Episode 208
OA208: Moore is Still Less
Today's episode takes a deep dive into a 2003 Supreme Court decision, , and discusses the Constitution's ex post facto clause. Why? Listen and find out! After that, we break down the alleging defamation, intentional infliction...
Opening Arguments · Opening Arguments Media LLC
September 11, 20181h 3m
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (dts.podtrac.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
Today's episode takes a deep dive into a 2003 Supreme Court decision, Stogner v. California, and discusses the Constitution's ex post facto clause. Why? Listen and find out! After that, we break down the $95 million lawsuit filed by Roy Moore against Sacha Baron Cohen alleging defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and fraud. Is it meritorious? Who's Moore's lawyer? Will you laugh? There's only one way to know! Finally, we end with Thomas Takes the Bar Exam Question #92 regarding the introduction of testimony against a gang member. Remember to follow our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and like our Facebook Page so that you too can play along with #TTTBE! Recent Appearances None! If you'd like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at [email protected]. Show Notes & Links
- Here's the link to Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607 (2003).
- Click here to read the $95 million lawsuit filed by Roy Moore against Sacha Baron Cohen.
Topics
mooresachabaroncohencatholicchurch