Col. Larry Wilkerson and Chas Freeman: Israel's attack on Iran and Its DEVASTATING Consequences
Dialogue Works · Nima Rostami Alkhorshid
June 14, 202553m 3s
Audio is streamed directly from the publisher (sphinx.acast.com) as published in their RSS feed. Play Podcasts does not host this file. Rights-holders can request removal through the copyright & takedown page.
Show Notes
Israel's strike may escalate tensions; U.S. ties, deception, and oil deals noted.
Nima Rostami Alkhorshid:
- What is your view on the recent Israeli attack on Iran and its implications?
- How do you interpret Trump’s contradictory statements regarding the attack?
- Do you believe the attack will lead to a diplomatic resolution or further escalation?
Amb. Chas Freeman:
- The attack was likely intended to sabotage peace talks and create pressure on Iran, but it may have the opposite effect.
- Trump's message before the attack seems deceptive, aimed at keeping Iran off guard, which is not uncommon in warfare.
- This move might push Iran toward pursuing nuclear weapons, which could significantly escalate tensions in the region.
Col. Larry Wilkerson:
- The operation shows deep coordination between Israel, the U.S., and intelligence agencies like Mossad and CIA.
- There appears to be a quid pro quo involving oil infrastructure, as no Israeli strikes targeted Iranian oil facilities.
- The use of drones and covert operations highlights dangerous precedents in international conflict and diplomacy.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.