps. One camp is both left and right: intelligent people who are following what’s really going on. And there are roughly equal numbers of them actually on the left and the right.The other side is the fools. And right now, the fools are the people mostly on the right who still are making excuses for the mad would-be Emperor Caligula Trump, or Trumpigula, I guess some people are calling him now. The people on the right are realizing that they got sold a bill of goods by these Zionist billionaires who inserted Trump in office. They realized that they voted for America first. They voted for an end to foreign adventures and wars, and an end to foreign countries having too much influence over the United States.But what do we have? An Israeli-captured American criminal regime waging all-out war on the world. And now Trump is trying to raise the military budget 50%—the biggest raise in all of American his

Rumble link Bitchute linkChildrenOfJob SubstackJasun Horsley writes: “This is easily the most comprehensive and coherent (& balanced) summation of the JQ I have come upon. If anyone knows a better one, please point me to it.”Deep dive into organized Judaism, the Hebrew Bible, Zionism, and long-term religio-social engineering with Kevin Barrett of Truth Jihad. Full audio 2 hr 48 mins.Part One: The Ideology of IdentityThe difference between Jews, Judaites, & Zionists, separating the wheat from the tares of the Old Testament, Shlomo Sand, Laurent Guyenot, 8th day circumcision as trauma-based mind control, Zombie Judaism, the tribal Jewish takeover of media, banking, & organized crime, Genesis vs. the rest of the OT, isolating the ideological content, the Book of Job, God’s law vs. human law, Girard & scapegoating in the OT, Peter Thiel’s Straussian lies, 911 scapegoating ritual.Part Two: Tribal Nepotist MafiaThe danger of scapegoating Zionist Jews, the greatest scapegoat of the 20th century, being liminal, Kevin’s truth jihad policy, balancing evidence & opinion, understanding “Jewish conspiracy,” the alliance of Jewish administrative elite with local power, merchant class politics & selective breeding, how Yahwist tribal politics attained social dominance, Jewish IQ, taking over the US, Meyer Lansky and the great banking swindle, Christian Zionism, the Scofield Bible, Jewish eschatology, installing the Jewish Messiah, Muslims on Jesus, Jasun in Morocco, Zombie Islam.Part Three: Jewish Organized Crime KingThe 2016 US election, installing DJ Trump, Roy Cohn, Meyer Lansky, and the NY mafia, competing factions, J. Edgar Hoover & compromat, Roy Cohn’s toyboy, Robert I. Friedman, the devil’s offer, the JCPOA, a fixation on Jerusalem, Maimonides & what Jews (can) do to bring on the Messiah, a spectrum from Judaism to Satanism via atheistic Zionism, accelerationism, a smorgasbord of agendas, a void of religious or historical justification, who still supports Israel besides power elite? Celts conquering Wales, Native Americans & the US, rational Zionism as oxymoron, fleeing Israelis, how a sociopathic superstate is created.For a full transcript, click “transcript” above the video image at my Substack. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkGerman chemist and historical scholar Germar Rudolf is helping organize and host the first Holocaust skeptics’ conference in more than two decades. The ARMREG Holocaust Academy Summit is scheduled for Tuesday, January 27. Learn more at the HolocaustSummit.com.(Watch and listen to my earlier interviews with Germar Rudolf.)Excerpt:Germar Rudolf: It’s the first time I’m doing this. Now, conferences for and by Holocaust skeptics have been organized here in the United States beginning the early 1980s and 1990s…I think the first was in organized in 1979 by the Institute for Historical Review. And then they did them yearly or biannually into the early 2000s. And then the whole thing kind of went dormant. And there were a few conferences by a competing organization, a split off, so to speak. The Barnes Review had a few in the late 90s and early 2000s. But that has come to complete dormancy by now, too. There is no event where we can all gather and talk, and realize we are a community. We are a small ecosystem of a lot of people who are interested, who support this and who want to see it thrive. And I’ve actually been asked since the early 2000s —I think the last conference the IHR, the Institute for Historical Review, did was in 2002 if I’m not mistaken—and then nothing happened. And I was asked whether I could organize it. Back then, I was logistically not in the position to be able to pull that off. But the question came up again the second time around I came into this country after my extended hiatus, my extended leave of absence...You were a guest of the German state for a while, weren’t you?Yeah, I was allowed to breathe sieved air, as they say, for 44 months because of what you just mentioned, countries. 27 Western countries, liberal democracies, have decided democracy is when two wolves and a lamb decide what’s for dinner. And I happen to have been a lamb. So it didn’t go down well for my liberty…Congratulations on coming at the powers that be with ideas that are so powerful that they have to lock you up for 44 months. That’s pretty serious, especially in these Western countries that normally try not to do things like that.Plus, in the wake of my activity as a forensic expert showing up at trials, the general authorities were so desperate to put a stop to it that they changed case law based on my appearances and my activities, primarily other activities too. One lawyer wanted to introduce me to testify as a forensic expert on the question of whether or not the Auschwitz gas chambers could have worked and if there’s any trace, chemically speaking, that supports either the theory of its existence or non-existence. And the reaction of that was that the lawyer, just for having filed the motion to hear me, was prosecuted, sentenced. And that was, I think, a prison term on probation and a fine. And ever since, trying to defend yourself in these cases of historical dissent is illegal.So they are so desperate, they don’t even want you to present your evidence in court when you’re being dragged in court. And that suggests maybe they’re afraid of that evidence. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkThe genocidal Zionist oligarchy that runs the West is running into HEROIC resistance from the brave anti-genocide forces in Iran and Venezuela. Mainstream media aren’t telling you about the huge pro-government protests in Iran that dwarf the anti-government ones, nor about the huge crowds in Venezuelan cities demanding that gangster Trump release their kidnapped president. Kevin Barrett schools Richie Allen! Transcript:Richie Allen: Listen, Kevin Barrett needs no introduction to this audience. Kevin has been gracing this programme for many, many, many years. He is an academic, a broadcaster, researcher. He’s got his own Substack account, kevinbarrett.substack.com. You’ll find him on unz.com. You’ll find him everywhere. Let’s welcome him back to the programme and wish him a happy New Year to boot. Kevin, welcome back. How are you?Kevin Barrett: Hey, thank you, Richie. Great to be back with you. Happy New Year to you too.Fantastic, Kevin. Thank you. I’m going to play some audio for you. It’s Good Morning Ireland. It’s an RTE. It’s an Irish national radio programme. And they were discussing the protests in Iran this morning. We will, of course, speak Venezuela. But I wanted to play this for you. And on the programme, they spoke with a woman called Tara Kangarlou. Interesting character, Tara Kangarlou. She is a professor at Georgetown University and she’s written a book on Iran. She was invited onto Irish National Radio, Kevin, to discuss the organisation of these protests, which I’m fascinated by. So let’s have a listen to what she said.Tara Kangarlou: Who organised the protests in Iran? The protests, as you mentioned, are moving into the th day across Iran. And they’re ordinary people, young and old, boys and girls, women and men, who for the past few years have come out on the streets in the protests that we’ve seen over the years in in the aftermath of Mahsa Amini’s death in the custody of the morality police and prior to that in and which, by the way, were prompted by Iran’s poor economy. These are the same people, ordinary Iranians, who are suffering every day from poor living conditions, dire economic conditions. And quite frankly, I would call it an economic crisis. This is a country of million people with great potential, an extremely resourceful country where the people are not benefiting from these resources. And their money is being looted, quite frankly, by a very narrow group within the regime. So they’re unhappy. And once again, they’re taking it to the street and they’re being brutally stifled by the regime forces.Kevin, the Telegraph newspaper is reporting today that the Iranian government has promised to pay five pounds, that’s five British pounds, a month to any citizen who agrees not to attend protests. They will receive this in the form of a voucher. You have travelled in the country, you’re very interested in the country. Talk to us about this economic situation as described by the American academic. How bad is it in Iran?Well, last time I was there was a couple of years ago. I was going every year from February 2013 up through 2019, when Sigil Mandelkar, who’s an Israeli citizen who Trump appointed as the head of the U.S. Treasury Department sanctions program, sicced the FBI on the various university professors and public intellectuals who, like me, were going to conferences in Iran. And the FBI told us that if we accepted any more invitations from the New Horizon NGO, founded by Nader Talebzadeh, Iran’s biggest talk show host and a big filmmaker there, we would be arrested when we returned from the conference.So I went many times over those years, and I was shocked at how favorably the economic situation in Iran compares with countries like Morocco, Turkey, Mexico, Guatemala, and various other countries I’ve visited. It’s a booming country. There was constant construction going on. The problem is,. everybody has a car, unlike most third world countries, so that creates the problem of too much traffic. So this notion that there’s some uh massive, horrific economic situation there is, I think, a gross exaggeration, because I heard the same kinds of things when I was visiting and seeing the opposite with my own eyes. But…what we just heard from that evil witch that you recorded is satanic lies She’s working for the genocide perpetrators. She’s working for Team Genocide. She’s working for the people who don’t like the government of Iran because it’s run by people who actually have morals and ethics and who are standing strong against the genocide of Palestine. That’s the only reason it’s targeted for overthrow.These protests are infiltrated by Operation Gladio terrorists who have been murdering Iranian police officers who have been extremely lenient and very, very careful to try to separate the CIA and Israeli paid teams of trained killers who are in these protests from the genuine protestors.Let’s forget about Israel for a minute. Let’s forget about Israel for a mom

Rumble link Bitchute link FFWN linkI spend a lot of time writing and talking about how bad things are, and rarely offer solutions of the “here’s what you can do” variety. During the decade when I was doing a lot of in-person lectures (2006-2016) I noticed that audiences always asked the same question: “What can I do about this?” (This being the 9/11 false flag.) My answers, which leaned heavily into info-activism, were only marginally satisfactory.Today, the outrages “up with which we must not put” are coming at us hotter and heavier than ever. No sane human being wants to put up with:*The US-taxpayer-funded Gaza genocide, featuring the deliberate murder of perhaps 680,000 people including 380,000 children under five years old according to UN Rapporteur Francesca Albanese. *Lying Epstein-crony and accused child-rapist and child-murderer Trump’s grotesquely mendacious thuggery against Venezuela, his “Christmas bombing three countries for Israel,” among other guided-by-Israel policies including genocide complicity and threats against Iran.*And the underlying problem: Runaway technology in the hands of genocidal Zionist billionaires determined to turn Earth into a prison planet…a planet not worth living on, where the only human option would be to sacrifice one’s life in glorious revolt.Inaction would be inhuman. No human being could accept these outrages, do nothing, and live with themselves. So…what kind of actions? Key criteria: They should be ethically defensible, potentially effective…and, if possible, life-enhancing and enjoyable.E Michael Jones, Ron Unz: Two Viable ProjectsFalse Flag Weekly News co-host E. Michael Jones is pushing a Catholic-Muslim alliance. Dr. Jones identifies the enemy as Jewish tribalism in general and its extremist messianic-millenarian Zionist manifestation in particular. Catholicism and Islam have the prerequisites to solve the problem.The world’s nearly 1.5 billion Catholics and 2 billion Muslims represent a little less than half of the global population. Throw in sympathetic non-Catholic Christians, starting with the Eastern Orthodox, and you’ve got a global majority. That majority represents universal ethical monotheism—the reformed, corrected, viable alternative to the Bronze Age unethical tribalist henotheism of the Jews. And the Catholic-Muslim alliance agrees that usury is perhaps the worst of crimes, meaning that the Jewish-Zionist bankers who run the West are the worst of criminals. Their other crimes—propaganda lies, deviance and degeneracy, murder and genocide in service to property theft, and so on—are related to usury, as Ezra Pound so eloquently noticed. Simply by enforcing the first of sacred rules—a universal ban on usury—the Catholic-Muslim Alliance would solve Earth’s biggest pressing problem.Okay, so maybe you’re neither Muslim nor Catholic/Christian, and for whatever reason not interested in converting. In that case, another good info-activism strategy was articulated back in 2016 by Ron Unz. In his article “American Pravda: Breaching the Media Barrier” Unz persuasively argues that since “the media is the crucial force empowering the opposition, then it should be regarded as a primary target of any political strategy.” In other words, we should be working overtime to erode the mainstream media’s credibility. Our primary targets must be the ever-shrinking portion of the population, especially those with significant wealth/education/power, who have not yet awakened to the reality that mainstream media peddles propaganda lies. Only secondarily should we be preaching to the converted, with the aim of convincing them to act more effectively against the media, reinforcing their stamina and enthusiasm, or stopping them from drifting back into the media propaganda orbit.Anti-MSM info-activism has prospered on social media. But now that the Zionist billionaires are buying up social media and cracking down on algorithms, we may be facing diminishing returns. Maybe it’s time to get out into public spaces, like Charlie Kirk famously did, and start conversations aimed at red-pilling people. (I know Charlie wasn’t very red-pilled, but if he can start conversations in public, so can we.) T-shirts bearing messages about red-pill subjects can be good conversation starters. I often wear the “9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB” T-shirt Alex Jones gave me while traveling, even though we all know that 9/11 was an Israeli job. That shirt has started many dozens of conversations, including several with pilots and TSA personnel. Thank you, Alex!It’s important to remember that not just any anti-MSM message actually works against the MSM. The anti-MSM message needs to appear to not-yet-converted (non-red-pilled) people as reasonably credible. A crazy person ranting about 9/11, however accurately, or a crank pushing ridiculous-sounding ideas like flat Earth or viruses don’t exist or nuclear weapons don’t exist, may actually reinforce the authority of mainstream media by fostering the impression amon

Rumble link Bitchute linkUpdate: I awoke this morning, Saturday, to the news that the US has bombed Caracas and other Venezuelan cities. E. Michael Jones and I will discuss this and other news on today’s False Flag Weekly News—watch at or after 8 pm Quds Time (1 pm Eastern).Kevin Barrett tells Press TV that Trump’s childish bullying can’t conceal the fact that the US empire is on the way out. Nor will it get the US a better deal from Venezuela than what sober diplomacy could have produced. (For more on this topic see my interview “Will Venezuela Defeat US in World War III?”)Transcript:I’d like to thank you very much, Kevin Barrett, for joining us today during this hour’s top headline. Mr. Barrett, let’s go ahead and start off with a situation. In your opinion, how close is a full-scale war on Venezuela? Or do you believe it’s just more threats by the U.S.?I think there’s probably less than a 50% chance of a full-scale war. But, of course, that’s not really a very accurate forecast. That’s like saying it’s 50-50 whether it’ll be sunny or whether it will rain. But I think that there is a real chance of war. What we are seeing is essentially a demonstration of weakness by the Trump administration and the U.S. in the form of over-the-top outrageous bullying based on these insane lies about supposed fentanyl coming from Venezuela, which everyone admits it doesn’t. And then recently we had Trump admitting that he really wanted the oil, which was a half-truth, because probably the single biggest factor driving this hostility to Venezuela is the Venezuelan government’s support for the Palestinians against the Israeli genocide.So Trump’s bullying is a sign of weakness. Bullies are well known to behave the way they do because deep inside they feel weak. So they have to try to project a false image of strength by picking on someone smaller than they are. And that’s what the United States is doing now. It’s lost to Russia in Ukraine. It’s not in a position to genuinely challenge China in the South China Sea or anywhere else. So it’s picking on Venezuela as an easy target to demonstrate its bullying propensities.Trump is a quintessential bully. He’s a narcissistic sociopath who’s been bullying people throughout his entire career as a stooge of the Kosher Nostra criminal organization that runs the United States. And so it’s not surprising that he and the United States have resorted to this obscene, disgusting bullying based on lies. And whether that means that they’re actually going to attack Venezuela in an all-out war remains to be seen.We have over 115 people killed by the U.S. under this pretext, as you mentioned. And yet President Maduro is still open to negotiations, saying the ball is in the U.S.’s court. Do you see any negotiation attempt by Trump?I don’t think that we should rule that out. Trump’s personality is very mercurial. He’s been known to use threats and crazy behavior to try to soften up people that he’s going to negotiate with. In the past, we’ve seen that lead to North Korea becoming essentially a legitimized nuclear weapons state. Trump yelled and screamed and pressured Kim Jong Un and then gave in.And so it’s possible that an oil deal and a drug fighting deal will come out of this, and Trump will declare a win and imagine that his bullying has succeeded—when, in fact, I’m sure that the United States could have gotten the same deal without all the murder, bullying, and besmirching America’s reputation and squandering its soft power with this insane behavior.Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Alternately you can Paypal or Zelle to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link“Israel” has been genocidal from the very beginning. By the 1990s, the Israeli New Historians, and courageous voices like Israel Shahak, had exposed the terrible truth. But Zionist-dominated Western media covered it up, and instead of trying to atone, Israel only got more genocidal. In this interview, Salim Mansur discusses that unfortunate history, by way of his new article: “Thou Hypocrite, First Cast Out the Beam Out of Thine Own Eye”: Recalling Israel Shahak.Salim Mansur is a professor emeritus of political science at the University of Western Ontario in Canada. He is a former columnist for the London Free Press and the Toronto Sun, and has contributed to various publications including National Review, the Middle East Forum and Frontpagemag. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute linkLast week German journalist Anna Liedtke spoke publicly for the first time about being raped by Israeli soldiers after being kidnapped in international waters in September. If Iran or Venezuela or Russia had kidnapped activists, viciously abused them, and even raped one or more of them, it would have been front page mainstream media headlines for weeks…especially if one of the victims was one of the world’s biggest celebrities. And if Germany had kidnapped a ship full of Jewish activists…well, let’s not even go there. So let’s Google “Israel raped German journalist” to find some of that heavy media coverage.When mainstream media cover a news story, the link inevitably shows up at the top of Google search results. So the absence of evidence of MSM coverage of Anna Liedke’s story is definitely evidence of absence. (Adding “New York Times” and “Washington Post” to the Google inquiry doesn’t help.)It’s almost as if the media don’t want us to know that Israel is a nation of rapists and rapist-enablers. Israel prison guards train dogs to rape prisoners. They rape prisoners to death with sticks. Their soldiers take selfies dressing in the underwear of the women and girls they have murdered and/or raped. And most of the Americans who pay for it all have no idea.The Israeli public loves it. If foreign pressure forces Israeli prosecutors to even look into such a case, a one-in-a-million occurrence, Israelis respond by turning out in huge throngs to support the killer-rapists and make them national heroes. Israel is probably the only country in history with a “right to rape” movement that turns psychopaths who sodomize people to death with sticks into celebrity victims.Think about it: A prison guard who sodomized a prisoner to death with a stick appears on Israeli national television and plays the victim. And the Israeli Jewish public laps it up, rallying behind the killer-rapist and agreeing that he, not the person he sodomized to death, is the real victim. What does that say about the culture and psychology of these people? To me it says: If you see a Jew coming after you with a stick, run! You know he’s going to cry out…but what he’s going to do to you while he’s wailing and playing the victim and profiting mightily from his “victimization” might be a whole lot worse than just striking you.It’s odd that the #MeToo movement, which occasionally seems to go overboard persecuting American guys who might have looked crosswise at a woman decades ago, doesn’t notice Israeli rape culture. Here is a whole nation where the majority of men agree it’s fine to rape an acquaintance, and #MeToo doesn’t blink an eye. Once again, blame the mainstream media blackout. (For a balanced and sympathetic view of why the Jewish-dominated American mainstream media systematically covers up Israel’s criminal nature, check out Philip Weiss’s classic “Do Jews Dominate in American Media? And So What If We Do?”)“The Jew cries out as he strikes you” may be the world’s most underrated and understated proverb. It would be easy to fill a one-hour weekly news broadcast with stories illustrating it. In fact, quite a few of the past week’s most important news stories have a “cries out as he strikes you angle.” Let’s look at a few.Donald Trump: Taught to “Cry Out” by the Master, Roy CohnFirst and foremost, US President Donald Trump—who may or may not be Jewish, but who learned the “cry out as you strike ‘em (and rape ‘em)” schtick from his Kosher Nostra mentor Roy Cohn—spent Christmas wailing and weeping crocodile tears about being accused of child-rape and murder of babies and teenagers. It’s those mean, nasty Democrats who are persecuting the poor, spotless, totally-Epstein-innocent Trump! If you haven’t figured out that Trump is a bordlerline-psychotic, sociopathic mega-narcissist by now, his bizarre tweeting and bombing over Christmas—that “most wonderful time of year” when, many years ago, he allegedly witnessed a baby being murdered and thrown into Lake Michigan, according to Justice Department files—should nudge you toward belated recognition of the hideous truth. To call Trump’s reaction to the escalating Epstein scandals textbook guilty demeanor would be putting it mildly.I had to issue a “not satire” warning when I wrote the headline Trump Wishes “Sleazebags” a Merry Epstein Christmas:“Merry Christmas to all, including the many Sleazebags who loved Jeffrey Epstein, gave him bundles of money, went to his Island, attended his parties, and thought he was the greatest guy on earth, only to ‘drop him like a dog’ when things got too HOT, falsely claimed they had nothing to do with him, didn’t know him, said he was a disgusting person, and then blame, of course, President Donald J. Trump, who was actually the only one who did drop Epstein, and long before it became fashionable to do so…Seconds after Trump posted that, the internet started lighting up with images, videos, and Justice Department files documenting Trump partying

Today I received some sad news:Vladislav Georgievich Krasnov (AKA W. George Krasnow) passed away peacefully at the age of 88 on 23 November 2025 at the home of his daughter and son-in-law in Crockett, California…Vladislav graduated from Moscow State University in 1960 with a diploma in history and anthropology and worked with the Swedish Service at Radio Moscow prior to defecting to Sweden where he studied and lectured at the University of Lund (Sweden) several years prior to moving to the United States. With a Masters in Slavic languages and a PhD in Russian Literature from the University of Washington, he became known for his work on Soviet defectors, Russian literature and politics. He was a post-doctoral fellow at the University of Chicago, taught or conducted research at the University of Texas, Southern Methodist University, Hokkaido University (Japan), and Hoover Institution at Stanford University where his research materials are housed. He served as the director of the Russian Studies program at the Monterey Institute of International Studies, Monterey, California.He was passionately devoted to improving relations between the United States and his beloved Russia, to which end he established and led the Russia-America Goodwill Association. He studied and wrote prolifically, published numerous books and articles and lectured in a variety of venues. His books included: Solzhenitsyn and Dostoevsky, a Study in the Polyphonic Novel; Soviet Defectors, the KGB Wanted List; Russia Beyond Communism, a Chronicle of Rebirth; From the East to the West, a Message of Peace - Select Essays; Permian Cross: Mikhail Romanov; and, When I Was Born, The Genesis of Dissent (a memoir), the latter two in Russian only.He heartily embraced and promoted the philosophical ideal espoused by Alexander Solzhenitsyn as a viable pathway toward a revitalized Russia. He actively participated in efforts by fellow native Permians to highlight the legacy of Grand Duke Mikhail Aleksandrovich Romanov who, as the ‘last’ Tsar of Russia, surrendered power in favor of a constitutional monarchy. And, as a board member of the Gandhian Global Harmony Association, he actively supported their efforts promoting global peace.Vladislav was known and appreciated for his intellect, even temperament, friendliness and eagerness to promote goodwill. He travelled extensively in many countries, easily engaging people from all walks of life and ethnic backgrounds while spreading cheer and harmony along the way. He was thoughtful, considerate and kind to all. He cherished the company of the animals in his life, and they doted on his presence and affection. He enjoyed frolicking at the beach, taking a dip in the ocean, playing tennis, snow skiing, hiking and dancing to his own beat. —Vladislav Krasnov epitomized the way that people with uncommon common sense often wind up as dissidents. He didn’t get caught up in groupthink bubbles, whether the Russian Communist totalitarianism he was born into, or the post-Cold War and especially post-9/11 neocon “American” (covertly Zio-supremacist) triumphalism that has ruined the USA.Like me, Vladislav was a literature scholar heavily influenced by M.M. Bakhtin and his Doestoevsky-based theories of dialogism and polyphony. He liked my podcast because he saw it (correctly, I hope) as radically dialogic: I listen to guests and interact, without ponderously imposing my own views Alex Jones style. That can get you in trouble, as Tucker Carlson found out when he interviewed Nick Fuentes, but it’s a good kind of trouble to be in if you’re an openminded truth-seeker who doesn’t mind offending fools and knaves.Vladislav didn’t just dissent against silly orthodoxies and champion the heretics who poked holes in them. He focused on solutions. His Russia-America Goodwill Association (RAGA) was an exemplary attempt to foster cordiality between the great powers. Though a Russian nationalist at heart, his brand of nationalism did not exclude, scapegoat, or demonize the other. It was more about seeking and championing the best of Russian history, culture, and spirituality than about denigrating anyone else. Contemporary nationalists, including European and “white” nationalists, could learn from his example.—Vladislav “George” Krasnov: Is the USA Becoming Monologic and Totalitarian?November 2017Welcome to Truth Jihad Radio, and now Truth Jihad Video. I’m Kevin Barrett, doing all kinds of interesting interviews with some of the best guests you’ll find anywhere, talking about truths way outside of the mainstream box. Today, we’ve got a very special guest, Vladislav Krasnov of the Russian American Goodwill Association, or RAGA. He’s got a wonderful newsletter, and it features incisive and really fair and balanced commentary on these issues involving the rising tension with Russia. The American people can’t really figure out why we’re supposed to still be antagonistic towards Russia with the Cold War over. But somebody wants us to be. And for t

Rumble link Bitchute linkThe US was humiliated by its $8 trillion forever wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. What will happen if it loses in Venezuela? What if an American fleet, or much of it, gets sunk, revealing the limits of naval power in a world full of cheap anti-ship missiles?Transcript:Thank you very much, Mr. Barrett, for joining us during this hour’s top headlines. Let’s go ahead and start off with the U.S military buildup and everything that is happening in Venezuela. Caracas is preparing for a likely US invasion of Venezuela. With all of Trump’s threats and all the games that he’s been playing lately, do you think that there is a possibility of the invasion of Venezuela?Yes, I think there is a possibility. I think it would be a very ill-advised move by the Trump administration. It would essentially be a repeat of the very mistakes, the invasions of Afghanistan and especially Iraq, that Trump actually won office originally in 2016 by exposing and decrying. Trump was a critic of Bush Jr.‘s ridiculous claims that Iraq was full of weapons of mass destruction, but now Trump is doing the same thing. He just hilariously classified fentanyl, the drug, as a quote unquote weapon of mass destruction, so he can use the same excuse that Bush used to invade Iraq, which turned out to be a disaster, to invade Venezuela. And that would be at least an equally big disaster. Venezuela’s terrain is much more favorable to a guerrilla war than Iraq’s ever was. The mountains, the jungles, and then, of course, the anti-ship weapons that Venezuela may possess could deliver a terrible shock to the U.S. Navy.The people of the region, especially the more intelligent, educated people, know about the horrors of U.S. imperialism in the region, and they will unite behind Venezuela, not just the people inside Venezuela, but everywhere else as well. I think in the same way that the Trump administration and the Israelis were surprised that Iran rallied as a nation against the evil Israeli aggression last June. And that led to a lot more virtually unanimous support for the government in Iran. The same kind of thing would happen in Venezuela, but also outside the borders, the whole continent, and indeed all of Latin America. Even Mexico will be full of people wanting to defend Venezuela and Latin America in general from these rapacious, crazy Yankee imperialists who want to come in and steal their resources, which Trump has even admitted is his goal.Now he’s finally admitted that no, it’s not about fentanyl which of course doesn’t come from Venezuela anyway—that’s all just a ludicrous pretext—what it’s reallyabout is stealing what Trump says is “our” oil. Well, Trump, what is your oil doing under Venezuela’s land? Maybe Trump doesn’t realize…he looks at a globe and he sees that Texas is above Venezuela and he thinks the oil leaked out of Texas down into Venezuela, so he’s going to go get it back.This is so ludicrous. And so the international community needs to stand up and say, look, we have a multipolar world now. We need it to run under some vestige of international law. And instead of having the UN and international law working together with the Americans, which has been the way it’s been since World War II, it’s time that international law and international cooperation has to happen against the Zionist occupied U.S. empire.And Mr. Barrett, if you could briefly, please, in around a minute…you did mention a very important point that I’d like to go ahead and focus on. You said that there are people that support Venezuela that are willing to defend it, such as Mexico and other neighboring countries. But again, I want to ask about when it comes to Venezuela’s other allies around the world, such as Iran. Iran has stood by Venezuela for years now. You have Russia, you have other countries. Do you believe these countries will come in and defend and protect Venezuela in the case of an invasion by the U.S.?I don’t think that we’re going to see Iran firing rockets at US military bases. And I don’t think we’re going to see Russia launching its unstoppable rockets at United States targets. I think that the aid to Venezuela will be deniable. And I wouldn’t be surprised—again, I’ve been making this point but haven’t seen very many other people make it, but I think it’s an important point—that the missile technology today is such that the anti-ship missiles are very difficult to stop. That is, it’s much cheaper to build a missile that can pose a real threat to sink a ship than it is to defend against that missile. And so that means that relatively cheap, relatively powerful anti-ship missiles are out there. And one of the reasons the United States has never invaded Iran, and that is off the table, is because they know that Iran can sink their ships. Years ago, Iran had Chinese sunburn missiles or the Iranian equivalent that could threaten American ships and that technology has continued progressing.So I think that China, Russia, Iran and Cuba and N

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News linkWas Bondi Beach a false flag designed to shut down anti-genocide protests that have rocked Australia? Were the "redacted Epstein Files non-release" and Trump's obsequious "handling" by Miriam Adelson and Mark Levin humiliation rituals? These and other pointed questions about the week’s news, and its context, were raised in the latest False Flag Weekly News podcast with Helen Buyniski. I normally write an article to accompany each FFWN podcast, but Helen’s latest is so good I decided to just send it out instead. -KBSexual Blackmail Makes the World Go ‘RoundJeffrey Epstein may be dead, but the network that created him is still screwing us allHelenOfDestroy SubstackAmerican democracy has devolved into a humiliation ritual in which we are expected to pledge support for people who hate us so they can steal our property, molest our children, and punish us for talking about their crimes. In election after election we are pressured to declare allegiance to one morally bankrupt criminal, simply because the other morally bankrupt criminal in the race might be even worse, thus becoming complicit in the election of a morally bankrupt criminal. Casting that vote on an electronic voting machine that even the government’s own intelligence director has admitted is totally hackable only strengthens the power of the ritual. Americans feel dumber every time we feed our choices into the ballot scanner and pray not to be disenfranchised, as if our selections made a difference in a contest that has been limited to the “lesser of two evils” for years. Standing up for ourselves and refusing to participate in such demeaning pageantry is denigrated as un-American, and our sentimental attachment to the democratic ideal masks the understanding that no change is actually possible within a system designed to deprive us of agency, so we legitimize a corrupt system with our participation instead. Like the teenage victims of Jeffrey Epstein, who returned to his mansions again and again even as they felt the humiliating experience draining their life force because they’d become convinced they could expect nothing better out of life, we have grown so accustomed to having our faces rubbed in outrageous and self-evident lies that we are starting to think we deserve the abuse.Trump voters in particular have had a difficult year. Spooked back in July by a trickle of leaks suggesting he had been closer with Epstein than he claimed, the president raged at his supporters for demanding the release of the government’s remaining files on the case, despite repeated promises to release them during his 2024 reelection campaign. He sent FBI chief Kash Patel — who had also called for Epstein transparency before joining the Trump administration and acquiring his own Mossad handler (you gonna sue me, Kash?) — to inform the public that Epstein trafficked hundreds if not thousands of girls to absolutely nobody, despite copious documentation including an actual client list featuring at least 20 boldface names in FBI possession. The humiliation ritual was an encore performance for Patel, who had already appeared alongside his deputy Dan Bongino earlier in the year in an infamous clip where the pair, looking more uncomfortable than the stars of the average hostage video, reassured the public that Epstein had killed himself after all — case closed!Having publicly disavowed the support of anyone still concerned how an intelligence operative working for Israel and the US was able to fly planeloads of teenage girls around the world for sex and lend them out to a who’s who of the global elite, maintaining a trove of compromising video footage of the aforementioned, without authorities lifting a finger in protest or (supposedly) finding the resulting videos, Trump spent several months trying to block the release of the files. He only took time out from railing against what was now declared a “Democrat hoax” to relocate Epstein’s partner-in-crime Ghislaine Maxwell, currently serving a 20-year sentence, to a minimum-security facility, in violation of prison sex-offender protocols. He even teased a pardon for the alleged Mossad asset, whose victims remember her as even more abusive than Epstein himself. Trump targeted Kentucky Republican Thomas Massie — perhaps the most respected man in American politics — with his next social media tantrum, condemning him as a “loser” for co-authoring a bipartisan bill to release the files, then turned his rage on Marjorie Taylor Greene, excoriating the Georgia Republican who was once among his most loyal supporters as a “traitor” because she hosted a press conference with a group of Epstein survivors in support of Massie’s transparency bill. The president even announced he’d host his first fundraiser of the 2026 season to reelect notoriously closeted warmonger Lindsey Graham, South Carolina’s Israel-First senator. By the time Trump finally dropped his opposition to the file release —

Rumble link Bitchute linkPodcast guest K. Barrett Bilali has recently published articles on ChatGPT’s crisis and AI in (Moroccan) art and music.An American “MomOf4” drew a quarter-million views with her YouTube video “Why I Moved to Morocco.” Apparently, moving to Morocco is becoming a thing. The other Kevin Barrett, who moved to Morocco before I did, joined me on the Truth Jihad podcast to explain why, and to express his potential willingness to serve as a consultant for those considering such a move. (To contact him, subscribe to his Substack and reply to his welcoming email.)God is currently showering blessings on Morocco in the form of rain and snow, which the country badly needs after seven years of drought, and also in the form of soccer victories, most recently last night’s thrilling Arab Cup final against Jordan. Next week Morocco starts hosting the Africa Cup, in which its team is the top seed, using infrastructure developed in preparation for hosting the World Cup in 2030, when it will be rolling out the world’s biggest stadium, the Hassan II stadium in Casablanca. Since it overperformed in the last World Cup by reaching the semifinals, Morocco has become a soccer powerhouse, recently winning the U20 World Cup and putting in strong performances in various other categories.But infrastructure development in Morocco isn’t limited to stadiums. Transportation and communications are also getting big upgrades. The Buraq high-speed train linking Tangier and Casablanca ranks among the top ten of world’s fastest trains, with more high-speed rail under development, and Tangier Med is the biggest port in Africa. Having diplomatically won an international consensus that the Moroccan Sahara is indeed Moroccan, the government is also building the Dakhla Atlantic Port, a $1.2 billion deepwater project scheduled to open in two to three years. It will connect landlocked Sahel countries (Mali, Chad, Niger) to global markets and serve as a hub for renewable energy, fishing, and industry. Internet connectivity has exploded as well. If you need fast, reliable internet, Morocco is your best bet in Africa. Here in Eastern Morocco, which generally trails Western Morocco in infrastructure, people are excited about the Medusa fiber optic cable that will link Nador to Marseille, France. There is also quite a bit of buzz about a big AI project in Berkane, the closest real city to my Mediterranean vacation town of Saidia.Like the Chinese, Moroccans are blessed with the impression that their country is growing, developing, and generally moving in the right direction. That’s a marked contrast to the perception among Americans, especially the better- informed among them, that the USA’s glory days are behind it, and that Trump is not only failing to make America great again, but rivaling Caligula as a mad emperor overseeing societal collapse.Living in a developing, improving, optimistic country is one benefit of Moroccan residency. But there are more tangible ones as well. The cost of living is among the world’s lowest. The food is arguably the world’s best, as is the weather. The people are generally kind, welcoming, and helpful—sometimes a bit too helpful, truth be told. (If you don’t understand how being overly helpful can actually sometimes be unhelpful, you’ve never been to Morocco.)* And the culture and history are uncommonly rich: Greco-Roman civilization and its Arab-Islamic upgrade form an unbroken legacy stretching back thousands of years, and today’s political Morocco (al-Maghreb al-Aqsa) traces itself back the founding of the Idrisid dynasty in 788. You can get by speaking French almost anywhere, Spanish works in the north, and English is increasingly common among the younger, wealthier, and better-educated segments of the population. If, like me, you’re ambitious enough to want to master Arabic, untold linguistic, cultural, and spiritual riches will open before you like a treasure house opening to a magic password. And if you’re even more ambitious than me, you can study the various varieties of Amazigh (Berber) as well. Excerpt from the podcastK. Barrett Bilali: What I try to do is promote English and develop audiences here in Morocco that are English-centered or anglophone and create a space where they can communicate and expand.Kevin Barrett: That’s interesting, because my friends and co-conspirators here in Saidia, on the other side of Morocco from you, just created a brand new English language “Saidia City in English” page on Facebook.And yeah, Morocco is getting into English language because it’s the global language. Even though the American empire is crumbling. English isn’t.And that leads us to Morocco. We’ll get back to your recent posts on AI later. But first, comment a little bit about Morocco as a kind of a happening place. Everybody’s heard that Morocco is doing really well in soccer. They reached the semifinals in the last World Cup. They’re going to host the 2030 World Cup. They’re now heading into the

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link (where you can read the transcript of Chas Freeman’s talk)Australian Peter Myers feels uneasy about the prospect of China eclipsing the Zionist-occupied US as the great power with the most sway over his country. I think his fears are overblown. Who’s right? Watch our sometimes-fiery debate and sound off in the comments! (The debate on China starts in earnest at the 25:50 mark.)Most smart red-pilled people agree on many things. We’re all on the same page regarding the Kennedy assassinations, 9/11, and Zionism. We all support ending privately-created fiat funny-money and replacing it with public banking. We all want the US to stop fighting and provoking stupid wars waged under false pretenses. We all agree that Western mainstream media peddle lies and half-truths and deserve to be relentlessly attacked and ridiculed. And we are all sick of ever-escalating censorship.But there is one momentously important topic that we don’t all agree on: the rise of China, and what, if anything, could or should be done about it. Many critics of the US empire’s unbelievably evil and stupid policies frame their critique as follows: “The idiots running the US empire offshored manufacturing in the 1980s, thereby enabling China’s rise. They colluded with Israel’s 9/11 attack on New York and Washington and were deceived into wasting over $7 trillion destroying the Middle East on behalf of Zionism—a strategic disaster for the US. Instead of triangulating Russia, Iran, and China to contain the only serious challenger, China, they mindlessly attacked Iran and Russia, thereby driving them into China’s arms. Now China has eclipsed the US in PPP-adjusted GDP, and is threatening to leave the US in the dust in terms of technology and the military power it enables. We ought to radically revise our approach before it’s too late, by throwing all of our chips in the ‘contain China’ basket! If we don’t, China will eclipse the US empire and…gasp…rule the world! What a disaster that would be!”Those of us on the other side of the debate agree with that analysis, except for the last three sentences. We argue that a desperate, belated US attempt to prevent China from becoming a regional hegemon would be at least as foolish as the policies that preceded it. The first and most obvious reason to accept China’s rise philosophically is its near-inevitability. China’s large, smart, cohesive, highly-educated population makes it a natural regional hegemon. Its population of 1.4 billion boasts a civilization whose identity stretches back for millennia. For most of that period China represented almost a third of global GDP. That 30% share collapsed to single-digits during the 19th century, hitting a low of less than 5% around 1950 before rebounding to its current 20%+. Though the official figures tell us that the US is still ahead, boasting 25% of global GDP compared to China’s 20%, when adjusted for purchasing power parity the US share plunges to 15%, giving China a rapidly-increasing lead. Given the underlying factors and the momentum they generate, only drastic, catastrophic events could radically alter China’s trajectory vis-a-vis the US. Since global catastrophe is not an inviting prospect, US decision-makers ought to accept China as the Asian regional hegemon and global geostrategic equal of the US. The bottom line is simple: If US leaders follow the example of King Cnut by building themselves a throne on the beach and ordering the Chinese tide not to come in, they will fail. And if they unleash nuclear or biological weapons on the ocean in a vain attempt to stop the tide, they’ll merely drown themselves, and perhaps the planet, in unnecessarily toxic seas.The second reason to gracefully acquiesce in China’s rise is almost equally simple and obvious: It probably won’t be as bad as all that. During our debate, I repeatedly asked Peter Myers what was the worst-case scenario he feared emerging from China’s equaling or eclipsing the US as a regional and global power. His answers didn’t convince me. Peter charged China with “genocide” over its treatment of the Uighur people of Xinjiang and Chinese Muslims in general. Though I might join him in deploring specific Chinese policies and actions, Westerners charging China with genocide ought to compare pictures of Xinjiang and Gaza, and remember the Biblical line about specks in the other guy’s eye and beams in your own. (Another Australian, Gideon Polya, puts the 9/11-triggered Muslim holocaust death toll in the double-digit millions.) What’s more, I’m not convinced that the Chinese policies in Xinjiang have been all that unreasonable given the CIA-sponsored separatist threat. Nor am I convinced that China has been oppressing Muslims in general outside of Xinjiang. My Malaysian Muslim friends, no fans of China, don’t seem to think so. They say Chinese Muslims are for the most part doing fine, and actually gave me a beautiful coffee table book about Islam in C

Rumble link Bitchute linkPress TV is now joined by author and commentator John Steppling, who’s with us from Inderoy, Norway. We also have Kevin Barrett, joining us from Saïdia, Morocco. Gentlemen, welcome to the program. Let’s start off with Mr. Steppling: Please just give us your perspective on how events have transpired with regards to Venezuela.John Steppling: The targeting of ships off the coast of Venezuela seems to have entered into a new phase with the seizure of this oil tanker. The U.S. can’t invade Venezuela. They’re not capable of an actual land invasion, some kind of amphibious invasion with boots on the ground. They can’t do it. The American public has no appetite for the deaths of American military personnel either. So they’re going to avoid that at all costs.The original justification for blowing up these fishing boats in the Caribbean was that they were transporting fentanyl. The boats couldn’t even reach the United States. They don’t have the range for that. The cartel that they accused Maduro of being the head of doesn’t exist. It’s a mythical cartel.They—the US government—just keep inventing new stories, just keep inventing new justifications. And they’re not (plausible). They don’t even try very hard.Now they seize an oil tanker. It looks very good, but there’s some other tankers out there delivering oil. This is meaningless. It’s a little tiny drop in the bucket. It has some symbolic resonance, I guess. But the U.S. is not going to invade. They may bomb a few places, but they’re terrified that Venezuela will shoot back.So the US is a country that’s like a rabid dog that has been cornered. And it’s very dangerous in one sense because it’s unpredictable. Trump is trying to find things to do that will distract from Ukraine, Gaza, and Jeffrey Epstein, not necessarily in that order. So, you know, this is piracy. Is it illegal? Of course it is. Blowing up the fishing boats was illegal, too. But the U.S. doesn’t care. They’re flailing about, and they’re like a cornered dog that is snarling and yapping, but ultimately isn’t going to do much damage, I don’t think.Kevin Barrett, I’d like you to weigh in on the situation as well. Venezuelan officials have said that whatever the U.S. is doing, it’s just along the lines of justification, specifically alluding to the attacks on the fishing boats. Venezuelans, high ranking officials, say that it’s always been about Venezuela’s natural wealth, its oil, its energy and its resources. How would you explain what the U.S. is doing with regards to Venezuela, specifically this massive military buildup in the Caribbean?Well, I recently wrote an article posted at the Unz Review, that’s UNZ.com, pointing out that we’re living through a kind of a deja vu flashback to George W. Bush’s buildup to war with Iraq. In both cases we have preposterously false justifications for attacks on oil-rich nations. In the case of Bush Jr., they made up stories of Iraq having weapons of mass destruction that clearly didn’t exist. Now Trump’s people are making up even more ridiculous stories about a different kind of chemical weapon, fentanyl. But it’s widely known and admitted by everyone, including the U.S. government, that virtually all fentanyl consumed in the United States is manufactured in Mexico. Mexico, of course, is directly south of the United States. Venezuela is down in South America and has nothing to do with fentanyl. The fishing boats that Trump has been blowing up and murdering people and Hegseth has been ordering double-tap attacks to kill survivors—these are extremely grotesque war crimes. These fishing boats have nothing to do with any fentanyl. So that whole excuse is preposterous, just like the Iraq war excuses were.And Trump is beating his chest like a baboon, like Bush did in 2003, defaming the leader of the sovereign oil-rich nation that he wants to attack. Back then, Bush was calling Saddam Hussein an evil dictator. That’s the sort of rhetoric that we’re now hearing from Trump about Maduro.But what is this really all about? Well, it is largely about the fact that it’s an oil-rich country, and the United States right now is smarting under the sting of being slapped in Ukraine, being unable to leverage any power with China, and being in a position to lose a war with China over Taiwan. So what else can they do? Well, they can go try to attack a smaller country in the American hemisphere.But again, I agree with the other guest John Steppling. I don’t think that’s going to work. But I think the hidden factor here that isn’t being mentioned in the mainstream media is that it’s really not about oil, in the sense that the United States can buy Venezuelan oil. Maduro, as he recently said, will happily sell the United States Venezuelan oil at a perfectly reasonable price.Why won’t the United States take yes for an offer? It’s the same situation as with Saddam Hussein in 2003. The reason is that the United States is owned by Jewish Zionist gangsters who completely d

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News linkThis week’s False Flag Weekly News theme is inspired by J. Michael Springmann’s article "Israel: America’s Oldest Enemy.” Dr. Springmann is the State Department whistleblower who exposed the pre-9/11 Visas for Al-Qaeda program in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.Arabic news channels often eschew Israel in favor of the Zionist entity (الكيان الصهيوني). When they do mention Israel it is usually part of the expression the Israeli enemy (العدو الإسرائيلي). The former expression conveys the belief, near-universal in this part of the world, that “Israel” is not a legitimate nation-state. Instead, it is temporary settler colony, like the crusader kingdoms of the 12th and 13th centuries, that doesn’t belong there and will soon be gone. As for the epithet the Israeli enemy, it raises the question: whose enemy, exactly? Is “Israel” the enemy of the 420 million native Arabic speakers (“Arabs”)? Or of the roughly two billion Muslims, alongside the roughly 2.5 billion Christians? That would give “Israel” a grand total of 4.5 billion enemies, a solid majority of the Earth’s population. Certainly “Israel” is the expression of a Jewish religious war against Christianity and Islam. The first real Zionist was the self-proclaimed satanic antichrist messiah Sabbatai Tzvi, who called for the Jews to “return” en masse to the Holy Land during the mid-17th century. Ever since then, Zionism has been an expression of Jewish messianic-millenarian extremism. Zionists make the “Jewish state” the focus of their idolatrous worship. Implicit in their fanatical idolatry is the millenarian notion that “Israel” is part of some divine plan that will ultimately “repair the world” by restoring the Jewish people’s rightful and natural dominion over all other peoples. The Jewish Messiah, Jewish eschatology tells us, will be a military conqueror who exterminates most of the goyim (the non-Jewish peoples) and enslaves the rest. This messiah, they believe, will rule the world from a “rebuilt” blood sacrifice temple in Jerusalem, inaugurating a millennium of peace and prosperity and flourishing (for Jews) built on the extermination and enslavement of non-Jews.Here’s the big secret that Western mainstream media isn’t telling you: Israel’s biggest enemy isn’t the Arabs or the Muslims. It’s the Christians. The primary civilizational challenger to messianic-millennial Judaism has always been Western Christian civilization. Destroying Western Christian civilization has been the biggest preoccupation of messianic-millenarian Jews, whether in the guise of Marxists, Zionists, or hyperliberal secular humanists. They have done everything possible to undermine the Christian core of Western civilization, from the anti-Christian underpinnings of the American, French, and Russian revolutions, to the deliberate sabotage of Christian family values via sexual degeneracy, abortion, and feminism, to the current assault on the Christian ethnic-ideological core of Western countries through replacement immigration.What’s more, the Zionist entity’s genocide of the Palestinians is a symbolic war on Christianity. The Palestinians, many of whom are Christians, are the descendants of Jesus’s family. By slaughtering and oppressing them in the most horrific and disgusting ways that the perverse imagination can conceive, the messianic-millenarian Jewish nation that calls itself “Israel” is re-crucifying Jesus on a daily basis. When they train dogs to rape Palestinian prisoners, they are doing that to Jesus. When they burn children alive, they are burning alive the infant Jesus. When they celebrate shooting pregnant Palestinian women in the belly with “one shot two kills” T-shirts and memes, they imagine themselves killing the infant Jesus and his holy mother Mary with one Jewish-Zionist bullet.Jewish extremists use the Western media they dominate to obscure this reality, and to obfuscate their war on Western Christendom by promoting an illusory war between an imaginary “Judeo-Christian” West and the Islamic world. That fake war was conjured into imaginary existence by way of the Jewish-Zionist-orchestrated 9/11 human sacrifice. In reality, Western attacks on Muslim countries have been Jewish-Zionist projects. Their purpose is not just to weaken regional Muslim-majority nations that pose a threat to “Israel,” but also to weaken the Christian West, in preparation for its complete destruction by messianic-millenarian Jewry. Why do radical Jews hate Christianity so much? Both Christians and Muslims are viewed as enemies in traditional Judaism. Christians are symbolically viewed as the descendants of Esau, the dumb hairy redhead that the Jews’ eponymous ancestor “Israel” swindled so successfully. Muslims, for their part, are held to be the descendants of Ishmael, the illegitimate and correctly-disinherited offspring of Abraham’s handmaiden Hagar. Both of these mythic tropes are used by self-styled God-chosen Jews to explain why they are inheren