The Resistance Library from Ammo.com

On this episode of The Resistance Library Podcast, Sam and Dave discuss the bombing of MOVE. If we told you that the Philadelphia Police Department literally dropped a bomb on a house in the city in the 1980s, you'd probably think that we had lost our minds. But, in fact, this happened on May 13, 1985, at the MOVE townhouse at 6221 Osage Avenue. The whole event was captured on camera and can easily be watched on YouTube for anyone who doubts that this happened. The case of MOVE is an unusual one, because they cannot simply be shoe-horned into the usual "they were just minding their own business and then the cops came in with overwhelming force" narrative that more or less applies at Ruby Ridge or at Waco. This is not to imply that the actions taken by the Philadelphia Police Department were appropriate – there were children inside the MOVE townhouse. However, it is important to note that MOVE had a history of violence. If nothing else, the bombing of the MOVE house in Philadelphia is an excellent example of a complicated situation with no easy answer. This is precisely what makes it worth close examination by those interested in government overreach and Second Amendment rights. You can read the full article "MOVE Bombing: The Story of How Philadelphia Became "The City That Bombed Itself" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Helpful Links: Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast, Sam and Dave talk about John Moses and the forgotten history and legacy of the father of modern firearms. John Moses Browning is known to firearms and Second Amendment enthusiasts primarily as a gunsmith, but he was more than that: He was also an inventor, an innovator, and perhaps one of the most successful firearm designers the world has ever seen. It's without question that he is the father of modern firearms as we know them. John Browning is arguably the man most responsible for modern firearms, including lever-action, pump-action, and auto-loading weapons. Browning was born into a Mormon settler family in Ogden, Utah, on January 23, 1855. His parents, Jonathan Browning and Elizabeth Clark, were Mormons who settled in Utah after the Mormon Exodus of 1847. A gunsmith himself, Jonathan often had young John in the shop alongside him, where the child learned concepts of manufacturing and engineering. The elder Browning also encouraged experimentation. By the age of 11, John had created his first firearm from castaway pieces and took it hunting, providing his family with three prairie chickens for the family's dinner. By the time he was 18, John Browning had taken over his father's business. In the spring of 1879, John married Rachel Teresa Child, who would eventually bear John 10 children, eight of whom survived infancy. On October 7th of that same year, John received the first of his 128 firearm patents, this one for the Browning Single Shot rifle. In 1880, John recruited his brothers and built what would become known as the Browning Arms Company. Although the business was successful, John was not satisfied. Rather than mass-producing firearms for commercial sale, Browning wanted to revolutionize the entire small arms industry. You can read the full article "John Moses Browning: The Forgotten History and Legacy of the Father of Modern Firearms" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Helpful Links: John Moses Browning: The Forgotten History and Legacy of the Father of Modern Firearms Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast, Sam Jacobs invites Joe Kent onto the show. Joe Kent is a father of two, a retired Special Forces veteran and the widower of Senior Chief Petty Officer Shannon M. Kent who was killed by ISIS in Syria. Kent is currently running for Congress from the 3rd Congressional District of Washington State. We had him on to discuss his campaign, as well as the way forward for the Republican Party. Listen now to our latest guest episode! For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Joe Kent's Links: Joe Kent for Congress @joekent16jan19 | Twitter @joekent16jan19 | Instagram Helpful Links: Resistance Library Read Our Article: How Big Tech and Corporate America Help Subvert the 1st and 2nd Amendments Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast, Sam and Dave talk about the forgotten history of Winchester Repeating Arms' iconic founder, Oliver Winchester. Winchester was born in Boston, Massachusetts, on November 30, 1810. While his life is largely indistinguishable from his career as a gun manufacturer, it's worth noting that, in addition to revolutionizing the American firearms market, he also served as the 32nd Lieutenant Governor of Connecticut as a Republican from May 1866 to May 1867, underneath Joseph Roswell Hawley. He was also one of the great philanthropists of his time, giving a lot of money in particular to Yale University, which is in New Haven. Winchester was born on the outskirts of Boston, at a time when there was still farming going on in those parts. His family were penniless farmers in a hardscrabble world. He had almost nothing in the way of formal education. What he did have, however, was a solid amount of business sense and no shortage of gumption. He was apprenticed as a church builder, but quickly began earning a tidy sum as the inventor of a new style of shirt collars for men, which constituted his first patent. Winchester began his business career making garments in New York and New Haven, and selling men's furnishings in Baltimore. After years of successful business, he started looking for new opportunities. Horace Smith and Daniel Wesson (you might have heard of their later endeavor, Smith & Wesson Revolver Company) acquired a rifle design and improved it with the help of shop foreman, Benjamin Tyler Henry (yes, that Henry). In 1855, they began manufacturing the "Volcanic" lever-action rifle. The company was incorporated as the Volcanic Repeating Arms Company. The largest stockholder was Oliver Winchester. You can read the full article "Oliver Winchester: The Forgotten History of Winchester Repeating Arms' Iconic Founder" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Helpful Links: Oliver Winchester: The Forgotten History of Winchester Repeating Arms' Iconic Founder Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast, Sam Jacobs invites Andrew Branca onto the show. Andrew Branca is a self-defense attorney who has been covering the Derek Chauvin show trial for Legal Insurrection. In this episode, he discusses not only the trial, but also the broader social ramifications of trial by mob. Listen now to our latest guest episode! For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Andrew Branca's Links: @LawSelfDefense | Follow Andrew Branca on Twitter Andrew Branca | LinkedIn Andrew Branca | Legal Insurrection The Law of Self Defense: The Indispensable Guide to the Armed Citizen Paperback by Andrew Branca Andrew Branca | Law of Self Defense Helpful Links: Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast, Sam and Dave talk about the history of the Bedford Flag. Dating back to the early 18th century, the Bedford Flag is America's oldest historically attested flag. Previously, historians thought the flag dated as far back as the 1660s, but this was later proven false, as the color "Prussian blue" did not exist until 1704. It looks very much like something carried into battle by medieval knights, so historians can be forgiven for looking so far back to find an origin for this flag. While the square shape evokes cavalry of old, the red color of the Bedford Flag makes it undeniably a cavalry flag. Its armored arm and sword harken back to the heraldic symbolism of the Massachusetts cavalry, which in turn dates back to the 1660s. The flag's Latin motto VINCE AUT MORIRE ("Conquer or Die") is strikingly similar to the motto of several Scottish and Irish clans, and the "Victory or Death" battle cry popular among the revolutionaries. Although its role in the American Revolution and the Revolutionary War is not completely certain, there is evidence to believe the flag was flown at the Battle of Concord through the diaries of Minuteman Nathaniel Page who participated in the battle. You can read the full article "Bedford Flag History: Vince Aut Morire - The Forgotten History of The Conquer or Die Flag" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Helpful Links: Bedford Flag History: Vince Aut Morire - The Forgotten History of The Conquer or Die Flag Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

It was Benjamin Franklin that said, "in this world, nothing is certain except death and taxes." On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast, Sam and Dave talk about the 16th Amendment, which implemented a federal income tax. The American Revolution was sparked in part by unjust taxation. After all, the colonists in Boston rebelled against Britain for imposing "taxation without representation," and summarily tossed English tea into the harbor in protest in 1773. Nowadays Americans collectively spend more than 6 billion hours each year filling out tax forms, keeping records, and learning new tax rules according to the Office of Management and Budget. Complying with the byzantine U.S. tax code is estimated to cost the American economy hundreds of billions of dollars annually – time and money that could otherwise be used for more productive activities like entrepreneurship and investment, or just more family and leisure time. The majority of these six billion hours sacrificed by Americans to Washington each year goes to complying with a tax that didn't even exist until 100 years ago – the federal income tax. Worse still, this tax has become a political weapon for Washington to incentivize certain activities (home ownership, charitable giving, etc.) and to punish others. It's a tax that follows Americans wherever they go in the world, and it's one that was originally sold to the American people by President Woodrow Wilson as a means of "soaking the rich" during the so-called Gilded Age. How did a country that was founded on the concept of limited government come to embrace such a draconian policy? And what does it say about Washington that tax reform has become synonymous with class warfare and corporate lobbyists? Listen now to learn the history of the 16th Amendment – which authorized the federal collection of an income tax – and how that power has ultimately meant the growth of Washington at the expense of just about everyone else. You can read the full article "The 16th Amendment: How the U.S. Federal Income Tax Became D.C.'s Favorite Political Weapon" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Helpful Links: The 16th Amendment: How the U.S. Federal Income Tax Became D.C.'s Favorite Political Weapon Taxes and Free Market Quotes: Quotes About Taxes and the Free Market Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Sam Jacobs invites Tho Bishop onto the show. Tho Bishop is the Assistant Editor of Mises.com and a proud Florida Man. He recently penned an article on a Rothbardian right as an alternative to the paleo-progressivism of Theodore Roosevelt. He believes this to be the fighting ideology that can effectively combat federal overreach and globalist tyranny alike. Listen now to our latest guest episode! Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Tho Bishop's Links: Tho Bishop | Mises Institute @ThoBishop | Twitter.com Tho Bishop | LinkedIn Tho Bishop | Muck Rack Tho Bishop | FEE.org Anatomy of the Crash: The Financial Crisis of 2020 by Tho Bishop Helpful Links: Murray Rothbard Clothing & Accessories Books on Libertarianism You Should Read Now Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

Picture this: You're driving home from the casino and you've absolutely cleaned up – to the tune of $50,000. You see a police car pull up behind you, but you can't figure out why. Not only have you not broken any laws, you're not even speeding. But the police officer doesn't appear to be interested in charging you with a crime. Instead, he takes your gambling winnings, warns you not to say anything to anyone unless you want to be charged as a drug kingpin, then drives off into the sunset. This actually happened to Tan Nguyen, and his story is far from unique. On this episode on the Resistance Library Podcast Dave and Sam discuss the topic of civil asset forfeiture, a multi-billion dollar piggybank for state, local and federal police departments to fund all sorts of pet projects. With its origins in the British fight against piracy on the open seas, civil asset forfeiture is nothing new. During Prohibition, police officers often seized goods, cash and equipment from bootleggers in a similar manner to today. However, contemporary civil asset forfeiture begins right where you'd think that it would: The War on Drugs. In 1986, as First Lady Nancy Reagan encouraged America's youth to "Just Say No," the Justice Department started the Asset Forfeiture Fund. This sparked a boom in civil asset forfeiture that's now become self-reinforcing, as the criminalization of American life and asset forfeiture have continued to feed each other. In sum, asset forfeiture creates a motivation to draft more laws by the legislature, while more laws create greater opportunities for seizure by law enforcement. This perverse incentive structure is having devastating consequences: In 2014 alone, law enforcement took more stuff from American citizens than burglars did. The current state of civil asset forfeiture in the United States is one of almost naked tyranny. Don't believe us? Have a listen. You can read the full article "Policing For Profit: How Civil Asset Forfeiture Has Perverted American Law Enforcement" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Helpful Links: Policing For Profit: How Civil Asset Forfeiture Has Perverted American Law Enforcement Weapons of War On Our Streets: A Guide to the Militarization of America's Police The USA PATRIOT Act: The Story of an Impulsive Bill that Eviscerated America's Civil Liberties Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Dave and Sam talk about Operation Fast and Furious. The ATF isn't all bad. In fact, they had a policy of letting illegal gun purchases go between 2006 and 2011. It ended up getting U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry killed on December 14, 2010, and let Mexican criminals get enough guns that they were found at over 150 crime scenes where Mexican citizens were either killed or maimed. And some of the guns were used in the November 2015 terrorist attack in Paris at the Bataclan. But other than that, it turned out just fine. (In case you're not picking up on it, we're laying on the sarcasm very thick right now.) You probably know what was officially called "Project Gunrunner" as "Operation Fast and Furious." Started under George W. Bush, this ATF policy audaciously grew under President Obama and became indicative of the perceived attack on American gun owners by both policy makers and their friends in the establishment media. It's one of many scandals of the Obama Administration that was never given as much press attention as, for example, Russia buying Facebook ads about NoFap and Pizzagate. Given that the guns run by the ATF were allowed to kill hundreds and that subsequent Congressional investigations resulted in Eric Holder, President Obama's Attorney General, becoming the first sitting cabinet member to be held in criminal contempt of Congress ever, this is shocking. At least for anyone still under the illusion that the establishment media is a fair and impartial source of information. It is a sad truth that in our world today, there are very few actual journalists. While conservatives, libertarians and patriots tend to chafe at the mere mention of journalists, it's worth noting that independent journalists – those not in thrall to big business and big government – fulfill an extremely valuable function of telling the truth and uncovering corruption. Case in point: The Fast and Furious scandal was broken by two independent journalists: David Codrea of The War on Guns and the late Mike Vanderboegh (who holds the distinct honor of being denounced by both Bill Clinton and the Southern Poverty Law Center) of Sipsey Street Irregulars. Indeed, when ATF agents at Clean Up ATF sought a way to secure protection for their whistleblowers, it was Codrea and Vanderboegh who put them in touch with Senator Grassley. Sharyl Attkisson and William La Jeunesse were two notable exceptions, but for the most part, the corporate media either ignored the scandal and/or claimed it was a "botched sting." It fell on Codrea and Vanderboegh to dig deep into the scandal and get the real story. Sit down and get ready to dig into what is perhaps the most egregious scandal of President Drone's administration – and there's a lot to pick from. You can read the full article "Operation Fast and Furious: The Forgotten History of the ATF's Notorious Gunwalking Scandal" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Helpful Links: Operation Fast and Furious: The Forgotten History of the ATF's Notorious Gunwalking Scandal The Benghazi Attack: The Forgotten History of the 2012 Attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya Vincent Cefalu: Operation Fast and Furious and Project Gunrunner Whistleblower, Author of Ratsnakes David Codrea: Gun Rights Advocate, Journalist at The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Sam and Dave talk about the wildcatter, Charles Newton. Wildcatters are a specific subset of firearms enthusiasts – nerds among nerds, if you will. And their king is Charles Newton. Newton was an attorney whose wildcatting was a hobby, not a career. However, his work in the world of wildcatting resulted in what is a sort of crowning achievement for a wildcatter: A company took up one of his creations, the .22 Savage Hi-Power, which Savage Arms began making officially in 1912. Soon after this, Savage began manufacturing the .250-3000 Savage (also known as the 250 Savage). The 22 Savage boasted a high velocity for the time it was developed, which in turn led to a shocking display of power. Its killing power was seen as nothing short of miraculous for larger prey with relatively soft skin, such as tigers – this was the golden era of big-game hunting and the African safari. Reverend H. R. Caldwell brought notoriety to the round by using it to bag 400-pound tigers in China. This was exploited to great effect in the early advertising for the round. You can read the full article "Charles Newton: The Forgotten History of the Wildcatter Who Created the .22 and .250 Savage" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Helpful Links: Charles Newton: The Forgotten History of the Wildcatter Who Created the .22 and .250 Savage Elmer Keith: The Forgotten History of the Firearms Author and Father of Big Bore Handgunning Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this special guest episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Sam welcomes Peter Quiñones onto the show. Peter Quiñones is the co-producer of The Monopoly on Violence Documentary, host of the Free Man Beyond the Wall podcast and Managing Editor at The Libertarian Institute. Sam had him on to discuss his recent Twitter ban, how he's ignoring it, the evil of public schools, and why most libertarians are getting it all wrong. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Peter's Links: Peter Quiñones | The Libertarian Institute By Any Memes Necessary! Peter R. Quiñones | Substack Free Man Beyond the Wall with Peter R. Quiñones Podcast Free Man Beyond the Wall with Peter R. Quiñones Patreon The Monopoly On Violence | Amazon Prime Helpful Links: Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Sam and Dave discuss the history of education in the United States. Public schools are so ubiquitous and ingrained in American culture that one could easily be forgiven for thinking that we, as a nation, have always had them. However, public schools are a relatively recent invention. Federal funding for public schools is a recent anomaly, dating back to the days of President Jimmy Carter. His successor, President Ronald Reagan, famously tried to dismantle the Department of Education to no avail. Public schools being an arm of the state are indoctrination centers. This becomes increasingly true as basic skills such as the old "three Rs" of "reading, writing and 'rithmatic" are jettisoned in favor of climate change, critical race theory and gender ideology – all of which are now part and parcel of a public education in the United States. As if this weren't troubling enough, public schools are largely funded by property taxes on housing. These taxes, which are paid generally on a bi-annual basis, are confiscated from people whose children do not even attend public schools. What's more, these taxes require people to effectively pay rent on owned property under penalty of losing their homes. We do not have to look far for an alternative to the world of public schools. Throughout most of American history, education has been the purview of parents, the church, and other private institutions. The rise of public education in the United States is a story of violence and coercion that is largely hidden from the public record. After reading this, you will never view public schools in the same light ever again. You can read the full article "The History of Private Schools: How American Education Became a Political Battleground" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Helpful Links: The History of Private Schools: How American Education Became a Political Battleground Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this week's episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Dave and Sam discuss what is considered by historians to be the prelude to World War II, the Spanish Civil War. As we talk about the lead-up to the Spanish Civil War, the situation will begin very much unlike modern-day America, however, it will become more like the contemporary domestic situation as time goes on. The main difference, of course, is that Spain was a monarchy for almost all of its existence until 1931. A republic was briefly declared during the years 1873 and 1874, but it didn't have much staying power and ultimately was not a transformative government in Spain. Following the First World War, the corrupt central government of Spain became increasingly unpopular and a military dictatorship, that of Miguel Primo de Rivera y Orbaneja, 2nd Marquess of Estella, 22nd Count of Sobremonte, arose. This fell in 1930, along with the abdication of the deeply unpopular King Alfonso XIII. This led to the creation of the Second Spanish Republic and a new constitution in 1931. It was a radically leftist constitution in a largely conservative and Catholic country. Women's suffrage, civil marriage, compulsory universal education, the nationalization of Catholic Church properties, the prohibition of Catholic religious orders from teaching in schools (and the Jesuit order entirely), as well as a provision allowing for the nationalization of any property that was for the "public good" were all components of the new Spanish constitution. In many ways it resembled the constitution of Weimar Germany, in that it was an attempt by the left to radically remake a country through constitutional means. The first election saw leftist elements firmly in the saddle, but the second, in 1933, was a major victory for forces of the right. However, because the conservative party had won a plurality in the parliament, and not a majority, the left-wing president of Spain invited the centrist party to form a government. Meanwhile the socialist government alleged electoral fraud, which caused them to become further radicalized. On the ground, a radical working-class movement became hostile toward the ostensibly left-wing government after the movement was suppressed violently by the military. Monarchist forces, with the explicit backing of Benito Mussolini and the implicit backing of King Alfonso XIII, as well as ideologically fascist forces led by José Antonio Primo de Rivera, began military drills, preparing for war. The streets of Spain became battlegrounds, with 330 assassinations, 213 failed assassination attempts and 160 religious buildings destroyed, with arson being the primary means of their destruction. The Spanish Socialist Workers' Party, formerly a fairly standard European social democratic party, began to cleave between forces who favored moderation and those who sought a more explicitly Bolshevik party. You can read the full article "The Prelude to World War II: The Spanish Civil War and Today's America" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Helpful Links: The Prelude to World War II: The Spanish Civil War and Today's America The Italian Years of Lead: Could the Secret "Strategy of Tension" Foreshadow America's Future? Resistance Library Sam Jacobs News Libertas Bella

On this special guest episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Sam Jacobs invites Michael Maharrey from the Tenth Amendment Center to discuss the rights of states. Michael Maharrey is the Communications Director of the Tenth Amendment Center, a group dedicated to preserving the rights of states to nullify unjust and overreaching federal laws. We discuss how the nullification movement is alive and well and a lot more robust than you probably think. You will definitely come away from this with a different perspective on States Rights. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Michael's Links: Michael Maharrey | Tenth Amendment Center Michael Maharrey | Biography Mike Maharrey | @mmaharrey10th SchiffGold Constitution Owner's Manual by Michael Maharrey Smashing Myths: Understanding Madison's Notes on Nullification by Michael Maharrey Nullification Objections: Dismantling the Opposition by Michael Maharrey Thoughts From Maharrey Head Podcast Helpful Links: Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Dave and Sam talk about the forgotten history of Belle Starr, an infamous outlaw. Basically everyone has heard of Jesse James. Slightly more obscure is Belle Starr, an outlaw from the same Wild West era, albeit one without the name recognition of James and his gang, with whom she had some ties. In her time she was known as the Bandit Queen and the Petticoat Terror of the Plains. Perhaps most interestingly of all, she was murdered and her murder remains officially unsolved to this day. Her birth name was Myra Maybelle Shirley (her family mostly knew her as "May") and she hailed from Carthage, Missouri. Although a prosperous farmer in the region, her father was considered the black sheep of his prominent, old-stock Virginia family. In fact, her father had been divorced twice when she came along, scandalous at the time. Starr was the daughter of his third wife, who had family ties to the Hatfields of the famous Hatfield-McCoy feud. You can read the full article "Belle Starr: The Untold Story of the American Outlaw Known as the Bandit Queen" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Helpful Links: Belle Starr: The Untold Story of the American Outlaw Known as the Bandit Queen The American Old West: How Hollywood Made It "Wild" to Make Money & Advance Gun Control Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Sam and Dave discuss the prison industrial complex in the United States. "Where you find the laws most numerous, there you will find also the greatest injustice." - Arcesilaus, Greek philosopher and student of Plato on power and personal sovereignty There's no two ways about it: The United States of America and its 50 state governments love putting people in prison. The U.S. has both the highest number of prisoners and the highest per capita incarceration rate in the modern world at 655 adults per 100,000. (It's worth noting that China's incarceration statistics are dubious, and they execute far more people than the United States. Indeed, the so-called People's Republic executes more people annually than the rest of the world combined.) Still, that's more than 2.2 million Americans in state and federal prisons as well as county jails. On top of those currently serving time, 4.7 million Americans were on parole in 2016, or about one in 56. These numbers do not include people on probation, which raises the number to one in 35. Nor does it include all of the Americans who have been arrested at one time or another, which is over 70 million – more than the population of France. For firearm owners in particular, the growth in this "prison-industrial complex" is troubling because felons are forbidden from owning firearms and ammunition under the 1968 Gun Control Act. As the number of laws has grown and the cultural shift for police has gone from a focus on keeping the peace to enforcing the law, more and more Americans are being stripped of their 2nd Amendment rights (not to mention other civil rights like voting – as of 2017, 6.1 million Americans cannot vote because of their criminal records). All told, eight percent of all Americans cannot own firearms because of a felony conviction. For American society as a whole, the prison-industrial complex has created a perverse incentive structure. Bad laws drive out respect for good laws because there are just so many laws (not to mention rules, regulations, and other prohibitions used by federal prosecutors to pin crimes on just about anyone). How did we get here? You can read the full article "Locked Up: How the Modern Prison-Industrial Complex Puts So Many Americans in Jail" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Helpful Links: Locked Up: How the Modern Prison-Industrial Complex Puts So Many Americans in Jail Weapons of War On Our Streets: A Guide to the Militarization of America's Police The USA PATRIOT Act: The Story of an Impulsive Bill that Eviscerated America's Civil Liberties Protection or Pain Treatment: Choosing Between Your Gun and Medical Marijuana Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this special episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Sam Jacobs invites Pedro Gonzalez onto the the show. Pedro Gonzalez is the assistant editor of American Greatness and what might be called a friendly critic of the Trump Administration. We discuss what went wrong and what a winning conservative movement of the future looks like. Come for the political analysis, stay for the synthwave track recommendations. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Pedro's Links: Pedro L. Gonzalez on Twitter | @emeriticus Contra Newsletter by Pedro Gonzalez | Substack Pedro Gonzalez Pedro Gonzalez | LinkedIn Pedro Gonzalez | Muck Rack Pedro Gonzalez | American Greatness Pedro Gonzalez | Conservative Partnership Institute Pedro Gonzalez | The American Mind American Greatness editor on how Trump's abandonment of populism affected 2020 election | The Hill Helpful Links: Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Dave and Sam discuss the federal law regarding owning a firearms and using medicinal marijuana. If you've ever filled out a Form 4473, you're familiar with the Question 11e: "Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or other controlled substance?" In case you thought there was any ambiguity with regard to medical marijuana, you were wrong. Indeed, there is a warning in bold right underneath the question that clarifies: "Warning: The use or possession of marijuana remains unlawful under Federal law regardless of whether it has been legalized or decriminalized or for medicinal or recreational purposes in the state where you reside." Regardless of what one thinks about marijuana, its legalization or the right of the federal government to regulate either drugs or the internal laws of the various states, the fact remains: As of now, possession, sale and cultivation of marijuana remains a federal offense. It is a Schedule I drug in the same category as heroin and cocaine. You might not like that and you might think such classifications are ridiculous. The federal government doesn't care. This is a particularly difficult issue for people who use medicinal marijuana for bona fide medical purposes, rather than as a sort of legal loophole to consume marijuana legally. Many people use medicinal marijuana for a variety of purposes including relief from pain, Alzheimer's symptoms, glaucoma, epilepsy and a number of complications related to cancer, including nausea and lack of appetite. The science on this is rather conclusive, so much so that Big Pharma makes legal synthetic THC pills known as marinol. For those who use medical marijuana and wish to protect themselves with firearms, there is a choice: you can keep your guns or you can keep your grass or you can break the law. You can read the full article "Protection or Pain Treatment: Choosing Between Your Gun and Medical Marijuana" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Helpful Links: Protection or Pain Treatment: Choosing Between Your Gun and Medical Marijuana Prescription For Violence: The Corresponding Rise of Antidepressants, SSRIs & Mass Shootings Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this guest episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Sam Jacobs has Benjamin Braddock on the show. Benjamin Braddock is a prolific Twitter user and writer for online publications such as American Greatness. We had him on to discuss the Thunderdome style of politics, whether or not the GOP needs a celebrity candidate for 2024 and the power of raw eggs. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Ben's Links: Benjamin Braddock on Twitter | @GraduatedBen Benjamin Braddock | American Greatness Helpful Links: Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

Today on the Resistance Library Podcast Dave and Sam discuss the obscure history of 10 sovereign states that gave up their independence to join the U.S. It is often said that before the Civil War, the United States "are," but after the War, the United States "is." This is a reference to the formerly theoretically sovereign nature of each state as compared to "one nation, indivisible." More than just the theoretic sovereignty of the individual states, the territory now comprising the U.S. has a rich history of sovereign states outside the control of the federal government. Some of these you've almost certainly heard of, but a lot of them are quite obscure. Each points toward a potential American secession of the future. Have a listen to learn about the strange history of these sovereign states. You can read the full article "America's Sovereign States: The Obscure History of How 10 Independent States Joined the U.S." at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Helpful Links: America's Sovereign States: The Obscure History of How 10 Independent States Joined the U.S. The Bennington Flag: A Pre-Constitutional Symbol of Freedom The Gonzales Flag: The Untold History of the Battle of Gonzales Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast, Sam Jacobs invites Robby Starbuck onto the show. Robby Starbuck is a director and producer running for the House of Representatives in Greater Nashville. We had him on to talk about how the average person can join in the fight to save the American way of life, the canary in the coal mine of freedom and the criminal attack on retail investors. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Robby's Links: Robby Starbuck on Twitter | @robbystarbuck Robby Starbuck - A New Kind of Republican Candidate | The Epoch Times Acclaimed Director and Producer Robby Starbuck to Run Against Representative Jim Cooper in 2022 | The Tennessee Star Helpful Links: Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

Today on the Resistance Library Podcast Dave and Sam discuss the Culpeper Minutemen and the history behind their iconic flag. The Culpeper Flag is often mistaken as a modern variation of the iconic "Don't Tread On Me" Gadsden Flag – and rightly so. What many don't know is that the Culpeper Flag was inspired by its Gadsden counterpart, and both have become touchstones of the Second Amendment Movement. While remarkably similar to its Gadsden relative, the flag of the Culpeper Minutemen is arguably cooler – and significantly more obscure. While it has the same coiled rattlesnake and "Don't Tread on Me" legend, the Culpeper Flag is white, it carries the additional motto "Liberty or Death," and when historically correct, a banner bearing the name of the Culpeper Minutemen. The rattlesnake had been a symbol of American patriotism since the time of the French and Indians Wars. In 1751, Benjamin Franklin wrote an editorial satirically proposing that, in return for boatloads of convicts being shipped to the American Colonies, that the Colonies should return the favor by shipping back a boat filled with rattlesnakes to be dispersed. Three years later in 1754, Franklin published his famous "Join or Die" comic. This early symbol of American unity urged colonists in Albany to join the collective defense of the American Colonies during the French and Indian Wars. The rattlesnake symbol once again became a popular mascot of American unity after the Stamp Act. You can read the full article "The Culpeper Minutemen Flag: The History of the Banner Flown by a Militia of Patriots" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Helpful Links: The Culpeper Minutemen Flag: The History of the Banner Flown by a Militia of Patriots Early American Militias: The Forgotten History of Freedmen Militias from 1776 until the Civil War Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this special guest episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Sam Jacobs has Wells King on the show. Wells King is the Research Director for American Compass, an organization that seeks to push labor-friendly policies in the conservative movement. With 40 percent of union voters going for Donald Trump in the 2020 election, it is clear that a fresh look at unions and workers' power is in order. Sam Jacobs and Mr. King discuss woke-ism in labor unions, the free market as a tool rather than a principle and proper role of government in the current housing shortage. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Wells' Links: Wells King on Twitter | @wellscking American Compass on Twitter | @AmerCompass American Compass | AmericanCompass.org Wells King Articles Helpful Links: War on the Suburbs: How HUD's Housing Policies Became a Weapon for Social Change Jeremy Carl: Senior Fellow at the Claremont Institute and Author at The American Mind Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On today's episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Sam and Dave discuss the Oregon Standoff and why it's important. When one talks about the Bundy Family, the first thing that springs to mind is the standoff in Nevada in 2014. However, perhaps even more important is the standoff and occupation at Oregon's Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in 2016. Indeed, the two events are often conflated because Ammon Bundy is the son of Cliven Bundy, the man who stood up to the federal government over "grazing fees" on Bureau of Land Management land. The occupation was a highlight for both the militia and the sovereign citizen movement as well as proponents of states' rights. The main argument from those occupying the land is that the federal government is mandated by law to turn over the land that they manage to the individual states in which the land sits. This, they argued, was particularly true of the Bureau of Land Management, United States Forestry Service, and United States Fish and Wildlife Service land. The 2016 Oregon standoff was over two ranchers convicted of arson on federal lands – despite the fact that the men, a father and son pair named Dwight and Steven Dwight Hammond, did not want their support. Harney County in rural eastern Oregon is one of the largest counties in the United States by land mass, but one of the smallest when it comes to population. With a mere 7,700 people, cows outnumber humans in Harney by a factor of 14-to-1. Nearly three quarters of the land in the county is federally managed. The Malheur National Wildlife Refuge was established by then-President Theodore Roosevelt in 1908. It's a large area of the county and surrounding area at 187,757 acres. You can read the full article "The Oregon Standoff: Understanding LaVoy Finicum's Death & the Management of BLM Land" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Helpful Links: The Oregon Standoff: Understanding LaVoy Finicum's Death & the Management of BLM Land The Waco Siege: What Happened When the Feds Laid Siege to the Branch Davidian Compound Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

Today Sam and Dave discuss Lysander Spooner on the Resistance Library Podcast. Lysander Spooner is an important – and not exactly obscure – figure in the history of the liberty movement. He's an idiosyncratic figure from the 19th century with no small cheerleading section in the 21st century. A bit of a throwback to a very different time, Spooner was a champion of the labor movement and was even a member of the First International at a time when socialists and anarchists coexisted peacefully within that movement. Perhaps one of the most interesting things about Spooner is that he ran a private company in direct competition with the United States Post Office. This endeavor predictably failed not because the American Letter Mail Company couldn't compete, but because Spooner was hamstrung by lawfare. Spooner was born in Athol, MA, in 1808, a descendant of Mayflower pilgrims and the second of nine children. His career as a lawyer set the template for the rest of his life's work: Spooner had studied under a number of prominent lawyers (a practice known as "reading law," which was much more common at the time). However, he did not have a degree and state law required that he study further under a lawyer. He considered this legal discrimination and went ahead and started practicing law anyway. In 1836, the state legislature got rid of the requirement. Indeed, Spooner was against any legal requirement for licensure of any profession, something that would come up again later on in his battle against the United States Post Office. This was part of Spooner's belief in a natural law, whereby any act of coercion was ipso facto illegal. Spooner's law practice was not a success, nor were his attempts to dabble in the real estate market. He moved back onto his father's farm in 1840. It was here that he hatched the plan for the American Letter Mail Company. You can read the full article "Lysander Spooner: The Forgotten History of the Man Who Started the First Private Post Office" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Helpful Links: Lysander Spooner: The Forgotten History of the Man Who Started the First Private Post Office Freedom, Individualism, and Anarchy: Great Lysander Spooner Quotes Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On today's episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Sam and Dave discuss collectible and antique firearms and how they can be used as an investment. It's an unusual means of investment, but one that we think will appeal to our listeners on a deep level: collectible weapons. There are a number of advantages to investing in collectible weapons that will appeal both to those who love weapons and those who keep an eye on their money. Indeed, this is a popular investment category for people who like something a little more durable than stocks, bonds and cryptocurrency. They can also provide protection during uncertain times. Antique weapons in particular can be an attractive means of investing – after all, like land, they're not making any more. Like any antique investment, it helps to have an eye for the material at hand. You'll have to be able to appraise both the current condition of the weapon and have some idea of how its value might appreciate in the future. You can read the full article "Collectible Weapons: How to Protect Your Wealth – and Your Family – With Valuable Guns" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 Helpful Links: Collectible Weapons: How to Protect Your Wealth – and Your Family – With Valuable Guns Matthew Larosiere: Director of Legal Policy at the Firearms Policy Coalition Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Dave and Sam discuss John Garand, the inventor of the M1 Garand. One of the most iconic American firearms of all time, the M1 Garand was the standard issue weapon for WWII and the Korean War. This is the forgotten history of the man who invented this .30-06 semi-automatic rifle and how it became a symbol of the American military. "In my opinion, the M1 rifle is the greatest battle implement ever devised." - General George S. Patton Any gun nut – er, "firearms enthusiast" – worth their salt has heard of the M1 Garand (it rhymes with "errand," by the way). This .30-06 semi-automatic rifle is one of the most iconic American firearms of all time, and was the standard-issue weapon for American infantry troops during World War II and the Korean War. Drill teams and honor guards continue to use this in the present day, such is its role as a symbol of the American military. Fewer, however, know about the life story of the man behind the weapon – John Garand, a Canadian-American engineer and weapons designer. Born one of a whopping 12 children on a Quebec farm, Garand's father relocated the entire family to Connecticut following the untimely death of the clan's mother in 1899. All six boys in the family had the official first name St. Jean le Baptiste, however, John Garand was the only one of them who used "Jean" as his first name. The other five used their middle names. The invention bug ran in the family, with several of his brothers sharing his penchant for innovation. Garand learned how to speak English while working in a textile mill sweeping floors. He later worked in a shooting gallery where he developed an interest in firearms, which, when combined with his naturally innovative nature and machining skills picked up in the textile mill, got him a job at a Providence, RI, tool-making company in 1909. In 1916, he relocated to New York City, where he continued working as a toolmaker, and practiced his rifle skills at shooting galleries on Broadway. You can read the full article "John Garand: The Forgotten History of the Man Who Invented the Iconic M1 Garand Rifle" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Parler: https://parler.com/profile/SamJacobs1776/posts Helpful Links: John Garand: The Forgotten History of the Man Who Invented the Iconic M1 Garand Rifle Commercial Ammo: The Untold History of Springfield Armory and America's Munitions Factories History of .30-06 Ammo Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

Today Dave and Sam discuss the disarmament of Native Americans by the U.S. government and the massacre at Wounded Knee. The Battle at Wounded Knee is a significant battle in American history, as it put an end to the Indian Wars and is marked as the last official defeat of the Native Americans. But what's not taught in history lessons is that Wounded Knee was one of the first federally backed gun confiscations in the history of the United States, and it ended in the massacre of nearly 300 unarmed people. During the late 19th century, American Indians were allowed to purchase and carry firearms, just as white men were. The colonial gun laws did not bar Native Americans from possessing firearms, yet that natural right was violated by government forces at Wounded Knee. And once the guns were confiscated, the battle ensued. When we look at the issues surrounding gun confiscation, Wounded Knee gives us an example of the devastation that an unarmed people can experience at the hands of their own government. This battle serves as a reminder to fight against gun confiscation and the gun control legislation that can lead to it. You can read the full article "The Wounded Knee Massacre: The Forgotten History of the Native American Gun Confiscation" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Parler: https://parler.com/profile/SamJacobs1776/posts Helpful Links: The Wounded Knee Massacre: The Forgotten History of the Native American Gun Confiscation Democide: Understanding the State's Monopoly on Violence and the Second Amendment Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Dave and Sam discuss gun control and the effect that racism has had on gun control in the U.S. "There's a direct correlation between gun control and black people control." - Stacy Swimp, President of the Frederick Douglass Society Every schoolchild knows that the Declaration of Independence declares that the basic equality of man is "self-evident." The United States Constitution enumerates what the inalienable rights only alluded to by the Declaration. An inalienable right is one that exists regardless of whether or not it is recognized by the state. For example, you have a right to free speech regardless of whether or not the Constitution recognizes it. Thus any restrictions on free speech are curbs of this pre-existing right, not an actual elimination of that right. One of them is the right to keep and bear arms. Another is the right to a speedy and public trial. However, particularly with the Second Amendment, there's long been a struggle between the ideals of America and the reality on the ground with regard to race. What's more, minorities in the United States are disproportionately the victims of violent crime. Both of these things together make it crucial to understand self defense and the Second Amendment from the perspective of race in America. Part of the problem is that, unlike European nations which grew organically, America is an invention of a handful of Englishmen. They founded the nation on a set of ideas and there has always been a tension between those ideas and the reality. This is, in some sense, unavoidable: reality will always have trouble living up to an ideal. A failure to live up to that ideal in the past according to terms established today doesn't make the entire project – or any specific part of it – worthless or suspect. Before we get into the meat of the matter, we should note that the American ideal has expanded the Second Amendment (and the rest of the Constitution for that matter) to de jure include all Americans. One can be skeptical of the notion of "progress" while seeing the moves to repeal race-based restrictions on firearms ownership as big steps in the right direction. Finally, it is worth noting – and we will do so at length later – that none of the racially-motivated laws on the books in America are uniquely American. Racism, in the sense employed by the average person not the expanded version used by left-wing ideologues, was not a uniquely American institution, but the norm throughout human history. You can read the full article "Gun Control and Racism: The Laws and Taxes Meant to Limit Minority Gun Ownership in America" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Parler: https://parler.com/profile/SamJacobs1776/posts Helpful Links: Gun Control and Racism: The Laws and Taxes Meant to Limit Minority Gun Ownership in America Roof Koreans: How Civilians Defended Koreatown from Racist Violence During the 1992 LA Riots Robert F. Williams: The Untold History of Black NRA Gun Clubs and the Civil Rights Movement The Wounded Knee Massacre: The Forgotten History of the Native American Gun Confiscation Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

Today on the Resistance Library Podcast Dave and Sam discuss the Sons of Liberty, a group of patriots who were the biggest supporters of the American Revolution. The Sons of Liberty flag is very meaningful to us, as it's the flag that inspired the backdrop of our logo. Its origins go back to 1765, when a secretive group of patriots known as "the Loyal Nine" was formed – the group behind the original Boston Tea Party. The flag was then known as "the Rebellious Stripes" and it was banned by the British king, the highest endorsement the Crown could give. The Sons of Liberty were perhaps the most radical group of American patriots during the pre-Revolutionary period, but the true Sons of Liberty had a relatively short lifespan. They were formed in response to the Stamp Act of 1765 and disbanded when the Act was repealed. Still, the name lived on as a popular brand name for the biggest firebrands of the American Revolution. Many of the members of the true Sons of Liberty are American legends who need no introduction. Samuel Adams. John Hancock. Patrick Henry. Paul Revere. Even Benedict Arnold counted himself among their number. It's unclear whether the original Sons of Liberty were a clandestine organization with an official membership or just a rallying point for anyone who opposed the Stamp Act. Ultimately, it doesn't matter. The unified identity of opposition to the Crown was the organization, whether it was official or not. The motto of the Sons of Liberty was a simple phrase known to virtually every American: "No taxation without representation." While its origins are largely shrouded in mystery and lacking firm documentation, many experts agree that, to the extent that it was an organization with members, it was founded by none other than famous rabble rouser Samuel Adams. You can read the full article "The Sons of Liberty Flag: How a Group of American Patriots Led the Colonies to Rebellion" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Parler: https://parler.com/profile/SamJacobs1776/posts Helpful Links: The Sons of Liberty Flag: How a Group of American Patriots Led the Colonies to Rebellion Asymmetrical Warfare and 4GW: How Militia Groups Are America's Domestic Viet Cong Founding Fathers Quotes: Our Favorite Quotes from America's Courageous Revolutionaries Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

The Nuge. Uncle Ted. Great Gonzo. The Motor City Madman. Today Dave and Sam are discussing the rock legend, Ted Nugent, in honor of his upcoming birthday. The list of conservative rock-and-rollers is pretty short. But even if you were only going to have just one, Ted Nugent would do the trick. Ted Nugent goes by many names, but he was born with the unassuming moniker Theodore Anthony Nugent in 1948, the third of four kids in Redford, MI. Part of a military family, Nugent's father was a career sergeant in the army. For his part, though, Nugent was of draft age during the Vietnam War, he flunked his physical and was declared unfit for military service. Today, however, he is a member of the U.S. Marshals Fugitive Felony Task Force. Nugent began his rock-and-roll career with the Amboy Dukes, one of the premiere psychedelic rock bands of the era. They replaced the equally legendary Shadows of Knight as the house band at The Cellar, a teen rock club in the Chicago suburb of Arlington Heights, IL. Their breakout hit was "Journey to the Center of the Mind," a song that is clearly about LSD use – but not to Uncle Ted, who is one of the most notoriously sober rockers in history. In fact, he was cited by Minor Threat's Ian MacKaye, and others of the early hardcore scene, as one of the biggest inspirations for the straight-edge movement. Indeed, The Nuge claims and proudly owns his role as the inspiration for this movement. In a VICE interview he said that he will work with anyone who is anywhere on the political spectrum (citing Rage Against the Machine's Tom Morello as both a friend and a collaborator), but that he's reticent to work with anyone who does drugs of any kind because he believes that it robs them of focus. You can read the full article "Ted Nugent: The Forgotten History of the Conservative Rock-and-Roller and Gun Advocate" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Parler: https://parler.com/profile/SamJacobs1776/posts Helpful Links: Ted Nugent: The Forgotten History of the Conservative Rock-and-Roller and Gun Advocate Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Dave and Sam discuss the idea of "woke capitalism". It's a rather strange claim of the American far left that their interests are opposed to that of corporate America, because there's virtually no evidence to support it. Quite the contrary: During the wave of Black Lives Matter rioting that took place during the early summer of 2020, American corporations marched in lockstep. Not only did they use social media to swear fealty to this political movement, but they also made massive internal changes in conformity with BLM propaganda. It's called "woke capitalism" and while it's not necessarily new, it's certainly more prevalent than it ever has been. The term itself was coined by conservative editorial writer Ross Douthat in 2018. He succinctly summed up what woke capitalism is: superficial nods toward cultural leftism that allow the company to do what it really exists to do – make money. You might be confused or think that there's something ironic or askew about major corporations backing supposed "rebel" ideologies. However, this stems from a very surface understanding of the topic. When we delve deeper into it, the motivation for large corporations siding with ostensibly "anti-capitalist" groups will come clearly into focus. You can read the full article "Woke Capitalism: How Huge Corporations Demonstrate Status by Endorsing Political Radicalism" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs45 Helpful Links: Woke Capitalism: How Huge Corporations Demonstrate Status by Endorsing Political Radicalism Cultural Marxism's Origins: How the Disciples of an Obscure Italian Linguist Subverted America Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On today's episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Dave and Sam talk about Eugene Stoner. Eugene Morrison Stoner, the father of the AR-15 and the M16, is a titan in the world of both military- and civilian-use firearms. If he had done nothing but design the AR-15, his name would go down in history. But, of course, he did so much more than that. In addition to changing the landscape of American firearms, as well as the world stage, Stoner was also the archetypal "self-made American man," working his way up from nothing on a high school education to forever change the world as we know it. Born in Gosport, IN, in 1922, Stoner attended high school in Long Beach, CA, before working at the Vega Aircraft Company installing armament. Once World War II started, he enrolled in the United States Marine Corps, specializing in Aviation Ordnance. He served in Northern China and the South Pacific. In 1945, at the war's end, Stoner went to work in a machine shop owned by Whitaker, eventually working his way up to design engineer. In 1954, he went to work as the chief engineer for ArmaLite, then a division of Fairchild Engine and Airplane Corporation. His first projects were forerunners of the AR-15, with creative names like AR-3, AR-9, AR-11 and AR-12. These were all prototype small arms that never saw production. He did, however, see success with the AR-5, which was used as a survival rifle by the United States Air Force. In 1955, Stoner completed the initial run of design on the ArmaLite AR-10. This was a revolution in the world of small arms – a weapon that boasted a compact size, was easy to fire and didn't weigh too much. The AR-10 was chambered for the 7.62x51mm NATO, and was first tested at the U.S. Army's Aberdeen Proving Ground in 1956. It beat the competition largely due to its comparatively compact size. Still, the weapon was originally rejected in favor of the T44, which became the M14, mostly because of its late arrival in the testing cycle. Dutch company Artillerie Inrichtingen manufactured the AR-10 under lease until 1960. But this didn't mean the AR-10 was anywhere near done. You can read the full article "Eugene Stoner: The Forgotten History of the Man Who Created "America's Rifle" – the AR-15" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs45 Helpful Links: Eugene Stoner: The Forgotten History of the Man Who Created "America's Rifle" – the AR-15 History of 223 Ammo Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Dave and Sam discuss the TSA, whose procedures and screening practices provide the appearance of enhanced security without actually making anyone more secure. Following the attacks of September 11th, Congress passed the Aviation and Transportation Security Act (ATSA), creating the Transportation Security Agency (TSA). The TSA replaced private security screening companies with one government agency. Since then, air travelers have bowed to pat downs, bans on water bottles and other inconvenient, intrusive procedures as the "new normal" at our nation's airports. But does any of this make us safer? The short answer is no, it doesn't. What's more, laid out below is the quantifiable evidence that the TSA is a massive boondoggle that has done little to keep Americans safe while they travel. Indeed, it might make us less safe by providing a false sense of security, as American politicians shy away from ever questioning the efficacy of the TSA (or other elements deemed necessary for "homeland security"). Perhaps more disturbing is the established record of TSA agents stealing from passengers. You're far more likely to get robbed by a TSA agent than you are to get protected by one, a shorthand for the bureaucratic state if there ever was one. Dave and Sam have an in-depth conversation about the history, practices and statistics of the Transportation Security Agency. Whether you're skeptical of the TSA efficacy, convinced of their incompetence, or just irritated about having to get groped to go on a plane, this episode is a must listen. You can read the full article "The TSA and Security Theater: Understanding American Airport Security Following 9/11" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs45 Helpful Links: The TSA and Security Theater: Understanding American Airport Security Following 9/11 Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

Today on the Resistance Library Podcast Sam and Dave discuss the Battle of Athens. This little known moment in history was part of an overall pan-racial resistance to anti-democratic government forms throughout the United States that took place after World War II. The fight for civil rights in America is not limited to black Americans. Nor is the American Revolution limited to the 1700s. Case in point: The Battle of Athens. This was a pitched physical confrontation lasting two days in 1946, but with roots stretching back into the 1930s. A corrupt political machine run by E.H. Crump was centered in Memphis, but had influence throughout the entire state of Tennessee. This extensive influence was used to alter the election laws and charters of cities and counties to make the electoral process more favorable to Crump and his men. Sheriffs and their deputies were paid on a fee system, whereby they received more money the more people they incarcerated -- with predictable results. Travelers and tourists were hit hardest, with buses traveling through Crump-controlled areas pulled over and (the entire bus) ticketed for drunkenness. This was felt particularly sharply in McMinn County, which was historically Republican. It has been alleged that the basis of Crump's political power was delivering this Republican stronghold to Democrat President Franklin Delano Roosevelt in the 1936 election. The Justice Department investigated election fraud there in 1940, 1942 and 1944, but declined to take action. The poll tax and politicized ballot counting were the most common methods of fraud, as well as that old standby of having dead people cast ballots. The advent of World War II made matters worse. Most of McMinn County's young men were off fighting the war. This meant that the county began scraping the bottom of the barrel when it came to appointing lawmen. Ex-cons were not considered unworthy and many were hired to help the county meet its needs. Gambling and bootlegging were permitted for those politically connected individuals within the county. To make matters worse, the machine was firmly in control of the newspapers and schools, and was the most gainful employment in the county. You can read the full article "Battle of Athens: The Forgotten History of the Tennessee Rebellion Against Local Government" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs45 Helpful Links: Battle of Athens: The Forgotten History of the Tennessee Rebellion Against Local Government Negroes With Guns: The Untold History of Black NRA Gun Clubs and the Civil Rights Movement Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On today's episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Sam and Dave discuss Antonio Gramsci and exactly what is "Cultural Marxism." You may have heard the terms "Cultural Marxism," "Critical Theory" or "Frankfurt School" bandied about. And while you might have an intuitive approximation of what these terms mean for America in the 21st century, there's a good chance that you don't know much about the deep theory, where the ideology comes from, and what it has planned for America – and the world. The underlying theory here is a variant of Marxism, pioneered by early-20th-century Italian Marxist politician and linguist Antonio Gramsci. Gramscian Marxism is a radical departure from Classical Marxism. One does not need to endorse the Classical Marxism of Marx, Engels and others to appreciate the significant differences between the two. He is easily the most influential thinker that you have never heard of. Marx's original idea was that Communism was a historical inevitability, an evolutionary transition that would lead to a bottom-up eruption of revolutionary violence sparked by the Proletariat's frustration and fury over having been used and abused by the Bourgeoisie for long enough that "the revolutionary subject" (Marx's term for the broad working class) would overthrow capitalism and usher in socialism. Gramsci, on the other hand, held that such a revolution was unlikely – particularly in the West, where general prosperity and the lassitude of relative contentment would tend to dull the working class' passion for a bloody, bothersome overthrow. In successful Western nations, a Marxist state was far more likely to develop through a slow, patient process of incrementalist takeover of the cultural institutions – the arts, entertainment, and news media, and most especially the schools and universities. As such, the weapon to be used for revolution was not the economic might of an organized working class, but a "long march through the institutions" (a phrase actually coined by German Marxist Rudi Dutschke), whereby every institution in the West would be subverted through penetration and infiltration. For Gramsci, culture was more important than either economics or politics. Gramsci's divergence from Classical Marxism was nothing short of brilliant; certainly, the results speak for themselves when one considers the social unrest that is gripping America and the West today. In a sense, we are living through the endgame of a Gramscian revolution. Throughout this article, we will use the term "Cultural Marxism" as a catchall to refer to this phenomenon, because it is the most all-encompassing and does not limit us to discussing any one specific variation (Gramsci, the Frankfurt School or what have you). Finally, we should briefly echo the words of Dr. Jordan Peterson on "the bloody postmodern Neo-Marxists," because he has helped raise awareness of the phenomenon: "It's not obvious by any stretch of the imagination why postmodernism and Neo-Marxism or Marxism proper would be aligned because postmodernism is an anti-grand narrative philosophical movement and Marxism is a grand narrative. The fact that these two things seem to coexist in the same space needs some explanation, because it's a very tricky thing to get to the bottom of." Because Cultural Marxism is ideologically distinct from postmodernism and deconstruction, we will not touch on either in this article, though they certainly have been influential on the international left. You can read the full article "Cultural Marxism's Origins: How the Disciples of an Obscure Italian Linguist Subverted America" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs45 Helpful Links: Cultural Marxism's Origins: How the Disciples of an Obscure Italian Linguist Subverted America Woke Capitalism: How Huge Corporations Demonstrate Status by Endorsing Political Radicalism Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On today's episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Dave and Sam discuss the USA PATRIOT Act. The USA PATRIOT Act provides a textbook example of how the United States federal government expands its power. An emergency happens, legitimate or otherwise. The media, playing its dutiful role as goad for greater government oversight, demands "something must be done." Government power is massively expanded, with little regard for whether or not what is being done is efficacious, to say nothing of the overall impact on our nation's civil liberties. No goals are posted, because if targets are hit, this would necessitate the ending or scaling back of the program. Instead, the program becomes normalized. There are no questions asked about whether the program is accomplishing what it set out to do. It is now simply a part of American life and there is no going back. The American public largely accepts the USA PATRIOT Act as a part of civic life as immutable, perhaps even more so than the Bill of Rights. However, this act – passed in the dead of night, with little to no oversight, in a panic after the biggest attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor – is not only novel, it is also fundamentally opposed to virtually every principle on which the United States of America was founded. It might not be going anywhere anytime soon, but patriots, liberty lovers and defenders of Constitutional government should nonetheless familiarize themselves with the onerous provisions of this law, which is nothing short of a full-throttle attack on the American republic. You can read the full article "The USA PATRIOT Act: The Story of an Impulsive Bill that Eviscerated America's Civil Liberties" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs45 Helpful Links: The USA PATRIOT Act: The Story of an Impulsive Bill that Eviscerated America's Civil Liberties The 9/11 Attacks: Understanding Al-Qaeda and the Domestic Fall-Out from America's Secret War The TSA and Security Theater: Understanding American Airport Security Following 9/11 Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

Trigger Warning: On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Dave and Sam discuss Americans obsession with safety and the rise of political correctness. It's a common refrain: We have bubble-wrapped the world. Americans in particular are obsessed with "safety." The simplest way to get any law passed in America, be it a zoning law or a sweeping reform of the intelligence community, is to invoke a simple sentence: "A kid might get hurt." Almost no one is opposed to reasonable efforts at making the world a safer place. But the operating word here is "reasonable." Banning lawn darts, for example, rather than just telling people that they can be dangerous when used by unsupervised children, is a perfect example of a craving for safety gone too far. Beyond the realm of legislation, this has begun to infect our very culture. Think of things like "trigger warnings" and "safe spaces." These are part of broader cultural trends in search of a kind of "emotional safety" – a purported right to never be disturbed or offended by anything. This is by no means confined to the sphere of academia, but is also in our popular culture, both in "extremely online" and more mainstream variants. Why are Americans so obsessed with safety? What is the endgame of those who would bubble wrap the world, both physically and emotionally? Perhaps most importantly, what can we do to turn back the tide and reclaim our culture of self-reliance, mental toughness, and giving one another the benefit of the doubt so that we don't "bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security," as President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned us about? You can read the full article "Bubble-Wrapped Americans: How the U.S. Became Obsessed with Physical and Emotional Safety" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs45 Helpful Links: Bubble-Wrapped Americans: How the U.S. Became Obsessed with Physical and Emotional Safety Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

Today Sam and Dave discuss 4GW, or Fourth Generation Warfare. When one discusses the real reason for the Second Amendment – the right of citizens to defend themselves against a potentially tyrannical government – inevitably someone points out the stark difference in firepower between a guerrilla uprising in the United States and the United States government itself. This is not a trivial observation. The U.S. government spends more on the military than the governments of China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, India, France, United Kingdom, and Japan combined. Plus, the potential of a tyrannical government is arguably upon us – with the federal government spying on its own citizens, militarizing local police departments with equipment and tactics from the War on Terror, and repeatedly searching Americans, which desensitizes them to this invasive process. There is much historical precedent, however, for guerrilla uprisings defeating more powerful enemies. For instance, the Cold War saw both superpowers brought to their knees by rural farmers – for the Soviets, their adventure in Afghanistan against the Mujahideen, and for the United States, the Vietnam War against the Viet Cong. In both cases, nuclear weapons could have been used against the guerrilla uprising, but were not. Even assuming the use of nuclear weapons from the position of total desperation, it's hard to imagine they would have made much of a difference in the final outcome of either conflict. Unlike the invading armies, the local resistance enjoyed both broad-based support as well as knowledge of the local terrain. Now imagine such a scenario in the United States. You wouldn't be the first person to do so. From Red Dawn to James Wesley, Rawles' Patriots series, there is a relatively long-standing tradition of American survival literature about the hoi polloi resisting the tyranny of big government, either before or after a collapse. For the purposes of this article, consider what a domestic American terrorist or freedom fighter (after all, the label is in the eye of the beholder) organization based on the militia movement would look like in open revolt against the United States government. In the spirit of levity, we'll call them the "Hillbilly Viet Cong." They would most likely find their largest numbers in Appalachia, but don't discount their power in the American Redoubt, or the more sparsely populated areas of the American Southwest, including rural Texas. Here we have tens of thousands of Americans armed to the teeth with combat experience, deep family ties to both the police and the military, extensive knowledge of the local geography, and, in many cases, survivalist training. Even where they are not trained, militant and active, they enjoy broad support among those who own a lot of guns and grow a lot of food. On the other side, you have the unwieldy Baby Huey of the rump U.S. government's military, with some snarky BuzzFeed editorials serving as propaganda. Could the Hillbilly Viet Cong take down the USG? Maybe, maybe not. But it's difficult to imagine that the USG could take them down. Indeed, even with a number of nasty little toys on the side of the federal government, we live in an age of a technologically leveled playing field. This is true even when it comes to instruments of warfare. While the USG has nuclear weapons, it's worth remembering that a pound of C4 strapped to a cheap and readily available commercial-grade drone is going to break a lot of dishes. This sort of guerrilla insurgency has a name: It's called fourth-generational warfare (4GW), and you might be surprised to learn that you already live in this world. You can read the full article "Asymmetrical Warfare and 4GW: How Militia Groups Are America's Domestic Viet Cong" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs45 Helpful Links: Asymmetrical Warfare and 4GW: How Militia Groups Are America's Domestic Viet Cong Battle of Athens: The Forgotten History of the Tennessee Rebellion Against Local Government No Go Zones: A Guide to Western Failed States and European Secessionist Movements The TSA and Security Theater: Understanding American Airport Security Following 9/11 Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Dave and Sam discuss Joe Biden's stance on the Second Amendment. The one-two punch of the Coronavirus pandemic, and the civil unrest of early 2020, led to an unprecedented growth in firearms ownership in America. All told, there were about two million firearms sold in the month of March 2020 alone. Between March and July, an additional three million were sold, with about half of those happening in the month of June. Ammunition sales have similarly spiked, with record sales occurring on this website. However, gun owners don't need a report to know that there has been a massive surge in demand for ammunition. They need only go down to their local gun store and see that all of the most common rounds are in short supply, sold out or being rationed at the point of sale. But it's not just guns and ammo. There has also been a significant increase in the number of Americans obtaining their concealed carry weapons permit and packing on a daily basis. Forbes magazine estimates that 20 million Americans are now carrying as part of their everyday life. The flipside of this is that Joe Biden's 2020 campaign has been perhaps the most radically anti-Second Amendment campaign on record. Former Vice President Biden is very proud of his role in spiriting the 1994 gun ban into passage. If he's elected, we will see an expansion of the power of the federal government and attacks on the rights of Americans that will not be restricted to the ownership of firearms. As president, Biden would resume the Obama-era attacks on the suburbs ended by President Trump, give citizenship (and voting rights) to nearly 30 million illegal aliens and use the Federal Reserve to address a "racial wealth gap." However, Biden's desire to erode the Second Amendment deserves special attention. It is a radical agenda that will gut the right to bear arms in this country. Does that sound like bluster and hyperbole? It's not. You can read the full article "Joe Biden on Gun Control: Understanding Biden's 2020 Platform and the Second Amendment" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs45 Helpful Links: Joe Biden on Gun Control: Understanding Biden's 2020 Platform and the Second Amendment The Biden Plan To End Our Gun Violence Epidemic Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Sam and Dave discuss what a constitutional republic is versus a pure democracy and how the U.S. election process has changed since its founding. Conservatives are generally quick to point out that America is a republic, not a democracy. But what really is the difference, and are they even right? Voting in America has changed considerably since the days of our founding. Back then, the government didn't even print official ballots. Instead, you got ballots from the candidate who wanted your support. Sometimes voting took place in public, so everyone knew who you voted for. And, of course, the franchise was largely restricted to white, male property owners. Now, anyone who turns 18 can vote. And the Democratic Party wants to increase ballot access by automatically registering anyone who gets a driver's license. Democrats even pushed for mail-in ballots for the 2020 election to make voting even easier – and more open to voter fraud. But is any of this a good thing? Indeed, it is worth considering the transformation of the United States from a Constitutional Republic, ruled by law with the input of the people, to a total democracy, where the will of the people dominates all other discussion. You can read the full article "Constitutional Republic vs. Pure Democracy: How the U.S. Election Process Has Changed" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs45 Helpful Links: Constitutional Republic vs. Pure Democracy: How the U.S. Election Process Has Changed Battle of Athens: The Forgotten History of the Tennessee Rebellion Against Local Government Founding Fathers Quotes on Government, Democracy, and Placing Power in the People Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Dave and Sam discuss farm subsidies in the United States. Farm subsidies are perhaps the ultimate, but secret, third rail of American politics. While entitlements are discussed out in the open, farm subsidies are rarely talked about – even though they are the most expensive subsidy Washington doles out. All told, the U.S. government spends $20 billion annually on farm subsidies, with approximately 39 percent of all farms receiving some sort of subsidy. For comparison, the oil industry gets about $4.6 billion annually and annual housing subsidies total another $15 billion. A significant portion of this $20 billion goes not to your local family farm, but to Big Aggie. (Note that this $20 billion annual farm subsidy figure doesn't take into account the 30+ years of ethanol subsidies to the corn industry nor export subsidies to U.S. farmers issued by the USDA.) The government never properly explains why this is. Certainly small farmers are growing their crops at enormous risk. However, it's not clear that agriculture is any different than other high-risk industries – especially because the United States is blessed with some of the most fertile farmland in the world, and a highly skilled labor force. Subsidies don't just cost taxpayers, an expense that might properly be justified by showing a return on investment. Subsidies also provide powerful disincentives against innovation, as well as cost effectiveness and diversification of land use. There is also a strong case to be made that farm subsidies are a major driver of the obesity and cancer epidemic in the United States. Every time Washington interferes in the private sector, they are picking winners and losers. The winners chosen are companies producing food that's high in calories and low in nutritional density – and that helps make Americans sick and fat, because it distorts what food is available at what price. While President Trump has sometimes discussed reducing farm subsidies, the solution to the problem is much more radical – the total elimination of all farm subsidies from the federal budget. You can read the full article "Food Is Freedom: How Washington's Food Subsidies Have Helped Make Americans Fat and Sick" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs45 Helpful Links: Food Is Freedom: How Washington's Food Subsidies Have Helped Make Americans Fat and Sick Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On today's episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Sam and Dave discuss the current state of America's suburbs and the war against single-family housing. There are few things more synonymous with the American way of life than the suburbs. While certainly not without problems, the suburbs have been home to middle class Americans since the end of World War 2, and even before. But the suburbs are under attack from certain elements of the left as a source of social inequality and (what else?) "white privilege" and "white supremacy." If you are alarmed by this article, that's a good thing. Because these elements of the American left seek nothing more than the total destruction of your way of life, from the people who live in your communities to the types of houses that you live in to the places where you will be allowed to shop and how you get from one place to another. The policy is called Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH), but beyond this specific HUD policy, there's a philosophical and political attack on suburbs that goes well in excess of any single policy. There is, without mincing words, a War on the Suburbs in America. It is a war not against a geographical location or a type of housing or community, but an attack on a way of life. You can read the full article "War on the Suburbs: How HUD's Housing Policies Became a Weapon for Social Change" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs45 Helpful Links: War on the Suburbs: How HUD's Housing Policies Became a Weapon for Social Change Woke Capitalism: How Huge Corporations Demonstrate Status by Endorsing Political Radicalism Bowling Alone: How Washington Has Helped Destroy American Civil Society and Family Life Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

If you say "September 11" most people automatically think of the attacks on the World Trade Center buildings and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. What they probably don't even remember happened on September 11, were the attacks on the United States Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012. On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Dave and Sam discuss the two attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Once the Libyan Revolution began in February 2011, the CIA began placing assets in the region, attempting to make contacts within the region. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, whose name and image would soon become synonymous with the Benghazi attacks, was the first liaison between the United States and the rebels. The task before the American intelligence community at that time was securing arms in the country, most notably shoulder-fired missiles, taken from the Libyan military. Eastern Libya and Benghazi were the primary focal points of intelligence-gathering in the country. But there was something else at work here: The CIA was using the country as a base to funnel weapons to anti-Assad forces in Syria, as well as their alleged diplomatic mission. You can read the full article "The Benghazi Attack: The Forgotten History of the 2012 Attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs45 Helpful Links: The Benghazi Attack: The Forgotten History of the 2012 Attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On today's episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Dave joins Sam Jacobs as a new host. They discuss the civil unrest of the late 1960s and early 1970s. As the summer of 2020 dawned, left-wing radical groups began rioting and taking over parts of America's cities. While this specific form of left-wing violence is new, left-wing violence itself is far from new in the United States. Indeed, one of the most hidden and concealed parts of recent American history is the extensive left-wing violence that began in the late 1960s and continued into the 1980s. At first, one might think that these were isolated incidents of small-scale "protest" or even minor violence. However, upon even brief examination, we find out that the outpouring of leftist violence over this time period was anything but minor. The most likely explanation for why you have never heard of this until now is that the events of these years have been consciously buried by those who would prefer you not know about them. As the left once again ratchets up both its rhetoric and its physical violence, it's time to re-explore this period of American history. What started as a non-violent student movement quickly escalated into a campaign of terrorism against the American people. And while the similarities may not be terribly striking yet, astute readers of this article will quickly see the world in which we live more and more closely resembling the Days of Rage. You can read the full article "America's 'Days of Rage': The Extensive Left-Wing Bombings & Domestic Terrorism of the 1970s" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs45 Helpful Links: America's "Days of Rage": The Extensive Left-Wing Bombings & Domestic Terrorism of the 1970s Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Dan and Sam discuss the history of Jim Crow in the American South, which is one the Democratic Party would rather you forget. Black voters have voted en masse for the Democratic Party since the mid-60s and the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act and the social welfare programs of the Great Society. This solidified black voters behind the Democratic Party, but they had been moving there since the New Deal. However, it's a historical anomaly in the United States. The traditional home of the black voter was the Republican Party, due to its historical role in ending slavery and introducing Reconstruction Acts and Amendments to the Constitution. It also did not help that the Democratic Party was the party of Jim Crow, a system of legally enforced segregation present throughout the American South in the aftermath of the Civil War. You can read the full article "Democrats & Jim Crow: A Century of Racist History the Democratic Party Prefers You'd Forget" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs45 Helpful Links: Democrats & Jim Crow: A Century of Racist History the Democratic Party Prefers You'd Forget Black America Before LBJ: How the Welfare State Inadvertently Helped Ruin Black Communities Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Sam Jacobs invites Andy Marcantel to the show to discuss gun rights in America. Andrew Marcantel is a criminal defense attorney with Attorneys for Freedom in Arizona. He identifies as an anarchist and is an experienced defender of Second Amendment rights in the trenches of the American courts. We had him on to talk about both the philosophical and practical aspects of Second Amendment rights in America today. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs45 Andy Marcantel's Links: Andrew Marcantel | Attorneys for Freedom Andrew Marcantel | Lawyer Profile Other Helpful Links: The Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

On this episode Sam invites Mark Thornton onto the show. Together they discuss the economics of slavery and the long lasting effects of it on economies. Mark Thornton is an economic historian and a senior fellow with the Mises Institute. While everyone knows a bit about slavery, few think about the economics of it. It is the contention of Thornton that slavery was not a profitable institution in the antebellum South and that its after effects continue to drive the industrial underdevelopment of the region today. Mark's Links: Mark Thornton | Mises Institute Mark Thornton Books on Amazon Mark Thornton Other Helpful Links: The Resistance Library Sam Jacobs For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs45

On this episode Dan and Sam discuss deplatforming and corporate gun control. Anyone familiar with the Bible is familiar with the Mark of the Beast: Without this mark, no man may buy or sell. Regardless of one's religious faith or lack thereof, there is an illustrative case in this biblical story: When one cannot buy or sell, one is metaphorically up the creek. Short of producing everything one needs oneself, buying and selling are necessary parts of virtually every modern person's life. In our modern world, we can begin to see a sort of Mark of the Beast: While ideas and even objects aren't banned, they are increasingly difficult to come by, not due to government fiat, but due to the machinations of corporations hostile to the American values of freedom. One can be in favor of the free market while recognizing a simple truth: There is no way that America's Founding Fathers would have sat on their hands while five corporations dominated American discourse and commerce. It is hard to imagine, for example, the Founders suffering a single private bank processing most of the payments in the United States and refusing to do business with gun merchants. Alternately, one can scarcely imagine that the Founders would have sat still for three companies – all of them hostile toward American values and the Constitution – dominating political discourse and deplatforming anyone who opposed them. This is the situation in which we find ourselves as a nation today: Guns are not illegal, but private companies will make it increasingly difficult to buy, sell or own them – up to and including pulling your bank account. You have all the freedom of speech you like, but prepare to be deplatformed or have your voice buried by large tech corporations with their thumb on the scale of American discourse. As the American economy has become more corporatist – such that the market is controlled by the interrelation between monolithic mega-corporations, Wall Street and the state – and less capitalistic and dynamic, the American press and economy are now being dominated by forces hostile toward the American public and American values. No less an authority than James Madison warned Americans that the First Amendment alone was not enough to protect free speech. In Federalist No. 47 and Federalist No. 51, he argued that the separation of powers was necessary to protect free speech by preventing one branch of government from accumulating too much power at the expense of the others and, indeed, the rest of society at large. This is an important point to remember when considering the First Amendment implications of Big Tech and its war on free speech and gun freedom. The Founding Fathers did not live in a world where a few large corporations had more power than the (incredibly limited and power impoverished) government had, either at the federal or the state level. It's doubtful that they could have conceived of such a thing. But they did carefully consider the problem of centralized power as it pertained to the rights enshrined in the Constitution. At the end of the day, the Constitution is just a piece of paper with no ability to enforce itself. What's more, if the Founders did not address the notion that the private sector could meaningfully and substantially circumvent rights for all Americans, it was simply because they could not conceive of such a thing, not because they were writing the private sector a blank check. You can read the full article "Deplatformed: How Big Tech Companies & Corporate America Subvert the Second Amendment" at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs45 Helpful Links: Deplatformed: How Big Tech Companies & Corporate America Subvert the Second Amendment Founding Fathers Quotes on Guns and the Second Amendment's Right to Keep & Bear Arms The U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights: An Interactive Guide to the Articles and Amendments Resistance Library Sam Jacobs