
Episode 196 - Occupational Safety - Accident or Incident Investigation?
The Occupational Safety Leadership Podcast
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (mcdn.podbean.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
Dr. Ayers explains why safety professionals should stop using the word “accident” and instead use “incident.” The episode emphasizes that language shapes mindset — and calling something an “accident” implies randomness and inevitability, which undermines prevention.
🧠 Key Themes 1. “Accident” Suggests Unavoidable EventsDr. Ayers highlights that the word accident carries assumptions:
-
It sounds random
-
It implies no one could have prevented it
-
It reduces accountability for learning
This mindset blocks improvement. Sources:
2. “Incident” Supports a Prevention MindsetUsing incident instead:
-
Keeps the focus on causes
-
Reinforces that events are preventable
-
Encourages investigation
-
Promotes learning and improvement
Language influences culture. Sources:
3. Investigations Should Be Consistent Regardless of SeverityWhether something is:
-
A near miss
-
A minor injury
-
A major event
…organizations should still investigate with the same mindset: What can we learn so this doesn’t happen again?
4. The Goal Is Understanding, Not BlameDr. Ayers reinforces that investigations must:
-
Stay objective
-
Focus on systems
-
Avoid fault‑finding
-
Identify meaningful corrective actions
The terminology we choose sets the tone for this process.
🚀 Leadership Takeaways-
Words matter — “incident” supports prevention; “accident” undermines it.
-
Every event is an opportunity to learn.
-
Consistent investigation practices strengthen safety culture.
-
The goal is understanding and prevention, not blame.