The Doctor's Lounge

Send us a textShow Link: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/0003-4819-153-8-201010190-00274Why Listen 👥In this episode, the hosts delve into the complexities of the healthcare system, discussing the impact of large hospital systems as major employers, the broken window fallacy in healthcare, and the challenges of high premiums. They explore the historical context of certificate of need laws and site of service differentials, and how these contribute to rising healthcare costs. The conversation also touches on the role of government intervention, the influence of large health systems, and the potential for free market solutions.Co-HostsDutch Rojas – Founder, Bliksem HealthAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentatorEpisode Overview 📌The episode covers the economic myths in healthcare, the influence of large health systems, and the potential for free market solutions. It also discusses the historical context of certificate of need laws and site of service differentials.Notable Quotes 💬"Healthcare systems as major employers can be problematic.""The broken window fallacy applies to healthcare economics.""High premiums are linked to market consolidation and subsidies."What You’ll Learn 📚The impact of large hospital systems as major employers.The role of certificate of need laws in healthcare costs.How site of service differentials affect healthcare pricing.The influence of government intervention in healthcare.Potential free market solutions to healthcare challenges.The Episode (Timestamps) ⏱00:00:00 Introduction to Healthcare Economics00:03:00 The Role of Hospital Systems00:09:00 Understanding High Premiums00:15:00 Certificate of Need Laws00:21:00 Site of Service Differentials00:27:00 Government Intervention in Healthcare00:33:00 Free Market Solutions🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a textWhy Listen 👥In this episode, the hosts delve into the complexities of healthcare costs, the impact of policy decisions, and the role of market forces in shaping the healthcare landscape. They discuss the consolidation of healthcare providers, the influence of insurance companies, and the challenges faced by independent practices. The conversation also touches on the COVID-19 pandemic, the response of public health officials, and the lessons learned from the crisis.Co-HostsDutch Rojas – Founder, Bliksem HealthAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentatorDan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voiceEpisode Overview 📌The episode explores the doubling of healthcare premiums since 2010, the consolidation of healthcare providers, and the significant market power held by insurance companies. The hosts discuss the challenges faced by independent practices and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on public health responses. They also highlight the potential of direct contracting in healthcare and scrutinize the role of pharmacy benefit managers.Notable Quotes 💬"Healthcare premiums have doubled since 2010.""Consolidation is driving up healthcare costs.""Insurance companies hold the power in healthcare.""Independent practices are struggling to survive.""COVID-19 exposed public health weaknesses."What You’ll Learn 📚The systemic issues leading to rising healthcare premiums.How consolidation affects healthcare costs and dynamics.The challenges faced by independent practices in a consolidated market.The role of natural and vaccine immunity in pandemic management.The potential of direct contracting to reduce healthcare costs.The Episode (Timestamps) ⏱00:00:00 Introduction and Episode Overview00:03:00 Healthcare Costs and Consolidation00:09:00 Insurance Companies and Market Power00:15:00 Independent Practices and Policy Challenges00:21:00 COVID-19 Pandemic and Public Health Response00:27:00 Lessons Learned and Future Directions🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a text📌 Why ListenExplore the complexities of the 340B program, its impact on healthcare systems, and the implications for both hospitals and independent clinicians. Understand the need for transparency and potential reforms to align the program with its original goals.👥 Co-HostsAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentator📌 Episode OverviewIn this episode, the hosts delve into the complexities of the 340B program, exploring its origins, current state, and the implications for hospitals and independent clinicians. They discuss how the program, initially intended to support hospitals serving low-income patients, has evolved into a significant revenue stream for large health systems, often at the expense of independent practices and without clear benefits to the intended beneficiaries. The conversation also touches on potential reforms and the need for greater transparency and accountability.Episode Links https://www.healthaffairs.org/content/forefront/340b-drug-pricing-program-capped-safety-net-granthttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/2821579💬 Notable Quotes"340B was created to help hospitals serving low-income patients.""The program has expanded to include 60,000 sites.""Hospitals can profit by reselling discounted drugs.""Independent clinicians face competitive disadvantages.""340B funds are not always used for patient care."📚 What You’ll LearnThe origins and current state of the 340B program.How hospitals leverage the program for revenue.The competitive disadvantages faced by independent clinicians.The lack of transparency in fund usage.Potential reforms to align the program with its original goals.⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)00:00:00 Introduction to 340B00:03:00 The MRI Discussion00:09:00 340B Program Origins00:18:00 Current State of 340B00:27:00 Implications for Clinicians00:36:00 Calls for Reform🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a text🎯 Why ListenWhen Senator Chuck Schumer joined Dr. Mike’s podcast to discuss “The Truth About the Government Shutdown,” the talk quickly became a lesson in political spin. In this episode, the co-hosts of The Rojas Report dissect Schumer’s claims, challenge Dr. Mike’s deference, and unpack the policy mechanics behind Medicaid, ACA subsidies, and America’s trillion-dollar healthcare debate. Expect blunt analysis, sharp data, and unapologetic truth-telling about what’s really driving costs.👥 Co-HostsDutch Rojas – Founder, Bliksem HealthAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentatorDan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocateSanat Dixit, MD, FACS – Neurosurgeon, Huntsville, AL; Faculty, Vanderbilt University📌 Episode OverviewThe team takes aim at Dr. Mike’s viral interview with Senator Schumer—an “objective” discussion packed with partisan narratives. They analyze the claim that 51,000 lives would be lost if ACA subsidies expire, break down Medicaid’s ballooning cost, and expose how CON laws and physician ownership bans stifle innovation.They reveal how so-called “cuts” usually mean slower spending growth, not reductions, and how government subsidies distort markets and drive dependency. From the flawed Yale study to the Medicaid surge, the hosts show how fear-based messaging distracts from the real issue: structural inefficiency and lost patient value.💬 Notable Quotes“This isn’t healthcare—it’s politics disguised as compassion.”“Schumer’s Law: when your only rebuttal is ‘you want people to die,’ you’ve lost.”“Physicians aren’t asking for permission to get rich. We’re asking for permission to build.”“Having an insurance card doesn’t mean you have care—it means you’ve been pacified.”📚 What You’ll LearnWhy the “51,000 deaths” claim collapses under scrutinyHow ACA subsidies and Medicaid expansion fuel inefficiencyThe economics of CON laws and physician ownership bansWhat’s driving the trillion-dollar Medicaid curveHow fear replaces facts in healthcare politicsWhy competition—not control—drives value⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)00:00 – Opening & host reunion02:00 – The “51,000 deaths” narrative05:30 – ACA subsidy breakdown08:00 – Rising costs & access failures17:00 – Medicaid myths and market distortion21:00 – CON laws & physician freedom28:00 – The trillion-dollar Medicaid surge35:00 – Political spin & “you want people to die”44:00 – Government control vs. patient value47:00 – What real reform looks like🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a text🎯 Why ListenThis episode is a no-holds-barred takedown of how hospitals manipulate billing codes, exploit DRG loopholes, and increase patient risk—all while squeezing out independent physicians. Whether you’re a patient, policymaker, or healthcare insider, you’ll walk away questioning everything you thought you knew about how hospitals operate behind the scenes.👥 Co-HostsDutch Rojas – Founder, Bliksem HealthAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentatorDan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voiceSanat Dixit, MD, FACS – Neurosurgeon, Huntsville, AL; Faculty, Vanderbilt University; healthcare entrepreneur📌 Episode OverviewThe doctors dissect the dysfunction in modern hospital billing and patient care—from the abuses of DRG (Diagnosis-Related Group) upcoding to the death of clinical nuance. You’ll hear how hospital administrators have replaced medical decision-making with spreadsheet logic, pushing sicker patients to outpatient settings and putting them at greater risk.From the financial shell game of “death to discharge” timing to how non-profit systems rake in billions while physicians are told to “be more efficient,” this conversation is a masterclass in healthcare grift. They also explore the breakdown of physician-hospital trust and how the corporatization of medicine is compromising care at every level.💬 Notable Quotes“Hospitals get paid the same if you do a craniotomy on a healthy 30-year-old or a 95-year-old in kidney failure.” – Anthony DiGiorgio“DRGs reward risk, not responsibility.” – Dan Choi“The ‘death to discharge’ metric is not clinical. It’s financial.” – Sanat Dixit“The whole system is designed to offload cost and blame—onto doctors.” – Anish Koka“We should not be giving up the power of admitting. That’s the control point of medicine.” – Dutch Rojas📚 What You’ll LearnHow DRG reimbursement leads to dangerous patient dischargesWhy hospitals push risky patients to outpatient careThe shocking flat-rate payment system for complex surgeriesHow hospital metrics hide bad outcomes while gaming revenueWhy physician autonomy is being eroded by administrationThe financial incentive for “just discharge” over “get well”How upcoding and quality metrics warp patient careWhy real reform must come from physicians—not bureaucrats⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)00:00 – Intro & physician burnout03:45 – DRG basics and gaming the system08:20 – Death to discharge: a dangerous metric13:00 – Why outcomes don’t match the data17:40 – Hospital profit motives vs. clinical sense23:30 – Why hospitals don’t want to admit27:00 – The decline of physician-led decisions32:45 – Hospitalists, PAs, and revenue generation37:50 – Why quality metrics miss the point42:10 – The real impact on patients47:00 – Final thoughts: reform or revolution?🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a text🎯 Why ListenIn this fiery and insightful episode, the doctors dissect the political and economic fault lines behind the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the looming government shutdown, and the multi-billion-dollar subsidies keeping America’s healthcare afloat. From insurance distortions and Medicaid loopholes to why the system rewards bureaucracy over care, this is an unfiltered conversation that finally makes sense of why “affordable” healthcare isn’t affordable at all.👥 Co-HostsAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentatorDan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voice📌 Episode OverviewThe Doctors Lounge crew dives deep into how the ACA reshaped the U.S. insurance market—and why its subsidies, risk-pool manipulations, and Medicaid expansions are once again threatening a government shutdown. The conversation unpacks the math, morality, and market failures behind healthcare costs, from “catastrophic” plan bans to how illegal immigration and emergency Medicaid quietly reshape state budgets. The hosts also debate whether the cost-containment systems (like DRGs) ever truly worked—and whether healthcare’s inflation is an inevitable design flaw or a political choice.💬 Notable Quotes“The reason healthcare is so expensive is because you passed the Affordable Care Act.” – Dr. DiGiorgio“Subsidies don’t make plans cheaper—they just hide the real cost from consumers.” – Dr. DiGiorgio“We’re shutting down the government over 7% of people—how does that make sense?” – Dr. DiGiorgio“Hospitals are thriving because DRGs keep going up; physicians’ payments keep going down.” – Dr. Choi“I’m a fan of a safety net program for a safety net population—but it has to run lean.” – Dr. DiGiorgio📚 What You’ll LearnHow ACA subsidies artificially lower premiums but raise total system costsThe real distinction between ACA marketplace plans, Medicaid, and “emergency Medicaid” for undocumented immigrantsWhy healthcare cost control mechanisms like DRGs (Diagnosis-Related Groups) failed to contain spendingThe political tug-of-war between safety nets, subsidies, and moral hazardHow hospitals and insurers profit from inefficiency—and why patients pay the price⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)00:00 – ACA subsidies, shutdown politics, and who’s to blame05:00 – The myth of “affordable” care: how mandates drove up premiums10:00 – Catastrophic plans vs. essential benefits: freedom or fairness?15:00 – How subsidies distort the market and reward inefficiency20:00 – Medicaid, undocumented care, and the “emergency reimbursement” loophole30:00 – State-level financing tricks and the hidden federal dollars behind them35:00 – Why hospitals profit under DRGs while physicians stagnate45:00 – The DRG vs. cost-plus debate: can healthcare costs ever be contained?50:00 – Insurer incentives, monopolies, and the myth of quality-based care55:00 – The unfixable math of “affordable” healthcare🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a text🎯 Why ListenThis episode of The Doctor’s Lounge cuts straight into one of the most polarizing questions in U.S. healthcare: Did the Affordable Care Act (ACA) fix the system—or hand it to corporate interests? The doctors debate how government mandates, corporate lobbying, and political theater have created a bloated insurance economy that benefits everyone but patients and doctors.👥 Co-HostsDutch Rojas – Founder, Bliksem HealthAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentatorDan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voiceSanat Dixit, MD, FACS – Neurosurgeon, Huntsville, AL; Faculty, Vanderbilt University; healthcare entrepreneur📌 Episode OverviewThe doctors dissect how the ACA’s “essential health benefits” reshaped the insurance market—outlawing affordable catastrophic plans and driving premiums sky-high. From the Oregon RCT to RAND data, they reveal how mandated coverage hasn’t improved health outcomes but has fueled massive corporate profits. The group also connects the dots between nonprofit hospitals, political paralysis, and the healthcare bubble that could rival the 2008 financial crisis.They ask the hard questions:Why do politicians fight over “coverage” while ignoring the cost of care?Is America heading toward single payer—or collapse?Can innovation, transparency, and cash-based models save us from our own system?💬 Notable Quotes“Coverage is not care.” – Dr. Anish Koka“If I don’t change my tires, I risk an accident—but that doesn’t mean auto insurance should pay for tire changes.” – Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio“The number one problem in the U.S. isn’t debt—it’s premiums. Congress could fix that tomorrow.” – Dutch Rojas“Hospitals were once charities. Now they own 6% of major cities.” – Dr. Dan Choi📚 What You’ll LearnHow ACA mandates distorted the insurance marketplaceWhy nonprofit hospitals are “too big to care”The difference between coverage and care—and why the public confuses themHow regulatory gridlock blocks innovation in healthcare deliveryThe real economics of “float” and why insurance giants love the status quoWhat happens when the healthcare bubble finally pops⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)00:00 – Why tire changes and colonoscopies shouldn’t both be “insurance”02:00 – Dr. Choi on ACA subsidies and the outlawing of catastrophic plans06:00 – Essential health benefits: paternalism or policy failure?09:00 – The illusion of coverage vs. the cost of care12:00 – The business of “float” and how insurance companies built empires15:00 – The $34 trillion industry and why catastrophic plans could end it20:00 – Politicians, ignorance, and the illusion of reform27:00 – Nonprofit hospitals: charity or corporate real estate giants?35:00 – Americans waking up to the healthcare paradox43:00 – The bubble nobody talks about: premiums and power49:00 – The rise of DPC🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a text🎯 Why ListenWhat happens when private equity buys hospitals? Do staffing cuts and profit motives compromise patient safety? This episode of The Doctor’s Lounge dives into the controversial world of private equity in healthcare, the role of RVUs and the RUC, and why physicians are losing control over their profession. Expect an unfiltered discussion on power, profit, and the future of independent practice.👥 Co-HostsDutch Rojas – Founder, Bliksem HealthAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentatorDan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voiceSanat Dixit, MD, FACS – Neurosurgeon, Huntsville, AL; Faculty, Vanderbilt University; healthcare entrepreneur📌 Episode OverviewThis conversation unpacks:The hidden mechanics of RVUs and the RUC committee (and why most doctors don’t know how their pay is set).How private equity staffing cuts may be tied to increased ER deaths.Why physicians are forced to “take shelter” with private equity or large health systems.The structural inequities in U.S. healthcare that tilt the system against independent doctors.The hope found in physician-owned hospitals and physician-led enterprises.💬 Notable Quotes“Just because you have a higher RVU count does not mean you’re a better physician.” – Dr. Dan Choi “The real problem isn’t that the RUC exists—it’s that CMS has built an entire system on centrally planned values.” – Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio “When private equity is the boss, the boss isn’t a physician—it’s a portfolio manager.” – Dr. Dan Choi “We went from 75% independent practice to 12%. That’s the legacy of partnerships that never built enterprise value.” – Dutch Rojas “You don’t need to import H1Bs or expand scope. You need to let physicians own hospitals in their own communities.” – Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio 📚 What You’ll LearnHow RVUs and the RUC committee determine physician pay.The risks and trade-offs when hospitals are acquired by private equity.Why many “boomer doctors” cashed out, leaving younger physicians holding the bag.The differences between profit-driven care and physician-led models.Why physician-owned hospitals may be a solution to America’s healthcare crisis.⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)00:00 – The growing demand for private practice02:00 – Private equity: efficiency or exploitation?06:00 – Explaining RVUs and the RUC committee15:00 – Gaming the RVU system & compensation models20:00 – Myths and realities of the RUC process22:00 – Harvard study: private equity, staffing cuts & ER deaths27:00 – Physicians vs. portfolio managers: who should run healthcare?33:00 – Selling out: boomer doctors and the PE cash-out37:00 – From 75% independent practice to just 12%39:00 – Physician-owned hospitals as a solution43:00 – Can capitalism coexist with morality in medicine?50:00 – What happens if private equity is banned?52:00 – The federated model and the fight 🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a text🎯 Why ListenEver wonder who actually decides how much doctors earn for surgeries, visits, or procedures? This episode takes you inside the mysterious but powerful Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) — the body that determines physician payments for Medicare and beyond. If you care about fairness in healthcare, innovation, or why a complex surgery can pay the same as a routine one, this conversation is for you.👥 Co-HostsDutch Rojas – Founder, Bliksem HealthAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentatorDan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voiceSanat Dixit, MD, FACS – Neurosurgeon, Huntsville, AL; Faculty, Vanderbilt University; healthcare entrepreneur📌 Episode OverviewIn this special “Side Table” edition, the Doctors Lounge digs into the RVU Update Committee (RUC) — the physician-led but AMA-controlled group that sets values for CPT codes, essentially determining how doctors get paid. The hosts explore:How the RUC works and who sits on itWhy budget neutrality forces specialties to fight for valueThe unintended consequences of central planning, including stifling innovationThe fairness debate between primary care and high-intensity procedural specialtiesWhy physicians themselves are both defenders and critics of the system💬 Notable Quotes“The RUC is essentially central planning — every doctor gets paid the same for the same code, no matter the experience.”“Becoming better at your procedure can actually punish you — the faster and safer you get, the less you’re paid.”“It’s a system that preserves order, but at the expense of innovation and sometimes fairness.”📚 What You’ll LearnWhat the RUC is and how it shapes U.S. physician paymentThe mechanics of how CPT codes are valuedWhy Medicare’s budget neutrality keeps physician fees locked in zero-sum battlesHow new technologies like robotics and advanced ablation are undervaluedWhy primary care vs. specialty debates rarely get settled at the RUC tableThe pros and cons of a physician-run payment-setting system⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)[00:00] What is the RUC and why it matters[02:00] The history: from “reasonable and customary” to RVUs[05:00] Who sits on the RUC and how they’re chosen[07:00] Central planning vs. innovation — robotic surgery as a case study[10:00] How physician surveys shape payment values[15:00] Specialty vs. primary care debates[20:00] Why new procedures often get undervalued[23:00] Should the RUC be reformed… or blown up?🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a text🎯 Why ListenJournalist Ben Ryan joins the panel to unpack what really happened during the 2022 monkeypox outbreak, how public health messaging shaped public perception, and why institutions like the CDC are facing a crisis of trust. With decades of experience covering HIV and infectious disease, Ryan shares his perspective on risk communication, stigma, and the politics that shaped pandemic response.👥 HostAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentator⭐ Special GuestBen Ryan – Independent journalist; writer for The New York Times, Washington Post, NBC News, New York Post; author of the Substack Hazard RatioWebsite: benryan.netSubstack: benryan.substack.comX/Twitter: @benryanwriter📌 Episode OverviewThis episode dives into the monkeypox epidemic and the lessons it offers about public health credibility. Ben Ryan, whose reporting has appeared in leading national outlets, explains why he immediately recognized the outbreak as one concentrated within the gay community—and why public officials failed to say so clearly. The discussion covers stigma, vaccine rollout, behavior change, institutional groupthink, and what the CDC’s politicization means for future outbreaks.💬 Notable Quotes“Children were more likely to be struck by lightning than to get monkeypox.” – Ben Ryan“The CDC prioritized not hurting feelings over delivering clear, direct health information.” – Ben Ryan“Public trust is lost when officials carve out exceptions for ideology while ignoring obvious risk patterns.” – Ben Ryan📚 What You’ll LearnWhy monkeypox spread primarily among gay men and what the data showed in real timeHow fear of stigma influenced CDC messaging—and its unintended consequencesThe role of behavior change vs. vaccination in halting the outbreakWhy politicization and groupthink are eroding trust in public health institutionsWhat lessons from HIV and COVID-19 should have informed monkeypox response⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)[00:00] Why monkeypox caught Ben Ryan’s attention[02:00] Introduction to Ben Ryan’s reporting background[03:30] CDC departures and politicization[05:00] Stigma vs. direct communication in outbreak messaging[07:30] Misleading slogans and their public impact[10:00] Inside the CDC’s vaccine rollout strategy[13:00] Groupthink and public health language shifts[15:00] The clash between activism, stigma, and behavior change[18:00] How the LGBT community actually responded[20:00] Natural immunity, vaccine uptake, and why the outbreak ended[22:00] What future outbreaks may look like and lessons for public health🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a text🎯 Why ListenA spicy, inside-baseball roundtable on why rural healthcare dollars keep missing physicians, how enterprise EHRs and retail chains distort priorities, and why media narratives around leaders’ health go off the rails. Practical, provocative, and very quotable.👥 Co-HostsDutch Rojas – Founder, Bliksem HealthAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentatorDan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voiceSanat Dixit, MD, FACS – Neurosurgeon, Huntsville, AL; Faculty, Vanderbilt University; healthcare entrepreneur📌 Episode OverviewThe crew dissects a new $50B rural health initiative that appears to route funds around independent and physician-owned facilities—prioritizing large systems, pricey EHRs, and even retail partners. They debate Sen. Bill Cassidy and vaccine policy rhetoric, explain how public-choice incentives drive misallocation, and compare U.S. access with Canada’s waitlists (and the medical-tourism pull). They also pick apart Walmart/Dollar General clinic models, why scale struggles without physician workflow design, and how media incentives skew clinical stories—especially around presidential health.💬 Notable Quotes“There’s a lot of money being thrown at them to tell them what to think.” (00:12:58)“If a doctor can ace organic chemistry, you can learn HR and build a clinic.” (00:35:58)“This is a misallocation of $50 billion.” (00:18:15)“Business thinks pull and scale; medicine runs on relationships.” (00:32:00)“Truth doesn’t scale if your audience wants rage-clicks.” (00:56:15)📚 What You’ll LearnHow funding criteria (affiliations, Epic mandates, retail tie-ins) push out independents.Why public-choice theory explains hospital lobbying advantage.Where Walmart/Dollar General clinic plays fell short—and what physician design would fix.Practical clinic-flow lessons: blueprinting around patient movement and staff placement.The difference between population-level policies and individualized bedside decisions.How media incentives distort clinical narratives about public figures.Why medical tourism grows when domestic access shrinks.⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)00:00 Cold open: lobbying, misallocated capital03:36 Housekeeping + PHA conference preview (19 interviews)05:06 Senator Cassidy, vaccine takes, and pharma donations discourse12:59 Why lawmakers misunderstand delivery & finance15:27 Rural funds, EHR mandates (Epic), and retail partners (Dollar General)23:07 Canada wait times, border medical tourism, cash-pay joints28:00 Walmart clinic lessons: price points, demand, and execution32:00 Scale vs. relationships: designing clinics that actually work38:00 Presidential health narratives, COVID memory, media speculation56:15 Ratings, advertisers, and why “truth” often loses to clicks1:06:20 Next up: 340B and payer–provider “dance”; wr🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a text🎯 Why ListenDive into one of the most consequential debates in medicine: how should the FDA balance speed, safety, and patient need in approving new drugs and gene therapies? Dr. Bob Goldberg, joins the Doctors Lounge to unpack regulatory science, RCTs, accelerated approvals, and the controversies around muscular dystrophy treatments.👥 Co-HostsDutch Rojas – Founder, Bliksem HealthAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentatorDan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voiceSanat Dixit, MD, FACS – Neurosurgeon, Huntsville, AL; Faculty, Vanderbilt University; healthcare entrepreneur✨ Special GuestBob Goldberg, PhD – Co-Founder & Vice President, Center for Medicine in the Public Interest📌 Episode OverviewThis episode explores the tension between innovation and evidence in drug development. Dr. Goldberg shares his decades of work in FDA reform and patient-centered drug development. The discussion spans accelerated approvals, Sarepta’s muscular dystrophy drugs, RCTs vs. real-world evidence, and the risks of leaning too far toward either bureaucratic caution or patient desperation.💬 Notable Quotes“Drug development is harder than hitting a fastball Sandy Koufax would throw.” – Bob Goldberg“Randomization is a very limited tool… there are many more ways to generate meaningful evidence.” – Bob Goldberg“If we don’t have some dead ends in accelerated approvals, then we’re not doing enough of them.” – Janet Woodcock (quoted by co-hosts)“Patients don’t care about motor function endpoints—they care about breathing, dignity, and independence.” – Bob Goldberg📚 What You’ll LearnWhy RCTs are not always the gold standard in rare diseasesThe backstory of Sarepta’s muscular dystrophy approvalsHow patient-centered drug development reshapes trial endpointsThe role of politics and policy in FDA decision-makingBarriers that slow innovation, from trial costs to regulatory red tapeHow AI and adaptive trial design could accelerate safer drug development⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)00:00 – Regulatory science, biomarkers, and the challenge of precision medicine01:00 – Introduction of guest Dr. Bob Goldberg02:00 – Background: Center for Medicine in the Public Interest & FDA reform06:00 – The limits of randomization and the rise of precision endpoints10:00 – Gene therapy for muscular dystrophy: risks, deaths, and FDA holds14:00 – Critiques of Vinay Prasad and the politics of FDA appointments20:00 – Exondys 51, Sarepta, and the accelerated approval debate30:00 – Historical parallels: AIDS drug approvals and patient advocacy40:00 – Patient-centered drug development and real-world data50:00 – Trial design inefficiencies, AI, and regulatory bottlenecks57:00 – Pharma lobbying, PBMs, and the rebate system01:04:00 – Public perception, patient voice, and FDA trust01:09:00 – Closing though🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a text🎯 Why ListenWhen an 88-year-old with dementia lands in the hospital, should we implant a device simply “because we can”? The panel examines futile care, ICU economics, malpractice fears, and the cultural bias to always “do something.” With special guest JP Kolcun, a seventh-year neurosurgery resident, they also debate whether physician-owned hospitals could restore dignity, efficiency, and leadership to American medicine.👥 Co-HostsDutch Rojas – Founder, Bliksem HealthAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentatorDan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voiceSanat Dixit, MD, FACS – Neurosurgeon, Huntsville, AL; Faculty, Vanderbilt University; healthcare entrepreneurSpecial Guest: JP Kolcun, MD – Seventh-year neurosurgery resident, Rush University, Chicago📌 Episode OverviewThe panel examines costly end-of-life interventions like Watchman devices, asking whether they truly benefit frail patients and what dignity looks like when medicine defaults to “doing something.” In the second half, they debate physician-owned hospitals, exploring how lifting ACA restrictions could improve efficiency, reduce burnout, and restore physician leadership in patient-centered care.💬 Notable Quotes“Wherever the art of medicine is loved, there is humanity.” – Hippocrates, quoted during the episode“Government is a poor deployer of capital.”“Who would you rather have running a hospital—someone oath-bound, or someone only bound by greed?”📚 What You’ll LearnWhy left atrial appendage occluders spark debate about futility and cost at the end of lifeHow Medicare’s spending patterns shape hospital incentivesThe tension between physician judgment, family wishes, and systemic pressuresWhat Section 6001 of the ACA did to physician-owned hospitalsWhy physician-led care models could improve efficiency and morale in healthcareBroader reflections on dignity, values, and the role of physicians in society⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)[00:01:30] Introductions, JP Colcun rejoins the panel[00:04:00] End-of-life spending and Watchman device outcomes[00:08:00] The 40% mortality problem in device patients[00:13:00] Futility, family wishes, and medical-legal pressures[00:17:00] Medicare’s role and distorted spending incentives[00:22:00] Dignity, third-party payment, and lost physician “quarterbacks”[00:30:00] Transition to physician-owned hospitals[00:33:00] Section 6001 of the ACA explained[00:36:00] Physician burnout and hospital inefficiencies[00:44:00] The nonprofit hospital paradox[00:50:00] Closing reflections: restoring physician entrepreneurship and values🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a text🎯 Why ListenOrgan donation is one of the most emotional and misunderstood processes in modern medicine. In this minisode, the hosts tackle the ethics, procedures, and misconceptions around declaring death and procuring organs. Whether you’re a healthcare professional, patient advocate, or simply someone who has “organ donor” on your driver’s license, this conversation offers rare clarity and compassion on a deeply human subject.👥 Co-HostsAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentator📌 Episode OverviewThis minisode dives into the practical and ethical dimensions of organ donation—focusing on how doctors determine death, the role of families, and the procedures that follow catastrophic brain injuries. Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio explains the two main pathways to organ donation: brain death and donation after cardiac death (DCD). The discussion explores how organ procurement teams interact with hospitals, why state laws differ (California being unique in honoring driver’s license consent over family objections), and how protocols aim to preserve dignity while enabling life-saving transplants.💬 Notable Quotes“It’s heart wrenching to declare someone dead—these are often young patients who have had some tragedy.”“We would never do this on someone who had a meaningful shot at getting up and walking out of there.”“There’s a strong wall between the caregiving team and the organ procurement team.”“Comfort care protocols ensure patients feel no air hunger—this is about dignity, not hastening death.”📚 What You’ll LearnThe two medical pathways to organ donation: brain death vs. donation after cardiac death (DCD).Why protocols and wait times (e.g., UCSF’s 90-minute rule for DCD) exist to ensure ethical clarity.The legal weight of organ donor status on a driver’s license, and how it can supersede family wishes in California.The separation of duties between doctors caring for patients and organ procurement teams.How misconceptions—like those fueled by media reports—can distort public understanding of donation.⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)[00:00] Declaring death: brain death vs. cardiac death[02:00] Testing and confirming brain death[04:00] The role of families and living wills in donation decisions[06:00] Organ procurement teams—how and when they get involved[08:00] UCSF’s 90-minute DCD protocol explained[10:00] Addressing New York Times reporting and public misconceptions[12:00] Comfort care, ethics, and ensuring dignity in end-of-life scenarios[14:00] Why organ donation is never about pressure, but about honoring life after tragedy🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a text🎯 Why ListenNorth Carolina approved a bill letting some international medical grads practice without U.S. residency. Smart fix for shortages—or a back door for cheaper labor that risks quality? We break down patient impact, wages, malpractice, and what it means for the profession. Plus: Vinay Prasad’s surprise return to the FDA, catastrophic insurance, and why prices stay opaque.👥 Co-HostsDutch Rojas – Founder, Bliksem HealthAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentatorDan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voiceSanat Dixit, MD, FACS – Neurosurgeon, Huntsville, AL; Faculty, Vanderbilt University; healthcare entrepreneur📌 Episode OverviewNC Bill 67: Why hospitals pushed it; how it bypasses standard vetting.Licensure’s false security—and the “Dr. Death” lesson.Will cheaper labor deter U.S. trainees and suppress wages?Malpractice/insurance: who absorbs the risk?Commoditizing clinicians: PR, checklists, and EHR clicks over care.Quick hits: Prasad’s FDA comeback and how the ACA erased catastrophic plans.💬 Notable Quotes“This is an employer-driven bill. Hospitals need cogs, not clinicians.” – Dan Choi“Licensure can give a false sense of security.” – Anish Koka“Import cheaper labor and U.S. grads will walk.” – Sanat Dixit“Killing catastrophic plans killed price signals.” – Anthony DiGiorgio📚 What You’ll LearnHow IMG parity reshapes the pipeline—and who wins.Why incentives, not slogans, drive workforce behavior.The hospital risk calculus: compliance vs. clinical judgment.Lobbying’s role in workforce policy.How restoring catastrophic coverage could revive real markets.⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)00:00–07:30 NC Bill 67—IMGs sans U.S. residency07:30–13:00 Licensure gaps & Dr. Death13:00–22:30 Wages, “STEM coolies,” incentives22:30–29:30 NP scope, hospital demand, commoditization29:30–34:45 Professional standards & patient trust34:45–41:00 Lobbying power and politics41:00–48:00 Vinay Prasad, FDA, biotech pushback48:00–54:00 Catastrophic insurance & ACA effects54:00–End Price transparency, DTE contracts, fixing incentives🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a text🎯 Why ListenIs there really a physician shortage—or just bad incentives driving doctors out of practice? In this episode, the crew unpacks Representative Greg Murphy’s call for more foreign-trained doctors, the real barriers U.S. medical students face, the role of residency caps, gender dynamics in the physician workforce, and why private practice may hold the key to keeping doctors in medicine.👥 Co-HostsDutch Rojas – Founder, Bliksem HealthAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentatorDan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voiceSanat Dixit, MD, FACS – Neurosurgeon, Huntsville, AL; Faculty, Vanderbilt University; healthcare entrepreneur📌 Episode OverviewThe “physician shortage” debate: is it real, or misallocation + burnout?U.S. med school demand vs. residency bottlenecks—and the 1997 cap that still shapes supply.H-1B visas for international medical graduates: help or band-aid?Gender workforce dynamics: why more women physicians work part-time and how that affects access.Why doctors leave clinical medicine early—and what would keep them in practice.Policy solutions: site neutrality, physician-owned hospitals, and cutting through regulatory capture.💬 Notable Quotes“The ultimate failure of central planning is thinking you can measure physician demand.” – Anthony DiGiorgio“We have plenty of talent in the U.S.—why not open more medical schools and residency spots?” – Dan Choi“If being a doctor were enjoyable again, we wouldn’t be having this shortage conversation.” – Anish Koka“When physicians ran healthcare, the focus was on patients. Locking us out created today’s inefficiencies.” – Dan Choi📚 What You’ll LearnWhy residency slots—not interest in medicine—are the true bottleneck.How CMS payment and hospital consolidation drive burnout and early exits.The economic tradeoffs of foreign-trained vs. U.S.-trained physicians.How gender dynamics reshape workforce numbers.Policy levers that could restore independence and fix misaligned incentives.⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)00:00–02:00 Cold open: physician demand, central planning & burnout02:00–06:30 Rep. Greg Murphy, H-1B visas, and the med school acceptance gap06:30–13:00 U.S. applicants denied vs. foreign-trained routes; debt vs. no-debt training13:00–16:30 Gender gap: women in medicine, part-time work, and policy backlash16:30–21:30 1997 residency budget cap and whether slots are the real bottleneck21:30–28:30 Private practice vs. health system consolidation: patient access and efficiency28:30–36:00 RFK Jr.’s comments on physicians, incentives, and the “food as medicine” debate36:00–46:00 Free market fixes: site neutrality, physician-owned hospitals, deregulation46:00–55:00 Burnout, EMR inefficiencies, verbal order regulations, and why physicians leave••55:00–End Closing reflections + next episode teaser🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a textOriginal Substack Release: Aug 23, 2025🎯 Why ListenWhen hope collides with billion-dollar incentives, who protects patients? We unpack Vinay Prasad’s FDA resignation, Sarepta’s $3.2M Duchenne gene therapy, and how accelerated approvals can leave families without the long-term data they deserve.👥 Co-HostsDutch Rojas – Founder, Bliksem HealthAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentatorDan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voiceSanat Dixit, MD, FACS – Neurosurgeon, Huntsville, AL; Faculty, Vanderbilt University; healthcare entrepreneur📌 Episode OverviewVinay Prasad’s exit from FDA/CBER and what it signals about evidence, safety, and politics.Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Sarepta’s one-shot gene therapy, and deaths linked to vector toxicity.The promise and peril of accelerated approvals—and why confirmatory trials so often stall.Left vs. right myths about healthcare; markets, incentives, and why “healthcare is a right” can fail in practice.Quick hits: public-good economics in medicine, decentralization vs. central control, and where AI may actually help (RCM, workflow).💬 Notable Quotes“These trials are never gonna get done. It’s a game—with patients as pawns.”“The FDA is the Midas touch: approval turns hope into revenue—fast.”“You don’t want a world where healthcare is non-excludable and non-rivalrous.”“If healthcare is ‘first, do no harm,’ who decides what harm looks like—and who pays the price?”📚 What You’ll LearnHow accelerated approval works—and where it breaks.Why safety signals (e.g., vector-related liver failure) matter more than press releases.The difference between hope, evidence, and incentives in rare disease.How political tribes systematically misunderstand healthcare mechanics.Practical places AI can improve care operations today.⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)00:00–01:10 Welcome back & cadence update (new Sunday drops)01:10–07:40 Vinay Prasad resigns from FDA/CBER—context and stakes07:40–13:30 Duchenne 101, dystrophin biology, trial endpoints vs. real outcomes13:30–17:30 Accelerated approval promises vs. missing confirmatory trials17:30–22:30 Safety signals: vector immunogenicity, reported deaths, what pulls look like22:30–28:30 Media/influencer pressure and the politics of “right to try”28:30–41:30 Is healthcare a public good? Scarcity, incentives, and economic reality41:30–50:30 Government, morality, and why central planning fails patients50:30–59:30 AI, agents, and near-term wins in physician workflows59:30–End What we need next from policymakers—and from clinicians🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a textOriginal Substack Release Date: August 29, 2025🎯 Why ListenHeard “surprise billing” blamed on doctors? This episode shows how insurers shaped the narrative, how the No Surprises Act (NSA) was meant to protect patients, why weak enforcement broke it, and what Rep. Greg Murphy’s No Surprises Enforcement Act could fix.👥 Co-HostsDutch Rojas – Founder, Bliksem HealthAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist; healthcare policy commentatorDan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon; healthcare advocateSanat Dixit, MD, FACS – Neurosurgeon; Faculty, Vanderbilt; entrepreneur📌 Episode OverviewThe insurer-made “surprise billing” label and how network design boxes out small practices.NY arbitration (market-based, patient kept out) vs CA benchmarking (median in-network → narrower networks).The gap: doctors win arbitrations; insurers don’t pay. Murphy’s bill adds deadlines and penalties.Plus: FDA leadership, gene therapy tradeoffs (safety vs efficacy, tiny trials, huge prices), and a quick take on homelessness policy and harm reduction.💬 Notable Quotes“‘Surprise billing’ was insurer spin for an insurer problem.”“If you can’t charge fair market rates, you can’t stay independent.”“Science doesn’t have a left or right—only signals to read.”📚 What You’ll LearnHow network contracting disadvantages small practices.Why arbitration design changes insurer behavior.How enforcement determines whether NSA works.The real-world costs and evidence hurdles of gene therapies.Ways practicing physicians can still shape policy.⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)00:00–03:30 Order vs. healthcare chaos03:30–09:30 Why clinicians wade into policy10:00–13:30 In-network vs. out-of-network13:30–19:00 “Surprise bills” demystified19:00–23:45 NY arbitration vs. CA benchmarking26:30–33:15 The NSA enforcement problem & Murphy’s fix33:15–41:30 FDA, Vinay Prasad, Duchenne gene therapy56:00–1:04:00 Homelessness policy: housing-first vs. institutional care🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a textOriginal Substack Release Date: August 9, 2025🎯 Why ListenThis episode pulls no punches on the future of physician independence. From the looming physician shortage to the retaliatory tactics of insurers, you’ll hear an unscripted conversation about the raw realities inside American healthcare—and the strategies physicians can use to fight back.👥 Co-HostsDutch Rojas – Founder, Bliksem HealthAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentatorDan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voiceSanat Dixit, MD, FACS – Neurosurgeon, Huntsville, AL; Faculty, Vanderbilt University; healthcare entrepreneur📌 Episode OverviewThree of the country’s sharpest physician voices—and guest Heath Veuleman—expose how insurers, hospitals, and even physicians themselves are reshaping healthcare in America. They tackle the physician shortage, why physician-owned hospitals outperform on cost and quality, and how small practices can unite to take on monopolistic health systems. If you’ve ever wondered what’s really happening behind the curtain, this is the conversation you won’t hear in a boardroom.💬 Notable Quote“We’ve only got about 1.1 million physicians left. 38% are going to age out in the next 60 months. Physicians have way more leverage than they know—they just don’t realize it yet.” — Heath Veuleman📚 What You’ll LearnWhy 38% of U.S. physicians could be gone in five years—and why it’s not just burnoutThe insurer retaliation playbook used against independent doctorsHow physician-owned hospitals lower costs, improve outcomes, and raise patient satisfaction—but remain shackled by federal lawWhy physicians’ biggest threat is internal: self-sabotage and lack of collaborationThe business case for direct contracting and bypassing third-party payersHow to scale small practices into a coordinated force against hospital monopolies⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)[00:00] Why physician-owned hospitals matter[06:00] The coming physician shortage and workforce crisis[14:00] Why hyper-focused specialty hospitals succeed[22:00] Direct contracting: cutting out the middlemen[28:00] Insurer retaliation against outspoken physicians[36:00] Fragmentation, duplication, and cost inflation in healthcare[45:00] Outpatient innovation vs. hospital inefficiency[53:00] Regulatory barriers and the moratorium on physician-owned hospitals[57:00] Signs we’re at the end of a healthcare cycle[01:02:00] Physician leverage, consumer awakening, and the next wave of reform🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a textOriginal Substack Release Date: July 20,2025🎯 Why ListenPrior authorization is the bureaucratic chokehold strangling American healthcare. But this episode isn’t just venting — it’s a masterclass in how the system got built, why it persists, and where leverage actually lies. From AI-driven denials to Medicare’s looming funding cliff, we break down the forces shaping care today and what physicians and patients can do about it. 👥 Co-HostsDutch Rojas – Founder, Bliksem HealthAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentatorDan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voiceSanat Dixit, MD, FACS – Neurosurgeon, Huntsville, AL; Faculty, Vanderbilt University; healthcare entrepreneur📌 Episode OverviewWhat happens when AI is weaponized on both sides of prior authorization? One side uses it to deny care, the other to fight back with automated letters of medical necessity. In this episode, the panel dives into:How insurers and employers hold the real keys to pre-auth.Why 66% of patients covered by self-funded plans could eliminate it tomorrow.The Medicare cliff — and how boomer physicians’ choices set up today’s workforce.Whether raising the Medicare eligibility age or tying licensure to Medicare participation are realistic fixes.Why restoring physician autonomy may be the only path to sustainable care.This is a roadmap for doctors and patients alike who want to see through the illusion of “insurance as healthcare.”💬 Notable Quotes“This system isn’t designed for patients. It’s not designed for physicians. It’s designed for delay, denial, and distraction.” – Dutch Rojas“Every week, I get calls: friends of friends who can’t get in to see a specialist for months. That’s the storm coming.” – Dan Choi, MD“If you took lifetime Medicare contributions and put them in an HSA, indexed to the S&P 500, every retiree would have $2 million. Are you telling me they couldn’t manage their care better than Medicare can?” – Anthony DiGiorgio, DO“Doctors don’t value themselves. They accept crumbs, when they’re sitting on a goldmine of skill and trust.” – Dutch Rojas“We’re spending billions managing the money instead of managing the medicine.” – Sanat Dixit, MD📚 What You’ll LearnWhy AI is now a central player in the prior auth wars.The real difference between self-funded and fully insured plans — and why HR may hold the key to faster approvals.How boomer physicians’ decisions shaped today’s lack of autonomy in medicine.The economic and political pressures that make Medicare access increasingly fragile.Practical steps doctors can take now to push back on pre-auth and reclaim time for patients.⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)[00:00] Welcome & Dan Choi’s foot drop case[05:30] Prior auth: emergency vs elective realities🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a textOriginal Substack Release Date: Jun 18th, 2025🎯 Why ListenThis week’s episode takes you inside the chaos rocking organized medicine: ACIP’s sudden purge, the AMA’s meltdown, and the war over who really speaks for America’s doctors. If you’ve ever wondered how medical “consensus” is manufactured—and who benefits—this is the episode to hear.👥 Co-HostsDutch Rojas – Founder, Bliksem HealthAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentatorDan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voiceSanat Dixit, MD, FACS – Neurosurgeon, Huntsville, AL; Faculty, Vanderbilt University; healthcare entrepreneur📌 Episode OverviewRFK Jr. just dismissed the entire vaccine advisory committee (ACIP). The AMA immediately demanded a Senate investigation. Physicians across the country are furious, divided, and asking: who speaks for medicine now?The hosts dissect:The politics and economics hidden inside “independent” vaccine committeesThe AMA’s emergency session and whether medical trainees really control policyWhy doctors keep fighting each other while insurers and hospitals grow strongerWhether this is the turning point for physicians to stop tweeting—and start reclaiming their profession💬 Notable Quotes“Primary care doctors are getting paid less than plumbers—and somehow they’re the ones being blamed.”“If Medicaid were truly a safety net, why are insurers profiting like it’s Wall Street?”“The moment patients control the money, the system collapses—and that’s what terrifies them.”📚 What You’ll LearnWhy the ACIP purge matters far beyond COVIDHow the AMA House of Delegates really works (and why residents and students may wield outsized power)The difference between public health paternalism and authoritarianismWhy private practice viability might be medicine’s most important battlefield⏱ The Episode (Timestamps)00:00 – Setting the stage: RFK Jr. fires ACIP02:00 – What ACIP is and why it lost credibility07:00 – Economics, conflicts of interest, and vaccine committees12:00 – Groupthink, ideology, and dissent in medicine20:00 – From COVID mandates to authoritarian overreach25:00 – Inside the AMA House of Delegates emergency resolution35:00 – Who really controls the AMA (students, residents, administrators?)42:00 – Why physicians keep fighting themselves instead of uniting48:00 – The case for saving—and reforming—the AMA50:00 – A call to arms: private practice and physician-led advocacy🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a textOriginal Substack Release Date: June 14th, 2025🎯 Why ListenWhen the New England Journal of Medicine claims that direct primary care threatens the “common good,” four practicing physicians step into the ring. This episode isn’t just a rebuttal, it’s a full-throated defense of medical freedom, patient choice, and the future of primary care. If you want to understand how Medicaid has morphed from a safety net into a subsidy machine—and why academics and policymakers are terrified of patients controlling their own dollars—this episode is essential.Co-HostsDutch Rojas – Founder, Bliksem Health Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcherAnish Koka, MD – Cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentatorDan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voiceSanat Dixit, MD, FACS – Neurosurgeon, Huntsville, AL; Faculty, Vanderbilt University; healthcare entrepreneurEpisode OverviewThe NEJM op-ed that sparked outrage: framing DPC as a social harm while ignoring why doctors are leaving the insurance system.Why direct primary care isn’t boutique medicine—it’s an economic correction to price-fixing and burnout.The Medicaid industrial complex: how states and managed care organizations profit while patients wait for access.Real numbers: Centene makes ~$18,000 per member annually, while primary care doctors earn less than plumbers.State-level gaming: double enrollment, lax verification, and taxpayer waste.A better alternative: DPC + catastrophic coverage + HSAs at less than $7,000/year.The hypocrisy of policy academics: designing broken payment systems, then blaming practicing physicians for opting out.Notable Quotes“Primary care doctors are getting paid less than plumbers—and somehow they’re the ones being blamed.” - Dr. Dan Choi “If Medicaid were truly a safety net, why are insurers profiting like it’s Wall Street?” - Dr. Dan Choi “The moment patients control the money, the system collapses—and that’s what terrifies them.” - Dr. Dan Choi What You’ll LearnWhy the NEJM perspective on DPC gets the economics wrong.How Medicaid expansion shifted from safety net to subsidy scheme.The real cost of managed Medicaid—and who profits most.Why HSAs and direct primary care offer a scalable, patient-centered alternative.How academic medicine fuels policy myths that widen access gaps.The Episode (Timestamps)00:00 – Opening banter and NEJM op-ed overview02:00 – The ideology behind calling primary care a “common good”06:00 – Economics of primary care and why DPC emerged10:00 – Medicaid’s expansion: safety net or single-payer on training wheels?20:00 – State-level gaming and provider tax loopholes29:00 – DPC + catastrophic plan + HSA: a viable alternative38:00 – Manage🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a textOriginal Substack Release Date: June 7th, 2025🎯 Why Listen:“Shut up and enjoy your salary.”—What passes for health policy debate in 2025.Does the government actually listen to doctors anymore? Or do they just think we’re a nuisance — good for photo ops, useless in policymaking?In this episode of The Doctor’s Lounge, Dutch and Anthony pull no punches on Medicare:Why Medicare is becoming more of a political weapon than a healthcare programHow physicians are silenced through salary-shaming, cancel tactics, and faux moral outrageThe growing influence of private insurers in Medicare Advantage — and who really benefitsHow policy training for medical students and experts conditions them to obey the system, not challenge itThis isn’t just a rant. It’s a roadmap for resisting. If you’re a doctor, you need to hear this. If you’re a patient, you deserve to know who’s really shaping healthcare behind the curtain.Co-Hosts:Dutch Rojas - Private Healthcare AdvocateAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcher.Anish Koka, MD – Private practice cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentator.Dan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voice.Sanat Dixit, MD, FACS - Neurosurgeon - Huntsville, AL, Faculty - Vanderbilt University; healthcare entrepreneur.Episode Overview:Medicare covers more than 65 million Americans, but its foundation is under political, financial, and operational strain. A break down how Medicare is structured, the differences between Parts A, B, C, and D, and why Medicare Advantage is both a lifeline and a lightning rod. They connect the dots between low reimbursement rates, rising administrative control, and the silencing of physician voices in policymaking. Along the way, they expose the hypocrisy of those who dictate policy without participating in the systems they regulate — and what it will take to restore physician autonomy and patient-first care.Notable Quotes:“Medicare was built on a promise — but promises need funding and accountability to work.” – Anthony DiGiorgio“When private insurers run Medicare Advantage, the incentives shift — and sometimes patients aren’t the winners.” – Dutch RojasThe Episode:00:00 – Welcome & Introduction01:20 – What Medicare Covers and Who Qualifies05:10 – The Funding Structure of Medicare09:40 – Breaking Down Part A, B, C, and D14:15 – Reimbursement Challenges in Medicare19:25 – Medicare Advantage: Pros and Cons24:50 – How Politics Shapes Medicare Policy30:15 – Real-World Stories from the Field35:00 – Potential Reforms and the Future of Medicare39:30 – Closing Thoughts🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a text🎯 Why Listen:A candid conversation on whether non-compete clauses in physician contracts harm doctors, patients, and the healthcare system — and what real reform might look like.Co-Hosts:Dutch Rojas - Private Healthcare AdvocateAnthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcher.Anish Koka, MD – Private practice cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentator.Dan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voice.Sanat Dixit, MD, FACS Episode Overview:Dutch and Anthony tackle the controversial topic of non-compete clauses in physician contracts — exploring their history, how they affect patient access, and whether proposed bans could change the landscape for both independent and employed doctors. Along the way, they discuss the unintended consequences of eliminating non-competes, the corporate pushback against reform, and what a balanced solution might look like.Notable Quotes:“When a hospital locks down a doctor with a non-compete, they’re really locking down the patients.” – Anthony DiGiorgio“If we want more competition in healthcare, we can’t keep building fences around physicians.” – Dutch RojasThe Episode:00:00 – Welcome & Introduction01:10 – What Are Non-Competes?03:45 – The History Behind Physician Non-Competes07:20 – How Non-Competes Limit Patient Access10:40 – The FTC’s Proposed Ban & Pushback15:05 – Hospital Arguments for Keeping Non-Competes19:15 – Potential Unintended Consequences24:00 – Case Studies: When Non-Competes Hurt Communities29:30 – Alternatives to Non-Competes34:50 – What Real Reform Could Look Like38:10 – Closing Thoughts🔗 Connect with the Hosts: • Dutch Rojas on X • Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X • Dr. Anish Koka on X • Dr. Dan Choi on X • Dr. Sanat Dixit on X

Send us a textWhy Physicians Need a Voice in Healthcare Policy👥 Hosted by: Dutch RojasDoctors:•Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcher at San Francisco General Hospital.•Anish Koka, MD – Private practice cardiologist, Philadelphia; long-time health policy commentator.•Dan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; early adopter of social media in spine surgery; healthcare advocate.•Sanat Dixit, MD, FACS – Neurosurgeon - Huntsville, AL, Faculty - Vanderbilt University; healthcare entrepreneur.🔍 Episode Overview:In this roundtable kickoff episode, four outspoken physicians join Dutch Rojas in The Doctor’s Lounge to talk candidly about the intersection of medicine, policy, and politics — and why more doctors need to speak up. From certificate-of-need laws to Medicare payment reform, from the Trump administration’s appointments to RFK’s role at HHS, the conversation dives into the structural problems holding back both doctors and patients.The doctors share why they each agreed to join the podcast, the power and pitfalls of physicians engaging publicly, and the need to protect autonomy in a system dominated by corporate healthcare and government bureaucracy.📌 Notable Quotes:• “If you truly want a free society, you need independent physicians.” – Dr. Dan Choi• “Once the government became a plan operator, it invited rent-seeking — and that’s all we’ve seen since.” – Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio• “Our patients trust us. We have to make sure the profession stays noble — and that means fixing the system.” – Dr. Sanat Dixit• “Republicans buy sneakers too. Stick to policy if you want your message heard.” – Dr. Anish KokaThe Episode:00:00 – Welcome to The Doctor’s Lounge00:33 – Meet the Doctors03:11 – Why This Podcast?05:05 – Tuttle Twins & Shaping Culture07:28 – Getting Physician Ideas Heard09:30 – Certificate-of-Need Laws10:53 – Passion for the Profession11:55 – Structural Reforms for a New Administration13:48 – Political Appointments & Culture Shift16:33 – Political Practicality vs. Idealism17:43 – Cynicism from the Lobbying Trenches22:00 – Is Democracy Still Working in Healthcare?23:36 – Behind the Scenes in D.C.24:57 – RFK at HHS30:11 – Metrics for Measuring Change33:45 – The Medicare Problem35:41 – The Case for Physician-Owned Hospitals39:32 – Facility Fees & Payment Disparity46:00 – Site-Neutral Payment Reform50:10 – Policy vs. Politics53:30 – Social Media & Physician Speech59:00 – The Chilling Effect of Employment01:02:14 – Restoring Free Speech for Physicians01:05:00 – Advice for Physicians Considering Speaking Out01:08:00 – Closing Thoughts🔗 Connect with the Hosts:• Dutch Rojas on X• Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X• Dr. Anish Koka on X• Dr. Dan Choi on X• Dr. Sanat Dixit on X