PLAY PODCASTS
Trump's Supreme Court Immunity Decision
Episode 26

Trump's Supreme Court Immunity Decision

Hawk Podcasts

June 27, 202437m 48sExplicit

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (cdn.simplecast.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

In this episode Hawk, fresh from his COVID-19 adventure, stumbles through the maze of Donald Trump's immunity claims. Picture this: Trump, the former Commander-in-Chief and convicted felon, is essentially arguing for a "Get Out of Jail Free" card that would make even Monopoly players jealous. The Supreme Court, meanwhile, is busy trying to decide if being President is like having a lifetime supply of legal teflon.

Hawk takes us on a whirlwind tour of the oral arguments, where justices pondered such pressing questions such as whether a president could order a military coup (you know, just your average Tuesday in the Oval Office). He predicts that while the Court won't give Trump total immunity, they might invent a new game show called "Is It Official or Personal?" for future presidents to play. As for Trump's other cases, it's like a legal version of Whack-A-Mole - knock one down, and another pops up.

Finally, Hawk dives into Jack Smith's indictment, which reads like a political thriller with a cast of characters that would make a soap opera blush. Six unnamed co-conspirators? It's like Clue, but with fewer candlesticks and more subpoenas. Hawk wraps up by hoping for a pre-election trial, because nothing says "democracy" like deciding the fate of a presidential candidate between campaign rallies.

Oh, and don't forget to buy some Pride merch at hawkmerchstore.com to support the Kaleidoscope Youth Foundation in Columbus, Ohio (kycohio.org) - all profit from the Pride Collection goes to this amazing non-profit for the month of June.

Links to Judge Chutkan immunity decision and Jack Smith's J6 Indictment

Judge Chutkan immunity decision attached to this post - sourced from this article:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149.171.0.pdf

Jack Smith's January 6th Indictment (also attached):
https://www.justice.gov/storage/US_v_Trump_23_cr_257.pdf

SUPPORT & CONNECT WITH HAWK

- Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mdg650hawk 

- Hawk's Merch Store: https://hawkmerchstore.com 

- Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mdg650hawk7thacct 

- Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hawkeyewhackamole 

- Connect on BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/mdg650hawk.bsky.social 

- Connect on Substack: https://mdg650hawk.substack.com 

- Connect on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hawkpodcasts 

- Connect on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mdg650hawk 

- Connect on Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/mdg650hawk

 

ALL HAWK PODCASTS INFO

- Additional Content Available Here: 

  • https://www.hawkpodcasts.com
  • https://www.youtube.com/@hawkpodcasts

- Listen to Hawk Podcasts On Your Favorite Platform:

  • Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3RWeJfy
  • Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/422GDuL
  • YouTube: https://youtube.com/@hawkpodcasts
  • iHeartRadio: https://ihr.fm/47vVBdP
  • Pandora: https://bit.ly/48COaTB

Topics

mar-a-lagojanuary 6th casetanya chutkanpresidential immunityelection daymanhattandojhawk droppingselection fraudlegal analysispridepride 2024conspiracycovid-19supreme courtindictmentimmunitybill barrtrial datejanuary 6thdonald trumpdepartment of justicepride monthfake electorsscotuselection fraud claimsfulton countyjeffrey clarkco-conspiratorsjudge tanya chutkanofficial actsconspiracy chargespodcastcriminal prosecutionun-indicted co-conspiratorstrialmar-a-lago casecasejack smithpersonal actsjudge chutkan