Podcast with Germund Hesslow on cerebellum and pavlovian conditioning

How does a single Purkinje cell receiving half a million inputs learn to produce a precisely timed eye blink, and why has the cerebellum been so difficult to understand despite its crystalline simplicity? Germund Hesslow reveals what decades of painstaking physiology have uncovered.

Subscribe for more from the Convergent Science Network podcast series.

Germund Hesslow describes his journey from Freudian psychology to hardcore cerebellar physiology, drawn by the exceptional quality of research in the Lund laboratory rather than the subject matter itself. The serendipitous discovery that Pavlovian conditioning occurs in the cerebellum united his interests in learning with his technical expertise, launching a 25-year investigation into how associative memory is formed at the cellular level. Working with a decerebrate preparation that retains only the cerebellum and brainstem, Hesslow's group demonstrates that conditioning follows essentially the same rules as in intact animals, taking similar time to acquire and extinguish.

The episode provides a clear account of the cerebellar circuit for eye-blink conditioning. Conditioned stimulus information arrives via mossy fibers and parallel fibers, converging on Purkinje cells that also receive climbing fiber input carrying the unconditioned stimulus signal. With each Purkinje cell receiving up to half a million parallel fiber inputs carrying information about virtually everything happening to the organism, the system is ideally suited for forming associations. The learned response manifests as a precisely timed pause in the Purkinje cell's tonic inhibitory output, which disinhibits the deep cerebellar nuclei to generate the conditioned eye blink.

The central unsolved problem is timing. The conditioned response is adaptively timed to the interstimulus interval: train with 300 milliseconds and the response peaks at 300 milliseconds; train with 500 milliseconds and it shifts accordingly. Hesslow's recent experiments systematically eliminate candidate timing mechanisms. Stimulating mossy fibers directly still produces timed responses, ruling out delays in the input pathway. Stimulating parallel fibers directly yields the same result, eliminating delays in the granule cell layer. The timing mechanism must reside close to the Purkinje cell itself, either in cortical interneurons or in the cell's intrinsic properties.

Hesslow also raises the provocative possibility that different zones of the cerebellum, despite their apparently uniform crystalline structure, may operate with different temporal and functional properties, potentially explaining decades of disagreement between researchers working on eye-blink conditioning, vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation, and in vitro slice preparations in different cerebellar regions.