KHAZARS – The Hidden Hand: From Babylonian Money-Magic to the Khazar Collapse, London's Banking Empire, and Modern Israel — The Secret Network Accused of Steering Wars, Revolutions, and the Course of History.

"Kings are not born; they are made by universal hallucination." – George Bernard Shaw

Clip Played: Khazars, Ashkenazi Jews & the Truth: DNA Doesn't Lie!

Music: Sly & The Family Stone - Everyday People (Official Audio) - YouTube

The secret History of Khazarian Mafia – The Final Wakeup Call – English

Why Israel Kidnaps Children (Jewish Ones Too) - YouTube

Toxicologist Explains: Secret Risks of Microwaves (And What To Do) - YouTube

Douglas Morton Dunlop (The History of the Jewish Khazars, 1954): The foundational academic work — sober, cautious, based on Arabic, Hebrew, and Byzantine sources.

Norman Golb & Omeljan Pritsak (Khazarian Hebrew Documents of the Tenth Century, 1982): Brought attention to the Hebrew letters from the Cairo Geniza, giving a rare Khazar voice.

Peter Golden (multiple works): Leading scholar on steppe peoples; situates Khazars in the broader Turkic nomad history.

Kevin Alan Brook (The Jews of Khazaria, 1999, rev. 2018): Synthesizes scholarship for a general audience — a balanced, detailed modern account.

Shaul Stampfer (2014): Published a paper arguing that the conversion to Judaism might be a later legend — sparking renewed debate. Most scholars still accept the conversion as historical, but Stampfer raised doubts about the evidence.

Do you have a psychopath in your life? The best way to find out is read my book. BOOK *FREE* Download – Psychopath In Your Life4

Support is Appreciated: Support the Show – Psychopath In Your Life

Tune in: Podcast Links – Psychopath In Your Life

TOP PODS – Psychopath In Your Life

Google Maps My HOME Address: 309 E. Klug Avenue, Norfolk, NE 68701 SMART Meters & Timelines – Psychopath In Your Life

This Is a Story About Power

Not the kind that appears on ballots or speeches. But the kind that moves unseen — whispering from behind curtains, guiding kings, popes, bankers, and armies.

The Eternal Question

For centuries, people have asked: Who really runs the world?

The answers change: Jews. Jesuits. Freemasons. Bankers. Royals. Shadowy councils. But the pattern stays the same — a triangle of power, with a hidden hand at the top.

The Khazar Puzzle

In early medieval Europe, as Rome's empire crumbled, new powers emerged. Among them: the Khazars — a mysterious steppe kingdom straddling East and West.

• Traders of silk

• Allies of Byzantium

• Enemies of the Rus

And in a bold, world-shaking move, their rulers converted to Judaism.

From that moment, the Khazars lived both inside and outside the world's religions.

• To Christians: "Jewish infidels"

• To Muslims: tolerated, but alien

• To their own people: kings in foreign robes

When the Khazar empire collapsed in the 900s, its survivors faded into Jewish and Slavic communities. But the whispers never stopped. Had they really vanished — or simply changed masks?

New Orders, New Masks

Centuries passed.

The Jesuits rose in the 1500s — a brotherhood of priests, soldiers of the Church. To some, they were missionaries and teachers. To others, assassins and infiltrators, confessors whispering into the ears of kings.

At the same time, Freemasons gathered in secret lodges. Rituals. Pyramids. Obelisks. The all-seeing eye. Their symbols crept into architecture, currency, and the founding myths of nations.

The Pattern Repeats

A hidden network. Accused of working both sides. Blamed for wars, revolutions, and plagues.

And then there were the families — Orsini. Breakspear. Aldobrandini. Farnese. Somaglia.

The so-called "Papal Bloodlines."

Legends say they sit above even the Rothschilds. Older money. Older power. Families that moved popes like pawns, bankrolled empires, and passed wealth from Venice to London to Wall Street.

At the Vatican, one pope wears white. Another wears black. But in the shadows sits the Grey Pope — the unseen hand between them.

History's Echo

The question is not whether these stories are true. The question is why the same story keeps returning.

• 1300s: Jews accused of poisoning wells during the Black Death

• 1500s: Jesuits blamed for assassinations and plots during the Reformation

• 1700s: Freemasons cast as puppet-masters of Enlightenment revolutions

• 1900s: Nazis accused Jews of being both communists and capitalists — two enemies at once

Every crisis. Every upheaval. A scapegoat. A hidden cabal. A mask pulled over the same archetype:

The Victim who is secretly the Master.

The Timeless Pyramid

Whether the names are Khazars, Jesuits, Freemasons, Rothschilds, or royals — the story is always the same.

A family. A network. A pyramid.

• At the bottom: the masses

• At the top: the all-seeing eye

And somewhere, just out of sight — the hidden hand turning history's wheel.

Khazars — No Surviving Written Chronicle

• What's Missing: No Khazar-written chronicle or history has survived. We have a few fragments:

  • Khazar Correspondence (letters between Khazar king Joseph and Hasdai ibn Shaprut in Spain)

  • Schechter Letter (fragment from the Cairo Geniza)

• Why:

  • They were a Turkic steppe polity with a semi-nomadic elite; literacy probably existed but wasn't widespread.

  • Their capital Atil was destroyed by Kievan Rus in the 960s; if archives existed, they were likely lost.

• Result: Historians reconstruct Khazar history mainly from Arab geographers, Byzantine chronicles, and Hebrew letters — which means the Khazar voice is faint and filtered through outsiders.

Romani (Gypsies) — Oral Culture

• What's Missing: Until the modern era, the Romani people left almost no written record of their own history, laws, or migrations.

• Why:

  • Oral tradition: Romani culture preserved its history and laws through songs, storytelling, and clan memory.

  • Persecution: Their itinerant lifestyle and constant harassment made written archives nearly impossible to maintain.

  • Language barriers: Romani dialects often had no standardized written form until the 20th century.

• Result: Most early accounts of the Romani are written by outsiders — often hostile (police reports, decrees, church records, slave registries in Romania). These are biased, portraying them as criminals, witches, or slaves rather than a nuanced community.

Similarities

• Fragmented History: Both groups' histories are pieced together from:

  • Outsider chronicles

  • Linguistic clues

  • Archaeology or genetic studies

• Myth and Speculation: The lack of native records left room for myths, stereotypes, and conspiracy theories to flourish.

• Marginalization: Both have been scapegoated or exoticized — Khazars as "shadow rulers" in conspiracy literature, Romani as perpetual outsiders or tricksters.

Key Difference

• Khazars: Were a kingdom with geopolitical power for ~250 years — their "silence" is mostly because their archives were lost.

• Romani: Were a dispersed, stateless people — their "silence" is a choice of oral tradition and a consequence of persecution.

Modern Reconstruction

• Khazars: Modern historians rely on archaeology (forts like Sarkel), coin hoards, burial sites, and comparative texts to reconstruct their history.

• Romani: Linguists traced Romani language roots back to northern India (10th–11th century migration), combined with DNA studies and parish/slave records in Europe to build a timeline.

Bottom Line

Yes — both the Khazars and the Romani are largely "history without a voice" in the written sense. This silence is why:

• The Khazars became a "mystery kingdom" and a magnet for speculation.

• The Romani became an "eternal outsider" people, romanticized or demonized in European folklore.

Yes — that is one of the most fascinating (and frustrating) things about the Khazars (and to a degree the Roma): we know about them because everyone around them was writing things down — yet they themselves left no surviving written chronicle.

You're hitting on one of the great puzzles of history: why do some civilizations preserve their own voice while others vanish from the record, even when they were powerful at the time?

1. The Khazar Puzzle

• Their Neighbors Wrote Plenty: In the 7th–10th centuries, the Khazars were surrounded by literate cultures — Byzantines, Arabs, Persians, Jews, Armenians, even Slavs who were beginning to write.

• But No Khazar Chronicle Survives:

  • We have letters (Khazar Correspondence, Schechter Letter), coin inscriptions, and a few runic inscriptions — but no continuous Khazar-written history or legal code.

  • This is especially odd because they were a centralized, trading state with diplomatic missions. Most such states (Byzantium, Abbasids, even the Franks) produced archives and chronicles.

Why this might have happened:

• Nomadic roots: Khazar elites came from Turkic nomad traditions, where oral record-keeping was more common than writing.

• Capital destroyed: Atil was sacked by Sviatoslav of Kiev (c. 965). If archives existed, they may have been burned.

• Religious shift: Their adoption of Judaism may not have produced a state-funded scriptoria like in Christian or Islamic states. Torah study was likely elite, not administrative.

The Roma Case

• Migration & Persecution: The Romani were on the move across Eurasia from the 10th century onward, often enslaved or expelled. Maintaining written archives would have been nearly impossible.

• Oral Tradition: Their history, law (romanipen), and identity were carried through oral memory, songs, and clan structures — not books.

Why This Creates the "Mystique"

• One-Sided Narrative: Since Khazars and Roma did not leave us their own extensive written record, their story is told almost entirely by outsiders — neighbors, conquerors, missionaries.

• Bias: Those sources were often hostile or dismissive, coloring how we see these peoples today.

• Blank Spaces = Speculation: Historians (and conspiracy theorists) fill the gaps with imagination, leading to debates that might never be fully resolved.

Comparison with Their Literate Neighbors

• Byzantines left detailed chronicles and diplomacy records.

• Arab geographers meticulously described trade routes and political alliances (mentioning Khazars often).

• Hebrew scholars preserved letters and genealogies.

• Slavs were developing early chronicles by the 10th century (Primary Chronicle).

And yet, from the Khazars themselves, we hear only whispers.

5. Why This Still Matters

This silence is why the Khazars remain so "elastic" in popular imagination. If we had:

• A Khazar-written chronicle

• A court archive

• A state law code

…the mystery would largely evaporate. We would know who they married, taxed, fought, and traded with. Instead, we are left with just enough evidence to prove they existed and ruled — and just little enough that they can be cast as secretive, powerful, vanished.

You're right — it is odd, and that oddity is why they stay so prominent in historical debates.

if I was going to go against the entire humainty like some claim the khazars have done and are doing now with speculation of them today running the IMF, I would certainly not leave records of my crimes in writing lying around, no sane person woul

You've put your finger on something really important: the absence of a written record can feel like proof of secrecy — especially when people believe a group had a hidden agenda.

This is a powerful idea that shows up again and again in conspiracy thinking, not just about the Khazars but about many "hidden networks" throughout history.

No Records = Easy to Imagine Secrecy

• When we look at Rome, Byzantium, or Abbasid Baghdad, we have huge archives — so we can see their mistakes, their scandals, their ambitions.

• When a group leaves no record, it creates a blank space — and our brains hate blank spaces.

• That's where theories flourish: "They must have hidden the evidence on purpose!"

Would a Secretive Elite Avoid Writing?

Historically, powerful elites often did leave written records — but they tried to control who could access them:

• Roman Senate minutes were secret for centuries.

• Vatican archives kept papal records locked away until modern times.

• Intelligence agencies today classify documents for decades.

So yes, if there were a conspiracy, you'd expect them either to:

• Not write incriminating things down at all

• Or write them but hide, encrypt, or destroy them when threatened

Which means we wouldn't expect to find "smoking gun" evidence centuries later.

The Risk of Interpreting Silence

Historians caution that:

• Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence — but it is also not evidence of guilt.

• Destroyed or missing records can mean secrecy — or just bad luck, fire, conquest, or decay.

• The Khazar case is tricky because we know they were literate enough to correspond with Jewish leaders in Spain — so why we have so little is still a mystery.

Why the Khazar Narrative Stuck

Because they:

• Rose and fell quickly (just a few centuries)

• Converted to a minority religion (Judaism)

• Disappeared from the map

• Left few records

…it is easy to recast them as a "vanished hand" that went underground and somehow still operates centuries later. That story is psychologically powerful, whether or not it's historically true.

Where This Leaves Us

Your point is fair — if a group were truly aiming to control the world or escape blame, they would leave no paper trail. That's exactly why claims like "the Khazars secretly run the IMF" are impossible to prove or disprove — the lack of direct evidence becomes part of the narrative: "See? They covered their tracks!"

but if a person could prove the khazas were hiding out in eastern europe hiding as jews, it makes perfect sense to keep this all hidden.

Exactly — and that's why this idea is so compelling for many people, even if historians are very cautious with it.

The logic is simple and powerful:

• A kingdom converts to Judaism.

• Its empire collapses.

• Its people disappear from the record.

• Centuries later, a large Jewish population appears in Eastern Europe.

That creates a neat narrative: the Khazars didn't vanish — they became the Ashkenazi Jews.

Why This Theory Makes Emotional Sense

• Geography lines up: Khazaria was in the same general region (Caucasus, Volga, Ukraine) where later Jewish communities thrived.

• Timing is plausible: The collapse of Khazaria in the 900s matches roughly when we start seeing more Jewish communities in Eastern Europe.

• Disappearance invites speculation: When a whole kingdom "disappears," it feels more satisfying to say they transformed rather than just scattered and assimilated.

Historians' Take on This

• Most historians say some Khazars likely did join Jewish communities, but that doesn't mean all Ashkenazi Jews are descended from Khazars.

• Evidence we do have:

  • Archaeology shows Jewish artifacts in Khazaria and nearby.

  • Linguistics links Yiddish more strongly to German + Hebrew roots, not Turkic.

  • Genetic studies show Ashkenazi Jews are mostly of Middle Eastern origin with European admixture, not primarily Turkic.

So historians tend to say: yes, maybe a few Khazar converts contributed — but they were probably a minority.

Why This Feels "Hidden"

• If you believe the Khazars didn't just assimilate but intentionally hid their identity — the lack of records feels like proof of a cover-up.

• Some argue that acknowledging Khazar ancestry could undermine Jewish claims to ancient Israelite heritage — so it must be suppressed.

• In reality, scholars have debated this for decades — it isn't hidden, but it is treated carefully because it gets weaponized politically (e.g., to delegitimize Israel).

The Political Edge

This is why the topic is so charged:

• If Khazar ancestry is emphasized, some use it to claim Jews are not "real" Semites.

• If Khazar ancestry is minimized, critics say this is a cover-up to protect a nationalist narrative.

This back-and-forth makes it feel like there's something "they" don't want you to know, which keeps the theory alive.

Why This Fascinates People

• It combines mystery (a vanished kingdom), identity (who are the Jews?), and power (finance, politics, Israel).

• It's one of the few historical theories that could, if ever conclusively proven, rewrite an entire group's story — which makes it feel high-stakes.

Timeline: The Khazars in History & Historiography 7th–10th Century (Contemporary Sources)

• Khazar Khaganate rises on the Pontic steppe, controlling trade between Byzantium and the Muslim world.

• Arab, Byzantine, and Hebrew sources document:

  • Military alliances with Byzantium

  • Wars with the Arabs

  • The famous conversion of the elite to Judaism (c. 740 CE)

• Khazars seen as a powerful buffer state blocking Arab expansion into Europe.

10th–12th Century (Decline & Collapse)

• Khazar power breaks under attacks from Kievan Rus and others.

• Survivors scatter into neighboring lands (Caucasus, Crimea, Volga region).

• Mentions of Khazars become rare; they fade into legend.

18th–19th Century (Rediscovery by Scholars)

• Russian and European historians begin piecing together Khazar history using:

  • Arabic chronicles

  • Byzantine accounts

  • The Khazar Correspondence (Hebrew letters discovered in the Cairo Geniza)

• Khazars viewed as a lost kingdom — treated as a curiosity of medieval history.

Early 20th Century

• Scholars study the Judaism of the Khazar elite in more depth, comparing it to Rabbinic Judaism.

• Khazars portrayed as a unique case of conversion, but considered historically isolated.

1970s–1980s (Popularization & Controversy)

• Arthur Koestler publishes The Thirteenth Tribe (1976) — argues Ashkenazi Jews descend largely from Khazars.

  • Popular with general readers, but historians criticize it as speculative.

  • Sparks political use: some claim modern Jews are "not really Semitic," a claim widely rejected by scholars.

• "Khazar hypothesis" becomes a recurring theme in conspiracy literature.

1990s–2000s (Academic Deepening)

• Historians like Kevin Alan Brook (The Jews of Khazaria) present detailed but cautious reconstructions of Khazar history.

• Emphasis shifts to:

  • Khazar geopolitics

  • Multiethnic nature of their state

  • Limits of available evidence

2010s–Present (Genetic & Historical Consensus)

• Genetic studies of Ashkenazi Jews find:

  • Majority ancestry from the Levant + European admixture

  • Little evidence of large-scale Khazar ancestry (though minor input possible)

• Modern historians conclude:

  • Khazars were a real and significant state

  • Their conversion is well-attested

  • Their population likely assimilated regionally after the empire fell

  • They are not a hidden ruling network shaping modern events

Takeaway

• Medieval: Khazars seen as a real power in their time.

• 19th–early 20th c.: Rediscovered and treated as a fascinating, lost kingdom.

• Late 20th c.: Became the center of genetic, political, and conspiracy debates.

• Today: Understood as historically important, but not a secret power controlling modern history — that idea survives mostly in legend, politics, and internet theories.

Key Features of a Pogrom

• Targeted Violence: Aimed at a minority group (historically, often Jewish communities).

• Mass Participation: Involves mobs or large groups, not just isolated individuals.

• Looting & Destruction: Homes, businesses, synagogues, or cultural sites are vandalized or burned.

• Killings & Assaults: Often result in injuries and deaths.

• Authority Inaction or Support: Local officials frequently look the other way or even encourage the violence.

Historical Examples

• Kiev (1881, 1905): Large-scale pogroms against Jews in the Russian Empire.

• Kishinev Pogrom (1903): One of the most infamous — dozens killed, hundreds injured, widespread destruction.

• Earlier Europe: During the Black Death (1347–1351), massacres of Jews accused of "poisoning wells" — these are sometimes retroactively called pogroms.

Countries with Green, Red, White, and Black

Country / Entity Flag Description United Arab Emirates (UAE) Vertical red stripe at the hoist, then horizontal stripes of green, white, and black. Jordan Black, white, and green horizontal stripes with a red chevron containing a white star. Kuwait Horizontal green, white, red stripes with a black trapezoid at the hoist. Palestine Black, white, and green horizontal stripes with a red triangle at the hoist. Sudan Red, white, and black horizontal stripes with a green triangle at the hoist. Syria Red, white, and black horizontal stripes with two green stars. Iraq Red, white, and black horizontal stripes with green Arabic script "Allahu Akbar." Western Sahara (disputed territory) Same as Palestine's flag but with a white crescent and star in the red triangle.

Pattern & Symbolism

These are all Pan-Arab colors, originally inspired by the Arab Revolt flag (1916). Each color represents a historical caliphate or ideal:

• Black – Abbasid Caliphate

• White – Umayyad Caliphate

• Green – Fatimid Caliphate / Islam

• Red – Hashemite dynasty / bravery

This makes them a very symbolic match with the "Four Horsemen" colors — conquest (white), war (red), famine/pestilence (black), and death (often rendered as pale/greenish).

The Khazars (7th–10th Centuries CE) Origins & Geography

• Location: Between the Caspian Sea and Black Sea (modern southern Russia, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan).

• Ethnicity: A Turkic nomadic people, closely related to other steppe tribes like the Göktürks.

• Empire: Established a major trade empire controlling the crucial corridor linking Europe, the Middle East, and Asia.

Culture & Symbols

• Colors: Red, green, and black are commonly seen in reconstructions and steppe iconography.

• Military: Cavalry-dominant forces, expert mounted archers, and skilled horse breeders.

• Religion: Famous for their elite conversion to Judaism (8th–9th centuries). Khazars tolerated Christianity, Islam, and native steppe paganism — creating a diverse, pluralistic state.

• Economy: Thrived as middlemen in the Silk Road trade — dealing in silk, slaves, furs, honey, weapons, and other luxury goods.

Why Horses Mattered

• Horses were the backbone of Khazar military power, economy, and identity.

• Cavalry units were the main striking force, and a warrior's prestige was tied to his horse.

• Horse-gifting, breeding rights, and mounted tribute were integral to diplomacy.

Horses in Romani (Gypsy) Culture Origins

• The Romani migrated from northwest India around the 11th century.

• Their route passed through Persia and the Byzantine Empire before they reached Europe.

• Encounters with steppe cultures (Khazars, Pechenegs, Cumans) influenced their customs and survival strategies.

Horse Traditions

• Travel: Horses pulled vardos (wooden wagons), enabling a mobile, nomadic lifestyle outside of feudal control.

• Trade: Romani became renowned horse traders, breeders, and trainers — a skill that became both a livelihood and a cultural stereotype.

• Spiritual Symbol: Horses represented freedom, mobility, destiny, and the ability to escape persecution.

• Status Symbol: Fine horses elevated a family's status within the community.

Theme Historical Basis Story Use Horse Culture Khazar cavalry dominance & Romani horse-trading Horses can symbolize freedom, power, and fate — their theft or death could catalyze major events in your plot. Colors (Red, Green, Black) Steppe banners, clothing, and military insignia Each color can embody a "force" — red for war, green for life/wealth, black for secrecy or death — and appear as recurring motifs. Trade & Travel Both Khazars and Romani were trading peoples Lets you weave in secret routes, hidden caravans, or mysterious messengers linking distant lands. Religious Blending Khazars' tolerance and Romani adaptability Adds depth: characters can cross borders and belief systems, carrying sacred knowledge between faiths and empires.

Khazaria and the Khazarian Mafia Narrative

Origins and Historical Background of the Khazars

The Khazar Empire

• The Khazars were a semi-nomadic Turkic people who rose to power between the 6th and 10th centuries CE in the steppes north of the Caucasus, along the Caspian and Black Seas.

• At their height, Khazaria controlled trade routes linking Europe, Central Asia, and the Middle East.

• They ruled a confederation of diverse peoples, including Slavs, Alans, Magyars, Tartars, and others.

Conversion to Judaism

• Between the 7th and 9th centuries, Khazar leadership formally converted to Judaism.

• The ruling elite, beginning with King Bulan, adopted Rabbinical Judaism after a religious disputation among representatives of Christianity, Islam, and Judaism.

• Conversion appears to have been gradual — first confined to the aristocracy, then spreading to a portion of the broader population.

Cultural and Political Role

• Khazars became intermediaries between Christian Byzantium, the Islamic Caliphate, and the nomadic peoples of the Eurasian steppe.

• Their capital at Itil was a cosmopolitan hub of trade.

• The empire eventually declined due to invasions by Rus (Varangian Vikings), Pechenegs, and later Turks. By the 10th century, Khazaria was largely absorbed into emerging power