PLAY PODCASTS
Recent Missouri Ruling Has Implications For Understanding Of Lobbyists, First Amendment Rights

Recent Missouri Ruling Has Implications For Understanding Of Lobbyists, First Amendment Rights

St. Louis on the Air · St. Louis Public Radio

November 4, 20197m 57s

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (kwmu-adswizz.streamguys1.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

Ron Calzone isn’t a paid lobbyist. He might be better described as an activist. He has strong opinions about politics -- conservative ones. And because of that, he spends a fair amount of time in Jefferson City at the Missouri Capitol, seeking to persuade lawmakers to come around to his point of view. Not everyone likes that, and in 2014, someone filed a complaint against Calzone with the Missouri Ethics Commission. They said he needed to file as a lobbyist and pay annual registration fees, and the commission agreed. But Calzone didn’t back down so quickly. He’s a guy with strong opinions, after all. And he believed that being treated as a lobbyist violated his First Amendment rights, so he sued. Last Friday, he won. A nine-judge panel of the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals overruled a previous three-judge panel that had ruled against Calzone. In an 8-1 decision, the judges agreed that demanding Calzone register as a lobbyist violates his rights. In this segment, Calzone’s attorney, David Roland, talks with host Sarah Fenske.