![DumbBleep of the Week! [Bernie vs. Ian vs. Dan Rather vs. More] || EP 342](https://static.libsyn.com/p/assets/c/b/4/e/cb4eaf3566b7282e27a2322813b393ee/GML_logo2-20241101-wakqkady2k.jpg){kind=logo}
DumbBleep of the Week! [Bernie vs. Ian vs. Dan Rather vs. More] || EP 342
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (dts.podtrac.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
Twitter Blocking a New York Post Article Was Dumb—but Not Illegal, Censorship, or Election Interference
By definition, Twitter can't violate the First Amendment rights of the president, members of Congress, or anyone else. First Amendment violations are things the government does to the people, not the other way around. There is nothing in the Constitution prohibiting Twitter from restricting speech on its platform, and it is certainly not "censorship" (which has denoted government suppression of information since the office of censor was created in Ancient Rome to impose public morality).
Need someone to talk to?
Interested in learning how to Day Trade?
Support the show and join the live group!
Patreon.com/goodmorningliberty
Protect your wealth, escape taxation, and live like a true Libertarian by going to:
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices