PLAY PODCASTS
The Importance of Critical Thinking and Civil Discourse in Today's Polarized World
Episode 179

The Importance of Critical Thinking and Civil Discourse in Today's Polarized World

Stanford’s Robert MacCoun shows how scientific habits can sharpen judgment and strengthen civil discourse in a polarized society.

Stanford Legal

February 5, 202631m 54s

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (op3.dev) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

In a world where confidence is rewarded and humility can feel like a liability, Stanford Law professor Robert MacCoun argues for something radical: fewer unwavering opinions, more critical reflection, and a better way to disagree. On Stanford Legal, MacCoun joins co-hosts Pamela Karlan and Diego Zambrano for a conversation about how “habits of mind” borrowed from science can help citizens, lawyers, and policymakers think more clearly and function more effectively in a pluralistic society.

MacCoun is the James and Patricia Kowal Professor of Law at Stanford Law School, a professor by courtesy in Stanford’s Psychology Department, and the university’s senior associate vice provost for research. Trained as a social psychologist, his work sits at the intersection of law, science, and public policy, with decades of research on decision-making, bias, and the social dynamics that shape how evidence is interpreted. In the episode, he draws on his most recent book, Third Millennium Thinking: Creating Sense in a World of Nonsense, co-authored with Nobel Prize–winning physicist Saul Perlmutter and philosopher John Campbell, to explain why probabilistic thinking, intellectual humility, and what he calls an “opinion diet” are essential tools for modern civic life.
 

Links:

Connect:

 

(00:00:00) Introduction and Noise vs. Bias

(00:04:42) The Power of Probabilistic Thinking

(00:12:20) Juries, Community Judgment, and Reasonable Doubt

(00:13:23) Habits of Community

(00:25:08) Motivation, Tools, and Decision Processes

(00:26:14) When Evidence Won’t Settle It


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Topics

stanford law schoolinterdisciplinary conversationface-saving belief revisionpam karlandiego zambranobias from demographics and mentorsscience communicationhumility in decision-makingpublic discourseprobabilistic thinkingnoise and bias in sciencescientific trustopinion dietcovid-19 opinionsnoise vs. biasopen-mindednessempirical reasoningthird millennium thinkingthinking in probabilitiesstanford legal podcastlegal scholarshipbelief updatingevidence-based reasoningrobert maccounlaw and psychologyfallible system of trustcritical thinkingdecision-making under uncertainty