Oral Argument Re-Listen: Chiles v. Salazar | Can States Ban Therapists from Discussing Conversion Therapy?
The High Court Report · SCOTUS Oral Arguments
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (episodes.captivate.fm) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
Oral Argument Re-Listen: Chiles v. Salazar | Can States Ban Therapists from Discussing Conversion Therapy?
Link to Docket: Here
Case Preview: Here
Question Presented: Whether a law that censors certain conversations between counselors and their clients based on the viewpoints expressed regulates conduct or violates the Free Speech Clause. In plain English, this case asks: Can states ban therapists from discussing conversion therapy?
Oral Advocates:
- For Petitioner: James A. Campbell, Lansdowne, Va.
- For United States as Amicus Curiae: Hashim M. Mooppan, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
- For Respondent: Shannon W. Stevenson, Colorado Solicitor General
Timestamps:
[00:00:00] Case Preview
[00:00:50] Argument Begins
[00:00:57] Petitioner Opening Statement
[00:02:46] Petitioner Free for All Questions
[00:17:59] Petitioner Sequential Questions
[00:27:48] United States Opening Statement
[00:35:27] United States Sequential Questions
[00:45:41] Respondent Opening Statement
[01:09:00] Respondent Sequential Questions
[01:22:28] Petitioner Rebuttal