Meltzer Lippe: Briefly Speaking: No Contest Clauses - Do They Really Prevent Estate Litigation?
Meltzer Lippe Briefly Speaking · Meltzer Lippe
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (content.rss.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
Episode Overview
No contest clauses—also known as in terrorem clauses—are commonly used in estate planning to discourage beneficiaries from challenging a will or trust. But how effective are they in practice?
In this episode, David Heymann, Managing Partner, sits down with David Bamdad, Chair of the firm's Trust & Estate Litigation Practice group, to take a closer look at how no contest clauses work, the common pitfalls that can limit their enforceability, and whether they truly reduce estate litigation. They also discuss legal limitations on their use and explore potential changes on the horizon that may impact how these clauses are drafted and enforced.
This conversation offers practical insight for individuals planning their estates as well as professionals navigating trust and estate disputes.
Topics Covered
- What are no contest (in terrorem) clauses?
- Common mistakes when including no contest clauses in estate planning documents
- Do no contest clauses actually reduce litigation?
- Legal limitations and exceptions
- Emerging trends and future considerations