PLAY PODCASTS
Episode 0x1E: Our Non-Profits Considered

Episode 0x1E: Our Non-Profits Considered

Free as in Freedom

December 16, 201144m 33s

Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (faif.us) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.

Show Notes

<p> <a href="https://faif.us/cast-media/FaiF_0x1E_Non-Profits-Considered.ogg"><img alt="[Direct download of cast in Ogg/Vorbis format]" src="https://faif.us/static/img/cast/audio_ogg_button.png"/></a> <a href="https://faif.us/cast-media/FaiF_0x1E_Non-Profits-Considered.mp3"><img alt="[Direct download of cast in MP3 format]" src="https://faif.us/static/img/cast/audio_mp3_button.png"/></a> </p> <p> <p>Karen and Bradley discuss recent debates about the value of non-profit organizations for Free Software.</p> </p> <h3>Show Notes:</h3> <h4>Segment 0 (00:34)</h4> <ul> <li><a href="http://identi.ca/conversation/86021752#notice-86121871">Fontana (and other Red Hat employees) pointed out some imprecision</a> in what Bradley said in <a href="http://faif.us/cast/2011/nov/29/0x1D/">Episode 0x1D</a> about Debian non-free. (01:07)</li> <li>A <a href="http://info9.net/wiki/fosdem/LegalIssuesDevRoom/CFP/">call for participation</a> has <a href="https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/fosdem/2011-November/001356.html">been announced</a> for <a href="http://info9.net/wiki/fosdem/LegalIssuesDevRoom/">the <cite>Legal and Policy Issues DevRoom</cite></a> at <a href="http://fosdem.org/2012/">FOSDEM 2012</a>. Please submit a proposal by 30 December 2011 (04:30)</li> <li>A recent debate about non-profits started, initiated by a blog post called <a href="http://www.mikealrogers.com/posts/apache-considered-harmful.html"><cite>Apache Considered Harmful</cite></a>. (12:55)</li> <li>Karen and Bradley briefly mentioned that <a href="http://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html">some now believe that <cite>Considered Harmful Considered Harmful</cite></a> (13:16)</li> <li>A long thread on this issue occurred on the <a href="http://flossfoundations.org/">FLOSS Foundations</a> <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/foundations">mailing list</a> (13:45)</li> <li>Bradley made <a href="http://sfconservancy.org/blog/2011/nov/28/what-npo-for/">an official Conservancy Blog post about the value of non-profits for Free Software</a> (14:17)</li> <li><a href="http://slashdot.org/story/01/08/24/128216/va-linux-to-sell-proprietary-version-of-sourceforge">Sourceforge became proprietary software in 2001</a>, as is well-described in this by <a href="http://www.advogato.org/article/376.html">The Sourceforge proprietarization debacle is well described in an article by Lo&iuml;c Dachary</a>. (19:19)</li> <li>Bradley mentioned <a href="http://faif.us/cast/2011/jun/07/0x11/">FaiFCast Episode 0x11, which discussed the OpenOffice.org/Apache/LibreOffice situation</a>. (44:35)</li> <li>Bradley pointed out that this debate conflates a lot of different issues, and tried to list all the conflated questions here: <ul> <li>Should a non-profit home decide what technical infrastructure is used for a software freedom project? And if so, what should it be?</li> <li>If the projects doesn't provide technological services, should non-profits allow their projects to rely on for-profits for technological or other services?</li> <li>Should a non-profit home set political and social positions that must be followed by the projects? If so, how strictly should they be enforced?</li> <li>Should copyrights be held by the non-profit home of the project, or with the developers, or a mix of the two?</li> <li>Should the non-profit dictate licensing requirements on the project? If so, how many licenses are ok?</li> <li>Should a non-profit dictate strict copyright provenance requirements on their projects? If not, should the non-profit at least provide guidelines and recommendations?</li> </ul> </ul> <hr width="80%"/> <p>Send feedback and comments on the cast to <a href="mailto:[email protected]">&lt;[email protected]&gt;</a>. You can keep in touch with <a href="https://faif.us">Free as in Freedom</a> on our IRC channel, #faif on irc.freenode.net, and by <a href="http://identi.ca/conservancy">following Conservancy on identi.ca</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/conservancy">and Twitter</a>.</p> <p>Free as in Freedom is produced by <a href="http://danlynch.org/blog/">Dan Lynch</a> of <a href="http://danlynch.org/">danlynch.org</a>. Theme music written and performed by <a href="http://www.miketarantino.com">Mike Tarantino</a> with <a href="http://www.charliepaxson.com">Charlie Paxson</a> on drums.</p> <p><a rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png" hspace=10 /></a> The content of <span xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" href="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Sound" rel="dc:type">this audcast</span>, and the accompanying show notes and music are licensed under the <a rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike 4.0 license (CC BY-SA 4.0)</a>. </p>

Topics

open sourceopensourcefreesoftwaresoftware freedomlegallawlinuxfreelicensegpllgplagplbsd