PLAY PODCASTS
253 | Realignment Double-Header: Is a U.S. Conflict with China Inevitable?
Episode 258

253 | Realignment Double-Header: Is a U.S. Conflict with China Inevitable?

New Format: In a special, two-part episode, two guests join The Realignment to provide differing perspectives on a pressing issue. First, Dr. Aaron Friedberg, Princeton professor and author of Getting China Wrong joins to argue why the post-Cold War "engagement" approach to China failed, and how the U.S. should redefine the relationship. Second, Zachary Karabell, previous Realignment guest and author of Inside Money: Brown Brothers Harriman and the American Way of Power, joins to discuss his NYT op-ed arguing that the U.S. should prioritize pushing back against actual Russian aggression as opposed to hypothetical Chinese actions.

The Realignment · Aaron Friedberg, Zachary Karabell, Mashall Kosloff

June 9, 20221h 53m

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (chrt.fm) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

SUBSCRIBE & SUPPORT THE SHOW: realignment.supercast.com

This episode and our expanded coverage are made possible thanks to our Supercast subscribers. If you can, please support the show above.

REALIGNMENT NEWSLETTER: https://therealignment.substack.com/

BOOKSHOP: https://bookshop.org/shop/therealignment

Email us at: [email protected]

New Format: In a special, two-part episode, two guests join The Realignment to provide differing perspectives on a pressing issue. First, Dr. Aaron Friedberg, Princeton professor and author of Getting China Wrong joins to argue why the post-Cold War "engagement" approach to China failed, and how the U.S. should redefine the relationship. Second, Zachary Karabell, previous Realignment guest and author of Inside Money: Brown Brothers Harriman and the American Way of Power, joins to discuss his NYT op-ed arguing that the U.S. should prioritize pushing back against actual Russian aggression as opposed to hypothetical Chinese actions.