The Supreme Court Hearing on Jawboning
Evelyn is joined by Genevieve Lakier to break down the Supreme Court oral arguments in Murthy v. Missouri, the case alleging members of the Biden administration unconstitutionally jawboned the social media companies into taking down content.
Moderated Content · Evelyn Douek, Genevieve Lakier
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (cdn.simplecast.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
Stanford’s Evelyn Douek is joined by Professor Genevieve Lakier of the University of Chicago Law School to discuss the Supreme Court oral arguments in Murthy v. Missouri.
- For one of their previous conversations on this topic, listen to this episode from September last year talking about the 5th Circuit’s decision in the case.
- They also discuss Stanford’s amicus brief in the case, and the Stanford Internet Observatory’s blog post summarizing factual errors that have pervaded the case.
Join the conversation and connect with Evelyn and Alex on your favorite social media platform that doesn’t start with “X.”
Moderated Content is produced in partnership by Stanford Law School and the Cyber Policy Center. Special thanks to John Perrino for research and editorial assistance.
Like what you heard? Don’t forget to subscribe and share the podcast with friends!