S8 Ep972: Richard Epstein disputes the "plain meaning" application to the 14th Amendment, arguing that "subject to the jurisdiction" requires natural allegiance rather than mere physical presence. Critiquing the Wong Kim Ark ruling, he suggests that children of leg

June 6, 20268m 51s

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (dts.podtrac.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

← All episodes of The John Batchelor Show

S8 Ep972: Richard Epstein disputes the &quot;plain meaning&quot; application to the 14th Amendment, arguing that &quot;subject to the jurisdiction&quot; requires natural allegiance rather than mere physical presence. Critiquing the Wong Kim Ark ruling, he suggests that children of leg

S8 Ep972: Richard Epstein disputes the "plain meaning" application to the 14th Amendment, arguing that "subject to the jurisdiction" requires natural allegiance rather than mere physical presence. Critiquing the Wong Kim Ark ruling, he suggests that children of leg