PLAY PODCASTS
365 Challenging Soul-Making Theodicy 2 (Brandon Duke, Jerry Wierwille)

365 Challenging Soul-Making Theodicy 2 (Brandon Duke, Jerry Wierwille)

This is the second part of a conversation where Jerry Wierwille challenges Brandon Dukes soul-making theodicy. In particular, Wierwille raises the following questions: Why is hiddenness and epistemic distance considered a necessity for moral developm

Restitutio

November 12, 202051m 41s

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (podtrac.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

This is the second part of a conversation where Jerry Wierwille challenges Brandon Duke's soul-making theodicy. In particular, Wierwille raises the following questions:

  1. Why is hiddenness and epistemic distance considered a necessity for moral development considering the biblical examples where people experienced God and still retained their ability to make real moral choices either to obey or reject him?
  2. How can the four Ds (death, decay, deprivation, and damage) be considered good when scripture calls death itself God's enemy?
  3. Considering that evil and suffering are not 100% effective in bringing about moral development and are in some cases even deleterious to that end, how can soul-making work as a thoroughgoing theodicy?

—— Links ——