Season 1 · Episode 51
AI Policy Wargaming: Can Agents Argue Better Than Humans?
Can AI agents debate global policy better than humans? We explore AI wargaming, from UN simulations to stress-testing geopolitics.
My Weird Prompts · Daniel Rosehill
December 10, 202529m 58s
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (dts.podtrac.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
What if you could run a UN assembly in your computer, complete with AI agents representing different nations and ideologies? In this episode, Corn and Herman explore Daniel Rosehill's provocative idea: using multi-agent AI systems to model policy decisions, stress-test geopolitical assumptions, and let competing perspectives debate how the world should work. They dive into system prompting, the Rally tool, experimental projects like WarAgent, and the thorny question of whether algorithmic perspective-taking can actually improve human decision-making—or just hide our biases behind a veneer of systematic analysis.