A Reformed Response to Theonomy
In the first of two episodes on theonomy, Jon and Justin seek to generally define theonomy and then respond to it theologically. The guys consider a confessional understanding of the threefold division of the law, the distinction between moral and positive law, and 1689 Federalism as safeguards against theonomy. Note: Semper Reformanda is included in today’s episode. Resources: 1689 Baptist Perspective: Confessionalism and Theonomy Why is Theonomy Unbiblical? Is the Law Relevant Today? Covenant Theology: Introduction & Overview
Theocast · Jon Moffitt
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (episodes.castos.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
In the first of two episodes on theonomy, Jon and Justin seek to generally define theonomy and then respond to it theologically. The guys consider a confessional understanding of the threefold division of the law, the distinction between moral and positive law, and 1689 Federalism as safeguards against theonomy.
Note: Semper Reformanda is included in today’s episode.
Resources: