The People’s Court Podcast

The plaintiff rented a townhouse to the defendant. He says he ultimately had to evict her because her checks kept bouncing. He says the house was badly damaged and the defendant left large buckets of urine inside. He’s suing for rent and damages. The defendant argues she doesn’t owe him anything. She claims the plaintiff is only suing her because he wants to remodel his house. Then, the plaintiff says she was walking her dog one day when the defendant’s pit bull ran out of a house and attacked her puppy. The plaintiff’s dog had to have part of her tail amputated, so she’s suing for vet bills and training classes. The defendant says she offered to pay for the vet bills, but the plaintiff kept refusing. Plus, the plaintiff brings her ex-boyfriend to court. She says she loaned him money to help pay for rent and utilities, but he has not paid her back, so she’s suing. The defendant argues he doesn’t owe her any money. He’s countersuing for the price of a couch. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff ordered hair extensions from the defendant’s shop. When the plaintiff went to pick them up, she claims they were the wrong length, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant says the plaintiff is suing him for no good reason. If she didn’t want the hair extensions, she shouldn’t have left his shop with them. Then, the plaintiff rented a house to the defendant. She claims the defendant sold the shed on her property to another person, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff gave her permission to move the shed to make room for a pool. The defendant is countersuing for pain and suffering. Plus, the plaintiff sold the defendant a machine to charge car air conditioning systems, but he hasn’t paid her in full, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists he and the plaintiff agreed upon a lower price than the plaintiff says. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff went to the defendant’s dental office to replace an old bridge. The plaintiff believes the defendant improperly installed teeth in his mouth, causing further damage, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says he suggested a particular procedure, but the plaintiff begged for a cheap denture that wasn’t the best option. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The defendant hired the plaintiff’s company to do some electrical work on his building. However, the plaintiff claims the defendant refuses to pay what he owes, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant denies owing because he claims the plaintiff only restored electric service to the third floor, leaving him in the dark on the first and second. Then, the plaintiff claims his friend, the defendant, borrowed his motorcycle and crashed it into a car, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff’s mother asked her son to move her motorcycle, but the plaintiff was drunk, so the defendant offered to help. When the defendant drove the motorcycle, he claims the plaintiff failed to tell him the brakes weren’t working. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff ordered hair extensions from the defendant’s shop. When the plaintiff went to pick them up, she claims they were the wrong length, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant says the plaintiff is suing him for no good reason. If she didn’t want the hair extensions, she shouldn’t have left his shop with them. Plus, the plaintiff brought his motorcycle into the defendant’s shop for repair, but he claims the defendant’s workers intentionally put grease on his tires so that he’d have to return for more work. The minute he got out of the shop, the plaintiff says the grease caused him to crash into a van, so the plaintiff is suing for damages. The defendant insists his workers would never do such a thing, and the crash was clearly the plaintiff’s fault. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant to custom create balloon centerpieces for her wedding. The plaintiff was horrified by the result. The balloons didn’t have enough helium in them and some even deflated during the party, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant claims when she set up the balloons, everything looked great. It wasn’t until a week after the wedding that the plaintiff complained because five balloons didn’t float right. The defendant would have adjusted them if the plaintiff had said something in the first place. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff hired the defendant as an attorney to defend her son in court. Her son got into a fight and beat someone unconscious, which got him arrested and charged with attempted murder. The plaintiff doesn’t think the defendant was good at his job, so she’s suing for the cost of retainer. The defendant argues he had to dismiss himself from the case because the plaintiff refused to pay him. He’s countersuing for the balance of services. Then, the plaintiff rented the top floor of her home to her then-girlfriend’s daughter and son-in-law. After a month, she evicted the defendant. She claims her ex-girlfriend tried to kill herself in the plaintiff’s home and got drunk. The plaintiff claims the defendants left the place in a mess when they left, so she’s suing for rent and damages. The defendants argue the plaintiff tried to run over the ex-girlfriend and denied them access to the home. They say the plaintiff left their items outside in the rain when she kicked them out. They’re countersuing for rent and the cost of items that need replacing. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff met the defendant when he was interviewing her for a job. He says he took a nap on the defendant’s bed while the defendant ran some errands. The defendant’s phone broke when he was in her room, so he bought her a new one. He argues the defendant won’t pay him back, so he’s suing. The defendant doesn’t think she owes him because she didn’t break her phone. Plus, the plaintiff had a service contract for oil with the defendant’s company to clean her heater. She says she stopped using the defendant’s company because she found a less expensive product elsewhere. She says the defendant kept cleaning her heater and she tried to cancel the contract, but he refuses to refund her money. The defendant argues the customer is required to buy oil from his company, but she hadn’t in years, so he canceled her contract. Plus, the plaintiff hired the defendant and loaned him money to maintain his credit. He says the defendant never paid him back, so he’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff tried to steal his paycheck and he never borrowed money in the first place. He doesn’t think he owes anything. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff says her cousin, the defendant, stole her dog, so she’s suing. The defendant claims their aunt originally owned the dog and gave the pup to him when she could no longer care for him. Besides, the defendant argues that the plaintiff doesn’t have the necessary space to take care of a dog. Then, the defendant hired the plaintiff to make dresses for her wedding party. Unfortunately, the plaintiff claims she has yet to be paid, so she’s suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff didn’t deliver the dresses in time, so she owes nothing. In fact, the defendant says the dresses were so late that they missed out on using their limo rental, and the photographer couldn’t get photos of the defendant’s bridal party. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff, a hair salon owner, alleges the defendant bought the building she used and jacked up the rent. The plaintiff refused to sign a new lease and claims the defendant didn’t return the security deposit, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues that the plaintiff left without notice, and he doesn’t owe her a dime. The plaintiff claims the defendant got into an accident, and the car he hit careened into the plaintiff’s fence. The plaintiff is suing the defendant for the damages. The defendant says the accident wasn’t his fault, and therefore, he owes nothing. The plaintiff used to date the defendant. While they were together, the plaintiff says they once got into a fight, and the defendant stole money from his drawer, so he’s suing. The defendant admits she took the money, but she insists it’s because she felt threatened by the plaintiff and had to change her locks. The defendant is countersuing for lost wages. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff and defendant lived together. The plaintiff says the defendant’s cat attacked his feline, and his cat needed surgery. He’s suing for vet bills, Uber trips to and from the vet, and loss of work. The defendant argues the plaintiff has a hairless cat who already had an abscess on his back. No one witnessed the fight, so she doesn’t think she owes. The plaintiff bought a car from the defendant. He says they agreed on a monthly payment plan, but then she started demanding accelerated payments. Then, one day, she stole his car, so he’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff’s first check bounced, and she had to pay the bounce fee. She says she had a right to take the car back because the title was still in her name. The plaintiff says his neighbor’s tree fell on his car, which was a gift from his grandfather. He claims the defendant won’t pay, so he’s suing for the cost of car repairs. The defendant argues the car doesn’t even run and he isn’t sure the tree that fell onto his car was his. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff hired the defendant to do electrical work on his house after Hurricane Sandy. He claims the defendant’s worker did a terrible job, and now the lights don’t work. He had to pay another electrician, so he’s suing for damages and the cost of having to pay for another electrician to fix it. The defendant claims he gave the plaintiff a price for the job, but then he tried to get additional work for free. Then, the plaintiff used to be in a relationship with the defendant, and they have a child together. She claims the defendant broke her computer and now won’t pay her back, so she’s suing for the cost of the laptop. The defendant argues he broke the computer by accident. He says the plaintiff told him not to worry about it, but then her mom’s boyfriend got in the middle of it all, so now they’re in court. Plus, the plaintiff purchased a car from the defendant. He claims the engine was cracked, and now the car overheats. He’s suing for the cost of car repairs. The defendant agues he told the plaintiff to bring the car in, but he waited over a week to do it, so it’s not his responsibility. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff hired the defendant to put up decorations and props at her daughter’s Hollywood-themed Sweet 16 party. She says the defendant showed up late, so people had to wait in the lobby for the party to start. She’s suing for a partial refund. The defendant argues his workmen got stuck in traffic because of a marathon, but they still got everything done. He claims the party got started only 10 minutes late, and he offered her a credit for her next party, but she refused. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant, a painter, to do work around his house. He paid the defendant most of the money upfront, but he claims the workers did a terrible job and damaged his house. He’s suing for a refund. The defendant argues his workers did a great job and the plaintiff is impossible to please. He doesn’t think he owes the plaintiff a dime. Plus, the plaintiff contracted with the defendant to rent space for an event with 250 people. The plaintiff claims the defendant rented the venue to someone else just six days before the scheduled event, so he’s suing for breach of contract. The defendant argues the plaintiff didn’t pay and someone else offered him more money instead. He claims he did not even have a contract with the plaintiff to begin with. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff is suing his aunt and cousin. The plaintiff moved in with the defendants because he got kicked out of his house. He claims his aunt and cousin stole his clothes and won’t pay him back, so he’s suing. The defendants argue the plaintiff stole things from their home when he moved in. They eventually had to evict him and get a restraining order. They’re countersuing for attorney fees, stolen property, and car damages. Then, the plaintiff rented an apartment from the defendant. She says her daughter tripped on a pothole on the property and broke her arm. The plaintiff sued the management company, but then they canceled her lease. She’s suing for the balance on a security deposit. The defendant argues the plaintiff caused thousands of dollars in damage in their apartment. She’s countersuing for additional repairs. Plus, the plaintiff hired the defendant to install shades in her condo. She says she was watching television with her great-grandson one day and the shades came crashing down. She had to hire someone else to install new shades, so she’s suing for a reimbursement. The defendant thinks the plaintiff should blame the people who installed her window frames, not him. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff hired the defendant to fix his roof and install a new one. He claims the defendant subcontracted out to people who had no idea what they were doing, and it came out terribly. It didn’t even pass a home inspection. He’s suing for the cost to repair the roof. The defendant argues he did a great job and even gave the plaintiff a good deal. Then, the plaintiff bought a motorcycle from the defendant. He says there was a broken chain that he thinks the defendant glued back together. The motorcycle started dripping oil and the engine had issues, which he claims the defendant hid from him. He’s suing for the cost of a bike repair estimate. The defendant argues the bike sat around for several years before he sold it. He says he doesn’t know what the plaintiff did with the bike between the time he bought it and sued him. Plus, the plaintiff crashed into the defendant after he made a left turn when the plaintiff was going straight and had the right of way. She hit the defendant, who then crashed into another vehicle. The plaintiff says the defendant didn’t have enough on his insurance policy so pay her, so she’s suing for what she’s owed. The defendant argues the plaintiff was speeding when she crashed into him. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff brought his car to the defendant’s shop because it overheated. He says the car overheated minutes after the defendant claimed he fixed it. It overheated a third time, then got it towed to a different mechanic, who said the thermostat was installed backwards. He’s suing for additional car repairs. The defendant argues he never would have installed the device backwards. Then, the plaintiff purchased a car from the defendant. He wants his money because he claims the vehicle broke down the day after he bought it. He’s suing for the deposit he put down. The defendant argues the plaintiff can’t just return the car as he pleases. Plus, it’s not his fault the plaintiff’s mom and girlfriend didn’t like the car. He’s countersuing for the balance on the deposit and loss of business. Plus, the plaintiff and defendant had been friends for 30 years, but the lawsuit ruined it. He brought his car to the defendant because his friend offered to fix the plaintiff’s truck transmission. The plaintiff says he got his car back five years later, and the car isn’t even in good condition. He’s suing for the cost of repairs. The defendant doesn’t think he owes. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff sold a puppy to the defendant, her friend’s sister. She says the defendant never paid for the dog, so she took the dog back. The defendant put up fliers around the neighborhood claiming the plaintiff stole her dog. She’s suing for the cost of the dog and defamation of character. The defendant argues the plaintiff stole her dog and keeps moving the pet around so she can’t find it. The defendant is countersuing for the cost of the dog. Then, the plaintiff was hired to do marketing for the defendant’s cookie company. He says the defendant refuses to pay him for his services, so he’s suing for two months of salary. The defendant fired him, so he doesn’t owe the plaintiff. Plus, the plaintiff brings her ex-boyfriend to court. She argues the defendant never paid rent when they lived together, stole money from her, and even took cash out of her bank account. He hasn’t paid her back, so she’s suing for rent, stolen money, and bank overdraft charges. The defendant says he never even lived with her, and the defendant is just upset because their relationship went bad. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff rented an apartment from the defendant, her landlord. She claims the defendant locked her out of her home one day and left all of her belongings outside, including her television and hair kit. She’s suing for damages. The defendant argues the plaintiff never paid rent and doesn’t know what happened to her belongings. She’s countersuing for unpaid rent, slander, and harassment. Then, the plaintiffs, a father and daughter, hired the defendant to make the daughter’s prom dress. They say the back seam broke, which caused a huge hole. When she got to the prom, the front seam broke. The plaintiffs are suing for the cost of the dress. The defendant argues the daughter didn’t put on the dress until the day of the prom. He doesn’t understand why the plaintiffs are suing for double the cost of the dress. Plus, the plaintiff let her son drive her car to drop off a friend at his house. He says the defendant ran into his car because she was speeding, and both cars got totaled. The plaintiff says the defendant refuses to pay for damages, so she’s suing. The defendant argues her cellphone slid off her dashboard and under her brake pad. She tried to reach for it while driving, then crashed into the plaintiff’s son. She says insurance already covered the damages. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff brings his ex-girlfriend to court. He argues they got into a big fight at a party, and the defendant started beating his car with a stick. The defendant called the police and claimed he beat her, so he got arrested. He’s suing for bail, wrongful arrest, missing work, and car damages. The defendant says the plaintiff attacked her. She admits she hit the plaintiff’s car with a stick, but the damages aren’t as bad as he claims. Then, the plaintiff used to be close friends with the defendant. She says she loaned him money to help pay for child support backpay, but he hasn’t repaid her, so she’s suing. The defendant argues they were actually dating at the time. He says he already paid her back in full, so he isn’t sure why he’s even in court. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff used to be close friends with the defendant. They decided to take a trip to the Dominican Republic together and the plaintiff paid for the whole trip with the agreement that the defendant would repay her share. She claims the defendant refuses to pay because they got into a fight during the vacation, so she’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff insisted on booking everything even though she offered to pay. She says the hotel was horrible and not even close to the beach, so she doesn’t owe. Then, the plaintiff was walking her small dog when she claims the defendant’s unleashed dog attached her pet. She’s suing for vet bills. The defendant says the plaintiff was walking her dog on her property and she’s the one who didn’t have her dog on a leash. There wasn’t even any blood or sign of a fight, so she doesn’t owe her anything. Plus, the plaintiff purchased a car from the defendant. She claims he sold her a faulty car because the check engine light went on the next day, so she’s suing for her money back. The defendant argues the plaintiff test drove the car and liked it, so he doesn’t owe her. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff has managed hundreds of rappers and agreed to represent the defendant’s son. He says he hasn’t been paid and is out tens of thousands of dollars, so he’s suing. The defendant says her son is very talented. She says she and the plaintiff agreed on a return on the profit, but she hasn’t received a dime. The defendant argues the plaintiff will get paid once she gets paid. She’s countersuing for jewelry and the cost of a laptop. Case #27153 #PeoplesCourt #RealityTV #Court Then, the plaintiff is a professional walker and tripped over the defendant’s sidewalk because it was uneven. He thinks the defendant is responsible for the sidewalk outside of his house. He’s suing for pain and suffering and punitive damages. The defendant argues the plaintiff just tripped and is trying to pin it on him. Plus, the plaintiff, who has a disabled son, agreed to rent an apartment from the defendant. She argues the defendant told her she couldn’t move in due to her son, so she’s suing for a security deposit and bounced check fee. The defendant says the plaintiff was the one who changed her mind, so he doesn’t owe her a thing. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff leased her horse to the defendant for free in exchange for feeding and taking care of the horse. The plaintiff claims the defendant took terrible care of the horse and left him malnourished, so she rescued him. She’s suing for vet bills. The defendant argues she and her husband split up, so she wasn’t able to contact the plaintiff. She thinks her ex is behind the whole thing. Then, the plaintiff took his car to the defendant’s shop for an oil change, but when he got it back, the engine was messed up. He claims the defendant’s worker broke the gas detection pump, and it was very expensive to fix. He’s suing for car damages. The defendant argues the car has 200,000 miles on it, so obviously it was going to have issues. Plus, the plaintiff rented an apartment to the defendant for three years. He claims the defendant up and left in the middle of the night and left the place in a total mess. He’s suing for the cleaning costs. The defendant argues he left the place perfectly clean. He says he was on a month-to-month lease and the apartment was infested with pests, so he doesn’t owe. He’s countersuing for money owed. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff says the defendant is his estranged son. He co-signed on a car for him, but his son isn’t making the payments. Suing his own flesh and blood is tough, but his son needs a lesson in responsibility. The defendant insists his dad is a bully who kept the car himself, and he denies owing him a penny. Then, the plaintiff says he hired the defendant, a health care worker, to care for his 95-year-old disabled mother. The defendant failed to show up twice for overnight shifts and he had to miss work and travel to take of his mom. He’s suing for all he’s out. The defendant says the plaintiff had cameras everywhere to spy on health care workers and she didn’t want anything to do with him. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff says he’s known the defendant for a few years and loaned her money off and on. She hasn’t repaid the most recent loan, and he claims it’s because she has the hots for him and wants to keep him interested. He’s suing to get his money back. The defendant says the plaintiff did a poor job on renovating her bathroom, so she says they’re even financially. Then, the plaintiff says the defendant’s dog attacked her pet at the dog park. She claims the defendant thinks it was no big deal, even though her dog needed surgery. She’s suing him for all the vet bills. The defendant says the dog was only scratched, and her dog was actually injured elsewhere. He insists her dog was off-leash when she entered the park, which is a no-no. Plus, the plaintiff says she bought a new TV from the defendant, but his employee carried it to her car upside down and it ended up with a puncture mark. The defendant won’t replace the TV or give her a refund, so she’s suing for his money back. The defendant says he asked the plaintiff to inspect the TV before she bought it, but she refused, so he’s not responsible. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff hired the defendant to remove snow and make home repairs. She says she prepaid him, but he never showed up. She’s suing for the balance on two retainers. The defendant argues he removed the snow and fixed her appliances, so he doesn’t owe her anything. Then, the plaintiff brought his car to the defendant’s shop for a paint job, but the workers completely ruined it. He’s suing for the cost of car repairs. The defendant argues the plaintiff paid him and didn’t complain when he picked it up. He thinks the plaintiff is a scammer. Plus, the plaintiff rented apartment from the defendant, but it was a total mess and the neighbors were terrible. She gave notice to move out, but now the defendant won’t return her security deposit. The defendant says the plaintiff complained about everything, and he doesn’t owe her. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff used to be friends with the defendant. He says the defendant hired him to be a cinematographer for a short comedy special. The plaintiff claims the defendant didn’t pay him for the work he did, so he’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff volunteered to work on the special. She says she agreed to give him food, but not money, so she doesn’t owe him a thing. Then, the plaintiff was hired to paint the defendant’s apartment. He says he left his tools in her apartment overnight, and when he returned, his tools were ruined because the defendant’s dogs ate them. He’s suing for the cost of a new paint gun. The defendant argues she told the plaintiff not to leave his tools in her apartment, but he didn’t listen, so it’s not her fault. Plus, the plaintiff dated the defendant and loaned him money twice during their relationship. She claims he never paid her back, so she’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff cheated on him all the time. He says the plaintiff never bothered him about the money until now. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff hired the defendant to airbrush a specific mural on his Corvette. He claims the defendant made tons of mistakes and now he hates it, so he’s suing for damages. The defendant argues he has a great reputation and the plaintiff was too nitpicky. He’s countersuing for harassment. The plaintiff hired the defendant to fix her roof because it had a leak. She claims the leak never went away even after he fixed it twice, and the third time he was supposed to come, he didn’t show up. She’s suing for the cost of a roof. The defendant argues he went to the plaintiff’s house multiple times to fix the roof, but she was never there. Plus, she hired a new roofer and that voids his warranty, so he doesn’t owe her a thing. The plaintiff’s daughter rented an apartment with the defendant. She claims it was a bug-infested unit, so the daughter moved out. She says the defendant won’t return the security deposit, so she’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff’s daughter left after two weeks, so she left the defendant without a roommate. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff rented a room in the defendant’s house and says he didn’t get along with the defendant and the other roommate. He claims the defendant eventually locked him out of the house, so was forced to move out. He’s suing for prepaid rent. The defendant argues the plaintiff left behind a huge mess, so he doesn’t think he owes anything. He’s countersuing for loss of time and a cleaning fee. Then, the plaintiff is a professional baker. She hired the defendant the fix a mixer after it burned out, but she claims the defendant only made things worse. She’s suing for the cost of the mixer and lost wages. The defendant argues the mixer is 30 years old. He says he took the mixer apart and ordered the parts, but she moved it and parts went missing. Plus, the plaintiff purchased a used car from the defendant. She claims the vehicle is mess and it was totaled in an accident previously. She’s suing for the cost of car repairs. The defendant argues he financed the car several years before she brought him to court, so he doesn’t owe her anything. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff was hired to drive a truck for the defendant but hasn’t been paid yet, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant claims during the first delivery, the plaintiff damaged the goods, and during the second job, he disappeared on the road for three days. The defendant insists he lost money because of the plaintiff, so he shouldn’t have to pay him. Then, the plaintiff rented an apartment owned by the defendant, but when he moved in, there were items left behind from the former tenant. The plaintiff claims he asked the defendant to remove the belongings, but he refused, so the plaintiff is suing for storage fees. The defendant says he tried to remove the washer and dryer left behind, but the plaintiff would never give him access to get them out, so the defendant denies owing anything. Plus, the plaintiff brought his car into the defendant’s repair shop but claims the defendant caused problems and made it worse, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant says the plaintiff self-diagnosed the car’s problems, and he fixed everything he was hired to do, so the defendant denies owing anything. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff was competing in an adult league soccer match when he says the defendant ran into him at full speed to intentionally hurt him, so the plaintiff is suing for medical bills. The defendant insists he did not injure the plaintiff on purpose, and he was just passionate about the game. The defendant is countersuing for malicious prosecution and abuse of civil procedures. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant to monogram his dress shirts with his initials on the cuffs. However, when the plaintiff picked them up, he says the monograms were plastered on the front of the shirts instead, so he’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff never explained that he wanted the monograms on the cuffs, so he denies owing anything. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff brings his estranged wife to court. He says she got a restraining order against him, and when he went back to their house, she removed his property, so he’s suing. The defendant argues she left the plaintiff because he strangled her. She says she removed her own property and not his, so she doesn’t think she owes him. Then, the plaintiff rented an apartment to the defendant. She says she had to start evicting the defendant and she damaged it, so she’s suing for roof repairs, floor repairs, and inspection costs. The defendant argues she didn’t damage a thing and the plaintiff was just jealous of her. She’s suing for lost catering jobs and harassment. Plus, the plaintiff moved to the United States from England to take care of her sick uncle. She bought a used car from the defendant but claims it was a lemon. She thinks he’s taking advantage of her, so she’s suing for a refund. The defendant argues he swapped out the first car, and she just can’t be satisfied. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The defendant brings her son’s girlfriend to court. She let the defendant live in her home but argues she stopped paying rent after she lost her job. She’s suing for rent, party supplies, babysitting costs, and gas. The defendant says the plaintiff caused her stress and doesn’t want to talk to her after this case. She’s countersuing for emotional distress and aggravation. Then, the plaintiffs hired the defendant to take photos and videos at their wedding. They claim the defendant partied the whole night instead and they didn’t even get to choose the pictures that went into the album. They’re suing for a partial refund. The defendant argues the plaintiffs loved the album. Plus, the plaintiff purchased a car from the defendant. He claims the defendant told him the car was in good condition, but it ended up being a piece of junk. He’s suing for his money. The defendant argues the plaintiff knew the car needed work and he was upfront about that. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff and defendant dated on and off for the past five years but still live together. The plaintiff says the defendant owes him for five months of rent, so he’s suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff once threatened her with a hammer, and she called the police. The defendant insists she’s been actively trying to move out and find a safe place to live, so she denies owing a dime. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant to find her a housekeeper, but she claims the woman failed to find her a person she liked, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant insists she found the plaintiff a housekeeper she initially approved of. However, after two months, the defendant says the plaintiff wanted someone new. Per their contract, the defendant agreed to find another housekeeper, but she says the plaintiff decided to file this frivolous lawsuit instead. Plus, the plaintiff was driving when the defendant sideswiped his car, so the plaintiff is suing for damages. The defendant insists the plaintiff abruptly changed lanes without looking, and he’s the one who sideswiped her. In fact, the defendant says the plaintiff’s insurance already admitted he was at fault. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff loaned the defendant money to bail him out of jail and help him purchase an engagement ring. However, the plaintiff says the defendant won’t pay him back, so he is suing. The defendant insists he never asked for the money, and he believes the plaintiff only gave him the loan because he has a weird obsession with his girlfriend. Then, the plaintiff loaned his stepdaughter money for a new transmission for her car. The plaintiff claims his stepdaughter agreed to pay him back but went on vacation to Hawaii instead, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant admits she didn’t pay back the loan in full, but that’s because the plaintiff added on illegal late fees. Plus, the plaintiff purchased a car from the defendant, but when he went to put gas in the vehicle, the plaintiff noticed there was a hole in the tank. The plaintiff brought the car into a shop, and they told him it was unsafe to drive, so the plaintiff is suing the seller for a refund. The defendant, a certified mechanic, insists the plaintiff knew what he was getting when he purchased the 17-year-old vehicle, and he denies owing anything. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff made a deal with the defendant where if she cleaned his apartment, cooked for him, and spent time with him, he’d buy her a cell phone. He’s suing for the cost of a phone and screen protector. The defendant argues the plaintiff bought her the phone for her birthday. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant to direct and edit a PSA on the dangers of drugs. She claims the defendant returned a terrible video that she wasn’t happy with, so she’s suing for a refund. The defendant argues he did the work that he was paid to do, and the plaintiff told him everything looked fine. Plus, the plaintiff rented an apartment to the defendant, who signed a one-year lease. She says the defendant claimed the apartment caused her health problems, then she disappeared after two months. She’s suing for lost rent. The defendant argues she and her son were sick the entire time they lived in the plaintiff’s apartment. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff rented a room in the defendant’s apartment. She claims the defendant made fun of her and even threatened to shoot her, so she’s suing for a rent refund. The defendant argues the plaintiff didn’t move out when she was supposed to. Then, the plaintiff got arrested and asked the defendant to bail her out. She gave the defendant her bank card and PIN, but she claims the defendant stole the money, so she’s suing. The defendant argues she gave the money to the jail, and she doesn’t owe the plaintiff anything. Plus, the plaintiff hired the defendant to fix his dryer but says it still didn’t work even after the defendant showed up. He tried to fix the problem himself. The plaintiff hired another company, who told him he had a completely different dryer problem. He’s suing for services because of the misdiagnosis. The defendant argues he offered to return half the service fee, but the plaintiff refused. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff hired and paid the defendant to install copper pipes in front of his home. On the day the work was to start, the plaintiff says the defendant sent three guys who dug and filled a hole in the wrong area of his yard. The defendant then told the plaintiff he didn’t need the pipes, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant claims the plaintiff just paid him a deposit, and even though there was no need for copper pipes, his men still performed work. Then, the plaintiff claims his college buddy crashed his motorcycle, so he’s suing for damages. The defendant insists the plaintiff was selling the motorcycle and pressured him into taking a test drive, so he denies owing a dime. Plus, the plaintiff loaned his former friends, the defendants, money to get out of jail. However, the plaintiff claims they wrote him a check to pay back the loan, but it bounced, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendants thought the plaintiff was giving them the money out of the goodness of his heart and are hurt the plaintiff filed this lawsuit. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The defendant booked the plaintiff’s U2 cover band for an event. However, the plaintiff claims the defendant tried canceling the gig two weeks before the performance date, so the plaintiff is suing for the balance due on his contract. The defendant says someone told him the plaintiff was racist and sent him screenshots of “despicable” things the plaintiff wrote on Twitter, so the defendant believes he rightfully terminated the contract. Then, the plaintiff brought her phone into the defendant’s shop for repairs, but when she picked it up, it was still broken. The plaintiff claims she brought it back a second time, and when she tried to pick it up, the defendant told her it was gone, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists he fixed the plaintiff’s phone the second time around, called her to pick it up, but the plaintiff never showed up. The defendant says he waited over 60 days, and his policy is clear: Merchandise left over 60 days is considered abandoned. Plus, the plaintiff brought his vehicle to the defendant’s shop on four different occasions for four different repairs. Unfortunately, his vehicle was still having issues, so he brought it to his local car dealer. The plaintiff claims the dealer said there had been no repairs, so the plaintiff is suing the defendant for all the money he paid him. The defendant insists the Nissan dealer lied, and he did the proper work he was hired to do. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff met the defendant on the bus, took her out to dinner, and they became friends. The plaintiff ended up loaning the defendant money for various things, but he hasn’t been paid back, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant admits the plaintiff bought her a few things and gave her money, but she insists the loans were a gift. The defendant believes the plaintiff is just suing her out of spite because he has romantic feelings for her, but she doesn’t feel the same. Then, the plaintiff owns a landscaping company and says he serviced two of the defendant’s properties, but she stopped paying him, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff didn’t come to her house for three weeks in a row, but he charged her just the same. The defendant eventually sent the plaintiff a note to terminate the job, and she believes she doesn’t owe him a dime. Plus, the plaintiff claims the defendant shot across two lanes to make a left turn and slammed into his car, so the plaintiff is suing for damages. The defendant insists the plaintiff sideswiped him, and he’s the one who was hit. If anyone’s owed money, the defendant believes it’s him. The defendant is countersuing for an insurance deductible. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff hired and paid the defendant to install a dishwasher and a hot water tank, but she claims the defendant did half the work and disappeared, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant, a recovering addict, says he asked the plaintiff to stop smoking weed and drinking while he was working, so the defendant left. The defendant is countersuing for harassment, slander, and false claims. Then, the plaintiffs rented an apartment from the defendant, but he won’t return their security deposit they say is rightfully owed, so the plaintiffs are suing. The defendant claims the plaintiffs cracked the bathroom sink and ruined the floors and walls, so he has every right to withhold the plaintiffs’ security deposit. Plus, the plaintiff purchased a car from the defendant. When he brought it home, the plaintiff says the check engine light turned on, so he asked the defendant to repair it for free like he agreed to do. However, the plaintiff says the defendant refused to fix the car, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff got a 50/50 warranty, so he is supposed to pay for half the repairs. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff used to be friends with the defendant and loaned her money to help pay for rent. She says the defendant refuses to pay her back, so she’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff has a crush on her and never told her she needed to pay the plaintiff back. Then, the plaintiff claims her neighbor’s pit bull attacked her small terrier and almost killed him. The dog almost died, so she’s suing for the cost of vet bills. The defendant argues the woman who lives in the apartment below him owns the pit bull, not him, so he doesn’t think he owes. Plus, the plaintiff and her boyfriend rented an apartment from the defendants. She had to move out quickly and says the defendants won’t return her security deposit. She’s suing for moving costs and her security deposit. The defendant argues the plaintiff damaged the apartment, which is why they won’t return the deposit. They’re suing for back rent and repairs. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff was friends with the defendant for almost 40 years. He says he bought four cars for the defendant, but she kept crashing them. He’s suing for the balance of car loans, storage fees, and harassment. The defendant argues she has been paying the plaintiff back. Then, the plaintiff rented a house from the defendant and claims it was a mouse-infested mess. She hired exterminators to get rid of the problem, but the landlord never paid her back. She’s suing for the security deposit, moving costs, extermination costs, and storage fees. The defendant argues the plaintiff’s husband broke a fuel pipe and she stopped paying, so he needed to evict her. He’s countersuing for additional rent. Plus, the plaintiff brings his son’s ex-girlfriend to court. He claims she took his vehicle without permission and crashed into the car when she was rubbernecking. He’s suing for damages. The defendant argues she only “tapped” the car in front of her when she was going slowly, and this whole thing only became a big deal after they broke up. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff says the defendant is the girlfriend of her current partner’s ex-husband. She says the woman is stirring up trouble by making false allegations about her behavior with her partner’s kids. She’s suing for all she’s out because she had to hire a lawyer. The defendant says the plaintiff is aggressive and abusive, and she’s countersuing for mental anguish and lost wages. Then, the plaintiff says he was married to the defendant and she co-signed on a truck for him. He claims that once they were headed for divorce, the defendant stole the truck from him after he served her with spousal support papers, so she’s suing. The defendant says the plaintiff is a cheating scoundrel who missed a truck payment, so her lawyer advised her to repossess it. She’s countersuing for a cell phone bill. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff says she was in her parked car at the grocery store when the careless defendant’s shopping cart crashed into her door and damaged it. She’s suing for the cost of repairs. The defendant says it was a snowy, windy day, and the wind blew it toward the plaintiff’s car. She claims she owes nothing. Then, the plaintiff says she’s known the defendant for years and hired him to lay down fresh sod in her yard. Instead, he put in half-dead brown sod, so she’s suing for the shoddy job, and punitive and emotional damages. The defendant says the plaintiff didn’t give the sod time to grow in, and he won’t return any money. Plus, the plaintiff says he and the defendant were close friends and former roommates. He claims his former friend owes him money for rent, damages, a bail bond, and airline tickets, so he’s suing. The defendant says the let the plaintiff live with him rent-free, so they’re square. He’s countersuing for four months of rent. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff says the defendant, his ex-wife, took money out of his retirement account to pay for a new pool liner, so he’s suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff agreed to pay for the pool liner, and he never asked her to pay him back until recently. Besides, the defendant says the plaintiff owes her money because she paid for their kitchen remodel, and she’s countersuing for appliances and pool maintenance. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant to install a water filtration system in his house, and it guarantees odor-free water. However, the plaintiff says three weeks after the installation, there was a strong sulfur smell, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant claims the plaintiff’s water heater needs repair, not the water filtration system. Plus, the plaintiff claims the defendant drove his 18-wheeler into her car and should have his license taken away. When the plaintiff brought her car to the defendant’s repair shop, she says they did a horrible job and made it worse, so she’s suing him for the damages. The defendant alleges the plaintiff was the one who caused the accident, and her car was already in poor condition before the crash. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff rented a house from the defendants, and she claims they vandalized her pontoon boat out of spite. The plaintiff says she also suffered from mold poisoning, so she’s suing for a refund on rent. The defendants insist the plaintiff caused the mold problem due to her messy demeanor, and they say her pontoon boat was already falling apart. Then, the plaintiff put down a deposit for a car at the defendant’s dealership. When the plaintiff asked for the deposit back, the defendant refused, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says the plaintiff had to wait for his employer to verify his employment on the credit application, and when that happened, he wanted his deposit back. The defendant put in a lot of time and work for the plaintiff, and she feels she is entitled to his deposit. Plus, the plaintiff rented an apartment from the defendant. He claims the defendant illegally locked the plaintiff out and threw away his belongings, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant denies owing the plaintiff a dime because he says the plaintiff didn’t clear out the apartment on the eviction date, and he left the place a mess. The defendant is countersuing for cleaning costs, repairs, and appliances. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff says he hired the defendant to mix and master four songs, but he’s still waiting for them. He’s suing the defendant for a refund since nothing was ever done. The defendant says the plaintiff only asked for one song, which he delivered. He insists he would have charged far more for four songs. Then, the plaintiff says she and her boyfriend moved to New York City and rented an apartment from the defendant, but the woman lied about the condition of the place. They say there was no heat, the water was yellow, and the defendant tried to record them. They’re suing for the return of their security deposit. The defendant says the neighbors complained about the plaintiffs because they smoked pot and their dog scratched the door. They also disconnected the outdoor security cameras. She’s countersuing for repairs and unpaid rent. The plaintiff says he worked as a roofer for the defendant’s company, but he’s getting stiffed on some of his pay. He worked hard for it, so he’s suing for what he’s due. The defendant says the plaintiff showed up early and wants to be paid for hours he wasn’t scheduled. He insists the plaintiff was paid in full. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff hired and paid the defendant to re-tile her apartment floor and kitchen walls. The defendant told the plaintiff he would complete the job in a week, but the job still isn’t done after two months, and the plaintiff’s apartment is a mess, so she is suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff added more tasks to the job and that’s why it isn’t completed yet. Additionally, the defendant alleges that the plaintiff sent him sexually explicit videos, and after he rebuffed her, the defendant believes the plaintiff is retaliating with this lawsuit. Then, the plaintiffs say they went to retrieve their car from church one day, and it was missing because the defendant illegally towed their car from a spot they had every right to park in. The plaintiffs are suing for the tow fee they paid. The defendant insists he had every right to tow the car because the plaintiffs didn’t have the proper permit, and his manager signed off on the tow. Plus, the plaintiff rented an apartment from the defendant and was ordered to leave because she was a little behind on rent. When the plaintiff went back to retrieve her grandbaby’s crib and refrigerator, she claims the defendant locked her out. The plaintiff says her landlord never explained why he withheld the plaintiff’s security deposit, so she’s suing. The defendant insists he sent a detailed letter explaining that the security deposit was being applied to her unpaid rent, so he denies owing anything. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff says the defendant was her landlord, and when she moved out, she says the defendant locked her out before she could retrieve her bedroom set. The plaintiff believes the defendant wasn’t in the right, and she’s suing him for the cost of the bedroom set as well as harassment. The defendant claims he had to have the plaintiff evicted, and she still owes back rent. Then, the plaintiff worked for the defendant when he ran a youth basketball summer camp. The plaintiff claims she provided her own money so the defendant could rent a van for the summer camp, but he hasn’t paid her back, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says the money the plaintiff spent on the van isn’t his responsibility because she volunteered to help the kids. Plus, the plaintiff hired the defendant to install purple LED lights in her vehicle for a car show, but she claims the defendant didn’t know what he was doing and used duct tape to secure the lights in place. The plaintiff can’t show the vehicle in shows anymore and is suing for refund. The defendant alleges he doesn’t owe the plaintiff a penny because she didn’t pay him in full, and he did such a good job that she won second place in the car show. The defendant is countersuing for unpaid lights, lost wages, and time Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The plaintiff hired the defendant to take pictures at her wedding. However, the plaintiff says the photos were delivered two months late, and she wasn’t happy with the result, so she’s suing. The defendant claims she shot for 10 hours in three different locations, and she believes the plaintiff is just looking to get free pictures. Then, the plaintiff rented an apartment from the defendant. She alleges the defendant went into her home when she wasn’t there and stole her belongings, so the plaintiff suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff caused a fire, and when she was put up in a hotel, her belongings were stolen by someone else. The defendant believes the plaintiff is suing him as retaliation because he’s evicting her. Plus, the plaintiff claims the defendant got into a car crash, ran into a fence, and knocked it over. The fence fell on the plaintiff’s parked car, destroying it, so the plaintiff is suing for the damages. The defendant alleges his gas pedal got stuck in place, and he’s just lucky to be alive. The defendant believes the plaintiff is an opportunist trying to rip him off. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices