March 17, 1998: UFO Debate - Jim Dilettoso
The Art Bell Archive · Arthur William Bell III
February 12, 20243h 15m
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (archive.org) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
Art Bell hosts a heated debate between photographic analyst Jim Dilettoso and author Kal Korff over some of the most contentious cases in UFO history. The two clash over the Billy Meier photographs from Switzerland, with Korff declaring them a blatant hoax based on optical analysis and Dilettoso defending the testing he helped coordinate at facilities including Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Neither side gives ground as they argue over methodology, original negatives, and whether photos can be authenticated without them.
The debate shifts to the Phoenix Lights, the massive sighting event from March 1997. Korff contends the later filmed lights were military flares, while Dilettoso maintains that over 400 witness reports describe a single extraordinary event. Both agree the earlier V-shaped object sightings remain unexplained. Art sets up a live audience poll on his website and invites both guests to upload photographs for public examination.
Peter Davenport of the National UFO Reporting Center calls in to challenge statements made on air, adding another layer of conflict to an already explosive evening. The exchanges grow increasingly personal as allegations about credentials and credibility fly between the participants.
The debate shifts to the Phoenix Lights, the massive sighting event from March 1997. Korff contends the later filmed lights were military flares, while Dilettoso maintains that over 400 witness reports describe a single extraordinary event. Both agree the earlier V-shaped object sightings remain unexplained. Art sets up a live audience poll on his website and invites both guests to upload photographs for public examination.
Peter Davenport of the National UFO Reporting Center calls in to challenge statements made on air, adding another layer of conflict to an already explosive evening. The exchanges grow increasingly personal as allegations about credentials and credibility fly between the participants.