PLAY PODCASTS
Oral Argument: Ellingburg v. United States | Case No. 24-482 | Oral Argument Date: 10/14/25
Season 2025 · Episode 18

Oral Argument: Ellingburg v. United States | Case No. 24-482 | Oral Argument Date: 10/14/25

The High Court Report · SCOTUS Oral Arguments

October 14, 20251h 4m

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (episodes.captivate.fm) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

Oral Argument: Ellingburg v. United States | Case No. 24-482 | Oral Argument Date: 10/14/25

Link to Docket: Here

Case Preview: Here

Question Presented: Whether criminal restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA) is penal for purposes of the Ex Post Facto Clause.

Oral Advocates:

  1. For Petitioner: Amy M. Saharia, Washington, D.C. argued for petitioner.
  2. For Respondent in Support of Vacatur: Ashley Robertson, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice argued for respondent in support of vacatur.
  3. For Court-Appointed Amicus Curiae in Support of Judgment Below: John F. Bash, Austin, Texas.

Link to Opinion: TBD.

Website Link to Opinion Summary: TBD.

Website Link to Oral Argument: TBD.

Timestamps:

[00:00:00] Argument Preview

[00:00:58] Argument Begins

[00:01:06] Petitioner Opening Statement

[00:03:14] Petitioner Free for All Questions

[00:14:04] Petitioner Sequential Questions

[00:18:36] Respondent in Support of Vacatur Opening Statement

[00:19:45] Respondent in Support of Vacatur Free for All Questions

[00:33:22] Respondent in Support of Vacatur Sequential Questions

[00:34:41] For Court-Appointed Amicus Curiae in Support of Judgment Below Opening Statement

[00:37:03] For Court-Appointed Amicus Curiae in Support of Judgment Below Free for All Questions

[01:01:03] For Court-Appointed Amicus Curiae in Support of Judgment Below Sequential Questions

[01:02:09] Petitioner Rebuttal