PLAY PODCASTS
IPC Meeting Feb 7th – The LaRouche Oasis Plan: Water, Not War! A Human Future for Palestine

IPC Meeting Feb 7th – The LaRouche Oasis Plan: Water, Not War! A Human Future for Palestine

International Peace Coalition Meeting #88, Friday…

Programs and Interviews

February 7, 20251h 38m

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (feeds.soundcloud.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

International Peace Coalition Meeting #88, Friday February 7, 11am ET/5pm CET We will be joined by Larry Johnson, Jonathon Kuttab and others for the discussion. Join the discussion period on Zoom: https://schillerinstitute.nationbuild... First: Don’t try to brush aside the Trump-Netanyahu press conference of Feb. 4 as just another case of the President throwing out preposterous proposals as a “negotiating tactic,” in which he didn’t really mean what he said: That the United States would take over and “own” Gaza; that the U.S. would use military force “if necessary” to achieve that; and that 1.8 million Palestinians would be “relocated” to neighboring countries (who all quickly restated that they would not be party to such ethnic cleansing). Unlike others, “I was not completely surprised” by Trump’s statements, Helga Zepp-LaRouche stated during her Feb. 5 webcast dialogue with veteran intelligence analyst Larry Johnson. “We had already known about this plan, which was issued for the first time by Prime Minister Netanyahu’s office last May.” Furthermore, EIR’s Daily Alert of Feb. 2 reported that Netanyahu’s “ostensible agenda with Trump includes discussing the nature of Phase 2 of the ceasefire and hostage exchange agreement between Israel and Hamas. But Netanyahu has a deeper agenda: to get Trump’s backing for his genocidal plan to expel all Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza and turn the area into an ethnically-cleansed part of Greater Israel—a long-standing dream of the British Foreign Office and its geopolitical ideology.” There are 61,000 dead Palestinians, at last official count, to attest to the fact that the application of that policy is already underway in Gaza. Second: The only way to achieve peace in the region is to simultaneously move on the political and economic fronts. A two-state solution, in which Palestine’s sovereignty is recognized and at last implemented, is essential. At the same time, the massive reconstruction of the area must begin as part of an overall development plan for the region – the LaRouche Oasis Plan – in which China and the nations of Europe and the United States jointly cooperate to build nuclear plants to desalinate vast quantities of fresh water to green the desert, and construct canals and other major infrastructure. The Oasis Plan is the proper answer to National Security Adviser Mike Waltz’s effort to backpedal in the face of the storm of national and international opposition, falsely stating on Feb. 5 that “nobody has a realistic solution” other than the Trump plan. “I don’t think [Trump] should be criticized in any way,” Waltz argued. “It’s going to bring the entire region to come up with their own solutions if they don’t like Mr. Trump’s solution. Waltz and his boss should be informed that Americans do not like Trump’s proposal, and that he would be smart to study and implement the LaRouche Oasis Plan instead. Third: There is an underlying axiomatic problem in the West (including the United States), that has to be addressed head-on, or the genocide will not be stopped. And that is the deeply-rooted belief that the fundamental interests of the United States are at odds with those of other countries, that there is not a common interest that all Mankind shares. That view is as false as it is dangerous. “Every time a country thinks that they are the only relevant one, the superior one, I think it goes in an awfully wrong direction,” Zepp-LaRouche asserted. “Speaking as a German, I’m always wary. It doesn’t matter which country it is: if they think they are better than others, it has the seed of a potential catastrophe. I think the only way the world will eventually get to peaceful development is if the rightful demand of every single country on the planet has their security interests protected and has their right to development protected.”