PLAY PODCASTS
AI, Liability, and Hallucinations in a Changing Tech and Law Environment
Episode 161

AI, Liability, and Hallucinations in a Changing Tech and Law Environment

Stanford Legal

May 15, 202539m 31s

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (op3.dev) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

Since ChatGPT came on the scene, numerous incidents have surfaced involving attorneys submitting court filings riddled with AI-generated hallucinations—plausible-sounding case citations that purport to support key legal propositions but are, in fact, entirely fictitious. As sanctions against attorneys mount, it seems clear there are a few kinks in the tech. Even AI tools designed specifically for lawyers can be prone to hallucinations. 

In this episode, we look at the potential and risks of AI-assisted tech in law and policy with two Stanford Law researchers at the forefront of this issue: RegLab Director Professor Daniel Ho and JD/PhD student and computer science researcher Mirac Suzgun. Together with several co-authors, they examine the emerging risks in two recent papers, “Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models” (Oxford Journal of Legal Analysis, 2024) and the forthcoming “Hallucination-Free?” in the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. Ho and Suzgun offer new insights into how legal AI is working, where it’s failing, and what’s at stake.

Links:

Connect:

(00:00:00) Introduction to AI in Legal Education 

(00:05:01) AI Tools in Legal Research and Writing

(00:12:01) Challenges of AI-Generated Content 

(00:20:0) Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback

(00:30:01) Audience Q&A


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Topics

stanford law schoolai toolslegal research and writing instructorsmirac suzgunaccess to justicepam karlanreinforcement learningai-generated fact patternsstanford law and ai societytechnology changeslegal hallucinationsstanford law and technology associationlegal technologylegal fieldresponsible ai uselegal fermentfictitious case citationslegal sanctionsartificial intelligencedan holegal dimensionslegal writinglegal practice futureai integrationai in legal educationlegal workshopscase citationslegal briefslegal practicelegal storieslegal professionalslanguage modelshuman feedbackcircuit splitai-generated contentstanford legal liveai-assisted toolslegal conferenceslegal researchlegal education innovation