Press.

John returns for a frank, contemplative discussion about the sex registry.

Riley Paige delivers a bold testimony, thoroughly touching and discomfiting the jury. In the media we hear about Keith's prior convictions.

JV Hampton-VanSant speaks about his unique dual experience of being assaulted and then accused of assault - following one traumatic incident. He also speaks to the problems we face in understanding same sex assault and struggles with racial stereotyping.

Disturbing content from Keith's phone is revealed in trial. Rumor of a medical issue suffered by Riley Paige is circulated online, but withheld from the jury.

Professional Statement Analyst Rick Whitehead breaks down the science, offering examples, applications, and real world experience.

Detective Suarez finishes the analysis of Keith Montgomery's statement as jurors conclude its discussion. Keith is revealed to have a public defender. Is his defense overworked and under-resourced?

After going through the system for a sensitive crime, today’s speaker breaks down the strange realities of conviction and post conviction life.

Detective Suarez begins the process of breaking down Keith’s statement line by line. Today's sponsors: Daily Harvest & Zip RecruiterGo to DAILY-HARVEST.com and enter promo code DELIBERATIONS to get three items FREE in your first box!To try ZipRecruiter for free go to ZIPRECRUITER.com/CHELSEA

Civil attorney Kelvin Fisher discusses opportunities and challenges for sexual assault victims in civil court.

The way Detective Suarez applied Statement Analysis is revealed. Was the investigation corrupt? Ralph the juror admits to watching a program on lie detection. Did he violate a jury instruction?

Today we catch up with Jessa about her success with Getting Off. We also talk Michael Peterson, Casey Anthony, and OJ. Because we can’t help ourselves.

An internal memo from the Sheriff's office is revealed to incentivize investigators to pursue sexual battery cases. Lead Detective Suarez announces she employed a lie detecting social science to Keith Montgomery's statement to police.

Derek Cajun, owner of Love Systems, breaks down the reality of pick up artistry. Is it a field of sexual predators or earnest clients seeking a genuine connection?

The prosecution argues Keith Montgomery’s former exploits into the school of seduction “pick up artistry” demonstrates a pattern of his to rape women by ignoring their non consent. This episode is brought to you by Daily Harvest. Go to DAILY-HARVEST.com and enter promo code DELIBERATIONS to get three items FREE off your first box.

We’re breaking down actor/comedian Aziz Ansari’s entanglement in the most questionable accusation of sexual assault yet. Did he cross the line? And if so, was that line assault?

The results of Riley Paige’s rape kit reveal an injury. Is it the result of a violent encounter or a consensual act? When a discrepancy in Riley’s account is exposed, the trial explores how commonly inconsistent statements appear in sensitive crime reporting. Jurors must decide whether Riley's omission is an understandable mistake or a red flag.

Vanessa, a brave and judicious victim, shares her story of assault. She explains why, having been through the legal process before as a victim, she decided not to come forward and report. If you or someone you know needs help, please call the US National Assault Telephone Hotline at 800.656.HOPE or visit https://centers.rainn.org/ If you are in the UK, please call the National Domestic Violence Helpline at 0808 2000 247.

Keith and Riley each make contact with one another following the night in question. Jurors analyze these messages in hopes they reveal what truly happened.

Cohosts of the hit podcast Getting Off speak to me about how they balance victim sensitivity with defendants’ presumption of innocence, as well as offer professional insight into the concept of victim blaming.

The stage is set for the trial of Keith Montgomery as both alleged victim and defendant are introduced. Jurors consider whether Riley Paige had lingering feelings for Keith when she invites him into her home on the night in question.This show is sponsored by Daily Harvest and Ziprecruiter. Go to DAILY-HARVEST.com and enter promo code DELIBERATIONS to get three items FREE off your first box.And now you can post jobs on ZipRecruiter for FREE by going to ZipRecruiter.com/Chelsea

The Trial of Keith Montgomery.

Samantha Hall is sentenced.

In our final episode of Season 1, we wrap up our jury group interview and I explain what to expect for Season 2.

Jessa explains what sentencing hearings are like from a defense attorney's perspective, as well as the harsh realities of prisoners' Suicide Watch.

The gang is back! Listen to the performers discuss their real opinions, what the deliberations process was like for them, and how they felt listening to fans' response.

Have you considered how Master/Slave contracts could come into play if the submissive alleges abuse? Me too! Jessa talks about her fascinating previous cases on the subject.

Actress Mikaela Fleming, who played Samantha Hall, shares her thesis on the way BDSM helped her heal and strengthen after trauma.

Jessa answers a fan request to discuss the controversial death of Daniel Shaver.

In the first episode of our four part series “After The Verdict,” I speak to real life humiliatrix Ceara Lynch.

Jessa weighs in on her reaction to the Samantha Hall verdict, as well as her thoughts on the real life murder conviction of Michelle Carter.

Samantha Hall's verdict is finally delivered. Today's sponsors are Baublebar.com and Daily-Harvest.com. Use promo code DELIBERATIONS to get three items free off your first box!

Jessa discusses the pitfalls and bias of media coverage during high profile criminal trials.

The Hall jurors edge closer to their final decision.

Jessa Nicholson Goetz returns to discuss uncomfortable truths about juries: composition, selections, and the confounding "Allen Charge."

ADA Laherty and Mr Cortez lay out closing arguments. Jurors go over instructions and contemplate the emotional taxation of their long-lasting deliberations, what’s waiting for them at home, and fears over public reaction to their verdict.

Sensitive Crimes Defense Attorney Jessa Nicholson Goetz speaks about her history exploring BDSM in a criminal murder trial.

Samantha Hall takes the stand.

Rebecca concludes her personal story about the trial week she spent in the company of a true sadist.

Kroger explains the true power dynamic between a Dominant and submissive. Public biases against alternative sexualities are exposed. Mistress Carolynne reprises her testimony. Guest starring LA Dominatrix Justine Cross.

Submissive "Rebecca" returns to share her thoughts on the latest episode of Deliberations, give greater context to the lifestyle of D/s, and take us inside a deeply personal story that's relevant to the show's moral controversy.

The jury examines the charge of manslaughter. The prosecution leans on Samantha’s suspicious choice of rope, as well as its purchase date. Troy reassures Samantha about his commitment to safety in a text exchange.

In this episode Attorney Kelvin Fisher explains the difference between civil and criminal juries, the process of jury selection, and what constitutes a need to be stricken for cause. He also postulates why a couple of strong-minded jurors in the Samantha Hall trial (Mandy and Carl) were not dismissed from jury selection.

A rope bondage expert demonstrates the knot Samantha allegedly tied. Jurors hold and experience the physical evidence: rope, knot, and footstool. Guest starring rope bondage expert Miss Cassie.

This week a real lifestyle submissive (going by the pseudonym Rebecca) explains the unique and often-misunderstood way of life chosen by her and her "Master." Rebecca also answers listener questions and weighs in on her perspective of Samantha Hall's guilt or innocence.

Jurors analyze a video of Samantha and Troy as well as a heated voicemail in which the sub reprimands his mistress. The benchmarks for a Second Degree finding are discussed, and a Domme/friend of Samantha testifies about the defendant’s treatment of her romantic partners.

Experts debate Samantha’s psychological state of mind. Jurors disagree on the credibility of one expert’s opinion over another. The press considers the repercussions of Samantha Hall’s actions on the BDSM community.

The jury covers justifiable and excusable homicide and dives into the legal criteria for First Degree. The prosecution offers evidence of Samantha’s motive to kill.

Jurors read from a dossier of Troy’s online posts, in which the depth of his submission to Samantha is unveiled. Those present in the deliberations room are disturbed by his experiences and explore whether Samantha’s control of him extended beyond recreation to brainwashing. The court learns about the history of erotic asphyxiation and the way in which it’s experienced. Troy’s ex girlfriend takes the stand.

Jurors analyze Samantha’s 911 call and the circumstances surrounding Troy’s discovery. A former service provider to Troy, professional dominatrix Mistress Carolynne reveals the particulars of her profession and history with the victim. When discussing the Dominant/submissive dynamic between Samantha and Troy, the jury explores where the line is drawn between consent and abuse. Guest starring LA Dominatrix Justine Cross.

Jurors enter deliberations in the trial of Samantha Hall, a dominatrix on trial for murdering her submissive lover, Troy, by instructing him to asphyxiate with a rope. As the press sensationalizes and speculates, Samantha’s six member jury attempts to methodically establish the case timeline. Tensions develop between jurors as judgement arises over the defendant’s alternative lifestyle