PLAY PODCASTS
The Red Dress Effect: Are women in red sexier?
Episode 5

The Red Dress Effect: Are women in red sexier?

Normal Curves: Sexy Science, Serious Statistics · Regina Nuzzo and Kristin Sainani

April 7, 20251h 9m

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (op3.dev) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

Wear red and drive men wild with lust – or so says scientific research on color’s role in human mating. But can a simple color swap really boost a woman’s hotness score? In this episode, we delve into the evidence behind the Red Dress Effect, from a controversial first study in college men to what the latest research says about who this trick might work for (and who it might not). Along the way we encounter red monkey butts, old-Internet websites, the Winner’s Curse in scientific research, adversarial collaborations, and why size (ahem, sample size) really does matter. 

Statistical topics

  • Reproducibility crisis in psychology
  • Sample size
  • Selection bias
  • Winner’s curse
  • Cohen’s d standardized effect size
  • Adversarial collaboration
  • Meta-analysis
  • Preregistration
  • Publication bias
  • Statistical moderators

Methodological morals

“The smaller the sample, the flashier the result, the less you should trust it.”

“Good scientists learn from their statistical mistakes and fix them.”



References


Kristin and Regina’s online courses: 

Demystifying Data: A Modern Approach to Statistical Understanding  

Clinical Trials: Design, Strategy, and Analysis 

Medical Statistics Certificate Program  

Writing in the Sciences 

Epidemiology and Clinical Research Graduate Certificate Program

Chapters

  • (00:00) - Introduction
  • (06:04) - Red Dress Effect on TV
  • (10:01) - Red Monkey Butts
  • (12:56) - 2008 Study on Romantic Red
  • (16:04) - HotOrNot.com
  • (20:10) - 2008 Study Results
  • (26:07) - Cohen’s d Standardized Effect Size
  • (31:49) - Problems with Small Sample Sizes
  • (35:09) - Winner’s Curse and Publication Bias
  • (39:37) - Reproducibility Crisis
  • (45:00) - Adversarial Collaboration
  • (49:58) - Meta-Analysis and Pre-Registration
  • (56:20) - Adversarial Discussion Sections and Updates
  • (01:03:52) - Latest Red Study
  • (01:07:23) - Wrap-Up


Topics

Normal Curves podcastKristin SainaniRegina NuzzoStanford UniversityGallaudet Universityjournal club podcaststatistics podcastscience podcastfemale co-hosts podcastconversational science podcastpodcast for grad studentspodcast for medical studentspodcast for science postdocsbest science podcastsscience communicationmedical writingscience writingstatisticscritiquing scientific studiesdebunking psychology mythsthe science behindhow to read scientific papersMathmath podcastdata analysisscientific researchprobabilitystatistical literacydata interpretationscientific studiesstatistical methodsdata visualizationstatistical significancehypothesis testingbiostatisticsstatistical modelingquantitative analysisstatistical inferencedata sciencestatistics educationstatistics consultingstatistics humorsociety and culturedatingsexfitnessrelationshipsmedicineprofessorsfashionfemale professorsjournal clubNormal CurvesNormal Curves podcast red dress episodered dressred dress effectwearing redsexy red dresswearing red makes you sexierred monkey buttsevidence behind red dress effectromantic red studiespsychology podcastsocial psychology wearing redwinner’s curse explanationwinner’s curse examplesmall sample size explanationadversarial collaboration explanationadversarial collaboration exampleproblems with small experimental studiescohen’s d effect sizecohen’s d explanationmeta-analysis podcastmeta-analysis examplepre-registration examplepre-registration explanationpublication bias explanationselection bias examplestatistical moderators explanationreproducibility crisis psychology