Beneath The Supreme Court Earthquake — Part 1
Why this pro-choice law professor agrees with the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (podtrac.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
To unlock exclusive content, visit: https://politicology.com/plus
Renowned constitutional scholar Akhil Reed Amar (Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale University) joins Ron Steslow to discuss the recent Supreme Court decision, including overturning Roe v. Wade, and why (as a liberal law professor) he agrees with that decision as well as their approach.
(01:50) What is Originalism?
(04:33) Changes in case law over time
(17:11) Why Griswold v. Connecticut (contraception) is different from Roe v. Wade (abortion)
(18:56) The outlier analysis
(34:10) How the Supreme Court treats precedent
(39:20) Women’s equality: the argument for abortion rights liberal justices should have made
Read Akhil’s op-ed in the Wall Street Journal about the leaked Dobbs decision: https://on.wsj.com/3z6d6DH
Read Akhil’s piece in Time Magazine about how liberal justices should use Originalism: https://bit.ly/3AK3Vdo
Follow Ron on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/RonSteslow
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices